. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 13.

Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2011 Jul;25(4):520–534. doi: 10.1037/a0022550

Table 3.

Significant Analysis of Variance Results: Group Differences in the Degree and Latency of Regional Activity

	Degree of activity
Effect	ROI	Latency window
Hem × Time × Group	SMG, F(13, 1274) = 3.50, p < .0001	350–650 ms
NI > RD	(LH), F(1, 98) = 5.86, p < .01
Time × Group	STS, F(13, 1274) = 1.99, p < .01	450–650 ms
NI > RD	(LH/RH) (p < .04)
Time × Group	STG, F(13, 1274) = 2.04, p < .01	350–550 ms
NI > RD	(LH/RH) (p < .04)
Peak latency
NI > RD	IFG (LH), F(l, 98) = 5.39, p < .02
NI > RD	STG (LH), F(l, 98) = 5.89, p < .02
NI > ADHD	IFG (RH), F(1, 68) = 5.83, p < .01
NI > ADHD	Fusiform (RH), F(1, 68) = 5.16, p < .02
NI < ADHD	LOC (LH), F(1, 68) = 7.02, p < .01

Note. Results were restricted to the pseudoword task. ROI = Region of Interest; SMG = supramarginal gyrus; NI = nonreading impaired; RD = reading difficulties; STS = superior temporal sulcus; STG = superior tempored gyrus; IFG = inferior frontal gyrus; ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; LOC = ; LH = left hemisphere (Hem); RH = right hemisphere.