Abstract
Although the prevalence of overactive bladder (OAB) is similar in both male and female populations, females have a greater tendency to seek medical advice regarding their symptoms. A review of the evidence of therapy among women shows that a variety of modalities has been shown to be effective for symptom improvement in women with OAB. Bladder retraining/re-education should be considered for all women with OAB. With respect to first-line pharmacotherapy with antimuscarinic agents, the development of extended release preparations, bladder selective M3 antagonists and alternative routes of delivery, have improved compliance and persistence. Other pharmacotherapeutic options with potential for providing benefit include antidepressants, vasopressin analogues, alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists and beta-adrenoceptor agonists. There are also a number of newer agents currently being investigated, including calcium channel blocking agents, potassium channel opening drugs, beta agonists and neurokinin receptor antagonists. Intravesical injections of botulinum toxin may be an alternative, while surgery can be considered for truly intractable cases.
Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common, troublesome and often under diagnosed condition that significantly affects quality of life. Studies have suggested that there could be 17.5 million women in the United States who suffer from the condition.1 The prevalence of OAB is similar in both male and female populations and increases with age.2 Females, however, have a greater tendency to seek advice regarding their symptoms.
The following review will present the various treatment options available to women with OAB and provide key highlights from the evidence base for those treatments. Therapy ranges from conservative measures such as bladder retraining through medication and, occasionally, reconstructive surgery.
Conservative measures
Lifestyle advice
Lifestyle advice is important for all OAB sufferers. Decreasing fluid intake by 25% has been shown to be associated with significant reductions in urgency, frequency and nocturia, while increasing fluid intake worsened frequency.3
Reducing caffeine intake is another lifestyle intervention that can be helpful. High caffeine intake is an independent risk factor for detrusor overactivity, and the relationship may be dose dependent.4 With respect to the specific types of drinks consumed, tea drinking (but not coffee) has been epidemiologically associated with all forms of incontinence.5 Diet soft drinks have also been found to be associated with a higher rate of urgency and frequency than regular soft drinks or carbonated water.6
Weight loss has also been found to decrease incontinence in moderately and morbidly obese women.7
Bladder retraining
Bladder retraining should be considered for all women with OAB. Pelvic floor muscle training may be effective in those with mixed or urgency incontinence.7 Bladder reeducation may include biofeedback and bladder drill. In a retrospective observational study of 114 women undergoing inpatient bladder retraining, the investigators found that bladder retraining was associated with a statistically significant decrease in frequency of incontinence episodes and nocturia.8 Furthermore, there was also an increase in the interval between voids. Twenty-three percent were cured of their symptoms, 36% reported improvement and 27% did not find any change (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Impact of bladder training: retrospective study.
Pharmacotherapy
A wide variety of pharmacologic therapy is employed in OAB. Most of the drugs have an antimuscarinic effect, but antidepressants, vasopressin analogues and alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists, beta-adrenoceptor agonists are also used.
Antimuscarinics
These are the most commonly used agents for OAB. They work by reducing intravesical pressure, increasing compliance, raising the volume threshold for micturition and reducing uninhibited detrusor contractions.9
For many years, the antimuscarinics (oxybutynin, tolterodine, propiverine and trospium) were available only in immediate-release formulations. The major shortcoming of all these drugs was a high burden of antimuscarinic side effects (e.g., dry mouth, constipation). These side effects, coupled with insufficient efficacy, led to a very low rate of persistence with these medications in the longer term.10
With the subsequent development and use of sustained-release formulations, persistence rates improved somewhat, but were still far from optimal. In a study examining persistence to extended-release agents (oxybutynin or tolterodine), only 44% of those taking a long-acting agent remained adherent past 30 days.11 Other methods that can be used in an effort to improve persistence are the use of more selective M3 antagonists (e.g., solifenacin, darifenacin, fesoterodine) and alternative routes of delivery of oxybutynin (e.g., patch, gel, intravaginal ring).
Choosing a particular antimuscarinic for the treatment of OAB in women involves attempting to determine the best match of agent characteristics with those of the patient. The key advantages and disadvantages of each antimuscarinic agent are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Advantages and disadvantages of antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder
| Antimuscarinic | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Oxybutynin IR | Flexible dosing, rapid onset of action, cheap | Persistence limited by dry mouth |
| Oxybutynin ER | Very flexible dosing | Cognitive impairment |
| Oxybutynin TDS | Placebo rate of systemic side effects | 15–20% rate of pruritis |
| Oxybutynin Gel | Lower skin reactions | Acceptability? |
| Tolterodine ER | Well tolerated | Single dose |
| Solifenacin | Superior efficacy to tolterodine ER | High rate of dry mouth at 10 mg |
| Darifenacin | Low rate of cognitive impairment | High rate of constipation |
| Trospium | Does not cross blood brain barrier | ER – Recently launched in the United Kingdom, single dose |
| Propiverine | Well tolerated | Efficacious only for frequency |
| Fesoterodine | Flexible dosing | High rate of dry mouth at 8 mg |
IR: immediate release; ER: extended release; TDS: transdermal system.
Desmopressin
Desmopressin has been used for many years for the treatment of nocturia and nocturnal enuresis in children12 and adults.13 There is also evidence of modest efficacy for the treatment of OAB. A proof-of-concept, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, cross-over study included 88 adult patients with OAB.14 The investigators reported that treatment with desmopressin 0.2 mg was associated with a significant reduction in the number of voids over eight hours (3.2 vs. 4.2; p < 0.001). There was also a significant increase in the time to first urgency episode and a decrease in the number of urgency episodes for desmopressin compared to placebo (p < 0.003).
The major side effect of concern with desmopressin is hyponatremia, although no episodes were recorded in the clinical trial in OAB.
Estrogens
The evidence for adding estrogen in combination with an antimuscarinic drug is equivocal. One study evaluating the combination of tolterodine and conjugated equine estrogen cream reported that the combination was associated with significant improvements in daytime frequency and voided volume (but not nocturia, urgency or urgency incontinence) compared to tolterodine alone.15
The investigators of another study, which evaluated tolterodine with or without oestriol cream, reported that there was no difference between arms in any of the efficacy endpoints.16 Subjects all had detrusor overactivity rather than just symptoms of OAB.
Antidepressants
Although these agents are sometimes used for the treatment of OAB, they are not approved for this indication, nor is there any clinical trial evidence supporting this use.
Future directions in pharmacotherapy
Newer agents in different classes are under evaluation including calcium channel blocking agents, potassium channel opening drugs, beta agonists and neurokinin receptor antagonists. Combination therapies including an antimuscarinic and an agent with a complementary mechanism of action, are also under investigation.
Other therapies
Approximately 10% of patients will continue to suffer from distressing lower urinary tract symptoms despite conservative measures and pharmacologic therapy. More invasive strategies can be considered for these patients.
Botulinum toxin
Evidence suggests that intravesical injections of botulinum toxin may offer an alternative, albeit temporary, measure in women with intractable detrusor overactivity.17–19 It should be noted that intermittent self-catheterization may be required in a minority (∼25%) of patients treated with botulinum toxin.
Neuromodulation
Both peripheral posterior tibial nerve stimulation20,21 and sacral neuromodulation22,23 are also alternative therapeutic options, although less cost effective than antimuscarinics.24
Surgery
A variety of surgical augmentation techniques have been developed, including clam cystoplasty but these should only be considered in women who have failed all other treatments.
Conclusions
For the management of OAB in women, conservative therapy is indicated as primary treatment. Antimuscarinic agents are the most commonly used drugs, but their effectiveness use is limited by tolerability and efficacy (and the correspondingly low rates of compliance and persistence). Newer bladder specific antimuscarinics may offer advantages. At the moment, other options for pharmacotherapy remain under development.
Neuromodulation and botulinum toxin may be useful in patients with intractable overactive bladder, while reconstructive surgery should only be considered in those women who have failed other treatments.
Footnotes
Competing interests: Dr. Linda Cardozo has during the last year received funding for research, lecturing and/or advice/consultancies from the following organizations: Astellas: member of Global advisory board for solifenacin, co-chairman of the European overactive bladder forum, principal investigator for the SUNRISE study, speaker at satellite symposia. Pfizer: Member of Global Advisory Board for Fesoterodine, participant in a multi-centre research study. Research consultancy and/or advisory work for Astellas, Pfizer, Ethicon, TEVA and Merck.
This paper has been peer-reviewed.
References
- 1.Stewart WF, Corey R, Herzog AR, et al. Prevalence of overactive bladder in women: results from the NOBLE program. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12(Suppl 3):S66. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Milsom I, Abrams P, Cardozo L, et al. How widespread are the symptoms of overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study. BJU Int. 2001;87:760–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hashim H, Abrams P. How should patients with an overactive bladder manipulate their fluid intake? BJU Int. 2008;102:62–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07463.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arya LA, Myers DL, Jackson ND. Dietary caffeine intake and the risk for detrusor instability: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:85–9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00808-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, et al. Are smoking and other lifestyle factors associated with female urinary incontinence? The Norwegian EPINCONT Study. BJOG. 2003;110:247–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cartwright R, Srikrishna S, Cardozo L, et al. Does Diet Coke cause overactive bladder? A 4-way crossover trial, investigating the effect of carbonated soft drinks on overactive bladder symptoms in normal volunteers [poster]. Presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society; Rotterdam. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. 4th International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris July 5–8, 2008. Paris: Health Publication Ltd; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Majumdar A, Hassan I, Saleh S, et al. Inpatient bladder retraining: is it beneficial on its own? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21:657–63. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1085-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abrams P, Andersson K-E. Muscarinic receptor antagonists for overactive bladder. Br J Urol Int. 2007;100:987–1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, et al. A medium-term analysis of the subjective efficacy of treatment for women with detrusor instability and low bladder compliance. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:988–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shaya FT, Blume S, Gu A, et al. Persistence with overactive bladder pharmacotherapy in a Medicaid population. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11(4 Suppl):S121–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nørgaard JP, Rittig S, Djurhuus JC. Nocturnal enuresis: an approach to treatment based on pathogenesis. J Pediatr. 1989;114(4 Pt 2):705–10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80885-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mattiasson A, Abrams P, Van Kerrebroeck P, et al. Efficacy of desmopressin in the treatment of nocturia: a double-blind placebo-controlled study in men. BJU Int. 2002;89:855–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hashim H, Malmberg L, Graugaard-Jensen C, et al. Desmopressin, as a “designer-drug,” in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28:40–6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tseng LH, Wang AC, Chang YL, et al. Randomized comparison of tolterodine with vaginal estrogen cream versus tolterodine alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with overactive bladder syndrome. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28:47–51. doi: 10.1002/nau.20583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, et al. Is there a synergistic effect of topical oestrogens when administered with antimuscarinics in the treatment of symptomatic detrusor overactivity? Eur Urol. 2009;55:713–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schurch B, de Sèze M, Denys P, et al. Botulinum toxin type a is a safe and effective treatment for neurogenic urinary incontinence: results of a single treatment, randomized, placebo controlled 6-month study. J Urol. 2005;174:196–200. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000162035.73977.1c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Karsenty G, Denys P, Amarenco G, et al. Botulinum toxin A (Botox) intradetrusor injections in adults with neurogenic detrusor overactivity/neurogenic overactive bladder: a systematic literature review. Eur Urol. 2008;53:275–87. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brubaker L, Richter HE, Visco A, et al. Refractory idiopathic urge urinary incontinence and Botulinum A injection. J Urol. 2008;180:217. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vandoninck V, Van Balken MR, Finazzi Agró E, et al. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of urge incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22:17–23. doi: 10.1002/nau.10036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Peters KM, Macdiarmid SA, Wooldridge LS, et al. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus extended-release tolterodine: results from the overactive bladder innovative therapy trial. J Urol. 2009;182:1055–61. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schmidt RA, Jonas U, Oleson KA, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. Sacral Nerve Stimulation Study Group. J Urol. 1999;162:352–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van Kerrebroeck PE, van Voskuilen AC, Heesakkers JP, et al. Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol. 2007;178:2029–34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Robinson D, Jacklin P, Cardozo L. Is cost the Achilles hell of posterior tibial nerve stimulation? A cost minimisation comparison with antimuscarinic therapy in the management of OAB [abstract]. Presented at the ICS Annual Meeting 2009. [Google Scholar]

