Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1981 May;78(5):2972–2976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2972

Methylmercury(II) binding to single-stranded and duplex DNA: complexes formed are distinguishable by optical detection of magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

A H Maki, C M Ott
PMCID: PMC319481  PMID: 6942412

Abstract

Binding of CH3Hg(II) to duplex and single-stranded calf thymus DNA leads to an external heavy atom effect that is associated with the formation of complexes directly with the purine and pyrimidine bases. When CH3Hg(II) is added at a concentration insufficient to cause denaturation, clearly distinguishable optical detection of magnetic resonance spectra are observed from the duplex and single-stranded DNA complexes. Comparison of the dominant signals with those observed from CH3Hg(II) complexes of model mononucleotides and mononucleosides allows their identification as guanine complexed at N7 in the duplex sample and thymine complexed at N3 in the single-stranded sample. On the basis of these measurements, it is estimated that this experiment presently is capable of detecting about 2% single-stranded DNA in a sample made up predominantly after duplex structure.

Full text

PDF
2972

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson R. R., Maki A. H., Ott C. M. Detection and characterization of complexes of methylmercury (II) with duplex deoxyribonucleic acid and synthetic copolymers by optical detection of magnetic resonance. Biochemistry. 1980 Sep 16;19(19):4412–4418. doi: 10.1021/bi00560a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beerman T. A., Lebowitz J. Further analysis of the altered secondary structure of superhelical DNA. Sensitivity to methylmercuric hydroxide a chemical probe for unpaired bases. J Mol Biol. 1973 Sep 25;79(3):451–470. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90398-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chrisman R. W., Mansy S., Peresie H. J., Ranade A., Berg T. A., Tobias R. S. Heavy metal-nucleotide interactions. IX. Raman difference spectroscopic studies on the binding of CH3Hg(II) to 1-methylthymine, thymidine-5'-monophosphate, DNA models and native DNA. Bioinorg Chem. 1977;7(3):245–266. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3061(00)80098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clegg M. S., Gruenwedel D. W. Circular dichroism and ultraviolet absorbance of calf thymus DNA in presence of CH3HgOH. Z Naturforsch C. 1979 Mar-Apr;34(3-4):259–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gruenwedel D. W., Davidson N. Complexing and denaturation of DNA by methylmercuric hydroxide. I. Spectrophotometric studies. J Mol Biol. 1966 Oct 28;21(1):129–144. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(66)90084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gruenwedel D. W., Davidson N. Complexing and denaturation of DNA by methylmercuric hydroxide. II. Ultracentrifugation studies. Biopolymers. 1967;5(9):847–861. doi: 10.1002/bip.1967.360050907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hershberger M. V., Maki A. H. Heavy-atom effects associated with methylmercury(II) binding to rabbit glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Biopolymers. 1980 Jul;19(7):1329–1344. doi: 10.1002/bip.1980.360190709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES