Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 21.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroreport. 2007 Feb 12;18(3):203–207. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280115942

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Group differences in callosal thickness. Illustrated are regions of significant differences in callosal thickness between Williams syndrome (WS) patients and controls. The color bar encodes the P value associated with the t-test performed at each distance value from upper and lower callosal boundaries. Permutation tests were significant for the comparison of controls > WS (both in native and scaled space), but not significant for the findings of WS > controls. Results shownin the left panelare based on analyses in native space; findings on the right refer to scaled space.