In the above article [ Dong H, Dalton TP, Miller ML, Chen Y, Uno S, Shi Z, Shertzer HG, Bansal S, Avadhani NG, and Nebert DW (2009) Mol Pharmacol75:555–567], Fig. 1A is incorrect as originally drawn; presented here is the corrected version. The EcoRV and EagI sites that were erroneously shown as upstream of exon 1 are actually within intron 1. The EcoRV site is 44 base pairs (bp) downstream of exon 1, the distance between the EcoRV and EagI sites in intron 1 is 883 bp, and the EagI site is 1453 bp from the beginning of exon 2, in the 5′ direction. The distance from the EagI site in intron 1 to the EcoRV site beyond exon 7 is 7580 bp. In this corrected version, the lengths of the probe (792 bp; third line) and the NEO minicassette (1249 bp; second and third lines) are also drawn more proportionately to their actual sizes. The 34-bp loxP sites (arrowheads) and the exon-2 insertions (bold arrows pointing to hatched rectangles representing the organelle-specific variations) in the last three lines, and the primers (arrows) in the last line, are exaggerated in size so that they can be more easily seen.
The authors regret this error and apologize for any confusion or inconvenience it may have caused.