Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Sep 30;67(Pt 10):i58–i59. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811038451

Lithium cobalt(II) pyrophosphate, Li1.86CoP2O7, from synchrotron X-ray powder data

Hui Zhou a, Shailesh Upreti a, Natasha A Chernova a, M Stanley Whittingham a,*
PMCID: PMC3201481  PMID: 22065824

Abstract

Structure refinement of high-resolution X-ray powder diffraction data of the title compound gave the composition Li1.865CoP2O7, which is also verified by the ICP measurement. Two Co sites exist in the structure: one is a CoO5 square pyramid and the other is a CoO6 octa­hedron. They share edges and are further inter­connected through P2O7 groups, forming a three-dimensional framework, which exhibits different kinds of inter­secting tunnels containing Li cations and could be of great inter­est in Li ion battery chemistry. The structure also exhibits cation disorder with 13.5% Co residing at the lithium (Li1) site. Co seems to have an average oxidation state of 2.135, as obtained from the strutural stochiometry that closely supports the magnetic susceptibility findings.

Related literature

For related structures, see: Adam et al. (2008); Nishimura et al. (2010); Zhou et al. (2011). For related materials with Na+ and K+ cations, see: Erragh et al. (1991); Sanz et al. (1999); Beaury et al. (2004); Gopalakrishna et al. (2005); Bih et al. (2006); Guesmi et al. (2007). For related structural frameworks, see: Beaury et al. (2004); Fagginani & Calvo (1976); Sandström et al. (2003); Etheredge & Hwu (1995); El Maadi et al. (1995); Huang & Hwa (1998); Sanz et al. (1999); Erragh et al. (1998). Pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in Thompson et al. (1987) and Finger et al. (1994).

Experimental

Crystal data

  • CoLi1.865O7P2

  • M r = 245.82

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 9.76453 (4) Å

  • b = 9.69622 (4) Å

  • c = 10.95952 (4) Å

  • β = 101.7664 (2)°

  • V = 1015.83 (1) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Synchrotron radiation, λ = 0.413988 Å

  • μ = 0.89 mm−1

  • T = 297 K

  • irregular shape, 15 × 13 mm

Data collection

  • Advanced Photon Source diffractometer

  • Specimen mounting: kapton capillary

  • Data collection mode: transmission

  • Scan method: continuous

Refinement

  • R p = 0.057

  • R wp = 0.080

  • R exp = 0.049

  • R(F 2) = 0.04534

  • χ2 = 2.624

  • 24500 data points

  • 269 parameters

Data collection: Advance Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory; cell refinement: GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000); data reduction: Powder4 (Dragoe, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: GSAS; program(s) used to refine structure: GSAS; molecular graphics: CrystalMaker (Palmer, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811038451/br2175sup1.cif

e-67-00i58-sup1.cif (13.5KB, cif)

Rietveld powder data: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811038451/br2175Isup2.rtv

e-67-00i58-Isup2.rtv (2.2MB, rtv)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

Use of the Advanced Photon Source at the Argonne National Laboratory was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE–AC02-06CH11357. The research at Binghamton was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE–AC02-05CH11231, under the Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) Program subcontract # 6807148.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

A2MP2O7 is a large family, in which various frameworks are encountered consisting of MO6 octahedra (Fagginani et al., 1976; Sandström et.al., 2003) and MO4 polyhedra (Etheredge et al., 1995; Erragh et al., 1998; Sanz et al., 1999) interconnected through P2O7 groups (Fig. 1). Dimeric M2O10 units, built up of two edge-sharing MO6 octahedra, are only observed for some A2MP2O7 pyrophosphates (El Maadi et al. 1995; Huang et al. 1998) and dimeric M2O11 units(corner-shared MO6) seem to be much more rare, just observed for Na2CoP2O7 (Erragh et al. 1991). Two forms of structures were found for Na2CoP2O7 by Erragh et al. 1991: one is triclinic and another one is orthorhombic. The tetragonal structure of Na2CoP2O7 was reported by Sanz et al. 1999 and they found that the tetragonal form could be a derivative of the orthorhombic form, with a higher point symmetry for the former. In addition, the tetragonal structured Na2CoP2O7 was described by Guesmi et al. 2007. To our knowledge, the A2CoP2O7 with Li as cation has never been reported.

Here, we report a new Li containing solid with a three-dimensional framework (Fig. 2) crystallizing in the monoclinic space group P21/a. Its structure is similar to the recently reported Li2MnP2O7 (Adam et al. 2008), a new member of the A2MP2O7 family: original M2O9 units, built up of one MO5 trigonal bipyramid sharing one edge with one MO6 octahedron, sharing corners with P2O7 pyrophosphate groups to form undulating (M4P8O32) layers. A 3-D framework results from the interconnection between metal oxide and pyrophosphate groups, and the lithium cations are located in the tunnels thus formed (Fig 2). The structure of the related Fe-compound has been studied by us (Zhou et al. 2011) and Nishimura et al. (2010), as well as the electrochemical properties, which showed that it is a good candidate for the cathode material of lithium-ion batteries. The title compound also has the potential to work as the cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. We present here its crystal structure, as determined and refined from synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction data (Fig. 3).

Experimental

The powder sample was synthesized through a "wet" method based on mixing stoichiometric aqueous solutions of the precursors followed by thermal treatments. The general procedure involves the mixing of soluble precursors in distilled water followed by a slow evaporation through continuous stirring to dryness before annealing the resultant solids. The precursors for the synthesis were Li(CH3COO),Co(CH3COO)2. 4H2O,and NH4H2PO4, which were dissolved in 100 ml distilled water in a molar ratio of 2:1:2 (1.32 g, 2.49 g and 2.3 g respectively) to give a 0.02 molar lithium solution. The self-adjusted pH of all the solutions were found to be around 4.5. The solution was stirred and evaporated on a hot-plate in the hood followed by vacuum oven drying overnight at 363 K. The resulting solid was preheated in a H2/He (8.5°/91.5° by volume) atmosphere at 673 K for 4h to decompose the precursors followed by reheating under the same atmosphere up to 873 K for 16h with intermittent grinding to obtain the pink colored powder as final product. The sample was also analyzed with a Perkin-Elmer ICP-OES Optima 7000 DV for the elemental content. The average result of 3 analyses showed that the ratio of Li: Co: P is 1.85: 0.996:2. In addition, the SQUID magnetic study on the sample using a Quantum Design MPMS XL SQUID magnetometer showed that the effective magnetic moment of it is 5.23mBwhich is typical divalent Co.

Refinement

During structural refinement, occupancy factor for Li1 and Co3 were refined using constrains for atomic coordinate, atomic displacement parameter, and keeping the sum of occupancy facter equals to unity, which later were fixed to their close refined values as 0.73 and 0.27 respectively. Occupancy for Co1 was also observed to be deficient and fixed to it's closely refined value of 0.739 to 0.73, in final refinement cycles.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Thermal ellipsoid view of Li1.86CoP2O7 framework, having edge shared CoO5 and CoO6 interconnected through P2O7 moities.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Polyhedral view of unit cell packing showing tunneled structures containing Li ions, viewed along [100].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

X-ray Rietveld refinement profiles for Li1.86CoP2O7, data recorded at room temperature. Triangles mark the experimental points (red), solid line is the calculated profile (blue) and bottom trace shows the difference curve (green).

Crystal data

CoLi1.865O7P2 F(000) = 948.7
Mr = 245.82 Dx = 3.214 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/a Melting point: 1023 K
Hall symbol: -P 2yab Synchrotron radiation, λ = 0.413988 Å
a = 9.76453 (4) Å µ = 0.89 mm1
b = 9.69622 (4) Å T = 297 K
c = 10.95952 (4) Å Particle morphology: block
β = 101.7664 (2)° pink
V = 1015.83 (1) Å3 irregular, 15 × 13 mm
Z = 8 Specimen preparation: Prepared at 873 K and 101.325 kPa

Data collection

Advanced Photon Source diffractometer Specimen mounting: kapton capillary
Radiation source: Synchrotron Data collection mode: transmission
Si Scan method: continuous

Refinement

Least-squares matrix: full Excluded region(s): Reflections exceeding 2-theta 30 were omitted for the ease of refinement.
Rp = 0.057 Profile function: CW Profile function number 3 with 19 terms Pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in Thompson et al., (1987) and Finger et al. (1994).#1(GU) = 6.454 #2(GV) = -0.998 #3(GW) = 0.075 #4(GP) = 0.000 #5(LX) = 0.327 #6(LY) = 0.000 #7(S/L) = 0.0011 #8(H/L) = 0.0014 #9(trns) = 0.00 #10(shft)= 0.0000 #11(stec)= 0.00 #12(ptec)= 0.00 #13(sfec)= 0.00 #14(L11) = 0.067 #15(L22) = 0.070 #16(L33) = 0.058 #17(L12) = 0.010 #18(L13) = 0.010 #19(L23) = -0.004 Peak tails are ignored where the intensity is below 0.0010 times the peak Aniso. broadening axis 0.0 0.0 1.0
Rwp = 0.080 269 parameters
Rexp = 0.049 0 restraints
R(F2) = 0.04534 (Δ/σ)max = 0.03
χ2 = 2.624 Background function: GSAS Background function number 1 with 36 terms. Shifted Chebyshev function of 1st kind 1: 165.338 2: -31.4210 3: -8.19118 4: 6.28432 5: -10.8524 6: 14.3842 7: -8.22810 8: -0.949190 9: 13.3092 10: -14.8044 11: 4.75285 12: -1.09442 13: -0.739293 14: 5.47743 15: -2.87265 16: 1.05489 17: -3.22764 18: 1.21714 19: 0.537209 20: -3.25962 21: 2.18736 22: -1.12437 23: -2.15219 24: 3.41374 25: -3.88852 26: 1.14500 27: 3.06741 28: -3.05038 29: 0.529274 30: 0.298855 31: -4.06399 32: 1.50867 33: 1.15056 34: -2.20673 35: 0.550944 36: 5.540140E-02
24500 data points

Special details

Experimental. Data was collected with powder sample packed in Kapton capillary

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
Co1 0.25281 (15) 0.71550 (15) 0.18010 (14) 0.0137 (4)* 0.73
Co2 0.30165 (11) 0.43043 (11) 0.32719 (10) 0.0095 (3)*
P1 0.3790 (2) 0.6536 (2) 0.5771 (2) 0.0078 (5)*
P2 0.0613 (2) 0.9265 (2) 0.24116 (18) 0.0089 (5)*
P3 0.0210 (2) 0.4551 (2) 0.75861 (19) 0.0103 (5)*
P4 0.6144 (2) 0.7956 (2) −0.1113 (2) 0.0117 (6)*
O1 0.1615 (5) 0.8210 (5) 0.3113 (5) 0.0130 (14)*
O2 0.4709 (5) 0.7806 (5) −0.0792 (4) 0.0106 (12)*
O3 0.3911 (5) 0.8599 (4) 0.1472 (5) 0.0107 (13)*
O4 0.0302 (5) 0.8437 (5) 0.5592 (4) 0.0116 (14)*
O5 0.4330 (5) 0.4292 (5) −0.1033 (4) 0.0168 (13)*
O6 0.1790 (5) 0.8356 (5) −0.1511 (4) 0.0115 (13)*
O7 0.0189 (5) 0.4120 (4) 0.6224 (4) 0.0087 (13)*
O8 0.1866 (5) 0.2976 (4) 0.4146 (4) 0.0047 (12)*
O9 0.1013 (5) 0.6017 (4) 0.7747 (4) 0.0116 (13)*
O10 0.3827 (5) 0.5734 (5) 0.7087 (4) 0.0061 (12)*
O11 0.4152 (5) 0.5900 (4) 0.2661 (4) 0.0085 (13)*
O12 0.2775 (5) 0.5646 (5) 0.4803 (4) 0.0134 (13)*
O13 0.3713 (5) 1.0314 (5) −0.2124 (5) 0.0205 (15)*
O14 0.2204 (5) 0.6299 (5) −0.0018 (4) 0.0094 (13)*
Li1 1.3433 (3) 0.9255 (3) −0.0397 (3) 0.0087 (7)* 0.73
Li2 0.0807 (17) 0.1083 (15) 0.0261 (15) 0.009 (4)*
Li3 0.6728 (15) 0.0711 (14) 0.5465 (14) 0.029 (4)*
Li4 0.400 (2) 0.246 (2) 0.5725 (17) 0.065 (7)*
Co3 1.3433 (3) 0.9255 (3) −0.0397 (3) 0.0087 (7)* 0.27

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Co1—O1 2.105 (5) P2—O5v 1.524 (4)
Co1—O3 2.028 (4) P2—O10iv 1.584 (5)
Co1—O11 2.067 (4) P2—O11vi 1.516 (5)
Co1—O13i 2.226 (5) P3—O3ii 1.514 (5)
Co1—O14 2.123 (5) P3—O7 1.546 (5)
Co2—O4ii 2.030 (5) P3—O9 1.616 (4)
Co2—O6i 2.180 (5) P3—O13vii 1.563 (5)
Co2—O8 2.068 (4) P4—O2 1.519 (5)
Co2—O11 2.091 (4) P4—O6iii 1.524 (4)
Co2—O12 2.173 (4) P4—O9viii 1.582 (5)
Co2—O13i 2.128 (5) P4—O14iii 1.589 (5)
P1—O4iii 1.529 (5) Co3—O2ix 1.983 (5)
P1—O8iv 1.547 (4) Co3—O3ix 2.104 (6)
P1—O10 1.633 (5) Co3—O6ix 2.006 (6)
P1—O12 1.556 (4) Co3—O13ix 2.220 (5)
P2—O1 1.512 (5) Co3—O14x 2.154 (5)
O1—Co1—O3 100.14 (19) O8—Co2—O11 169.24 (17)
O1—Co1—O11 111.53 (19) O8—Co2—O13i 96.85 (19)
O1—Co1—O14 145.94 (21) O11—Co2—O13i 83.05 (18)
O3—Co1—O11 90.63 (18) O8iv—P1—O10 108.18 (27)
O3—Co1—O14 94.60 (20) O8iv—P1—O12 109.11 (29)
O11—Co1—O14 98.73 (18) O10—P1—O12 103.57 (26)
O4ii—Co2—O8 84.60 (18) O1—P2—O5v 111.42 (29)
O4ii—Co2—O11 95.03 (18) O1—P2—O10iv 106.90 (27)
O4ii—Co2—O13i 177.02 (20) O5v—P2—O10iv 104.39 (29)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z; (ii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1; (iii) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z; (iv) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1; (v) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z; (vi) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z; (vii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z+1; (viii) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z−1; (ix) x+1, y, z; (x) −x+3/2, y+1/2, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BR2175).

References

  1. Adam, L., Guesdon, A. & Raveau, B. (2008). J. Solid State Chem. 181, 3110–3115.
  2. Beaury, L., Derouet, J., Binet, J., Sanz, F. & Ruiz-Valero, C. (2004). J. Solid State Chem. 177, 1437–1443.
  3. Bih, H., Saadoune, I. & Mansori, M. (2006). Moroc. J. Condens. Matter, 7, 74–76.
  4. Dragoe, N. (2001). J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 535.
  5. El Maadi, A., Boukhari, A. & Holt, E. M. (1995). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 25, 531–536.
  6. Erragh, F., Boukhari, A., Elouadi, B. & Holt, E. M. (1991). J. Cryst. Spect. Res. 21, 321–326.
  7. Erragh, F., Boukhari, A., Sadel, A. & Holt, E. M. (1998). Acta Cryst. C54, 1373–1376.
  8. Etheredge, K. M. S. & Hwu, S. J. (1995). Inorg. Chem. 34, 1495–1499.
  9. Fagginani, R. & Calvo, C. (1976). Can. J. Chem., 54, 3319–3324.
  10. Finger, L. W., Cox, D. E. & Jephcoat, A. P. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 892–900.
  11. Gopalakrishna, G. S., Mahesh, M. J., Ashamanjari, K. G. & Shashidharaprasad, J. (2005). J. Cryst. Growth, 281, 604–610.
  12. Guesmi, A., Ouerfelli, N., Mazza, D. & Driss, A. (2007). Acta Cryst. A63, s277–s278.
  13. Huang, Q. & Hwu, S. J. (1998). Inorg. Chem. 37, 5869–5874.
  14. Larson, A. C. & Von Dreele, R. B. (2000). GSAS Report LAUR 86-748. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA.
  15. Nishimura, S., Nakamura, M., Natsui, R. & Yamada, A. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 13596–13597. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Palmer, D. (2005). CrystalMaker CrystalMaker Software Ltd, Yarnton, England.
  17. Sandström, M., Fischer, A. & Boström, D. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, i139–i141.
  18. Sanz, F., Parada, C., Rojo, J. M., Reuiz-Valero, C. & Saez-Puche, R. (1999). J. Solid State Chem. 145, 604–611.
  19. Thompson, P., Cox, D. E. & Hastings, J. B. (1987). J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 79–83.
  20. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.
  21. Zhou, H., Upreti, S., Chernova, N., Hautier, G., Ceder, G. & Whittingham, M. S. (2011). Chem. Mater. 23,293–300.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811038451/br2175sup1.cif

e-67-00i58-sup1.cif (13.5KB, cif)

Rietveld powder data: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811038451/br2175Isup2.rtv

e-67-00i58-Isup2.rtv (2.2MB, rtv)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES