Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010 Oct;11(5):490–491. doi: 10.3109/17482961003716858

Public awareness of motor neuron disease

ZOE DAVIES 1, MARTIN R TURNER 2
PMCID: PMC3182549  EMSID: UKMS36053  PMID: 20672874

Abstract

A concerning lack of awareness of the symptoms and natural history of motor neuron disease was found in a street-based survey of 118 members of the general public.


Dear Sir

Motor neuron disease (MND, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) is a rare condition. The prevalence of MND in the south-east region of the UK was reported as approximately 5/100,000 (1). Those with MND require a large amount of community support that in some settings may need to be prioritized over more slowly progressive neurological disorders by individuals with variable levels of specialized knowledge. Anecdotally we have noted that many patients, and those who attend clinic with them at diagnosis, have very little understanding of MND, and community care managers may also lack understanding of the urgency for provision of support. Frequently there are misconceptions relating to other neurological disorders, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) or Parkinson’s disease (PD). We therefore sought to assess the general awareness of MND among the public outside the clinical setting.

Adults found along the main pedestrianized thoroughfare of central Oxford during the standard working hours of a weekday, were approached to answer a short series of questions concerning MND. They were asked to provide their age (categorized), and gender was also recorded. Verbal consent for publication of anonymized group results was taken prior to responses. For six of the MND related questions, respondents were asked to choose from a range of possible answers, with two further open questions concerning symptoms and famous people. Responses were collated and analysed using ‘freeware’ (www.surveymonkey.com).

There were 118 respondents with approximately equal gender representation and spread across a wide range of ages. The results are summarized in Table I. There were no significant variations in response with regard to gender or age group.

Table I.

Questions and response frequencies. Correct answers are highlighted.

Question Frequency
Gender
 Male 54%
 Female 46%
Age category (years)
 18–24 28%
 25–39 20%
 40–59 26%
 60–69 18%
 70+ 8%
What is the approximate number of MND patients
 in the UK at any one time?
 500 3%
 5000 31%
 50,000 38%
 500,000 9%
What is the commonest age group for people who
 develop MND?
 30–50 48%
 50–70 49%
 70+ 3%
What is the cause of MND?
 Genetic, i.e. it runs in families 42%
 Lifestyle factors, e.g. obesity, smoking, drugs 11%
 Infectious 9%
 It is not known 38%
Treatments for MND
 There is no effective treatment 27%
 There are effective treatments to halt progression 68%
 There is a cure 5%
What is the expected lifespan of a person with
 MND?
 Three years 21%
 10 years 63%
 Normal life expectancy 16%
MND and MS are different names for the same
 condition
  False 90%
  True 10%
Name a typical symptom of MND*
 Unable 24%
 Muscle symptoms, mobility problems 40%
 Speech difficulty 11%
 Shaking 9%
 Balance problems or incoordination 8%
 Memory impairment 4%
 Headache 3%
 Incontinence 1%
Name a famous person with MND*
 Unable 51%
 Stephen Hawking 33%
 David Niven 10%
 Michael J. Fox 3%
 Lou Gehrig 1%
 Willie Maddren 1%
 Christopher Reeve 1%
*

Open questions.

We confirmed a lack of public awareness of MND issues. Nearly half those asked reported a younger patient group being most commonly affected. More than two-thirds of respondents thought that there were effective treatments to halt MND progression, and nearly 80% that those diagnosed with MND generally had at least a 10-year or normal lifespan. One quarter of those asked could not name a single symptom of MND, with nearly 10% suggesting Parkinsonian features instead. Two-thirds of respondents had misconceptions about aetiology, with over 40% of the view that MND was essentially a familial, genetic disease.

Nearly all (90%) of those asked in our survey knew that MS was not a synonym for MND, although we did not seek to compare the specific understanding of other disorders (which might have revealed a generally poor awareness of neurological disease). A survey of 196 adult neurology patients and carers reported that epilepsy and dementia were “the most well known” neurological disorders presented, and MS “the least well known”, although MND was not included in this study (2). Surveys like ours undertaken in other countries might reveal cultural differences, e.g. greater awareness through Lou Gehrig as a famous person with MND in the USA.

We conclude that the devastating impact of MND is not well recognized by a representative sample of the general population of the UK, which may have a wider impact on healthcare planning and delivery for patients, as well as on governmental and charitable fund raising to support research. The MND Association UK recently launched a web-based campaign, with a simultaneous radio broad-cast by a high-profile patient, calling for a ‘National Strategy for MND’ to raise awareness of the unique care needs of the MND patient (see http://mnd2010.org/manifesto). This might serve as a practical model for other countries to adopt, in conjunction with the increased use of mass media to highlight individual patient experiences. Our study also suggested that MND might not be perceived as a disease of the elderly (compounded by probable under-ascertainment in this group by clinicians). With a globally ageing population, more active education of the public (and clinicians) about MND and other neurodegenerative disorders seems warranted.

Acknowledgments

MRT is supported by the MRC/MNDA Lady Edith Wolfson Clinician Scientist Fellowship. We wish to thank those members of the public who gave their time to participate in this survey.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper

References

  • 1.Abhinav K, Stanton B, Johnston C, Hardstaff J, Orrell RW, Howard R, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in south-east England: a population based study. The South-East England Register for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (SEALS Registry) Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29:44–8. doi: 10.1159/000108917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mavis I. Perspectives on public awareness of stroke and aphasia among Turkish patients in a neurology unit. Clin Linguist Phon. 2007;21:55–67. doi: 10.1080/02699200600903254. quiz, 70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES