Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Sep 30;133(42):16750–16753. doi: 10.1021/ja2066384

Oxidative group transfer to a trimanganese complex to form Mn66-E) (E = O, N) clusters featuring interstitial oxide and nitride functionalities

Alison R Fout 1, Qinliang Zhao 1, Dianne J Xiao 1, Theodore A Betley 1,
PMCID: PMC3201831  NIHMSID: NIHMS329033  PMID: 21942370

Abstract

Utilizing a hexadentate ligand platform, a trinuclear manganese complex of the type (HL)Mn3(thf)3 was synthesized and characterized ([HL]6− = [MeC(CH2N(C6H4-o-NH))3]6−). The pale orange, formally divalent trimanganese complex rapidly reacts with O-atom transfer reagents to afford the μ6-oxo complex (HL)2Mn66-O)(NCMe)4, where two trinuclear subunits bind the central O-atom and the (HL) ligands cooperatively bind both trinuclear subunits. The trimanganese complex (HL)Mn3(thf)3 rapidly consumes inorganic azide ([N3]NBu4) to afford a dianionic hexanuclear nitride complex [(HL)2Mn66-N)](NBu4)2, which subsequently can be oxidized with elemental iodine to (HL)2Mn66-N)(NCMe)4. EPR and alkylation of the interstitial light atom substituent were used to distinguish the nitride from the oxo complex. The oxo and oxidized nitride complexes gives rise to well-defined Mn(II) and Mn(III) sites, determined by bond-valence summation, while the dianionic nitride shows a more symmetric complex, giving rise to indistinguishable ion oxidation states based on crystal structure bond metrics.


We1 and others are investigating simple polynucleating ligands to stabilize multinuclear reaction sites to exploit the complexes’ expanded redox properties2 or to mimic polynuclear metallo-cofactors.3 Using a hexadentate amine-based platform, we have observed facile construction of polynuclear iron complexes featuring a broad range of ground state electronic structures and redox properties which vary as a function of the ligand architecture. Use of the sterically unencumbered proton-capped ligand (HL)6− ([HL]6− = [MeC(CH2NPh-o-NH)3]6−) gives rise to low-spin iron complexes which exhibit core-delocalized redox activity,1a whereas use of the bulkier silylamide ligand (tbsL)6− ([tbsL]6− = [1,3,5-C6H9(NPh-o-NSitBuMe2)3]6−) enables stabilization of high-spin complexes capable of group transfer reactivity to a tri-iron core,1b allowing us to explore the reactivity of the trinuclear species as a molecular unit. We posited use of the sterically less encumbered (HL) ligand platform might permit oxidative group transfer to a trinuclear core, which in turn could afford products of higher nuclearity. Herein, we present the facile oxidative group transfer chemistry to a trimanganese complex, giving rise to hex-anuclear Mn6 clusters that feature interstitial oxides and nitrides.

Reaction of 3/2 equivalents of Mn2(N(SiMe3)2)4 with one equivalent of HLH6 in thawing tetrahydrofuran affords the complex (HL)Mn3(thf)3 (1) in high yield (Scheme 1).4 Single crystals of 1, suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis, were grown from a concentrated THF solution that was allowed to stand at −35 °C. The solid-state molecular structure for 1 (see Figure S11) reveals a trigonal planar arrangement of three MnII ions supported by the [HL]6− ligand. Each MnII center resides in a square pyramidal coordination environment, with four amide nitrogens forming the basal plane and an oxygen from a molecule of tetrahydrofuran binding in the apical site. Unlike the (HL)Fe3(PMe2R)3 analogues, which feature close Fe–Fe contacts (2.299(2)Å),1a complex 1 shows much larger ion separation and a greater deviation from an equilateral triangle (Mn1–Mn2 2.8347(7), Mn1–Mn3 2.8291(8), Mn2–Mn3 2.7852(7) Å). Complex 1 more closely resembles the trimagnesium complex (HL)Mg3(thf)3, which features an average Mg···Mg separation of 2.847(1) Å and more suggestive of the metal ions residing at a distance reflective of simple ionic radii contact as opposed to involvement of metal-metal bonding.1a The solution magnetic moment obtained for 1H NMR silent 1 is 5.73(12) μB, well below the value expected for three magnetically isolated high-spin MnII ions (μeff = 10.25 μB). The low moment suggests the presence of antiferromagnetic superexchange interactions between MnII ions through the bridging amide ligands, similar to the behavior observed in related species.5,6 EPR spectra collected for 1 at 3, 77 and 300 K exhibit an intense isotropic signal with g = 2.016, consistent with the presence of a spin-frustrated system comprised of S = 5/2 MnII ions (see Figures S4–S5).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

With 1 in hand, we canvassed its reactivity with both O-atom and N-atom transfer reagents (Scheme 1). Reaction of 1 with 0.6 equivalents of pyridine N-oxide (or PhIO) results in an immediate color change from orange-red to dark brown. The oxidized product could be crystallized from slow evaporation of diethyl ether into concentrated acetonitrile solutions of the product at room temperature to yield (HL)2Mn66-O)(NCMe)4 (2), the molecular structure of which is shown in Figure 1a. Use of (4-trifluoromethyl)pyridine N-oxide7 allowed us to confirm consumption of the N-oxide via in situ 19F NMR and integration against an internal standard (C6H5CF3), suggesting the reaction is quantitative for the O-atom delivery despite the isolated yield of 82% (93% isolated yield using C5H5N-O).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Solid-state structures for (a) (HL)2Mn66-O)(NCMe)4 (2), (b) [(HL)2Mn66-N)](NnBu4)2 (3), and (a) (HL)2Mn66-N)(NCMe)4 (4) with the thermal ellipsoids set at the 50% probability level (hydrogen atoms, solvent molecules, and Bu4N cations in 3 omitted for clarity; Mn orchid, C black, H white, N blue, O red). Bond lengths (Å) for 2: Mn1-Mn2, 3.0593(6); Mn1-Mn2’, 3.1392(6); Mn1-Mn3, 3.1144(5); Mn2-Mn3, 3.0443(5); Mn2-Mn3’, 3.0954(5); Mn1-O, 2.270(4); Mn2-O, 2.111(4); Mn3-O, 2.229(4); for 3: Mn1-Mn2, 3.0726(8); Mn1-Mn2’, 3.0192(8); Mn1-Mn3, 3.0058(8); Mn1-Mn3’, 3.0693(7); Mn2-Mn3, 3.0120(9); Mn2-Mn3’, 3.0899(8); Mn1-N7, 2.1443(6); Mn2-N7, 2.1634(6); Mn3-N7, 2.1517(5); for 4: Mn1-Mn2, 3.057(2); Mn1-Mn2’, 3.137(2); Mn1-Mn3, 3.043(2); Mn1-Mn3’, 3.099(2); Mn2-Mn3, 3.116(2); Mn1-N7, 2.111(1); Mn2-N7, 2.267(1); Mn3-N7, 2.230(2).

Reaction of 1 with one equivalent of tetrabutylammonium azide in tetrahydrofuran at −35 °C results in consumption of 0.5 equivalents of azide, although a color change from 1 does not accompany the reaction as observed in the synthesis of 2. Cooling solutions of the reaction product in a mixture of hexane and benzene affords crystals of the solvent-free nitride [(HL)2Mn66-N)](NBu4)2 (3) (93%, Figure 1b), whereas crystallization in the presence of acetonitrile produces the solvated complex, [(HL)2Mn66-N)(NCMe)2](NBu4)2 (3b, see Figure S12). The presence of two NBu4 cations indicates the net oxidation to the Mn6 core is by a single electron. Treatment of 3 with a single equivalent of iodine rapidly oxidizes the cluster to afford the dark brown, neutral nitride (HL)2Mn66-N)(NCMe)4 (4) with generation of two equivalents of Bu4N+I. Complex 4 is nearly isostructural with its oxo analogue 2 (Figure 1c). Although crystalline yields for this do not exceed 30%, combustion analysis for the bulk material analyzed identically to that obtained for single crystal samples that were crushed and dried in vacuum (to remove solvent from the crystal lattice). While several examples of complexes bearing the [Mn66-O)] motif have been previously reported,8,9 the molecular nitrides 3 and 4 are rather unusual with only one example featuring the [Mn66-N)] unit reported in a solid-state structure.10

Each of the clusters 2–4 consist of an edge-bridged octahedral arrangement of Mn ions, with a μ6-oxo or nitride ligand situated at the center of the Mn6 core. This structure is similar to those observed for octahedral [HL2Fe6] clusters templated by the [HL]6− ligand, which do not feature interstitial atoms.1c,d For the neutral complexes 2 and 4, two distinct coordination environments are apparent for the Mn ions. First, two trans-disposed Mn sites reside in a square pyramidal coordination environment, with nitrogen atoms of the amide ligands comprising the basal plane and the interstitial bridging atom positioned in the apical site (see Table 1 for selected bond lengths). The remaining four Mn sites each bind a molecule of acetonitrile, which completes the octahedral coordination sphere. These sites show elongation of the Mn–X distances and expanded Mn–NHL interactions, reflective of the different electronic configurations for the square pyramidal MnII sites (dxy)1(dxz, dyz)2(dz2)1(dx2-y2)1 and the octahedral MnIII sites (dxy)1(dxz, dyz)2(dz2)1(dx2-y2)0. Bond valence summation corroborates this assignment with the square pyramidal sites consistent with MnIII, whereas the octahedral sites are consistent with a MnII formulation.11

Table 1.

Selected bond distances.

Complex Mn–X Mn–NH Mn–Nbase
2 Mn1 2.2694(4) 2.226(2) 2.245(2)
Mn2 2.1111(4) 1.997(2) 2.041(2)
Mn3 2.2289(5) 2.216(2) 2.246(2)
3b Mn1 2.1178(4) 2.197(2) 2.204(2)
Mn2 2.1333(4) 2.192(2) 2.226(2)
Mn3 2.2836(4) 2.217(2) 2.267(3)
4 Mn1 2.111(1) 1.991(6) 2.038(6)
Mn2 2.267(1) 2.227(6) 2.236(6)
Mn3 2.230 (2) 2.218(6) 2.248(6)

Unlike the neutral complexes 2 and 4, there is no obvious structural asymmetry to 3. The average Mn–Mn separation is 3.0497(9) Å, comparable to the average distances observed in 2. The bond metrics from Mn to both amide residues are consistent throughout the core (Mn–Nbase 2.218(3), Mn–NH 2.182(3) Å), and are similar to the divalent sites observed in 2. The Mn-nitride distances show little variance (Mn1–N7 2.1443(6), Mn2–N7 2.1634(6), Mn3-N7 2.1517(5) Å) indicating an equal interaction with the central nitride throughout the Mn6 core. Indeed, bond valence summation suggests the Mn ions in 3, as well as 3b (see Table 1), more closely resemble divalent manganese than trivalent manganese, suggesting the MnIII site is averaged over all positions in 3 and within the four solvent-free sites in 3b.

The solution magnetic moments for the series of compounds: 8.9(3) μB for 2, 8.2(1) for 3b, and 6.2(1) for 4 are all indicative of antiferromagnetic superexchange coupling between Mn ions through the bridging oxo/nitride and amide ligands. A strong isotropic signal (g = 2.17) is observed by EPR for toluene glasses of 3b over the temperature range 77–300 K, while cooling to 3 K reveals hyperfine coupling to the Mn ions (I = 5/2) and possibly N (see Figures 2 and S7-S8). The oxidized nitride 4 also exhibits a strong EPR signal with some hyperfine to Mn apparent, consistent with the 27 valence electron formulation; whereas the analogous oxo 2 (28 valence electrons) is EPR silent (Figure 2b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

X-band EPR (9.337GHz) for (a) 3b (3 K, toluene glass) and spectral overlay for 2 and 4 (77 K, toluene glass).

Given the close structural parameters between the neutral oxo 2 and nitride 4 and the difficulty distinguishing light atom substituents from X-ray analysis,3c we sought to unequivocally identify the light interstitial atom via chemical assay. Mass spectral analysis on complexes 2–4 proved problematic due to the sensitivity of the (HL)Mn3 units which easily hydrolyze. Thus, we sought to convert the light atom component into an species we could identify. Protonolysis of the complexes (camphorsulfonic acid, 25 equiv) followed by treatment with benzyl bromide (10 equiv) and base (K2CO3, 50 equiv) resulted in alkylation of the central light atom which could be identified by ESI MS. Alkylation of the nitride gave two dominant ions for Bn3NH+ (m/z 288.1741) and Bn2NH2+ (m/z 198.1275) that match the predicted isotope pattern and an authentic sample made from the same reaction conditions using the camphorsulfonic acid ammonium salt as a N source (see Figure S10), whereas the subjecting 2 to a similar treatment did not reveal those ion peaks. Furthermore, alkylation of 50% isotopically enriched 15N 3b (synthesized using the isotopically enriched azide [Na]15NNN) showed the parent ions for both 14N and 15N isotopologues of Bn3NH+ (m/z 288.1741; 289.1741) and Bn2NH2+ (m/z 198.1275; 199.1275).

These results demonstrate the ability to extend our synthetic protocols for the preparation of triiron complexes to prepare an analogous trimanganese complex. Moreover, this complex exhibits similar oxidative, atom-transfer reactivity to the related triiron complexes. The trinuclear manganese complex readily reacts with both O- and N-atom delivery agents to afford Mn66-E) (E = O, N) clusters, respectively, highlighting the efficacy of using well-defined trinuclear complexes to assemble polynuclear species of higher nuclearity. The clusters likely form via atom transfer to a trimanganese core with subsequent reaction with a second trinuclear complex to yield the hexanuclear products. Work is currently underway to understand the electronic structure of these complexes and canvass the scope of reactivity of the oxidized materials.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001
2_si_003

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Harvard University for financial support and the NIH for an NIH Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA fellowship for ARF. The authors would also like to thank Prof. Alan Saghatelian and Nawaporn Vinayavekhin for assistance in obtaining the mass spec data.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and spectral data for 1–4; selected crystallographic data and bond lengths for 1–4; CIF file for 1, 2, 3, 3b and 4; EPR spectra for 1 and 3b. This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.(a) Zhao Q, Betley TA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:709–712. doi: 10.1002/anie.201005198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Powers TM, Fout AR, Zheng SL, Betley TA. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:3336. doi: 10.1021/ja2003445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhao Q, Harris TD, Betley TA. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:8293. doi: 10.1021/ja2015845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Harris TD, Zhao Q, Hernández Sánchez R, Betley TA. Chem Commun. 2011;47:6344. doi: 10.1039/c1cc11561h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Adams RD. J Organometallic Chem. 2000;600:1. [Google Scholar]; (b) Suzuki H. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2002:1009. [Google Scholar]; (c) Dyson PJ. Coord Chem Rev. 2004;248:2443. [Google Scholar]; (d) Pap JS, DeBeer George S, Berry JF. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:10102. doi: 10.1002/anie.200804397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Tsui EY, Day MW, Agapie T. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:1668. doi: 10.1002/anie.201005232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Coucouvanis D. Acc Chem Res. 1981;14:201. [Google Scholar]; (b) Pecoraro VL, Baldwin MJ, Gelasco A. Chem Rev. 1994;94:807. [Google Scholar]; (c) Einsle O, Tezcan FA, Andrade S, Schmid B, Yoshida M, Howard JB, Rees DC. Science. 2002;297:1696. doi: 10.1126/science.1073877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Venkateswara Rao P, Holm RH. Chem Rev. 2004;104:527. doi: 10.1021/cr020615+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Lee SC, Holm RH. Chem Rev. 2004;104:1135. doi: 10.1021/cr0206216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Mukhopadhyay S, Mandal SK, Bhaduri S, Armstrong WH. Chem Rev. 2004;104:3981. doi: 10.1021/cr0206014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Mullins CS, Pecararo VL. Coord Chem Rev. 2008;252:416. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Hoffman BM, Dean DR, Seefeldt LC. Acc Chem Res. 2009;42:609. doi: 10.1021/ar8002128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anderson RA, Faegri K, Jr, Green JC, Haaland A, Lappert MF, Leung W-P, Rypdal K. Inorg Chem. 1988;27:1782. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hatnean JA, Raturi R, Lefebvre J, Leznoff DB, Lawes G, Johnson SA. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:14992. doi: 10.1021/ja065597i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tsui EY, Kanady JS, Day MW, Agapie T. Chem Commun. 2011;47:4189. doi: 10.1039/c0cc05608a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jiang B, Xiong W, Zhang X, Zhang F. Org Proc Res Dev. 2001;5:531. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Brown ID, Altermatt D. Acta Cryst. 1985;B41:244. [Google Scholar]; (b) Thorp HH. Inorg Chem. 1992;31:1585. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Mondal KC, Drew MGB, Mukherjee PS. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:5625. doi: 10.1021/ic0702670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Stamatatos TC, Pringouri KV, Abboud KA, Christou G. Polyhedron. 2009;28:1624. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eddine MN, Bertaut EF, Maunaye M. Acta Cryst B. 1977;B33:2696. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Cavaluzzo M, Chen Q, Zubieta J. Chem Commun. 1993:131. [Google Scholar]; (b) Brechin EK, Clegg W, Murrie M, Parsons S, Teat SJ, Winpenny REPJ. Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:7365. [Google Scholar]; (c) Koo BK, Lee U. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2001;22:103. [Google Scholar]; (d) Bagai R, Abboud KA, Christou G. Inorg Chem. 2008;47:621. doi: 10.1021/ic701971d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001
2_si_003

RESOURCES