Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1984 Nov 12;12(21):8059–8072. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.21.8059

Possible structures of homopurine-homopyrimidine S1-hypersensitive sites.

C R Cantor, A Efstratiadis
PMCID: PMC320275  PMID: 6095187

Abstract

S1 nuclease hypersensitive sites in the 5' flanking regions of eukaryotic genes, present in small artificial supercoiled DNA circles, reside in homopurine-homopyrimidine stretches. The hierarchical behavior which these sites exhibit is consistent with the notion that they act as sinks of torsional free energy. By employing DMS as a single-strand-specific reagent, we show that these sites (despite their S1 sensitivity) are regions of duplex DNA. A simple thermodynamic treatment indicates that the high torsional stress in the small DNA circles is almost certain to be relieved by the formation of alternate DNA structures. The same treatment places some constraints on the types and sizes of the regions with alternate conformation. While no definitive structural conclusions can be drawn, left-handed helices seem most consistent with the extent and the pattern of sensitivity to S1 nuclease.

Full text

PDF
8059

Images in this article

8062Image
on p.8062
8066Image
on p.8066

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnott S., Bond P. J., Chandrasekaran R. Visualization of an unwound DNA duplex. Nature. 1980 Oct 9;287(5782):561–563. doi: 10.1038/287561a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnott S., Chandrasekaran R., Hall I. H., Puigjaner L. C. Heteronomous DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Jun 25;11(12):4141–4155. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.12.4141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnott S., Chandrasekaran R., Hall I. H., Puigjaner L. C., Walker J. K., Wang M. DNA secondary structures: helices, wrinkles, and junctions. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):53–65. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benham C. J. Stable cruciform formation at inverted repeat sequences in supercoiled DNA. Biopolymers. 1982 Mar;21(3):679–696. doi: 10.1002/bip.360210314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benham C. J. Statistical mechanical analysis of competing conformational transitions in superhelical DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):219–227. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benham C. J. Theoretical analysis of competitive conformational transitions in torsionally stressed DNA. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jul 25;150(1):43–68. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90324-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brahms S., Vergne J., Brahms J. G., Di Capua E., Bucher P., Koller T. DNA formed by reassociation of complementary single-stranded circles from natural DNA is shown to contain left- and right-handed double helices. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):119–124. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Courey A. J., Wang J. C. Cruciform formation in a negatively supercoiled DNA may be kinetically forbidden under physiological conditions. Cell. 1983 Jul;33(3):817–829. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Depew D. E., Wang J. C. Conformational fluctuations of DNA helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4275–4279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dodgson J. B., Wells R. D. Action of single-strand specific nucleases on model DNA heteroduplexes of defined size and sequence. Biochemistry. 1977 May 31;16(11):2374–2379. doi: 10.1021/bi00630a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Drew H. R., Travers A. A. DNA structural variations in the E. coli tyrT promoter. Cell. 1984 Jun;37(2):491–502. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90379-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Frank-Kamenetskii M. D., Vologodskii A. V. Thermodynamics of the B-Z transition in superhelical DNA. Nature. 1984 Feb 2;307(5950):481–482. doi: 10.1038/307481a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gupta G., Bansal M., Sasisekharan V. Conformational flexibility of DNA: polymorphism and handedness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6486–6490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haniford D. B., Pulleyblank D. E. Facile transition of poly[d(TG) x d(CA)] into a left-handed helix in physiological conditions. Nature. 1983 Apr 14;302(5909):632–634. doi: 10.1038/302632a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Horowitz D. S., Wang J. C. Torsional rigidity of DNA and length dependence of the free energy of DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1984 Feb 15;173(1):75–91. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90404-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kirkegaard K., Buc H., Spassky A., Wang J. C. Mapping of single-stranded regions in duplex DNA at the sequence level: single-strand-specific cytosine methylation in RNA polymerase-promoter complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 May;80(9):2544–2548. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.9.2544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kohwi-Shigematsu T., Gelinas R., Weintraub H. Detection of an altered DNA conformation at specific sites in chromatin and supercoiled DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(14):4389–4393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Larsen A., Weintraub H. An altered DNA conformation detected by S1 nuclease occurs at specific regions in active chick globin chromatin. Cell. 1982 Jun;29(2):609–622. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee J. S., Woodsworth M. L., Latimer L. J., Morgan A. R. Poly(pyrimidine) . poly(purine) synthetic DNAs containing 5-methylcytosine form stable triplexes at neutral pH. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Aug 24;12(16):6603–6614. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.16.6603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lilley D. M. Dynamic, sequence-dependent DNA structure as exemplified by cruciform extrusion from inverted repeats in negatively supercoiled DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):101–112. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):499–560. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mizuuchi K., Mizuuchi M., Gellert M. Cruciform structures in palindromic DNA are favored by DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):229–243. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90325-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nordheim A., Peck L. J., Lafer E. M., Stollar B. D., Wang J. C., Rich A. Supercoiling and left-handed Z-DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):93–100. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nordheim A., Rich A. The sequence (dC-dA)n X (dG-dT)n forms left-handed Z-DNA in negatively supercoiled plasmids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(7):1821–1825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.7.1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Panayotatos N., Wells R. D. Cruciform structures in supercoiled DNA. Nature. 1981 Feb 5;289(5797):466–470. doi: 10.1038/289466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peck L. J., Wang J. C. Energetics of B-to-Z transition in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(20):6206–6210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.20.6206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pulleyblank D. E., Shure M., Tang D., Vinograd J., Vosberg H. P. Action of nicking-closing enzyme on supercoiled and nonsupercoiled closed circular DNA: formation of a Boltzmann distribution of topological isomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4280–4284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sasisekharan V. Left-handed DNA duplexes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):45–52. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schon E., Evans T., Welsh J., Efstratiadis A. Conformation of promoter DNA: fine mapping of S1-hypersensitive sites. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(3 Pt 2):837–848. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90116-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shenk T. E., Rhodes C., Rigby P. W., Berg P. Biochemical method for mapping mutational alterations in DNA with S1 nuclease: the location of deletions and temperature-sensitive mutations in simian virus 40. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Mar;72(3):989–993. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.3.989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shore D., Baldwin R. L. Energetics of DNA twisting. II. Topoisomer analysis. J Mol Biol. 1983 Nov 15;170(4):983–1007. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Singleton C. K., Klysik J., Stirdivant S. M., Wells R. D. Left-handed Z-DNA is induced by supercoiling in physiological ionic conditions. Nature. 1982 Sep 23;299(5881):312–316. doi: 10.1038/299312a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stirdivant S. M., Kłysik J., Wells R. D. Energetic and structural inter-relationship between DNA supercoiling and the right- to left-handed Z helix transitions in recombinant plasmids. J Biol Chem. 1982 Sep 10;257(17):10159–10165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang J. C., Peck L. J., Becherer K. DNA supercoiling and its effects on DNA structure and function. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):85–91. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Weintraub H. A dominant role for DNA secondary structure in forming hypersensitive structures in chromatin. Cell. 1983 Apr;32(4):1191–1203. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90302-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES