Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Aug 27;67(Pt 9):m1303–m1304. doi: 10.1107/S160053681103409X

catena-Poly[copper(II)-bis­(μ-2-ethyl-5-methyl­imidazole-4-sulfonato-κ3 N 3,O 4:O 4′)]

Andrew P Purdy a,*, Ray J Butcher b
PMCID: PMC3200726  PMID: 22058889

Abstract

In the title compound, [Cu(C6H9N2O3S)2]n, the copper(II) ion sits on an inversion center and is chelated by the imidazole N and sulfonate O atoms of two ligands in equatorial positions. O atoms of adjacent mol­ecules coordinate in the axial positions. Jahn–Teller tetra­gonal distortion is evident in the coordination geometry [Cu—N and Cu—O equatorial distances of 1.971 (3) and 2.045 (2) Å, respectively, with a Cu—O axial distance of 2.433 (3) Å]. The structure is propagated by an infinite chain of eight-membered (Cu—O—S—O)2 ring systems along the a axis. Only N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding exists between the chains.

Related literature

For literature related to the 2-ethyl-4-methyl­imidazole-5-sulfonic acid ligand, see: Purdy et al. (2007). For sulfonate-bridged Cu complexes with Cu–sulfonate chains, see: van Albada et al. (2001); Cai et al. (2004); Doyle et al. (1983); Han et al. (2006); He et al. (2009); Hubig et al. (2000); Sreenivasulu et al. (2005); Timmermans et al. (1984). For geometric data, see: Jahn & Teller (1937). graphic file with name e-67-m1303-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(C6H9N2O3S)2]

  • M r = 441.96

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 5.0732 (4) Å

  • b = 11.8367 (10) Å

  • c = 13.6810 (11) Å

  • β = 94.473 (7)°

  • V = 819.04 (12) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.64 mm−1

  • T = 295 K

  • 0.44 × 0.32 × 0.24 mm

Data collection

  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby Gemini diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: analytical [CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007) based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)T min = 0.270, T max = 0.445

  • 3114 measured reflections

  • 1704 independent reflections

  • 1605 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.033

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.064

  • wR(F 2) = 0.181

  • S = 1.08

  • 1704 reflections

  • 117 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 1.15 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.84 e Å−3

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681103409X/om2453sup1.cif

e-67-m1303-sup1.cif (21KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681103409X/om2453Isup2.hkl

e-67-m1303-Isup2.hkl (84KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected geometric parameters (Å, °).

Cu1—N1 1.971 (3)
Cu1—O1 2.045 (2)
Cu1—O1i 2.045 (2)
Cu1—O3ii 2.433 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2C⋯O2iii 0.86 1.95 2.784 (4) 164

Symmetry code: (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

RJB wishes to acknowledge the NSF-MRI program (grant No. CHE-0619278) for funds to purchase the diffractometer, and we thank the Office of Naval Research for financial support.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In the title compound, the copper(II) ion sits on an inversion center and is chelated by the imidazole N1 and sulfonate O1 of two ligands. The two chelate rings on a Cu are 5-membered and co-planar. Two O3 O atoms of adjacent molecules coordinate the axial positions with the usual Jahn-Teller tetragonal distortion (Jahn & Teller, 1937) ((Cu—N and Cu—O equatorial distances of 1.971 (3) and 2.045 (2) Å, respectively, with a Cu—O axial distance of 2.433 (3) Å) and link the Cu atoms in an infinite chain of 8-membered (Cu—O—S—O)2 rings along the a axis. A number of examples exist for catenated 8-membered rings of sulfonate bridged copper(I) ions - Doyle et al. (1983), Han et al. (2006), Timmermans et al. (1984), and Hubig et al. (2000). All previous examples have 4 or 5 coordinate copper(I) and edge-shared catenation between the rings. This infinite chain of (Cu—O—S—O)2 rings is unique for copper(II), and its rings are corner shared and linear. The Cu coordination is nearly octahedral, with adjacent angles ranging from 84.92 (10) to 93.10 (10)°. Our silver(I) complex of the same ligand (Purdy, et al. (2007)) has edge shared 8-membered rings connected by a tetrahedral Ag atom. The CuO4 moieties are planar, and are nearly perpendicular (85.00 (8)°) to a plane composed of the linear N—Cu—N units within a chain. Likewise the plane formed by the 5-membered Cu—N—C—S—O chelate rings forms a dihedral angle of 86.61 (8)° with the plane formed by the Cu and O3 atoms within a chain.

As noted above, although all Cu—O distances are within the ranges normally observed in sulfonate complexes, the Cu—O3 distance is 0.4 Å longer than Cu—O1 as is seen in bis(µ2-(2-((2-oxybenzylidene)amino)ethyl)sulfonato)-diaqua-dicopper(II) dihydrate and other similar chelated copper(II) sulfonates (Sreenivasulu et al., 2005; Cai et al., 2004). Copper(II) sulfonates where the sulfonate is not part of a chelate ring tend to have Cu—O distance of 2.3 Å or greater as for example in bis(µ2-hydroxo)-bis(µ2-trifluoromethanesulfonato-O,O')-bis(4,4- dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine)-di-copper(II) (van Albada, et al., 2001) and in a sulfonate bridged complex (He, et al., 2009).

The O2 atoms of the sulfonates are hydrogen bonded to the hydogen on N2 of the imidazole ring of an adjacent chain, at a N—O distance of 2.784 (4) Å. This interaction bonds the chains into a fully three-dimensional structure.

Experimental

Both 1:1 and 1:1.5 solutions of the potassium salts of the 2-ethyl-4-methyl-imidazole-5-sulfonic acid were prepared by combining 1 g (5.25 mmol) of the free acid with 1 and 1.5 equivalents of KOH solution respectively, and diluting the solutions to 1M based on K+. (All solutions were made with distilled water.) Two test reactions were done in vials with a 1M solution of CuCl2.2H2O, and a 0.2 ml metered pipet was used for the additions. In reaction #1, 0.2 ml of CuCl2 solution was combined with 0.4 ml of the 1:1 solution. In reaction #2, 0.4 ml or the CuCl2 solution was combined with 0.6 ml of the 1:1.5 solution. Both solutions were heated to a boil and allowed to cool. Both reactions produced a pale green precipitate, but green crystals of the title compound grow in #2 only, over several days.

Refinement

H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with an N—H distance of 0.86 Å and C—H distances of 0.97 ÅUiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and 0.96 Å for CH3 [Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C)].

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Diagram of C12H18CuN4O6S2 illustrating the atom numbering scheme used. Thermal displacement parameters are at the 30% probability level. [symmetry codes for labelled atoms: O1A, N1A, 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z; O3B, x - 1, y, z; O3C, 2 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z]

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The molecular packing for C12H18CuN4O6S2 viewed down the c axis.

Crystal data

[Cu(C6H9N2O3S)2] F(000) = 454
Mr = 441.96 Dx = 1.792 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 2637 reflections
a = 5.0732 (4) Å θ = 5.0–77.1°
b = 11.8367 (10) Å µ = 4.64 mm1
c = 13.6810 (11) Å T = 295 K
β = 94.473 (7)° Chunk, pale green-blue
V = 819.04 (12) Å3 0.44 × 0.32 × 0.24 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby Gemini diffractometer 1704 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Cu) X-ray sealed tube 1605 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.033
Detector resolution: 10.51 pixels mm-1 θmax = 77.6°, θmin = 5.0°
ω scans h = −6→6
Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2007; Clark & Reid, 1995)' k = −14→14
Tmin = 0.270, Tmax = 0.445 l = −17→10
3114 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.064 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.181 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1339P)2 + 0.7529P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1704 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
117 parameters Δρmax = 1.15 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.84 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cu1 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0.0255 (3)
S1 0.94199 (14) 0.32615 (6) 0.53104 (5) 0.0252 (3)
O1 0.8041 (5) 0.4192 (2) 0.57814 (17) 0.0327 (6)
O2 0.8628 (6) 0.2154 (2) 0.56252 (19) 0.0402 (7)
O3 1.2247 (5) 0.3403 (2) 0.53856 (19) 0.0345 (6)
N1 0.6262 (5) 0.4204 (2) 0.38608 (19) 0.0251 (6)
N2 0.7482 (6) 0.3464 (2) 0.2509 (2) 0.0283 (6)
H2C 0.7537 0.3326 0.1894 0.034*
C1 0.5837 (6) 0.4210 (3) 0.2898 (2) 0.0257 (6)
C2 0.3917 (8) 0.4933 (3) 0.2308 (3) 0.0316 (8)
H2A 0.4281 0.5717 0.2474 0.038*
H2B 0.2151 0.4763 0.2492 0.038*
C3 0.3959 (10) 0.4793 (4) 0.1198 (3) 0.0466 (10)
H3A 0.2724 0.5309 0.0872 0.070*
H3B 0.3475 0.4032 0.1018 0.070*
H3C 0.5704 0.4949 0.1008 0.070*
C4 0.9057 (7) 0.2957 (3) 0.3252 (2) 0.0272 (6)
C5 0.8264 (7) 0.3429 (3) 0.4086 (2) 0.0263 (6)
C6 1.1174 (8) 0.2112 (3) 0.3088 (3) 0.0375 (8)
H6A 1.2247 0.1995 0.3689 0.056*
H6B 1.2257 0.2389 0.2595 0.056*
H6C 1.0376 0.1410 0.2875 0.056*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu1 0.0248 (4) 0.0294 (5) 0.0230 (4) 0.0050 (2) 0.0057 (3) −0.0033 (2)
S1 0.0256 (5) 0.0264 (5) 0.0241 (5) 0.0014 (3) 0.0055 (3) 0.0015 (2)
O1 0.0322 (12) 0.0400 (13) 0.0261 (11) 0.0090 (10) 0.0036 (9) −0.0048 (9)
O2 0.0507 (16) 0.0371 (15) 0.0333 (13) −0.0043 (12) 0.0073 (11) 0.0076 (10)
O3 0.0269 (12) 0.0368 (13) 0.0401 (14) 0.0023 (9) 0.0048 (10) 0.0012 (10)
N1 0.0245 (12) 0.0257 (13) 0.0258 (13) 0.0007 (10) 0.0066 (10) −0.0016 (9)
N2 0.0323 (15) 0.0299 (13) 0.0235 (12) 0.0021 (11) 0.0079 (11) −0.0032 (10)
C1 0.0267 (14) 0.0240 (14) 0.0273 (15) −0.0009 (11) 0.0070 (11) −0.0017 (11)
C2 0.0343 (18) 0.0326 (17) 0.0282 (17) 0.0050 (12) 0.0045 (14) 0.0017 (12)
C3 0.059 (3) 0.053 (2) 0.0269 (17) 0.012 (2) 0.0002 (17) 0.0004 (16)
C4 0.0287 (15) 0.0269 (14) 0.0269 (14) 0.0012 (12) 0.0071 (12) −0.0021 (12)
C5 0.0293 (15) 0.0245 (14) 0.0256 (14) 0.0011 (12) 0.0050 (12) 0.0002 (11)
C6 0.0361 (18) 0.0340 (18) 0.0433 (19) 0.0102 (15) 0.0081 (15) −0.0062 (15)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cu1—N1i 1.971 (3) N2—C4 1.380 (4)
Cu1—N1 1.971 (3) N2—H2C 0.8600
Cu1—O1 2.045 (2) C1—C2 1.487 (5)
Cu1—O1i 2.045 (2) C2—C3 1.529 (5)
Cu1—O3ii 2.433 (3) C2—H2A 0.9700
Cu1—O3iii 2.433 (3) C2—H2B 0.9700
S1—O3 1.439 (3) C3—H3A 0.9600
S1—O2 1.447 (3) C3—H3B 0.9600
S1—O1 1.479 (2) C3—H3C 0.9600
S1—C5 1.743 (3) C4—C5 1.359 (4)
O3—Cu1iv 2.433 (3) C4—C6 1.497 (5)
N1—C1 1.318 (4) C6—H6A 0.9600
N1—C5 1.385 (4) C6—H6B 0.9600
N2—C1 1.352 (4) C6—H6C 0.9600
N1i—Cu1—N1 180.00 (9) C4—N2—H2C 125.2
N1i—Cu1—O1 95.08 (10) N1—C1—N2 109.4 (3)
N1—Cu1—O1 84.92 (10) N1—C1—C2 126.5 (3)
N1i—Cu1—O1i 84.92 (10) N2—C1—C2 124.1 (3)
N1—Cu1—O1i 95.08 (10) C1—C2—C3 114.7 (3)
O1—Cu1—O1i 180.000 (1) C1—C2—H2A 108.6
N1i—Cu1—O3ii 88.44 (10) C3—C2—H2A 108.6
N1—Cu1—O3ii 91.56 (10) C1—C2—H2B 108.6
O1—Cu1—O3ii 86.90 (10) C3—C2—H2B 108.6
O1i—Cu1—O3ii 93.10 (10) H2A—C2—H2B 107.6
N1i—Cu1—O3iii 91.56 (10) C2—C3—H3A 109.5
N1—Cu1—O3iii 88.44 (10) C2—C3—H3B 109.5
O1—Cu1—O3iii 93.10 (10) H3A—C3—H3B 109.5
O1i—Cu1—O3iii 86.90 (10) C2—C3—H3C 109.5
O3ii—Cu1—O3iii 180.0 H3A—C3—H3C 109.5
O3—S1—O2 112.46 (16) H3B—C3—H3C 109.5
O3—S1—O1 112.61 (15) C5—C4—N2 104.3 (3)
O2—S1—O1 113.19 (16) C5—C4—C6 131.6 (3)
O3—S1—C5 108.32 (16) N2—C4—C6 124.1 (3)
O2—S1—C5 108.00 (16) C4—C5—N1 110.2 (3)
O1—S1—C5 101.46 (15) C4—C5—S1 131.3 (3)
S1—O1—Cu1 118.92 (14) N1—C5—S1 118.4 (2)
S1—O3—Cu1iv 131.33 (15) C4—C6—H6A 109.5
C1—N1—C5 106.6 (3) C4—C6—H6B 109.5
C1—N1—Cu1 138.6 (2) H6A—C6—H6B 109.5
C5—N1—Cu1 114.7 (2) C4—C6—H6C 109.5
C1—N2—C4 109.5 (3) H6A—C6—H6C 109.5
C1—N2—H2C 125.2 H6B—C6—H6C 109.5
O3—S1—O1—Cu1 128.60 (17) Cu1—N1—C1—C2 −1.4 (5)
O2—S1—O1—Cu1 −102.44 (19) C4—N2—C1—N1 −0.5 (4)
C5—S1—O1—Cu1 13.0 (2) C4—N2—C1—C2 178.2 (3)
N1i—Cu1—O1—S1 167.66 (17) N1—C1—C2—C3 177.2 (4)
N1—Cu1—O1—S1 −12.34 (17) N2—C1—C2—C3 −1.2 (5)
O3ii—Cu1—O1—S1 79.50 (17) C1—N2—C4—C5 0.3 (4)
O3iii—Cu1—O1—S1 −100.50 (17) C1—N2—C4—C6 −177.9 (3)
O2—S1—O3—Cu1iv 180.00 (18) N2—C4—C5—N1 0.0 (4)
O1—S1—O3—Cu1iv −50.7 (2) C6—C4—C5—N1 178.0 (3)
C5—S1—O3—Cu1iv 60.7 (2) N2—C4—C5—S1 −176.9 (3)
O1—Cu1—N1—C1 −170.2 (3) C6—C4—C5—S1 1.1 (6)
O1i—Cu1—N1—C1 9.8 (3) C1—N1—C5—C4 −0.2 (4)
O3ii—Cu1—N1—C1 103.0 (3) Cu1—N1—C5—C4 −177.8 (2)
O3iii—Cu1—N1—C1 −77.0 (3) C1—N1—C5—S1 177.1 (2)
O1—Cu1—N1—C5 6.3 (2) Cu1—N1—C5—S1 −0.5 (3)
O1i—Cu1—N1—C5 −173.7 (2) O3—S1—C5—C4 50.0 (4)
O3ii—Cu1—N1—C5 −80.5 (2) O2—S1—C5—C4 −72.1 (4)
O3iii—Cu1—N1—C5 99.5 (2) O1—S1—C5—C4 168.7 (3)
C5—N1—C1—N2 0.4 (4) O3—S1—C5—N1 −126.7 (3)
Cu1—N1—C1—N2 177.1 (2) O2—S1—C5—N1 111.3 (3)
C5—N1—C1—C2 −178.2 (3) O1—S1—C5—N1 −8.0 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x−1, y, z; (iii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1; (iv) x+1, y, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H2C···O2v 0.86 1.95 2.784 (4) 164.

Symmetry codes: (v) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: OM2453).

References

  1. Albada, G. A. van, Mutikainen, I., Turpeinen, U. & Reedijk, J. (2001). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 324, 273–277.
  2. Cai, J.-H., Jiang, Y.-M., Wang, X.-J. & Liu, Z.-M. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, m1659–m1661.
  3. Clark, R. C. & Reid, J. S. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 887–897.
  4. Doyle, G., Eriksen, K. A. & van Engen, D. (1983). Inorg. Chem. 22, 2892–2895.
  5. Han, J., Wu, H., Zhi, S., Li, Y. & Pan, Y. (2006). Anal. Sci. X-ray Struct. Anal. Online, 22, x299–x300.
  6. He, Q.-T., Li, X.-P., Liu, Y., Yu, Z.-Q., Wang, W. & Su, C.-Y. (2009). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 6156–6159. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Hubig, S. M., Lindeman, S. V. & Kochi, J. K. (2000). Coord. Chem. Rev. 200, 831–873.
  8. Jahn, H. & Teller, E. (1937). Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 220–235.
  9. Oxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlis PRO Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.
  10. Purdy, A. P., Gilardi, R., Luther, J. & Butcher, R. J. (2007). Polyhedron, 26, 3930–3938.
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Sreenivasulu, B., Vetrichelvan, M., Zhao, F., Gao, S. & Vittal, J. J. (2005). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 4635–4645.
  13. Timmermans, P. J. J. A., Mackor, A., Spek, A. L. & Kojic-Prodic, B. (1984). J. Organomet. Chem. 276, 287–295.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681103409X/om2453sup1.cif

e-67-m1303-sup1.cif (21KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681103409X/om2453Isup2.hkl

e-67-m1303-Isup2.hkl (84KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES