Abstract
The 5-year survival rate for oral cavity cancer is poorer than for breast, colon or prostate cancer, and has improved only slightly in the last three decades. Hence, new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. Here we demonstrate by tissue micro array analysis for the first time that RNA-binding protein La is significantly overexpressed in oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Within this study we therefore addressed the question whether siRNA-mediated depletion of the La protein may interfere with known tumor-promoting characteristics of head and neck SCC cells. Our studies demonstrate that the La protein promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion of lymph node-metastasized hypopharyngeal SCC cells. We also reveal that La is required for the expression of β-catenin as well as matrix metalloproteinase type 2 (MMP-2) within these cells. Taken together these data suggest a so far unknown function of the RNA-binding protein La in promoting tumor progression of head and neck SCC.
Introduction
Head and neck (HN) cancer is the sixth most common cancer and affects more than 500,000 individuals globally [1], [2]. This type of cancer typically occurs in the mucosal lining of head or neck regions, e.g. esophagus, sinuses, nasal cavity, pharynx, mouth and lips. The most common type of HN cancer is the oral cavity cancer of which about 90% are squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) [3]. The 5-year survival rate for oral cavity cancer is 60%, which is poorer than that of breast, colon or prostate cancer, and only slightly improved by 5% in the last three decades [4]. Therefore, novel treatment strategies for oral SCC are urgently needed. Oral SCC grows locally in an invasive manner and mainly metastasizes to regional lymph nodes. Typically 50% of oral SCC patients have a detectable lymph node involvement at presentation. Patients with nodal metastasis have a markedly worse prognosis for treatment outcome [5]. The risk of regional metastasis is related to tumor size and depth of infiltration of the primary tumor [5]. The cellular and molecular mechanisms of tumor progression in the oral cavity remain poorly understood.
The La protein (La/SSB) is a ubiquitously and predominantly nuclear expressed RNA-binding protein, which is known to shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm [6], [7], [8], [9]. In mammals La is essential in early development [10]. La is a 408-amino acid protein with three RNA-binding surfaces (the La motif, and two RNA recognition motifs [11]), a nuclear localization sequence, a nuclear retention signal [12], and a nucleolus localization sequence [13]. Little is known about the regulation of La expression [8], [14]. La is posttranslationally modified by phosphorylation [6], [15], [16], [17] and sumoylation [18], both suggested regulating its cellular functions. La is presumed to act as a RNA chaperone to stabilize or refold RNA structures [19], [20]. La is known to promote processing of tRNA precursors and non-coding RNAs [12]. In addition, La supports mRNA translation of various cellular mRNAs, like cyclin D1 [21], XIAP [22] and Mdm2 [23]. Herein we present data demonstrating that the RNA-binding protein La is overexpressed in oral SCC tissue, and supports cell proliferation, migration and invasion of metastasis-derived hypopharyngeal SCC cells in vitro, as well as protein expression of tumor promoting factors β-catenin and MMP-2 but not cyclin D1, focal adhesion kinase (FAK) or cofilin within these cells. Our findings suggest that La may play an important role in tumor progression of head and neck SCC.
Results and Discussion
The RNA-binding protein La is overexpressed in oral SCC tissue
Our previous studies revealed that the La protein is overexpressed in cervical cancer tissue [21]. To answer the question whether La is also aberrantly expressed in other types of cancer, we analyzed an oral cavity tissue microarray (TMA, Imgenex Corp., IMT-01250), consisting of 9 unmatched adjacent normal and 42 tumor tissue cores, diagnosed as SCC tissue ranging from grades I to III. La-specific immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal La antibody 3B9 [24] and counterstaining with Hematoxylin clearly revealed pronounced La-specific nuclear staining of SCC tissue but not normal epithelium (Fig. 1A). As a control, hybridization with immunoglobulin isotype IgG 2a, κ and counterstaining with Hematoxylin was performed, and no nonspecific brown staining was detected (Fig. S1). In addition we verified the specificity of the monoclonal human La 3B9 antibody by hybridization of siRNA-depleted UM-SCC 22B cells demonstrating that La-specific knock down within these cells almost completely abolishes the brown staining (Fig. S2). The TMA was scored by two pathologists independently and revealed that the percentage of La-positive cells was significantly higher in oral SCC tissue compared to normal epithelial tissue (Fig. 1B). In addition, the intensity of nuclear La staining was significantly higher in SCC cells compared to normal cells (Fig. 1C). These data show for the first time that not only more SCC cells express the La protein, but also that the La levels per cell were elevated. These data demonstrate that the RNA-binding protein La is aberrantly overexpressed in oral SCC tissue.
It has been shown that the La protein is overexpressed in a panel of tumor cell lines [25], chronic myelogenous leukaemia patients [23], and recently in cervical cancer tissue [21], suggesting a role of La in cancer pathogenesis. The finding that La stimulates mRNA translation of cyclin D1 in cervical cancer cells [21] and Mdm2 in BCR/ABL-transformed myeloid precursor cells [23], suggests an important role of La in translational control of tumor-promoting factors in cancerous cells. Although little is known about the regulation of La in cancerous cells, the finding that mammalian La is phosphorylated by Casein Kinase 2 [15], [16] and murine La by protein kinase AKT, which induces cytoplasmic accumulation of La and La-dependent translational activation of a specific mRNA subset [6], suggests that not only elevated La expression but also its phosphorylation status and/or intracellular localization is critical during tumorigenesis. However, our data are not allowing us to draw any conclusion about the intracellular localization of La in normal versus tumor cells and more work is needed to test whether the ratio of nuclear:cytoplasmic La is changed during tumor initiation or progression within the oral cavity. In conclusion we demonstrate that the RNA-binding protein La is significantly overexpressed in oral SCC tissue, suggesting that La may play a role in tumorigenesis of cancerous cells originating from various types of tissue [21], [23].
The La protein contributes to proliferation and cell cycle progression of lymph node-metastasized hypopharyngeal SCC cells
To elucidate whether La affects cellular processes known to contribute to tumorigenesis of HNSCC cells, we focused on UM-SCC 22B cells derived from a lymph node metastasis, which primary tumor site was presented as hypopharyngeal SCC [26] (from now on referred to as SCC 22B). To exclude a possible cross-contamination and overgrowth of cell line SCC 22B with HeLa cells, which were earlier cultured in our laboratory, we compared light microscopy images of our cultured SCC 22B cells with images taken from HeLa cells previously purchased from ATCC (Fig. S3). Morphological differences of the scale-like, polygonal SCC 22B cells and the rather elongated-shaped cervical cancer HeLa cells clearly distinguishes the two different cell lines by light microscopy. To test whether La protein regulates proliferation in metastasis-derived SCC cells, we reduced La levels in SCC 22B cells by transfecting La-specific small interfering RNA (La siRNA) [21] or luciferase-specific siRNA [27] as control (Con siRNA). Western blot analysis of cell lysates demonstrated the efficient depletion of La protein in siRNA-treated SCC 22B cells (Fig. 2A). The re-attachment efficiency was monitored after 5 hours by applying the CyQuant proliferation assay and showed that the re-attachment of the cells was unchanged despite La depletion (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the proliferation rate of La-depleted cells was significantly reduced, demonstrating that cells with reduced La expression grow about 40% slower compared to control-treated cells (Fig. 2B). To test whether La depletion induced cell death, the viability of La-depleted cells was analyzed by trypan blue exclusion assays (Fig. 2C), FACS analysis of Annexin V and propidium iodide co-stained cells (Fig. S4) and analysis of caspase-3-dependent PARP cleavage (Fig. 2D). All tests clearly demonstrated that the proliferation rate in La-depleted SCC 22B cells was not reduced by increased cell death, which is in line with studies previously performed in HeLa cells [21]. Next, cell cycle analysis of propidium iodide-stained cells by FACS showed that La depletion induced a G1-arrest in SCC 22B cells concomitant with a decrease of S- and G2-phase cell populations (Fig. 2E), suggesting that the proliferation rate was reduced via a defect in cell cycle progression. Since we have recently shown that overexpression of La stimulates and depletion of La reduces IRES-mediated cyclin D1 mRNA translation in cervical cancer HeLa cells [21], we analyzed whether the expression of the cell cycle regulator cyclin D1 is reduced in La-depleted SCC 22B cells as well. Our data clearly demonstrate that cyclin D1 expression in La-depleted SCC 22B cells is not affected (Fig. 2F). Hence, in contrast to cervical carcinoma cells in which La contributes to cyclin D1 expression and cell proliferation [21], La did not contribute to cyclin D1 expression in SCC 22B cells. Therefore, our data suggest that La regulates cyclin D1 expression in a tissue-specific manner. Taken together these data demonstrate that La expression contributes to cell proliferation and cell cycle progression of metastasis-derived SCC 22B cells.
La supports SCC 22B cell migration in vitro
To address whether La is involved in tumor progression of SCC cells, we analyzed haptokinetic migration (movement of cells across extracellular matrix (ECM)) in vitro, applying two different cell migration assays. First we analyzed the effect of La depletion on migration of cell populations and performed wound-healing (scratch) assays [28], [29]. The ability of SCC 22B cells to migrate into a “wound” caused by a scratch was quantified by measuring the remaining open area of the scratch using NIH image after 24 hours (Fig. 3A). These studies demonstrate that La depletion reduced the repopulation of the wound by about 50% when compared with control-treated SCC 22B cells (Fig. 3B). Next we examined cell motility using the single-cell migration track assay. This assay examines the ability of individual cells to form migration tracks through a field of fluorescent microspheres [30]. We plated gfp-positive La-depleted or control-treated SCC 22B cells on fibronectin-coated plates covered with fluorescent microspheres. The next day, migrating cells were identified as cells that engulfed the fluorescent microspheres and left a track of non-fluorescence (Fig. 3C). Quantification of our data demonstrated that siRNA-mediated depletion of La reduces cell migration by about 65% when compared to control-treated cells (Fig. 3D). The results from both haptokinetic migration assays demonstrate that depletion of the RNA-binding protein La inhibits fundamental processes involved in cell migration of metastasis-derived 22B SCC cells, which is a so far unknown function for La and supports the notion that elevated La levels contribute to cell motility in HNSCC.
To exclude “off-target” effects of the siRNA-mediated La depletion we performed siRNA rescue experiments. Therefore we transfected La-depleted 22B SCC cells with gfp-tagged La, which is resistant to La-specific siRNA due to three silent point mutations in the La siRNA binding site (gfpLaR) [21]. With these cells we determine whether the overexpression of siRNA-resistant La rescues the phenotype of reduced single-cell migration observed in La-depleted 22B SCC cells (Fig. 4A and B). Indeed, the data clearly show that the reduced migration of La-siRNA-treated 22B SCC cells was due to La-specific depletion of La and not due to unspecific off-target effects.
Depletion of La reduces β-catenin protein expression in SCC 22B cells
To get insight into the role and function of La in cell motility we tested the expression of the following factors well known to be implicated in cell motility: focal adhesion kinase (FAK) [31], β-catenin [32] and cofilin [33]. Quantitative Western blot analysis and normalization to GAPDH revealed that the protein expression of β-catenin was significantly but only slightly reduced by 30% in La-depleted SCC 22B cells, whereas FAK and cofilin expression were unchanged (Fig. 5A and B). To demonstrate that the reduced β-catenin expression was not caused by siRNA-dependent off-target effects, we transfected La-depleted SCC 22B cells with the gfpLaR plasmid to overexpress siRNA-resistant gfpLa in cells in which endogenous La level were reduced due to La-specific siRNAs. Two days later we sorted the gfp-positive cells and performed Western blot analysis demonstrating that the expression of siRNA-resistant gfpLa protein (gfpLaR) rescues the β-catenin expression in La-depleted cells (Fig. 5C). This experiment underscores that β-catenin expression depends on cellular La protein level and is not caused by siRNA-dependent off-target effects.
Depending on its localization β-catenin plays a dual role within the cell: (I) in cytoplasmic membranes as part of the adherens junctions it regulates cell-cell adhesion [34], and (II) after Wnt-signaling activation β-catenin shuttles into the nucleus and up-regulates the transcription of tumor promoting target genes [35], [36]. In various types of cancer, including HNSCC, aberrant activation of β-catenin can promote tumor progression by positively effecting cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, adhesion, migration, invasion, and tumor growth in nude mice [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. Reduced membranous staining for β-catenin was observed in less-differentiated oral SCC [43], [44] and increased β-catenin expression in HNSCC patient samples correlated with higher tumor stage [40], [45]. The localization of β-catenin to the cytoplasmic membrane was unchanged in La-depleted SCC cells (Fig. 5D). Therefore the reduced β-catenin protein level in La-depleted metastasis-derived SCC 22B cells suggests, that La supports β-catenin expression in metastatic SCC cells. Since it is known that the RNA-binding protein La stimulates mRNA translation in cancerous cells [21], [22], [23] and because cell migration depends on β-catenin mRNA translation in astrocytes [38], we speculate that elevated La stimulates β-catenin mRNA translation directly or stimulates a positive regulator of β-catenin expression in HNSCC.
La expression promotes SCC 22B cell invasion and MMP-2 protein expression in vitro
We also were interested to test whether La supports the invasive potential of metastasis-derived SCC cells. For those experiments we applied an in vitro invasion assay, in which we compared the ability of control-treated and La-depleted SCC cells to invade and move through Matrigel-coated transwells. As shown (Fig. 6A), the potential of La-depleted SCC cells to invade through the transwells was significantly diminished when compared to the control-treated cells. These results suggest that La affects both cell motility and invasiveness of metastasis-derived 22B SCC cells.
The ability of cells to invade requires the expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which are extracellular endopeptidases known to be key in breaking down barriers formed by the extracellular matrix [46], [47], [48]. MMP overexpression can facilitate tumor cell growth, migration, invasion, and metastasis in many different types of cancer, including oral cancer [49], [50]. In contrast, some MMPs exert dual functions and are able also to inhibit tumor progression depending on tumor stage, tumor site, enzyme localization and substrate, as recently reviewed in Gialeli et al. [51]. Interestingly, quantitative Western blot analysis revealed a strong reduction of MMP-2 protein level in La-depleted cells when compared with control-treated SCC 22B cells (Fig. 6B and C). Elevated MMP-2 expression in oral SCC correlates with aggressive oral tumor behavior and poor prognosis [52], [53], [54], [55] and was suggested as biomarker for early N-stage, aggressive oral SCC [53].
In summary these experiments illuminate a so far unexpected role of the RNA-binding protein La in cell motility and invasion. The finding that La promotes the expression of β-catenin and MMP-2 underscores an important role of La in tumor progression of HNSCC.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines, siRNA transfection and siRNA rescue
HNSCC cell line UM-SCC 22B [26] were kindly provided by Keith Kirkwood (MUSC) and grown in advanced DMEM plus 5% fetal bovine serum. La-specific depletion was performed as described recently [21], and shortly, by transfecting 2x106 SCC 22B cells with 3 µg of La-specific (La siRNA) or control-siRNA (Con siRNA) using a Nucleofector according to the manufacturer's instructions (Nucleofector Kit V, program U-029, AMAXA, Germany). For gfp co-expression 2 µg of gfp expression plasmid (AMAXA) was added to the transfection mix. The siRNA duplexes were designed as 21-mers with 3′-dTdT overhangs [56] and synthesized by Dharmacon RNAi Technologies (USA). La-siRNAs were directed against the La sequence (NM_003142). La-siRNA (+): 5′-GAAACAGACCUGCUAAUACTT-3′ and La-siRNA (-) 3′-TTCUUUGUCUGGACGAUUAUG-5′; control-siRNAs are directed against the Luciferase sequence (referred to as Con [56]: Con-siRNA (+) 5′-CGUACGCGGAAUACUUCGATT-3′ and Con-siRNA (-) 3′-TTGCAUGCGCCUUAUGAAGCU-5′. For the rescue experiments applying PCR-based mutagenesis created the gfpLaR plasmid as described previously [21]. The following oligonucleotides, which introduce three silent point mutations (bold and underlined), were used: 5′-CCAGAAGTACAAAGAAACCGATCTGCTGATACTTTTCAAGG-3′, 5′-CCTTGAAAAGTATCAGCAGATCGGTTTCTTTGTACTTCTGG-3′. For the rescue experiments 2x106 La-depleted SCC 22B cells were transfected with 3 µg of gfpLaR or 2 µg of gfp expression plasmid (AMAXA) using a Nucleofector according to the manufacturer's instructions (Nucleofector Kit V, program U-029, AMAXA, Germany). La-depleted, control-treated and La-rescued SCC 22B cells were analyzed by Western blotting and single-cell migration track assays 24 hours after transfection.
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence
The immunohistochemical staining was performed as described recently [21] by applying the monoclonal human La-specific 3B9 antibody [200 ng/µl] [24] with a dilution of 1:200 on the oral cavity tissue microarray (TMA, Imgenex Corp., IMT-01250). For control staining mouse immunoglobulin isotype IgG2a,κ (eBioscience, [500 ng/µl], dilution 1:200) was applied on successive SCC tissue sections. For immunofluorescence the cells were fixed with 3.7% methanol-free formaldehyde (Thermo Scientific) for 10 min at room temperature. Afterwards cells were washed twice with 1x PBS and permeabilized with 0.3% Triton-X 100 in 1x PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were washed five times with 1x PBS and blocked with horse serum (ImmPress Reagent Kit, Vector) for 30 min at room temperature. The anti-β-catenin antibody (#9581, Cell Signaling Technology, dilution 1:200) was applied over night at 4°C and thereafter washed off five times with 1x PBS. The secondary antibody (anti-rabbit Rhodamine RedX, Invitrogen, dilution 1:500) was applied for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were washed five times with 1x PBS and mounted with Vectashield Mounting Medium for Fluorescence with DAPI (Vector).
Proliferation rate, Annexin V/PI analysis, cell cycle analysis and trypan blue exclusion assay
Proliferation rates were determined as described recently by applying the CyQuant Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Invitrogen) [21]. The number of re-attached cells was determined 5 hours after seeding (FU = fluorescence units). The number of dead cells was determined by Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) co-staining on day 2 after the second siRNA treatment applying the the Annexin-V-FLUOS Staining Kit (Roche). Annexin V staining and propidium iodide incorporation was determined by FACS analysis. For cell cycle analysis, cells were stained with propidium iodide two days after La-specific (La siRNA) and control (Con siRNA) siRNA treatment and cell cycle populations were analyzed by FACS, as described previously [21]. For the trypan blue exclusion assay trypsinized cells were stained with 0.2% trypan blue in 1x PBS followed by counting of unstained cells (viable) and stained cells (nonviable) in a hemocytometer.
Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed and protein was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The following antibodies were applied: monoclonal human La-specific 3B9 antibody [24], anti-PARP (#H-250, Santa Cruz, dilution 1:2,000), anti-Tubulin, (#T5168, Sigma, dilution 1:4,000), anti-GAPDH (#25778 Santa Cruz, dilution 1:2,000), anti-MMP-2 (#4022, Cell Signaling Technology, dilution 1:1,000), anti-cofilin (#C8736, Sigma, 1:1000), anti-β-catenin (#9581, Cell Signaling Technology, dilution 1:1,000), anti-FAK (#610087, Cell Signaling Technology, dilution 1:1,000). Secondary antibodies (dilution 1:20,000) were horseradish peroxidase-conjugated (Dianova, Germany).
Wound healing assay
Wound healing assay was performed similar as described previously [29]. Briefly, La-depleted and control-treated UM-SCC 22B cells were allowed to grow to 90% confluence in a 12-well plate (Costar). The medium was replaced with serum-free medium and left overnight before scratching a wound using a 200 µl pipette tip. Phase contrast pictures of the scratched area were taken at time 0 and after 24 hours exactly at the same position at a marked area on the cell culture plate using a Zeiss Axio Observer microscope. The scratched area was quantified at each time point using NIH image software.
Migration track assay
Wells were pre-coated with 5 µg/ml fibronectin (Fisher) in 1x PBS for 4 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C and then overlaid with a field of 1 µm in diameter carboxylate-modified polystyrene fluorescent microspheres (Invitrogen) in 1x PBS and left to settle for at least 2 hours at 4°C. Thereafter, gfp-transfected La-depleted and control-treated SCC 22B cells were seeded at low density (4 cells per mm2) in normal growth medium and incubated for a period of 24 hours. Non-fluorescent tracks created by gfp-transfected cells were then evaluated by fluorescent microscopy using a Zeiss Axio Observer microscope and quantified by counting the number of non-fluorescent tracks of gfp-transfected cells ( = migrating cells) on each plate.
Invasion assay
In vitro invasion assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber) or by coating 24-well Transwell plates (Corning) with 1mg/ml Matrigel (BD #354230) in 1x PBS. La-depleted or control-treated SCC 22B cells were plated in triplicates on Matrigel-coated Transwell inserts at 1×105 in serum-free DMEM. The lower chamber contained DMEM with 5% FBS as a chemoattractant. After 24 hours of incubation, non-migrating cells were removed from the upper chamber with a cotton swab. According to the manufacturer's instructions (Cell Biolabs, colorimetric invasion assay, #CBA-100-C) cells that had invaded through the Matrigel-coated membrane to the lower surface were fixed, stained, extracted and quantified by optical density measurement at 560 nm applying a multiplate reader. Alternatively, cells on the lower surface of the membrane were fixed and stained according to manufacturer's instructions with the Diff-Quick Stain Kit (IMEBINC, #K7128) followed by mounting and counting cells within 10 random microscopic fields.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Robert Zinna (Center of Oral Health Research (COHR, MUSC) and Rick Peppler (Flow Cytometry Shared Resource as part of the Hollings Cancer Center at MUSC) for FACS analysis. We are grateful to Michael Bachmann (Technical University Dresden, Germany) for providing La 3B9 antibodies, Keith Kirkwood (MUSC) for providing the UM-SCC 22B cell line, and Dennis Watson (MUSC) and David Turner (MUSC) for experimental advice.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work was supported by the Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology (MUSC), by SC COBRE for Oral Health Research P20RR017696-09 and NIH/NCRR 1R03DE021729-01. FACS analysis was performed at the Flow Cytometry Shared Resource as part of the Hollings Cancer Center at MUSC, which is funded by a Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA138313. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer. 2001;94:153–156. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Beenken SW, Urist MM. Current surgical diagnosis and treatment. In: Way LW, Doherty GM, editors. New York, McGraw-Hill: 2003. pp. 282–297. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sano D, Myers JN. Metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26:645–662. doi: 10.1007/s10555-007-9082-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brenet F, Socci ND, Sonenberg N, Holland EC. Akt phosphorylation of La regulates specific mRNA translation in glial progenitors. Oncogene. 2009;28:128–139. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fok V, Friend K, Steitz JA. Epstein-Barr virus noncoding RNAs are confined to the nucleus, whereas their partner, the human La protein, undergoes nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:319–325. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200601026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Troster H, Metzger TE, Semsei I, Schwemmle M, Winterpacht A, et al. One gene, two transcripts: isolation of an alternative transcript encoding for the autoantigen La/SS-B from a cDNA library of a patient with primary Sjogrens' syndrome. J Exp Med. 1994;180:2059–2067. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.6.2059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chambers JC, Kenan D, Martin BJ, Keene JD. Genomic structure and amino acid sequence domains of the human La autoantigen. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:18043–18051. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Park JM, Kohn MJ, Bruinsma MW, Vech C, Intine RV, et al. The multifunctional RNA-binding protein La is required for mouse development and for the establishment of embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:1445–1451. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.4.1445-1451.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kenan DJ, Keene JD. La gets its wings. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11:303–305. doi: 10.1038/nsmb0404-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wolin SL, Cedervall T. The La protein. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:375–403. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.090501.150003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Horke S, Reumann K, Schweizer M, Will H, Heise T. Nuclear trafficking of La protein depends on a newly identified nucleolar localization signal and the ability to bind RNA. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:26563–26570. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401017200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Carter MS, Sarnow P. Distinct mRNAs that encode La autoantigen are differentially expressed and contain internal ribosome entry sites. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:28301–28307. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004657200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schwartz EI, Intine RV, Maraia RJ. CK2 is responsible for phosphorylation of human La protein serine-366 and can modulate rpL37 5′-terminal oligopyrimidine mRNA metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:9580–9591. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.21.9580-9591.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Intine RV, Sakulich AL, Koduru SB, Huang Y, Pierstorff E, et al. Control of transfer RNA maturation by phosphorylation of the human La antigen on serine 366. Mol Cell. 2000;6:339–348. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00034-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Broekhuis CH, Neubauer G, van der Heijden A, Mann M, Proud CG, et al. Detailed analysis of the phosphorylation of the human La (SS-B) autoantigen. (De)phosphorylation does not affect its subcellular distribution. Biochemistry. 2000;39:3023–3033. doi: 10.1021/bi992308c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van Niekerk EA, Willis DE, Chang JH, Reumann K, Heise T, et al. Sumoylation in axons triggers retrograde transport of the RNA-binding protein La. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:12913–12918. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611562104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Belisova A, Semrad K, Mayer O, Kocian G, Waigmann E, et al. RNA chaperone activity of protein components of human Ro RNPs. RNA. 2005;11:1084–1094. doi: 10.1261/rna.7263905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pannone BK, Xue D, Wolin SL. A role for the yeast La protein in U6 snRNP assembly: evidence that the La protein is a molecular chaperone for RNA polymerase III transcripts. EMBO J. 1998;17:7442–7453. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.24.7442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sommer G, Dittmann J, Kuehnert J, Reumann K, Schwartz PE, et al. The RNA-binding protein La contributes to cell proliferation and CCND1 expression. Oncogene. 2011;30:434–444. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Holcik M, Korneluk RG. Functional characterization of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) internal ribosome entry site element: role of La autoantigen in XIAP translation. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:4648–4657. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.13.4648-4657.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Trotta R, Vignudelli T, Candini O, Intine RV, Pecorari L, et al. BCR/ABL activates mdm2 mRNA translation via the La antigen. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:145–160. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kremerskothen J, Nettermann M, op de Bekke A, Bachmann M, Brosius J. Identification of human autoantigen La/SS-B as BC1/BC200 RNA-binding protein. DNA Cell Biol. 1998;17:751–759. doi: 10.1089/dna.1998.17.751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Al-Ejeh F, Darby JM, Brown MP. The La autoantigen is a malignancy-associated cell death target that is induced by DNA-damaging drugs. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:5509s–5518s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Carey TE, Kimmel KA, Schwartz DR, Richter DE, Baker SR, et al. Antibodies to human squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1983;91:482–491. doi: 10.1177/019459988309100503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Weber K, Tuschl T. Analysis of gene function in somatic mammalian cells using small interfering RNAs. Methods. 2002;26:199–213. doi: 10.1016/S1046-2023(02)00023-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rodriguez LG, Wu X, Guan JL. Wound-healing assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;294:23–29. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-860-9:023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liang CC, Park AY, Guan JL. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:329–333. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Windler-Hart SL, Chen KY, Chenn A. A cell behavior screen: identification, sorting, and enrichment of cells based on motility. BMC Cell Biol. 2005;6:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-6-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao J, Guan JL. Signal transduction by focal adhesion kinase in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009;28:35–49. doi: 10.1007/s10555-008-9165-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lai SL, Chien AJ, Moon RT. Wnt/Fz signaling and the cytoskeleton: potential roles in tumorigenesis. Cell Res. 2009;19:532–545. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bernstein BW, Bamburg JR. ADF/cofilin: a functional node in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Harris TJ, Tepass U. Adherens junctions: from molecules to morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:502–514. doi: 10.1038/nrm2927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Heuberger J, Birchmeier W. Interplay of cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and canonical Wnt signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a002915. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Takemaru KI, Ohmitsu M, Li FQ. Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2008. An oncogenic hub: beta-catenin as a molecular target for cancer therapeutics. pp. 261–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yang F, Zeng Q, Yu G, Li S, Wang CY. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling inhibits death receptor-mediated apoptosis and promotes invasive growth of HNSCC. Cell Signal. 2006;18:679–687. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jones KJ, Korb E, Kundel MA, Kochanek AR, Kabraji S, et al. CPEB1 regulates beta-catenin mRNA translation and cell migration in astrocytes. Glia. 2008;56:1401–1413. doi: 10.1002/glia.20707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Iwai S, Yonekawa A, Harada C, Hamada M, Katagiri W, et al. Involvement of the Wnt-beta-catenin pathway in invasion and migration of oral squamous carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2010;37:1095–1103. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Goto M, Mitra RS, Liu M, Lee J, Henson BS, et al. Rap1 stabilizes beta-catenin and enhances beta-catenin-dependent transcription and invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:65–76. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Inge LJ, Rajasekaran SA, Wolle D, Barwe SP, Ryazantsev S, et al. alpha-Catenin overrides Src-dependent activation of beta-catenin oncogenic signaling. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:1386–1397. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Molinolo AA, Amornphimoltham P, Squarize CH, Castilho RM, Patel V, et al. Dysregulated molecular networks in head and neck carcinogenesis. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:324–334. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lo Muzio L. A possible role for the WNT-1 pathway in oral carcinogenesis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2001;12:152–165. doi: 10.1177/10454411010120020501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ueda G, Sunakawa H, Nakamori K, Shinya T, Tsuhako W, et al. Aberrant expression of beta- and gamma-catenin is an independent prognostic marker in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:356–361. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yu Z, Weinberger PM, Provost E, Haffty BG, Sasaki C, et al. beta-Catenin functions mainly as an adhesion molecule in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:2471–2477. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen P, Parks WC. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in epithelial migration. J Cell Biochem. 2009;108:1233–1243. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Deryugina EI, Quigley JP. Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25:9–34. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-7886-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Deryugina EI, Quigley JP. Biochim Biophys Acta. Vol. 1803. 103-120; 2010. Pleiotropic roles of matrix metalloproteinases in tumor angiogenesis: contrasting, overlapping and compensatory functions. pp. 103–120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kessenbrock K, Plaks V, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell. 2010;141:52–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rosenthal EL, Matrisian LM. Matrix metalloproteases in head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2006;28:639–648. doi: 10.1002/hed.20365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gialeli C, Theocharis AD, Karamanos NK. Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression and their pharmacological targeting. FEBS J. 2011;278:16–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07919.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gao ZB, Duan YQ, Zhang L, Chen DW, Ding PT. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and its tissue inhibitor in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Med. 2005;16:599–603. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mitra RS, Goto M, Lee JS, Maldonado D, Taylor JM, et al. Rap1GAP promotes invasion via induction of matrix metalloproteinase 9 secretion, which is associated with poor survival in low N-stage squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3959–3969. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Patel BP, Shah SV, Shukla SN, Shah PM, Patel PS. Clinical significance of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in patients with oral cancer. Head Neck. 2007;29:564–572. doi: 10.1002/hed.20561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ruokolainen H, Paakko P, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T. Tissue and circulating immunoreactive protein for MMP-2 and TIMP-2 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma–tissue immunoreactivity predicts aggressive clinical course. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:208–217. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, et al. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature. 2001;411:494–498. doi: 10.1038/35078107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.