Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Aug 6;67(Pt 9):i47–i48. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811030911

Redetermination of despujolsite, Ca3Mn4+(SO4)2(OH)6·3H2O

Madison C Barkley a,*,, Hexiong Yang a, Stanley H Evans a, Robert T Downs a, Marcus J Origlieri a
PMCID: PMC3200628  PMID: 22064218

Abstract

The crystal structure of despujolsite [tricalcium manganese bis­(sulfate) hexahydroxide tri­hydrate], the Ca/Mn member of the fleischerite group, ideally Ca3Mn4+(SO4)2(OH)6·3H2O, was previously determined based on X-ray diffraction intensity data from photographs, without H-atom positions located [Gaudefroy et al. (1968). Bull. Soc. Fr. Minéral. Crystallogr. 91, 43–50]. The current study redetermines the structure of despujolsite from a natural specimen, with all H atoms located and with higher precision. The structure of despujolsite is characterized by layers of CaO8 polyhedra (m.. symmetry) inter­connected by Mn(OH)6 octa­hedra (32. symmetry) and SO4 tetra­hedra (3.. symmetry) along [001]. The average Ca—O, Mn—O and S—O bond lengths are 2.489, 1.915, and 1.472 Å, respectively. There are two distinct hydrogen bonds that stabilize the structural set-up. This work represents the first description of hydrogen bonds in the fleischerite group of minerals.

Related literature

For the previous determination of the despujolsite crystal structure, see: Gaudefroy et al. (1968). For background to fleischerite, see: Otto (1975). For the crystal structures of sulfate minerals with split O sites, see: Hill (1977); Jacobsen et al. (1998). For TLS (translation, libration, and screw motions) rigid-body analysis, see: Downs (2000). Parameters for bond-valence analysis were taken from Brese & O’Keeffe (1991).

Experimental

Crystal data

  • Ca3Mn(SO4)2(OH)6·3H2O

  • M r = 523.40

  • Hexagonal, Inline graphic

  • a = 8.5405 (5) Å

  • c = 10.8094 (9) Å

  • V = 682.81 (8) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 2.49 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.07 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a ) T min = 0.845, T max = 0.907

  • 6018 measured reflections

  • 871 independent reflections

  • 758 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.051

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.024

  • wR(F 2) = 0.048

  • S = 1.06

  • 871 reflections

  • 49 parameters

  • All H-atom paramters refined

  • Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.30 e Å−3

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 305 Friedel pairs

  • Flack parameter: 0.0 (9)

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008b ); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008b ); molecular graphics: XtalDraw (Downs & Hall-Wallace, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008b ).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030911/wm2518sup1.cif

e-67-00i47-sup1.cif (12.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030911/wm2518Isup2.hkl

e-67-00i47-Isup2.hkl (43.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å).

Mn—OH3i 1.9149 (11)
Ca—O2ii 2.3465 (11)
Ca—OH3i 2.456 (5)
Ca—OH3iii 2.518 (5)
Ca—OW4 2.578 (9)
Ca—OW4iv 2.690 (9)
S—O2 1.4697 (11)
S—O1 1.4806 (18)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
OH3—H1⋯O2v 0.75 (2) 2.11 (2) 2.8193 (16) 158 (3)
OW4—H2⋯O1vi 0.77 (2) 2.10 (2) 2.7892 (18) 150 (3)

Symmetry codes: (v) Inline graphic; (vi) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge support of this study by the Carnegie-DOE Alliance Center under cooperative agreement DE FC52–08 N A28554, BP p.l.c., Tucson Gem and Mineral Society and the Arizona Science Foundation.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Despujolsite, ideally Ca3Mn4+(SO4)2(OH)6.3H2O, is a member of the fleischerite group of minerals, which includes fleischerite, Pb3Ge(SO4)2(OH)6.3H2O, mallestigite, Pb3Sb(SO4)(AsO4)(OH)6.3H2O, and schauerteite, Ca3Ge4+(SO4)2(OH)6.3H2O. Thus far, only the structures of despujolsite and fleischerite (from a synthetic sample with the O1 site split) in this group have been determined (Gaudefroy et al., 1968; Otto, 1975), both of which were based on X-ray diffraction intensity data measured from photographs, without H atom positions located. An R-factor of 0.162 was obtained for the structure model of despujolsite (Gaudefroy et al., 1968). In our efforts to understand hydrogen bonding environments in general and the relationships in the hydrogen bonding schemes in the minerals of the fleischerite group in particular, we noted that the structural information of despujolsite needed to be improved.

The structure of despujolsite consists of layers of CaO8 polyhedra (m.. symmetry), interconnected by Mn(OH)6 octahedra (32. symmetry) and SO4 tetrahedra (3.. symmetry). The average Mn—O bond length is 1.915 Å (Table 1). Calculations of bond-valence sums using the parameters from Brese & O'Keeffe (1991) yield 3.86 (v.u.) for Mn, indicating that the assigned valence of 4+ for Mn is consistent with the structure. The average S—O bond length is 1.472 Å. Ca atoms are eight coordinated with 4 (OH)- ions, 2 H2O molecules, and 2 O atoms. The average Ca—O bond length is 2.489 Å. There are two distinct hydrogen bonds: OH3—H1···O2 and OW4—H2··· O1 (Table 2).

The isostructural mineral fleischerite was previously modeled (Otto, 1975) with a split site for the O1 position. Similarly, studies of the sulfate mineral, barite BaSO4, refined the O atoms that lie on special positions with a split atom model (Hill, 1977). However, Hill notes that there are no significant improvements in the refinement with a split-site model over the symmetry-constrained model. Further structure refinement with significantly better data by Jacobsen et al. (1998) led to a TLS (translation, libration, and screw motions) rigid body analysis (Downs, 2000) of the sulfate group. The results indicated that the SO4 group behaves as a rigid body with significant translational and librational motions, demonstrating that the O atom sites are not split and that the large sizes of the displacement parameters are due entirely to thermal motion.

In contrast to the fleischerite study, our refinement of despujolsite did not indicate a split site. A TLS analysis of the displacement parameters indicate that the SO4 group in despujolsite behaves likewise as a rigid body with a translational amplitude of 0.72 Å and a large libration angle of 7.95°. The libration angle for the SO4 group in despujolsite, which is consistent with the 7°-8° range found in celestine, anglesite, and barite, indicates that the S–O bond lengths are ~0.009Å longer than their apparent values. If the libration angle is also large in fleischerite, then this may account for the effectiveness of splitting the O1 site, but our study indicates that the O1 site in fleischerite may not actually split.

Experimental

The despujolsite specimen used in this study is from N'Chwaning III mine, Kalahari Manganese field, Northern Cape Province, South Africa and is in the collection of the RRUFF project (deposition No. R100208; http://rruff.info). The composition was determined with a CAMECA SX100 electron microprobe (http://rruff.info) on a single-crystal from the same parent sample as the crystal used for the collection of X-ray diffraction intensity data. Electron microprobe analysis (15 points) with a 15 K eV accelerating voltage, 20 nA beam current, and a 5 µm beam size yielded an empirical chemical formula Ca3.45Mn4+0.86(S0.96O4)2(OH)6.3H2O (based on 11 O atoms). Because despujolsite crystals are not stable under the electron beam, which has also been observed by Gaudefroy et al. (1968), the electron microprobe data were used only for the estimation of cation ratios. The actual composition was determined by a combination of microprobe and X-ray structural analyses. Details of the sample chemistry and structural formula calculations can be found on the RRUFF Project website (http://rruff.info/R100208).

Refinement

The H atoms were located from difference Fourier maps and their positions were refined with isotropic displacement parameters. The final refinement assumed an ideal chemistry, as the overall effects of the trace amount of Fe and Si on the final structure results are negligible. The highest residual peak in the difference Fourier maps was located 0.66 Å from O1, and the deepest hole was located 0.40 Å from Mn.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The crystal structure of despujolsite. Yellow tetrahedra represent SO4 groups. Blue octahedra and purple polyhedra represent Mn(OH)6 groups and Ca(O,OH,H2O)8 groups, respectively. Light blue spheres represent H1 and H2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Atoms in despujolsite with corresponding ellipsoids at 99% probability. SO4 groups are treated as rigid bodies and shown as yellow tetrahedra. Blue, purple, and red ellipsoids represent Mn, Ca, and O atoms, respectively. Hydrogen atoms are shown as light-blue spheres.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

H-bonding interactions in despujolsite. Yellow tetrahedra represent SO4 groups. Purple polyhedra represent Ca(O,OH,H2O)8 groups. Red ellipsoids and blue spheres represent O and H atoms, respectively.

Crystal data

Ca3Mn(SO4)2(OH)6·3H2O Dx = 2.546 Mg m3
Mr = 523.40 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hexagonal, P62c Cell parameters from 1145 reflections
Hall symbol: P -6c -2c θ = 2.8–32.0°
a = 8.5405 (5) Å µ = 2.49 mm1
c = 10.8094 (9) Å T = 293 K
V = 682.81 (8) Å3 Euhedral, yellow
Z = 2 0.07 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm
F(000) = 530

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer 871 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 758 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.051
φ and ω scans θmax = 32.6°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008a) h = −12→11
Tmin = 0.845, Tmax = 0.907 k = −12→12
6018 measured reflections l = −16→15

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full All H-atom parameters refined
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0113P)2 + 0.2266P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.048 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.06 Δρmax = 0.45 e Å3
871 reflections Δρmin = −0.30 e Å3
49 parameters Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraints Extinction coefficient: 0.0142 (11)
0 constraints Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 305 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Flack parameter: 0.0 (9)
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Mn 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00846 (12)
Ca 0.1521 (3) 0.30348 (5) 0.2500 0.01085 (10)
S 0.3333 0.6667 0.02544 (5) 0.00936 (12)
O1 0.3333 0.6667 −0.11153 (15) 0.0167 (4)
O2 0.2419 (10) 0.47842 (15) 0.06891 (10) 0.0188 (3)
OH3 0.8945 (8) 0.0966 (8) 0.11070 (10) 0.0109 (3)
OW4 0.5006 (12) 0.4853 (12) 0.2500 0.0171 (5)
H1 0.836 (6) 0.125 (6) 0.076 (2) 0.026 (8)*
H2 0.521 (9) 0.445 (9) 0.193 (2) 0.046 (10)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Mn 0.00919 (15) 0.00919 (15) 0.0070 (2) 0.00460 (8) 0.000 0.000
Ca 0.0137 (10) 0.00918 (19) 0.00980 (16) 0.0058 (10) 0.000 0.000
S 0.01001 (16) 0.01001 (16) 0.0081 (2) 0.00501 (8) 0.000 0.000
O1 0.0213 (6) 0.0213 (6) 0.0075 (7) 0.0107 (3) 0.000 0.000
O2 0.027 (3) 0.0106 (5) 0.0170 (5) 0.008 (2) 0.004 (3) 0.0033 (4)
OH3 0.0084 (15) 0.0148 (19) 0.0107 (4) 0.0067 (6) −0.0006 (16) −0.0004 (16)
OW4 0.019 (2) 0.023 (2) 0.0136 (6) 0.0138 (12) 0.000 0.000

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Mn—OH3i 1.9149 (11) Ca—OH3viii 2.456 (5)
Mn—OH3ii 1.9149 (11) Ca—OH3iii 2.518 (5)
Mn—OH3iii 1.9149 (11) Ca—OH3ix 2.518 (5)
Mn—OH3iv 1.9149 (11) Ca—OW4 2.578 (9)
Mn—OH3v 1.9149 (11) Ca—OW4x 2.690 (9)
Mn—OH3vi 1.9149 (11) S—O2x 1.4697 (11)
Ca—O2vii 2.3465 (11) S—O2xi 1.4697 (11)
Ca—O2 2.3465 (11) S—O2 1.4697 (11)
Ca—OH3i 2.456 (5) S—O1 1.4806 (18)
OH3i—Mn—OH3ii 177.7 (4) OH3ii—Mn—OH3vi 85.08 (5)
OH3i—Mn—OH3iii 85.08 (5) OH3iii—Mn—OH3vi 96.5 (3)
OH3ii—Mn—OH3iii 93.4 (3) OH3iv—Mn—OH3vi 177.7 (4)
OH3i—Mn—OH3iv 85.08 (5) OH3v—Mn—OH3vi 85.08 (5)
OH3ii—Mn—OH3iv 96.5 (3) O2x—S—O2xi 110.28 (5)
OH3iii—Mn—OH3iv 85.08 (5) O2x—S—O2 110.28 (5)
OH3i—Mn—OH3v 96.5 (3) O2xi—S—O2 110.28 (5)
OH3ii—Mn—OH3v 85.08 (5) O2x—S—O1 108.65 (5)
OH3iii—Mn—OH3v 177.7 (4) O2xi—S—O1 108.65 (5)
OH3iv—Mn—OH3v 93.4 (3) O2—S—O1 108.65 (5)
OH3i—Mn—OH3vi 93.4 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+y+1, −x+1, z; (ii) xy−1, −y, −z; (iii) x−1, y, z; (iv) −y, xy−1, z; (v) y, x−1, −z; (vi) −x+1, −x+y+1, −z; (vii) x, y, −z+1/2; (viii) −x+y+1, −x+1, −z+1/2; (ix) x−1, y, −z+1/2; (x) −x+y, −x+1, z; (xi) −y+1, xy+1, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
OH3—H1···O2xii 0.75 (2) 2.11 (2) 2.8193 (16) 158 (3)
OW4—H2···O1xiii 0.77 (2) 2.10 (2) 2.7892 (18) 150 (3)

Symmetry codes: (xii) −x+1, −x+y, −z; (xiii) y, x, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: WM2518).

References

  1. Brese, N. E. & O’Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192–197.
  2. Bruker (2003). SMART Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Bruker (2005). SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Downs, R. T. (2000). RiMG, 41, 61–88.
  5. Downs, R. T. & Hall-Wallace, M. (2003). Am. Mineral. 88, 247–250.
  6. Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.
  7. Gaudefroy, P. C., Granger, M. M., Permingeat, F. & Protas, J. (1968). Bull. Soc. Fr. Minéral. Crystallogr. 91, 43–50.
  8. Hill, R. J. (1977). Can. Mineral. 15, 522–526.
  9. Jacobsen, S. D., Smyth, J. R., Swope, R. J. & Downs, R. T. (1998). Can. Mineral. 36, 1045–1055.
  10. Otto, H. H. (1975). Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 123, 160–190.
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008a). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.
  12. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008b). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030911/wm2518sup1.cif

e-67-00i47-sup1.cif (12.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030911/wm2518Isup2.hkl

e-67-00i47-Isup2.hkl (43.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES