Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Aug 11;67(Pt 9):o2279. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811028340

Bis(guanidinium) cyananilate

Konstantin A Udachin a,*, Md Badruz Zaman a,b, John A Ripmeester a
PMCID: PMC3200825  PMID: 22065026

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, 2CH6N3 +·C8N2O4 2−, contains one half of a centrosymmetric 2,5-di­cyano-3,6-dioxocyclo­hexa-1,4-diene-1,4-diolate (cyananil­ate) anion and one guanidinium cation, which are connected by N—H⋯O and N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds into a three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For the synthesis and structure of 2,5-dihy­droxy-3,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (cyananilic acid), see: Zaman et al. (1996). For related cyananilic acid structures and background references, see: Zaman & Ripmeester (2010).graphic file with name e-67-o2279-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • 2CH6N3 +·C8N2O4 2−

  • M r = 308.28

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 19.4873 (17) Å

  • b = 3.6611 (3) Å

  • c = 20.2452 (18) Å

  • β = 112.887 (2)°

  • V = 1330.7 (2) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.12 mm−1

  • T = 173 K

  • 0.35 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) T min = 0.958, T max = 0.976

  • 7261 measured reflections

  • 1704 independent reflections

  • 1379 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.026

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.044

  • wR(F 2) = 0.131

  • S = 1.08

  • 1704 reflections

  • 124 parameters

  • 61 restraints

  • All H-atom parameters refined

  • Δρmax = 0.44 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.42 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker 2003); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ATOMS (Dowty, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811028340/gk2374sup1.cif

e-67-o2279-sup1.cif (13.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811028340/gk2374Isup2.hkl

e-67-o2279-Isup2.hkl (84KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811028340/gk2374Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O2i 0.95 (2) 2.20 (2) 3.000 (2) 142 (2)
N2—H2⋯O1i 0.95 (2) 2.21 (2) 3.020 (2) 143 (2)
N2—H1⋯O2 0.95 (2) 2.27 (2) 3.062 (2) 140 (2)
N3—H4⋯N1ii 0.92 (2) 2.14 (2) 3.025 (2) 160 (2)
N3—H3⋯O2 0.93 (2) 2.02 (2) 2.900 (2) 156 (2)
N4—H6⋯N1ii 0.92 (2) 2.38 (2) 3.199 (2) 148 (3)
N4—H5⋯O1i 0.95 (2) 1.95 (2) 2.826 (2) 151 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The reaction between cyananilic acid and guanidinium carbonate in methanol leads to the title compound. Since 1997, cyananilic acid (2,5-dicyano-3,6-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinone) has been explored due to its valuable physicochemical features. It is an organic acid that has Mott-insulator properties, and organic ferroelectricity (Zaman & Ripmeester, 2010). It forms three dimensional network through N-H···O and N-H···N hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2).

Experimental

Cyananilic acid has been synthesized according to our published method (Zaman et al., 1996) and purified by recrystallization from benzene. Light yellow compound was grown by slow evaporation of a methanol solution containing a 1:1 stoichiometric quantity of guanidinium carbonate (Aldrich, 98%) and cyananilic acid under ambient conditions. Compound decomposes at 593K.

Refinement

N-H distances were restrained to 0.95 (2) Å and all H atoms were refined isotropically. Non- hydrogen atoms were restrained to have the same Uij components with SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) instruction 'SIMU C1 < N4'.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. Fragments generated by symmetry codes: (a) 1/2 - x, 1,5 - y, 1 - z; (b) 1/2 - x, 1/2 + y, 1/2 - z; (c) 1/2 + x, 2.5 - y, 1/2 + z. Hydrogen bonds are shown with dashed lines.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Packing diagram of the hydrogen-bonded framework structure of the title compound viewed down the b axial direction of the unit cell, showing hydrogen-bonding associations as thin lines.

Crystal data

2CH6N3+·C8N2O42 F(000) = 640
Mr = 308.28 Dx = 1.539 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71070 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 280 reflections
a = 19.4873 (17) Å θ = 5.0–26°
b = 3.6611 (3) Å µ = 0.12 mm1
c = 20.2452 (18) Å T = 173 K
β = 112.887 (2)° Block, colourless
V = 1330.7 (2) Å3 0.35 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer 1704 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1379 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.026
ω scans θmax = 28.7°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) h = −26→26
Tmin = 0.958, Tmax = 0.976 k = −4→4
7261 measured reflections l = −27→27

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.131 All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.078P)2 + 0.709P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1704 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
124 parameters Δρmax = 0.44 e Å3
61 restraints Δρmin = −0.42 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.30409 (9) 0.9359 (5) 0.47852 (9) 0.0199 (4)
C2 0.23212 (9) 0.7966 (5) 0.42334 (8) 0.0194 (4)
C3 0.18096 (9) 0.6179 (5) 0.44716 (9) 0.0193 (4)
C4 0.11214 (10) 0.4852 (5) 0.39572 (9) 0.0213 (4)
C5 0.11254 (10) 0.8997 (5) 0.17992 (9) 0.0221 (4)
O1 0.34792 (8) 1.0991 (4) 0.45742 (7) 0.0288 (4)
O2 0.22010 (7) 0.8452 (4) 0.35861 (7) 0.0254 (3)
N1 0.05680 (9) 0.3773 (5) 0.35458 (9) 0.0297 (4)
N2 0.17845 (9) 0.7347 (5) 0.19774 (8) 0.0255 (4)
H2 0.1912 (16) 0.640 (8) 0.1606 (13) 0.044 (7)*
H1 0.2039 (15) 0.661 (8) 0.2463 (11) 0.046 (7)*
N3 0.08938 (9) 1.0023 (5) 0.23049 (9) 0.0279 (4)
H4 0.0455 (12) 1.133 (7) 0.2154 (13) 0.039 (7)*
H3 0.1219 (15) 0.963 (8) 0.2780 (11) 0.051 (8)*
N4 0.07052 (10) 0.9652 (5) 0.11139 (9) 0.0294 (4)
H6 0.0260 (13) 1.086 (8) 0.1016 (16) 0.057 (9)*
H5 0.0886 (17) 0.897 (8) 0.0757 (14) 0.048 (8)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0204 (8) 0.0214 (9) 0.0206 (8) −0.0006 (6) 0.0110 (7) 0.0004 (6)
C2 0.0201 (8) 0.0210 (8) 0.0184 (8) 0.0008 (6) 0.0088 (6) 0.0004 (6)
C3 0.0172 (8) 0.0214 (8) 0.0192 (8) −0.0015 (6) 0.0071 (6) −0.0006 (6)
C4 0.0209 (8) 0.0229 (9) 0.0218 (8) −0.0001 (7) 0.0102 (7) 0.0003 (7)
C5 0.0223 (9) 0.0237 (9) 0.0218 (8) −0.0009 (7) 0.0103 (7) −0.0002 (6)
O1 0.0267 (7) 0.0376 (8) 0.0259 (7) −0.0090 (6) 0.0145 (6) 0.0012 (6)
O2 0.0250 (7) 0.0345 (8) 0.0173 (6) −0.0013 (5) 0.0089 (5) 0.0023 (5)
N1 0.0226 (8) 0.0345 (10) 0.0293 (8) −0.0045 (7) 0.0072 (7) −0.0028 (7)
N2 0.0234 (8) 0.0307 (9) 0.0236 (8) 0.0043 (6) 0.0104 (6) −0.0008 (7)
N3 0.0248 (8) 0.0394 (10) 0.0214 (8) 0.0070 (7) 0.0110 (7) 0.0005 (7)
N4 0.0261 (8) 0.0421 (10) 0.0206 (8) 0.0089 (7) 0.0099 (7) 0.0007 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

C1—O1 1.246 (2) C5—N4 1.330 (2)
C1—C3i 1.431 (2) C5—N2 1.336 (2)
C1—C2 1.502 (2) N2—H2 0.95 (2)
C2—O2 1.251 (2) N2—H1 0.95 (2)
C2—C3 1.424 (2) N3—H4 0.923 (19)
C3—C4 1.426 (2) N3—H3 0.93 (2)
C4—N1 1.146 (2) N4—H6 0.92 (2)
C5—N3 1.324 (2) N4—H5 0.95 (2)
O1—C1—C3i 122.71 (15) N3—C5—N2 120.05 (17)
O1—C1—C2 118.30 (15) N4—C5—N2 120.02 (17)
C3i—C1—C2 118.99 (14) C5—N2—H2 118.3 (18)
O2—C2—C3 123.33 (15) C5—N2—H1 117.9 (17)
O2—C2—C1 118.10 (15) H2—N2—H1 122 (2)
C3—C2—C1 118.57 (14) C5—N3—H4 116.2 (16)
C2—C3—C4 119.52 (15) C5—N3—H3 117.0 (18)
C2—C3—C1i 122.44 (14) H4—N3—H3 126 (2)
C4—C3—C1i 118.04 (15) C5—N4—H6 117.1 (19)
N1—C4—C3 179.7 (2) C5—N4—H5 119.0 (19)
N3—C5—N4 119.93 (17) H6—N4—H5 124 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H2···O2ii 0.95 (2) 2.20 (2) 3.000 (2) 142 (2)
N2—H2···O1ii 0.95 (2) 2.21 (2) 3.020 (2) 143 (2)
N2—H1···O2 0.95 (2) 2.27 (2) 3.062 (2) 140 (2)
N2—H1···N2ii 0.95 (2) 2.64 (3) 3.319 (3) 129 (2)
N3—H4···N1iii 0.92 (2) 2.14 (2) 3.025 (2) 160 (2)
N3—H3···O2 0.93 (2) 2.02 (2) 2.900 (2) 156 (2)
N4—H6···N1iii 0.92 (2) 2.38 (2) 3.199 (2) 148 (3)
N4—H5···O1ii 0.95 (2) 1.95 (2) 2.826 (2) 151 (3)

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x, y+1, −z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: GK2374).

References

  1. Bruker (2003). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Dowty, E. (1999). ATOMS Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA.
  3. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  4. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Zaman, M. B., Morita, Y., Toyoda, J., Yamochi, H., Sekizaki, S. & Nakasuji, K. (1996). Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 287, 249–257.
  6. Zaman, M. B. & Ripmeester, J. A. (2010). Supramol. Chem 22, 582–585.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811028340/gk2374sup1.cif

e-67-o2279-sup1.cif (13.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811028340/gk2374Isup2.hkl

e-67-o2279-Isup2.hkl (84KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811028340/gk2374Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES