Genomic and Experimental Evidence Suggests that Verrucomicrobium spinosum Interacts with Eukaryotes

Abstract

Our knowledge of pathogens and symbionts is heavily biased toward phyla containing species that are straightforward to isolate in pure culture. Novel bacterial phyla are often represented by a handful of strains, and the number of species interacting with eukaryotes is likely underestimated. Identification of predicted pathogenesis and symbiosis determinants such as the Type III Secretion System (T3SS) in the genomes of “free-living” bacteria suggests that these microbes participate in uncharacterized interactions with eukaryotes. Our study aimed to test this hypothesis on Verrucomicrobium spinosum (phylum Verrucomicrobia) and to begin characterization of its predicted T3SS. We showed the putative T3SS structural genes to be transcriptionally active, and that expression of predicted effector proteins was toxic to yeast in an established functional screen. Our results suggest that the predicted T3SS genes of V. spinosum could encode a functional T3SS, although further work is needed to determine whether V. spinosum produces a T3SS injectisome that delivers the predicted effectors. In the absence of a known eukaryotic host, we made use of invertebrate infection models. The injection or feeding of V. spinosum to Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, respectively, was shown to result in increased mortality rates relative to controls, a phenomenon exaggerated in C. elegans mutants hypersensitive to pathogen infection. This finding, although not conclusively demonstrating pathogenesis, suggests that V. spinosum is capable of pathogenic activity toward an invertebrate host. Symbiotic interactions with a natural host provide an alternative explanation for the results seen in the invertebrate models. Further work is needed to determine whether V. spinosum can establish and maintain interactions with eukaryotic species found in its natural habitat, and whether the predicted T3SS is directly involved in pathogenic or symbiotic activity.

Introduction

For anthropocentric reasons, bacteria are often conceptually divided into free-living and host-associated organisms. However, we know that different members of the same bacterial phylum can exhibit a multitude of lifestyles (free-living, pathogen, symbiont), and even that a single species can engage in different kinds of relationships with different hosts. It is also clear that bacterial phyla containing known pathogens and symbionts are enormously over-represented in our culture collections and sequence databases (Martiny and Field, 2005), whereas our knowledge of many novel phyla is limited to a handful of strains. The relatively obscure bacterium Verrucomicrobium spinosum (phylum Verrucomicrobia) was isolated from a lake in northern Germany (Schlesner, 1987), and its most interesting feature until now has been its unusual cellular morphology, featuring wart-like cellular protrusions (Schlesner, 1987) and a compartmentalized cell plan shared with the planctomycetes (Lee et al., 2009). For two decades, V. spinosum has been regarded as a free-living, non-pathogenic microbe, but its genome sequence contains a predicted Type III secretion system (T3SS; Pallen et al., 2005). T3SS is a hallmark of bacteria–eukaryote interactions, chiefly known for its role as a pathogenesis factor, delivering toxic effector proteins via direct cell-to-cell contact with eukaryotic cells, but also involved in symbioses (Galán and Wolf-Watz, 2006). It has been suggested that “free-living” organisms possessing predicted T3SS may participate in uncharacterized interactions with eukaryotes (Pallen et al., 2005). Our study aimed to test this hypothesis on Verrucomicrobium spinosum and to begin characterization of its predicted T3SS. We achieved our aims by generating experimental data on the transcriptional activity and protein–protein interactions of T3SS genes and their gene products, respectively. We also demonstrated that V. spinosum can kill two different model invertebrate hosts.

Results

V. spinosum possesses and expresses predicted type III secretion system genes

The V. spinosum genome contains all required structural components for a functional T3SS (Figure 1; Table A1 in Appendix). The V. spinosum T3SS genes are found in a cluster with strikingly similar organization to other T3SS gene clusters, particularly the well-characterized T3SS found in Yersinia species, and the T3SS of desulfovibrios and related organisms (Heidelberg et al., 2004; Pallen et al., 2005). All essential categories of T3SS structural proteins were identified, including membrane anchors (VspC, VspQ), candidate needle proteins (VspF1, VspF2), needle protein chaperones (VspE, VspG), and an ATPase (VspN; Table A1 in Appendix). Importantly, we found that several of these genes were actively transcribed. Transcription of predicted outer and inner bacterial membrane anchors of the T3SS, and candidate needle proteins, was detected by RT-PCR (Figure 2) under standard growth conditions (described in Materials and Methods). Furthermore, specialized cytoplasmic chaperones are usually required for the stability of the T3SS, and the efficient translocation of T3SS components and effectors (Galán and Wolf-Watz, 2006). We demonstrated a physical association between one needle protein (VspF1) and one chaperone (VspE; Table A2 in Appendix) by yeast two-hybrid screening, thus supporting a functional interaction.

Figure 1.

Verrucomicrobium spinosum possesses genes predicted to encode a T3SS. (A) General organization of T3SS structural components in experimentally characterized T3SS, labeled according to the Yersinia T3SS nomenclature. (B) Organization of predicted T3SS structural genes in the genomes of V. spinosum, Desulfovibrio vulgaris, Lawsonia intracellularis, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae. The latter is included because the chlamydiae are generally considered to be more phylogenetically related to the Verrucomicrobia than other phyla. Genes are colored to correspond to the protein components depicted in part (A) of the figure. Double vertical lines indicate that the T3SS genes are not immediately adjacent to each other in the respective genomes.

Figure 2.

Detection of VspC, VspQ, VspF1, and VspF2 expression by RT-PCR. Lane 1: V. spinosum RNA in the presence of reverse transcriptase and DNA polymerase; Lane 2: water (PCR negative control); Lane 3: V. spinosum RNA in the absence of reverse transcriptase and presence of DNA polymerase; Lane 4: V. spinosum DNA in the absence of reverse transcriptase and presence of DNA polymerase.

Expression of predicted V. spinosum T3SS effector proteins suppresses growth of yeast

We next used a yeast functional screen (Lesser and Miller, 2001) to experimentally confirm the toxicity of predicted T3SS effector proteins from V. spinosum. Expression of T3SS effectors, but not other bacterial proteins, causes growth inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Lesser and Miller, 2001; Slagowski et al., 2008). We identified three candidate effectors, based on their proximity to the T3SS structural gene cluster, sequence similarity to known T3SS effectors, and/or sequence properties reported to be characteristic of T3SS effectors (Schechter et al., 2006). Two of these, open reading frame (ORF) 05930 (p = 7.9 e 10⁻¹⁷; t-test) and ORF04374 (p = 3.3 e 10⁻⁷; t-test), showed a significant inhibition of growth under inducing conditions (Figure 3). Expression of control V. spinosum genes showed no such effect. While we have not directly demonstrated that the predicted T3SS secretes these predicted effectors, our data suggest that injection of these effectors into eukaryotic cells would be toxic, similar to other known T3SS effectors.

Figure 3.

Optical density of yeast cultures expressing putative effector genes (on right) and negative control genes (on left). Vertical bar represents distribution of values for 12 individual clones repeated in duplicate. *p = 7.9 e⁻¹⁷ (ORF05930, t-test) and 3.3 e10⁻⁷ (ORF04374, t-test).

V. spinosum increases mortality of D. melanogaster

We next performed standard infection assays (Schneider et al., 2007) with V. spinosum in Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila is an established model organism for examining T3SS-mediated pathogenesis (Brandt et al., 2004). Although non-pathogenic bacteria can elicit an immune response when injected into D. melanogaster (Lemaitre et al., 1997), they have no effect on fly mortality (Schneider et al., 2007). Wild-type (Oregon R) flies infected with V. spinosum died more quickly than flies injected with buffer alone (Figure 4), with approximately 40% survival after 20 days, compared to 85% survival for negative control buffer-injected flies (p = <1.0 × 10⁻⁴). A similar effect observed using wild-type Salmonella typhimurium was shown to be dependent on the T3SS (Brandt et al., 2004).

Figure 4.

Drosophila melanogaster survival assays for V. spinosum (squares) and PBS negative control (diamonds). Each experiment comprised 100 male wild-type Oregon R flies. Infected flies died faster than control flies according to log-rank analysis (p < 0.0001).

V. spinosum increases mortality of C. elegans

We also examined the effect of V. spinosum exposure on the mortality of Caenorhabditis elegans. Sterile mutant worms [fer-15(b26); fem-1(hc17)] exposed to living V. spinosum exhibited increased mortality relative to control worms feeding on Escherichia coli (Figure 5A), whereas heat-killed V. spinosum cells had no such effect (Figure A1A in Appendix). This suggested a direct and adverse interaction between living V. spinosum and the worm rather than a non-specific mortality increase due to provision of a nutritionally inferior diet or similar non-specific effect. V. spinosum-induced mortality was increased (Figure 5B) in a worm deletion mutant [fshr-1(ok778)] previously shown to be hypersensitive to pathogen infection by multiple agents (Powell et al., 2009). Using a multi-copy extrachromosomal array that overexpresses fshr-1 (Cho et al., 2007), we were able to completely reverse V. spinosum-associated death in fshr-1(ok778) mutants (Figure 5B). In fact, overexpression of fshr-1 substantially reduced mortality of fshr-1(ok778) mutants exposed to V. spinosum to levels below that observed for wild-type, similar to our observations with the known pathogens, S. aureus, and E. faecalis (Figures A1B,C in Appendix). In contrast, fshr-1 expression levels do not correlate to life expectancy on a non-pathogenic strain (Figure A1D in Appendix), indicating that the effects of fshr-1 on survival are specific to pathogen exposure (Powell et al., 2009).

Figure 5.

Caenorhabditis elegans survival assays. Each experiment comprised of approximately 100 worms. (A) CF512 worms (sterile mutants) exposed to E. faecalis and V. spinosum died faster than CF512 worms exposed to E. coli, according to log-rank analysis (p = 0 for E. faecalis and 2.33e⁻¹⁵ for V. spinosum). (B) When exposed to V. spinosum, worm mutants hypersensitive to pathogens (fshr-1) died faster than N2 wild-type worms (p = 5.04 e⁻⁷). Worms over-expressing an fshr-1 multi-copy array died more slowly than N2 wild-type worms (p = 7.18 e⁻¹³).

Can we predict the natural eukaryotic host of V. spinosum?

Phylogenetic analysis of structural T3SS proteins has shown most bacteria possessing T3SS to cluster according to their specific interaction type, such as plant pathogen, obligate intracellular animal pathogen, or extracellular animal pathogen (Troisfontaines and Cornelis, 2005). In an attempt to predict the nature of any uncharacterized V. spinosum–eukaryote interaction, we conducted phylogenetic analysis of YscN-like sequences (the T3SS ATPase from Yersinia) from V. spinosum, all available free-living bacteria carrying predicted T3SS genes, and reference pathogens and symbionts (Figure 6). The V. spinosum YscN appeared most closely related to those from strains of three deltaproteobacteria: Lawsonia intracellularis, Desulfovibrio piger and Desulfovibrio vulgaris. This cluster was recovered with analysis of some, but not all, additional T3SS genes (data not shown). L. intracellularis is an obligate intracellular pathogen and causes proliferative enteritis in pigs (Kroll et al., 2005). Members of the genus Desulfovibrio are anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacteria and include both commensals and pathogens of the human gastrointestinal tract (Gibson et al., 1990, 1991; Willis et al., 1997; Zinkevich and Beech, 2000; Loubinoux et al., 2002; Goldstein et al., 2003), as well as free-living environmental bacteria. Specifically, strains of D. piger and D. vulgaris are human intestinal commensals and D. piger also acts as an occasional human opportunistic pathogen. Genes predicted to encode T3SS in the L. intracellularis and D. vulgaris genomes have been described previously (Heidelberg et al., 2004; Pallen et al., 2005), and the T3SS of L. intracellularis has recently been linked to pathogenesis in the porcine host (Alberdi et al., 2009). There are no reports of infection of invertebrate models with these organisms, so it is not clear whether their host range could extend to invertebrates.

Figure 6.

Phylogenetic relationship of T3SS ATPases from V. spinosum and representatives of other bacterial groups containing T3SS; the ATPase group associated with the flagellar apparatus was used as an outgroup. Bootstrap values obtained based on 1000 bootstrap runs are indicated by: O above 80%, Δ between 80 and 60%; values less than 60% are not shown. Bar denotes 0.3 amino acid substitutions per site. Collapsed clades indicate T3SS classes as described by Troisfontaines and Cornelis (2005). Hrc1 and Hrc2 plant pathogen groups; intracellular survival; invasive phenotype; Chlamydiales T3SS family (intracellular life-style); extracellular pathogen life-style, resistance to phagocytosis, and triggering of apoptosis in macrophages; Rhizobiales T3SS family (symbiotic relations with leguminous plants). Open clusters contain at least one “free-living” organism.

Discussion

We have begun to address two questions, using Verrucomicrobium spinosum as a test case. The first question is whether predicted T3SS genes without established function in “free-living” bacteria have the potential to encode a functional T3SS, i.e., an injectisome that translocates effector proteins into a eukaryotic host cell. Our results showed that the predicted T3SS genes of V. spinosum are transcriptionally active and identify a candidate chaperone for one of two predicted T3SS needle proteins. We also demonstrated that expression of V. spinosum proteins inhibits growth in an established yeast functional screen for T3SS effectors. Although the growth inhibition appears modest (Figure 3), use of this screen with characterized virulence proteins from a known pathogen (Shigella flexneri) showed that growth inhibition was variable (up to 50% compared to controls; Slagowski et al., 2008). Thus the 50% growth inhibition observed for V. spinosum ORF05930 corresponded to the most toxic protein screen result from S. flexneri. These findings represent only first steps toward characterizing the putative V. spinosum T3SS. Future work includes determining whether T3SS genes are expressed at the protein level, whether the resulting proteins assemble to form an injectisome, and whether the injectisome translocates the predicted effectors into a host cell. It will also be necessary to pursue approaches complementary to yeast two-hybrid screens to characterize chaperone interactions, as it is possible that the very nature of chaperones leads them to interact non-specifically with poorly folded proteins.

The second question is whether V. spinosum can interact with eukaryotes. The results of our infection studies in two different model invertebrates suggest that it can. In particular, the increased mortality of C. elegans fshr-1 deletion mutants exposed to V. spinosum, relative to wild-type worms, strongly argues for a pathogenic interaction in this model. However, we cannot presently extrapolate this result to the natural host(s) of V. spinosum, given that mechanisms of bacterial pathogenesis (e.g., T3SS) are also used to initiate and maintain symbiotic relationships (Viprey et al., 1998), and that a given bacterium can engage in pathogenic and symbiotic interactions with different hosts (Preston, 2007). A symbiotic relationship also appears plausible given the known symbiotic associations of other verrucomicrobial species, such as Candidatus Xiphinematobacter with nematodes (Vandekerckhove et al., 2000), and the verrucomicrobial ectosymbiont that defends its ciliate host from predation (Petroni et al., 2000). In addition, a verrucomicrobial species occurs as a dominant member of the mucin-degrading bacterial population of the human intestine (Derrien et al., 2004). Future work includes determining the natural host range of V. spinosum, and the nature and route of the host interaction. This is a challenging goal given the many possible host taxa. However, our phylogenetic analysis of the V. spinosum T3SS proteins suggests that they are related to those found within Desulfovibrio and relatives, a group that includes known intestinal pathogens of vertebrates, as well as free-living strains. This suggests a number of possible avenues: to test vertebrate hosts for susceptibility to V. spinosum infection, and to test ingestion as an infection route in both vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. Interestingly, the role of FSHR-1 in pathogen defense in C. elegans is specific to the intestinal tract (Powell et al., 2009), consistent with V. spinosum acting through this tissue.

Another obvious goal is determination of the role of the predicted V. spinosum T3SS in the mortality observed in invertebrate infection models. The major hurdle to this work is that the development of genetic tools for V. spinosum is still in its infancy. Although a method for random transposon mutagenesis of the V. spinosum genome has been recently described (Domman et al., 2011), work is still underway to increase transformation efficiency so that mutant libraries of adequate size can be generated. In addition, neither transformation of V. spinosum cells with plasmid DNA nor targeted knock-out of specific genes via transposon mutagenesis has yet been achieved. With further progress in development of genetic tools for V. spinosum, it should also be possible to generate tagged V. spinosum mutants useful for fulfilling Koch’s postulates (i.e., recovering the presumed pathogen/symbiont from the host) and determining whether the organism colonizes host tissue in the invertebrate infection models. In the absence of a selectable marker or fluorescent tag, it has proven difficult to quantify V. spinosum in worm or fly tissue due to overgrowth with normal fly/worm flora on artificial culture media. This question could also be pursued with FISH probing of host tissues with a V. spinosum-specific probe. An alternative, or complementary approach, to determining whether the putative V. spinosum T3SS is responsible for the observed invertebrate mortality would be to test for up-regulation of the relevant genes in the D. melanogaster or C. elegans infection models.

With the rapid development of sequencing technology, bacterial genome sequencing has revealed predicted pathogenesis/symbiosis determinants in several organisms not previously known to interact with eukaryotes (Pallen et al., 2005). Further examination of unpublished but publicly available genome sequences reveals the presence of such determinants in multiple other “free-living” genomes (http://img.jgi.doe.gov/cgi-bin/pub/main.cgi). Here we map out a general methodology moving from bioinformatics to experimental analysis, taking advantage of established eukaryotic models from yeast to flies and worms to test the potential eukaryotic interactions of bacterial strains.

Materials and Methods

Bioinformatic predictions and phylogenetic analysis

The V. spinosum genome sequence (accession ABIZ00000000) and the sequences of reference genomes were obtained from GenBank. Protein structure was predicted using the Phyre server (Kelley and Sternberg, 2009). Protein sequences of the T3SS ATPase (YscN) were identified using BLASTP (Altschul et al., 1990). The ATP synthase of E. coli associated with the flagellar apparatus was included in the analysis as an outgroup. Protein sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004) with default parameters. The WAG + I + GAMMA model (Whelan and Goldman, 2001) was determined as the model of best fit [according to AIC (Sugiura, 1978)] using the ProtTest tool (Abascal et al., 2005) with default parameters. Maximum likelihood phylogeny was obtained using PhyML software (Guindon and Gascuel, 2003) implementing the WAG + I + GAMMA evolutionary model, with 1000 bootstrap runs.

Bacterial strains and cultivation conditions

Verrucomicrobium spinosum type strain DSM 4136 was grown in liquid M13 medium (Schlesner, 1987) incubated statically at 30°C for 72 h.

RNA isolation and RT-PCR

Ten milliliters of V. spinosum culture was collected by centrifugation and frozen at −80°C for 5 min. Cells were thawed, 250 μl TriZol reagent was added, and RNA isolation performed as recommended by the manufacturer. Pellets were re-suspended and incubated for 15 min at 55°C in 100 μl RNase-free water, DNase-treated, and subsequently passed through an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-rad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR targeting VspC (ORF05910), VspQ (ORF05897), VspF1 (ORF05907), and VspF2 (ORF05908) was performed using V. spinosum cDNA or gDNA as the nucleic acid template. Reaction mixtures consisted of 1 × PCR buffer (NEB), 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 10 μM each primer (Table A3 in Appendix), 200 μM each dNTP, 0.2 U Taq DNA polymerase, 30 ng of cDNA in a 50-μl volume. Reaction conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step of 95°C for 3 min followed by 35 repeat cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 62°C for 10 s, and 72°C for 20 s, and a single final extension step at 72°C for 5 min.

Yeast two-hybrid screens

Open reading frames were PCR-amplified from V. spinosum genomic DNA (gDNA). PCR was performed in a mixture of 1 × iProof High-Fidelity DNA polymerase PCR reaction mix (Bio-Rad), 25 μM each primer, and approximately 30 ng of V. spinosum gDNA in a final volume of 50 μl. Reaction conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step of 98°C for 30 s followed by 30 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 54–60°C (see Table A3 in Appendix for primer sequences and annealing temperatures) for 10 s and 72°C for 1 min, followed by a single final extension step of 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were gel-purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen), and cloned into pENTR/SD/D-TOPO (Invitrogen). E. coli NEB5α chemically competent cells (NEB) were transformed with the resulting constructs to generate entry clones. Correct sequence and orientation of each ORF was confirmed by DNA sequencing of entry clones. ORF’s were transferred to pDEST22 (Prey) and pDEST32 (Bait) vectors (Invitrogen) by LR recombination and specific protein–protein interactions were tested using the ProQuest Two-Hybrid System (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Yeast T3SS effector screen

Putative T3SS effectors were selected for yeast genetic screening (Lesser and Miller, 2001) if they showed high BLASTP similarity to known T3SS effectors in other organisms, or if they yielded high scores in criteria for T3SS effectors described previously (Schechter et al., 2006). PCR primers were designed to incorporate a yeast translation initiation sequence at the 5′ end of the ORF and the stop codon was removed to allow fusion with a V5 epitope and polyhistidine tag. Putative T3SS effectors (ORF01842, ORF04374, ORF05930) and controls (ORF03840, ORF04373, ORF05921) were amplified by PCR. PCR contained 1 × ReadyMix PCR reaction mix (Sigma), 25 μM each primer (Table A3 in Appendix), 30 ng V. spinosum gDNA, 3% (v/v) DMSO, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, and reaction conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step of 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 56°C for 15 s and 72°C for 1 min, and a single final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were gel-purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen), cloned into pYES2.1 TOPO (Invitrogen). E. coli TOP10 chemically competent cells (Invitrogen) were transformed with the resulting constructs according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Correct sequence and orientation of each ORF was confirmed by DNA sequencing. Plasmids were extracted from 5 ml E. coli TOP10 using the QiaQuick plasmid miniprep kit (Qiagen). S. cerevisiae str. InvSc1 (Invitrogen) was transformed with approximately 1 μg plasmid mixed with 100 μg salmon sperm DNA, using a lithium acetate transformation protocol described by the manufacturer. Resulting transformants containing expression plasmids were selected by growth on SM-Ura media.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae InvSc1 clones containing expression plasmids were grown in 5 ml non-inducing media (SM-ura + glucose) until culture had an OD₆₀₀ of approximately 1.0. Cultures were normalized and inoculated into induction media (SM-ura + galactose) so that an OD₆₀₀ of 0.05 was obtained. Tubes were incubated for 48 h at 30°C and the OD₆₀₀ recorded. The final OD₆₀₀ recorded was the average of two replicate cultures of 12 individual clones for each putative T3SS effector or control.

Fly experiments

Survival assays in D. melanogaster were performed as previously described (Schneider et al., 2007). 60–100 wild-type male Oregon R flies were assayed per condition. Flies were infected with either V. spinosum [concentrated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to an OD₆₀₀ of 1.0] or PBS alone and incubated at 29°C. Death was recorded daily. Survival curves are plotted as Kaplan–Meier plots and statistical significance tested using log-rank analysis using GraphPad Prism software. All experiments were performed at least three times and yielded similar results.

Worm experiments

Strains were maintained according to standard procedures (Stiernagle, 2006) and cultured at 20°C, with the exception of experiments conducted with CF512; such experiments were performed at 25°C. Strains used or generated included the following: N2, wild-type; CF512, [fer-15(b26); fem-1(hc17)]; WY346, [fshr-1(ok778)]; WY335, [fshr-1(ok778); fdEx41] (this multi-copy extrachromosomal array contains the wild-type fshr-1 locus as well as a sur-5::GFP marker; Cho et al., 2007). Bacterial killing assays were performed at 20°C, unless otherwise noted, as previously described (Powell and Ausubel, 2007). V. spinosum was cultivated in liquid M13 medium as described above, while E. coli, S. aureus, and E. faecalis were cultivated in tryptic soy broth at 37°C. After concentration of bacterial cultures by centrifugation, all bacterial strains were applied to NGM plates (Stiernagle, 2006) for the killing assays. Log-rank analysis was used to calculate mean survival for each population of worms, using the online server at http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/russell/logrank/. Each population (biological replicate) was an average of two or three independent plates containing 50 worms each. Figures show data from representative biological replicates.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Appendix

Table A1.

Type III Secretion System structural genes and chaperones in the V. spinosum genome, predicted on the basis of primary sequence similarity (BLASTP comparison) and domain structure.

Open reading frame	Description	Top BLASTP match	Required for type III secretion?
ORF02659	Type III secretion chaperone DspF family	ZP_02197308.1 Vibrio campbellii AND4 hypothetical protein [Identities = 38/136 (27%), Positives = 57/136 (41%), Gaps = 0/136 (0%)] (4e-06)	No
ORF02982	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	YP_002436649.1 Desulfovibrio vulgaris str. “Miyazaki F” Tir chaperone family protein [Identities = 41/138 (29%), Positives = 59/138 (42%), Gaps = 3/138 (2%)] (2e-08)	No
ORF03096	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	YP_002436233.1 Desulfovibrio vulgaris str. “Miyazaki F” Tir chaperone family [Identities = 43/139 (30%), Positives = 70/139 (50%), Gaps = 7/139 (5%)] (5e-07)	No
ORF03208	Type III secretion chaperone, CesT family	ZP_03311875.1 Desulfovibrio piger ATCC 29098 hypothetical protein [Identities = 36/119 (30%), Positives = 58/119 (48%), Gaps = 4/119 (3%)] (5e-05)	No
ORF04373	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	YP_002680810.1 Pseudovibrio sp. JE062 type III secretion chaperone, CesT family [Identities = 33/123 (26%), Positives = 50/123 (40%), Gaps = 8/123 (6%)] (0.081)	No
ORF04377	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	YP_002680810.1 Pseudovibrio sp. JE062 type III secretion chaperone, CesT family [Identities = 40/144 (27%), Positives = 57/144 (39%), Gaps = 7/144 (4%)] (0.007)	No
ORF04807	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	gb|AAY36239.1| Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a type III chaperone protein ShcM [Identities = 29/111 (26%), Positives = 50/111 (45%), Gaps = 9/111 (8%)] (0.002)	No
ORF05889	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	ZP_02197308.1 Vibrio campbellii AND4 hypothetical protein AND4_08621 [Identities = 37/129 (28%), Positives = 66/129 (51%), Gaps = 0/129 (0%)] (5e-10)	No
ORF05893	Type III secretion protein YscU/HrpY	ZP_01259729.1 Vibrio alginolyticus translocation protein in type III secretion [Identities = 155/339 (45%), Positives = 237/339 (69%), Gaps = 0/339 (0%; 9e-97)	Yes
ORF05894	Type III secretion protein SpaR/YscT/HrcT	NP_798053.1 Vibrio parahaemolyticus type III secretion apparatus protein SpaR/YscT/HrcT [Identities = 106/237 (44%), Positives = 155/237 (65%), Gaps = 3/237 (1%)] (6e-50)	Yes
ORF05895	Type III secretion protein HrpO family (YscS/HrcS/SctS/EscS)	ZP_01550017.1 Stappia aggregata Type III secretory pathway, component EscS [Identities = 48/89 (53%), Positives = 67/89 (75%), Gaps = 0/89 (0%)] (2e-20)	Yes
ORF05896	Type III secretion apparatus protein YscR/HrcR	ZP_02195905.1 Vibrio campbellii translocation protein in type III secretion [Identities = 133/215 (61%), Positives = 170/215 (79%), Gaps = 0/215 (0%)] (4e-70)	Yes
ORF05897	Type III secretion apparatus protein YscQ/HrcQ/SpaO	YP_001444923.1 Vibrio harveyi ATCC BAA-1116 type III secretion system protein [Identities = 86/293 (29%), Positives = 131/293 (44%), Gaps = 25/293 (8%)] (1e-15)	Yes
ORF05898	Putative T3SS needle length determinant	YP_436215.1 Hahella chejuensis KCTC 2396 hypothetical protein HCH_05109 [Identities = 27/88 (30%), Positives = 51/88 (57%), Gaps = 5/88 (5%)] (4e-05)	No
ORF05899	Type III secretion protein O	ABM29998.1 Desulfovibrio vulgaris spp. vulgaris DP4 type III secretion YscO family protein [Identities = 57/155 (36%), Positives = 88/155 (56%), Gaps = 0/155 (0%)] (8e-11)	No
ORF05900	Type III secretion apparatus H +  transporting two-sector ATPase YscN	YP_594915.1 Lawsonia intracellularis PHE/MN1-00 type III secretion system ATPase [Identities = 307/435 (70%), Positives = 357/435 (82%), Gaps = 0/435 (0%)](4e-179)	Yes
ORF05901	Type III secretion apparatus protein HrpE/YscL family	AAO18079.1 Photorhabdus luminescens LscL [Identities = 65/200 (32%), Positives = 118/200 (59%), Gaps = 11/200 (5%)] (1e-26)	Yes
ORF05904	Type III secretion apparatus lipoprotein YscJ/HrcJ	ZP_01769285.1 Burkholderiapseudomallei 305 type III secretion apparatus lipoprotein, YscJ/HrcJ family [Identities = 101/245 (41%), Positives = 143/245 (58%), Gaps = 17/245 (6%)] (5e-44)	Yes
ORF05909	Type III secretion apparatus protein YscD/HrpQ family	ABC30002.1 Hahella chejuensis KCTC 2396 putative type III export protein YscD [Length = 446 Identities = 83/330 (25%), Positives = 145/330 (43%), Gaps = 24/330 (7%)] (2e-15)	Yes
ORF05910	Type III secretion outer membrane pore YscC/HrcC family	YP_434425.1 Hahella chejuensis KCTC 2396 putative type III secretion [Identities = 179/568 (31%), Positives = 295/568 (51%), Gaps = 40/568 (7%)] (5e-69)	Yes
ORF05911	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	YP_961197.1 Desulfovibrio vulgaris spp. vulgaris DP4 TIR chaperone family protein [Identities = 36/127 (28%), Positives = 63/127 (49%), Gaps = 13/127 (10%)](2.9)	No
ORF05912	Type III secretion protein LcrD/AscV/YscV	NP_863517.1 Yersinia enterocolitica LcrD [Identities = 388/692 (56%), Positives = 537/692 (77%), Gaps = 17/692 (2%)] (0.0)	Yes
ORF05915	Type III secretion chaperone SycN family	ZP_01259739.1 Vibrio alginolyticus 12G01 putative type III secretion protein [Identities = 40/123 (32%), Positives = 61/123 (49%), Gaps = 5/123 (4%)] (2e-04)	No
ORF05917	Type III secretion regulator YopN/LcrE/InvE/MxiC	YP_961203.1 Desulfovibrio vulgaris spp. vulgaris DP4 type III secretion regulator YopN/LcrE/InvE/MxiC [Identities = 93/246 (37%), Positives = 136/246 (55%), Gaps = 18/246 (7%)] (2e-28)	No
ORF05919	Putative Type III secretion system protein EscC	YP_002932398.1 Edwardsiella ictaluri 93-146 EscC [Identities = 89/356 (25%), Positives = 154/356 (43%), Gaps = 70/356 (19%)] (3e-08)	No
ORF05921	Type III secretion low calcium response chaperone LcrH/SycD/SpaT	ZP_01985138.1 Vibrioharveyi HY01 type III secretion low calcium response chaperone LcrH/SycD [Identities = 52/149 (34%), Positives = 91/149 (61%), Gaps = 0/149 (0%)] (4e-21)	No
ORF05929	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	YP_001906486.1 Erwiniatasmaniensis Et1/99 Potential ORFB-specific chaperone, encodes a homolog of virulence/avirulence effector proteins secreted via the type III pathway [Identities = 35/107 (32%), Positives = 55/107 (51%), Gaps = 3/107 (2%)] (1e-08)	No
ORF05931	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	YP_002680810.1 Pseudovibrio sp. JE062 type III secretion chaperone, CesT family [Identities = 31/124 (25%), Positives = 59/124 (47%), Gaps = 2/124 (1%)] (1e-05)	No
ORF05932	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	YP_595407.1 Lawsonia intracellularis PHE/MN1-00 hypothetical protein LI1032 [Identities = 42/132 (31%), Positives = 65/132 (49%), Gaps = 3/132 (2%)] (1e-08)	No
ORF05933	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	YP_961179.1 Desulfovibrio vulgaris spp. vulgaris DP4 TIR chaperone family protein [Identities = 32/111 (28%), Positives = 54/111 (48%), Gaps = 5/111 (4%)] (3e-07)	No
ORF06015	Type III secretion chaperone CesT family	YP_434498.1 Hahella chejuensis KCTC 2396 hypothetical protein HCH_03318 [Identities = 35/141 (24%), Positives = 61/141 (43%), Gaps = 7/141 (4%)] (0.001)	No

Table A2.

Results of yeast two-hybrid screening to detect protein:protein interactions between putative needle proteins and putative chaperones.

Bait/prey pair	HIS3 induction				B-Galactosidase induction	Interaction
	SC−	SC−	SC−	SC−	X-Gal assay
	Leu−	Leu−	Leu−	Leu−
	Trp−	Trp−	Trp−	Trp−
	His+	His+	His+	His+
	10 mM	25 mM	50 mM	100 mM
	3AT	3AT	3AT	3AT
pEXP32Krev1/pEXPRalGDS-wt (control strong positive interaction)	+	+	+	+	Blue	Strong
pEXP32Krev1/pEXPRalGDS-m1 (control weak positive interaction)	+	+	+	+	Blue	Weak
pEXP32Krev1/pEXPRalGDS-m2 (control negative interaction)	−	−	−	−	White	No
pEXP32VspF1/pEXP22VspF2	−	−	−	−	White	No
pEXP32VspF1/pEXP22VspE	+	+	+	+	Blue	Strong
pEXP32VspF1/pEXP22VspG	−	−	−	−	White	No
pEXP32VspF2/pEXP22VspF2	−	−	−	−	White	No
pEXP32VspF2/pEXP22VspE	−	−	−	−	White	No
pEXP32VspF2/pEXP22VspG	−	−	−	−	White	No

Table A3.

Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

Gene product	Open Reading frame	Oligonucleotide primers		Primer binding positions	Primer annealing temp.°C
		Forward primer (5′→3′)	Reverse primer (5′→3′)
VspC	ORF05910	AAGACCAAGAACACCCGCCAGATA	AAG AAG CGC TGT TTG CGC TCA TTC	1595f-1698r	62
VspQ	ORF05897	AAGGTGCCTGTGAGGTGCTGATTT	GCG GGA TCG CTC ATG ATG AAT TGT	567f-666r	62
VspF1	ORF05908	AGCTCACTGAATATCTCGGCACCT	TTTCAGCCTGATCAATGCTGTGGG	71f-190r	62
VspF2	ORF05907	ACGAAGAAACCACCCAGGTGATGA	TGGATCGCTTTCACAAGGTTGGAG	83f-221r	62
VspF1	ORF05908	CAC CAT GAC AGA CAT TGA TAC	TCA GTC GTT TTG TTT ATC CCC	17f-235r	60
VspF2	ORF05907	CAC CAT GGC AAT TGA CTT TG	CTA ACG AAG GTT GCT GAC AG	16f-239r	60
VspG	ORF05906	CAC CAT GAT CCC CGT CGA T	TCA TAG AAA GTT GCG TTT GGG	15f-388r	60
VspE	ORF05905	CAC CAT GAG CGT ACC TCT TG	TCA ACC GCC GCG GCT GAG	16f-439r	60
	ORF05930	CAC CAT GCA CAA GAT TTC CG	TCA GTC CCC GAT CTT GTC CG	16f-2044r	58
	ORF05930	CCATA ATG CAC AAG ATT TCC G	GTC CCC GAT CTT GTC CGA C	16f-2046r	58
	ORF01842	CCATA ATG CCT CCT ATT TC	CCT GGG GGA GTC CGG TC	14f-560r	56
	ORF04374	CCATA ATG AAT AGC TTC C	CAA GAG GAT GAT CGA TG	13f-1070r	56
	ORF03840	CCATA ATG AAA ATC TCT AGC G	GTCCG CGG AGC GCA AAG	16f-662r	56
	ORF04373	CCATA ATG ATC GAC GAC TC	GGCGC AGA GAT AGT GCG	14f-434r	58
	ORF05921	CCATA ATG CCG ACG GGC	TGA CTC GGA AGT GGC GG	12f-497r	56

Figure A1.

Caenorhabditis elegans survival assays. Each experiment comprised approximately 100 worms. (A) Wild-type worms (N2) exposed to live V. spinosum died faster than worms exposed to E. coli, according to log-rank analysis (p = 3.71 e⁻⁷), whereas worms exposed to heat-killed V. spinosum died no faster than worms exposed to E. coli (p = 0.319). (B) When exposed to S. aureus, worm mutants hypersensitive to pathogens (fshr-1) died faster than N2 wild-type worms (p = 9.66 e⁻¹⁵). fshr-1(ok778) worms over-expressing wild-type fshr-1 from a multi-copy transgenic array died more slowly than N2 wild-type worms (p = 0.00114). (C) When exposed to E. faecalis, worm mutants hypersensitive to pathogens (fshr-1) died faster than N2 wild-type worms (p = 3.69 e⁻⁵). fshr-1(ok778) worms over-expressing wild-type fshr-1 from a multi-copy transgenic array died more slowly than N2 wild-type worms (p = 0.000799). (D) When exposed to E. coli, there was no difference in the mortality rate between wild-type worms, fshr-1(ok778) mutants (p = 0.541, relative to wild-type), and fshr-1(ok778) mutants over-expressing wild-type fshr-1 from a transgenic multi-copy array (p = 0.169, relative to wild-type).