Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1981 Jun;78(6):3413–3417. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3413

Modification of microtubule steady-state dynamics by phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated proteins.

L Jameson, M Caplow
PMCID: PMC319578  PMID: 6943550

Abstract

Phosphorylation of purified microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) inhibits the rate and extent of MAP-stimulated microtubule assembly. The extent of microtubule assembly is reduced as a result of a decrease in the fraction of tubulin polymerized, without a significant change in the critical protein concentration. The decreased rate of microtubule assembly using phosphorylated MAPs reflects a reduction in microtubule nucleation resulting in fewer, but 2-fold longer, microtubules at steady state. Analysis of microtubule (MT) dynamics at steady state reveals that the rate of directional incorporation of subunits (flux) is 22 subunits.MT-1.sec-1 with phosphorylated MAPs, compared to 10 subunits.MT-1.sec-1 with unphosphorylated MAPs. The initial rate of disassembly determined by isothermal dilution is 232 subunits.MT-1.sec-1 for microtubules assembled with phosphorylated MAPs, compared to 102 subunits.MT-1.sec-1 for microtubules assembled with unphosphorylated MAPs. By using these results, the directionality (the number of successful subunit additions relative to the total number of association events per unit time) for subunit addition is found to be 0.1 for microtubules assembled with either phosphorylated or unphosphorylated MAPs. These observations are interpreted in terms of a mechanism in which phosphorylation of MAPs increases the rate of steady-state subunit flux by an equivalent enhancement of the rates of subunit association and dissociation, such that the critical protein concentration and directionality remain unchanged.

Full text

PDF
3413

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos L., Klug A. Arrangement of subunits in flagellar microtubules. J Cell Sci. 1974 May;14(3):523–549. doi: 10.1242/jcs.14.3.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DiPasquale A. M., McGuire J., Moellmann G., Wasserman S. J. Microtubule assembly in cultivated Greene melanoma cells is stimulated by dibutyryl adenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate or cholera toxin. J Cell Biol. 1976 Dec;71(3):735–748. doi: 10.1083/jcb.71.3.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jameson L., Frey T., Zeeberg B., Dalldorf F., Caplow M. Inhibition of microtubule assembly by phosphorylation of microtubule-associated proteins. Biochemistry. 1980 May 27;19(11):2472–2479. doi: 10.1021/bi00552a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson K. A., Borisy G. G. Kinetic analysis of microtubule self-assembly in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1977 Nov 25;117(1):1–31. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Karr T. L., Kristofferson D., Purich D. L. Mechanism of microtubule depolymerization. Correlation of rapid induced disassembly experiments with a kinetic model for endwise depolymerization. J Biol Chem. 1980 Sep 25;255(18):8560–8566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Karr T. L., Purich D. L. A microtubule assembly/disassembly model based on drug effects and depolymerization kinetics after rapid dilution. J Biol Chem. 1979 Nov 10;254(21):10885–10888. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kram R., Tomkins G. M. Pleiotypic control by cyclic AMP: interaction with cyclic GMP and possible role of microtubules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Jun;70(6):1659–1663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.6.1659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Margolis R. L., Wilson L., Keifer B. I. Mitotic mechanism based on intrinsic microtubule behaviour. Nature. 1978 Mar 30;272(5652):450–452. doi: 10.1038/272450a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Margolis R. L., Wilson L. Opposite end assembly and disassembly of microtubules at steady state in vitro. Cell. 1978 Jan;13(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90132-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Margolis R. L., Wilson L. Regulation of the microtubule steady state in vitro by ATP. Cell. 1979 Nov;18(3):673–679. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90122-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Murphy D. B., Johnson K. A., Borisy G. G. Role of tubulin-associated proteins in microtubule nucleation and elongation. J Mol Biol. 1977 Nov 25;117(1):33–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. OOSAWA F., KASAI M. A theory of linear and helical aggregations of macromolecules. J Mol Biol. 1962 Jan;4:10–21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sloboda R. D., Rudolph S. A., Rosenbaum J. L., Greengard P. Cyclic AMP-dependent endogenous phosphorylation of a microtubule-associated protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):177–181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wegner A. Head to tail polymerization of actin. J Mol Biol. 1976 Nov;108(1):139–150. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(76)80100-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weingarten M. D., Lockwood A. H., Hwo S. Y., Kirschner M. W. A protein factor essential for microtubule assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 May;72(5):1858–1862. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.5.1858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weisenberg R. C., Deery W. J., Dickinson P. J. Tubulin-nucleotide interactions during the polymerization and depolymerization of microtubules. Biochemistry. 1976 Sep 21;15(19):4248–4254. doi: 10.1021/bi00664a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zeeberg B., Reid R., Caplow M. Incorporation of radioactive tubulin into microtubules at steady state. Experimental and theoretical analyses of diffusional and directional flux. J Biol Chem. 1980 Oct 25;255(20):9891–9899. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES