Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1981 Jul;78(7):4304–4308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.7.4304

Folding units in globular proteins.

A M Lesk, G D Rose
PMCID: PMC319778  PMID: 6945585

Abstract

We present a method to identify all compact, contiguous-chain, structural units in a globular protein from x-ray coordinates. These units are then used to describe a complete set of hierarchic folding pathways for the molecule. Our analysis shows that the larger units are combinations of smaller units, giving rise to a structural hierarchy ranging from the whole protein monomer through supersecondary structures down to individual helices and strands. It turns out that there is more than one way to assemble the protein by self-association of its compact units. However, the number of possible pathways is small--small enough to be exhaustively explored by a computer program. The hierarchic organization of compact units in protein molecules is consistent with a model for folding by hierarchic condensation. In this model, neighboring hydrophobic chain sites interact to form folding clusters, with further stepwise cluster association giving rise to a population of folding intermediates.

Full text

PDF
4304

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cohen F. E., Richmond T. J., Richards F. M. Protein folding: evaluation of some simple rules for the assembly of helices into tertiary structures with myoglobin as an example. J Mol Biol. 1979 Aug 15;132(3):275–288. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90260-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen F. E., Sternberg M. J. On the use of chemically derived distance constraints in the prediction of protein structure with myoglobin as an example. J Mol Biol. 1980 Feb 15;137(1):9–22. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90154-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen F. E., Sternberg M. J., Phillips D. C., Kuntz I. D., Kollman P. A. A diffusion--collision--adhesion model for the kinetics of myoglobin refolding. Nature. 1980 Aug 7;286(5773):632–634. doi: 10.1038/286632a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Creighton T. E. Experimental studies of protein folding and unfolding. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1978;33(3):231–297. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(79)90030-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crippen G. M. The tree structural organization of proteins. J Mol Biol. 1978 Dec 15;126(3):315–332. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90043-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kanehisa M. I., Tsong T. Y. Local hydrophobicity stabilizes secondary structures in proteins. Biopolymers. 1980 Sep;19(9):1617–1628. doi: 10.1002/bip.1980.360190906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Levitt M., Chothia C. Structural patterns in globular proteins. Nature. 1976 Jun 17;261(5561):552–558. doi: 10.1038/261552a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nozaki Y., Tanford C. The solubility of amino acids and two glycine peptides in aqueous ethanol and dioxane solutions. Establishment of a hydrophobicity scale. J Biol Chem. 1971 Apr 10;246(7):2211–2217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Némethy G., Scheraga H. A. A possible folding pathway of bovine pancreatic RNase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Dec;76(12):6050–6054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ptitsyn O. B., Rashin A. A. A model of myoglobin self-organization. Biophys Chem. 1975 Feb;3(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(75)80033-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Richards F. M. Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1977;6:151–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.001055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Richardson J. S. beta-Sheet topology and the relatedness of proteins. Nature. 1977 Aug 11;268(5620):495–500. doi: 10.1038/268495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Richmond T. J., Richards F. M. Packing of alpha-helices: geometrical constraints and contact areas. J Mol Biol. 1978 Mar 15;119(4):537–555. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90201-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rose G. D. A hierarchic model for the self-assembly of globular proteins. Biophys J. 1980 Oct;32(1):419–422. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(80)84965-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rose G. D. Hierarchic organization of domains in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1979 Nov 5;134(3):447–470. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90363-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rose G. D. Prediction of chain turns in globular proteins on a hydrophobic basis. Nature. 1978 Apr 13;272(5654):586–590. doi: 10.1038/272586a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rose G. D., Roy S. Hydrophobic basis of packing in globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4643–4647. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sternberg M. J., Thornton J. M. On the conformation of proteins: an analysis of beta-pleated sheets. J Mol Biol. 1977 Feb 25;110(2):285–296. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80073-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tanaka S., Scheraga H. A. Hypothesis about the mechanism of protein folding. Macromolecules. 1977 Mar-Apr;10(2):291–304. doi: 10.1021/ma60056a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wodak S. J., Janin J. Analytical approximation to the accessible surface area of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):1736–1740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.1736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES