Abstract
Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) signaling has been implicated in neural stem/precursor cell (NPC) proliferation. However, the molecular mechanisms involved, and their relationship to classical TLR-mediated innate immune pathways, remain unknown. Here, we report investigation of the mechanics of TLR3 signaling in neurospheres comprised of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-responsive NPC isolated from murine embryonic cerebral cortex of C57BL/6 (WT) or TLR3 deficient (TLR3−/−) mice. Our data indicate that the TLR3 ligand polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (PIC) negatively regulates NPC proliferation by inhibiting Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) signaling, that PIC induces apoptosis in association with inhibition of Ras-ERK signaling and elevated expression of Fas, and that these effects are TLR3-dependent, suggesting convergent signaling between the Shh and TLR3 pathways.
Introduction
PIC is a synthetic analog of viral double-stranded (ds) RNA that activates immune responses through two dsRNA sensors, TLR3 and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5). TLR3 senses PIC that has been internalized by endocytosis [1], [2]. Upon binding PIC, TLR3 signals through the adaptor protein, Toll/IL-1 resistance domain-containing adaptor-inducing IFN-β (TRIF). Interaction with the adaptor activates an array of transcription factors, including IFN regulatory factor (IRF) 3, IRF7, IRF1, and NFκB. These factors induce the expression of genes encoding type I interferon (IFN, i.e., IFN-α and IFN-β) and proinflammatory cytokines [3], [4].
Recent evidence suggests that TLR3 plays a role in neural development. TLR3 protein is present in mammalian brain cells in early embryonic stages of development and serves as a negative modulator of early embryonic NPC proliferation [5] and axonal growth [6]. In a mouse model of prenatal virus infection, we recently demonstrated that PIC-induced TLR3 activation inhibits embryonic NPC proliferation and decreases the number of neurons populating the upper layers of the cortex [7].
Single-cell suspensions of neural stem cells can be isolated from the embryonic telencephalon and propagated in vitro as suspended, spherical aggregates called neurospheres [8], [9]. Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-responsive NPC in neurospheres express the neuroepithelial stem cell marker, nestin, and are derived from rapidly-cycling, radial glia (RG) in the embryonic telencephalon. Neural stem cells can give rise to all three major cell types of the central nervous system: neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes [10], [11]. Accordingly, neurospheres contain a mixture of multipotent stem cells, proliferating precursor cells, postmitotic neurons and glia [12], [13], [14]. Primary neurospheres can be clonally passaged in vitro and provide a useful tool for analysis of the proliferation and self-renewal capacity of neural stem and precursor cells.
Regulation of the number of stem and precursor cells generated during neural development is important for control of brain size [15], [16]. Shh signaling has been implicated in cell proliferation and growth of embryonic and postnatal dorsal brain [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Shh is a member of the hedgehog family of secreted glycoproteins that binds the cell surface receptor Patched (Ptch). Binding of Shh and related ligands to Ptch abrogates its inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor, Smoothened (Smo), resulting in increased expression of Gli1 zinc-finger transcription factors [24], [25]. Three Gli proteins participate in the mediation of Shh signaling: Gli1 and Gli2 function as transcription activators, whereas the truncated form of Gli3, Gli3R, acts as a repressor [26], [27], [28], [29]. Shh-Gli signaling induces formation of Gli activators (Gli1, Gli2) that are imported into the nucleus to transactivate target genes. Multiple effects of Shh signaling on cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), Cdk inhibitors, cyclins, N-myc or the transcription factor, E2F, acting at different points of the cell cycle, may account for the proliferative effects of Shh [30], [31], [32], [33], [34].
In mammals, Shh is the only hedgehog family member expressed in the normal central nervous system [35]. Shh expression is layer-specific in perinatal neocortex and tectum. In the embryonic telencephalon, Shh is expressed within the mantle of the medial ganglionic eminence, the preoptic area and the amygdala [35], [36], [37]. Shh secreted from differentiated cells in the cortex can affect Gli1-positive, cycling precursor cells located at a distance; in addition, Shh can also be produced by the precursors themselves [18], [38], [39]. Genetic loss-of-function and knock-in studies wherein Gli genes have been ablated and then reintroduced have shown that the Shh-Gli pathway controls the growth and dorsal-ventral patterning of brain structures by regulating proliferation of neural stem cells through EGF signaling [40], [41], [42], [43], [44].
Shh signaling also plays a role in inducing apoptosis. Signaling via Ptch, a 12–transmembrane domain receptor of Shh, induces caspase-mediated apoptosis in neuroepithelial cells. The intracellular domain of Ptch harbors a cleavage site for caspase 3; cleavage at this site by caspase 3 exposes the proapoptotic domain of the receptor. In vitro treatment of neuroepithelial cells with recombinant Shh blocks Ptch-induced cell death [45], [46].
Here we demonstrate that: (i) PIC negatively regulates NPC proliferation by inhibiting Shh signaling, (ii) PIC induces apoptosis in association with inhibition of Ras-ERK signaling and elevated expression of Fas, and (iii) that these effects depend on TLR3 activation.
Results
Phenotypic analysis of EGF-responsive primary cortical neurospheres
Neurospheres were generated from dissociated cerebral cortex obtained from Wild-type (WT) or TLR3 knockout (TLR3−/−) C57BL/6 mouse embryos at GD14. The cellular composition of neurospheres was surveyed by FACS after culture for 1 or 7 days in proliferation medium supplemented with EGF (20 ng/ml). After 1 day of culture, 65.2 ± 1.8% of WT cells expressed GFAP, a marker for astrocytes; 22.6 ± 3.0% expressed tubulin-β-III, a marker for young postmitotic neurons; 4.8 ± 1.5% expressed nestin, a marker for neuroepithelial stem cells ( Fig. 1a ; values represent mean ± SEM) [47], [48], [49]. After 7 days, the percentage of GFAP+ and tubulin-β-III+ cells in WT neurospheres decreased to 11.8 ± 0.6% and 7.5% ± 1.2%, respectively, whereas the percentage of nestin+ precursors increased to 55.9 ± 2.0% ( Fig. 1a ; values represent mean ± SEM). We observed similar percentages of cells in day 7 neurosphere cultures derived from TLR3 knockout mice (TLR3−/−). After 7 days of culture, 63.0±2.0% of TLR3−/− neurosphere cells expressed nestin; 12.6±2.0% expressed GFAP; and 8.4±1.0% expressed tubulin-β-III, suggesting that neurospheres derived from TLR3−/− mice are equally responsive to EGF ( Fig. 1a ; values represent mean ± SEM).
To further characterize the phenotype of nestin+ NPC, day 7 WT and TLR3−/− neurosphere cells were analyzed by FACS for expression of PAX6 and TBR2, two transcription factors expressed in vivo by NPC during mid- and late cortical neurogenesis [50], [51], [52]. 46.2 ± 2.8% of WT and 62.3 ± 2.0% of TLR3−/− precursor cells co-expressed nestin and PAX6; 2.2 ± 0.07% WT and 2.6 ± 0.08% of TLR3−/− cells co-expressed nestin and TBR2. PAX6 is a radial glial (RG) marker; thus, these results indicate that the majority of the nestin+ neurosphere-derived cells in these dorsal telencephalon cultures are self-renewing NPC ( Fig. 1b ; values represent mean ± SEM). In WT neurosphere cells, intracellular expression of TLR3 was observed (in nestin+, PAX6+, and TBR2+ NPC populations ( Fig. 1c ).
The neurosphere culture model contains cells at various stages of differentiation [8], [9]. Whereas nestin-positive precursor cells are typically located toward the outside of the sphere, GFAP-positive cells are found in the center. Tubulin-β-III-positive neurons are less common and tend to be evenly distributed [53]. In our experiments, neurospheres were detected after one week of culture of WT and TLR3−/− GD14 cortices (Fig. S1). The number of nestin-positive cells was decreased by 50% in secondary versus primary WT neurospheres (Fig. S2) and decreased continuously with subsequent passages (data not shown) [54]. Thus, our experiments were performed with primary neurospheres wherein nestin expression was maximal. When dissociated and transferred to differentiating conditions for 7 days, WT primary neurospheres lost their spherical shape and flattened to form monolayers (Fig. S3a). FACS analysis using cell lineage-specific antisera showed that WT neurospheres were multipotent and capable of giving rise to neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. During differentiation, WT cells expressed GFAP, tubulin-β-III, and O4, markers characteristic for astrocytes, neurons and oligodendrocyte populations, respectively (Fig. S3b–f).
PIC negatively regulates neurosphere-derived NPC proliferation in a TLR3-dependent manner
To assess the direct role of TLR3 signaling on NPC proliferation, we used primary cortical neurosphere cultures obtained from GD14 WT and TLR3-deficient (TLR3−/−) embryos. Neurospheres maintained in proliferation media for 7 days were treated with the TLR3 ligand, PIC (50 µg/ml), for 24 hours; BrdU was added for the final 12 hours of the culture. Proliferative responses of neurosphere-derived cells were assessed by flow cytometric measurement of labeled BrdU. Our results indicate that BrdU was incorporated into the majority of nestin+ cells, and that PIC exposure was associated with a reduced percentage of BrdU+nestin+ precursor cells in WT neurosphere cultures as compared to PBS-treated WT control cultures (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.04; relative to PBS-treated WT control group; Fig. 2a, b ). PIC treatment resulted in a concomitant increase in the percentage of BrdU-negative GFAP+ and Tubulin-β-III+ subpopulations in the WT neurospheres (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.04; relative to PBS-treated WT control group; Fig. 2c, e ). No significant differences were observed in expression levels of GFAP and Tubulin-β-III markers in WT neurospheres (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.29; Fig. 2d ). Neurosphere cultures derived from TLR3−/− mice were used to assess the role of TLR3 signaling in the PIC-mediated inhibition of NPC proliferation. No differences were observed in the percentage of BrdU+nestin+ precursor cells in PIC-treated TLR3−/− neurospheres as compared to PBS-treated TLR3−/− control cultures (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.26; Fig. 2a, b ). Taken together, these results implicate TLR3 signaling in PIC-induced impairment of proliferation of EGF-responsive NPC in cortical neurospheres.
PIC decreases neurosphere-derived neural precursor cell proliferation by inhibiting Shh signaling
Shh signaling regulates the proliferation of EGF-responsive precursor cells in the developing mouse neocortex [41]. To test whether Shh signaling is active in the EGF-responsive precursor cells found in neurospheres, we examined the expression of Shh pathway receptors and targets in 7-day cultures from GD14 embryos. FACS analysis revealed that WT and TLR3−/− nestin+ neurosphere cells expressed the membrane-associated Shh receptor, Ptch ( Fig. 3a ). No change in the percentage of nestin+ Ptch+ cells was observed with PIC treatment. 11.0–15.0% of nestin+ cells expressed Ptch in both PBS- and PIC-treated WT cells ( Fig. 3a ). WT and TLR3−/− Nestin+ cells expressed the Shh-regulated transcription factor, Gli1 ( Fig. 3b, c ). To test the effect of PIC on Shh signaling in EGF-responsive NPC, GD14 WT and TLR3−/− cortical neurospheres were grown in EGF-supplemented medium for 7 days, and treated with either PIC or PBS for the last 24 hours of the culture period. FACS analysis of WT neurospheres indicated that PIC treatment decreased the percentage of Gli1+nestin+ cells (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.04; relative to PBS-treated WT control group; Fig. 3b, d ) and the mean fluorescent intensity of Gli1 expression (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.04; relative to PBS-treated WT control group; Fig. 3c ). In contrast, no differences were observed between TLR3−/− cells treated with PIC or PBS (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.51; relative to PBS-treated TLR3−/− control group; Fig. 3b–d ). Together, these results suggest that PIC-mediated inhibition of Shh signaling in nestin+ precursor cells may be occurring downstream to Ptch and that this inhibition requires TLR3 expression.
Shh pathway activation reverses PIC-mediated inhibition of neurosphere-derived NPC proliferation
Induction of Shh signaling with recombinant Shh protein regulates proliferation of neural stem cells [41]. GD14 WT-derived primary cortical neurospheres grown for 7 days in media containing 5 ng/ml of EGF supplemented with 5 nM recombinant Shh showed increased proliferation as measured by BrdU labeling ( Fig. 4a ). PIC treatment inhibited BrdU labeling in WT neurospheres cultured in 5 ng/ml of EGF (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.04; relative to PBS-treated WT control group; Fig. 4b, d ). Recombinant Shh treatment in the presence of 5 ng/ml of EGF abrogated the PIC-mediated reduction in BrdU labeling (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.52; relative to Shh and PBS-treated WT control group; Fig. 4c, d ). Under culture conditions with a higher concentration of EGF (20 ng/ml) in the media, Shh did not have this effect (data not shown), presumably because stimuli for proliferation were already maximal [41]. These results indicate that PIC-mediated inhibition of NPC proliferation can be abrogated by stimulating the Shh pathway under culture conditions wherein EGF concentration is sub maximal. To test for direct evidence that PIC effect is due to Shh signaling inhibition, neurosphere cultures were treated with cyclopamine, a small molecule inhibitor of Shh signaling. Cyclopamine is a steroidal alkaloid that specifically inhibits Shh pathway activation by binding directly to the multipass transmembrane protein, Smo, and regulating its function [55]. WT cortical neurospheres were grown in 5 ng/ml of EGF supplemented with 5 µM of cyclopamine or ethanol (vehicle control group) for 7 days, and treated with PIC or PBS for the last 24 hours of the culture period. FACS analysis of WT neurospheres indicated that PIC treatment in the presence of cyclopamine and EGF decreased the percentage of Gli1+nestin+ cells when compared to PBS/ethanol-treated vehicle control group ( Fig. 5a ). PIC treatment in the presence of cyclopamine and EGF did not result in any additive effects in the inhibition of Gli1 in comparison to cells that were treated with PIC alone ( Fig. 5a ). These observations suggest: (i) a lack of synergy between PIC and cyclopamine on Shh signaling, and (ii) in WT neurosphere cells, PIC-mediated effects in the Shh signaling pathway may be on effectors that are downstream to Ptch and Smo. Furthermore, no differences in percentages of Gli1+nestin+ cells were observed in PIC-treated WT cells cultured in the presence of recombinant Shh (5 nM) and EGF (5 ng/ml) in comparison to cells from the PBS-treated WT control group ( Fig. 5b ), confirming our earlier observation that in neurosphere cultures, under conditions of sub-maximal EGF stimulation, recombinant Shh treatment abrogates the PIC-mediated effects on Shh signaling.
PIC induces apoptosis in primary cortical neurospheres
To test whether PIC altered viability of NPC, we measured apoptosis in GD14 WT and TLR3−/− neurospheres after 7 days of culture in proliferation medium supplemented with EGF (20 ng/ml) that included 24 hours of treatment with PIC or PBS. PIC resulted in a close to two-fold increase in the percentage of annexin V+ cells in WT neurospheres (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.04; relative to PBS-treated WT control group; Fig. 6a, c ). In contrast, no significant differences were observed between PIC- and PBS-treated TLR3−/− neurospheres (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.27; relative to PBS-treated TLR3−/− control group; Fig. 6b, c ). These results indicate that PIC augments apoptosis in NPC and that the effect is TLR3-dependent.
PIC prevents EGF/Shh-mediated ERK activation and induces Fas expression in primary cortical neurospheres
To elucidate the molecular basis by which PIC mediates inhibition of Shh pathway activation, we examined the effects of PIC on the Ras-ERK pathway, a downstream effector of Shh and EGF signaling in GD14 WT primary cortical neurospheres cultured in the presence of EGF. PIC treatment decreased the percentage of neurosphere-derived cells expressing phosphorylated-ERK, the active form of the protein (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.02; relative to PBS-treated WT control group; Fig. 7a, e ). The mean fluorescent intensity of phosphorylated-ERK was also reduced in PIC-treated cells (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.04; relative to PBS-treated WT control group; Fig. 7c ). Consistent with studies reporting regulation of Fas (CD95) expression via the Ras-ERK pathway [56], [57], [58] Fas expression was elevated in WT cortical NPC treated with PIC (n = 12; Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.02; relative to PBS-treated WT control group; Fig. 7b, d, f ). Collectively, these results suggest that inhibition of Ras-ERK signaling by PIC may lead to elevated levels of Fas and Fas-mediated apoptosis in NPC. To elucidate that Poly IC-mediated effects are dependent on Shh, neurosphere cultures were grown for 7 days in media supplemented with recombinant Shh (5 nM) in the presence of sub-maximal concentration of EGF (5 ng/ml) and treated with PIC or PBS as described above. Recombinant Shh pre-treatment in the presence of EGF abrogated PIC-mediated inhibition of phospho-ERK expression in WT neurosphere cells as compared with PIC-treated cells cultured in the presence of EGF alone ( Fig. 8a, b ).
Discussion
The majority of EGF-responsive nestin+ cells in the cortical neurosphere model correspond to the rapidly-cycling, PAX6+ RG stem cells and support the hypothesis that stem cells are contained within the neuroepithelial-radial glia-astrocyte lineage [59]. We recently reported that PAX6+ RG cells express TLR3 in embryonic neocortex at GD18 [7]. Results reported here confirm that TLR3 receptors are expressed on NPC and regulate PIC signaling. PIC treatment inhibited the proliferation of NPC and increased the ratio of GFAP+- and βIII-tubulin+-differentiated subpopulations in primary WT neurospheres. Although we observed comparable NPC multipotency in control and PIC-treated WT neurospheres (data not shown), we cannot ascertain from current data whether PIC induces NPC differentiation.
The Ras-MEK-ERK signaling pathway is involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation. EGF stimulates cell proliferation via the Ras-MEK-ERK signaling cascade [60], [61], [62]. Furthermore, Ras-ERK activation is implicated both in the maintenance of tumor stem cells [63], and in regulation of Fas transcription [56], [64]. Our results in EGF-responsive NPC indicate that Shh signaling machinery is present in nestin+ NPC in primary cortical neurospheres. PIC treatment inhibited Shh signaling in WT primary neurospheres, resulting in reduced proliferation of NPC. PIC also induced apoptosis in the WT neurospheres. In Figure 9, we present a model of PIC-mediated effects on NPC. PIC inhibits the Shh-mediated Ras-MEK-ERK signaling pathway, resulting in reduced MEK (data not shown) and ERK phosphorylation and increased Fas expression. Thus, PIC-mediated inhibition of Ras-MEK-ERK activation may contribute to both suppression of proliferation and induction of apoptosis.
PIC signals via a TLR3-dependent NFκB pathway to induce IFN-α, IFN-β and proinflammatory cytokines [3], [65]. Li and colleagues have shown that IFN-α inhibits the Shh-activated Ras-MEK-ERK pathway and induces apoptosis in human cancer cells [46]. Our experiments with neurospheres from TLR3-deficient mice indicate that PIC interferes with Shh signaling and NPC proliferation in a TLR3-dependent manner: PIC treatment of TLR3−/− neurospheres neither induced apoptosis nor decreased proliferation. The factor(s) that mediate cross-talk between TLR3 and Shh signaling cascades are unknown. However, a recent study describing Shh as a direct transcriptional target of NFκB [66] suggests that the NFκB pathway may be pivotal.
Brain structures require Shh for normal proliferation and dorsal-ventral patterning [67]. In humans, loss of Shh signaling causes holoprosencephaly, a birth defect characterized by failure of forebrain development [68], [69]. Conversely, enhanced Shh signaling has been implicated in cancers of prostate, pancreas, muscle and skin as well as the brain [70], [71]. In mice, development of the telencephalon commences at GD11 and peaks between GD14 and 16; this time period is characterized by rapid expansion of NPC followed by generation of neurons through asymmetric divisions [72]. During this critical period of central nervous system development, aberrant TLR3 activation may have profound implications for NPC proliferation, leading to deficits in telencephalon morphogenesis. These findings provide a new mechanistic framework for understanding the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders associated with gestational and perinatal infections.
Materials and Methods
Mice
Ethics Statement
All mice were handled in accordance with the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animals Care international guidelines, with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Columbia University under approval ID AC-AAAA4827. The Columbia University IACUC reviewed and approved this study under ID AC-AAAA4827.
Wild-type (WT) pregnant C57BL/6 mice at gestational day (GD) 14 were obtained from Harlan Laboratories (Dublin, VA). Congenic TLR3 deleted mice (TLR3−/−) on a C57BL/6 background were obtained by repeated breeding of heterozygous B6;129S1-Tlrtm1 Flv/J TLR3 knockout mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) with WT C57BL/6 for ten generations. Heterozygous mice, carrying the TLR3 deletion were identified at each generation by PCR analysis of total genomic DNA using the following primer sets: NEO_F CTTGGGTGGAGAGGCTATTC, NEO_R AGGTGAGATGACAGGAGATC, TLR3_F ACTCCTTTGGGGGACTTTTG and TLR3_R CAGGTTCGTGCAGAAGACAA. After 10 generations, heterozygous mice were inter-crossed, and congenic homozygous TLR3−/− mice on a C57BL/6 background were selected to maintain the colony. Time-pregnant TLR3−/− mice were obtained by selecting vaginal plug positive (GD 0) dams from breeding pairs of homozygous TLR3−/− mice.
Primary Neurosphere Cultures
Embryonic cortical neurosphere cultures were obtained using the method of Reynolds and colleagues [8], [9] with minor modifications. Embryos were obtained from cesarean sections of GD14 pregnant dams sacrificed under anesthesia. The embryos were sacrificed by decapitation and the dorsal telencephalon was dissected, trimmed and stripped of meninges in cold Hanks solution containing 5 mM HEPES at pH.8.0, penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and 0.8% D-glucose (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The tissue was then mechanically dissociated by gentle trituration with fire-polished, glass Pasteur pipettes to yield single cell suspensions. The cells were incubated to generate primary neurospheres in NeuroCult NSC proliferation medium supplemented with 20 ng/ml of human epidermal growth factor (EGF) and Neurocult NSC proliferation supplements (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). The cell suspensions were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 atmosphere in 10 ml at a concentration of 1×105 cells/ml in T-25 tissue culture flasks and left undisturbed for 7 days to generate neurospheres. For experiments with recombinant Shh protein or cyclopamine, cells were cultured in NeuroCult NSC proliferation media containing 5 ng/ml of EGF and supplemented with either 5×nM of recombinant human Shh (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) or 5 µM of cyclopamine (Toronto Research Chemicals Inc., Ontario, Canada).
PIC treatment
Polyinosinic-polycytidylic potassium salt (Sigma Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in PBS was heated to 55°C for 5×min and allowed to cool at room temperature. dsRNA concentration was measured by UV spectroscopy [65]. Neurosphere cultures maintained in proliferation medium for 7 days were treated with 50 µg/ml of PIC for the last 24 hours of the culture period. We observed robust phenotypic changes in neurosphere cells that were treated with 50 µg/ml of PIC without inducing significant loss of viability; hence, all phenotypic testing was performed with cultures treated with this dose of poly I:C..
Antibodies
Primary antibodies included: mouse anti-BrdU (1∶50, Clone: B44, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), mouse anti-PAX6 (1∶100, developed by Atsushi Kawakami and obtained from Development Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa, Iowa city, IA), mouse anti-TBR2-PE (1∶100, Clone: 21 Mgs8, eBioscience, San Diego, CA), chicken anti-mouse serum TLR3 (1∶500, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), rat serum anti-mouse TLR3 (1∶500, eBioscience, San Diego, CA), mouse anti-Nestin-Alexa Fluor 647 (1∶20, Clone: 25/Nestin, BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA), mouse anti-Tubulin-β-III-NorthernLights 637 (1∶20, Clone: TuJ-1, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), mouse anti-GFAP-Alexa Fluor 488 (1∶50, Clone: 131-15019, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), mouse anti-oligodendrocyte marker O4-PE (10μl, Clone: O4, R&D Systems), goat anti-mouse Patched (1∶20, R&D Systems), Rat anti-Gli1-FITC (1∶100, R&D Systems), rabbit anti-mouse Phospho-MEK1/2 (1∶100, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), rabbit anti-mouse Phospho-ERK (1∶100, Cell Signaling Technology), and hamster anti-mouse CD95-FITC (1∶100, Clone: Jo2, BD Pharmingen). Secondary antibodies included donkey anti-mouse-APC, donkey anti-goat-PE, donkey anti-mouse-FITC, donkey anti rat-FITC, (1∶1000, Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, MA), goat anti-rat-PE (1∶100, R&D Systems), and goat anti-rabbit-APC (1∶100, R&D Systems). Flow cytometry isotype controls were PE rat IgG2a κ, FITC rat IgG2a κ, APC mouse IgG2a κ, FITC mouse IgG1 κ, and APC mouse IgG1 κ isotype (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA).
Flow cytometry
BrdU was added to cortical neurosphere cultures at 10 µM, 12 hours prior to culture processing. Neurospheres were pelleted by centrifugation at 800 xg for 5 minutes. Cell pellets were then suspended in 2 ml of trypLE stable trypsin replacement enzyme (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and incubated at 37°C for 15 minutes. The neurosphere suspensions were pelleted again and resuspended in 2 ml of NeuroCult NSC proliferation media supplemented with 250 U/ml of DNAse I (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Single cell suspensions were obtained by trituration with fire-polished glass Pasteur pipettes. Intracellular BrdU was measured using the BrdU Flow Kit (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA). Cells were resuspended in 50 µl of staining buffer (PBS with 1.0% FBS). Cells were fixed, permeabilized, and treated with DNAse (30 µg per tube) to expose incorporated BrdU. Cells were resuspended in 50 µl of BD Perm/fix buffer containing anti-BrdU-FITC antibodies (1∶50) and relevant antibodies specific for detection of intracellular antigens, followed by staining with secondary antibodies. Cells were washed and resuspended in staining buffer and analyzed by multicolor flow cytometry on a LSRII Analyzer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). After gating to exclude dead cells and debris based on forward and side scatter, data were analyzed using FACS DiVa acquisition software (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and FlowJo6.1 (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
Apoptosis assays
Cell suspensions of cortical neurospheres were washed twice with PBS, resuspended in 0.1 ml Annexin V binding buffer (BD Biosciences), and incubated with 5 µl of FITC-conjugated Annexin V (BD Biosciences) and 10 µl of propidium iodide (PI) for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were immediately analyzed by flow cytometry on a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson). Data were obtained using CellQuest acquisition software (Becton Dickinson) and analyzed using FlowJo6.1 (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA). Cells stained with Annexin V-FITC alone and PI alone were used as controls.
Statistical analysis
StatView version 5.0.1 software (Windows version; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Mann–Whitney U-tests (independent variable: dose group) were used for group comparisons requiring nonparametric analytic approaches. For all tests, statistical significance was assumed where p<0.05.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Gabriel Villar and Robert Serge for technical assistance.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work was supported by awards from the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH-NIAID), 5 U01 and AI070411 to WIL, and the Department of Defense. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Ishii KJ, Koyama S, Nakagawa A, Coban C, Akira S. Host innate immune receptors and beyond: making sense of microbial infections. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;3:352–363. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Matsumoto M, Seya T. TLR3: interferon induction by double-stranded RNA including poly(I:C). Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:805–812. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alexopoulou L, Holt AC, Medzhitov R, Flavell RA. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature. 2001;413:732–738. doi: 10.1038/35099560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, Hoshino K, Kaisho T, et al. Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science. 2003;301:640–643. doi: 10.1126/science.1087262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lathia JD, Okun E, Tang SC, Griffioen K, Cheng A, et al. Toll-like receptor 3 is a negative regulator of embryonic neural progenitor cell proliferation. J Neurosci. 2008;28:13978–13984. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2140-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cameron JS, Alexopoulou L, Sloane JA, DiBernardo AB, Ma Y, et al. Toll-like receptor 3 is a potent negative regulator of axonal growth in mammals. J Neurosci. 2007;27:13033–13041. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4290-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.De Miranda J, Yaddanapudi K, Hornig M, Villar G, Serge R, et al. Induction of Toll-Like Receptor 3-Mediated Immunity during Gestation Inhibits Cortical Neurogenesis and Causes Behavioral Disturbances. MBio. 2010;1 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00176-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reynolds BA, Weiss S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science. 1992;255:1707–1710. doi: 10.1126/science.1553558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reynolds BA, Weiss S. Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF-responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell. Dev Biol. 1996;175:1–13. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eriksson C, Bjorklund A, Wictorin K. Neuronal differentiation following transplantation of expanded mouse neurosphere cultures derived from different embryonic forebrain regions. Exp Neurol. 2003;184:615–635. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00271-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Irvin DK, Dhaka A, Hicks C, Weinmaster G, Kornblum HI. Extrinsic and intrinsic factors governing cell fate in cortical progenitor cultures. Dev Neurosci. 2003;25:162–172. doi: 10.1159/000072265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Suslov ON, Kukekov VG, Ignatova TN, Steindler DA. Neural stem cell heterogeneity demonstrated by molecular phenotyping of clonal neurospheres. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14506–14511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212525299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parmar M, Skogh C, Englund U. A transplantation study of expanded human embryonic forebrain precursors: evidence for selection of a specific progenitor population. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2003;23:531–543. doi: 10.1016/s1044-7431(03)00097-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reynolds BA, Rietze RL. Neural stem cells and neurospheres--re-evaluating the relationship. Nat Methods. 2005;2:333–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rakic P, Caviness VS., Jr Cortical development: view from neurological mutants two decades later. Neuron. 1995;14:1101–1104. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90258-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Caviness VS, Jr, Takahashi T, Nowakowski RS. Numbers, time and neocortical neuronogenesis: a general developmental and evolutionary model. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:379–383. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93933-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dahmane N, Ruiz I, Altaba A. Sonic hedgehog regulates the growth and patterning of the cerebellum. Development. 1999;126:3089–3100. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.14.3089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dahmane N, Sanchez P, Gitton Y, Palma V, Sun T, et al. The Sonic Hedgehog-Gli pathway regulates dorsal brain growth and tumorigenesis. Development. 2001;128:5201–5212. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.24.5201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wallace VA. Purkinje-cell-derived Sonic hedgehog regulates granule neuron precursor cell proliferation in the developing mouse cerebellum. Curr Biol. 1999;9:445–448. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80195-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wechsler-Reya RJ, Scott MP. Control of neuronal precursor proliferation in the cerebellum by Sonic Hedgehog. Neuron. 1999;22:103–114. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80682-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lai K, Kaspar BK, Gage FH, Schaffer DV. Sonic hedgehog regulates adult neural progenitor proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:21–27. doi: 10.1038/nn983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ericson J, Rashbass P, Schedl A, Brenner-Morton S, Kawakami A, et al. Pax6 controls progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in response to graded Shh signaling. Cell. 1997;90:169–180. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80323-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Favaro R, Valotta M, Ferri AL, Latorre E, Mariani J, et al. Hippocampal development and neural stem cell maintenance require Sox2-dependent regulation of Shh. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1248–1256. doi: 10.1038/nn.2397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jenkins D. Hedgehog signalling: emerging evidence for non-canonical pathways. Cell Signal. 2009;21:1023–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ruiz I, Altaba A. The works of GLI and the power of hedgehog. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:E147–148. doi: 10.1038/14099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mo R, Freer AM, Zinyk DL, Crackower MA, Michaud J, et al. Specific and redundant functions of Gli2 and Gli3 zinc finger genes in skeletal patterning and development. Development. 1997;124:113–123. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.1.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ruiz I, Altaba A. Combinatorial Gli gene function in floor plate and neuronal inductions by Sonic hedgehog. Development. 1998;125:2203–2212. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.12.2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee J, Platt KA, Censullo P, Ruiz I, Altaba A. Gli1 is a target of Sonic hedgehog that induces ventral neural tube development. Development. 1997;124:2537–2552. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.13.2537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aza-Blanc P, Lin HY, Ruiz I, Altaba A, Kornberg TB. Expression of the vertebrate Gli proteins in Drosophila reveals a distribution of activator and repressor activities. Development. 2000;127:4293–4301. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.19.4293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1501–1512. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.12.1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kenney AM, Widlund HR, Rowitch DH. Hedgehog and PI-3 kinase signaling converge on Nmyc1 to promote cell cycle progression in cerebellar neuronal precursors. Development. 2004;131:217–228. doi: 10.1242/dev.00891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kenney AM, Rowitch DH. Sonic hedgehog promotes G(1) cyclin expression and sustained cell cycle progression in mammalian neuronal precursors. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:9055–9067. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.23.9055-9067.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oliver TG, Grasfeder LL, Carroll AL, Kaiser C, Gillingham CL, et al. Transcriptional profiling of the Sonic hedgehog response: a critical role for N-myc in proliferation of neuronal precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:7331–7336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0832317100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sjostrom SK, Finn G, Hahn WC, Rowitch DH, Kenney AM. The Cdk1 complex plays a prime role in regulating N-myc phosphorylation and turnover in neural precursors. Dev Cell. 2005;9:327–338. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Echelard Y, Epstein DJ, St-Jacques B, Shen L, Mohler J, et al. Sonic hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity. Cell. 1993;75:1417–1430. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90627-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nery S, Wichterle H, Fishell G. Sonic hedgehog contributes to oligodendrocyte specification in the mammalian forebrain. Development. 2001;128:527–540. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.4.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Balordi F, Fishell G. Hedgehog signaling in the subventricular zone is required for both the maintenance of stem cells and the migration of newborn neurons. J Neurosci. 2007;27:5936–5947. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1040-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Traiffort E, Charytoniuk D, Watroba L, Faure H, Sales N, et al. Discrete localizations of hedgehog signalling components in the developing and adult rat nervous system. Eur J Neurosci. 1999;11:3199–3214. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00777.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Traiffort E, Charytoniuk DA, Faure H, Ruat M. Regional distribution of Sonic Hedgehog, patched, and smoothened mRNA in the adult rat brain. J Neurochem. 1998;70:1327–1330. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70031327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Machold R, Hayashi S, Rutlin M, Muzumdar MD, Nery S, et al. Sonic hedgehog is required for progenitor cell maintenance in telencephalic stem cell niches. Neuron. 2003;39:937–950. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00561-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Palma V, Ruiz i Altaba A. Hedgehog-GLI signaling regulates the behavior of cells with stem cell properties in the developing neocortex. Development. 2004;131:337–345. doi: 10.1242/dev.00930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bai CB, Stephen D, Joyner AL. All mouse ventral spinal cord patterning by hedgehog is Gli dependent and involves an activator function of Gli3. Dev Cell. 2004;6:103–115. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00394-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Park HL, Bai C, Platt KA, Matise MP, Beeghly A, et al. Mouse Gli1 mutants are viable but have defects in SHH signaling in combination with a Gli2 mutation. Development. 2000;127:1593–1605. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.8.1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Theil T, Alvarez-Bolado G, Walter A, Ruther U. Gli3 is required for Emx gene expression during dorsal telencephalon development. Development. 1999;126:3561–3571. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.16.3561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thibert C, Teillet MA, Lapointe F, Mazelin L, Le Douarin NM, et al. Inhibition of neuroepithelial patched-induced apoptosis by sonic hedgehog. Science. 2003;301:843–846. doi: 10.1126/science.1085405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li C, Chi S, He N, Zhang X, Guicherit O, et al. IFNalpha induces Fas expression and apoptosis in hedgehog pathway activated BCC cells through inhibiting Ras-Erk signaling. Oncogene. 2004;23:1608–1617. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Malatesta P, Hack MA, Hartfuss E, Kettenmann H, Klinkert W, et al. Neuronal or glial progeny: regional differences in radial glia fate. Neuron. 2003;37:751–764. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00116-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hockfield S, McKay RD. Identification of major cell classes in the developing mammalian nervous system. J Neurosci. 1985;5:3310–3328. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-12-03310.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lendahl U, Zimmerman LB, McKay RD. CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein. Cell. 1990;60:585–595. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90662-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Noctor SC, Martinez-Cerdeno V, Ivic L, Kriegstein AR. Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:136–144. doi: 10.1038/nn1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kriegstein AR, Noctor SC. Patterns of neuronal migration in the embryonic cortex. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:392–399. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Englund C, Fink A, Lau C, Pham D, Daza RA, et al. Pax6, Tbr2, and Tbr1 are expressed sequentially by radial glia, intermediate progenitor cells, and postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex. J Neurosci. 2005;25:247–251. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2899-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jensen JB, Parmar M. Strengths and limitations of the neurosphere culture system. Mol Neurobiol. 2006;34:153–161. doi: 10.1385/MN:34:3:153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ma BF, Liu XM, Xie XM, Zhang AX, Zhang JQ, et al. Slower cycling of nestin-positive cells in neurosphere culture. Neuroreport. 2006;17:377–381. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000204981.36995.db. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen JK, Taipale J, Cooper MK, Beachy PA. Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling by direct binding of cyclopamine to Smoothened. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2743–2748. doi: 10.1101/gad.1025302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Peli J, Schroter M, Rudaz C, Hahne M, Meyer C, et al. Oncogenic Ras inhibits Fas ligand-mediated apoptosis by downregulating the expression of Fas. EMBO J. 1999;18:1824–1831. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.7.1824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fenton RG, Hixon JA, Wright PW, Brooks AD, Sayers TJ. Inhibition of Fas (CD95) expression and Fas-mediated apoptosis by oncogenic Ras. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3391–3400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Xie J, Aszterbaum M, Zhang X, Bonifas JM, Zachary C, et al. A role of PDGFRalpha in basal cell carcinoma proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:9255–9259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151173398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Alvarez-Buylla A, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Tramontin AD. A unified hypothesis on the lineage of neural stem cells. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:287–293. doi: 10.1038/35067582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Traverse S, Gomez N, Paterson H, Marshall C, Cohen P. Sustained activation of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade may be required for differentiation of PC12 cells. Comparison of the effects of nerve growth factor and epidermal growth factor. Biochem J 288 (Pt. 1992;2):351–355. doi: 10.1042/bj2880351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Marshall CJ. Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell. 1995;80:179–185. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90401-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sun P, Watanabe H, Takano K, Yokoyama T, Fujisawa J, et al. Sustained activation of M-Ras induced by nerve growth factor is essential for neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells. Genes Cells. 2006;11:1097–1113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.01002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tabu K, Kimura T, Sasai K, Wang L, Bizen N, et al. Analysis of an alternative human CD133 promoter reveals the implication of Ras/ERK pathway in tumor stem-like hallmarks. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:39. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kazama H, Yonehara S. Oncogenic K-Ras and basic fibroblast growth factor prevent Fas-mediated apoptosis in fibroblasts through activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Cell Biol. 2000;148:557–566. doi: 10.1083/jcb.148.3.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.De Miranda J, Yaddanapudi K, Hornig M, Lipkin WI. Astrocytes recognize intracellular polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid via MDA-5. FASEB J. 2009;23:1064–1071. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-121434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kasperczyk H, Baumann B, Debatin KM, Fulda S. Characterization of sonic hedgehog as a novel NF-kappaB target gene that promotes NF-kappaB-mediated apoptosis resistance and tumor growth in vivo. FASEB J. 2009;23:21–33. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-111096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fuccillo M, Joyner AL, Fishell G. Morphogen to mitogen: the multiple roles of hedgehog signalling in vertebrate neural development. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:772–783. doi: 10.1038/nrn1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wallis D, Muenke M. Mutations in holoprosencephaly. Hum Mutat. 2000;16:99–108. doi: 10.1002/1098-1004(200008)16:2<99::AID-HUMU2>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ericson J, Muhr J, Jessell TM, Edlund T. Sonic hedgehog: a common signal for ventral patterning along the rostrocaudal axis of the neural tube. Int J Dev Biol. 1995;39:809–816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ruiz I, Altaba A, Sanchez P, Dahmane N. Gli and hedgehog in cancer: tumours, embryos and stem cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:361–372. doi: 10.1038/nrc796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Pasca di Magliano M, Hebrok M. Hedgehog signalling in cancer formation and maintenance. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:903–911. doi: 10.1038/nrc1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gotz M, Huttner WB. The cell biology of neurogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:777–788. doi: 10.1038/nrm1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.