Skip to main content
BMC Cancer logoLink to BMC Cancer
. 2011 Oct 6;11:429. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-429

A novel splice variant of the stem cell marker LGR5/GPR49 is correlated with the risk of tumor-related death in soft-tissue sarcoma patients

Swetlana Rot 1,#, Helge Taubert 2,4,5,#, Matthias Bache 1, Thomas Greither 3, Peter Würl 6, Alexander W Eckert 2, Johannes Schubert 2, Dirk Vordermark 1,#, Matthias Kappler 2,✉,#
PMCID: PMC3203099  PMID: 21978106

Abstract

Background

The human leucine-rich, repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor (LGR) 5, also called GPR49, is a marker of stem cells in adult intestinal epithelium, stomach and hair follicles. LGR5/GPR49 is overexpressed in tumors of the colon, ovary and liver and in basal cell carcinomas. Moreover, an expression in skeletal muscle tissues was also detected. However, there has been no investigation regarding the expression and function of LGR5/GPR49 in soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) yet.

Methods

Seventy-seven frozen tumor samples from adult STS patients were studied using quantitative real-time TaqMan™ PCR analysis. The mRNA levels of wild type LGR5/GPR49 and a newly identified splice variant of LGR5/GPR49 lacking exon 5 (that we called GPR49Δ5) were quantified.

Results

A low mRNA expression level of GPR49Δ5, but not wild type LGR5/GPR49, was significantly correlated with a poor prognosis for the disease-associated survival of STS patients (RR = 2.6; P = 0.026; multivariate Cox's regression hazard analysis). Furthermore, a low mRNA expression level of GPR49Δ5 was associated with a shorter recurrence-free survival (P = 0.043). However, tumor onset in patients with a lower expression level of GPR49Δ5 mRNA occurred 7.5 years later (P = 0.04) than in patients with a higher tumor level of GPR49Δ5 mRNA.

Conclusion

An attenuated mRNA level of the newly identified transcript variant GPR49Δ5 is a negative prognostic marker for disease-associated and recurrence-free survival in STS patients. Additionally, a lower GPR49Δ5 mRNA level is associated with a later age of tumor onset. A putative role of GPR49Δ5 expression in tumorigenesis and tumor progression of soft tissue sarcomas is suggested.

Background

Treatment options for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are often limited to surgery with the possibility of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The 5-year survival rate for STS patients is approximately 50% and depends strongly on the tumor stage [1]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new prognostic markers with the potential to estimate the efficacy of an individual therapeutic strategy.

STS are a heterogeneous group of relatively aggressive tumors probably originating from adult mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) [2-4]. A study regarding a subgroup of STS (malignant fibrous histiocytoma; MFH) described hMSCs as the progenitors of MFH. Furthermore, the authors reported a novel tumor suppression role for Wnt signaling in solid tumors, which may have the potential for a new therapeutic strategy in sarcomas [5].

Here, we investigated the prognostic impact of the stem cell marker, cancer-associated gene and Wnt/Tcf4 target gene LGR5/GPR49 [6] in STS for the first time.

The leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor LGR5/GPR49 has been identified as a novel stem cell marker in intestinal epithelia, stomach, and hair follicles [7-9]. Furthermore, LGR5/GPR49 mRNA was found to be expressed in normal human skeletal muscle tissues, which is of mesenchymal origin like STS [10].

LGR5/GPR49 mRNA is expressed in basal cell carcinoma (tumor of hair follicle), colorectal cancer and in tumors of the colon, ovary and liver [10-13]. Investigations of the LGR5/GPR49 protein expression are rare [14,15] because a full accepted antibody against LGR5/GPR49 is not available at the moment [6,16]. However, a prognostic impact of LGR5/GPR49 has not been shown so far.

The function of LGR5/GPR49 in tumorigenesis is supported by its ability to induce transformation of NIH3T3 cells in the presence of conditioned media from colorectal tumor cells. These findings indicate the possibility that the ligand of LGR5/GPR49 could be secreted by tumor cells [10]. McClanahan and colleagues therefore suggest a role for LGR5/GPR49 as a member of a novel class of transforming oncogenes and, as a result, a new potential molecular target for therapeutic intervention [10].

To our knowledge only one transcript variant of LGR5/GPR49, which lacks exon 8, is published in the ExPASy UniProtKB-data bank as variant VSP_037746 http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/O75473. In this study, we identified a novel transcript variant of LGR5/GPR49 that lacks exon 5 (GPR49Δ5) (listed by us in the EMBL-Bank; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/FN820440).

These variants are very interesting because both published LGR5/GPR49 variants have a truncated ligand binding extracellular domain [6,10]. It is possible that the affinity of these variants to the recently identified ligand of the full length LGR5/GPR49 gene product [17] is different or that different ligands could bind to the shortened receptor.

In summary, we report the first results for a newly identified variant of the LGR5/GPR49 gene, lacking exon 5, that we call GPR49Δ5. This is the first study that has demonstrated a prognostic impact of a LGR5/GPR49 variant in STS. In a multivariate Cox's regression analysis, we found that a low GPR49Δ5 mRNA level is an independent negative prognostic marker for disease-associated survival as well as for recurrence-free survival in STS patients.

Methods

Tissue samples and histopathological data

We examined frozen tumor samples from 77 STS patients using a real-time quantitative TaqMan™ analysis. The patients' median age was 59 years (ranging from 22 to 87 years). Forty-one patients (53%) died from their tumor after an average time of 28 months (ranging from 2-119 months), and 36 patients (47%) were still alive after an average observation period (i.e. after primary tumor resection) of 65 months (ranging from 11-146 months). The histopathological and clinical data has been summarized in Table 1 as described previously [18]. All tumor samples were collected before radio- or chemotherapy. After the tumor operation 27/77 patients were treated only with radiotherapy, two out of 77 patients were treated only with chemotherapy, and four patients were treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Table 1.

Histopathological and clinical data

Category Patients GPR49-mRNA level
in zmol/molecule HPRT
GPR49Δ5-mRNA level in zmol/molecule HPRT
≤1.07*10-5 > 1.07*10-5 ≤7.6*10-6 > 7.6*10-6
Total 77 39 38 39 38
P = 0.429 P = 0.212
Men 35 16 19 15 20
Women 42 23 19 24 18
Tumor stage P = 0.023* P = 0.005*
I 10 1 9 0 10
II 33 21 12 21 12
III 26 12 14 13 13
IV 8 5 3 5 3
Tumor type P = 0.194 P = 0.166
liposarcoma 19 6 13 5 14
fibrosarcoma/malignant fibrous histiocytoma 20 9 11 11 9
neurogenic sarcoma 6 3 3 3 3
rhabdomyosarcoma/leiomyosarcoma 22 15 7 14 8
Other STS 10 6 4 6 4
Tumor resection P = 0.377 P = 0.172
radical (R0) 51 24 27 23 28
not radical (R1) 26 15 11 16 10
Patients at follow-up
alive 36 15 21 13 23
dead 41 24 17 26 15
Localization P = 0.444 P = 0.207
extremities 49 25 24 26 23
thorax 6 2 4 1 5
head 1 0 1 0 1
abdomen 19 10 9 10 9
multiple 2 2 0 2 0
Metastasis P = 0.291 P = 0.025*
M0 21 9 12 7 14
M1 29 17 12 19 10
Age of tumor onset P = 0.218 P = 0.039*
age (mean) 59.9 55.4 61.4 53.9
Kaplan-Meier analysis P = 0.056 P = 0.004*
mean survival (months) 50.1 ± 6.5 80.3 ± 10.7 45.8 ± 6.4 86.2 ± 10.9
Univariate Cox's Regression P = 0.06 P = 0.006*
RR 1.8 2.5
CI 0.97-3.5 1.3-4.8
Multiv. Cox's-Regression P = 0.12 P = 0.026*
RR 1.8 2.6
CI 0.9-4.0 1.1-6.0

The study was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration, and it was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University Halle. All patients gave written informed consent (Department of Surgery 1, University of Leipzig, Germany).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Isolation of total RNA and cDNA synthesis were performed according to standard protocols as described previously [19]. The cDNA was amplified by automated real-time quantitative TaqMan™ assays for the wild type LGR5/GPR49 and GPR49Δ5 transcript variants and Hypoxanthin- guanine -phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) transcript using kits from Roboscreen (AJRoboscreen GmbH, Leipzig, Germany).

Wild type LGR5/GPR49 and GPR49Δ5 transcript amounts were correlated to HPRT transcript amounts as zeptomole (zmol, 10-21) wild type LGR5/GPR49 or GPR49Δ5 mRNAs per molecule HPRT mRNA in duplicate measurements.

An elevated expression of wild type LGR5/GPR49 was determined as an expression of > 1.07 × 10-5 zmol wild type LGR5/GPR49 mRNA/molecule HPRT mRNA and for GPR49Δ5 as an expression of > 7.6 × 10-6 zmol GPR49Δ5 mRNA/molecule HPRT mRNA.

Statistical analysis

Cox's regression hazard models and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate a correlation of wild type LGR5/GPR49 and GPR49Δ5 mRNA with disease-associated survival of STS patients. Cox's regression hazard model was adjusted to the prognostic effect of covariates (gender of patients, tumor stage, tumor entity, tumor localization, and type of tumor resection), and the relative risk (RR) was calculated. For analyzing the recurrence-free survival of STS patients, a Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. The follow-up time starts with the day of primary tumor operation. The end point for the disease-associated survival analysis was the time of death of the patient. The end point for the recurrence-free survival analysis was the first recurrence. The interrelationship between gene expression levels was tested with the Spearman's rank correlation (r, correlation coefficient). A probability (P) of < 0.05 was defined as significant. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA).

Results

Correlation of the mRNA expression level with survival of the STS patients

The median transcript ratios of 77 STS samples were 1.07 × 10-5 (ranging from 0-4.1 × 10-3; mean 2.3 × 10-4) zmol wild type LGR5/GPR49 mRNA and 7.6 × 10-6 (ranging from 0-6.4 × 10-3; mean 2.5 × 10-4) zmol GPR49Δ5 mRNA/molecule HPRT mRNA, respectively.

For the survival analysis, STS patients' data were separated according to the median expression levels. GPR49 low expression was defined as ≤1.07*10-5 GPR49 mRNA/molecule HPRT mRNA (39 patients) and high expression was defined as > 1.07*10-5 GPR49 mRNA/molecule HPRT (38 patients). For GPR49Δ5, low expression was defined as ≤7.6*10-6 GPR49Δ5 mRNA/molecule HPRT mRNA (39 patients and high expression was defined as > 7.6*10-6 GPR49Δ5 mRNA/molecule HPRT) (38 patients). The separation was based on the median expression level of the wild type LGR5/GPR49 mRNA and GPR49Δ5 mRNA (see also Table 1).

We performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis, which detected that STS patients with a lower intratumoral expression of wild type LGR5/GPR49 mRNA died an average of 30 months earlier (P = 0.056), with lower intratumoral GPR49Δ5 mRNA expression died an average of 40 months earlier (P = 0.004) than patients who had higher intratumoral expression of wild type LGR5/GPR49 mRNA and GPR49Δ5 mRNA, respectively (Table 1). Multivariate Cox's regression hazard analysis revealed an increased risk (RR = 1.8, P = 0.12, Table 1) of tumor-related death for patients with a low wild type LGR5/GPR49 mRNA level and a 2.6-fold (P = 0.026) increased risk for STS patients with a low level of GPR49Δ5 mRNA in their tumors, respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Multivariate Cox's hazard regression model for GPR49Δ5 mRNA expression level and disease-associated survival in STS patients. Expression level of GPR49Δ5 mRNA in STS of 77 patients was correlated with disease-associated survival. The model was adjusted to patients' gender, tumor stage, tumor localization, tumor entity, and the type of tumor resection. The high and low cut-off values for GPR49Δ5 were > 7.6 × 10-5 and ≤7.6 × 10-5 zmol GPR49Δ5 mRNA/molecule HPRT mRNA (RR = 2.6, P = 0.026).

Moreover, when we estimated recurrence-free survival, a low level of GPR49Δ5 mRNA expression was significantly associated with an early recurrence (P = 0.043; Figure 2), whereas low wild type LGR5/GPR49 mRNA expression levels had no significant effect (P = 0.20).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier analysis recurrence-free survival curves according to GPR49Δ5 transcript levels. Expression of GPR49Δ5 mRNA for 77 patients with STS was correlated with recurrence-free survival. The high and low cut-off values for GPR49Δ5 were > 7.6 × 10-5 and ≤7.6 × 10-5 zmol GPR49Δ5 mRNA/molecule HPRT mRNA (P = 0.043).

Furthermore, we found a significant difference in tumor onset (7.5 yrs) between STS patients with a low level compared to patients with a high level of GPR49Δ5 mRNA expression (61.4 vs. 53.9 yrs) in their tumors (P = 0.039; Student's t-test, Table 1; Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Correlation of GPR49Δ5 mRNA expression with age of tumor onset. There is a significant difference in the onset of the tumor (7.5 yrs) between STS patients with a low level (> 7.6 × 10-5 zmol GPR49Δ5 mRNA/molecule HPRT mRNA) (61.4 yrs) compared to patients with a high level (≤7.6 × 10-5 zmol GPR49Δ5 mRNA/molecule HPRT mRNA) of GPR49Δ5 tumor mRNA expression (53.9 yrs) (P = 0.039).

Correlation with clinical parameters

Bivariate analysis demonstrated that low expression of wild type LGR5/GPR49 mRNA correlated with higher tumor stage (P = 0.02). Low expression of GPR49Δ5 mRNA was also significantly associated with higher tumor stage (P = 0.005) and, moreover, with the occurrence of late distant metastases (P = 0.025) (Table 1). The mean intratumoral expression of GPR49Δ5 mRNA in the primary tumor was a 6fold lesser (6.9 × 10-5 vs. 4.3 × 10-4 zmol GPR49Δ5 mRNA/molecule HPRT mRNA) for those patients (n = 29) who developed metastases compared to patients (n = 21) without metastases.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that a low GPR49Δ5 mRNA level is a negative prognostic marker for disease-associated and recurrence-free survival in STS patients (Table 1).

LGR5/GPR49 labels stem cells in intestines, stomach and hair follicles [7-9]. When compared to corresponding normal tissues, LGR5/GPR49 mRNA is overexpressed in human hepatocellular carcinomas, basal cell carcinoma, colon-, colorectal- and ovarian tumors [10-13,20]. However, Yamamoto et al. found no significant association between expression of LGR5/GPR49 and clinicopathologic features of tumors [12]. We found that low mRNA expression of GPR49Δ5 has a prognostic impact for STS patients.

Why does low expression impact survival? We found that low expression of wild type LGR5/GPR49 mRNA (P = 0.023), as well as low expression of GPR49Δ5 mRNA (P = 0.005), was significantly associated with a higher tumor stage. STS patients with high-stage tumors have a poorer prognosis than those with low-stage tumors [21]. In accordance with our results, McClanahan and colleagues observed that in both colorectal and ovarian carcinomas expression of LGR5/GPR49 mRNA was high in stage I and II tumors and appears to decrease in stage III and IV tumors. The authors suggest that overexpression of LGR5/GPR49 may be an early event in tumorigenesis [10]. Furthermore, using a mouse endometrial cancer model, Sun et al. found that LGR5/GPR49 mRNA is highly expressed in the epithelium during the initial stages of tumorigenesis, but is remarkably down-regulated in full-grown tumors [22]. Fan et al. postulated a function for LGR5/GPR49 in the initiation of colorectal carcinomas [14]. This hypothesis corresponds with our finding that patients with lower-staged tumors had higher GPR49Δ5 mRNA levels, but earlier tumor onset.

However, low expression of GPR49Δ5 mRNA appears to be associated with tumor progression. Low expression of GPR49Δ5 mRNA is correlated with poor recurrence-free survival (P = 0.043) in STS patients and with the occurrence of late distant metastases (P = 0.025). Uchida et al. described diffuse LGR5/GPR49 mRNA expression in the entire tumor, as well as in the invasive front of human colorectal carcinomas [20]. LGR5/GPR49 mRNA expression in colorectal carcinomas correlated significantly with the number of lymph node metastases, lymphatic invasion, and vascular invasion [20]. Moreover, the expression of LGR5/GPR49 mRNA was significantly associated with poor prognosis for disease-free survival of colorectal cancer patients [11]. These data suggest, that LGR5/GPR49 mRNA expression may be associated with the malignant potential of colorectal cancer, including the appearance of metastasis [20].

Recently and in accordance to our results, Walker and colleagues described that an ablation of LGR5 induces increased invasion and anchorage-independent growth, and enhances tumourigenicity in xenografts experiments of human colorectal cancers. Suppression of LGR5/GPR49 leads to a strong upregulation of mesenchymal genes and of genes positively regulating EMT (Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition) - the same genes are markedly downregulated upon LGR5 overexpression [23]. These findings suggest that LGR5/GPR49 is important in restricting stem cells to their niche, and that loss of LGR5 concomitant with activated wnt signalling may contribute to the invasive phenotype of colorectal carcinomas. These results highlight the importance of LGR5, not simply as marker of colorectal tumor cells, but as a regulator of wnt responses, cell motility and cell-cell adhesion [23].

This fact can be of importance even for tumors of mesenchymal origin like STS.

Conclusion

In this study, we analyzed mRNA expression of an additional stem cell-associated gene, LGR5/GPR49 and its splice variant GPR49Δ5, for its association with disease-associated and recurrence-free survival. We were able to identify GPR49Δ5 mRNA expression as an independent prognostic factor for STS patients. We suggest that stem-cell-associated genes play a major role in sarcoma patients' prognosis and, therefore, could be valuable targets for future therapy. Together, our results suggest a role of GPR49Δ5 in tumorigenesis and tumor progression of STS.

List of abbreviations

GPR49: G protein-coupled receptor; MFH: malignant fibrous histiocytoma; hMSC: human mesenchymal stem cell; HPRT: hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase; LGR5: leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor; r: correlation coefficient (spearman test); RR: relative risk; STS: soft tissue sarcomas; Tcf4: T-cell transcription factor 4.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SR, HT, DV and MK designed the study, collected data, performed statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. PW treated the patients, collected material and data and reviewed the manuscript. MB and TG made substantial contributions to the acquisition and interpretation of data. AE and JS were involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/429/prepub

Contributor Information

Swetlana Rot, Email: swetlana.rot@medizin.uni-halle.de.

Helge Taubert, Email: Helge.Taubert@uk-erlangen.de.

Matthias Bache, Email: matthias.bache@medizin.uni-halle.de.

Thomas Greither, Email: thomas.greither@medizin.uni-halle.de.

Peter Würl, Email: peter.wuerl@diakoniewerk-halle.de.

Alexander W Eckert, Email: aw.eckert.wissenschaft@web.de.

Johannes Schubert, Email: johannes.schubert@medizin.uni-halle.de.

Dirk Vordermark, Email: dirk.vordermark@medizin.uni-halle.de.

Matthias Kappler, Email: matthias.kappler@medizin.uni-halle.de.

Acknowledgements

We thank our colleagues from the Department of Radiotherapy for contributing to this study and for their continuous support. S.R. and M.K. were supported by the Wilhelm-Roux-Programm of BMBF/NBL3 (FKZ: 16/18, 21/25). The work of H.T. was supported by grants of the Deutsche Krebshilfe No. 107590, the Wilhelm-Roux-Programm of BMBF/NBL3 (FKZ: 19/31) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK1591.

References

  1. Pollock RE, Karnell LH, Menck HR, Winchester DP. The National Cancer Data Base report on soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 1996;78:2247–2257. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961115)78:10&#x0003c;2247::AID-CNCR29&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck AH, West RB, van de RM. Gene expression profiling for the investigation of soft tissue sarcoma pathogenesis and the identification of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers. Virchows Arch. 2010;456:141–151. doi: 10.1007/s00428-009-0774-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tolar J, Nauta AJ, Osborn MJ, Panoskaltsis MA, McElmurry RT, Bell S, Xia L, Zhou N, Riddle M, Schroeder TM. et al. Sarcoma derived from cultured mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2007;25:371–379. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi J, Curtis SJ, Roy DM, Flesken-Nikitin A, Nikitin AY. Local Mesenchymal Stem/Progenitor Cells Are a Preferential Target for Initiation of Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas Associated with p53 and Rb Deficiency. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:2645–2658. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Matushansky I, Hernando E, Socci ND, Mills JE, Matos TA, Edgar MA, Singer S, Maki RG, Cordon-Cardo C. Derivation of sarcomas from mesenchymal stem cells via inactivation of the Wnt pathway. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:3248–3257. doi: 10.1172/JCI31377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barker N, Clevers H. Leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptors as markers of adult stem cells. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:1681–1696. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker N, Clevers H. Tracking down the stem cells of the intestine: strategies to identify adult stem cells. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1755–1760. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barker N, Huch M, Kujala P, van de WM, Snippert HJ, van Es JH, Sato T, Stange DE, Begthel H, van den BM. et al. Lgr5(+ve) stem cells drive self-renewal in the stomach and build long-lived gastric units in vitro. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jaks V, Barker N, Kasper M, van Es JH, Snippert HJ, Clevers H, Toftgard R. Lgr5 marks cycling, yet long-lived, hair follicle stem cells. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1291–1299. doi: 10.1038/ng.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McClanahan T, Koseoglu S, Smith K, Grein J, Gustafson E, Black S, Kirschmeier P, Samatar AA. Identification of overexpression of orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR49 in human colon and ovarian primary tumors. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006;5:419–426. doi: 10.4161/cbt.5.4.2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Takahashi H, Ishii H, Nishida N, Takemasa I, Mizushima T, Ikeda M, Yokobori T, Mimori K, Yamamoto H, Sekimoto M. et al. Significance of Lgr5(+ve) Cancer Stem Cells in the Colon and Rectum. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1166–1174. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1373-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yamamoto Y, Sakamoto M, Fujii G, Tsuiji H, Kenetaka K, Asaka M, Hirohashi S. Overexpression of orphan G-protein-coupled receptor, Gpr49, in human hepatocellular carcinomas with beta-catenin mutations. Hepatology. 2003;37:528–533. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tanese K, Fukuma M, Yamada T, Mori T, Yoshikawa T, Watanabe W, Ishiko A, Amagai M, Nishikawa T, Sakamoto M. G-protein-coupled receptor GPR49 is up-regulated in basal cell carcinoma and promotes cell proliferation and tumor formation. Am J Pathol. 2008;173:835–843. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.071091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fan XS, Wu HY, Yu HP, Zhou Q, Zhang YF, Huang Q. Expression of Lgr5 in human colorectal carcinogenesis and its potential correlation with beta-catenin. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25:583–590. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-0903-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Becker L, Huang Q, Mashimo H. Immunostaining of Lgr5, an intestinal stem cell marker, in normal and premalignant human gastrointestinal tissue. ScientificWorldJournal. 2008;8:1168–1176. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2008.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dekaney CM, Gulati AS, Garrison AP, Helmrath MA, Henning SJ. Regeneration of intestinal stem/progenitor cells following doxorubicin treatment of mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;297:G461–G470. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90446.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carmon KS, Gong X, Lin Q, Thomas A, Liu Q. R-spondins function as ligands of the orphan receptors LGR4 and LGR5 to regulate Wnt/{beta}-catenin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:11452–11457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106083108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kappler M, Kotzsch M, Bartel F, Fussel S, Lautenschlager C, Schmidt U, Wurl P, Bache M, Schmidt H, Taubert H. et al. Elevated expression level of survivin protein in soft-tissue sarcomas is a strong independent predictor of survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:1098–1104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taubert H, Bartel F, Greither T, Bache M, Kappler M, Kohler T, Bohnke A, Lautenschlager C, Schmidt H, Holzhausen HJ. et al. Association of HDM2 transcript levels with age of onset and prognosis in soft tissue sarcomas. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:1575–1581. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-2150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Uchida H, Yamazaki K, Fukuma M, Yamada T, Hayashida T, Hasegawa H, Kitajima M, Kitagawa Y, Sakamoto M. Overexpression of leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 in colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:1731–1737. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01571.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. Soft Tissue Tumors. 4 Aufl, St Louis Missouri, Mosby St Louis Missouri, Mosby. 2001.
  22. Sun X, Jackson L, Dey SK, Daikoku T. In pursuit of leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor-5 regulation and function in the uterus. Endocrinology. 2009;150:5065–5073. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Walker F, Zhang HH, Odorizzi A, Burgess AW. LGR5 Is a Negative Regulator of Tumourigenicity, Antagonizes Wnt Signalling and Regulates Cell Adhesion in Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines. PLoS One. 2011. in press . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES