Skip to main content
Annals of Family Medicine logoLink to Annals of Family Medicine
. 2011 Sep;9(5):423–430. doi: 10.1370/afm.1302

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use Among Persons With Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States

Laura Plantinga 1,2,, Vanessa Grubbs 1, Urmimala Sarkar 1,2, Chi-yuan Hsu 1, Elizabeth Hedgeman 3, Bruce Robinson 4, Rajiv Saran 3, Linda Geiss 5, Nilka Ríos Burrows 5, Mark Eberhardt 6, Neil Powe 1,2, For the CDC CKD Surveillance Team
PMCID: PMC3185478  PMID: 21911761

Abstract

PURPOSE

Because avoidance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is recommended for most individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), we sought to characterize patterns of NSAID use among persons with CKD in the United States.

METHODS

A total of 12,065 adult (aged 20 years or older) participants in the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999–2004) responded to a questionnaire regarding their use of over-the-counter and prescription NSAIDs. NSAIDs (excluding aspirin and acetaminophen) were defined by self-report. CKD was categorized as no CKD, mild CKD (stages 1 and 2; urinary albumin-creatinine ratio of ≥30 mg/g) and moderate to severe CKD (stages 3 and 4; estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15–59 mL/min/1.73 m2). Adjusted prevalence was calculated using multivariable logistic regression with appropriate population-based weighting.

RESULTS

Current use (nearly every day for 30 days or longer) of any NSAID was reported by 2.5%, 2.5%, and 5.0% of the US population with no, mild, and moderate to severe CKD, respectively; nearly all of the NSAIDs used were available over-the-counter. Among those with moderate to severe CKD who were currently using NSAIDs, 10.2% had a current NSAID prescription and 66.1% had used NSAIDs for 1 year or longer. Among those with CKD, disease awareness was not associated with reduced current NSAID use: (3.8% vs 3.9%, aware vs unaware; P=.979).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians and other health care clinicians should be aware of use of NSAIDs among those with CKD in the United States and evaluate NSAID use in their CKD patients.

Keywords: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, over-the-counter drugs, chronic kidney failure, medication errors

INTRODUCTION

Both over-the-counter and prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in the United States.1 General medicine textbooks24 and nephrology subspecialty consensus guidelines (National Kidney Foundation)5 recommend avoidance of NSAIDs (except aspirin and acetaminophen) for most patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Persons with CKD, however, are likely unaware of their disease6 and may also be unaware that NSAIDs should be avoided. Additionally, those with CKD are likely to be older and have multiple comorbid conditions or symptoms that lead to increased use of NSAIDs.7

NSAIDs have been associated both with acute kidney injury in the general population8 and with disease progression in those with CKD.9 For those with CKD, the further decrease in volume of renal blood flow resulting from decreased prostaglandin synthesis can lead to acute kidney injury, sodium retention, edema, hypertension, and hyperkalemia.10 Acute interstitial nephritis can cause kidney damage and reduced renal function in a small percentage of NSAID users.11 Habitual NSAID abuse can lead to analgesic nephropathy, a condition that is often irreversible upon drug discontinuation.12 Additionally, NSAIDs interact unfavorably with some commonly prescribed medications, including loop diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers, leading to reduced effectiveness, along with increased risk of renal impairment.13,14 Although epidemiologic studies have linked NSAID use to progressive CKD,15 the risks of NSAIDs in patients with CKD, while supported by consensus and theoretical effect, remain less clearly established by evidence.

Despite the potential adverse renal effects of NSAIDs, little is known about the patterns of NSAID use among those with CKD in community settings. Here we estimate the prevalence and describe patterns of self-reported NSAID use among adults by CKD status using data from the community-based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

METHODS

Study Design

We conducted a cross-sectional study of participants from NHANES, which consists of standardized in-home interviews and physical examinations and specimen collections at mobile examination centers of representative samples of noninstitutionalized US civilian residents.16 A complex, multistage, probability sampling design was used, with oversampling of certain subpopulations to increase reliability of estimates. Response rates for participants completing both the interview and examination were 76% (1999–2000), 80% (2001–2002), and 76% (2003–2004), for a total of 14,213 participants.

There were 12,065 NHANES 1999–2004 participants (n = 3,753, 4,297, and 4,015 for 1999–2000, 2001–2002, and 2003–2004, respectively) who were aged 20 years or older, responded to the analgesic questionnaire, and had available serum creatinine and urine albumin and creatinine measurements; exclusions were pregnancy and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Figure 1). All participants gave written informed consent. The protocol was approved by the National Center for Health Statistics Research Ethics Review Board.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of cumulative study participant exclusions.

eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate; NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Measurements

During the interview, participants reported on current and past use of specific over-the-counter and prescription analgesic pain relievers via a computer-assisted personal interviewing system. Additionally, participants were asked to provide bottles of all prescription medications taken within the past month for recording by interviewers. Self-reported information on demographics (age, sex, and race/ethnicity), socioeconomic status and health care access (education and income), and diagnosed diseases and conditions was also obtained during the interview.

Height, weight, and blood pressure were measured, and samples were collected during the examination. Serum creatinine was measured by the modified kinetic method of Jaffe and corrected for different analyzers as specified in NHANES documentation.17,18 Urine albumin and creatinine were measured using solid-phase fluorescence immunoassay and the modified Jaffe kinetic method, respectively.

Definitions

CKD

Patients’ CKD status was defined by single measurements of kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) and albuminuria (albumin:creatinine ratio [ACR]), as follows: no CKD, eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and ACR ≤30 mg/g; stages 1 and 2 (mild CKD), eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and ACR ≥30 mg/g; and stages 3 and 4 (moderate to severe CKD), eGFR 15–59 mL/min/1.73 m2. eGFR was calculated according to the modified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation for calibrated creatinine was eGFR = 175 × [(calibrated serum creatinine in mg/dL)−1.154] × age−0.203 × (0.742 if female) × (1.210 if African-American).19

NSAID Use

Current use of NSAIDs was defined by self-reported use of ibuprofen, naproxen, sulindac, piroxicam, indomethacin, tolmetin, or diclofenac (with brand names and combination formulas identified) daily or nearly every day for the last 30 days (Figure 2). Number of pills or doses per day were also collected on those reporting current use. Long-term use was defined by use for 1 year or longer (Figure 2). Current NSAID prescriptions were identified in the prescription medication database. Although the questionnaire assessed the use of aspirin and acetaminophen, these medications were excluded from our primary definitions of NSAID use because of their relatively low nephrotoxicity and recommended use for pain (acetaminophen) or for the prevention of comorbid cardiovascular disease (aspirin) in the setting of known CKD.20

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Questionnaire items and study definitions for reported over-the-counter and prescription NSAID use, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004.

NSAID=nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Covariates

Comorbid diseases were defined by self-reported diagnosis. Self-reported cardiovascular disease was defined by diagnosed coronary artery disease, angina, myocardial infarction, stroke, or congestive heart failure. Hypertension was defined by self-report, self-reported use of anti-hypertensive medications, or by measured systolic or diastolic blood pressure of ≥140 or ≥90 mm Hg, respectively. Obesity was defined by a measured body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m2. CKD awareness was defined as a yes answer to “Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you have weak or failing kidneys?” Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers included captopril, enalapril, fosinopril, lisinopril, candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, losartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, and valsartan; loop diuretics included furosemide, torsemide, and bumetanide (prescriptions for ethacrynic acid were not reported).

Statistical Methods

Unweighted characteristics of patients were calculated and compared by CKD status. Unadjusted and adjusted weighted prevalence estimates of current NSAID use were calculated by CKD category, and variance of proportions was estimated with Taylor series linearization. Sensitivity analyses with definition of reduced kidney function by the CKD-EPI equation,21 with further adjustment for additional covariates, and with stratification by arthritis were performed. All weighted analyses were performed using the SVY commands in Stata 10.0 (College Station, Texas) to account for study design weights, strata, and primary sampling units. Statistical significance was set at P <.05.

RESULTS

Participant Characteristics

The NHANES participants with CKD were older, more likely to be female and non-Hispanic black, and more likely to have lower income and educational attainment than their counterparts without CKD (Table 1). With US population-based weighting, trends were similar to those seen in the unweighted results in Table 1, except that the non-Hispanic black and white populations were similarly likely to have CKD (data not shown).

Table 1.

Characteristics of Study Participants, by Chronic Kidney Disease Status, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004

CKD Statusa
Characteristic Overall No CKDb Mild CKDc Moderate-Severe CKDd
No. (%) participants 12,065 (100) 9,604 (79.6) 1,137 (9.4) 1,324 (11.0)
Sociodemographic
Age, mean (SD) y 51.0 (18.7) 47.2 (17.2) 57.5 (18.0) 72.9 (11.8)
Sex, %
 Male 51.6 53.4 46.6 48.7
 Female 48.4 46.6 53.4 51.3
Race/ethnicity, %e
 Non-Hispanic white 40.1 41.3 37.6 37.7
 Non-Hispanic black 24.8 23.5 24.6 28.2
 Mexican-American 25.5 25.7 27.1 24.7
Household Income, %
 <$20,000 25.7 23.7 31.1 29.3
 $20,000–44,999 32.9 32.6 33.6 33.5
 $45,000–74,999 20.6 21.3 19.1 19.3
 >$75,000 20.8 22.4 16.2 18.0
Education, %
 Less than high school 49.5 43.0 53.0 68.3
 High school graduate 50.5 57.0 47.1 31.7
Clinical
BMI ≥30 kg/m2, %
 No 75.8 73.0 69.1 85.3
 Yes 24.2 27.0 30.9 14.7
Diabetes (self-reported), %
 No 93.2 95.0 80.6 92.7
 Yes 6.8 5.0 19.5 7.4
Hypertension (self-reported, use of medications, or ≥140/90 mm Hg), %
 No 50.3 60.9 37.1 19.4
 Yes 49.7 39.1 62.9 80.6
Cardiovascular disease (self-reported), %
 No 88.1 92.3 82.2 71.5
 Yes 11.9 7.7 17.8 28.5
Cancer (self-reported), %
 No 90.8 92.8 89.8 81.4
 Yes 9.3 7.2 10.2 18.7
Arthritis (self-reported), %
 No 72.4 76.6 65.0 56.2
 Yes 27.6 23.4 35.0 43.8
Last visit to health care clinician, %
 >1 y ago 17.0 18.9 14.0 13.3
 Within last year 83.0 81.1 86.0 86.8
ACEI or ARB prescription, %
 No 95.5 96.1 92.1 95.0
 Yes 4.5 3.9 7.9 5.0
Loop diuretic prescription, %
 No 97.7 98.9 95.8 95.3
 Yes 2.3 1.1 4.2 4.7
CKD awareness, %
 No 92.5 95.6 89.8
 Yes 7.5 4.4 10.2

ACR = albumin-creatinine ratio; ACEI = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI = body mass index; CKD = chronic kidney disease; eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Note: Estimates are unweighted study population (not US population) estimates.

a

P <.001 for all comparisons across CKD status, by analysis of variance (continuous variables) and χ2 (categorical variables).

b

ACR ≤30 mg/g, eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

c

Stages 1 and 2 (ACR ≥30 mg/g).

d

Stages 3 and 4 (eGFR 15–59 mL/min/1.73 m2)

e

Other race excluded from analysis of race/ethnicity because of small n, but individuals from this group are included in other comparisons.

Prevalence of Reported NSAID Use by Patients With CKD

Reported Current NSAID Use

Reported current use of NSAIDs was not uncommon in the US population (3.7% overall). Persons with moderate to severe CKD were slightly more likely than those with no or mild CKD to report current use of NSAIDs (Figure 3A). The great majority of currently used NSAIDs were available over-the-counter (Figure 3A). Among those with CKD, current NSAID use was similar among those were aware and those who were unaware of their CKD status (5.7% vs 5.0%, P = .80).

Figures 3A and B.

Figures 3A and B

Figures 3A and B

Crude reported use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the US population by chronic kidney disease status, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004.

CKD=chronic kidney disease; NSAID=nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; OTC = over-the-counter; Rx=prescription.

Note: P >.05 across CKD categories by χ2, except where indicated. OTC drugs included ibuprofen and naproxen; Rx-only drugs included sulindac, piroxicam, indomethacin, tolmetin, diclofenac, celecoxib, and rofecoxib. Prescription NSAIDs included ibuprofen, naproxen, sulindac, piroxicam, indomethacin, tolmetin, diclofenac, nimesulide, meclofenamate, etodolac, ketorolac, flurbiprofen, and ketoprofen.

a Unreliable estimates because of small sample sizes.

More than two-thirds (65.7%) of current NSAIDs users also reported long-term use of NSAIDs (1 year or longer), and the prevalence of ever reporting long-term use did not differ by current CKD status (Figure 3B). The mean number of pills or doses per day among current NSAID users was 3.0, 3.3, and 2.6 for no, mild, and moderate to severe CKD, respectively (P=.34).

Current NSAID Prescriptions

Of those reporting current NSAID use, 19.4% also had a current prescription for a NSAID, with higher prevalence among those with no CKD (21.8%) vs mild (10.7%) or moderate to severe (9.8%) CKD (Figure 3B). Regardless of self-reported current NSAID use, 11.4% of those with moderate to severe CKD reported a NSAID prescription compared with 7.6% for mild CKD (P=.007).

Other Current Prescriptions

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers were reported for 9.3% of current NSAID users (19.4% and 19.1% for mild and moderate to severe CKD, respectively). In addition, 3.7% of current NSAIDs users had prescriptions for loop diuretics (17.8% for moderate to severe CKD). Among participants with CKD stage 3 or 4 who reported prescriptions for NSAIDs, 15.7% and 20.4% also had prescriptions for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and loop diuretics.

Sensitivity Analyses

The distribution of reported current NSAID use by CKD defined by the CKD-EPI equation21 did not differ substantially from those who reported using the MDRD Study equation (data not shown). Adjustment for demographics and clinical conditions did not substantially change the results (data not shown). Stratified analyses showed that, although current NSAID use was substantially higher among those with arthritis, the association of greater prevalence of NSAID use among those with CKD stage 3 or 4, relative to those with earlier stage or no CKD, did not differ by arthritis status (no arthritis: 2.5%, 2.8%, and 3.4% NSAID use for no CKD, CKD stage 1 and 2, and CKD stage 3 and 4, respectively; arthritis, 7.6%, 7.7%, and 8.1% NSAID use; Pinteraction = .85 and .47 for CKD stage 1 or 2 and stage 3 or 4, respectively).

DISCUSSION

We found that current use of NSAIDs, particularly those available over-the-counter, was low but not rare in the US population with CKD, with more than 5% of those with moderate to severe CKD reporting currently using NSAIDs regularly. At a population level, this percentage reflects up to 870,000 persons in the United States with advanced CKD who are using NSAIDs. The prevalence of current NSAID use in the general population did not differ substantially by CKD status, and two-thirds of all current users had used NSAIDs for at least 1 year. Current prescriptions for NSAIDs were also common overall and in those with CKD (~10%), possibly reflecting the lack of both clinician awareness of CKD status and possible adverse effects of NSAIDs in patients with CKD who have additional competing indications for NSAID use (eg, chronic pain). Many of those with CKD who had prescriptions for NSAIDs also had prescriptions for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (~16%) and loop diuretics (~20%), the therapeutic action of which is inhibited by NSAIDs.10 Not surprisingly, NSAID use was greater among those who had arthritis compared with those who did not.

Informed Decision Making Regarding NSAID Use in the Setting of CKD

Our findings suggest that there may be large numbers of individuals with CKD, many of whom unaware of their disease,6 who may be at risk for further kidney injury through use of NSAIDs. Awareness not only of CKD status but also of necessary behavioral modifications, including recommended NSAID avoidance or restriction, is important to avoid CKD progression. We found no evidence that those who were aware of their CKD were less likely to use NSAIDs over the long term than were those who were unaware, suggesting that awareness of recommended NSAID avoidance in CKD is not associated with awareness of CKD itself. We also found that many of those with prescriptions for NSAIDs had prescriptions for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers or loop diuretics as well. The nephrotoxicity of and potential interactions with these drugs may need to be more clearly communicated to primary care clinicians, other prescribers of medications for pain management, and the community. This communication is important to those individuals who self-manage pain with over-the-counter NSAIDs, given that explicit labeling regarding the potential renal risks of the over-the-counter ibuprofen and naproxen, as has been recommended,20 is not required.

It is important to note that, although there is general consensus that NSAIDs should be avoided in CKD, the evidence supporting this belief remains mixed. In the 1990s, case-control studies22,23 indicated that the risk of progression to end-stage renal disease was increased in those who took NSAIDs. Cohort studies have shown that up to 13% to 18% of elderly and hospitalized patients24,25 develop acute renal failure in response to NSAIDs, and elderly high-dose NSAID users had a 26% increased risk of progression.9 More recent cohort studies show that long-term NSAID use may have either no26,27 or moderate28 effect on the renal function of healthy men and women. The concept of classic analgesic nephropathy29 has now been largely attributed to abuse of phenacetin-containing analgesic mixtures,30 which are no longer available in the United States, Australia, and most of Western Europe but continue to be associated with CKD and end-stage renal disease in countries where such mixtures are available.31

This contradictory body of evidence may be one contributing factor to the continuing use of NSAIDs among persons with CKD. Common conditions with indications for NSAID use, particularly arthritis, may be more bothersome and limiting to overall quality of life than coexisting CKD, which is often without symptoms before end-stage renal disease. Indeed, we found that current NSAID use was 2- to 5-fold higher among those with arthritis compared with those without arthritis, regardless of CKD status. Thus, although primary care and general medicine textbooks24 and clinical practice guidelines5 recommend avoidance of NSAIDs for most CKD patients, clinicians are advised to consider the risks and benefits on a case-by-case basis, with determination and consideration of their patients’ CKD status and over-the-counter NSAID use. For example, for a patient with pain caused by arthritis or other conditions, the potential risk of CKD progression resulting from NSAID use may be outweighed by improved patient quality of life. Such trade-offs must be considered.

Study Limitations

First, although we can show that high-risk use of NSAIDs is common among those with CKD, no causal inference can be drawn. Also, acute kidney injury cannot be distinguished from CKD in a cross-sectional study. CKD status before the NHANES survey is unknown, so only current NSAID use can be examined in relation to CKD. Second, our main definition did not include the most commonly used over-the-counter analgesics—acetaminophen and aspirin—because of their relatively low nephrotoxicity and indications for pain and cardiovascular prevention, respectively. Even though prolonged, high-dose use of acetaminophen23,28 or aspirin may be nephrotoxic, however, they are recommended as analgesics in the setting of CKD. Third, participants with chronic pain may over-or underestimate the duration and frequency of NSAID use or may not recognize medications as NSAIDs; reporting could also be biased by psychosocial reasons (eg, attention-seeking behavior or embarrassment). We did not have information on indication, clinician recommendation, or detailed dosage and frequency. Fourth, there is the possibility of CKD misclassification, particularly for earlier stages. Data from more recent NHANES (2005–2008) did not include information on NSAID use, somewhat limiting the generalizability of the results to current practices. Finally, information on comorbid conditions was self-reported and, likely, underreported.

In summary, reported current use of NSAIDs in the United States is low, but it is as common among those with CKD as in those without CKD, even among those who are aware of their CKD. Primary care physicians, who are likely to manage both early-stage CKD and indications for NSAID use, should be aware of the rates of NSAID (both prescribed and over-the-counter) use, assess the risk of NSAID use in each patient, and, most importantly, engage each patient in informed decision making about the risks and benefits of NSAID use. CKD screening in those who use NSAIDs daily and effective communication of the risks of NSAID use among those with CKD may be warranted to prevent further kidney damage and progression of disease.

Acknowledgments

The CDC CKD Surveillance Team consists of members from University of California, San Francisco (Neil Powe, Laura Plantinga, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Josef Coresh, Alan Go, Chi-yuan Hsu, Lesley Inker, Deidra Crews, Vanessa Grubb, Delphine Tuot, Seena Nair); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Rajiv Saran, Elizabeth Hedgeman, Brenda Gillespie, William Herman, Freidrich Port, Bruce Robinson, Vahakn Shahinian, Jerry Yee, Eric Young); and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (Desmond Williams, Nilka Ríos Burrows, Mark Eberhardt, Paul Eggers, Nicole Flowers, Linda Geiss, Susan Hailpern, Regina Jordan, Juanita Mondesire, Bernice Moore, Gary Myers, Meda Pavkov, Deborah Rolka, Sharon Saydah, Anton Schoolwerth, Rodolfo Valdez, Larry Waller).

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: B. Robinson received grants in the last 3 years from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Genzyme Corporation, and Kyowa Hakko Kirin; all other authors report none.

Disclaimer: Publication and report contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the AAMC or CDC.

This work was presented in part at the American Society of Nephrology annual meeting, November 18–21, 2010, in Denver, Colorado.

Funding support: This project was supported under a cooperative agreement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), grant number 5U36CD319276, AAMC identification number MM-1143-10/10. Dr. Powe is partially supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (grant K24DK02643).

References

  • 1.Paulose-Ram R, Hirsch R, Dillon C, Losonczy K, Cooper M, Ostchega Y. Prescription and non-prescription analgesic use among the US adult population: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12(4):315–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goroll AH, Mulley AG, Jr, eds. Primary Care Medicine: Office Evaluation and Management of the Adult Patient. 6th ed Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barker LR, Zieve PD, eds. Principles of Ambulatory Medicine. 7th ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fauci AS, ed. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 17th ed New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Kidney Foundation Kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (K/DOQI). http://www.kidney.org/professionals/doqi
  • 6.Plantinga LC, Boulware LE, Coresh J, et al. Patient awareness of chronic kidney disease: trends and predictors. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(20):2268–2275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nayak-Rao S. Achieving effective pain relief in patients with chronic kidney disease: A review of analgesics in renal failure. J Nephrol. 2010; 24(1):5–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Huerta C, Castellsague J, Varas-Lorenzo C, García Rodríguez LA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of ARF in the general population. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45(3):531–539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gooch K, Culleton BF, Manns BJ, et al. NSAID use and progression of chronic kidney disease. Am J Med. 2007;120(3):280, e1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Clive DM, Stoff JS. Renal syndromes associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med. 1984;310(9):563–572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rossert J. Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. [nephrology forum]. Kidney Int. 2001;60(2):804–817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guo X, Nzerue C. How to prevent, recognize, and treat drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002;69(4):289–290, 293,–294, 296–297 passim. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moser M, Setaro JF. Clinical practice. Resistant or difficult-to-control hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):385–392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Setaro JF, Black HR. Refractory hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327(8):543–547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.De Broe ME, Elseviers MM. Over-the-counter analgesic use. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(10):2098–2103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999–2004. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes_questionnaires.htm [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Selvin E, Manzi J, Stevens LA, et al. Calibration of serum creatinine in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 1988–1994, 1999–2004. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50(6):918–926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Analytic and Reporting Guidelines: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2003-2004/analytical_guidelines.htm [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Expressing the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standardized serum creatinine values. Clin Chem. 2007;53(4):766–772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Henrich WL, Agodoa LE, Barrett B, et al. Analgesics and the kidney: Summary and recommendations to the scientific advisory board of the National Kidney Foundation from an ad hoc committee of the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996;27(1): 162–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sandler DP, Burr FR, Weinberg CR. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk for chronic renal disease. Ann Intern Med. 1991; 115(3):165–172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Perneger TV, Whelton PK, Klag MJ. Risk of kidney failure associated with the use of acetaminophen, aspirin, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(25):1675–1679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Murray MD, Brater DC, Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Ibuprofen-associated renal impairment in a large general internal medicine practice. Am J Med Sci. 1990;299(4):222–229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gurwitz JH, Avorn J, Ross-Degnan D, Lipsitz LA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated azotemia in the very old. JAMA. 1990;264(4):471–475 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rexrode KM, Buring JE, Glynn RJ, Stampfer MJ, Youngman LD, Gaziano JM. Analgesic use and renal function in men. JAMA. 2001;286(3):315–321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kurth T, Glynn RJ, Walker AM, et al. Analgesic use and change in kidney function in apparently healthy men. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003; 42(2):234–244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Curhan GC, Knight EL, Rosner B, Hankinson SE, Stampfer MJ. Lifetime nonnarcotic analgesic use and decline in renal function in women. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(14):1519–1524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bennett WM, DeBroe ME. Analgesic nephropathy—a preventable renal disease. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(19):1269–1271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mihatsch MJ, Khanlari B, Brunner FP. Obituary to analgesic nephropathy—an autopsy study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006; 21(11):3139–3145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pintér I, Mátyus J, Czégány Z, et al. Analgesic nephropathy in Hungary: the HANS study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(4):840–843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Family Medicine are provided here courtesy of Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

RESOURCES