Abstract Abstract
The genus Deuterixys Mason, 1981 of the tribe Cotesiini (Hymenopteran, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) is recorded from China for the first time. Two new species, Deuterixys bifossalis Zeng & Chen, sp. n. and Deuterixys curticalcar Zeng & Chen, sp. n., are described and illustrated, and a key to the Old World species of Deuterixys is given. In addition, Wilkinsonellus paramplus Long & van Achterberg, 2003 is recorded from China for the first time and illustrated.
Keywords: Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae, Cotesiini, Deuterixys, Wilkinsonellus, new species, key, China
Introduction
The tribe Cotesiini (Braconidae, Microgastrinae) was established by Mason (1981) with most members parasitizing on Macrolepidoptera. A few species of this tribe have been used in biological control of lepidopteran pests. The genera Deuterixys and Wilkinsonellus are two small genera of this tribe, and both characterized by a longitudinal median groove at least at basal half of the first tergite and without an areolet of fore wing.
The genus Deuterixys proposed by Mason (1981) includes four Old World species of Nixon’s (1965, 1976) carbonarius group of Apanteles Förster. This genus includes 14 described species widespread in the world except in the Afrotropical region, of which seven occur in the Old World and seven in the New World (Nixon 1965; Tobias 1971, 1976; Papp 1983b, 1990; Whitfield 1985; Austin and Dangerfield 1992; Marczak and Buszko 1994; Yu et al. 2005). Most species of the known hosts of this genus are leaf miners, including the genera Bucculatrix and Leucoptera of the family Lyonetiidae and Stigmella of the family Nepticulidae (Lyle 1925; Wilkinson 1936, 1940; Telenga 1955; Nixon 1965; Tobias 1976, 1986; Papp 1983a; Whitfield 1985; Marczak and Buszko 1994; Gates et al. 2002), which may cause damage in forests. Therefore, species of Deuterixys may play an important role in controlling those forest pests. Recently two new species of this genus are found in China among specimens of Parasitic Hymenoptera Collection of Zhejiang University (ZJUH) and described in this paper. They represent the first record of the genus Deuterixys Mason for China.
The genus Wilkinsonellus was proposed by Mason (1981) to include four Old World species of Nixon’s (1965) henicopus and daira group of Apanteles Förster, including five described species occurring in Oriental region, four in the Australasian region and one in the Afrotropical region (De Saeger 1944; Nixon 1965; Austin and Dangerfield 1992; Chou 1999; Long and van Achterberg 2003; Chen and Song 2004; Ahmad et al. 2005; Yu et al. 2005). One species, Wilkinsonellus iphitus (Nixon 1965) was previously recorded from Hainan and Taiwan of China (Chou 1999; Chen and Song 2004). Here we report another species of this genus, Wilkinsonellus paramplus Long & van Achterberg, 2003, from China for the first time.
Material and methods
Specimens studied are deposited in the Parasitic Hymenoptera Collection of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (ZJUH). Descriptions and measurements were made under a stereomicroscope (Zeiss Stemi 2000-C). All figures were made by a camera (Q-Imaging, Micropublisher, 3.3 RTV) attached to a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ APO, Germany) and Auto-Montage Pro version 5.0 software.
Terminology and measurement follows Nixon (1965) and Mason (1981), vein terminology follows the modified Comstock-Needham system (van Achterberg 1979). Abbreviations used in this paper are as follows: POL = postocellar line, OOL = ocular-ocellar line, OD = ccellar diameter; TI = the first tergite of metasoma, TII = the second tergite of metasoma, TIII = the third tergite of metasoma; L = length, W = width.
Taxonomy
Genus. Deuterixys
Mason, 1981
http://species-id.net/wiki/Deuterixys
Deuterixys Mason 1981, 115: 123; Whitfeild 1985, 61(1): 60; Marsh et al. 1987, 13: 31; Whitfield and Wagner 1991, 25: 737; Austin and Dangerfield 1992, 6(1): 23.
Type species:
Microgaster carbonarius Wesmael, 1835. Designated by Mason 1981.
Diagonosis.
Areolet of fore wing absent; propodeum polished and bearing a strong long medial carina; TI of metasoma with medio-basal longitudinal groove; TII and III broad, rectangular, and noticeably constricted or abruptly widened at the suture between them; ovipositor sheaths short, decurved and subexerted.
Key to the Old World species of the genus Deuterixys Mason, 1981
1 | TII+III enlarged to form a coarsely rugose carapace that completely hides the more apical segments; posterior margin of this carapace finely crenulate laterally. [Mesoscutum shiny, closely, rather strongly punctate for the size of the insect; hind coxa and underside of metasoma bright yellow; propodeum polished and with a strong medial keel; length: 1.8 mm] | Deuterixys patro Nixon, 1965 |
– | TII+III not thus enlarged, notched at the position of second suture but its posterior margin is membranous and smooth, the more apical segments exposed | 2 |
2 | TII less transverse, at most 1.7–1.8 times wider behind than long medially; legs yellow, hind tibia and tarsus more or less infuscate | 3 |
– | TII more transverse, twice wider behind than long medially; legs dark brown, blackish to black | 4 |
3 | Vein 2-CU1 of fore wing twice as long as vein 1-CU1; TIII rugose to rugulose; preapical segment of antenna short, hardly twice as long as wide | Deuterixys condarensis (Tobias, 1960) |
– | Vein 2-CU1 of fore wing as long as vein 1-CU1; TIII smooth and shiny; preapical segment of antenna long, more than twice as long as wide | Deuterixys bifossalis Zeng & Chen, sp. n. |
4 | TIII densely rugulose or subrugulose, dull; TII with rugosity almost similar to that of TI; TI parallel- or indistinctly subparallel-sided; propodeum medially with more or less transverse rugulosities along medial longitudinal keel, otherwise propodeum smooth | 5 |
– | TIII chagreened or almost smooth, shiny; TI converging apically; propodeum smooth, at most with a few and very short rugulae along hind carina and above lunule | 6 |
5 | TI subrectangular, 1.2–1.3 times as long as wide; TII almost as long as TIII; inner hind tibial spurs much longer than half length of hind basitarsus | Deuterixys carbonaria (Wesmael, 1837) |
– | TI more than 1.5 times longer than wide; TII distinctly longer than TIII; inner hind tibial spurs shorter than half length of hind basitarsus | Deuterixys curticalcar Zeng & Chen, sp. n. |
6 | Vein 1-R1 of fore wing as long as or slightly shorter than pterostigma. [TI posteriorly weakly to moderately converging, its basal width at most 1/3 greater than its apical width. Pterostigma less wide, 2.7–2.9 (-3.0) times longer than wide. First tergite always entirely black. Tegula brownish black to brownish yellow. Middle and hind femora black(ish)] | Deuterixys rimulosa (Niezabitowski, 1910) |
– | Vein 1-R1 slightly longer than pterostigma | 7 |
7 | TI wedge-shaped, 1.6–2 times longer than wide at base; TII shorter than TIII, somewhat less transverse, twice wider behind than long medially; pterostigma 2.3–2.4 times longer than wide | Deuterixys plugarui (Tobias, 1975) |
– | T1 widest about 2/3 distance from its base, anterior third and posteriorly with weakly converging sides, about 1.5 times longer than wide; TII slightly longer than TIII, somewhat more transverse, 2.2 times wider behind than long medially; pterostigma about 3 times longer than wide | Deuterixys anica Austin & Dangerfield, 1992 |
Deuterixys bifossalis
Zeng & Chen sp. n.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B29EDB9A-C1FD-4FF6-BD77-94DB7D91236C
http://species-id.net/wiki/Deuterixys_bifossalis
Description.
Female.
Body length 3.68 mm, fore wing length 3.20 mm.
Head. In frontal view antennal sockets just above middle level of eyes, 1.6 times as wide as long and 1.1 times as that of mesoscutum. Ocelli large and in a equilateral triangle, POL: OD: OOL=3.6:4.0:2.7. Frons and vertex smooth and shiny, scattered with short fine setae; vertex sharply narrowed behind eyes, area behind ocellar area sharply oblique, smooth and shiny, without setae; temple and gena feebly punctate and shiny, with dense setae. Face and clypeus shiny but feebly rugulose-punctate, with dense short fine setae; width of face 0.5 times height of eye and clypeus combined (16.3:31.2); inner margins of eyes adjacent to face parallel-sided; eyes very large, 1.5 times as high as wide (31:21), temple behind eyes very short. Tentorial pits large, distance between tentorial pits 5 times distance from pit to eye margin; malar space very short, 0.1 times as long as eye height; apical segment of labial palp longer than the two preceding segments, respectively. Antenna longer than body; flagellomeres with placodes arranged regularly in 2 ranks; the third flagellum slightly longer than the fourth flagellum; apical segment as long as preapical one; preapical segment 2.3 times as long as wide. Flagellomere proportions: 2 L/W=2.92, 8 L/W=2.40, 14 L/W=2.50; L 2/14=1.40; W 2/14=1.20.
Mesosoma. Mesoscutum densely and evenly punctate and setose; notauli not impressed, but indicated by a band of shallow and dense duller sculpture. Disc of scutellum also densely punctate, its rugose tip interrupting the posterior, polished band of scutellum, with dense short setae all over; scutellar sulcus deep with a few strong carina and 1.2 times as long as scutellum (15.5:12.8). Propodeum highly polished, virtually without sculpture except for a strong medial longitudinal carina and weak transverse ridges in immediate vicinity of longitudinal carina and lateral margin, with strong rugae distal to spiracle. Epicnemial furrow distinct, area before it raised above rest of mesopleuron; precoxal sulcus short, shallow, only indicated by few punctures anteriorly. Mesosternum with dense setigerous punctures. Lateral metanotum mostly smooth and shiny, with longitudinal striae posteriorly and below spiracle.
Wings. Forewing without areolet, radial vein r arising from distal third of pterostigma; veins r and 2-SR meeting at a 165~170 degree angle; r:2-SR: length of pterostigma = 13:10:31; vein 1-R1 1.3 times as long as pterostigma, pterostigma 2.5 times as long as wide. 1-CU1:2-CU1:m-cu=11:11:8. Hind wing narrow.
Legs. Hind coxa shiny, feebly punctate, scattered with short setae. Hind tibia gradually swollen apically and about 0.9 times as long as hind tarsa (54.5:63.9); inner hind tibial spurs about 0.9 times as long as hind basitarus (22.0:25.8); forth tarsal segment slightly shorter than fifth tarsal segment (7.8:8.4). Hind tibia with few spines on outer side, rather fine and not dense enough to give the tibia a markedly prickly appearance.
Metasoma. TI dilated medially, the greatest medial width 1.5 times its apical width, with strong medial longitudinal groove almost reaching to posterior margin, 1.5 times as long as its greatest width and 2.1 times as long as TII, medial groove with a shallow transverse carina. TII+III slightly constricted at extreme apex of second suture. TII subtrapezoid, 0.6 times as long as its basal width and 0.9 times as long as TIII, with a pair of strong rugulose-marked longitudinal grooves delimiting a median field that slightly narrowed posteriorly. TIII rectangular, smooth and shiny, with anterior margin arched medially, median field not indicated. Tergites posterior to TIII more membranous, shiny. All tergites scattered with setae. Ovipositor sheath shorter, 0.7 times as long as hind basitarsus. Hypopygium strongly and evenly sclerotized, blunt but not truncated apically, sparsely clothed with short setae.
Colour. Body mostly yellow; head evenly yellow except for black ocellar area; mesosoma brown except for yellow mesoscutum and scutellar disc; mesopleuron yellow except epicnemium. Antenna evenly yellowish brown, scape brownish dorsally, pedicel yellow; palpi and tegula whitish yellow. Legs whitish yellow basally, slightly darkened toward apex, claws brown, extreme apex of hind femur and tibia and extreme base of hind tibia brownish. Sternites of metasoma whitish yellow; TI light yellow, the other tergites brown and gradually paler apically. Wings hyaline, very slightly infuscate; veins brown but veins 1-R1, A and M+Cu grey, pterostigma brown.
Male.
Unknown.
Host.
Unknown for this species, but all previous host records from Europe and North America indicate that Deuterixys spp. are parasites of Bucculatrix spp. (Bucculatricidae) (Nixon 1965, Mason 1981, Whitfield 1985).
Materials examined.
Holotype: ♀, Mt. Qingliangfeng (118°52'E, 30°04'N; 119°12'E, 30°31'N), Linan, Zhejiang, 2005. VIII. 9, leg. Min Shi, No. 200607234. Paratype: 1♀, Mt. Yinggeling (109°31'E, N19°04'N), Hain0061n, 2007. V. 24–25, leg. Jingxian Liu, No. 200702641.
Etymology.
The specific name “bifossalis” derives from the Latin prefixion “bi-” and adjective “fossalis”, referring to both distinct lateral grooves enclosing a median field of the second tergite.
Distribution.
China (Zhejiang, Hainan).
Remark.
This species is similar to the Palaearctic species Deuterixys rimulosa (Niezabitowski, 1910), but can be distinguished from the latter by having TI not transverse (more transverse in Deuterixys rimulosa), and vein 1-R1 of fore wing longer than pterostigma (the latter subequal to or slightly shorter). It also differs from the other Oriental species Deuterixys patro (Nixon, 1965) by TII and TIII not forming a carapace and having exposed the following tergites (the latter TII and TIII enlarged to form a carapace and following tergites retracted).
Deuterixys curticalcar
Zeng & Chen sp. n.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:34B734EE-BBE6-44D0-AA54-8275B151633F
http://species-id.net/wiki/Deuterixys_curticalcar
Description.
Female.
Body length 2.04 mm, fore wing length 2.24 mm.
Head. In frontal view antennal sockets distinctly above middle level of eyes, head 1.6 times as wide as long and 1.1 times as that of mesoscutum. Ocelli small and in a high triangle, POL: OD: OOL=4.0:2.4:6.2. Frons and vertex smooth and shiny, covered with dense short fine setae; vertex sharply narrowed behind eyes, area behind ocellar area sharply oblique, smooth and shiny, without setae; temple and gena feebly striate and shiny, with dense setae; face shiny and discretely but distinctly punctate, 0.9 times as wide as height of eye and clypeus combined, with dense setae; inner margins of eyes adjacent to face slightly converging ventrally; eye moderate size, 1.7 times as high as wide (15.6:9.0), temple behind eyes subequal in length to width of eye. Clypeus feebly rugulose, with dense short fine setae; tentorial pits small, distance between tentorial pits twice distance from pit to eye margin (5.7:2.8); malar space short, 0.2 times as long as eye height; apical segment of labial palp longer than the preceding segment but shorter than the next preceding segment. Antenna longer than body; flagellomeres with placodes arranged regularly in 2 ranks except the apical 6 segments; the third flagellomere subequal to the forth flagellomere in length; apical segment slightly longer than preapical one. Flagellomere proportions: 2 L/W=4.10, 8 L/W=4.05, 14 L/W=1.88; L 2/14=2.00; W 2/14=0.92.
Mesosoma. Mesoscutum densely and evenly punctate, with normal setae; notauli absent. Disc of scutellum as densely punctate as mesoscutum, with normal setae; the posterior, polished band of scutellum continuous, not interrupted medially; scutellar sulcus shallow with a few weak carinae and as long as scutellum. Propodeum highly polished, virtually without sculpture except for a strong medial longitudinal carina and very short transverse ridges in immediate vicinity of longitudinal carina and lateral margin, with strong rugae around spiracle. Epicnemial furrow indistinct, area before it slightly raised above rest of mesopleuron; precoxal suture indistinct, only indicated by a large shallow depression. Mesosternum with dense fine setigerous punctures. Laterally metanotum mostly smooth and shiny.
Wings. Forewing without areolet, radial vein r arising from middle of pterostigma; veins r and 2-SR meeting at an angle of almost 170 degree; r:2-SR:length of pterostigma = 7.5:6.5:23.0; vein 1-R1 1.1 times as long as pterostigma, pterostigma 2.6 times as long as wide. 1-CU1:2-CU1: m-cu=6.5:7.0:7.3. Hind wing narrow.
Legs. Hind coxa shiny, highly polished, scattered with short setae on anterior 2/3. Hind tibia gradually swollen apically and 0.9 times as long as hind tarsus (33.0:38.8); inner hind tibial spurs 0.4 times as long as hind basitarsus (6.0:15.5); forth tarsal segment much shorter than fifth tarsal segment (4.5:7.0). Hind tibia without trace of spines on outer side.
Metasoma. TI parallel-sided, with a very feebly rugose triangular area and a strong and smooth medial longitudinal groove on anterior 2/5, densely rugulose and turns over on posterior 3/5, 1.6 times as long as its greatest width and 1.5 times as long as tergite II. TII+III constricted at the level of the crenulate second suture. TII rectangular, densely and strongly rugose, with strong longitudinal striae posteriorly, without trace of median field, 0.6 times as long as its basal width and 1.7 times as long as tergite III. TIII transverse, broadened posteriorly, longitudinally aciculate-rugulose and densely and strongly rugulose. Tergites posterior to TIII more membranous, shiny; all tergites with scattered short fine setae. Ovipositor sheath very short, only 0.4 times as long as hind basitarsus, curved downwards. Hypopygium short, strongly and evenly sclerotized, truncated apically, sparsely clothed with long setae.
Colour. Body mostly black; metasoma brownish to light brown except black TI to TIII. Antenna almost brown, basal third yellowish ventrally. Mouthparts yellow with brown margin, palpi white. Tegula brown. Legs yellow, somewhat whitish; fore and middle coxae brownish laterally, all claws brown; hind coxa and tarsus brown; hind tibia brownish and darkened apically, its apical third strongly darkened. Wings hyaline; veins grey except brown submarginal vein, pterostigma grey and laterally brown.
Variation. Vein 1-SR 1.1–1.4 times as long as pterostigma, pterostigma 2.6–3 times as long as wide. Veins and pterostigma light brown, more or less transparent. Antenna, mouthparts and tegula sometimes darkened.
Male.
Unknown.
Host.
Unknown for this species but all previous host records from Europe and North America indicate that Deuterixys spp. are parasites of Bucculatrix spp. (Bucculatricidae) (Nixon 1965, Mason 1981, Whitfield 1985).
Materials examined.
Holotype: ♀, main peak of Mt. Huping (110°45E, 30°02'N ~ 110°55'E, 30°07'N), Shimen, Hunan, 2009. VII. 12, legs. Zeng Jie, No. 200900720. Paratype: 2♀♀, Main peak of Mt. Huping (110°45'E, 30°02'N ~ 110°55'E, 30°07'N), Shimen, Hunan, 2009. VII. 12, legs. Zeng Jie, No. 200900716, 200900745; 1♀, Mt. Huping (110°45'E, 30°02'N ~ 110°55'E, 30°07'N), Sanhecun, Shimen, Hunan, 2009. VII. 13, legs. Zeng Jie, No. 200901663; 2♀♀, Mt. Huping (110°45'E, 30°02'N ~ 110°55'E, 30°07'N), Sanhecun, Shimen, Hunan, 2009. VII. 11, legs. Tang Pu, No. 200901072, 200901079; 2♀♀, Mt. Huping (110°45'E, 30°02'N ~ 110°55'E, 30°07'N), Sanhecun, Shimen, Hunan, 2009. VII. 11, legs. Ma Li, No. 200901910, 200901952; 1♀, Mt. Huping (110°45'E, 30°02'N ~ 110°55'E, 30°07'N), Sanhecun, Shimen, Hunan, 2009. VII. 13, legs. Ma Li, No. 200901011; 1♀, Mt. Jingang(114°06'E, 26°31'N ~ 114°10'E, 26°34'N), Jiangxi, 2007. VIII. 13, legs. He Junhua, No. 200704967; 1♀, Jietou (98°37'E, 25°22'N ~ 98°39'E, 25°27'N), Tengchong, Yunnan, 2006. VII. 11–12, legs. Zeng Jie, No. 200801766; 1♀, Nankang (98°46'E, 24°48'N ~ 98°47'E, 24°49'N), Lujiangba, Baoshan, Yunnan, 2009. V. 9, legs. Zeng Jie, No. 200904232; 1♀, Mt. Leigong (118°03'E, 26°21'N ~ 118°15'E, 26°25'N), Xiaodanjiang, Guizhou, 2005. VI. 4, legs. Zhang Hongying, No. 200606086; 1♀, Kuankuoshui Natural Reserve(107°24'E, 30°37'N ~ 107°24'E, 30°37'N), Guizhou, 2010. VI. 5, legs. Zeng Jie, No. 201004665; 1♀, Datianding, Mt. Dawuling (111°11'E, 22°16'N ~ 111°13'E, 22°18'N), Guangdong, 2001. X. 3, legs. Xu Zaifu, No. 20020629; 1♀, Mt. Chebaling (114°14'E, 24°43'N ~ 114°16'E, 24°44'N), Shixing, Guangdong, 2003. VIII. 21, legs. Xu Zaifu, No. 20053046; 2♀♀, Baotianman (111°55'E, 33°29'N ~ 111°58'E, 33°32'N), Neixiang, Henan, 1998. VII. 14, legs. Chen Xuexin, No. 988733, 988741; 1♀, Hongxia tree farm, Mt. Liupan (106°13'E, 35°43'N ~ 106°17'E, 35°45'N), Jingyuan, Ningxia, 2008. VI. 1, legs. Liu Jingxian, No. 200905594; 1♀, Guamagou, Mt. Liupan (106°19'E, 35°46'N ~ 106°21'E, 35°47'N), Pengyang, Ningxia, 2008. VI. 9–10, legs. Liu Jingxian, No. 200904351; 1♀, Yehegu, Xixia tree farm, Mt. Liupan (106°13'E, 35°29'N ~ 106°17'E, 35°31'N), Jingyuan, Ningxia, 2008. VI. 11–12, legs. Liu Jingxian, No. 200905857.
Etymology.
The specific name “curticalcar” derives from the Latin prefixion “curti-” and noun “calcar”, referring to the short hind tibial spurs.
Distribution.
China (Jiangxi, Henan, Hunan, Guangdong, Guizhou, Yunnan, Ningxia).
Remark.
This species is similar to the Palaearctic species Deuterixys carbonaria (Wesmael, 1837), but can be distinguished from the latter by having TI long, more than 1.5 times as long as wide (TI subrectangular, 1.2–1.3 times as long as wide in Deuterixys carbonaria); TII much longer than TIII (TII almost as long as TIII); and inner hind tibial spurs shorter than 0.5 times hind basitarsus (much more than 0.5 times hind basitarsus).
Genus. Wilkinsonellus
Mason, 1981
Wilkinsonellus Mason 1981, 115: 122; Austin and Dangerfield 1992, 6(1): 23; Chen and Song 2004: 202; Whitefield 1997, 1: 12. Type species: Apanteles iphitus Nixon, 1965. Designated by Mason 1981.
Diagonosis.
Areolet of fore wing absent; nervellus of hind wing not sinuate. Propodeum often with a medial longitudinal carina, sometimes smooth or rugulose or strigose with indistinct carina. TI-TIII not forming a carapace; TI 4–5 times as long as its apical width, more or less constricted medially and deeply grooved almost to apex.
Wilkinsonellus paramplus
Long & van Achterberg, 2003
http://species-id.net/wiki/Wilkinsonellus_paramplus
Wilkinsonellus paramplus Long& van Achterberg, 2003, 77(10): 223. Holotype female, pinned with labels as follows: “[Vietnam], Hoa Binh (Yen Thuy), 20°23'N, 105°36'E, fruit orchard, MT, 20–30.v.2002, K.D. Long, Mic. 243” (IEBR).
Materials examined.
1♀, Mt. Nanling (112°59'09"E, 24°53'46"N ~ 113°05'28"E, 24°56'42"N), Ruyuan, Guangdong, 2003. VII. 23, Xu Zaifu, No. 20049062; 1♀, Shiwandashan Forest Park(107°53'E, 21°53'N ~ 107°55'E, 24°55'N, 310m), Guangxi, 2001. XI. 29, Ma Yun, No. 20021580.
Distribution.
China (Guangdong, Guangxi), Vietnam. New record for China.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to Dr. Arkadiy S. Lelej of Institute of Biology & Soil Science, Russian Academy Sciences for his kind help during the research. Funding for this study was provided by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (30625006), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30970384, 31021003), and the National Special Basic Research Funds (2006FY120100, 2006FY110500-3).
References
- Ahmad Z, Pandey K, Haider AA, Shuja-Uddin (2005) Discovery of the genus Wilkinsonellus Mason (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from India. Zoos’ Print Journal 20(3): 1804. [Google Scholar]
- Austin AD, Dangerfield PC. (1992) Synopsis of Australasian Microgastrinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), with a key to genera and description of new taxa. Invertebrate Taxonomy 6 (1): 1-76. 10.1071/IT9920001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J, Song D. (2004) Systematic studies on Microgastrinae of China (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) (in Chinese with English summary). Fujian Scientific Publisher, Fuzhou, 354 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Chou LY. (1999) New records of six braconids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from Taiwan. Journal of Agricultural Research of China 48 (1): 64-66. [Google Scholar]
- De Saeger H. (1944) Microgasterinae (Hymenoptera: Apocrita). Exploration du Parc National Albert, Mission G.F. de Witte 47: 1-342. [Google Scholar]
- Gates MW, Heraty JM, Schauff ME, Wagner DL, Whitfield JB, Wahl DB. (2002) Survey of the parasitic Hymenoptera on leafminers in California. Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 11 (2): 213-270. [Google Scholar]
- Long KD, van Achterberg C. (2003) Two new species of the genus Wilkinsonellus Mason (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae) from northern Vietnam. Zoologische Mededelingen Leiden 77 (10): 221-227. [Google Scholar]
- Lyle GT. (1925) Some Braconidae new to Britain. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 61: 119-123. [Google Scholar]
- Marczak P, Buszko J. (1994) Braconid wasps (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from mining Lepidoptera. Wiadomosci Entomologiczne 12 (4): 259-272. [Google Scholar]
- Marsh PM, Shaw SR, Wharton RA. (1987) An identification manual for the North American genera of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Washington 13, 98 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Nixon GEJ. (1965) A reclassification of the tribe Microgasterini (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology series, Supplement 2: 1-284. [Google Scholar]
- Nixon GEJ. (1976) A revision of the north-western European species of the merula, laeteus, vipio, ultor, ater, butalidis, popularis, carbonarius and validus-groups of Apanteles Förster (Hym.: Braconidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 65: 687-732. 10.1017/S0007485300006386 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Papp J. (1983a) Contributions to the braconid fauna of Hungary, IV. Microgastrinae. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Folia Entomologica Hungarica 44: 125-138. [Google Scholar]
- Papp J. (1983b) A survey of the European species of Apanteles Först. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae: Microgastrinae), VII. The carbonarius-, circumscriptus-, fraternus-, pallipes-, parasitellae-, vitripennis-, liparidis-, octonarius- and thompsoni- group. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 75: 247-283. [Google Scholar]
- Papp J. (1990) Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from Korea. XII. Acta Zoologica Hungarica 36(1/2): 87–119. [Google Scholar]
- Telenga NA. (1955) Braconidae, subfamily Microgasterinae, subfamily Agathinae. Fauna USSR, Hymenoptera 5(4), 311 pp. [Translation (1964) Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem, 295 pp.] [Google Scholar]
- Tobias VI. (1971) Review of the Braconidae (Hymenoptera) of the U.S.S.R. (in Russian). Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Entomologicheskogo Obshchestva 54: 156–268. [Translation (1975) Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 164 pp.] [Google Scholar]
- Tobias VI. (1976) Braconids of the Caucasus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Opredelitel Faune SSSR 110, Nauka Press, Leningrad, 286 pp. [in Russian] [Google Scholar]
- Tobias VI. (1986) Acaeliinae, Cardiochilinae, Microgastrinae, Miracinae. In: Medvedev GS. (Eds). Opredelitel Nasekomych Evrospeiskoi Tsasti SSSR 3, Peredpontdatokrylye 4. Opr. Faune SSSR. ’ 145: 336–501.[Keys to the insects of the European part of USSR. Hymenoptera]3020640
- van Achterberg C. (1979) A revision of the subfamily Zelinae auct. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 122: 241-479. [Google Scholar]
- Whitfield JB. (1985) The Nearctic species of Deuterixys Mason (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 61 (1): 60-67. [Google Scholar]
- Whitfield JB, Wagner DL. (1991) Annotated key to the genera of Braconidae (Hymenoptera) attacking leafmining Lepidoptera in the Holarctic region. Journal of Natural History 25: 733-754. 10.1080/00222939100770481 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson DS. (1936) A list of Lepidoptera from which parasites are particularly desired. Entomologist 69: 81-84. [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson DS. (1940) On the identity of Apanteles carbonarius Wesmael, with the description of a new, closely-related, palaearctic species (Hym. Brac.). Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London (B), 9 (9): 157-164. 10.1111/j.1365-3113.1940.tb00370.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu DS, van Achterberg C, Horstmann K. (2005) World Ichneumonoidea 2004. Taxonomy, Biology, Morphology and Distribution. CD/DVD. Taxapad, Vancouver: www.taxapad.com [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.