Background: The T7 DNA helicase couples the hydrolysis of dTTP to translocation on ssDNA and the unwinding of dsDNA.
Results: Phe523, positioned in a β-hairpin loop at the subunit interface, plays a role in coupling the hydrolysis of dTTP to DNA unwinding.
Conclusion: Phe523 contacts the displaced complementary strand and facilitates unwinding.
Significance: The mechanism of DNA unwinding by T7 DNA helicase.
Keywords: ATPases, DNA Enzymes, DNA Helicase, DNA Replication, Enzyme Kinetics
Abstract
The DNA helicase encoded by gene 4 of bacteriophage T7 assembles on single-stranded DNA as a hexamer of six identical subunits with the DNA passing through the center of the toroid. The helicase couples the hydrolysis of dTTP to unidirectional translocation on single-stranded DNA and the unwinding of duplex DNA. Phe523, positioned in a β-hairpin loop at the subunit interface, plays a key role in coupling the hydrolysis of dTTP to DNA unwinding. Replacement of Phe523 with alanine or valine abolishes the ability of the helicase to unwind DNA or allow T7 polymerase to mediate strand-displacement synthesis on duplex DNA. In vivo complementation studies reveal a requirement for a hydrophobic residue with long side chains at this position. In a crystal structure of T7 helicase, when a nucleotide is bound at a subunit interface, Phe523 is buried within the interface. However, in the unbound state, it is more exposed on the outer surface of the helicase. This structural difference suggests that the β-hairpin bearing the Phe523 may undergo a conformational change during nucleotide hydrolysis. We postulate that upon hydrolysis of dTTP, Phe523 moves from within the subunit interface to a more exposed position where it contacts the displaced complementary strand and facilitates unwinding.
Introduction
DNA replication requires the transient unwinding of duplex DNA to enable the DNA polymerase to have access to a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)3 template for base pairing during DNA synthesis. A class of enzymes termed DNA helicases mediate this unwinding of DNA by coupling the energy of hydrolysis of a nucleoside triphosphate to conformational changes in the protein for unidirectional movement along DNA. The replisome of bacteriophage T7 can be reconstituted in vitro by gene 5 protein (DNA polymerase), Escherichia coli thioredoxin (processivity factor), gene 2.5 protein (ssDNA-binding protein), and gene 4 protein (DNA helicase and DNA primase) (1, 2). The primase and helicase activities of gene 4 protein (gp4) reside in the N-terminal and C-terminal parts of the polypeptide, respectively (3). T7 DNA primase derives several benefits from its physical association with the helicase, an association that, in other replication systems, requires an association of the separately encoded proteins (2–4). The helicase domain of gp4 places it within the SF4 family of helicases (5). Like other members of this family, gp4 assembles onto ssDNA as a hexamer, an oligomerization that is facilitated by the binding of dTTP (6, 7). On ssDNA, the protein then translocates unidirectionally 5′ to 3′ by using the energy of hydrolysis of dTTP (8). Upon encountering duplex DNA, gp4 will unwind the DNA.
The crystal structure of the hexameric gp4 reveals a 6-fold symmetric ring with a central core of 25–30 Å (Fig. 1A) (9). Electron microscopy and biochemical studies provide strong evidence that ssDNA threads through the central core of the helicase, and it has been proposed that ssDNA transfers from one subunit to the adjacent subunit sequentially as dTTP is hydrolyzed in the intersubunit interfaces (6, 9, 10). Recent studies have also provided information on the mechanism by which the energy of hydrolysis of a nucleoside triphosphate is coupled to the unidirectional translocation of the gene 4 helicase and unwinding of duplex DNA (10–14). Unlike other DNA helicases of this family, T7 DNA helicase preferentially uses dTTP for translocation and DNA unwinding (15, 16).
For T7 DNA helicase to initiate unwinding of a duplex DNA molecule it requires a preformed fork bearing a 5′-single-stranded tail of greater than 17 nucleotides and a 3′-tail of at least 7 nucleotides (16, 17). gp4 assembles on the 5′-ssDNA tail and the 3′-tail prevents duplex DNA from entering the central core (18). A report on E. coli DnaB helicase provides evidence that the 3′ arm plays a role analogous to a mechanical fulcrum for the hexameric helicase bound to the 5′ arm, necessary to provide mechanical support for the advancing helicase on the opposite strand of the DNA (19). However, the interaction site of the helicase, if any, during unwinding of DNA with the excluded strand is not known. The crystal structures of T7 DNA helicase are in the absence of DNA so it is not known if the assembly of gp4 on duplex DNA differs from that on ssDNA. Mechanistically, the interaction of the helicase with the two strands of duplex DNA during unwinding is important for differentiating whether the helicase destabilizes duplex DNA (active helicase) or opportunistically translocates onto thermally open DNA (passive helicase). In earlier studies, a random mutagenesis of gene 4 revealed residues (Ser345 and Gly451 in the helicase domain) to be important for DNA unwinding (20). Arg522 (the arginine finger) and Lys467 (central β-hairpin) mutations also lead to a loss of DNA unwinding (21, 22). It is interesting to note that each of these amino acid residues resides at the subunit interface of the hexameric gp4 and all of the mutants retain the ability to hydrolyze dTTP (supplemental Fig. S1).
From examination of the crystal structure of gp4, we have identified a β-hairpin located at the subunit interface that includes residues 522 through 530 (Fig. 1). The β-hairpin starts with the arginine finger (Arg522) followed by Phe523 and eight other residues (Thr524-Gly-Asp-Thr-Gly-Ile-Ala530). This β-hairpin adopts different orientations depending upon the availability of nucleotide in the nucleotide-binding site at the subunit interface. In the presence of a nucleotide, Phe523 is buried within the subunit interface, and Arg522 contacts the γ-phosphate of the nucleotide (Fig. 1B). However, in the absence of a nucleotide, the β-hairpin undergoes a conformational change such that Arg522 makes a hydrogen bridge with Glu348 from the adjacent subunit and Phe523 is more exposed toward the exterior surface of gp4 (Fig. 1C). In the present study, we substituted Phe523 with a variety of amino acids and examined the ability of these altered helicases to support T7 growth. We also determined the biochemical properties of these helicases in isolation or in association with T7 DNA polymerase. Our results show that Phe523 plays a crucial role in coupling NTP hydrolysis with DNA unwinding by stabilizing the excluded strand by hydrophobic interactions.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
E. coli C600, E. coli HMS174 (DE3), and pET11b were from Novagen. Wild-type and gene 4-deficient T7 phage (T7Δ4) were from the laboratory collection. Oligonucleotides were from Integrated DNA Technologies. M13 ssDNA and T4 polynucleotide kinase were from New England Biolabs. The site-directed mutagenesis kit was from Stratagene. All chemicals and reagents were from Sigma unless otherwise specified.
Methods
Phage Complementation Assays
E. coli C600 cells transformed with a plasmid that expresses gene 4 under a T7 promoter were grown to an A600 of 1. Serially diluted T7 phage stocks were mixed with an aliquot of the E. coli culture in 0.7% soft agar and poured onto LB plates with appropriate antibiotics. After incubation for 4–6 h at 37 °C, the number of plaques that appeared was counted. The number of plaques formed by plasmids harboring wild-type gp4 was normalized to 1. The relative efficiency of plating obtained with the altered gene 4 constructs was determined by the number of plaques formed by the mutated gene 4 constructs divided by the number of plaques formed of wild-type gene 4.
Mutagenesis, Overexpression, and Purification of Gene 4 Proteins
Plasmid pET11gp4-63 was used for expression and overproduction of wild-type gp4 (23). The plasmid was also used to create point mutations by using the QuikChange II Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The sequences of primers used to construct various single mutations are available on request. Mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Constructs harboring wild-type or mutated gene 4 were transferred to E. coli strain HMS174 (DE3) for overproduction of the corresponding proteins. Wild-type and altered gene 4 proteins were purified as described earlier (10). The purified proteins are >95% pure as judged by Coomassie staining of the proteins on a polyacrylamide gel (supplemental Fig. S2).
dTTP Hydrolysis Assays
dTTP hydrolysis assays were carried out at 37 °C in a reaction mixture containing 40 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mm MgCl2, 10 mm DTT, 50 mm potassium glutamate, 100 nm gp4, 5 nm M13 ssDNA, and the indicated concentration of [α-32P]dTTP (22). After incubation for 30 min at 37 °C, EDTA was added to a final concentration of 25 mm to stop the reaction and then the reaction sample was kept on ice. The product of hydrolysis of [α-32P]dNDP was separated from [α-32P]dNTP on polyethyleneimine-coated TLC plates using 0.5 m formic acid and 0.5 m lithium chloride. The TLC plates were scanned in a phosphorimager (Fuji) and the intensity of the spots was measured using ImageQuant software (Fuji). The data were further analyzed using GraphPad Prism software.
DNA Binding Assays
A nitrocellulose filter-binding assay was used for measuring the ability of gp4 to bind to ssDNA or duplex DNA. Reaction mixtures (20 μl) containing either 1 nm 5′-32P-labeled 95-mer oligonucleotide (5′-T39 GGC ATG TCA CGA CGT TGT AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT GAA TTC GAG CTC GGT ACC CGG CG-3′) or 1 nm 5′-32P-labeled 95-mer oligonucleotide partially annealed to a 75-mer oligonucleotide (5′-CGC CGG GTA CCG AGC TCG AAT TCA CTG GCC GTC GTT TTA CAA CGT CGT GAC ATG CCT19-3′). These DNAs were incubated with different concentrations (25–250 nm) of gp4 in 40 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mm MgCl2, 10 mm DTT, 50 mm potassium glutamate, and 1 mm β,γ-methylene dTTP at 37 °C for 30 min. The reaction mixtures were filtered through two layers of membranes, a nitrocellulose membrane (0.45 μm) laid above a Zeta Probe (Bio-Rad) membrane. After washing with the buffer three times, protein-DNA complex bound to the nitrocellulose membrane and free DNA bound to the Zeta Probe membrane were measured with a Fuji/BAS 1000 Bioimaging analyzer.
DNA Unwinding Assays
The substrate for DNA unwinding assays was prepared by annealing a 5′-32P-end-labeled 75-mer oligo (5′-CGC CGG GTA CCG AGC TCG AAT TCA CTG GCC GTC GTT TTA CAA CGT CGT GAC ATG CCT19-3′) with an unlabeled 95-mer oligo (5′-T39 GGC ATG TCA CGA CGT TGT AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT GAA TTC GAG CTC GGT ACC CGG CG-3′). Reaction mixtures (20 μl) containing 100 nm labeled DNA substrate, 50 nm gp4, 40 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mm MgCl2, 10 mm DTT, 50 mm potassium glutamate, and 1 mm dTTP were incubated at 37 °C for up to 10 min. The reactions were stopped by the addition of 0.4% (w/v) SDS, 40 mm EDTA, 8% (v/v) glycerol, and 0.1% (w/v) bromphenol blue to the final concentrations. Single-stranded oligonucleotides were separated from the duplex substrate in a 10% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel. Image intensities were quantified using Image Gauge and GraphPad Prism software.
Protein Oligomerization Assay
gp4s were examined for their ability to oligomerize in the presence of a nonhydrolyzable dTTP analog (β,γ-methylene dTTP). The reaction mixtures (15 μl) containing 2 μm (monomer) gp4, 40 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mm MgCl2, 10 mm DTT, 50 mm potassium glutamate, 0.01 to 1 mm β,γ-methylene dTTP and 1 μm 50-mer ssDNA were incubated for 20 min at 37 οC. The reactions were stopped by the addition of glutaraldehyde to 0.033% (v/v). The reaction sample was kept at 37 οC for another 5 min, and the reaction products were analyzed on a nondenaturing 10% polyacrylamide gel using a running buffer of 0.25× TBE. After staining with Coomassie Blue, the oligomerization status of gp4 was determined by gel analysis as described (24). The mobility of hexamers and heptamers were distinguished as described earlier (25). The density of protein bands corresponding to monomers and higher order oligomers in each lane were measured by AlphaEase FC software (AlphaImager 3400). The fraction of hexamers formed from monomers was determined by the density of hexamers and higher order oligomers divided by the total density of protein bands in the corresponding lane as described earlier (26, 27). The fraction of hexamers formed was plotted against the concentration of β,γ-methylene dTTP and obtained the apparent dissociation constant (KD) for hexamer formation (26, 27).
Strand-displacement DNA Synthesis Assays
M13 circular dsDNA having a 5′-tail was used to monitor strand-displacement DNA synthesis. A replication fork was constructed by annealing M13 ssDNA to an oligonucleotide (5′-T36AAT TCG TAA TCA TGG TCA TAG CTG TTT CCT-3′) having 30 bases complementary to the M13 ssDNA and 36 bases forming a 5′-tail. Then gp5/trx was used to convert the ssDNA circle to dsDNA circle. Phenol/chloroform was used to remove gp5/trx. Strand-displacement synthesis assay was carried out at 37 °C in a 30-μl reaction mixture containing 40 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mm MgCl2, 10 mm DTT, 50 mm potassium glutamate, 10 nm gp5/trx, 20 nm wild-type or altered gp4 (hexamer), 500 μm each of dATP, [α-32P]dTTP (10 Ci/mmol), dCTP, and dGTP, and 10 nm M13 double-stranded DNA. After incubation of the reactions up to 30 min, the reaction was stopped with EDTA at a final concentration of 25 mm and then the mixture was spotted onto DE81 filter paper. After washing 3 times with 0.3 m ammonium formate and 100% ethanol, incorporated [32P]dTMP was measured in a liquid scintillating counter (28).
Single-molecule Analysis
Phage λ DNA molecules containing a replication fork were attached with the end of one strand to the glass surface of a flow cell via the biotin-SA link and with the other end to a 2.8-μm paramagnetic bead (Dynal) via digoxigenin-antidigoxigenin as described previously (29, 30). To prevent nonspecific interactions between the beads and the surface, a 1 piconewton magnetic force was applied upward by positioning a permanent magnet above the flow cell. Beads were imaged with a CCD camera with a time resolution of 500 ms, and the centers of their positions for every acquisition time point were determined by particle-tracking software. Bead-bound and surface-tethered DNA were preincubated with 100 nm T7 gp5/trx and 50 nm T7 gp4 (wild-type gp4, gp4-F523H, or gp4-F523V) in replication buffer (40 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 50 mm potassium glutamate, 2 mm EDTA, 0.1 mg/ml of BSA) with 600 μm each dNTP and 10 mm DTT for 15 min. Next, the flow cell was washed with replication buffer with dNTPs and DTT. Finally, DNA synthesis was initiated by introducing replication buffer with dNTPs, DTT, and 10 mm MgCl2. After particle tracking, traces were corrected for residual instabilities in the flow by subtracting traces corresponding to tethers that were not enzymatically altered. Bead displacements were converted into numbers of nucleotides synthesized using the known length difference between ssDNA and dsDNA at our experimental conditions (29).
Physical Interaction of Proteins
Protein interactions were measured using surface plasmon resonance. Surface plasmon resonance was performed using a Biacore 3000 instrument. Wild-type or altered gp4 were immobilized (3000 response units) on a CM-5 (carboxymethyl-5) chip using EDC/NHS chemistry. Immobilization was performed in 10 mm sodium acetate (pH 5.0) at a flow rate of 10 μl/min. Binding studies were performed in 20 mm HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mm MgCl2, 250 mm potassium glutamate, 5 mm DTT, at a flow rate of 40 μl/min (30). The chip surface was regenerated using 1 m NaCl at a flow rate of 100 μl/min. As a control, a flow cell was activated and blocked in the absence of protein to account for changes in the bulk refractive index. gp5/trx (0.1 to 3 μm) was flowed over the bound gp4 as shown in the Fig. 7A. Apparent binding constants were calculated under steady-state conditions and the data were fitted using BIAEVAL 3.0.2 software (Biacore).
To examine the binding of gp5/trx to gp4 in the presence of primer-template, biotinylated DNA was coupled to a streptavidin-coated chip as previously described (see Fig. 7B). A template strand was used with a biotin group attached to 3′-end, and an annealed primer (30). The template DNA was coupled at a concentration of 0.25 μm in HBS-EP buffer (10 mm HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mm NaCl, and 0.005% (v/v) Tween 20) at a flow rate of 10 μl/min. Binding studies of gp5/trx were performed in 20 mm HEPES (pH 7.4), 5 mm MgCl2, 2.5 mm DTT, 200 mm potassium glutamate, and 1% (w/v) glycerol at a flow rate of 10 μl/min. gp5/trx was injected at a concentration of 0.2 μm in a flow buffer containing 1 mm dGTP and 10 μm ddATP: a saturating 1:1 binding condition between gp5/trx and primer-template. gp4 was injected over the chip in the above buffer containing 0.1 mm ATP and 2 mm dGTP. A flow cell blocked with biotin was used as a control to measure nonspecific interaction and bulk refractive index of the sample buffer containing gp4. The chip surface was stripped of bound proteins by sequential injections of 150 μl of 1 m NaCl at a flow rate of 100 μl/min.
RESULTS
Phe523 Is Required for T7 Phage Growth
The effect of the genetically altered gene 4 proteins on the growth of T7 phage was examined (Table 1). T7Δ4 phage, lacking gene 4, are dependent on the expression of plasmid-encoded gene 4 protein for viability (31). To ascertain the role of Phe523, gene 4 mutants were constructed in which Phe523 was replaced with alanine (gp4–523A), valine (gp4–523V), isoleucine (gp4–523I), leucine (gp4–523L), histidine (gp4–523H), or tyrosine (gp4–523Y). Plasmids encoding gp4-F523I, gp4-F523L, gp4-F523H, and gp4-F523Y complemented the growth of T7Δ4 with similar levels of efficiency of plating as wild-type gp4 (Table 1). In contrast, gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V did not support the growth of T7Δ4 phage. Wild-type T7 phage grow normally in the presence of these altered helicases.
TABLE 1.
pET11b:gp4 construct | Efficiency of plating T7Δ4 |
---|---|
Wild-type | 1 |
F523A | ≤10−9 |
F523V | ≤10−9 |
F523I | 0.9 |
F523L | 0.8 |
F523H | 0.9 |
F523Y | 0.8 |
Role of Phe523 in ssDNA-dependent dTTP Hydrolysis
The proteins coded by Phe523-altered constructs were overproduced, purified, and characterized biochemically. To determine whether Phe523 plays a role in DNA-dependent hydrolysis of dTTP, we measured dTTP hydrolysis activity of the gene 4 proteins in the presence of M13 ssDNA (Fig. 2). All of the altered proteins had DNA-dependent dTTP hydrolysis activity albeit with reduced efficiency. The kinetic parameters of these assays are presented in Table 2. gp4-F523A, gp4-F523V, and gp4-F523H exhibited about 20–30% of dTTP hydrolysis activity. However, only gp4-F523H complemented the growth of T7Δ4 phage. gp4-F523I, gp4-F523L, and gp4-F523Y exhibited 60–70% of dTTP hydrolysis activity as compared with that of wild-type gp4 and all of them complemented gene 4 function in vivo. Despite the differences in the maximal rate of dTTP hydrolysis activity among the Phe523-altered helicases, the calculated kcat/Km values for each of these proteins are comparable with the wild-type gp4 (7.6 s−1 mm−1). In the absence of ssDNA gp4 hydrolyzes dTTP at a significantly slower rate (10) and this observation also is true for the altered proteins (Table 2). All of the proteins have significant activity in the absence of ssDNA although there is a considerable variation in the ability of the altered gp4 to hydrolyze dTTP. Altogether, results show that Phe523-altered proteins retained dTTP hydrolysis activity.
TABLE 2.
gp4-helicase | No M13 ssDNA |
5 nm M13 ssDNA |
KDNA | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
kcat | Km | kcat/Km | Relative kcat | kcat | Km | kcat/Km | Relative kcat | ||
s−1 | mm | s−1 mm−1 | s−1 | mm | s−1mm−1 | nm | |||
Wild-type | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 3.4 | 100 | 17.6 ± 1 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 7.6 | 100 | 0.14 |
F523A | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.35 | 29 | 3.9 ± 0.7 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 7.8 | 22 | 0.54 |
F523V | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 0.6 | 50 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 7.4 | 21 | 0.91 |
F523I | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.5 | 62 | 12.4 ± 1.2 | 1.6 ± 0.4 | 7.7 | 70 | 0.29 |
F523L | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 1.75 | 145 | 10.8 ± 0.9 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 8.3 | 61 | 0.38 |
F523H | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 1.2 | 50 | 5.4 ± 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 10.8 | 31 | 0.13 |
F523Y | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 0.2 ± 0.04 | 3.15 | 262 | 9.9 ± 0.8 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 9 | 56 | 0.37 |
Furthermore, we have measured the effect of ssDNA concentration on DNA-dependent dTTP hydrolysis (Fig. 2B and Table 2). All of the altered gp4 (except gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V) bind M13 ssDNA with a KD of 0.1–0.3 nm, a value comparable with that observed with wild-type gp4 (KD = 0.1 nm). gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V bind M13 ssDNA relatively less tightly than does wild-type gp4 with a KD of 0.5 and 0.9 nm, respectively. This weaker binding affinity could account for the lower rate of dTTP hydrolysis activity by gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V. However, the lower rate of dTTP hydrolysis catalyzed by gp4-F523H cannot be explained in this experiment.
Role of Phe523 in DNA Unwinding
Upon binding of dTTP, Phe523 in the β-hairpin is located in the NTP-binding site. In the empty state Phe523 is oriented toward the outer surface of the helicase (Fig. 1). This reorientation suggests a role for Phe523 in helicase activity. Initially, the altered proteins were compared with wild-type gp4 for their ability to unwind dsDNA with a replication fork at one end. Wild-type gp4 will initiate unwinding on a duplex DNA molecule provided a preformed replication fork is present at one end of the DNA. The preformed fork consists of a 5′-single-stranded tail of 39 nucleotides and a 3′-single-stranded tail of 19 nucleotides (Fig. 3A). On this DNA gp4 can assemble on the 5′-tail and initiate unwinding, whereas it cannot on a DNA molecule having only a 3′- or 5′-tail or a blunt end (Fig. 3A). In this assay one strand of the duplex is labeled at its 5′ terminus with 32P, which is released as ssDNA in unwinding by the helicase. Duplex and ssDNA can be identified by electrophoresis through nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels (Fig. 3B). Using the DNA molecule with the preformed replication fork we find that gp4-F523A, and gp4-F523V, does not catalyze unwinding of the DNA. Interestingly, despite the reduced levels (∼30%) of dTTP hydrolysis, gp4-F523H exhibited the highest level of unwinding activity (∼70%) among all the Phe523 altered proteins. gp4-F523I, gp4-F523L, and gp4-F523Y can unwind the DNA but not as efficiently as wild-type gp4. Although gp4-F523I retains 30% of the activity of wild-type gp4, gp4-F523L and gp4-F523Y retain up to 50%, as calculated from the exponential phase of the reactions. These results demonstrate that small residues like alanine and valine cannot substitute for phenylalanine. However, hydrophobic residues with longer side chains like leucine and isoleucine can partially substitute, and amino acids with aromatic side chains such as tyrosine and histidine approach the efficiency of phenylalanine for unwinding activity. gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V did not exhibit DNA unwinding activity even at higher protein concentrations (2 μm) (supplemental Fig. S3). It is clear from these results that Phe523 is important in DNA unwinding by T7 DNA helicase.
Binding of Gp4 to ssDNA and at a Fork on Duplex DNA
gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V are completely defective and gp4-F523I is partially defective in unwinding duplex DNA although the later protein retains a considerable level of dTTP hydrolysis activity. One explanation for the defect in unwinding of duplex DNA is an altered interaction of the phenylalanine-substituted gp4 with the DNA at the fork to which it binds. We have measured the affinity of wild-type gp4 and the variant gp4s to both ssDNA and duplex DNA bearing a fork (Table 3). Wild-type helicase binds ssDNA and dsDNA with KD of 16 and 9 nm, respectively. gp4-F523A binds ssDNA and dsDNA with the KD value calculated to be ∼15-fold higher than wild-type gp4. gp4-F523V and gp4-F523I bind to ssDNA ∼4–6-fold weaker than wild-type gp4. In similar experiments gp4-F523V and gp4-F523I were shown to have higher KD values for dsDNA; ∼16- and 8-fold higher than wild-type protein. gp4-F523L, gp4-F523H, and gp4-F523Y did not exhibit any significant differences in binding ssDNA or dsDNA as compared with wild-type gp4 (Table 3). These results show that valine can substitute for phenylalanine for binding ssDNA but not for binding at a fork on dsDNA. The increase in the size of the functional group from valine to isoleucine or leucine increases the affinity of the protein to bind the fork on dsDNA, an increase that parallels with their unwinding activity. Histidine or tyrosine can also replace Phe523 with no significant defect in binding to ssDNA or to the fork on dsDNA. Again these proteins show only a marginal loss in unwinding activity.
TABLE 3.
Gp4-helicase | ssDNA (95-mer) |
Forked-end dsDNA (95 + 75-mer) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
KD | Relative binding | KD | Relative binding | |
nm | nm | |||
Wild-type | 16 ± 8 | 1 | 9 ± 1 | 1 |
F523A | 241 ± 15 | 15 | 157 ± 86 | 17 |
F523V | 101 ± 35 | 6 | 144 ± 48 | 16 |
F523I | 63 ± 13 | 4 | 69 ± 7 | 8 |
F523L | 17 ± 1 | 1 | 16 ± 2 | 2 |
F523H | 34 ± 15 | 2 | 21 ± 5 | 2 |
F523Y | 12 ± 2 | 1 | 9 ± 3 | 1 |
Oligomerization of gp4
The functional form of T7 DNA helicase is a hexamer. Although gp4 is found in the form of hexamers and heptamers in solution only hexamers are found to bind to DNA (25). Nucleotides play an essential role in the formation of stable hexamers. Wild-type gp4 monomers or dimers convert to the hexamer species in the presence of dTTP (26). At saturated concentrations of β,γ-methylene dTTP and ssDNA, wild-type gp4, and altered gp4s do not show any significant difference in forming hexamers even at low concentrations of protein (supplemental Fig. S5). Furthermore, the ability of the altered gp4 to oligomerize was measured on a 50-mer oligonucleotide in the presence of various concentrations of β,γ-methylene dTTP (0.01 to 1 mm) (Fig. 4A). The results from this ligand-dependent oligomeric assay show that gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V are relatively defective in forming hexamers at lower concentrations of β,γ-methylene dTTP (Fig. 4, A and B). The apparent KD values in terms of concentration of β,γ-methylene dTTP for hexamer formation by gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V are 8.4 and 6.3 μm, respectively, as compared with that of the wild-type KD value (1.2 μm) (27). gp4-F523I exhibits a KD of 3.5 μm for hexamer formation. However, gp4-F523L, gp4-F523H, and gp4-F523Y exhibit comparable KD values with wild-type gp4 to form hexamers and higher order oligomers (Fig. 4C). Despite showing defects for forming hexamers at lower nucleotide concentrations, all Phe523-altered helicases including gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V form more than 90% hexamers at 1 mm β,γ-methylene dTTP. At this concentration of dTTP, gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V did not exhibit any DNA unwinding activity; however, other Phe523-altered helicases exhibit unwinding activity perhaps based on the length or size of the side chain of the amino acid replaced for phenylalanine. Thus, the severe defects in DNA unwinding by gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V cannot be attributed solely to the differences in the ability of these proteins to form hexamers or higher order oligomers.
Strand-displacement DNA Synthesis Mediated by gp4 and T7 DNA Polymerase (gp5/trx)
T7 gene 5 protein functions in vivo in a 1 to 1 complex with its processivity factor, E. coli thioredoxin. This gene 5 polymerase/thioredoxin (gp5/trx) complex catalyzes processive DNA synthesis on ssDNA templates but is unable to catalyze strand-displacement DNA synthesis on duplex DNA (32, 33). However, in the presence of T7 DNA helicase, T7 gp5/trx mediates extensive strand-displacement DNA synthesis, a process that mimics leading strand DNA synthesis at a replication fork (34, 35). The ability of the altered helicases to support strand-displacement synthesis with gp5/trx was measured using circular M13 dsDNA bearing a 5′-ssDNA tail onto which gp4 can assemble. As anticipated, wild-type gp4 enables gp5/trx to mediate strand-displacement synthesis (Fig. 5A). gp4-F523I, gp4-F523L, and gp4-F523Y support strand-displacement DNA synthesis, albeit at a reduced rate (∼45–55% as compared with wild-type gp4) (Fig. 5A). gp4-F523H retains ∼75% of the wild-type activity. gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V, devoid of unwinding activity, do not support strand-displacement synthesis.
The dTTP hydrolysis activity that accompanies DNA unwinding and strand-displacement synthesis in these reactions was also measured (Fig. 5B). As a control dTTP hydrolysis was also measured during translocation of gp4 on M13 ssDNA in the presence of gp5/trx (Fig. 5C). Not surprising in view of their inability to mediate strand-displacement synthesis with gp5/trx, neither gp4-F523A nor gp4-F523V hydrolyzes dTTP on M13 dsDNA (Fig. 5B). However, as shown in Fig. 2 they do hydrolyze dTTP on ssDNA at ∼25% that observed with wild-type gp4; the presence of gp5/trx does not have any effect in these reactions (Fig. 5C). gp4-F523Y hydrolyzes dTTP at a faster rate than wild-type gp4 on M13 ssDNA, but retains only 50% of the rate of wild-type activity on M13 dsDNA. The results suggest that the dTTP hydrolysis activity on M13 ssDNA depends only on the translocation activity of the protein. However, dTTP hydrolysis in the presence of M13 dsDNA accompanies unwinding in conjunction with T7 gp5/trx. Therefore gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V retaining the ability to translocate on ssDNA, however, are defective in unwind dsDNA. The experiments also show that gp4-F523H exhibit dTTPase activity parallel to its unwinding rate in conjunction with gp5/trx at the replication fork progression (Fig. 5B).
Single-molecule Analysis of Strand-displacement Synthesis Mediated by gp4 and T7 gp5/trx
gp4-F523H complements for T7Δ4 phage growth and the purified protein mediates leading strand synthesis in association with T7 gp5/trx. However, gp4-F523H has only 30% of the DNA-dependent dTTP hydrolysis activity but exhibit 75% of the strand-displacement activity as compared with that of wild-type helicase. On the other hand gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V also retains a considerable level of dTTP hydrolysis activity (20%), but are significantly defective in DNA unwinding and strand-displacement synthesis activity. Earlier we found that gp4-K467A, an altered gp4 with an alanine substituted a lysine in the central β-hairpin, has 15% of the wild-type rates of dTTP hydrolysis activity but no significant unwinding activity (22). However, gp4-K467A complements for gp4 function in vivo. By using single-molecule techniques we showed that gp4-K467A can support T7 DNA polymerase for leading strand synthesis at a rate comparable with that observed with wild-type gp4. In the present study, we have examined the wild-type gp4 and the altered proteins: gp4-F523H and gp4-F523V for T7 gp5/trx-mediated leading strand synthesis.
Single-molecule analysis of strand-displacement synthesis was carried out as previously described (22, 29) and is shown schematically in Fig. 6A. Bacteriophage λ duplex DNA (48.5 kb) containing a replication fork is attached to a glass flow cell via the 5′-end of one strand whose 3′-end is linked to a 2.8-μm sized bead. A constant laminar flow is applied such that the resultant drag on the bead stretches the DNA molecule with a force of 3 piconewton. At this force the elasticity of the DNA is determined by entropic contributions and thus does not influence protein interactions with DNA (29). The ssDNA, due to coiling, is shorter than dsDNA at low stretching forces (<6 piconewton). Consequently, the conversion of dsDNA to ssDNA as a result of leading-strand synthesis can be monitored through a decrease in length of DNA. The change in lengths of individual DNA molecules is measured by imaging the beads and tracking their positions.
In the present experiment the bound DNA was preincubated with T7 DNA polymerase/thioredoxin (gp5/trx) and T7 gp4 with the four dNTPs but in the absence of Mg2+ for 15 min. The flow cell was then washed with 3 flow cell volumes of buffer containing the dNTPs. DNA synthesis was initiated by introducing buffer containing dNTPs and MgCl2. Examples of single molecule trajectories for leading strand synthesis obtained with wild-type gp4, gp4-F523H, and gp4-F523V are shown (Fig. 6B). With wild-type gp4 and gp5/trx, leading strand synthesis proceeded at a rate of 112 ± 24 bp/s (n = 21) with a processivity of 16 ± 4 kbp (Fig. 6C), in good agreement with previous results (22, 29, 30). gp4-F523H was also able to support strand-displacement synthesis with a rate of 87 ± 24 bp/s (n = 13) and a processivity of 12 ± 5 kbp. Unlike gp4-K467A, as described above, gp4-F523V did not support strand-displacement synthesis in these experiments. We have analyzed more than 50 events for the gp4-F523V-mediated strand-displacement synthesis, however, none of them showed a considerable bead movement. In similar reaction conditions gp4-F523A also behaved like gp4-F523V (data not shown). These single molecule results support the data obtained with the ensemble experiments.
Interaction of gp4 with T7 Gp5/trx
Gene 4 protein and T7 gp5/trx have multiple modes of interaction (30). In one mode the acidic C-terminal tail of gp4 interacts with two basic loops located in the thioredoxin-binding domain of T7 DNA polymerase. This electrostatic mode captures DNA polymerase that may dissociate from the primer-template and delivers it back to the primer. When T7 gp5/trx is in a polymerizing mode, gp4 forms a complex of high affinity that does not require the electrostatic mode. To find out whether the lack of support by gp4-F523V in leading strand synthesis is not associated with its inability to interact with gp5/trx, we measured the binding of altered gp4s (gp4-F523V and gp4-F523H) to T7 gp5/trx both in the absence and presence of DNA using surface plasmon resonance.
In the absence of DNA gp4 was bound to a CM5 chip and gp5/trx flowed over the bound gp4 (Fig. 7A). In the presence of a primer-template, the primer-template was attached to a SA chip and gp5/trx was flowed over the bound primer-template in the presence of a dideoxynucleoside triphosphate complementary to the first nucleotide in a template position. This procedure essentially locks the polymerase into a polymerizing mode (30). Then gp4 is flowed over the polymerase, primer-template complex, and the change in surface plasmon resonance was measured (Fig. 7B and supplemental Fig. S6). The binding of gp4 with gp5/trx is tighter in the presence of primer-template as compared with its absence (30). As expected, in our experiments, wild-type gp4 bound to the gp5/trx with a KD of 110 and 38 nm in the absence and presence of primer-template, respectively (Fig. 7C). Unlike wild-type gp4, the binding of the gp4-F523H or gp4-F523V with T7 gp5/trx did not change significantly in the absence or presence of the primer-template (Fig. 7C). Although there is a difference between the binding of wild-type gp4 and altered gp4 with gp5/trx in the presence of primer-template, the difference cannot be attributed to the defect of gp4-F523V for its inability to support strand-displacement synthesis because in such an experiment we did not observe any significant difference in the binding of gp4-F523H or gp4-F523V with gp5/trx.
DISCUSSION
The helicase encoded by bacteriophage T7 is a multifunctional protein that plays an essential role in unwinding dsDNA to provide a template for T7 DNA polymerase on the leading strand. Structural studies of several hexameric helicases suggest a general model by which DNA binding loops move within the central channel of the functional hexamer as a function of the NTP hydrolysis cycle (36). Despite the differences in the nucleotide-binding site architecture of hexameric helicases from SF IV (T7 gp4, E. coli DnaB, and T4 gp41), and AAA+ ATPases (MCM, BPV E1), these enzymes appear to translocate on ssDNA using a mechanism involving the sequential hydrolysis of NTP. It has been hypothesized that during the unwinding of duplex DNA, the translocation of these ring helicases on one strand of DNA excludes the complementary strand from its central channel (37–39). The hexameric helicases require dsDNA bearing 5′- and 3′-ssDNA tails; T7 helicase cannot initiate unwinding on either a blunt end DNA or a DNA with only one ssDNA tail (16–18, 40). However, it is not known if the excluded strand interacts with the surface of the helicase. In this study, we have examined an amino acid, phenylalanine 523, on the surface of T7 DNA helicase that undergoes conformational changes upon changes in the state of hydrolysis of dTTP and that has the potential to contact the DNA.
Previous reports identified residues responsible for coupling nucleotide hydrolysis with the unwinding of DNA (20–22). These residues lie in proximity to the nucleotide-binding sites located at the interfaces of the subunits of the hexamer. From the crystal structure of T7 DNA helicase, we identified a β-hairpin structure located at the subunit interface that shows a difference in conformation based on the presence of a nucleotide in the nucleotide-binding site. The β-hairpin commences at Arg522 (arginine finger), which makes contact with the γ-phosphate of the bound nucleotide. Once hydrolysis takes place, Arg522 is displaced from the active site and probably makes contact with Glu348 on the adjacent subunit. In the process, the rest of the β-hairpin undergoes a conformational change, positioning itself toward the exterior surface of the protein. Phe523 lies at the tip of this β-hairpin and is thus in a position to interact with DNA (Fig. 1). This phenomenon is analogous to the central β-hairpin in gp4, where His465 acts as a phosphate sensor and plays an important role in conveying the occupancy of the nucleotide in the subunit interface to the ssDNA-binding site at the center of the ring, this communication facilitates ssDNA-dependent stimulation of dTTP hydrolysis (22).
Our results show that substituting alanine or valine for Phe523 results in defective coupling of dTTP hydrolysis to unwinding of dsDNA. These altered helicases retain >20% of the wild-type level of dTTP hydrolysis activity. The reduced dTTP hydrolysis activity may be due to their relatively weak ability to form hexamers and thus low affinity for ssDNA in the reactions as evidenced by the ligand-dependent oligomerization assays, and the effect of ssDNA on dTTP hydrolysis. The order of DNA unwinding activity by helicases with substitutions for Phe523 are gp4-F523I ≤ gp4-F523L = gp4-F523Y ≤ gp4-F523H. This order of unwinding is the exact opposite of their ability to hydrolyze dTTP in the presence of M13 ssDNA. Isoleucine can substitute for Phe523 in ssDNA-dependent dTTP hydrolysis activity. However, the gp4-F523I binds to dsDNA 8-fold less tightly than wild-type gp4, presumably the explanation for its low rate of unwinding activity. The rate of DNA unwinding increases with an increase in the size of the functional group from isoleucine or leucine to tyrosine and histidine. This order also correlates well with their binding affinity to dsDNA. Thus, gp4-F523H retains 70% of the wild-type level of unwinding activity despite having only 30% dTTPase activity. gp4-F523H thus efficiently couples dTTP hydrolysis to the unwinding of dsDNA. Compared with wild-type gp4, gp4-F523H exhibits a 2-fold higher efficiency in coupling dTTP hydrolysis with unwinding. However, wild-type gp4 performs an overall higher rate of unwinding. Taken together, these results suggest that Phe523 plays a role in coupling the energy released from the hydrolysis of dTTP to the unwinding of duplex DNA.
On the basis of our results and the crystal structure analysis, we propose that Phe523 interacts with the excluded strand (Fig. 8). We speculate that in the process of DNA unwinding at a replication fork one strand passes through the central channel by making interactions with the residues in the central β-hairpins, whereas the excluded strand interacts with the outer parts of the ring through Phe523 of the subunit-interface β-hairpins. These contacts can possibly rotate the two ssDNA strands with respect to each other and facilitate destabilizing the duplex DNA. The ssDNA, passing through the central channel, is transferred from one subunit to the adjacent one parallel with the sequential hydrolysis of NTP around the ring. However, it remains to be determined if the excluded strand is passed from one subunit to another using Phe523 on each of the subunits. A recent report on the mechanism of DNA unwinding by MCM helicase demonstrates that the excluded strand makes contact with the exterior surface of the ring and wraps around the outer surface to provide stability to the DNA helicase complex for an efficient unwinding (41). We also examined the ability of the altered helicases to interact with T7 gp5/trx to mediate strand-displacement DNA synthesis, the equivalent of leading strand DNA synthesis at a replication fork. gp4-F523A and gp4-F523V cannot catalyze the unwinding of duplex DNA despite having considerable ssDNA-dependent dTTP hydrolysis. gp4-F523V and gp4-F523H bind equally well to T7 gp5/trx in the absence or presence of primer-template. Thus the defect of gp4-F523V for not supporting the strand-displacement synthesis is not due to its inability to interact with the T7 gp5/trx, rather the reason would be its own defect in coupling NTP hydrolysis with DNA unwinding. We propose that Phe523 is crucial for unwinding a duplex DNA junction ahead of polymerase during leading strand synthesis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Steven Moskowitz (Advanced Medical Graphics) and Joseph Lee for illustrations. We give special thanks to Dr. Jaya Singh for valuable suggestions on the manuscript. We are grateful to all the members of the Charles Richardson lab for helpful discussions and constructive comments.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant GM54397 (to C. C. R.).
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S1–S6.
- ssDNA
- single-stranded DNA
- dsDNA
- double-stranded DNA
- gp5/trx
- gene 5 polymerase/thioredoxin
- AMPPNP
- 5′-adenylyl-β,γ-imidodiphosphate.
REFERENCES
- 1. Richardson C. C. (1983) Cell 33, 315–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hamdan S. M., Richardson C. C. (2009) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 205–243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Frick D. N., Richardson C. C. (2001) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 39–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zhu B., Lee S. J., Richardson C. C. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 23842–23851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Singleton M. R., Dillingham M. S., Wigley D. B. (2007) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 23–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Egelman E. H., Yu X., Wild R., Hingorani M. M., Patel S. S. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 3869–3873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kim D. E., Narayan M., Patel S. S. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 321, 807–819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Tabor S., Richardson C. C. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 205–209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Singleton M. R., Sawaya M. R., Ellenberger T., Wigley D. B. (2000) Cell 101, 589–600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Crampton D. J., Mukherjee S., Richardson C. C. (2006) Mol. Cell 21, 165–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Liao J. C., Jeong Y. J., Kim D. E., Patel S. S., Oster G. (2005) J. Mol. Biol. 350, 452–475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Johnson D. S., Bai L., Smith B. Y., Patel S. S., Wang M. D. (2007) Cell 129, 1299–1309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Donmez I., Patel S. S. (2006) Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 4216–4224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Donmez I., Patel S. S. (2008) EMBO J. 27, 1718–1726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Matson S. W., Richardson C. C. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 14009–14016 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Matson S. W., Tabor S., Richardson C. C. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 14017–14024 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ahnert P., Patel S. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32267–32273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kaplan D. L. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 301, 285–299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Galletto R., Jezewska M. J., Bujalowski W. (2004) J. Mol. Biol. 343, 101–114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Washington M. T., Rosenberg A. H., Griffin K., Studier F. W., Patel S. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26825–26834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Crampton D. J., Guo S., Johnson D. E., Richardson C. C. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 4373–4378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Satapathy A. K., Kochaniak A. B., Mukherjee S., Crampton D. J., van Oijen A., Richardson C. C. (2010) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 6782–6787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mendelman L. V., Notarnicola S. M., Richardson C. C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 27208–27213 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Notarnicola S. M., Park K., Griffith J. D., Richardson C. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20215–20224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Crampton D. J., Ohi M., Qimron U., Walz T., Richardson C. C. (2006) J. Mol. Biol. 360, 667–677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Picha K. M., Patel S. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27315–27319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Satapathy A. K., Richardson C. C. (2011) J. Biol. Chem. 286, 23113–23120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Satapathy A. K., Crampton D. J., Beauchamp B. B., Richardson C. C. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 14286–14295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lee J. B., Hite R. K., Hamdan S. M., Xie X. S., Richardson C. C., van Oijen A. M. (2006) Nature 439, 621–624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hamdan S. M., Johnson D. E., Tanner N. A., Lee J. B., Qimron U., Tabor S., van Oijen A. M., Richardson C. C. (2007) Mol. Cell 27, 539–549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Mendelman L. V., Notarnicola S. M., Richardson C. C. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 10638–10642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kolodner R., Richardson C. C. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 1525–1529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Stano N. M., Jeong Y. J., Donmez I., Tummalapalli P., Levin M. K., Patel S. S. (2005) Nature 435, 370–373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lechner R. L., Richardson C. C. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 11185–11196 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lechner R. L., Engler M. J., Richardson C. C. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 11174–11184 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Enemark E. J., Joshua-Tor L. (2008) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 243–257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Jeong Y. J., Levin M. K., Patel S. S. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 7264–7269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kaplan D. L., Davey M. J., O'Donnell M. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 49171–49182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Patel S. S., Picha K. M. (2000) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 651–697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Rothenberg E., Trakselis M. A., Bell S. D., Ha T. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 34229–34234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Graham B. W., Schauer G. D., Leuba S. H., Trakselis M. A. (2011) Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 6585–6595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.