Abstract
Betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase (BHMT) uses betaine to catalyze the conversion of homocysteine (Hcy) to methionine. There are common genetic polymorphisms in the BHMT gene in humans that can alter its enzymatic activity. We generated the first Bhmt−/− mouse to model the functional effects of mutations that result in reduced BHMT activity. Deletion of Bhmt resulted in a 6-fold increase (p < 0.01) in hepatic and an 8-fold increase (p < 0.01) in plasma total Hcy concentrations. Deletion of Bhmt resulted in a 43% reduction in hepatic S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) (p < 0.01) and a 3-fold increase in hepatic S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) (p < 0.01) concentrations, resulting in a 75% reduction in methylation potential (AdoMet:AdoHcy) (p < 0.01). Bhmt−/− mice accumulated betaine in most tissues, including a 21-fold increase in the liver concentration compared with wild type (WT) (p < 0.01). These mice had lower concentrations of choline, phosphocholine, glycerophosphocholine, phosphatidylcholine, and sphingomyelin in several tissues. At 5 weeks of age, Bhmt−/− mice had 36% lower total hepatic phospholipid concentrations and a 6-fold increase in hepatic triacyglycerol concentrations compared with WT (p < 0.01), which was due to a decrease in the secretion of very low density lipoproteins. At 1 year of age, 64% of Bhmt−/− mice had visible hepatic tumors. Histopathological analysis revealed that Bhmt−/− mice developed hepatocellular carcinoma or carcinoma precursors. These results indicate that BHMT has an important role in Hcy, choline, and one-carbon homeostasis. A lack of Bhmt also affects susceptibility to fatty liver and hepatocellular carcinoma. We suggest that functional polymorphisms in BHMT that significantly reduce activity may have similar effects in humans.
Keywords: Homocysteine, Liver Cancer, Liver Metabolism, One Carbon Pool, Phospholipid, Betaine, Betaine Homocysteine Methyltransferase, Choline, Fatty Liver
Introduction
Betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase (BHMT)2 is a zinc-dependent cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the transfer of a methyl group from betaine to homocysteine (Hcy) forming dimethylglycine and methionine (Met) (Fig. 5). Humans have common single nucleotide polymorphisms in the BHMT gene that alter BHMT enzyme activity and function (1). A common BHMT single nucleotide polymorphism rs3733890 (41% of NC population has 1 variant allele, and 8% have 2 alleles (2)) was associated with increased risk for having babies with neural tube defects (3), decreased risk for developing cardiovascular disease (4), and reduced risk for breast cancer-specific mortality (5). The epidemiological evidence suggests the importance of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the gene. However, the metabolic consequences of having null mutations of the BHMT gene have not been thoroughly investigated. To directly investigate the role of BHMT in vivo, we generated and characterized mice in which the gene encoding Bhmt was deleted (Bhmt−/−).
BHMT activity is found at high levels in the liver and kidney, and low levels in the brain, lenses, and other human tissues. In rodents, high levels of BHMT activity are only found in the liver (6). Betaine, the methyl donor for BHMT, comes from either dietary sources or from oxidation of choline (an irreversible reaction) by choline dehydrogenase (CHDH). Alternatively, choline can be used to form the phospholipid phosphatidylcholine (PtdCho) or the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (7). The product of BHMT, methionine, is the precursor for S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet), the major methyl donor for most biological methylations, including DNA and histone methylation, the conversion of glycine to methylglycine (catalyzed by glycine methyltransferase (GNMT)), and the methylation of phosphatidylethanolamine (PtdEtn) to form PtdCho (catalyzed by phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT)).
The other substrate for BHMT is Hcy, a thiol-containing amino acid, which, when elevated in plasma, is associated with cardiovascular diseases, pregnancy complications, renal insufficiency, and cognitive impairment (8). Hcy is converted to methionine by BHMT or by methionine synthase, the latter of which uses methyltetrahydrofolate (methyl-THF) as the methyl donor (supplied by methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase) (9). Alternatively, Hcy is removed by the trans-sulfuration pathway, forming cystathionine and cysteine catalyzed by the enzymes cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS) and cystathionine-γ-lyase (CγL), respectively (9). Both enzymes require vitamin B6; CBS also requires AdoMet as the allosteric activator (9). All the above pathways might be perturbed with the deletion of Bhmt. Here, we report on the metabolic phenotype of the first Bhmt knock-out mouse created.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Generation of Bhmt−/− Mice
The gene targeting vector was designed to remove exons 6 and 7, the zinc-binding domains of the gene (Fig. 1A). The targeting vector was constructed by placing a MC1-neomycin (Neo) selectable marker flanked by 2 flippase (FLP) recognition target (FRT) sites and 1 locus of X-over P1 (loxP) site ∼330 bp downstream of exon 7. A second loxP site was introduced ∼240 bp upstream of exon 6. The vector was electroporated into E14Tg2A embryonic stem cells. Targeted cells were screened by PCR, confirmed by Southern blot analysis, and injected into blastocysts derived from mouse strain C57Bl/6 to create Bhmt transmitting chimeras. Neo deleted mice were generated by crossing the transmitting chimeras with Flpe deleters (number 003800, Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME), which expressed Flpe recombinase that recognized FRT sites and deleted the Neo cassette. Bhmt knock-out mice were generated by crossing the Neo deleted mice with Cre deleters (number 003724, Jackson Laboratory), which expressed Cre recombinase that recognized loxP sites and deleted exons 6 and 7. Bhmt knock-out mice were continuously backcrossed to C57Bl/6 mice. Generations F1 to F4 were used in this study.
For all experiments, Bhmt+/+, Bhmt+/−, and Bhmt−/− littermates born of Bhmt+/− mating pairs were used to control the mixed genetic background. Mice were genotyped by PCR using TaKaRa Ex TaqDNA polymerase (TaKaRa Bio USA, Madison, WI) and the following primer sequences: Bhmt+/+ forward, 5′-GACTTTTAAAGAGTGGTGGTACATACCTTG-3′,Bhmt+/+ reverse, 5′-TCTCTCTGCAGCCACATCTGAACTTGTCTG-3′, Bhmt−/− forward, 5′-TTAACTCAACATCACAACAACAGATTTCAG-3′, Bhmt−/− reverse, 5′-TTGTCGACGGATCCATAACTTCGTATAAT-3′. PCR conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 2 min; 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 64 °C for 2 min, and 72 °C for 2 min; and 72 °C for 6 min. Bhmt+/+ PCR product was 1.6 kb in size, whereas Bhmt−/− was 545 bp (Fig. 1B). The animals were kept in a temperature-controlled environment at 24 °C and exposed to a 12-h light and dark cycle. All animals received AIN-76A pelleted diet with 1.1 g/kg choline chloride (Dyets, Bethlehem, PA). The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill approved all experimental protocols.
Reproducibility, Viability, Body Weight, Body Length, and Life Span
Pairs of Bhmt+/+, Bhmt+/−, and Bhmt−/− parents were bred to assess their reproductive potential. Sizes, genotype distribution, and gender distribution of litters were recorded. Body weights and lengths (nose to hip, nose to tail) of Bhmt+/+, Bhmt+/−, and Bhmt−/− mice were measured from age 3.5 to 20 weeks old using a scale and a ruler, respectively. Eleven Bhmt+/+ and 14 Bhmt−/− mice were maintained over the course of a year to determine 1-year survival rates.
Western Blot and Enzymatic Assay
Mice were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane (Hospira, Lake Forest, IL). Tissues were harvested, weighted, snap frozen, pulverized under liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until used. Western blot analysis of BHMT was performed in liver homogenate as previously described (10). For all enzymatic assays, pulverized liver from 5-week-old mice were homogenized in buffer using a motorized tissue homogenizer (Talboys Engineering Corporation, Montrose, PA). BHMT activity was measured as the conversion of [14C]betaine to [14C]methionine and [14C]dimethylglycine as previously described (11). CHDH activity was measured as the conversion of [14C]choline to [14C]betaine as previously described (12) using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a Varian ProStar HPLC system (PS-210, Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA) with a Pecosphere Silica column, 4.6 × 83 mm (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and a Berthold LB506 C-1 radiodetector (Oak Ridge, TN). GNMT activity was measured as the conversion of [3H]AdoMet to [3H]methylglycine using the charcoal absorption method as previously described (13). PEMT activity was measured as the conversion of [3H]AdoMet to [3H]PtdCho as previously described (14, 15). Protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford Assay (16).
Choline and Homocysteine Metabolites
Tissues from 5-week-old animals were harvested as described above. Blood was collected via cardiac puncture, and plasma was isolated by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 5 min at room temperature. The concentrations of choline metabolites were measured by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-isotope dilution mass spectrometry as previously described (17). The concentration of AdoMet and S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) were measured using the Varian ProStar HPLC system as previously described (18, 19) with an Ultrasphere ODS 5-μm C18 column, 4.6 × 25 cm (number 235329, Fullerton, CA), and a UV-visible detector (model 118, Gilson, Middleton, WI). Plasma total Hcy (tHcy) and cysteine were measured after derivatizing 50 μl of plasma with 7-fluorobenzofurazan-4-sulfonic acid. The derivatized products were measured as previously described (20) using the Varian ProStar HPLC system with a Microsorb-MV 5-μm C18 column, 4.6 mm × 25 cm (Varian) and a Prostar model 360 fluorescence detector (Varian). Mercaptopropinylglycine (10 μm) was used as an internal standard. Hepatic tHcy, cystathionine, methionine, cysteine, methylglycine, dimethylglycine, and glycine were measured as previously described (21) using capillary stable isotope dilution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Hewlett-Packard Co., Palo Alto, CA). Plasma total folate was measured using Lactobacillus casei assay as previously described (22).
Clinical Analysis
Concentrations of plasma urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine as well as activities of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alanine transaminase (ALT), and creatinine kinase (CK) were measured using an automatic chemical analyzer (Johnson and Johnson VT250, Rochester, NY) at the Animal Clinical Chemistry and Gene Expression Facility, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Urine-specific gravity was measured using a refractometer (AO Instrument Co., Buffalo, NY) at the Department of Laboratory Animal Medicine Veterinary and Technical Services Facility, UNC, Chapel Hill. Plasma triacylglycerol (TAG), β-hydroxybutyrate (Stanbio, Boerme, TX), cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), and glucose (Wako, Richmond, VA) were measured colorimetrically per the manufacturer's instructions.
Triacylglycerol, Phospholipids, and Cholesterol
PtdCho, PtdEtn, phosphatidylserine (PtdSer), and phosphatidylinositol (PtdIns) were extracted from the liver of 5-week-old mice using the Bligh and Dyer method (23), and isolated by thin layer chromatography (TLC) (24). Concentrations were determined using a phosphate assay (25). TAG was extracted from liver samples using the Folch method (26) and measured colorimetrically as described above.
In Vivo VLDL Secretion Rate
5-week-old animals were fasted for 4 h. 500 mg/kg body weight of Triton WR1339 (as a 7.5% solution dissolved in PBS) was injected retro-orbitally. Blood samples were taken using heparinized capillary tubes retro-orbitally at 2, 30, 60, and 120 min after Triton WR1339 injection for TAG measurement as an indicator of the secretion rate of the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL).
Tissue Histology
Liver was harvested and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.2% gluteraldehyde for 48 h. Liver was processed, paraffin embedded, sectioned at 5 μm, and stained with hemotoxylin and eosin as previously described (27). For tumor analysis, whole liver was sectioned serially, and multiple sections per sample were examined by 2 veterinary pathologists from the Department of Laboratory Animal Medicine, UNC, Chapel Hill. High resolution images were collected using a Zeiss Axiovision A1 upright microscope.
γ-Glutamyltransferase 1 (γGT1)
γGT1 levels were determined using ELISA (Cedarlane, Burlington, NC). Frozen liver samples from 1-year-old mice were homogenized in ice-cold PBS at pH 7.0 containing 10% protease inhibitors (Sigma) using an ultrasonic cell disruptor. The resulting suspension was centrifuged and protein levels were determined by the Lowry method (28). Equal amounts of proteins were loaded onto the ELISA plate according to the manufacturer's protocol. The optical density was read at 450 nm on a Synergy 2 microplate reader (Biotek, VT).
Statistics
Statistical differences were determined using analysis of variance, Tukey-Kramer HSD, and Student's t test JMP version 6.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and reported as mean ± S.E.
RESULTS
Generation and Validation of Bhmt Knock-out Mice
Bhmt−/− mice were generated using a cre/loxP system to delete exons 6 and 7, which contain the zinc-binding domain essential for BHMT activity. The mouse genotype was confirmed by PCR using genomic DNA (Fig. 1B). Bhmt−/− mice were also validated by assaying hepatic BHMT activity (Fig. 1C) and Western blot (Fig. 1D). Deletion of 1 allele of Bhmt resulted in a 46% reduction of activity, whereas deletion of both alleles resulted in the absence of activity. BHMT protein is predominantly found in mouse liver and was absent in Bhmt−/− liver.
Bhmt Deletion Had No Effect on Reproductive Capacity or Fetal Viability
Mating pairs of Bhmt+/+, Bhmt+/−, and Bhmt−/− mice produced offspring with similar litter size (7.5 pups/litter) with evenly distributed genders. Bhmt+/− breeding pairs were used to generate littermates of Bhmt+/+, Bhmt+/−, and Bhmt−/− mice for all experiments. Bhmt+/− breeding pairs produced offspring at the expected Mendelian ratio, with 24.5% Bhmt+/+, 49.7% Bhmt+/−, and 25.8% Bhmt−/− mice. The Bhmt+/+ and Bhmt−/− mice appeared healthy and lived for at least 1 year.
Bhmt−/− Mice Had Reduced Body Weight at Early Age
Body length and weight of pups were monitored from 3.5 to 20 weeks of age. There was no significant difference in body length among Bhmt+/+, Bhmt+/−, and Bhmt−/− mice (data not shown), and in body weight between Bhmt+/+ and Bhmt+/− mice (Fig. 1E). Bhmt−/− mice started with similar body weights as did Bhmt+/+ mice at weaning (3.5 weeks), but gained less weight between 5 and 9 weeks of age (p < 0.05). The weight difference did not persist after 9 weeks of age.
Bhmt Deletion Resulted in Altered Concentrations of Choline and Its Metabolites
Bhmt is predominantly found in the liver, however, complete deletion of Bhmt (Bhmt−/−) resulted in a substantial increase in concentrations of betaine in liver (by 21-fold; p < 0.001), kidney (by 5-fold; p < 0.001), heart (by 14-fold; p < 0.001), brain (by 5-fold; p < 0.001), muscle (by 12-fold; p < 0.001), adipose (by 2-fold; p < 0.001), lung (by 11-fold; p < 0.001), and plasma (by 16-fold; p < 0.001) compared with Bhmt+/+ mice (Table 1). Deletion of Bhmt resulted in reduced concentrations of choline in liver (by 82%; p < 0.01), kidney (by 38%; p < 0.01), heart (by 42%; p < 0.05), and adipose (by 53%; p < 0.01) compared with Bhmt+/+ mice. Deletion of Bhmt resulted in reduced concentrations of PtdCho in liver (by 26%; p < 0.01), kidney (by 21%; p < 0.05), heart (by 25%; p < 0.01), muscle (by 25%; p < 0.05), and plasma (by 31%; p < 0.001) compared with Bhmt+/+ mice. Deletion of Bhmt resulted in reduced concentrations of phosphocholine (PCho) in liver (by 72%; p < 0.01), heart (by 24%; p < 0.05), muscle (by 65%; p < 0.001), and adipose (by 68%; p < 0.01) compared with Bhmt+/+ mice. Deletion of Bhmt resulted in reduced concentrations of glycerophosphocholine (GPCho) in liver (p < 0.01), kidney (p < 0.05), heart (p < 0.001), adipose (p < 0.05), and lung (p < 0.01), as well as reduced concentrations of sphingomyelin in kidney (p < 0.05) and heart (p < 0.001) compared with Bhmt+/+ mice. In testis, there was no change in any choline metabolites in Bhmt−/− mice. Deletion of 1 copy of Bhmt (Bhmt+/−) resulted in choline metabolite concentrations in tissues similar to those of Bhmt+/+ mice (supplemental Table S1).
TABLE 1.
Betaine | Choline | GPCho | PCho | PtdCho | Sphingomyelin | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liver | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | 1,321 ± 254 | 154 ± 36 | 1,730 ± 554 | 294 ± 67 | 15,897 ± 1,200 | 1,018 ± 131 |
Bhmt−/− | 27,314 ± 2,001a | 28 ± 8b | 266 ± 38b | 81 ± 7b | 11,686 ± 305b | 838 ± 37 |
Kidney | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | 1,151 ± 91 | 779 ± 60 | 15,608 ± 1,475 | 853 ± 37 | 16,088 ± 1,025 | 3,373 ± 277 |
Bhmt−/− | 5,424 ± 505a | 481 ± 48b | 10,948 ± 672c | 792 ± 41 | 12,707 ± 304c | 2,685 ± 74c |
Heart | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | 77 ± 11 | 84 ± 12 | 164 ± 7 | 199 ± 12 | 11,111 ± 535 | 879 ± 50 |
Bhmt−/− | 1,070 ± 131a | 49 ± 6c | 88 ± 10a | 151 ± 14c | 8,381 ± 455b | 583 ± 44a |
Brain | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | 22 ± 2 | 183 ± 26 | 1,208 ± 52 | 579 ± 33 | 22,856 ± 1,147 | 2,191 ± 149 |
Bhmt−/− | 100 ± 10a | 174 ± 15 | 1,120 ± 57 | 502 ± 9 | 21,020 ± 271 | 1,834 ± 52 |
Muscle | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | 44 ± 3 | 67 ± 15 | 67 ± 4 | 51 ± 6 | 7,893 ± 655 | 411 ± 15 |
Bhmt−/− | 529 ± 36a | 28 ± 3c | 58 ± 6 | 18 ± 3a | 5,942 ± 238c | 390 ± 13 |
Adipose | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | 142 ± 25 | 73 ± 12 | 802 ± 223 | 90 ± 6 | 2,500 ± 217 | 156 ± 14 |
Bhmt−/− | 284 ± 18a | 34 ± 5b | 246 ± 79c | 29 ± 7c | 2,288 ± 271 | 144 ± 18 |
Lung | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | 206 ± 17 | 198 ± 24 | 3,586 ± 348 | 551 ± 26 | 14,693 ± 344 | 2,389 ± 65 |
Bhmt−/− | 2,237 ± 123a | 188 ± 23 | 2,063 ± 82a | 465 ± 42 | 14,437 ± 192 | 2,387 ± 47 |
Plasma | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | 48 ± 3 | 20 ± 4 | NDd | ND | 1,590 ± 81 | 145 ± 10 |
Bhmt−/− | 772 ± 173a | 13 ± 2 | ND | ND | 1,098 ± 71a | 114 ± 77 |
Testis | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | 2,014 ± 312 | 298 ± 51 | 809 ± 26 | 3,831 ± 270 | 5,760 ± 387 | 886 ± 74 |
Bhmt−/− | 2,018 ± 111 | 241 ± 10 | 565 ± 47 | 3,706 ± 234 | 5,942 ± 233 | 954 ± 38 |
a p < 0.001 different from Bhmt+/+ by Student's t test. Concentrations are expressed as nmol/g, except for plasma, which is nmol/ml.
b p < 0.01, different from Bhmt+/+ by Students' t test. Concentrations are expressed as nmol/g, except for plasma, which is nmol/ml.
c p < 0.05, different from Bhmt+/+ by Students' t test. Concentrations are expressed as nmol/g, except for plasma, which is nmol/ml.
d ND, not detected.
Bhmt Deletion Resulted in Altered Concentrations of Hcy, AdoMet, AdoHcy, and Related Metabolites
In liver, complete deletion of Bhmt resulted in a 43% decrease in AdoMet concentrations (p < 0.01), and a 2.6-fold increase in AdoHcy concentrations (p < 0.01), resulting in a 76% reduction in methylation potential (AdoMet:AdoHcy) ratios (0.9 ± 0.1 in Bhmt−/− versus 3.6 ± 0.2 in Bhmt+/+; p < 0.01) (Table 2). Bhmt−/− mice also had reduced hepatic concentrations of dimethylglycine (by 95%; p < 0.001), but had increased hepatic concentrations of tHcy (by 6-fold; p < 0.01) and methylglycine (by 2.6-fold; p < 0.05) compared with Bhmt+/+ mice. Hepatic cystathionine, cysteine, methionine, and glycine did not differ among genotypes. In plasma, deletion of Bhmt resulted in increased concentrations of tHcy (by 7.8-fold; p < 0.001), decreased concentrations of cysteine (by 48%; p < 0.01), and decreased concentrations of total folate (by 35%; p < 0.01) compared with plasma from Bhmt+/+ mice. Deletion of 1 copy of Bhmt (Bhmt+/−) did not result in changes in hepatic methylation potential, plasma tHcy, or plasma total folate compared with Bhmt+/+ mice (supplemental Table S2). Bhmt+/− had plasma cysteine concentrations between those of Bhmt+/+ and Bhmt−/− mice.
TABLE 2.
Organ | Metabolites | Bhmt+/+ | Bhmt−/− |
---|---|---|---|
Liver | AdoMet (nmol/g tissue) | 76.4 ± 3.7 | 43.5 ± 5.7a |
AdoHcy (nmol/g tissue) | 21.8 ± 1.7 | 54.4 ± 7.7a | |
AdoMet:AdoHcy | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1a | |
tHomocysteine (nmol/g tissue) | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 26.5 ± 5.5a | |
Methionine (nmol/g tissue) | 223 ± 26 | 242 ± 23 | |
Dimethylglycine (nmol/g tissue) | 48.2 ± 19.0 | 2.2 ± 0.2a | |
Methylglycine (nmol/g tissue) | 20.2 ± 8.9 | 52.7 ± 12.2b | |
Cystathionine (nmol/g tissue) | 32.0 ± 15.7 | 20.3 ± 5.8 | |
Cysteine (nmol/g tissue) | 247 ± 25 | 291 ± 25 | |
Glycine (nmol/g tissue) | 1,659 ± 128 | 1,561 ± 135 | |
Plasma | tHomocysteine (μm) | 6.5 ± 0.7 | 50.8 ± 5.9a |
Cysteine (μm) | 131.1 ± 9.9 | 68.4 ± 9.3a | |
tFolate (ng/ml) | 81.7 ± 6.4 | 52.8 ± 5.1a |
a p < 0.01, different from Bhmt+/+ by Student's t test.
b p < 0.05, different from Bhmt+/+ by Student's t test.
Bhmt Deletion Resulted in Altered Activities of Enzymes Involved in One-carbon Metabolism
Because Bhmt−/− mice (but not Bhmt+/− mice) had altered one-carbon metabolites, enzymes involved in one-carbon metabolism were measured in Bhmt+/+ and Bhmt−/− mouse liver. Complete deletion of Bhmt resulted in increased hepatic CHDH (by 1.33-fold; p < 0.05) and GNMT (by 1.13-fold; p < 0.05) activities (Fig. 2). Hepatic PEMT activity was not affected by Bhmt deletion.
Bhmt Deletion Resulted in Increased Hepatic Fat Accumulation and Decreased Phospholipids
At 5 weeks of age, hepatic TAG concentrations were 6.5-fold higher in Bhmt−/− mice than in Bhmt+/+ mice (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3C). Bhmt+/− mice had similar hepatic TAG concentrations compared with that of Bhmt+/+ mice (8.96 ± 1.92 μg/mg of tissue in Bhmt+/−/− versus 11.75 ± 0.99 μg/mg of tissue in Bhmt+/+). The difference in hepatic steatosis between Bhmt+/+ and Bhmt−/− mice was easily visible at the microscopic level (Fig. 3B). Hepatic and plasma phospholipids were measured in Bhmt+/+ and Bhmt−/− mouse liver due to their involvement with hepatic lipid storage and release. Bhmt−/− mice had lower concentrations of phospholipids in liver than Bhmt+/+ mice (Fig. 3A); with a 40% reduction in PtdCho (p < 0.01), and a 60% reduction in PtdIns (p < 0.01). Bhmt−/− mice also had a 31% reduction in plasma concentrations of PtdCho compared with Bhmt+/+ mice (p < 0.01) (Table 1). PtdEth concentrations in liver and plasma were the same for both genotypes. Bhmt−/− mice had a significantly reduced VLDL secretion rate (Fig. 3D).
Bhmt Deletion Resulted in Altered Clinical Analyses
Plasma alanine aminotransferase activity, a measure of liver damage, was modestly increased in Bhmt−/− mice (34.7 ± 4.4 units/liter in Bhmt−/− versus 20.6 ± 4.9 units/liter in Bhmt+/+; p < 0.05) (Table 3). Plasma BUN, creatinine, CK, and LDH, tests of kidney and muscle function, showed no changes in the Bhmt−/− mice. Urine-specific gravity was significantly reduced in Bhmt−/− mice (1.020 ± 0.002 mg/dL in Bhmt−/− versus 1.039 ± 0.005 mg/dL in Bhmt+/+; p < 0.01). Plasma TAG, glucose, NEFA, and β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations did not differ between genotypes. Compared with wild type littermates, Bhmt−/− mice had significantly lower plasma total cholesterol concentrations (by 45%, p < 0.01) and HDL-C (by 38%, p < 0.01). Heterozygous mice had similar plasma ALT, BUN, creatinine, LDH, CK, TAG, glucose, NEFA, and β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations compared with wild type mice (supplemental Table S2). Heterozygous mice had no change in plasma cholesterol and HDL-C concentrations compared with Bhmt+/+ mice.
TABLE 3.
Organ | Clinical markers | Bhmt+/+ | Bhmt−/− |
---|---|---|---|
Plasma | ALT (units/liter) | 20.6 ± 4.9 | 34.7 ± 4.4a |
BUN (mg/dL) | 12.5 ± 0.8 | 13.0 ± 1.8 | |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | <0.1 | <0.1 | |
LDH (units/liter) | 841 ± 67 | 689 ± 80 | |
CK (units/liter) | 741 ± 147 | 511 ± 147 | |
Triacylglycerol (mg/dL) | 60.9 ± 7.7 | 47.2 ± 7.9 | |
Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 57.8 ± 4.3 | 31.6 ± 4.3b | |
HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 45.8 ± 3.2 | 26.7 ± 5.7b | |
Glucose (mg/dL) | 292.5 ± 33.2 | 226.0 ± 15.9 | |
NEFA (mm) | 0.44 ± 0.08 | 0.28 ± 0.07 | |
Hydroxybutyrate (mm) | 0.39 ± 0.08 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | |
Urine | Specific gravity (mg/dL) | 1.039 ± 0.005 | 1.020 ± 0.002b |
a p < 0.05, different from Bhmt+/+ by Student's t test.
b p < 0.01, different from Bhmt+/+ by Student's t test.
Bhmt Deletion Resulted in Preneoplastic, Neoplastic, and Regenerative Lesions in the Mouse Liver
Eleven Bhmt+/+ and 14 Bhmt−/− mice were maintained over the course of a year to determine 1-year survival rates. At time of sacrifice, 64% (9 of 14) of Bhmt−/− mice and 0% (0 of 11) of Bhmt+/+ mice had visible hepatic tumors (Fig. 4A). Tumors observed in Bhmt−/− mice were solitary or multifocal, found in multiple liver lobes. The average liver weight of Bhmt−/− mice was heavier than that of Bhmt+/+ mice (6.22 ± 2.11% BW in Bhmt−/− versus 4.36 ± 0.26% BW in Bhmt+/+; p < 0.001), attributable to tumor mass. A subset of the liver samples (4 of 11 Bhmt+/+ livers, 6 of 9 Bhmt−/− livers with tumors, and 4 of 5 Bhmt−/− livers without tumors) were serial-sectioned entirely, stained with H&E, and send to two veterinary pathologists for diagnosis. Microscopic analysis depicted a series of histological abnormalities from preneoplastic lesions (acidophilic/eosinophilic cell foci) to frank neoplasia visible only in the Bhmt−/− mice (Table 4 and Fig. 4B). Hepatocellular adenomas were found in 30% (3 of 10) of the analyzed Bhmt−/− livers and none were found in the control animals. These benign lesions were represented by single or multiple nodules, sharply demarcated from the surrounding tissues, with a mild to moderate compression border and loss of lobular structure. Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) were found in 50% (5 of 10) of the analyzed Bhmt−/− livers. HCC were represented by nodules of atypical, megalohepatocytes that were vacuolated or contained hyaline droplets. Indicative of malignancy, these lesions were organized in cords that were 5–6 cells wide, had poor or nonexisting interface with the surrounding tissues, and compressed mildly the adjacent normal cords. The portal triads and sinusoids were poorly or nondistinguishable in most of the nodules. Formation of heptocellular adenomas and HCC in Bhmt−/− mice were accompanied by macro- and microvesicular steatosis, and stellate (Ito) cell and/or oval (bililary) cell hyperplasia (Table 4). We did not study Bhmt+/− mouse survival or carcinogenesis.
TABLE 4.
Genotype | Visible tumor | HCA | HCC | Fat accumulation | Cellular alteration | Hyperplasia |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bhmt+/+ | • | • | ||||
Bhmt+/+ | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | ||||||
Bhmt+/+ | ||||||
Bhmt−/− | • | • | • | • | • | |
Bhmt−/− | • | • | • | • | • | |
Bhmt−/− | • | • | • | • | ||
Bhmt−/− | • | • | • | |||
Bhmt−/− | • | • | • | • | ||
Bhmt−/− | • | • | ||||
Bhmt−/− | • | • | • | |||
Bhmt−/− | • | |||||
Bhmt−/− | • | |||||
Bhmt−/− | • |
Bhmt Deletion Resulted in Elevated γ Glutamyltransferase 1 in Livers
γGT1 is a highly sensitive marker of chronic liver disease, neoplasia, and HCC (29). Bhmt−/− mice had hepatic γGT1 concentrations 3.3-fold higher than that of the control mice (0.815 ± 0.049 ng/mg of tissue in Bhmt−/− versus 0.245 ± 0.085 ng/mg of tissue in Bhmt+/+; p < 0.01).
Changes in Choline and One-carbon Metabolites at 5 Weeks Persisted at 1-Year-old Bhmt−/− Mice
Choline deficiency and reduced methylation potential have been hypothesized as mechanisms underlying development of HCC. Compared with wild type mice, Bhmt−/− mice had a 91% reduction in hepatic methylation potential (AdoMet:AdoHcy) compared with Bhmt+/+ mice (p < 0.001) at 1 year (Table 5), which was greater than the 76% reduction seen at 5 weeks of age (Table 2). The reduced methylation potential was due to reduced hepatic AdoMet (by 50%; p < 0.01) and to elevated AdoHcy (by 5.5-fold; p < 0.001) concentrations in Bhmt−/− mice compared with Bhmt+/+ mice. Compared with wild type littermates, Bhmt−/− mice had a 30-fold increase in hepatic betaine, a 73% reduction in GPCho, a 64% reduction in PCho, and an 18.8% reduction in PtdCho concentrations. At 1 year old, Bhmt−/− mice still had an elevated plasma tHcy concentration (by 6.9-fold; p < 0.01), but no longer had decreased plasma cysteine concentration.
TABLE 5.
Organ | Metabolites | Bhmt+/+ | Bhmt−/− |
---|---|---|---|
Liver | AdoMet (nmol/g tissue) | 113.1 ± 14.7 | 56.8 ± 3.9a |
AdoHcy (nmol/g tissue) | 31.9 ± 5.3 | 176.3 ± 22.1a | |
AdoMet:AdoHcy | 4.05 ± 0.65 | 0.35 ± 0.03a | |
Betaine (nmol/g tissue) | 1,158 ± 330 | 34,976 ± 2,700a | |
Choline (nmol/g tissue) | 84 ± 13 | 144 ± 26 | |
GPCho (nmol/g tissue) | 803 ± 121 | 218 ± 21a | |
PC (nmol/g tissue) | 674 ± 90 | 243 ± 59a | |
PtdCho (nmol/g tissue) | 17,317 ± 683 | 14,075 ± 795a | |
Sphingomyelin (nmol/g tissue) | 1,788 ± 127 | 1,976 ± 85 | |
Plasma | tHomocysteine (μm) | 5.5 ± 0.7 | 37.7 ± 8.6a |
Cysteine (μm) | 150.8 ± 17.4 | 134.6 ± 23.1 |
a p < 0.01, different from Bhmt+/+ by Student's t test.
DISCUSSION
To our knowledge, this is the first report of the successful creation of Bhmt−/− mice. Deletion of the Bhmt gene resulted in the complete loss of BHMT activity in liver, the organ where nearly all of activity resides in mice. Heterozygous mice had 53% of the hepatic BHMT activity measured in Bhmt+/+, suggesting that the Bhmt gene is biallelically expressed. Mating pairs of Bhmt+/+, Bhmt+/−, and Bhmt−/− produced offspring with a normal number of pups and evenly distributed genders, suggesting that BHMT is not essential for reproduction. This is interesting because mice in which choline dehydrogenase (Chdh; form betaine from choline, immediately upstream from Bhmt in choline pathway, Fig. 5) was deleted are infertile (30). Fetuses from heterozygous (Bhmt+/−) mating pairs were born at the expected Mendelian ratio; they were viable and survived to at least 1 year of age, suggesting that BHMT is not essential for embryonic development or for the viability of mice.
Although a Bhmt knock-out mouse has not been previously created, when S-(α-carboxybutyl)-dl-homocysteine (CBHcy; a potent and specific inhibitor of BHMT) was administered intraperitoneally to wild type mice (31) or fed to rats (32), it caused an elevation of plasma Hcy concentrations and a reduction in the hepatic AdoMet:AdoHcy ratio. Our current study confirms the finding that inhibiting or ablating flux through BHMT affects one carbon metabolism. The changes are summarized in Fig. 5. As expected, Bhmt−/− mice had significantly higher concentrations of the substrates for this enzyme (betaine and Hcy) in various tissues as compared with Bhmt+/+ mice. Our data show that the transsulfuration and methionine synthase pathways do not have the capacity to remove excess tHcy that accumulates when BHMT is not present, indicating that BHMT has a critical role in Hcy homeostasis. Bhmt−/− mice also had a significant reduction in hepatic dimethylglycine concentrations, one of the products of BHMT. Methionine, the other reaction product, was not affected by the gene deletion, probably because dietary methionine and protein stores of methionine are so large that the loss of BHMT-catalyzed biosynthesis does not alter overall concentrations of this amino acid. However, AdoMet concentration, which is formed from methionine, was reduced in livers of Bhmt−/− mice, whereas AdoHcy concentrations were elevated. AdoMet is used by GNMT to form methylglycine from glycine (33) (Fig. 5). Methylglycine is also formed from dimethylglycine, the product of the BHMT catalyzed reaction. Because Bhmt−/− mice do not accumulate dimethylglycine, the elevated methylglycine observed in Bhmt−/− mice likely comes from the action of GNMT. GNMT is allosterically inhibited by methyl-THF (13), which serves as the methyl donor for methionine synthase, a parallel pathway to BHMT that catalyzes the conversion of Hcy to methionine (9). It is possible that the Bhmt−/− mice rely heavily on the use of methyl-THF to form the needed methionine. Hence, GNMT is released from methyl-THF inhibition, resulting in increased methylglycine, reduced AdoMet and increased AdoHcy concentrations that we observed. This hypothesis is supported by elevated hepatic GNMT activity in Bhmt−/− mice (Fig. 2), as well as the reduction in plasma concentrations of total folate (the predominant form contributing to plasma total folate is methyl-THF) (Table 2). AdoHcy is cleaved by AdoHcy hydrolase, producing Hcy and adenosine. This reaction is reversible and thermodynamically favors the synthesis of AdoHcy (34); this should occur in the presence of the high tHcy concentrations present in the Bhmt−/− mice.
Despite high plasma tHcy concentrations, Bhmt−/− mice had significantly lower plasma cysteine concentrations; we observed no differences in hepatic cysteine concentrations. Normally, high Hcy would be expected to result in increased cystathionine and cysteine concentrations. For example, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase-deficient mice had elevated plasma Hcy, accompanied by elevated plasma cysteine (35). Supplemental betaine has been shown to increase the activity of liver CBS (36), thus the accumulation of this metabolite as well as tHcy in Bhmt−/− mice would be expected to increase concentrations of cysteine. However, AdoMet is an allosteric activator of CBS (37), and we suggest that reduced hepatic AdoMet concentrations inhibit the transsulfuration pathway. The flux of cysteine from liver to plasma must be rapid, perhaps explaining why plasma and not hepatic cysteine concentrations are altered.
Deletion of Bhmt results in a substantial accumulation of betaine in most tissues except testis. Betaine is either used as a methyl donor (which is blocked by Bhmt deletion) or as an osmolyte that regulates cellular volume and fluid balance. The accumulation of betaine in Bhmt−/− mice may affect osmoregulation. Tests of kidney function did not reveal any malfunction (Table 3). However, Bhmt−/− mice had reduced urinary specific gravity compared with that of Bhmt+/+ mice (Table 3), suggesting reduced reabsorption of water by the kidney tubule. This finding is puzzling because high betaine should result in increased reabsorption of water and increased urine osmolality.
Surprisingly, the deletion of Bhmt does not result in accumulation of choline, the precursor of betaine. Choline is either oxidized to form betaine by the enzyme CHDH or it is used to form PtdCho. Because Bhmt−/− mice cannot utilize betaine, we expected to see product inhibition of CHDH resulting in increased choline availability for use in PtdCho synthesis. We observed the opposite, with lower choline and PtdCho concentrations in a number of tissues. Bhmt−/− mice had elevated hepatic expression of Chdh (data not shown) and hepatic CHDH activity (Fig. 2), suggesting that this gene is induced by some factor in Bhmt−/− mice, possibly explaining increased use of choline to form betaine. The regulatory mechanisms for such an effect are not known.
At 5 weeks of age, Bhmt−/− mice developed a fatty liver, and had elevated plasma ALT activity (a measure of hepatic damage). The fatty liver is the result of decreased synthesis of PtdCho, which is essential for the secretion of VLDL from liver (38). These findings are consistent with the literature. Rodents and humans fed a choline-deficient diet develop fatty liver (39, 40), and have elevated plasma ALT activity because choline deficiency induces hepatocytes apoptosis (41). Consistent with these observations in Bhmt−/− mice, others have reported administration of betaine or the induction of BHMT activity prevents fatty liver in Mthfr−/− mice (35), in nonalcoholic fatty liver (42), and in alcohol-induced fatty livers (43, 44) in rodents. Together, these data suggest the importance of BHMT activity in modulating hepatic steatosis. In addition, Bhmt−/− mice had reduced plasma total cholesterol and HDL-C. The role of Bhmt deletion in cholesterol and lipoprotein homeostasis warrants further studies.
At 1 year of age, 64% of Bhmt−/− mice developed hepatic tumors. Histopathology confirmed that these tumors were either hepatocellular adenomas or carcinomas. Even those that did not have visible tumors had a higher incidence of fat accumulation, cellular alteration, and hyperplasia when compared with Bhmt+/+ livers. Histological modifications were accompanied by elevation in γGT1 levels, a highly sensitive marker of HCC. In rodents, choline deficiency results in a higher incidence of spontaneous hepatocellular carcinomas (45). Several mechanisms are suggested for these carcinogenic effects. Choline deficiency increases lipid peroxidation in the liver (46), which is a source of free radicals in the nucleus that could modify DNA and cause carcinogenesis. Choline deficiency perturbs protein kinase C signaling, resulting in altered cell proliferation signals and cell apoptosis and eventually in carcinogenesis (40). Methyl deficiency may also mediate the mechanisms that underlie the etiology of cancers. AdoMet levels control cell growth, and a persistent decrease in AdoMet concentrations leads to the development of HCC as observed in the methionine adenosyltranferase 1A knock-out mouse model (cannot make AdoMet from Met) (48). Methyl deficiency may also alter epigenetic machinery by hypomethylating some genes but paradoxically hypermethylating specific genes (tumor suppressor genes) and consequently increasing the recruitment of methyl-binding proteins to the CpG islands. Consequently, the expression of tumor suppressor genes responsible for DNA repair (BRCA1, hMLH1), cell cycle regulation (p15, p16), carcinogenesis metabolism (GSTP1), hormonal response (RARβ2), apoptosis (DAPK, APAF-1), and cell adherence (CDH1, CDH3) (49–51) are silenced, leading to tumor development. All the above mechanisms are potentially the underlying causes of HCC observed in Bhmt−/− mice because these mice are essentially choline and methyl-group deficient. We plan to investigate each of these hypotheses in ongoing work in our laboratory.
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common type of cancer worldwide (52). In mouse models harboring genetic defects, HCC occurs spontaneously in a very limited number of cases (47). For the first time, we present evidence that Bhmt gene dysfunction links a metabolic defect to spontaneous neoplastic transformation in rodent livers. Bhmt−/− mice model marks the upper boundary for an effect of a lost-of-function gene variant in humans. Our studies in the Bhmt−/− mice suggest that humans with lost-of-function mutation in the BHMT gene may have important consequences, including hyperhomocysteinemia, altered choline metabolites, fatty liver, and hepatocellular carcinomas. It would be interesting to explore whether enhanced BHMT activity would reverse these symptoms.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Corneliu Craciunescu, Dr. Randy Thresher, Dr. Virginia Godfrey, Dr. Arlin Rogers, Dr. Sally Stabler, Dr. Lance Johnson, Dr. Zhong Guo, and Friday Walter for analytic assistance.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants DK55865 and DK36530 (to S. H. Z.) and DK52501 (to T. A. G.).
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Tables S1 and S2.
- BHMT
- betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase
- MS
- methionine synthase
- CBS
- cystathionine-β-synthase
- CγL
- cystathionine-γ-lyase
- PEMT
- phosphatidylethanolamine methyltransferase
- GNMT
- glycine methyltransferase
- CHDH
- choline dehydrogenase
- Hcy
- homocysteine
- AdoMet
- S-adenosylmethionine
- AdoHcy
- S-adenosylhomocysteine
- PtdCho
- phosphatidylcholine
- PtdEth
- phosphatidylethanolamine
- PCho
- phosphocholine
- GPCho
- glycerophosphocholine
- PtdIns
- phosphatidylinositol
- PtdSer
- phosphatidylserine
- BUN
- plasma urea nitrogen
- THF
- tetrahydrofolate
- NEFA
- nonesterified fatty acid
- TAG
- triacylglycerol
- LDH
- lactate dehydrogenase
- ALT
- alanine transaminase
- CK
- creatinine kinase
- HDL-C
- high density lipoprotein cholesterol
- VLDL
- very low density lipoprotein
- γGT1
- γ-glutamyltransferase 1
- HCC
- hepatocellular carcinoma.
REFERENCES
- 1. Feng Q., Kalari K., Fridley B. L., Jenkins G., Ji Y., Abo R., Hebbring S., Zhang J., Nye M. D., Leeder J. S., Weinshilboum R. M. (2011) Mol. Genet. Metab. 102, 126–133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. da Costa K. A., Kozyreva O. G., Song J., Galanko J. A., Fischer L. M., Zeisel S. H. (2006) FASEB J. 20, 1336–1344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Boyles A. L., Billups A. V., Deak K. L., Siegel D. G., Mehltretter L., Slifer S. H., Bassuk A. G., Kessler J. A., Reed M. C., Nijhout H. F., George T. M., Enterline D. S., Gilbert J. R., Speer M. C. (2006) Environ. Health Perspect. 114, 1547–1552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Weisberg I. S., Park E., Ballman K. V., Berger P., Nunn M., Suh D. S., Breksa A. P., 3rd, Garrow T. A., Rozen R. (2003) Atherosclerosis 167, 205–214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Xu X., Gammon M. D., Zeisel S. H., Bradshaw P. T., Wetmur J. G., Teitelbaum S. L., Neugut A. I., Santella R. M., Chen J. (2009) FASEB J. 23, 4022–4028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Szegedi S. S., Castro C. C., Koutmos M., Garrow T. A. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 8939–8945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zeisel S. H. (2006) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 26, 229–250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pajares M. A., Pérez-Sala D. (2006) Cell Mol. Life Sci. 63, 2792–2803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Selhub J. (1999) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 19, 217–246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Delgado-Reyes C. V., Wallig M. A., Garrow T. A. (2001) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 393, 184–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Garrow T. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22831–22838 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Grossman E. B., Herbert S. C. (1989) Am. J. Physiol. 256, F107–F112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wagner C., Briggs W. T., Cook R. J. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 127, 746–752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ridgway N. D., Vance D. E. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 16864–16871 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ridgway N. D., Vance D. E. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 16856–16863 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bradford M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Koc H., Mar M. H., Ranasinghe A., Swenberg J. A., Zeisel S. H. (2002) Anal. Chem. 74, 4734–4740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Shivapurkar N., Poirier L. A. (1983) Carcinogenesis 4, 1051–1057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Molloy A. M., Weir D. G., Kennedy G., Kennedy S., Scott J. M. (1990) Biomed. Chromatogr. 4, 257–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ubbink J. B., Hayward Vermaak W. J., Bissbort S. (1991) J. Chromatogr. 565, 441–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Stabler S. P., Sekhar J., Allen R. H., O'Neill H. C., White C. W. (2009) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 47, 1147–1153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Horne D. W., Patterson D. (1988) Clin. Chem. 34, 2357–2359 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bligh E. G., Dyer W. J. (1959) Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 911–917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Watkins S. M., Lin T. Y., Davis R. M., Ching J. R., DePeters E. J., Halpern G. M., Walzem R. L., German J. B. (2001) Lipids 36, 247–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Svanborg A., Svennerholm L. (1961) Acta Med. Scand. 169, 43–49 [Google Scholar]
- 26. Folch J., Lees M., Sloane Stanley G. H. (1957) J. Biol. Chem. 226, 497–509 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lillie R. (1965) Histopathologic Technic and Practical Histochemistry, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lowry O. H., Rosebrough N. J., Farr A. L., Randall R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhou L., Liu J., Luo F. (2006) World J. Gastroenterol. 12, 1175–1181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Johnson A. R., Craciunescu C. N., Guo Z., Teng Y. W., Thresher R. J., Blusztajn J. K., Zeisel S. H. (2010) FASEB J. 24, 2752–2761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Collinsova M., Strakova J., Jiracek J., Garrow T. A. (2006) J. Nutr. 136, 1493–1497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Strakova J., Williams K. T., Gupta S., Schalinske K. L., Kruger W. D., Rozen R., Jiracek J., Li L., Garrow T. A. (2010) Nutr. Res. 30, 492–500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Blumenstein J., Williams G. R. (1963) Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 41, 201–210 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Finkelstein J. D. (1990) J. Nutr. Biochem. 1, 228–237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Schwahn B. C., Chen Z., Laryea M. D., Wendel U., Lussier-Cacan S., Genest J., Jr., Mar M. H., Zeisel S. H., Castro C., Garrow T., Rozen R. (2003) FASEB J. 17, 512–514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kim S. K., Choi K. H., Kim Y. C. (2003) Biochem. Pharmacol. 65, 1565–1574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Prudova A., Bauman Z., Braun A., Vitvitsky V., Lu S. C., Banerjee R. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 6489–6494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Noga A. A., Zhao Y., Vance D. E. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 42358–42365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Fischer L. M., daCosta K. A., Kwock L., Stewart P. W., Lu T. S., Stabler S. P., Allen R. H., Zeisel S. H. (2007) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 85, 1275–1285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. da Costa K. A., Cochary E. F., Blusztajn J. K., Garner S. C., Zeisel S. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2100–2105 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. da Costa K. A., Badea M., Fischer L. M., Zeisel S. H. (2004) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 80, 163–170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Kwon do Y., Jung Y. S., Kim S. J., Park H. K., Park J. H., Kim Y. C. (2009) J. Nutr. 139, 63–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Barak A. J., Beckenhauer H. C., Junnila M., Tuma D. J. (1993) Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 17, 552–555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kharbanda K. K., Mailliard M. E., Baldwin C. R., Beckenhauer H. C., Sorrell M. F., Tuma D. J. (2007) J. Hepatol. 46, 314–321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Newberne P. M., Rogers A. E. (1986) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 6, 407–432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Rushmore T. H., Lim Y. P., Farber E., Ghoshal A. K. (1984) Cancer Lett. 24, 251–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Newell P., Villanueva A., Friedman S. L., Koike K., Llovet J. M. (2008) J. Hepatol. 48, 858–879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Lu S. C., Mato J. M. (2008) J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 23, Suppl. 1, S73–77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Costello J. F., Plass C. (2001) J. Med. Genet. 38, 285–303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Esteller M. (2002) Oncogene 21, 5427–5440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Momparler R. L. (2003) Oncogene 22, 6479–6483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Feo F., De Miglio M. R., Simile M. M., Muroni M. R., Calvisi D. F., Frau M., Pascale R. M. (2006) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1765, 126–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.