Abstract
Background
Due to their homology, close proximity and opposite orientation, RHD and RHCE can exchange nucleotides giving rise to variant alleles. Some of these variants encode the so-called partial phenotypes. The DIII partial D category has been subdivided into DIIIa, DIIIb, DIIIc, DIII type 4, DIII type 6, and DIII type 7. During DNA-based screening tests, we identified a second example of DIII type 7 in a Dce donor from South Africa. Our study describes hemagglutination tests on this sample and raises a question regarding the molecular basis of the originally defined DIIIb category.
Materials and methods
Hemagglutination and DNA testing were performed by standard techniques.
Results
RBCs from this DIII type 7 donor typed D+C−E−c+e+G−, DAK+ and did not react with anti-D made by people with the DIII phenotype. The allele is RHD*DIII 150C, 178C, 201A, 203A, 307C, 410T, 455C, 602G, 667G).
Conclusions
Based on the serotype and ethnicity (black African), it is likely that DIII type 7 is the originally defined DIIIb category.
Keywords: DIII phenotype, RHD allele, Rh blood group system, RHD variant, partial D phenotype
Introduction
The Rh blood group system is diverse in terms of both antigens and alleles.1 The genes, RHD and RHCE, encoding the Rh antigens are homologous and reside on chromosome 1 (1p36.11). Due to their homology as well as their close proximity and opposite orientation, these two genes sometimes exchange nucleotides thereby giving rise to variant alleles. The variant alleles encode variant proteins, some of which are the so-called partial D phenotypes. Numerous partial D phenotypes, which are usually identified when a D-positive person makes an alloanti-D, have been described.1,2
Based on serological tests and ethnicity, Tippett and Sanger subdivided the partial DIII phenotype into three categories. DIIIa and DIIIb phenotypes are found in people of African heritage in a Dce complex; DIIIa red blood cells (RBCs) are G+ whereas DIIIb RBCs are G−. The DIIIc phenotype is found in Caucasians in a DCe complex.3 When RH alleles were sequenced, further subdivisions of DIII occurred.1,2 RHD*DIII type 4 (ISBT provisional allele name RHD*03.04) shared with RHD*DIIIa (RHD*03.01) three nucleotide (nt) changes (186G>T, 410C>T, 455A>C) but lacked two other changes: 602C>G and 667T>G.2,4 RHD*DIII type 5 was made obsolete after it was shown to be the RHD*DIIIa allele.5 Grootkerk-Tax et al. found that RHD*DIII type 6 (RHD*03.06) differs from RHD*DIIIa in that it lacks the nucleotide change of 186G>T and that RHD*DIII type 7 is identical to the RHD*DIII type 6 for the nucleotide changes except it has exon 2 from RHCE*c in place of RHD.6 They found that RBCs from a donor with the DIII type 6 phenotype were agglutinated by 59 monoclonal (mab) anti-D, a minority giving weaker reactions than an R1r control RBC sample. They were not agglutinated by one mab anti-D, which weakly agglutinated (1+) the control RBCs.6 Grootkerk-Tax et al., found RHD*DIII type 7 in one donor from South Africa. RBCs from this donor were agglutinated to a strength of 2+ with mab anti-D and 1+ with polyclonal anti-D. Insufficient RBCs were available for extended hemagglutination testing and the G type was not noted.6
In 1995, two samples with a replacement of RHD exon 2 by RHCE*c exon 2 were reported, and were presumed to be DIIIb.8 However, as both samples were from Caucasians, the RBCs not only had a very weak expression of D (detectable only by the indirect antiglobulin test) but were not agglutinated by all monoclonal anti-D9, and the variant D antigen traveled with cE, the samples did not meet the characteristics defined by Tippett and Sanger for a category DIIIb.3 In retrospect, it is likely that these RBCs were weak D, G− and not DIIIb.
During DNA-based screening tests on people of African ancestry, we identified a second example of DIII type 7, also in a South African donor. This finding prompted this study, the purpose of which was to define the serologic characteristics of RBCs with the DIII type 7 phenotype. Our findings lead us to propose that the DIII type 7 phenotype is more likely the DIIIb phenotype of Tippett and Sanger than the DIIIb reported by Rouillac and coworkers.8
Materials and Methods
Sample and hemagglutination
The sample described herein (MA113-09) was from a South African blood donor (code name Marcus). The various RBC samples and reagents used in the hemagglutination testing were from our collection. Hemagglutination was performed by standard methods.11,12
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, amplification, and sequencing
A cryopreserved blood sample from MA113-09 was thawed and RNA isolated from the reticulocytes by standard methods using TriZol and PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Reverse transcription was carried out with gene-specific RHD and RHCE primers and Superscript III according to manufacturer’s instructions (Superscript III first-strand synthesis SuperMix, Invitrogen), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was carried out with primers to amplify exons 1 to 4 and exons 5 to 10 in RHD and RHCE as described previously.13 RT-PCR products were directly sequenced by GENEWIZ, Inc. (South Plainfield, NJ). Sequences were aligned, and protein sequence comparisons were performed with Sequencher v4.9 (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI).
Genomic DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing
Standard methods were used to extract genomic DNA from 200μl of the thawed blood sample (MA113-09) with a commercial kit (QIAamp, Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). To overcome messy sequences, PCR amplification of RHD exons 7 and 8 was conducted separately on genomic DNA. PCR was carried out using HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). The following primers were used: for exon 7: RhD-I6F (5′-cttcatttcaacaaactccccga-3′) and DNB-R (5′-gtgataaatccatccaaggtaggggccggccagaat-3′); and for exon 8: RhD-I7F (5′-ctggaggctctgagaggttgag-3′) Rh-I8-R (5′-catagacatccagccacacggca-3′).
Results
DNA Testing
Molecular analyses of RHD showed the proband had RHD*DIII type 7 (either homozygous or hemizygous) with the following nucleotide changes: 150T>C, 178A>C, 201G>A, 203G>A, 307T>C in exon 2 (RHCE*c), and 410C>T in exon 3; 455A>C in exon 3; 602C>G in exon 4; 667T>G in exon 5. The GenBank accession number for this allele (ISBT provisional name RHD*03.02) is JF436967.
Molecular analyses of RHCE showed the proband was homozygous for RHCE*ceS (RHCE*ceVS.04; RHCE*ce48G>C; 733C>G; 1006G>T).
Hemagglutination
When tested with 24 monoclonal anti-D, the proband’s RBCs were agglutinated (2+ to 4+) by those that reacted with a strength of 2+ or greater with control RBCs but were not agglutinated by those giving a 1+ reaction with the control RBCs. This is consistent with the results reported by Grootkerk-Tax, et al.6 RBCs from MA113-09 were also tested with a collection of alloanti-D made by D+ people. Five anti-D made by DIIIa people were non-reactive. Three anti-D made by DIVa people, one anti-D made by a DVa person, and six of seven anti-D made by DVI people were reactive. These results indicate that the DIII type 7 RBCs lack the same RhD epitopes as RBCs with the DIIIa phenotype.
The proband’s RBCs were tested with anti-G: two polyclonal anti-G (EBS, GH) and one monoclonal anti-G (MS1) were non-reactive. Anti-DAK (AK, Riz) agglutinated the proband’s RBCs. Taken together the donor’s RBCs typed D+C−E−c+e+G−DAK+.
Conclusions
,We identified a second example of RHD*DIII type 7 in a donor of African heritage. This allele carries missense nucleotide changes identical to RHD*DIII type 6 in exon 3 (410C>T, 455A>C), exon 4 (602C>G), exon 5 (667T>G), but differs in that exon 2 derives from RHCE*c in place of RHD (150T>C, 178A>C, 201G>A, 203G>A, 307T>C). Fortuitously, as the allele was homozygous (or hemizygous) we were able to perform extensive serological testing on the RBCs.
The reactivity of the proband’s RBCs with reagent anti-D and with anti-D made by people with DIVa, DVa, and DVI partial D antigens, and the absence of reactivity with anti-D made by DIIIa people is strong evidence that DIII type 7 belongs in the original classification of DIII. Based on the serological similarity and nucleotide sequence, we conclude that DIII type 7 is more likely to be DIIIb as defined by Tippett and Sanger in 1977,3 than the samples analyzed by Rouillac, et al. in 1995.8 (see table 1) Evidence for this conclusion is as follows: (i) both probands are African, whereas the two ‘DIIIb’ samples of Rouillac and colleagues were from Caucasians, (ii) in both probands, DIII type 7 travels with ce (a characteristic of the original DIIIb classification), whereas in the probands reported as DIIIb by Rouillac et al, the altered D traveled with cE (R2r“ and R2r); (iii) the reactivity of the original DIIIa, DIIIb and DIIIc RBCs with polyclonal and monoclonal anti-D was similar in direct testing, while the samples reported by Rouillac et al., were only agglutinated in the indirect antiglobulin test.;
Table 1.
Comparison of DIIIb of Tippett and Sanger, ‘DIIIb’ of Rouillac, et al, and DIII type 7
| Characteristic | DIIIb of Tippett and Sanger3 |
DIIIb of Rouillac, et al8 |
DIII type 76 (and this paper) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnicity | African | Caucasian | African |
| D antigen travels with | ce | cE | ce |
| D type | D+ | D+W | D+ |
| Reagent anti-D | Agglutinated in direct tests |
Not agglutinated in direct tests |
Agglutinated in direct tests |
| Anti-D from DIIIa people | Not agglutinated | Not reported | Not agglutinated |
| Anti-D from people with DIVa, DVa, or DVI partial D phenotypes |
Agglutinated | Not reported | Agglutinated |
In conclusion, four DIII phenotypes are considered to belong in the DIVa cluster6,7, namely, DIIIa (encoded by RHD*03.01), DIII type 4 (encoded by RHD*03.04),, DIII type 6 (encoded by RHD*03.06),, and DIII type 7 (encoded by RHD*03.02 and so named by the ISBT working party because it is likely the original DIIIb category3). (Figure 1) These alleles have been so far only found in people of African Ancestry. The RHD*D-c(exon 2)-D hybrid, said to encode DIIIb8, is actually a weak D phenotype found in Caucasians. The DIIIc phenotype (encoded by RHD*03.04) also has been found only in Caucasians and does not belong in the DIVa cluster. The ISBT Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology has given provisional numerical names to these allele.
Figure 1.
Family of DIII alleles: Comparison of RHD exons; relevant nucleotides changes, and amino acids changes and selected antigen typing for RhD.
RHD exons are represented by black boxes; RHCE exons are represented by white boxes. Silent nucleotides are not given. Antigen typings are given where the information was recorded.
Acknowledgements
We thank Elizabeth Smart from South Africa, who, several years ago, shared a blood sample from ‘Marcus’ and the technologists in the Laboratory of Immunohematology for serological testing. This study was supported in part by grant NIH HL091030 (CHH, MER). The authors certify that they have no affiliation with or financial involvement in any organization or entity with a direct financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this paper.
Footnotes
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the manuscript submitted to Transfusion.
References
- 1.Reid ME, Lomas-Francis C. Blood Group Antigen FactsBook. 2nd ed. Academic Press; San Diego: 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 2.RhesusBase [website]. www.uni-ulm.de/~fwagner/RH/RB/mutind.htm.
- 3.Tippett P, Sanger R. Further observations of subdivisions of the Rh antigen D. Das Ärztiiche Laboratorium. 1977;23:476–80. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wagner FF, Frohmajer A, Ladewig B, Eicher NI, Lonicer CB, Muller TH, Siegel MH, Flegel WA. Weak D alleles express distinct phenotypes. Blood. 2000;95:2699–708. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Westhoff CM, Vege S, Halter-Hipsky C, Whorley T, Hue-Roye K, Lomas-Francis C, Reid ME. DIIIa and DIII Type 5 are encoded by the same allele and are associated with altered RHCE*ce alleles: clinical implications. Transfusion. 2010;50:1303–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02573.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grootkerk-Tax MG, van Wintershoven JD, Ligthart PC, van Rhenen DJ, van der Schoot CE, Maaskant-van Wijk PA. RHD(T201R, F223V) cluster analysis in five different ethnic groups and serologic characterization of a new Ethiopian variant DARE, the DIII type 6, and the RHD(F223V) Transfusion. 2006;46:606–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wagner FF, Ladewig B, Angert KS, Heymann GA, Eicher NI, Flegel WA. The DAU allele cluster of the RHD gene. Blood. 2002;100:306–11. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rouillac C, Le Van Kim C, Blancher A, Roubinet F, Cartron J-P, Colin Y. Lack of G blood group antigen in DIIIb erythrocytes is associated with segmental DNA exchange between RH genes. Br.J.Haematol. 1995;89:424–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1995.tb03323.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Roubinet F, Apoil PA, Blancher A. Frequency of partial D phenotypes in the South Western region of France. Transfus.Clin.Biol. 1996;4:247–55. doi: 10.1016/s1246-7820(96)80004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Apoil PA, Reid ME, Halverson G, Mouro I, Colin Y, Roubinet F, Cartron J-P, Blancher A. A human monoclonal anti-D antibody which detects a nonconformation-dependent epitope on the RhD protein by immunoblotting. British Journal of Haematology. 1997;98:365–74. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.2183041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Judd WJ, Johnson ST, Storry JR. Judd’s Methods in Immunohematology. 3rd ed. AABB Press; Bethesda, MD: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Roback JD, Combs MR, Grossman BJ, Hillyer CD. Technical Manual. 16th ed. AABB; Bethesda, MD: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Halter Hipsky C, Lomas-Francis C, Fuchisawa A, Reid ME, Moulds M, Christensen J, Nickle P, Vege S, Westhoff C. RHCE*ceCF encodes partial c and partial e but not CELO an antigen antithetical to Crawford. Transfusion. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02764.x. Prepress electronic preview. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

