Skip to main content
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America logoLink to The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
. 2011 Sep;130(3):1748. doi: 10.1121/1.3623751

Erratum: “Overshoot using very short signal delays” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 1915–1921 (2010)]

Dennis McFadden 1,a), Kyle P Walsh 1, Edward G Pasanen 1, Erin Grenwelge 2
PMCID: PMC3188977

All absolute sound-pressure levels mentioned in McFadden et al. (2010) were, in fact, 8.1 dB weaker than stated because of a malfunction in the true rms voltmeter used to adjust the stimulus levels at the earphones. We regret this error. However, we have no reason to question the basic outcomes; the data simply were collected with weaker stimuli than intended. The overall masker levels in Fig. 1 correspond to spectrum levels of about 17 dB and 7 dB, for the 3.0-kHz [Fig. 1 (top)] and 4.0-kHz data [Fig. 1 (bottom)], respectively, both of which are on the low side of optimal for overshoot according to the data of Bacon (1990).

References

  1. Bacon, S. P. (1990). “Effect of masker level on overshoot,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 698–702. 10.1121/1.399773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. McFadden, D., Walsh, K. P., Pasanen, E. G., and Grenwelge, E. M. (2010). “Overshoot using very short signal delays,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 1915–1921. 10.1121/1.3480568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America are provided here courtesy of Acoustical Society of America

RESOURCES