Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Immunol. 2008 Aug 8;20(5):588–593. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.06.014

Optimal HLA Matching in Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Effie W Petersdorf 1
PMCID: PMC3182141  NIHMSID: NIHMS69864  PMID: 18674615

Summary of Recent Advances

Only 30% of patients in need of a hematopoietic cell transplant will have an HLA identical sibling to serve as the donor. Advances in the field of immunogenetics together with the growth of donor registries and cord blood banks worldwide have provided many of these patients the opportunity for a life saving transplant. Current data demonstrate the importance of matching the unrelated donor for HLA alleles and antigens. When a matched volunteer donor is not available, use of mismatched donors may be considered. New concepts in the selection of mismatched donors include consideration for the locus, the number of mismatches, differences between alleles and antigens, the location and nature of amino acid mismatches that define class I epitopes, and the presence of haplotype mismatching. When cord blood transplantation is an option, both cell dose and HLA matching are important variables. Optimizing the overall outcome of hematopoietic cell transplantation requires an appreciation for the relative importance of HLA factors with respect to other non-genetic factors that also influence transplant outcome.

Keywords: unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), HLA epitopes, HLA haplotypes, non-inherited maternal antigens (NIMA), cord blood transplantation (CBT)

Introduction

2008 marks the 50th anniversary of the description of HLA antibodies. [1] The field of immunogenetics has witnessed many milestones during this time, beginning with the clinical application of serological typing reagents followed by the development of cellular assays. Most recently, molecular methods have provided an unprecedented view of the diversity of the HLA region. The application of DNA-based methodologies to the selection of unrelated donors (URDs) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has contributed to the improved survival of transplant recipients and has shed light on the basis of alloreactivity in transplantation. This review highlights work in the field of immunogenetics of HLA in HCT with a focus on new studies published in 2007. Specific emphasis on the criteria for the evaluation and selection of URDs, mismatched related donors, and cord blood units is provided. The work described by these studies showcases the importance of HLA alloantigens and their haplotypes in shaping graft failure, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse, and provides a platform for the use of HLA mismatched stem cell products for the treatment of hematologic disorders.

Unrelated Donor HCT

Mismatching for Different HLA Loci Confer Risks of Different Magnitude

Current criteria for the selection of URDs for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is based on high-resolution definition of the class I HLA-A, B, C, and class II DRB1, DQB1 alleles. Historically, matching for alleles at all five loci (“10/10” matched) lowers the risks of clinically severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and mortality and is associated with superior disease free survival (DFS) compared to transplantation from mismatched donors. [24]

When only HLA mismatched donors are available, knowledge of locus-specific risks may aid in donor selection. [25] Among Caucasian transplant recipients, single locus mismatches are each associated with significantly increased risks of acute GVHD (HLA-A, B and C), transplant-related mortality (TRM) (HLA-A, C and DRB1) and mortality (HLA-A, C and DRB1). [6] Of all the classical HLA genes, HLA-DQB1 mismatching may be the most permissible. [6] These data suggest that outcome after HCT from “8/8” matched donors at HLA-A, B, C and DRB1 is associated with similarly good outcome as 10/10 HCT, and suggest that when a matched donor is not available, use of a donor with a single DQB1 mismatch may be acceptable.

Recent data suggest that HLA-DPB1 is a classical transplantation gene, mismatching of which is associated with graft failure and GVHD. [710] The observation that the risks of GVHD may be offset by a beneficial effect of graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) leading to lower disease recurrence, provides a potential therapeutic avenue for patients with high-risk malignancies. [8]

The Total Number of Mismatches Affects the Risks of Graft Failure, GVHD and Mortality

Risks of graft failure, acute GVHD and mortality are amplified with multi-locus mismatching. [24,6,7,9,11,12] Additive effects of mismatching at HLA-A, B, C and DRB1 can be measured for early, intermediate and late stage disease. The most pronounced effect of HLA disparity on survival is evident for patients with early stage disease in whom a 10 – 11% lower survival is observed with every additional HLA mismatch. [6] Although the presence of a single HLA-DQB1 mismatch was tolerable, the presence of an HLA-DQB1 disparity in addition to mismatches at HLA-A, B, C, or DRB1 was associated with worse outcome, indicating that prospective HLA-DQ typing is indicated when the choice must be made among donors with known HLA-A, B, C, or DR mismatches. [6]

The Risks of Graft Failure and GVHD are Higher with Mismatching for HLA-C Antigens Compared to Alleles

The availability of molecular methods for HLA typing in the late 1980s opened a new era of donor matching and selection; the demonstration that HLA antigens could represent a family of unique sequences or alleles, had a dramatic impact on donor matching and stimulated new research into the relative risks of alleles and antigens. Studies have suggested that antigen mismatches (disparities between two serologically different HLA determinants) are more immunogenic than allele mismatches (disparities between two unique sequences of the same HLA antigen) [4] particularly for HLA-C. [13] These data suggested that when HLA matched donors are not available, prioritization of allele mismatched over antigen mismatched donors may lower post-transplant complications. When the stage of disease is taken into account, allele mismatches may be as detrimental as antigen mismatches, [2] suggesting that transplant outcome is defined by both the degree of donor mismatching as well as disease risk.

In the recent CIBMTR study, antigen and allele mismatches conferred similar risks with one important exception, HLA-C. [6] When compared to transplants from HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 allele matched donors (“8/8”), HLA-C allele mismatches were not associated with statistically significantly higher mortality, TRM or acute GVHD; however, transplantation from donors mismatched for HLA-C antigens conferred increased risk. These data suggest that selection of an HLA-C allele mismatched donor should be prioritized over an HLA-C antigen mismatched donor, when HLA matched donors or single DQB1 mismatched donors are not available.

Mismatching at Specific Epitopes Confer Risk

The allele and antigen-associated risks described above suggest that the immunogenecity of HLA mismatches may be influenced by the nature of nucleotide substitutions located within the peptide binding groove and/or at positions involved in contact with the T-cell receptor. Two major approaches have been taken to identify functional residues. The concept that alloreactivity arises from donor recognition of recipient sequence polymorphisms encoded in the α1 and α2 domains of class I molecules led to the use of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor (CTLPp) assay for measuring CD8-positive T cell mediated alloreactivity between HLA class I mismatched pairs. [14] Comparative sequence analysis has provided novel information on putative residues important in GVH allorecognition. [15,16]

Early work demonstrated a correlation between CTLp and GVHD risk; lower frequencies of patient-specific CTLs were associated with lower probability of clinical GVHD. [17] The association of clinical outcome with CTLp reactivity was informative for the number of mismatches encoded within the α helix and β-pleated sheet of single class I locus mismatches. [18] The presence of 5α/5β mismatches in addition to a negative CTLp was a strong predictor of favorable outcome compared to any other mismatch. These results suggest that both the number of mismatched eptiopes as well as the ability of these epitopes to elicit a CTLp, provide additional information than either variable alone on the tolerability of class I mismatches.

Site-specific mutagenesis has been used to elucidate HLA-DP motifs that define alloreactiveT cell epitopes. Presence of the 8LFQG11 motif encoded by the HLA-DP β chain abrogates the T cell epitope (TCE) and is indicative of permissible mismatches [10,19,20] Since the vast majority of recipients and donors selected on criteria for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 and DQB1 are mismatched at the HLA-DP locus, the absence of this alloreactive disparity has major practical implications in the selection of donors. As many as 75% of donor-recipient pairs would not be mismatched for the TCE disparity in the host-versus-graft direction and use of such donors would be predicted to substantially lower the risk of graft failure, especially in the setting of HCT for thalassemia. [20]

Non-permissive mismatches may also be defined through a sequence comparison of each mismatched residue with clinical outcome. The putative amino acid sequence of all polymorphic positions encoded among patients and their URDs can be deduced from the high resolution typing of each HLA class I and II allele. The earliest study to correlate transplant outcome with mismatching for specific class I residues did so in a homogeneous population of HLA-B mismatched unrelated donors and recipients. [15] Mismatching at HLA-B for positions 114 and 116 was associated with increased risk of TRM; position 116 disparity was associated with increased risk of severe GVHD and likely contributed to the high TRM in these patients. A linear relationship between the number of mismatched positions and the probability that a donor-recipient would be mismatched at 116 was observed. These data suggested that interaction of the position 116 amino acid with the P9 residue of the bound peptide plays a key role in defining immunogenecity of HLA-B molecules.

The observations from the Ferrara analysis were extended in a recent, comprehensive study of 5210 patients. [16] A total of 4 HLA-A, 1 HLA-B, 7 HLA-C, 2 HLA-DR/DQ haplotypes, and 2 HLA-DP non-permissive mismatch combinations were identified. Furthermore, risk increased as the number of non-permissive mismatches increased from 0 to 1 or 2 or more. Donor-recipient mismatching at 6 specific positions were found to define GVHD risk: Tyr9 – Phe9 of HLA-A; Tyr9 – Ser9, Asn77 – Ser77, Lys80 –Asn80, Tyr99 – Phe99, Leu116 – Ser116, and Arg156 – Leu156 of HLA-C. Interestingly, these positions also strongly correlated with the predictive models for hydrophobicity. The data provide a framework for the definition of high-risk mismatches.

Mismatching for HLA-A,B,DR Haplotypes Confers Risk

The current approach for the selection of potential URDs is based on matching each allele of each antigen defined by HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 and DQB1. Since HLA matched URDs and recipients are identical by state, they may differ for undetected variation within the HLA region; such undetected polymorphism may be functional and may account for the increased risks of GVHD compared to HLA genotypically identical sibling HCT. A haplotype-based approach for mapping novel transplantation determinants is based on the extensive linkage disequilibrium (LD) across the HLA region and the concept that the physical relationship of HLA alleles on haplotypes might serve as a surrogate marker of functionally important undefined inter-locus variation carried on those haplotypes. A novel method for physically linking markers across megabase distances has recently been applied to assess whether haplotype matching could further improve clinical outcome beyond 5-locus, 10-allele matching. [21] Although the 10/10 allele matched donor-recipient pairs encoded common HLA alleles and antigens, 20% were haplotype mismatched. The presence of haplotype mismatching was associated with a significantly increased risk of grades III – IV acute GVHD and lower risk of recurrent disease, indicating a GVL effect. These data suggest that novel transplantation determinants may be defined through evaluation of the extended HLA haplotype, and that the overall results of HLA matched URD HCT may be further optimized by haplotype matching.

Haploidentical Related HCT: The NIMA Effect

The immediate availability of family donors provides an attractive alternative to a URD, particularly when the patient’s clinical status warrants expedient timing of the transplant, and/or the patient’s genotypes and haplotypes strongly suggest that the search for a suitable URD may be long and difficult. Siblings may share one maternal or paternal haplotype with each other. Non-inherited maternal antigens, also known as NIMA, are those antigens of the non-shared haplotypes. Transplantation from mother to child is associated with low risk of both acute and chronic GVHD and mortality indicating that there is donor-specific suppression of T cell responses against NIMAs. In contrast, transplantation from father to child is associated with higher risk of GVHD, indicative of an immunizing effect of paternal antigens. [2224] This clinical experience provides a means to further optimize transplant outcome through the preferential selection of family members inheriting haplotypes encoding NIMAs.

Non-genetic Factors Influence Transplant Outcome: Stage of Disease

One of the strongest risk factors for recurrence of disease after HCT is the stage of disease at the time of transplantation. [2,6] These studies indicate that disease factors as well as availability of potential donors and their HLA match status should be taken into account when planning HCT; a balance between the risks of disease recurrence and the risks associated with HLA mismatching is imperative when the search does not yield matched donors. In addition to disease stage, recipient age, race and CMV serostatus may influence transplant outcome. [6,25] CMV positivity of the transplant recipient (regardless of the donor’s serostatus), recipient age older than 31 years, and recipient African American background are each independent risk factors for mortality. [6]

The HLA Barrier in Cord Blood Transplantation

The establishment of cord blood (CB) banks has greatly facilitated cord blood transplantation (CBT) as a therapeutic modality for both pediatric and adult blood disorders. [2635] CBT provides a unique model for understanding the HLA barrier. The current standard for the selection of CB units includes definition of HLA-A and B antigens and DRB1 alleles (6 total determinants); with this standard, the vast majority of CBTs have been performed using units with match grades of 6/6, 5/6, or 4/6 to the recipient. [36] The higher tolerance for HLA mismatching in CBT compared to bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation has been attributed to fewer mature T cells in the cord blood graft and their diminished capacity to participate in Th1 responses. [37] Despite HLA incompatibility, acute GVHD risk may be lower after CBT than after URD HCT, and recent data suggests that chronic GVHD following CBT may be more responsive to therapy. [38] The major limitation of CBT, particularly for adults, has been the limiting cell dose per recipient body weight; low cell dose correlates not only with slower rate of engraftment and lower overall survival, but also lower probability of achieving engraftment. Several new approaches have been pioneered to surmount the limitations of cell dose, including the use of double CB units [3941] and expansion of units to facilitate engraftment. [42] The development of reduced intensity conditioning regimens is an attractive option for patients at high risk of regimen-related toxicity. [4345] The extensive historical background of CBT is beyond the scope of this HLA update, and the reader is invited to several outstanding recent reviews. [36,37,4550]

Cell dose is the most important factor that consistently correlates with outcome after CBT. The complex interaction between the effects of cell dose and HLA mismatching has made the study of independent HLA effects challenging; however, HLA-associated risks can be measured when cell dose is taken into account. [2628,3032,35,46] Furthermore, the negative effects associated with HLA mismatching can in part be abrogated with higher cell dose. [35] An HLA dose effect is also apparent; the risks of graft failure increase as the number of HLA mismatches increases, and the combination of class I with class I mismatches correlates with risk of severe acute GVHD. [51] HLA mismatching may be especially detrimental for patients with non-malignant diseases. [35,52] Evidence for a GVL effect associated with higher degrees of HLA mismatching strongly contributes to higher disease-free survival for patients with high risk leukemia [35,48] [53]

Emerging evidence suggests that risks may be locus-specific. Disparity for class II, particularly for HLA-DRB1, may increase risk of acute GVHD and mortality. [54] If matching for HLA-A and B antigens and DRB1 alleles is associated with better outcome compared to mismatching, will matching for HLA alleles provide a means to further optimize CBT? The benefit of high resolution typing information was recently evaluated in a population of 122 recipients of CB transplants. [55] Not surprising the degree of HLA allele matching ranged from 2/10 to 8/10. No statistically significant association between the number of HLA disparities and neutrophil recovery was observed; however, mismatching at HLA-A and C were each associated with a reduced incidence of engraftment. Retrospective analysis of the role for high resolution typing and matching in CBT remains an important question and one that will require large, well-characterized transplant populations due to the anticipated high degree of allele mismatching and the need to account for cell dose.

Conclusions

Increasing the availability of URD HCT requires information on the rules that govern permissible HLA mismatching and a better understanding of HLA-associated risks of GVHD and potential benefits of GVL. The definition of permissible mismatches according to amino acid substitutions at key residues provides a novel approach for broadening the use of mismatched donors. For patients who have HLA matched donors, haplotype matching may provide a means to achieve comprehensive matching for undetected variation linked to HLA genes. CBT is an attractive option for patients who lack a donor, and/or whose disease activity does not afford the time for an unrelated donor search. Although the limits of HLA mismatching in CBT are still coming into focus, clinical experience indicates that a higher degree of HLA disparity can be tolerated and is associated with beneficial GVL effects.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Petersdorf is supported by grants CA100019, CA18029 and AI69197 from the National Institutes of Health, USA.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.van Rood JJ, Eernisse JG, van Leeuwen A. Leukocyte antibodies in sera from pregnant women. Nature. 1958;181:1735–1736. doi: 10.1038/1811735a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Petersdorf EW, Anasetti C, Martin PJ, Gooley T, Radich J, Malkki M, Woolfrey A, Smith A, Mickelson E, Hansen JA. Limits of HLA mismatching in unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2004;104:2976–2980. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Morishima Y, Sasazuki T, Inoko H, Juji T, Akaza T, Yamamoto K, Ishikawa Y, Kato S, Sao H, Sakamaki H, et al. The clinical significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allele compatibility in patients receiving a marrow transplant from serologically HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR matched unrelated donors. Blood. 2002;99:4200–4206. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.11.4200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Flomenberg N, Baxter-Lowe LA, Confer D, Fernandez-Vina M, Filipovich A, Horowitz M, Hurley C, Kollman C, Anasetti C, Noreen H, et al. Impact of HLA class I and class II high resolution matching on outcomes of unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation: HLA-C mismatching is associated with a strong adverse effect on transplant outcome. Blood. 2004;104:1923–1930. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sasazuki T, Juji T, Morishima Y, Kinukawa N, Kashiwabara H, Inoko H, Yoshida T, Kimura A, Akaza T, Kamikawaji N, et al. Effect of matching of class I HLA alleles on clinical outcome after transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from an unrelated donor. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1177–1185. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810223391701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *6.Lee SJ, Klein J, Haagenson M, Baxter-Lowe LA, Confer DL, Eapen M, Fernandez-Vina M, Flomenberg N, Horowitz M, Hurley CK, et al. High-resolution donor-recipient HLA matching contributes to the success of unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Blood. 2007;110:4576–4583. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-097386. This study is the largest analysis of HLA matching in recipients from North America. HLA-DQB1 mismatching was found to be the best tolerated of all mismatches, and provides the basis for a new definition of “8/8” matching. New information on the importance of non-genetic factors that influence transplant outcome provides a framework for the selection and timing of HCT. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *7.Shaw BE, Gooley TA, Malkki M, Madrigal JA, Begovich AB, Horowitz MM, Gratwohl A, Ringdén O, Marsh SGE, Petersdorf EW. The importance of HLA-DPB1 in unrelated donor haematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2007;110:4560–4566. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-095265. HLA-DP is a classical transplantation antigen capable of graft-versus-host and graft-versus-leukemia allorecognition. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shaw BE, Marsh SG, Mayor NP, Russell NH, Madrigal JA. HLA-DPB1 matching status has significant implications for recipients of unrelated donor stem cell transplants. Blood. 2006;107:1220–1226. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Morishima Y, Yabe T, Matsuo K, Kashiwase K, Inoko H, Saji H, Yamamoto K, Maruya E, Akatsuka Y, Onizuka M, et al. Effects of HLA allele and killer immunoglobulin-like receptor ligand matching on clinical outcome in leukemia patients undergoing transplantation with T-cell-replete marrow from an unrelated donor. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:315–328. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fleischhauer K, Locatelli F, Zecca M, Orofino MG, Giardini C, De Stefano P, Pession A, Iannone AM, Carcassi C, Zino E, et al. Graft rejection after unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for thalassemia is associated with nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 disparity in host-versus-graft direction. Blood. 2006;107:2984–2992. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chalandon Y, Tiercy JM, Schanz U, Gungor T, Seger R, Halter J, Helg C, Chapuis B, Gratwohl A, Tichelli A, et al. Impact of high-resolution matching in allogeneic unrelated donor stem cell transplantation in Switzerland. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;37:909–916. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *12.Loiseau P, Busson M, Balere M-L, Dormoy A, Bignon J-D, Gagne K, Gebuhrer L, Dubois V, Jollet I, Bois M, et al. HLA association with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcome: the number of mismatches at HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRBI or -DQBI is strongly associated with overall survival. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:965–974. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.04.010. This study demonstrates the additive effects of multi-locus mismatching on lowered survival after T replete unrelated HCT. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Petersdorf EW, Hansen JA, Martin PJ, Woolfrey A, Malkki M, Gooley T, Storer B, Mickelson E, Smith A, Anasetti C. Major-histocompatibility-complex class I alleles and antigens in hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1794–1800. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Duquesnoy RJ. A structurally based approach to determine HLA compatibility at the humoral immune level. Hum Immunol. 2006;67:847–862. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2006.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ferrara GB, Bacigalupo A, Lamparelli T, Lanino E, Delfino L, Morabito A, Parodi AM, Pera C, Pozzi S, Sormani MP, et al. Bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors: the impact of mismatches with substitutions at position 116 of the human leukocyte antigen class I heavy chain. Blood. 2001;98:3150–3155. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.10.3150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **16.Kawase T, Morishima Y, Matsuo K, Kashiwase K, Inoko H, Saji H, Kato S, Juji T, Kodera Y, Sasazuki T. High-risk HLA allele mismatch combinations responsible for severe acute graft versus host disease and implication for its molecular mechanism. Blood. 2007 doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-072405. This is the most comprehensive analysis of HLA mismatching of specific residues of class I and II molecules, and provides a new framework for the definition of permissible HLA mismatches. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Oudshoorn M, Doxiadis II, van den Berg-Loonen PM, Voorter CE, Verduyn W, Claas FH. Functional versus structural matching: can the CTLp test be replaced by HLA allele typing? Hum Immunol. 2002;63:176–184. doi: 10.1016/s0198-8859(01)00384-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *18.Heemskerk MB, Cornelissen JJ, Roelen DL, van Rood JJ, Claas FH, Doxiadis II, Oudshoorn M. Highly diverged MHC class I mismatches are acceptable for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;40:193–200. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705721. Functional assays provide important information regarding the immunogenecity of class I molecules, and can be used to prioritize the selection of mismatched donors. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zino E, Frumento G, Marktel S, Sormani MP, Ficara F, Di Terlizzi S, Parodi AM, Sergeant R, Martinetti M, Bontadini A, et al. A T-cell epitope encoded by a subset of HLA-DPB1 alleles determines nonpermissive mismatches for hematologic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2004;103:1417–1424. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *20.Zino E, Vago L, Di Terlizzi S, Mazzi B, Zito L, Sironi E, Rossini S, Bonini C, Ciceri F, Roncarolo MG, et al. Frequency and targeted detection of HLA-DPB1 T cell epitope disparities relevant in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:1031–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.05.010. Site-directed mutagenesis of HLA-DPB1*0901 was used to demonstrate the high-risk nature of alloreactive T cell epitopes of the DP molecule. This study introduces a new concept for permissible HLA-DP mismatches and an approach for epitope-specific donor selection to lower post-transplant risks. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *21.Petersdorf EW, Malkki M, Gooley TA, Martin PJ, Guo Z. MHC haplotype matching for unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation. PLoS Medicine. 2007 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040008. A long-range phasing method was applied to demonstrate the functional nature of HLA haplotypes. These results provide a new approach for optimizing outcome after allele-identical unrelated HCT. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van Rood JJ, Loberiza FR, Jr, Zhang MJ, Oudshoorn M, Claas F, Cairo MS, Champlin RE, Gale RP, Ringden O, Hows JM, et al. Effect of tolerance to noninherited maternal antigens on the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation from a parent or an HLA-haploidentical sibling. Blood. 2002;99:1572–1577. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.5.1572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Obama K, Utsunomiya A, Takatsuka Y, Takemoto Y. Reduced-intensity non-T-cell depleted HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation for older patients based on the concept of feto-maternal tolerance. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;34:897–899. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shimazaki C, Fuchida S, Ochiai N, Nakano S, Yamada N, Uchida R, Okamoto M, Okano A, Inaba T, Maruya E, et al. Non-T-cell-depleted HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning in advanced haematological malignancies based on feto-maternal microchimerism. Br J Haematol. 2004;127:474–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kollman C, Howe CWS, Anasetti C, Antin JH, Davies SM, Filipovich AH, Hegland J, Kamani N, Kernan NA, King R, et al. Donor characteristics as risk factors in recipients after transplantation of bone marrow from unrelated donors: the effect of donor age. Blood. 2001;98:2043–2051. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.7.2043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gluckman E, Rocha V, Boyer-Chammard A, Locatelli F, Arcese W, Pasquini R, Ortega J, Souillet G, Ferreira E, Laporte J-P, et al. Outcome of cord-blood transplantation from related and unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:373–381. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199708073370602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rubinstein P, Carrier C, Scaradavou A, Kurtzberg J, Adamson J, Migliaccio AR, Berkowitz RL, Cabbad M, Dobrila NL, Taylor PE, et al. Outcomes among 562 recipients of placental-blood transplants from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1565–1577. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811263392201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wagner JE, Barker JN, Defor TE, Baker KS, Blazar BR, Eide C, Goldman A, Kersey J, Krivit W, MacMillan ML, et al. Transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood in 102 patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases: influence of CD34 cell dose and HLA disparity on treatment-related mortality and survival. Blood. 2002;100:1611–1618. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Long GD, Laughlin M, Madan B, Kurtzberg J, Gasparetto C, Morris A, Rizzieri D, Smith C, Vredenburgh J, Halperin EC, et al. Unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation in adult patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003;9:772–780. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2003.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Laughlin MJ, Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Wagner JE, Zhang MJ, Champlin RE, Stevens C, Barker JN, Gale RP, Lazarus HM, et al. Outcomes after transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2265–2275. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rocha V, Labopin M, Sanz G, Arcese W, Schwerdtfeger R, Bosi A, Jacobsen N, Ruutu T, de Lima M, Finke J, et al. Transplants of umbilical-cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with acute leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2276–2285. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cornetta K, Laughlin M, Carter S, Wall D, Weinthal J, Delaney C, Wagner J, Sweetman R, McCarthy P, Chao N. Umbilical cord blood transplantation in adults: results of the prospective Cord Blood Transplantation (COBLT) Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11:149–160. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kurtzberg J, Cairo MS, Fraser JK, Baxter-Lowe L, Cohen G, Carter SL, Kernan NA. Results of the cord blood transplantation (COBLT) study unrelated donor banking program. Transfusion. 2005;45:842–855. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04428.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Parkman R, Cohen G, Carter SL, Weinberg KI, Masinsin B, Guinan E, Kurtzberg J, Wagner JE, Kernan NA. Successful immune reconstitution decreases leukemic relapse and improves survival in recipients of unrelated cord blood transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12:919–927. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *35.Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Zhang MJ, Stevens C, Kurtzberg J, Scaradavou A, Loberiza FR, Champlin RE, Klein JP, Horowitz MM, et al. Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study. Lancet. 2007;369:1947–1954. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60915-5. This large analysis of children receiving cord blood transplantation demonstrates the interaction of HLA matching and cell dose of the cord blood unit in transplant outcome. HLA disparity was associated with lower post-transplant disease recurrence, indicating a GVL effect. These data demonstrate the need for increased HLA diversity of cord blood banks to meet the clinical need. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kamani N, Spellman S, Hurley CK, Barker JN, Smith FO, Oudshoorn M, Bray R, Smith A, Williams TM, Logan B, et al. State of the art review: HLA matching and outcome of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplants (Review) Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bradley MB, Cairo MS. Cord blood immunology and stem cell transplantation (Review) Hum Immunol. 2005;66:431–446. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2005.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Arora M, Nagaraj S, Wagner JE, Barker JN, Brunstein CG, Burns LJ, Defor TE, McMillan ML, Miller JS, Weisdorf DJ. Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) following unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): higher response rate in recipients of unrelated donor (URD) umbilical cord blood (UCB) Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:1145–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ballen KK, Spitzer TR, Yeap BY, McAfee S, Dey BR, Attar E, Haspel R, Kao G, Liney D, Alyea E, et al. Double unrelated reduced-intensity umbilical cord blood transplantation in adults. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.08.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Brunstein CG, Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, Defor TE, Miller JS, Blazar BR, McGlave PB, Wagner JE. Umbilical cord blood transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning: impact on transplantation outcomes in 110 adults with hematologic disease. Blood. 2007;110:3064–3070. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-04-067215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, Defor TE, Blazar BR, McGlave PB, Miller JS, Verfaillie CM, Wagner JE. Transplantation of 2 partially HLA-matched umbilical cord blood units to enhance engraftment in adults with hematologic malignancy. Blood. 2005;105:1343–1347. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jaroscak J, Goltry K, Smith A, Waters-Pick B, Martin PL, Driscoll TA, Howrey R, Chao N, Douville J, Burhop S, et al. Augmentation of umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation with ex vivo-expanded UCB cells: results of a phase 1 trial using the AastromReplicell System. Blood. 2003;101:5061–5067. doi: 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *43.Majhail NS, Brunstein CG, Tomblyn M, Thomas AJ, Miller JS, Arora M, Kaufman DS, Burns LJ, Slungaard A, McGlave PB, et al. Reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant in patients older than 55 years: unrelated umbilical cord blood is safe and effective for patients without a matched related donor. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.12.488. This study demonstrates that reduced intensity conditioning is both safe and effective for older adults undergoing cord blood transplantation. This option increases the availability of CBT to patients who otherwise are a high risk of regimen-related toxicity. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, Defor TE, Blazar BR, Miller JS, Wagner JE. Rapid and complete donor chimerism in adult recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning. Blood. 2003;102:1915–1919. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Koh LP, Chao NJ. Umbilical cord blood transplantation in adults using myeloablative and nonmyeloablative preparative regimens (Review) Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004;10:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2003.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Grewal SS, Barker JN, Davies SM, Wagner JE. Unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation: marrow or umbilical cord blood? (Review) Blood. 2003;101:4233–4244. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schoemans H, Theunissen K, Maertens J, Boogaerts M, Verfaillie C, Wagner J. Adult umbilical cord blood transplantation: a comprehensive review (Review) Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;38:83–93. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gluckman E, Rocha V. Donor selection for unrelated cord blood transplants (Review) Curr Opin Immunol. 2006;18:565–570. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2006.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wall DA, Chan KW. Selection of cord blood unit(s) for transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Majhail NS, Brunstein CG, Wagner JE. Double umbilical cord blood transplantation (Review) Curr Opin Immunol. 2006;18:571–575. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2006.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gluckman E, Rocha V, Arcese W, Michel G, Sanz G, Chan KW, Takahashi TA, Ortega J, Filipovich A, Locatelli F, et al. Factors associated with outcomes of unrelated cord blood transplant: guidelines for donor choice. Exp Hematol. 2004;32:397–407. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *52.Gluckman E, Rocha V, Ionescu I, Bierings M, Harris RE, Wagner J, Kurtzberg J, Champagne MA, Bonfim C, Bittencourt M, et al. Results of unrelated cord blood transplant in fanconi anemia patients: risk factor analysis for engraftment and survival. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:1073–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.05.015. In cord blood transplantation for Fanconi anemia, the cell dose of the cord blood unit and use of fludarabine in the conditioning regimen are associated with optimal transplant outcome. This study demonstrates the therapeutic potential of cord blood transplantation for this blood disorder. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rocha V, Gluckman E. Clinical use of umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12 (Suppl 1):34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.van Heeckeren WJ, Fanning LR, Meyerson HJ, Fu P, Lazarus HM, Cooper BW, Tse WW, Kindwall-Keller TL, Jaroscak J, Finney MR, et al. Influence of human leucocyte antigen disparity and graft lymphocytes on allogeneic engraftment and survival after umbilical cord blood transplant in adults. Br J Haematol. 2007;139:464–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kogler G, Enczmann J, Rocha V, Gluckman E, Wernet P. High-resolution HLA typing by sequencing for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, -DQ in 122 unrelated cord blood/patient pair transplants hardly improves long-term clinical outcome. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;36:1033–1041. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES