Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Aug 6;67(Pt 9):m1203. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811030637

Bis[2-(2-amino­ethyl­amino)­ethanol]copper(II) dinitrate

Reza Azadbakht a,*, Hadi Amiri Rudbari b, Giuseppe Bruno b
PMCID: PMC3200608  PMID: 22058846

Abstract

In the title compound, [Cu(C4H12N2O)2](NO3)2, the central CuII atom has a distorted octa­hedral coordination geometry and is surrounded by four N atoms and two O atoms from the two inversion-related 2-(2-amino­ethyl­amino)­ethanol ligands. In the crystal, mol­ecules are held together by inter­molecular O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation of a three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For crystal structures of related complexes, see: Qu et al. (2004); Uçar & Bulut (2005); Chastain & Dominick (1973). graphic file with name e-67-m1203-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(C4H12N2O)2](NO3)2

  • M r = 395.87

  • Tetragonal, Inline graphic

  • a = 14.6640 (1) Å

  • c = 29.8298 (7) Å

  • V = 6414.39 (16) Å3

  • Z = 16

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.41 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.45 × 0.36 × 0.23 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) T min = 0.532, T max = 0.741

  • 224935 measured reflections

  • 4172 independent reflections

  • 3346 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.047

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.035

  • wR(F 2) = 0.121

  • S = 1.04

  • 4172 reflections

  • 109 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.67 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.72 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030637/qm2020sup1.cif

e-67-m1203-sup1.cif (19.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030637/qm2020Isup2.hkl

e-67-m1203-Isup2.hkl (200.9KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2A⋯O3i 0.90 2.14 2.9963 (17) 159
O1—H1⋯O4ii 0.93 2.28 3.1256 (16) 152
N2—H2B⋯O4iii 0.90 2.58 3.3356 (18) 141
N1—H2⋯O4iv 0.92 (2) 2.49 (2) 3.2449 (18) 139.8 (18)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Payame Noor University (PNU) for financial support.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Metal alkanolamines complexes are among the most investigated compounds in coordination chemistry. As an extension of the work, we report here the crystal structure of the title compound, (I), a CuII complex incorporating the ligand N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediamine. The structure of bis [N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediamine] copper(II) nitrate consists of discrete [Cu(L)2]2+cations and nitrate anions. The closest distance between Cu and O of NO3 is 5.85 Å. The ORTEP diagram of the cation with the atom numbering scheme is shown in Fig. 1. The Ligand (L) coordinates in a tridentate manner via two nitrogen atoms and one oxygen atom, as shown in Fig. 1, providing a distorted octahedral arrangement about copper. The two O atoms coordinate to the CuII atom in trans positions, while the four N atoms occupy the equatorial positions. The three trans angles at the CuII atom are about 172° and the other angles subtended at the CuII atom are close to 90°, varying from 81.26 (15) to 95.15 (15)°. The two O atoms coordinate to the CuII atom in trans positions. The secondary-amine N-atoms and primary-amine N-atoms coordinate to the CuII atom in trans positions. In the crystal structure, the molecules are held together by intermolecular O—-H—O and N—-H—-O hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation of a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2 and Table 2).

Experimental

Copper(II) nitrate dihydrate (0.5 mol) in 50 ml of methanol was slowly mixed with N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediamine (1 mol) in 50 ml of methanol. The reaction was refluxed for a further 2 h. The solution volume was then reduced to 10 ml by roto-evaporation. Vapour diffusion of ether into this solution afforded pink crystals.

Refinement

The H-atoms were included in calculated positions and treated as riding atoms: O—H = 0.93 Å, C—-H=0.97 Å, N—H = 0.93and 0.90 Å for NH and NH2, respectively, with Uiso(H) = k × Ueq(C), where k = 1.5 for OH and CH3 H-atoms and k = 1.2 for all other H-atoms.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The structure of title compound, showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids and the atom-numbering scheme.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The crystal packing of title compound, viewed along the a axis. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines.

Crystal data

[Cu(C4H12N2O)2](NO3)2 Dx = 1.640 Mg m3
Mr = 395.87 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Tetragonal, I41/acd Cell parameters from 9080 reflections
Hall symbol: -I 4bd 2c θ = 3.1–36.4°
a = 14.6640 (1) Å µ = 1.41 mm1
c = 29.8298 (7) Å T = 296 K
V = 6414.39 (16) Å3 Regular, pink
Z = 16 0.45 × 0.36 × 0.23 mm
F(000) = 3312

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 4172 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 3346 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.047
φ and ω scans θmax = 37.5°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) h = −24→24
Tmin = 0.532, Tmax = 0.741 k = −24→24
224935 measured reflections l = −50→50

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.121 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0796P)2 + 2.0215P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4172 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
109 parameters Δρmax = 0.67 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.72 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cu 0.7500 0.309239 (12) 0.0000 0.02305 (7)
O1 0.61649 (7) 0.29396 (8) −0.02849 (4) 0.0422 (2)
H1 0.5640 0.3209 −0.0170 0.051*
O2 0.77057 (12) 0.25081 (15) 0.19377 (6) 0.0770 (5)
O3 0.71878 (11) 0.38235 (9) 0.21338 (6) 0.0619 (4)
O4 0.62849 (9) 0.26916 (9) 0.20917 (4) 0.0566 (3)
N1 0.71690 (7) 0.21768 (7) 0.05303 (3) 0.02816 (17)
N2 0.79384 (7) 0.40760 (7) −0.04633 (4) 0.03194 (19)
H2A 0.7556 0.4556 −0.0460 0.038*
H2B 0.8499 0.4275 −0.0388 0.038*
N3 0.70700 (9) 0.29975 (8) 0.20544 (4) 0.0358 (2)
C1 0.66926 (10) 0.27016 (10) 0.08834 (4) 0.0377 (3)
H1A 0.6779 0.2401 0.1170 0.045*
H1B 0.6044 0.2710 0.0819 0.045*
C2 0.79595 (10) 0.36737 (10) −0.09140 (5) 0.0388 (3)
H2C 0.8356 0.4029 −0.1107 0.047*
H2D 0.7352 0.3678 −0.1042 0.047*
C3 0.61890 (9) 0.23541 (11) −0.06844 (5) 0.0411 (3)
H3A 0.6231 0.2731 −0.0951 0.049*
H3B 0.5629 0.2004 −0.0702 0.049*
C4 0.80093 (10) 0.17140 (11) 0.06673 (6) 0.0441 (3)
H4A 0.8140 0.1225 0.0458 0.053*
H4B 0.7921 0.1444 0.0961 0.053*
H2 0.6816 (15) 0.1700 (17) 0.0429 (7) 0.054 (6)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu 0.01921 (9) 0.02340 (9) 0.02654 (10) 0.000 0.00019 (5) 0.000
O1 0.0266 (4) 0.0506 (5) 0.0494 (6) 0.0057 (4) −0.0040 (4) −0.0110 (5)
O2 0.0687 (9) 0.0947 (13) 0.0675 (9) 0.0433 (9) −0.0148 (7) −0.0199 (9)
O3 0.0572 (7) 0.0336 (5) 0.0948 (11) −0.0136 (5) −0.0136 (7) 0.0028 (6)
O4 0.0502 (6) 0.0520 (7) 0.0675 (7) −0.0214 (5) −0.0097 (5) 0.0097 (6)
N1 0.0238 (3) 0.0278 (4) 0.0328 (4) −0.0029 (3) 0.0010 (3) 0.0025 (3)
N2 0.0318 (4) 0.0264 (4) 0.0376 (5) −0.0005 (3) 0.0019 (4) 0.0050 (3)
N3 0.0378 (5) 0.0323 (5) 0.0374 (5) −0.0004 (4) −0.0086 (4) 0.0040 (4)
C1 0.0393 (6) 0.0418 (7) 0.0321 (5) −0.0039 (5) 0.0098 (4) 0.0012 (5)
C2 0.0428 (6) 0.0409 (6) 0.0326 (5) −0.0011 (5) 0.0032 (5) 0.0098 (5)
C3 0.0274 (5) 0.0523 (8) 0.0435 (6) −0.0019 (5) −0.0058 (4) −0.0132 (6)
C4 0.0338 (6) 0.0386 (7) 0.0598 (9) 0.0033 (5) 0.0007 (6) 0.0213 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cu—N2 2.0984 (10) N2—H2A 0.9000
Cu—N2i 2.0984 (10) N2—H2B 0.9000
Cu—N1i 2.1308 (10) C1—C2i 1.517 (2)
Cu—N1 2.1308 (10) C1—H1A 0.9700
Cu—O1 2.1460 (10) C1—H1B 0.9700
Cu—O1i 2.1460 (10) C2—C1i 1.517 (2)
O1—C3 1.4693 (17) C2—H2C 0.9700
O1—H1 0.9300 C2—H2D 0.9700
O2—N3 1.2269 (19) C3—C4i 1.505 (2)
O3—N3 1.2462 (16) C3—H3A 0.9700
O4—N3 1.2406 (17) C3—H3B 0.9700
N1—C4 1.4649 (17) C4—C3i 1.505 (2)
N1—C1 1.4798 (17) C4—H4A 0.9700
N1—H2 0.92 (2) C4—H4B 0.9700
N2—C2 1.4684 (18)
N2—Cu—N2i 93.16 (6) H2A—N2—H2B 108.2
N2—Cu—N1i 82.79 (4) O2—N3—O4 121.27 (17)
N2i—Cu—N1i 172.64 (4) O2—N3—O3 121.15 (17)
N2—Cu—N1 172.64 (4) O4—N3—O3 117.58 (15)
N2i—Cu—N1 82.79 (4) N1—C1—C2i 111.89 (10)
N1i—Cu—N1 101.88 (6) N1—C1—H1A 109.2
N2—Cu—O1 95.19 (5) C2i—C1—H1A 109.2
N2i—Cu—O1 93.04 (4) N1—C1—H1B 109.2
N1i—Cu—O1 81.26 (4) C2i—C1—H1B 109.2
N1—Cu—O1 91.17 (4) H1A—C1—H1B 107.9
N2—Cu—O1i 93.04 (4) N2—C2—C1i 109.24 (10)
N2i—Cu—O1i 95.19 (5) N2—C2—H2C 109.8
N1i—Cu—O1i 91.17 (4) C1i—C2—H2C 109.8
N1—Cu—O1i 81.26 (4) N2—C2—H2D 109.8
O1—Cu—O1i 168.02 (6) C1i—C2—H2D 109.8
C3—O1—Cu 111.12 (7) H2C—C2—H2D 108.3
C3—O1—H1 124.4 O1—C3—C4i 110.83 (11)
Cu—O1—H1 124.4 O1—C3—H3A 109.5
C4—N1—C1 116.07 (12) C4i—C3—H3A 109.5
C4—N1—Cu 107.91 (8) O1—C3—H3B 109.5
C1—N1—Cu 107.95 (8) C4i—C3—H3B 109.5
C4—N1—H2 102.3 (14) H3A—C3—H3B 108.1
C1—N1—H2 111.3 (14) N1—C4—C3i 112.19 (11)
Cu—N1—H2 111.2 (14) N1—C4—H4A 109.2
C2—N2—Cu 109.47 (8) C3i—C4—H4A 109.2
C2—N2—H2A 109.8 N1—C4—H4B 109.2
Cu—N2—H2A 109.8 C3i—C4—H4B 109.2
C2—N2—H2B 109.8 H4A—C4—H4B 107.9
Cu—N2—H2B 109.8
N2—Cu—O1—C3 79.30 (10) O1i—Cu—N1—C1 105.41 (9)
N2i—Cu—O1—C3 172.76 (10) N2i—Cu—N2—C2 −157.09 (10)
N1i—Cu—O1—C3 −2.56 (10) N1i—Cu—N2—C2 16.74 (8)
N1—Cu—O1—C3 −104.40 (10) O1—Cu—N2—C2 −63.74 (9)
O1i—Cu—O1—C3 −53.89 (10) O1i—Cu—N2—C2 107.54 (9)
N2i—Cu—N1—C4 −117.16 (10) C4—N1—C1—C2i 88.06 (14)
N1i—Cu—N1—C4 68.61 (10) Cu—N1—C1—C2i −33.15 (13)
O1—Cu—N1—C4 149.92 (10) Cu—N2—C2—C1i −38.94 (13)
O1i—Cu—N1—C4 −20.75 (10) Cu—O1—C3—C4i 25.17 (15)
N2i—Cu—N1—C1 9.00 (8) C1—N1—C4—C3i −79.92 (15)
N1i—Cu—N1—C1 −165.23 (9) Cu—N1—C4—C3i 41.32 (15)
O1—Cu—N1—C1 −83.92 (8)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, y, −z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H2A···O3ii 0.90 2.14 2.9963 (17) 159.
O1—H1···O4iii 0.93 2.28 3.1256 (16) 152.
N2—H2B···O4iv 0.90 2.58 3.3356 (18) 141.
N1—H2···O4v 0.92 (2) 2.49 (2) 3.2449 (18) 139.8 (18)

Symmetry codes: (ii) y+1/4, −x+5/4, z−1/4; (iii) −y+3/4, x−1/4, −z+1/4; (iv) y+3/4, x−1/4, z−1/4; (v) y+1/4, −x+3/4, −z+1/4.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: QM2020).

References

  1. Bruker (2009). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Chastain, R. V. Jr & Dominick, T. L. (1973). Inorg. Chem. 12, 1973–2621
  3. Qu, Y., You, Z.-L., Liu, Z.-D., Zhu, H.-L. & Tan, M.-Y. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, m1187–m1188.
  4. Sheldrick, G. M. (2004). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Uçar, I. & Bulut, A. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, m2730–m2732.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030637/qm2020sup1.cif

e-67-m1203-sup1.cif (19.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030637/qm2020Isup2.hkl

e-67-m1203-Isup2.hkl (200.9KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES