Abstract
Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) is commonly used to grow polymer brushes from Au surfaces, but the resulting film thicknesses are usually significantly less than with ATRP from SiO2 substrates. On Au, growth of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blocks from poly(tert-butyl acrylate) brushes occurs more rapidly than growth of PMMA from initiator monolayers, suggesting that the disparity between growth rates from Au and SiO2 stems from the Au surface. Radical quenching by electron transfer from Au is probably not the termination mechanism because polymerization from thin, cross-linked initiators gives film thicknesses that are essentially the same as the thicknesses of films grown from SiO2 under the same polymerization conditions. However, this result is consistent with termination through desorption of thiols from non-cross-linked films, and reaction of these thiols with growing polymer chains. The enhanced stability of cross-linked initiators allows ATRP at temperatures up to ~100 °C and enables the growth of thick films of PMMA (350 nm), polystyrene (120 nm) and poly(vinyl pyridine) (200 nm) from Au surfaces in 1 hour. At temperatures >100 °C, the polymer brush layers delaminate as large area films.
Keywords: polymer brush, ATRP, surface initiated polymerization
Introduction
Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) on Au serve as a prototype surface since they provide closely packed, well-ordered and reasonably stable films. Au substrates are ideal since they are chemically homogeneous, virtually free of contamination, easy to clean, and compatible with a wide variety of analytical techniques for thin film characterization. Elaboration of SAMs with polymers can occur when the self-assembling thiols contain initiating groups at their termini. Although surface-initiated radical polymerization takes place on a broad range of substrates, most studies have focused on Au and silica substrates. 1–9
Nevertheless, the Au-S bond that links initiator-containing SAMs to the surface is labile above 60 °C,10–15 so Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and other polymerizations from Au typically occur at <60 °C. However, at such low temperatures important monomers such as styrene and 4-vinyl pyridine have low radical propagation rates, which limit their growth. Moreover, even at temperatures <60 °C, polymerization is slower from SAMS on Au than from monolayers on SiO2-coated substrates.16 Several factors may lead to different polymerization rates from monolayers on Au and silica. For example, the number and density of sites available for immobilizing initiators on Au and SiO2 surfaces are different. Studies of silica surfaces provide a limiting area/chain of 0.6 nm2,17 with typical values of ~0.65 nm2 or ~1.54 chains/nm2. This is roughly 40% of the density for a SAM on Au, and the higher initiator density on Au surfaces may lead to greater termination of growing chains. Additionally, gold is a transition metal capable of quenching radicals,18–20 which could reduce the number of growing chains to give reduced growth rates and thin films.
Huang et al.12 investigated polymerization of styrene from azo-initiators immobilized on flat Au substrates, and concluded that the instability of alkanethiol monolayers limits free-radical polymerization. They suggested that solvent-phase free radicals accelerate thiol desorption from Au, and desorbed alkanethiols appear to be efficient chain-transfer reagents that terminate brush growth. A simple cross-linking procedure, however, can stabilize the SAM to enable thermal radical polymerization from Au. In other strategies to stabilize Au-supported polymers at elevated temperatures, Roux et al.21 coated gold electrodes with a carboxylic acid-functionalized polypyrrole to restrict thiol desorption, and Matyjaszewski et al.13 formed a cross-linked polymer shell to prevent dissociation of linear brushes from gold nanoparticles.
This report explores factors that may be responsible for retarding film growth rates in ATRP from gold: 1) differences in the initiator densities for gold and silica substrates, 2) radical quenching by the gold surface and 3) termination, resulting from desorption of thiols from SAMs on gold surfaces. We find that the latter is most important, and that the use of cross-linked thiol initiators prevents thiol desorption from Au, and enables polymer growth rates comparable to those from SiO2 substrates. In addition, cross-linked thiol initiators extend surface-initiated polymerizations from Au to temperatures >100 °C, well above the normal 60 °C stability limit for SAMs on Au. The enhanced initiator stability enables the growth of thick films of poly(methyl methacrylate (350 nm), polystyrene (120 nm) and poly(vinyl pyridine) (200 nm) from Au surfaces in 1 hour.
Experimental Section
Materials
Unless otherwise noted, all chemicals were obtained from Aldrich and stored under nitrogen. 11-Mercapto-1-undecanol (MUD, 97%), 2-bromo-2-methylpropionyl bromide (97%), 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPS), anisole (99.7%), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.8%), Cu(I)Br (99.999%), Cu(II)Br2 (99.999%), Me4Cyclam (99%), and 4,4′-dinonyl-2,2′-bipyridine (dnNbpy, 97%) were used as received. (3-Aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane was distilled under vacuum prior to use. Triethylamine was distilled from calcium hydride under a nitrogen atmosphere, and stored under nitrogen. tert-Butyl acrylate (tBA, 98%), methyl methacrylate (MMA, 99%) and styrene (99%) were passed through a 10 cm-long, 0.5-cm diameter column of activated basic alumina and then distilled from calcium hydride to remove inhibitors. The disulfide initiator, 11-[(2-bromo-2-methyl)propionyloxy]undecyldisulfide,22 and the trimethoxysilane initiator, 2-bromo-2-methyl-N-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)propionamide, were synthesized using slightly modified versions of literature procedures.23,24 All silane compounds were used and stored under nitrogen. Toluene was distilled from sodium/potassium alloy under nitrogen, using benzophenone as an indicator. After purification, the monomers, liquid chemicals and solvents were transferred to Schlenk flasks, degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles, and then transferred into a drybox. Au-coated silicon wafers were prepared by electron-beam evaporation of 200 nm of Au on 20 nm of Cr on Si (100) wafers. Silicon and Au-coated wafers and were cleaned in a UV/O3 chamber for 30 min prior to use.
Characterization Methods
Ellipsometric measurements were obtained with a rotating analyzer spectroscopic ellipsometer (model M-44, J. A. Woollam) using WVASE32 software. The angle of incidence was 75° for all experiments, and a refractive index of 1.50 was used when calculating film thicknesses. Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared (reflectance FTIR) spectra were obtained from a Nicolet Magna-560 FTIR spectrometer with a MCT detector and a PIKE grazing angle (80°) attachment. Typically, 128 scans were collected for each spectrum. Thermally induced morphology changes of films grown from Au substrates were observed using a Keyence Digital Microscope equipped with a video camera.
Preparation of immobilized initiators on gold and silicon substrates
Gold-coated wafers, cleaned for 30 min in UV/O3, were washed with water and ethanol, and then transferred into a glove bag purged with N2. The wafers were immersed in a 1 mM ethanolic solution of the disulfide initiator, (Br-C(CH3)2-COO(CH2)11S)2, for 24 h to form a self-assembled initiator monolayer, and then the films were washed with ethanol and dried under a stream of N2. Cross-linked initiator monolayers were formed in a N2-purged glove bag, by immersing Au-coated substrates in a vial containing a 2 mM methanolic solution of MPS for 12 h at room temperature. After deposition, the substrates were rinsed three times with 2 mL of methanol and dried with a stream of nitrogen. The attached silane monolayer was then hydrolyzed at room temperature with 0.1 M HCl for 15 h to afford a cross-linked-hydroxylated surface. The modified Au substrates were treated with a 10 mM solution of the trimethoxysilane initiator, 2-bromo-2-methyl-N-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)propionamide, in toluene at 55 °C for 12 h. Following the deposition, the substrates were rinsed repeatedly with toluene and isopropanol, and then dried in a stream of nitrogen. The typical ellipsometric thickness of the cross-linked initiator layer on gold was 1.0–1.5 nm.
The trimethoxysilane initiator was immobilized on UV/O3-cleaned silicon wafers by immersing substrates in a 10 mM solution of 2-bromo-2-methyl-N-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)propionamide in toluene at 55 °C under nitrogen. After 12 h, the wafers were rinsed repeatedly with toluene and isopropanol, sonicated in toluene for 1 min and dried in a stream of nitrogen. The ellipsometric thickness of the crosslinked initiator layer on silicon surfaces was 1.0–1.5 nm.
Surface initiated polymerization. In a N2-purged dry box, CuBr (5.7 mg, 0.040 mmol), CuBr2 (4.5 mg, 0.020 mmol), Me4Cyclam (10.3 mg, 0.040 mmol) and dnNbpy (16.4 mg, 0.040 mmol) were added to a round-bottom flask containing 20 mL of a degassed solution of monomer in DMF/anisole (monomer/DMF/anisole ) 2:1:1 v:v:v, [monomer] ~4.0 M). The mixture was heated with an oil bath to 50 °C and stirred until it formed a transparent light green solution. The solution was transferred into a vial containing an initiator-modified substrate, Au or SiO2, to start the surface-initiated polymerization. After a predetermined reaction time at 50 °C, the substrate was removed from the vial, washed with ethyl acetate and THF sequentially, and then dried under a stream of N2.
Results and discussion
Surface initiated polymerization from gold and SiO2 substrates
Bao et al. reported that “identical” polymerizations of MMA from initiators on Au and SiO2 gave different polymer film thicknesses, and that PMMA films grown from SiO2 are systematically thicker than those grown from Au substrates.16 To confirm this observation, we polymerized MMA and styrene under identical conditions from initiators anchored on Au and SiO2 surfaces (Scheme 1), and compared the evolution of the film thickness with time. As Figures 1 and 2 show, irrespective of the monomer, ATRP from SiO2 provides thicker films and higher apparent growth rates than polymerization from Au surfaces under similar conditions. However, the shapes of the film thickness vs. time profiles are similar, suggesting that the primary difference between polymerization from gold and from silica is that there are fewer active chains when brushes grow from gold surfaces.
Scheme 1.
Surface-initiated polymerization of MMA from silicon and gold surfaces.
Figure 1.
Evolution of the ellipsometric brush thickness with time for the polymerization of MMA from ◇ gold and □ silicon surfaces at 50 °C. The data points are the average of two independent trials, and the limits of the error bars are the measured film thicknesses from the two runs.
Figure 2.

Evolution of the ellipsometric brush thickness with time for the polymerization of styrene from ◇ gold and □ silicon surfaces at 50 °C. The data points are the average of two independent trials, and the limits of the error bars are the measured film thicknesses from the two runs.
Block copolymer formation on Au and SiO2 substrates
If the difference between polymerization rates on Au and SiO2 substrates occurs due to a reaction or interaction at the substrate-film interface, such an effect might diminish as the films grow thicker. We tested this notion by placing the initiator at increasing distances from the Au surface simply by using ATRP to grow polymers from the surface, and then quenching the growing chain by adding a large excess of Cu(II)Br2. As Scheme 2 shows, the resulting Br-terminated chains can then initiate further polymerization.25 To that end, we grew poly(tert-butyl acrylate) (PtBA) brushes from initiators anchored to Au surfaces and quenched the growing chains at various times. After washing to remove excess monomer, we dried the substrate under a stream of N2, removed it from the dry box, and characterized the film by ellipsometry and FTIR spectroscopy. We then returned the substrates to the drybox and initiated polymerization of MMA for 1 hour from the dormant PtBA chains. The same process on SiO2 substrates served as a control.
Scheme 2.
Block copolymer formation on Au and SiO2 surfaces.
Figure 3 shows FTIR spectra of a 97 nm PtBA film and the PtBA-block-PMMA copolymer that resulted from growing 210 nm of PMMA from the initial PtBA film. Upon addition of the PMMA block the intensity of the ester carbonyl increased 2-fold, and the relative intensity of the t-butyl doublet (1365, 1375 cm−1) decreased compared to the CH2 and CH3 deformation bands at ~1440 – 1460 cm−1).
Figure 3.
Reflectance FTIR spectra of (a) a 100 nm PtBA film grown from an initiator layer on a gold substrate and (b) a PtBA-block-PMMA copolymer brush, synthesized by growing 210 nm of PMMA from the 100 nm PtBA film.
The ellipsometric data in Figure 4 show that PtBA brushes grew to ~200 nm thick films in 1 h from Au substrates and ~400 nm from SiO2. Remarkably, when thickness data from Au substrates are doubled and re-plotted (open squares), the data from SiO2 and Au substrates nearly coincide. From this analysis, we conclude that under comparable conditions, the number of chains growing from Au surfaces is half of those growing from SiO2, but both have comparable termination rates. Figure 4 also argues that lower growth rates on Au surfaces stem from termination events in close proximity of the Au surface, presumably by radical quenching through electron transfer, or by the loss of growing chains via desorption of thiols from Au surfaces. Desorbed thiols may act as a chain transfer agent, and for polymer brush syntheses, chain transfer is equivalent to termination. Alternatively, polymers anchored through Au-S bonds may be mechanically unstable, especially for highly solvated polymers of high molecular weight.26
Figure 4.
Formation of PtBA from SiO2 and gold surfaces; ◆thickness of PtBA brushes grown from thiol initiators anchored on gold as a function of time; ▲ thickness of PtBA brushes grown from initiators anchored on SiO2 substrates as a function of time; □ 2 × the thickness of PtBA brushes grown from thiol initiators anchored on gold.
MMA polymerizations were initiated from PtBA brushes that had been grown for 1 to 60 minutes. The added PMMA layers are ~2 times thicker than PMMA films grown for 1 h directly from gold surfaces, but comparable in thickness to PMMA blocks grown directly from SiO2 in 1 h (see Figure 1). The resulting ~200–300 nm PMMA layers were similar for both substrates, initially increasing in thickness, but decreasing in thicknesses for longer PtBA polymerization times. This trend likely reflects fewer dormant PtBA chains available to form the PtBA-block-PMMA copolymer due to termination during the growth of PtBA brushes. These results suggest that a significant fraction of the growing chains are active after polymerization of the initial PtBA block, and confirm that being in close proximity to the Au surface reduces the rate of film growth from immobilized initiators.
Polymerization from a cross-linked initiator
The previous data cannot distinguish whether radical quenching or thiol desorption cause decreased film growth on Au compared to SiO2. However, preventing desorption of thiols from the Au surface would test the validity of the thiol desorption mechanism. To that end, we formed cross-linked ATRP initiators on gold by an analogous method to that of Huang et al.,12 and compared polymerizations from these initiators with corresponding polymerization from standard thiol initiators. Scheme 3 depicts the formation of the cross-linked initiator. During hydrolysis, the trimethoxysilane groups of the MPS monolayer condense to form a dense poly(siloxane) network, which provides lateral stabilization through inter-chain cross-linking and generates a hydroxylated surface for the subsequent attachment of the trimethoxysilane-ATRP initiator. The cross-linked and standard thiol initiator (Scheme 1, top left) layers have comparable ellipsometric thicknesses, and therefore, radical quenching by the gold surface should be similar for both layers.
Scheme 3.
Formation of cross linked initiators on gold surfaces
FTIR spectroscopy and ellipsometry verify the attachment of the ATRP initiator to MPS. The sreflectance FTIR spectrum of the MPS layer on Au (not shown here) shows vibrational bands characteristic of MPS (2938 cm−1 for overlapping CH3 and CH2 bands, 2846 cm−1 for CH2 symmetric stretching, and 1114 cm−1 for Si-O-C stretching). After hydrolysis, the methyl peaks disappeared and the peak at 1114 cm−1 greatly decreased, indicating nearly complete hydrolysis of the trimethoxysilanes. The 1.0 nm ellipsometric thickness of the hydrolyzed MPS and the IR spectra agree well with literature data.12,27–29 After subsequent reaction with the trimethoxysilane initiator, the film thickness increased to 2.2 nm and amide peaks (1652 and 1548 cm−1) appear in the reflectance FTIR spectrum, confirming successful attachment of the ATRP-initiator.
Figures 6 and 7 show the evolution of ellipsometric film thickness with polymerization time for the surface-initiated polymerization of MMA and styrene from gold surfaces (both standard and cross-linked initiators) and SiO2. For both MMA and styrene, the film growth rates from cross-linked initiators on Au were essentially identical to those of films grown from silane initiators on SiO2 and 2–3 times the growth rate from non-cross-linked thiol initiators on Au surfaces. Additionally, increases in the characteristic IR peaks of the respective polymers are consistent with the ellipsometry data (see supporting information, Figures S1 and S2). Therefore, stabilizing the initiator layer via cross-linking efficiently restricts thiol desorption, and there is no evidence for radical quenching by gold.
Figure 6.
Surface initiated polymerization of MMA from gold and SiO2 surfaces. ◇ PMMA grown from a standard (non-cross-linked) initiator on gold; ◆ PMMA grown from a cross-linked thiol initiator; □ PMMA grown from a silane initiator layer on SiO2. The points are the average of data from three independent runs, and the limits of the error bars are the measured film thicknesses from the three runs.
Figure 7.
Surface initiated polymerization of styrene from gold and SiO2 surfaces. ◇ Polystyrene grown from a normal thiol initiator on gold ◆ Polystyrene grown from a cross-linked thio initiator □ Polystyrene grown from SiO2. The points are the average from three independent runs, and the limits of the error bars are the measured film thicknesses from the three runs.
To explore the thermal stability of the cross-linked thiol initiator, we polymerized MMA at temperatures ranging from 35 to 115 °C using standard initiators on Au and SiO2 surfaces. The data (Figure 8), which show that thinner films form on Au substrates at all temperatures, suggest that thiol desorption is important even at low temperatures. Increases in polymerization rates at higher temperatures may offset the accompanying increases in thiol desorption and chain transfer to give a film thickness that is relatively independent of polymerization temperature. In contrast, polymerizations using the cross-linked initiator were identical to polymerization on SiO2. Furthermore, the use of the cross-linked initiator enabled the polymerization of MMA from Au surfaces at temperatures up to ~100 °C, providing 300 nm films in 1hr.
Figure 8.
Temperature-dependent surface-initiated polymerization of MMA from various initiators; ◇ PMMA grown from standard thioinitiators (Scheme 1) anchored to Au surfaces; ◆ PMMA grown from the crosslinked thioinitiator shown in Scheme 2; and □ PMMA grown from SiO2 as shown in Scheme 3. Each data point indicates the film thickness after 1 hour of growth. The points are the average of data from two independent trials, and the limits of the error bars are the measured film thicknesses from the two runs. All polymerization times were 1 hour.
Polymerization of styrene gives similar results, except the thickness of films grown from the thioinitiator initially showed some increase with temperature (Figure 9). The rate constant for styrene polymerization likely increases faster with temperature than the corresponding rate constant for MMA. The apparent temperature limit for growth from Au surfaces is ~110 °C. Above 90°C, film thickness begins to decline even on SiO2 substrates. Inspection of a polystyrene film grown at 115 °C showed large-scale delamination of the polymer films (Figure 10), which is absent in films grown at 90 °C. Kim et al. made similar observations for poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) brushes grown on Au.30
Figure 9.
Temperature-dependent surface-initiated polymerization of styrene from various initiators; ◇ polystyrene grown from standard thioinitiators (Scheme 1) anchored to Au surfaces; ◆ polystyrene grown from the crosslinked thioinitiator shown in Scheme 3; and □ polystyrene grown from SiO2 as shown in Scheme 3. Each data point indicates the film thickness after 1 hour of growth. The points are the average of data from two independent runs, and the limits of the error bars are the measured film thicknesses from the two runs. All polymerization times were 1 hour.
Figure 10.

Optical micrograph of a 70 nm-thick polystyrene brush, showing delamination of the polymer film from the substrate. The film was grown for 1 hour at 115 °C from crosslinked initiators immobilized on Au.
The improved polymer film growth from Au provided by cross-linked initiators can be generalized to other monomers such as poly(vinyl pyridine) (PVP). Despite its potential utility as a polyelectrolyte brush, we are unaware of examples of thick PVP brushes grown from Au surfaces (20 nm in 2 hours by Bao et al.31 and 6 nm in 5 hours by Husson et al.32). However, since Rühe33 grew 430 nm thick PVP films from surface-anchored azo initiators on SiO2 in 14 hours, growing PVP from the cross-linked initiator should provide films on Au with thicknesses that approach those of Rühe. As Figure 9 shows, polymerization of vinyl pyridine for 8 hours at 50 °C provided 200 nm films from both Au and SiO2 surfaces. This thickness is approximately 10 times the thickness of previous examples on Au. The increase in IR intensities (see supporting information, Figure S3), is consistent with the ellipsometric data.
Our experiments using cross-linked initiators indicate thiol desorption as the main limitation to growing thick polymer brushes on Au. However, the precise desorption mechanisms are unknown. Scheme 4 depicts some pathways that may lead to termination of surface-bound radicals on Au surfaces. Thiol desorption, especially at > 60 °C, is probably important. Radical-induced desorption of thiol SAMs from growing chains can be important over a broad temperature range, and the copper catalyst also may contribute to thiol desorption. While modifying polymers grown on Au using “click chemistry”, the Cu-catalyzed cycloaddition of azides with alkynes, we observed decreases in film thickness at high Cu concentrations and long reaction times, suggesting desorption of polymer brushes from Au substrates.34 Although the copper concentration in ATRP is relatively low, its effect may not be negligible since partial desorption of initiator-containing monolayers from the Au surface would result in a decrease in surface initiator concentration.
Scheme 4.
Proposed pathways for terminating surface-bound radicals on Au. Thermal- or radical-induced desorption of surface thiols or thiol radicals terminate growing chains by radical coupling or by chain-transfer, which is equivalent to termination for brushes.
Conclusions
At temperatures ranging from 23 to 100 °C, radical polymerizations initiated from Au surfaces generally provide thinner polymer brushes than comparable polymerizations initiated from SiO2 . A crosslinked poly(siloxane) primer layer on gold surfaces eliminates this disparity. These results implicate thiols in terminating growing polymer brushes to give polymer chains with low molecular weights and low film thicknesses. These results also exclude radical quenching by gold or the difference in initiator density between gold and silicon as significant factors. Crosslinked initiators extend the temperature range for polymerizations initiated from Au to 100 °C, enabling rapid polymerization of monomers less active than methacrylates, e.g. styrene and vinyl pyridine. Above 100 °C, we observed macroscopic delamination of polymer films grown on Au.
Supplementary Material
Figure 5.
Formation of PtBA-block-PMMA films on Au and SiO2 surfaces; ◇ Net growth of PMMA from PtBA (Au surface); △ Net growth of PMMA from PtBA (SiO2 surface). The polymerization time for the PMMA block was 1 hour for all samples.
Figure 11.
Evolution of film thickness with time during surface-initiated polymerization of vinyl pyridine from various initiators at 50 °C; ◇ poly(vinyl pyridine) grown from a non-crosslinked thioinitiator on gold; ◆ poly(vinyl pyridine) grown from a crosslinked thioinitiator on gold; □ poly(vinyl pyridine) grown from a SiO2 surface
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the generous support of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (GM080511).
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available. IR data for polymers grown from surfaces (Figures S1– S3). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Contributor Information
Sampa Saha, Email: sampa_iit@yahoo.com.
Merlin L. Bruening, Email: bruening@chemistry.msu.edu.
Gregory L. Baker, Email: bakerg@msu.edu.
References
- 1.Milner ST. Science. 1991;251:905–14. doi: 10.1126/science.251.4996.905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Huang X, Doneski LJ, Wirth MJ. Analytical Chemistry. 1998;70:4023–4029. doi: 10.1021/ac980231c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bruening ML, Zhou Y, Aguilar G, Agee R, Bergbreiter DE, Crooks RM. Langmuir. 1997;13:770–778. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sidorenko A, Minko S, Schenk-Meuser K, Duschner H, Stamm M. Langmuir. 1999;15:8349–8355. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prucker O, Naumann CA, Ruhe J, Knoll W, Frank CW. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:8766–8770. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Edmondson S, Osborne VL, Huck WTS. Chem Soc Rev. 2004;33:14–22. doi: 10.1039/b210143m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li DX, He Q, Cui Y, Wang KW, Zhang XM, Li JB. Chem-Eur J. 2007;13:2224–2229. doi: 10.1002/chem.200600839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li DX, He Q, Cui Y, Li JB. Chem Mater. 2007;19:412–417. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li DX, Cui Y, Wang KW, He Q, Yan XH, Li JB. Adv Funct Mater. 2007;17:3134–3140. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ulman A. Chem Rev. 1996;96:1533–1554. doi: 10.1021/cr9502357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schlenoff JB, Li M, Ly H. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:12528–36. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huang WX, Skanth G, Baker GL, Bruening ML. Langmuir. 2001;17:1731–1736. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dong HC, Zhu MZ, Yoon JA, Gao HF, Jin RC, Matyjaszewski K. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12852. doi: 10.1021/ja8038097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shan J, Nuopponen M, Jiang H, Kauppinen E, Tenhu H. Macromolecules. 2003;36:4526–4533. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fan XW, Xia CJ, Fulghum T, Park MK, Locklin J, Advincula RC. Langmuir. 2003;19:916–923. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bao ZY, Bruening ML, Baker GL. Macromolecules. 2006;39:5251–5258. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sander LC, Wise SA. Journal of Chromatography. 1984;316:163–181. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Henglein A, Lilie J. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103:1059–1066. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ganesh V, Lakshminarayanan V. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:16372–16381. doi: 10.1021/jp052489u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Imahori H, Norieda H, Nishimura Y, Yamazaki I, Higuchi K, Kato N, Motohiro T, Yamada H, Tamaki K, Arimura M, Sakata Y. J Phys Chem B. 2000;104:1253–1260. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Roux S, Duwez AS, Demoustier-Champagne S. Langmuir. 2003;19:306–313. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shah RR, Merreceyes D, Husemann M, Rees I, Abbott NL, Hawker CJ, Hedrick JL. Macromolecules. 2000;33:597–605. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yoon KR, Chi YS, Lee KB, Lee JK, Kim DJ, Koh YJ, Joo SW, Yun WS, Choi IS. J Mater Chem. 2003;13:2910–2914. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mulvihill MJ, Rupert BL, He RR, Hochbaum A, Arnold J, Yang PD. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:16040–16041. doi: 10.1021/ja056242m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kim JB, Huang WX, Miller MD, Baker GL, Bruening ML. J Polym Sci Pol Chem. 2003;41:386–394. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang YX, He JA, Zhu Y, Chen H, Ma HW. Chem Commun. 2011;47:1190–1192. doi: 10.1039/c0cc04291a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yan YG, Bein T. J Phys Chem. 1992;96:9387–9393. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mihailova B, Engstrom V, Hedlund J, Holmgren A, Sterte J. J Mater Chem. 1999;9:1507–1510. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mintova S, Schoeman B, Valtchev V, Sterte J, Mo SY, Bein T. Adv Mater. 1997;9:585. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim JBHWX, Wang CL, Bruening ML, Baker GL. In: Polymer Brushes. Advincula RCBWJ, Caster KC, Rühe J, editors. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2004. pp. 105–117. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bao ZY, Bruening ML, Baker GL. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:9056–9060. doi: 10.1021/ja058743d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li X, Wei XL, Husson SM. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:869–876. doi: 10.1021/bm034266k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Biesalski M, Ruhe J. Langmuir. 2000;16:1943–1950. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Saha S. PhD Thesis. Michigan State University; East Lansing, MI: 2010. Surface Initiated ATRP of Substituted Styrenes and Functional Monomers on Flat Surfaces. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.













