Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2011 Oct;193(19):5596–5597. doi: 10.1128/JB.05670-11

Complete Genome Sequence of the Ureolytic Streptococcus salivarius Strain 57.I

Jianing Geng 1, Szu-Chuan Huang 2, Shuangli Li 1, Songnian Hu 1, Yi-Ywan M Chen 2,3,*
PMCID: PMC3187406  PMID: 21914897

Abstract

Streptococcus salivarius 57.I is one of the most abundant and highly ureolytic bacteria in the human mouth. It can utilize urea as the sole nitrogen source via the activity of urease. Complete genome sequencing of S. salivarius 57.I revealed a chromosome and a phage which are absent in strain SK126.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Streptococcus salivarius, a member of the salivarius group of the viridans group streptococci, is one of the early colonizers of the epithelium and a common isolate of the human oral cavity (10). When S. salivarius gains entrance to the bloodstream, it may cause severe systemic infections (13). Although not all S. salivarius strains synthesize urease, the ureolytic activity of S. salivarius strain 57.I is the major alkali generation machinery in the oral cavity that plays an essential role in maintaining oral pH homeostasis and balancing dental plaque ecology (5, 17). Here we report the complete genome and annotation of the ureolytic strain 57.I and compared the genome with that of strain SK126.

The complete genome sequence of S. salivarius strain 57.I was determined via a whole-genome shotgun approach employing Roche 454 pyrosequencing on a GS-FLX at 454 Life Sciences. A total of 272,194 high-quality reads were assembled by using Roche's Newbler assembler with approximately 50× sequence coverage of the entire genome. The order of the contigs was arranged initially based on the gene order of S. salivarius strain SK126 chromosome (ACLO00000000), and the gaps between contigs were then finished by the multiplex PCR and primer walking method. The resulting sequence was edited by the phred/phrap/consed software package (8, 9, 11, 12). The protein-coding genes, tRNAs, and rRNA were predicted by Glimmer 3.0, tRNA-SE, and RNAmmer (7, 14, 15), respectively. The functions of all genes were predicted by searching against the NCBI nonredundant protein database, cluster of orthologous groups (COGs), and InterProScan, and the metabolic pathways were reconstructed by using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (1, 16, 18).

The genome has one circular DNA molecule with a GC content of 39.93% and one phage DNA with a 41.24% GC content. The chromosome DNA is 2,138,805 bp in length, carrying 1,942 predicted open reading frames (ORFs), 68 predicted tRNA genes encoding all 20 amino acids, and 6 rRNA operons containing 5S, 16S, and 23S RNA genes. Additionally, there are two clusters of regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and two potential CRISPRs in the chromosome. The phage DNA is 40,758 bp in length and encodes 55 proteins. Comparative genomic analysis of S. salivarius strains 57.I and SK126 revealed 164 ORFs that are unique in S. salivarius strain 57.I. These genes include the ure operon of 11 genes, encoding all proteins required for assembly of a functional urease (2, 3, 6), the cadDX operon, encoding a system for cadmium and zinc resistance (4), and a cluster of genes encoding sugar transferases involved in extracellular polysaccharide synthesis (Ssal_01171-01174 and Ssal_01176-01177), indicating that these two strains are fundamentally different. The complete genome of strain 57.I will allow for comparative genomics to further characterize the polymorphisms of S. salivarius strains and all species within the salivarius group.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The complete genome information of S. salivarius strain 57.I was deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP002888 and CP002889.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CMRPD10011) and the intramural funding of the Research Center for Pathogenic Bacteria of Chang Gung University.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Apweiler R., et al. 2000. InterPro—an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Bioinformatics 16:1145–1150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chen Y. Y., Burne R. A. 2003. Identification and characterization of the nickel uptake system for urease biogenesis in Streptococcus salivarius 57.I. J. Bacteriol. 185:6773–6779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chen Y. Y., Clancy K. A., Burne R. A. 1996. Streptococcus salivarius urease: genetic and biochemical characterization and expression in a dental plaque streptococcus. Infect. Immun. 64:585–592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chen Y. Y., Feng C. W., Chiu C. F., Burne R. A. 2008. cadDX operon of Streptococcus salivarius 57.I. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:1642–1645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chen Y. Y., Weaver C. A., Burne R. A. 2000. Dual functions of Streptococcus salivarius urease. J. Bacteriol. 182:4667–4669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chen Y. Y., Weaver C. A., Mendelsohn D. R., Burne R. A. 1998. Transcriptional regulation of the Streptococcus salivarius 57.I urease operon. J. Bacteriol. 180:5769–5775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Delcher A. L., Bratke K. A., Powers E. C., Salzberg S. L. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ewing B., Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8:186–194 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ewing B., Hillier L., Wendl M. C., Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8:175–185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Facklam R. 2002. What happened to the streptococci: overview of taxonomic and nomenclature changes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:613–630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gordon D. 2003. Viewing and editing assembled sequences using Consed. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics Chapter 11:Unit 11.2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gordon D., Abajian C., Green P. 1998. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 8:195–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Idigoras P., Valiente A., Iglesias L., Trieu-Cout P., Poyart C. 2001. Meningitis due to Streptococcus salivarius. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lagesen K., et al. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of rRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:3100–3108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lowe T. M., Eddy S. R. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of tRNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955–964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ogata H., et al. 1999. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:29–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Shu M., Browngardt C. M., Chen Y. Y., Burne R. A. 2003. Role of urease enzymes in stability of a 10-species oral biofilm consortium cultivated in a constant-depth film fermenter. Infect. Immun. 71:7188–7192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tatusov R. L., Galperin M. Y., Natale D. A., Koonin E. V. 2000. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:33–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES