Abstract
A critique is presented of the Lumsden-Wilson theory [Lumsden, C. J. & Wilson, E. O. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 4382-4386] of the transmission of cultural traits. An analysis of the underlying assumptions and the mathematical nature of the theory clarifies its essentially reductionist and determinist qualities. The mathematical functions governing the transition probability that an individual member of a group of a specified size will switch from one trait to an alternative form of that trait is assumed to be genetically controlled although the single independent variable of this function, the number of individuals characterized by each of the two forms of the trait, is environmentally determined. The model assumes that the cultural properties of a society are simply the sum of the properties of the individuals; that each individual is equally influenced by every other member of the group; and that kinship structures, cultural institutions, and historical factors can be neglected.
Keywords: human sociobiology, ethnography, epigenetic rules, social development
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Lumsden C. J., Wilson E. O. Gene-culture translation in the avoidance of sibling incest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Oct;77(10):6248–6250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.10.6248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lumsden C. J., Wilson E. O. Translation of epigenetic rules of individual behavior into ethnographic patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul;77(7):4382–4386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.4382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]