Table 3.
Adjusted Model I | Adjusted Model II | Adjusted Model III | |
---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |
Neighborhood deprivation | |||
Q1: least deprived | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Q2 | 0.90 (0.65, 1.26) | 0.91 (0.65, 1.27) | |
Q3 | 0.71 (0.53, 0.95) | 0.72 (0.53, 0.96) | |
Q4: most deprived | 0.57 (0.43, 0.76) | 0.58 (0.44, 0.77) | |
Residential relocation | |||
No | 1.00 | ||
Yes | 1.55 (1.31, 1.82) | ||
Residential relocation, by type of destination and origin neighborhood | |||
No move, Q1–Q3† | 1.00 | ||
No move, Q4 | 0.76 (0.63, 0.93) | ||
Moved from Q1–Q3 to Q1–Q3 | 1.39 (1.02, 1.89) | ||
Moved from Q4 to Q1–Q3 | 1.96 (1.50, 2.57) | ||
Moved from Q1–Q3 to Q4 | 1.26 (0.89, 1.79) | ||
Moved from Q4 to Q4 | 1.01 (0.77, 1.32) |
All models included a random intercept and adjusted for homelessness at time of cessation, methadone maintenance, detoxification, sex with an IDU partner, incarceration, non-injection drug use, alcohol use, and number of prior moves from time preceding cessation, and all baseline characteristics in Table 1;
Q1–Q4: Quartiles of neighborhood deprivation, where Q4 is the most deprived