Abstract
The synthesis and characterization of a deep cavitand bearing a fluorescent benzoquinoxaline wall is reported. Non-covalent host-guest recognition events are exploited to sense small charged molecules including acetylcholine. The cavitand also exhibits an anion dependent change in fluorescence that is used to differentiate halide ions in solution.
Developing sensors for biologically relevant ions and small molecules is a timely topic of research.1 The versatility and sensitivity of photoluminescence has made it a favorite readout of sensor systems. Photophysical properties of luminescent molecules can be fine-tuned through a number of different interactions such as heavy atom effects, electron-, proton- and energy-transfer processes, destabilization of excited states and changes in electron density.2 These interactions can quench (“turn-off”) or enhance (“turn-on”) the intensity of the fluorescent emission; these processes have been studied in many cavitands and capsules.3 Numerous fluorescent sensors have been reported and different analytes are targeted through covalent bonding or non-covalent interactions.4 The controlled micro-environments of host molecules makes them appealing choices to sense analytes through non-covalent interactions. In particular, fluorescence spectroscopy and cavitand molecules offer unique opportunities to study non-covalent recognition processes. One approach has been to use the displacement indicator method5 with non-fluorescent cavitands in combination with fluorescent guests.6 Another method showed that calix[4]arenes with pyrene substituents appended to the lower rim exhibited changes in excimer emission upon guest binding.7 Other calixarenes and resorcinarenes with fluorophores appended to the periphery have been shown to function as sensors.8 Recently, a resorcin[4]arene with four organoboron “walls” was reported to exhibit hypsochromic shift upon guest binding.9 Here we detail an approach where the fluorescent functionality is one of the walls of a deep cavitand host, in which the guest analyte is placed in direct contact with the fluorophore. Upon guest binding the cavitand displays a bathochromic shift and anion dependent change in fluorescence.
Cavitand 1 was synthesized in one step from known hexa-amide cavitand 3.10 The fourth wall is attached to the cavitand by two nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions between 2,3-dichlorobenzoquinoxaline and the free phenols on 3 (Figure 1). Cavitand 1 features six amides positioned on the upper rim of the cavitand which form intramolecular hydrogen bonds; stabilizing the vase conformation. The fluorescent benzoquinoxaline completes the cavitand’s concave structure and functions as the spectroscopic signal for host-guest studies. A control molecule (2), featuring the benzoquinoxaline functionality without the well-defined molecular space of cavitand 1 was also synthesized (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Synthesis of Cavitand 1 (top). Control and guest molecules (bottom).
1H NMR spectra in CDCl3 reveal that cavitand 1 adopts a folded vase conformation but with broadened signals (Figure 2, bottom). This suggests a dynamic behavior different from that of the parent octa-amide system.11 The fluxional behavior of cavitand 1 is a result of the extended benzoquinoxaline wall and the absence of two amide substituents. Interestingly, the addition of a guest molecule such as acetylcholine chloride (4) results in sharper signals characteristic of a kinetically stable complex (Figure 2, top).
Figure 2.
Select portions of the 1H NMR spectrum of cavitand 1 in CDCl3 at 300 K (bottom) and in the presence of acetylcholine chloride (4) (top). A CAChe MM3 minimized model of 1 and acetylcholine is provided in the upper left inset.
Cavitand 1 and control 2 display similar spectroscopic properties dictated by the benzoquinoxaline fluorophore. Both molecules are characterized by a broad absorbance centered at 365 nm that tails into the visible region resulting in yellow compounds. The green fluorescence of the 2,3-dichlorobenzoquinoxaline starting material is shifted to a blue fluorescence once integrated into compounds 1 and 2. When excited at 365 nm these molecules emit a broad emission centered at 460 nm with quantum yields of ΦF = 0.24 for cavitand 1 and ΦF = 0.19 for control 2. The structured microenvironment of the cavitand improves the quantum yield of this fluorophore. The characteristic blue fluorescence of these molecules is used to probe host-guest interactions in this system.
Cavitand 1 functions as a sensor for alkyl ammonium salts that are small enough to complement the receptor cavity. The addition of five equivalents of acetylcholine chloride (4) to a CHCl3 solution of cavitand 1 produces a bathochromic shift and increase in fluorescence. The change in emission is attributed to the proximity of the cation and anion to the fluorophore (see below). A titration with this analyte results in isosbestic conversion (SI). The fluorescence of control molecule 2 is not altered by the same addition of guest, highlighting the necessity of the host-guest interaction (Figure 3). Tetra-N-butylammonium bromide—which does not fit into 1— had minimal effect on the fluorescence spectrum (See SI).
Figure 3.
Acetylcholine chloride (4) induced fluorescence enhancement of cavitand 1 (left) and static fluorescene of control 2 (right, red and blue lines overlap completely) in CHCl3 at 298 K.
Fluorescent sensors for anions are increasingly studied.12 The guest binding and emission of 1 are dependent on the guest counter anion. To study this dependence we turned to N-propylquinuclidinium halide guests. 1H NMR and NOESY spectra reveal that N-propylquinuclidinum binds to 1 with the propyl group directed towards the open end of the cavitand. The association constants of N-propylquinuclidinium guests 5-7 are 8.0×103 M−1 for 5, 4.9×103 M−1 for 6 and 2.3×103 M−1 for 7. This trend is in accord with the most basic chloride forming the strongest hydrogen bonds with the amide protons on the upper rim of 1. The 1H NMR of these complexes corroborate this assertion with the greatest downfield shifts of the amide protons observed for the complex with 5 (Figure 4, bottom).
Figure 4.
Select regions of the 1H NMR spectra of cavitand 1 in CDCl3 with 2 equiv each of N-propylquinuclidinium iodide (top), bromide (middle), chloride (bottom). The shifted hydrogen bonding amide protons are noted by blue circles.
The fluorescence spectrum of 1 also showed a strong dependence on the counter anion of the guest.13 Emission spectra were obtained for cavitand 1 with guests 5-7 (Figure 5). The chloride guest (5) produced an increase in fluorescence, while the bromide guest (6) led only to a small increase. Iodide is well known for its fluorescence quenching capability14 and the iodide guest (7) resulted in a significant decrease in fluorescence which is likely due to a collisional quenching process of the excited state. The addition of other iodide salts to the cavitand (N-methylquinuclidinium iodide or N-propyl-N-methylpiperidinium iodide) also resulted in a decrease in fluorescence. The changes in emission are likely due to subtle effects from both the cation and anion. The cation binds to the host which rigidifies the structure and reduces the non-radiative energy transfer. Additionally, the close proximity of the cationic charge polarizes the environment around the fluorophore resulting in altered emission. The anions collisionally quench fluorescence to varying degrees depending on their location and association with the upper rim of the cavitand. This interplay results in a balance between emission enhancement and quenching ultimately dictated by anion.
Figure 5.
Anion dependent fluorescence of cavitand 1 in CHCl3. N-propylquinuclidinium chloride (5, green line) and bromide (6, red line) both produce fluorescence enhancement while N-propylquinuclidinium iodide (7, purple line) quenches fluorescence.
In conclusion, we report a deep cavitand containing a fluorescent benzoquinoxaline as one of the walls. The cavitand displays fluxional behavior in chloroform but complexes kinetically stable on the NMR timescale are formed when good guests are introduced. The end result is a deep cavitand that functions as a fluorescent sensor for ions. Future studies will explore other guest molecules for selective recognition.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
This work was financially supported by the NIGMS (GM27953). A Ruth L. Kirschstein Postdoctoral fellowship for O.B.B. was provided by the NIH (F32GM087068). A.C.S. is a Skaggs Pre-doctoral Fellow.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available. Experimental procedures, UV-vis, fluorescence studies and NMR data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org
References
- (1).(a) Kikuchi K. Adv. Biochem. Engin/Biotechnol. 2010;119:63–78. doi: 10.1007/10_2008_42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Carrol CN, Naleway JJ, Haley MM, Johnson DW. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:3875–3888. doi: 10.1039/b926231h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Lemke EA, Schultz C. Nature Chemical Biology. 2011;7:480–483. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).(a) Prodi L. New J. Chem. 2005;29:20–31. [Google Scholar]; (b) Montalti M, Credi A, Prodi L, Gandolfi MT. Handbook of Photochemistry. 3rd edn CRC Taylor &Francis; Boca Raton: 2006. [Google Scholar]; (c) Biavardi E, Battistini G, Montalti M, Yebeutchou RM, Prodi L, Dalcanale E. Chem. Commun. 2008:1638–1640. doi: 10.1039/b801729h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Berryman O, Dube H, Rebek J., Jr. Israel J. Chem. 2011;51:700–709. doi: 10.1002/ijch.201100055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).(a) Jun ME, Roy B, Ahn KH. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:7583–7601. doi: 10.1039/c1cc00014d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chen Y, Liu Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:495–505. doi: 10.1039/b816354p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Mohr GJ. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2006;386:1201–1214. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-0647-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Wiskur S, Ait-Haddou H, Anslyn E, Lavigne J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001;34:963–972. doi: 10.1021/ar9600796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).(a) Bakirci H, Nau WM. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006;16:237–242. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bakirci H, Koner AL, Nau WM. Chem. Commun. 2005:5411–5413. doi: 10.1039/b510319c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Miskolczy Z, Biczók L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009;477:80–84. [Google Scholar]; (d) Ballester P, Sarmentero MA. 2006;8:3477–3480. doi: 10.1021/ol061097i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Megyesi M, Biczók L. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010;114:2814–2819. doi: 10.1021/jp910418k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Megyesi M, Biczók L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006;424:71–76. [Google Scholar]
- (7).Aoki I, Sakaki T, Tsutsui S, Shinkai S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992;33:89–92. [Google Scholar]
- (8).(a) Kim SK, Moon B-S, Park JH, Seo YI, Koa HS, Yoon YJ, Lee KD, Yoon J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:6617–6620. [Google Scholar]; (b) Jang YJ, Moon B-S, Park MS, Kang B-G, Kwon JY, Hong JSJ, Yoon YJ, Lee KD, Yoon J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:2707–2710. [Google Scholar]; (c) Shirtcliff LD, Xu H, Diederich F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010:846–855. [Google Scholar]; (d) Azov VA, Schlegel A, Diederich F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005;44:4635–4638. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Azov V, Schlegel A, Diederich F. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2006;12:1926–1940. [Google Scholar]; (f) Maffei F, Betti P, Genovese D, Montalti M, Prodi L, Zorzi RD, Geremia S, Dalcanale E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:4654–4657. doi: 10.1002/anie.201100738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Middel O, Verboom W, Reinhoudt DN. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:3998–4005. doi: 10.1021/jo010107k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Kubo Y, Tsuruzoe K, Okuyama S, Nishiyabu R, Fujihara T. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:3604–3606. doi: 10.1039/c0cc00259c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Renslo AR, Tucci FC, Rudkevich DM, Rebek J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:4573–4582. [Google Scholar]
- (11).(a) Rudkevich DM, Hilmersson G, Rebek J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:9911–9912. [Google Scholar]; (b) Rudkevich DM, Hilmersson G, Rebek J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:12216–12225. [Google Scholar]
- (12).Martinez-Máñez R, Sancenón F. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:4419–4476. doi: 10.1021/cr010421e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).The UV-Vis spectra on the other hand showed negligible dependence on the counter anion (see SI).
- (14).Ide G, Engelborghs Y. The J. Biological Chem. 1981;256:11684–11687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






