Skip to main content
NCBI home page
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2011 Oct 27;6(10):e26853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026853

Distinct Origin of the Y and St Genome in Elymus Species: Evidence from the Analysis of a Large Sample of St Genome Species Using Two Nuclear Genes

Chi Yan 1,2, Genlou Sun 1,2,*, Dongfa Sun 1,*
Editor: Simon Joly3
PMCID: PMC3203181  PMID: 22046383

Abstract

Background

Previous cytological and single copy nuclear genes data suggested the St and Y genome in the StY-genomic Elymus species originated from different donors: the St from a diploid species in Pseudoroegneria and the Y from an unknown diploid species, which are now extinct or undiscovered. However, ITS data suggested that the Y and St genome shared the same progenitor although rather few St genome species were studied. In a recent analysis of many samples of St genome species Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) À. Löve suggested that one accession of P. spicata species was the most likely donor of the Y genome. The present study tested whether intraspecific variation during sampling could affect the outcome of analyses to determining the origin of Y genome in allotetraploid StY species. We also explored the evolutionary dynamics of these species.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Two single copy nuclear genes, the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RPB2) and the translation elongation factor G (EF-G) sequences from 58 accessions of Pseudoroegneria and Elymus species, together with those from Hordeum (H), Agropyron (P), Australopyrum (W), Lophopyrum (Ee), Thinopyrum (Ea), Thinopyrum (Eb), and Dasypyrum (V) were analyzed using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. Sequence comparisons among all these genomes revealed that the St and Y genomes are relatively dissimilar. Extensive sequence variations have been detected not only between the sequences from St and Y genome, but also among the sequences from diploid St genome species. Phylogenetic analyses separated the Y sequences from the St sequences.

Conclusions/Significance

Our results confirmed that St and Y genome in Elymus species have originated from different donors, and demonstrated that intraspecific variation does not affect the identification of genome origin in polyploids. Moreover, sequence data showed evidence to support the suggestion of the genome convergent evolution in allopolyploid StY genome species.

Introduction

Hybridization and polyploidization have played an important role in the history of plant evolution, and contribute greatly to speciation [1]. Previous studies have reported that hybridization and chromosome doubling would create genetic shocks and the newly formed allopolyploids would need to undergo major intra- and inter-genomic changes. Many of these genome-wide alterations in allopolyploids could arise from rapid loss and recombination of low-copy DNA, retrotransposon activation, DNA methylation pattern changes and epigenetic gene silencing during or following polyploidization [2]–[4]. These rapid genomic changes may lead to genetic asymmetry evolution resulting in conformity and convergent effects caused by the inter-genome invasion of chromatin segments in either only one pair of chromosomes (chromosome-specific sequences) or in several chromosome pairs of one genome (genome-specific sequences) in the alloploids [5]–[10]. These changes may result in full fertility and stabilization of the hybrid condition and assist in establishing the phenotype in nature [11]. However, a clear and appropriate identification of phylogenetic relationships among taxa and genes, as well as genomic elements is needed.

The tribe Triticeae contains the world's most economically important grasses such as wheat, barley, and forage crops. The tribe combines a wide variety of biological mechanisms and genetic systems which make it an excellent group for research in evolution, and speciation [12]. Elymus, the largest genus in grass tribe Triticeae, includes approximately 150 species that are widely distributed all over the world. Moreover, Elymus is an exclusively allopolyploid genus but closely related to other genera in the Triticeae. Cytological analyses have identified five basic genomes (St, H, Y, P, and W) in this genus. It is believed that the St genome, found in all Elymus species, was donated by Pseudoroegneria (Nevski) Á. Löve, while the H, P, and W genomes are derived from Hordeum L., Agropyron Gaertn., and Australopyrum (Tzvelev) Á. Löve, respectively [13]–[16]. Elymus is an ideal genus for a genome duplication dynamic study because of the abundance of polyploid species and the close relationship to diploid taxa in the Triticeae,

Recently, one of the controversial debates about the Elymus genus is the origin of the Y genome. Previous studies have examined molecular evolution and phylogeny of some Elymus species [17]–[22], but it is still unclear where the Y genome originates from, although it is a common genome in Central and East Asia [14], [15], [23]. ITS sequence data suggest that Y and St may share the same progenitor genome [17], [18]. However, single copy of nuclear gene data of Mason-Gamer et al. [19], [20] and Sun et al. [21], [22] reject the idea that the St and Y genomes have the same origin. Instead, the results support Dewey's hypothesis that the Y genome had an independent origin from a Y diploid species that is now extinct or undiscovered. Okito et al. [24] employed a random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) based sequence tagged site (STS) as a marker to investigate the origin of the Y genome using a relatively large number of P. spicata samples (St genome). The data showed that one accession of P. spicata (PI 232134) may be the donor of the Y genome and a prime candidate for the origin of the Y genome in E. longearistatus (StY). This conclusion is also consistent with the ITS data [18].

Phylogenetic analysis is routinely applied to test evolutionary questions, and tracing the origin of polyploidy based on interspecific data. This analysis generally assumes that intraspecifc variation is smaller than interspecific variation, and that within and between species, sample sizes are sufficiently large to capture variation at both levels [25]. Systematists deal with intraspecific variation in many different ways. For sequence analysis, they sample a single individual per species or treat each individual or haplotype as a separate terminal taxon [26]. This delineates the potential risk of bias. Whether the controversy on the origin of the Y genome in the StY Elymus species was caused by intraspecific variation during sampling or not still remains to be examined.

In the present study, we analyzed 16 accessions of St genome species P. spicata, 27 accessions of 14 other diploid species, and 15 allotetraploids representing the StY genome using two single copy nuclear genes: the translation elongation factor G (EF-G) and the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RPB2). The objectives of this study are: (1) to confirm or reject whether St and Y share a common progenitor genome; (2) to explore whether intraspecific variation during the sampling would affect the result on the origin of Y genome in allotetraploid StY species; (3) to investigate RPB2 and EF-G evolution in allopolyploid species and their potential donor species.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and DNA extraction

Twenty-five accessions of 8 diploid species representing the St and other genomes were sequenced. The seeds were provided by USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). Germinated seeds were transplanted to a sand-peat mixture, and the plants maintained in a greenhouse. DNA was extracted from fresh young leaf tissues using the method of Junghans and Metzlaff [27]. RPB2 and EF-G sequences for 15 polyploid Triticeae species representing the StY genome together with 17 accessions representing the St, H, W, P, E and V genomes, along with Bromus sterilis were obtained from published data [21], [22], and included in phylogenetic analyses. Plant material with accession numbers, genomic constitutions, geographical origins, and GenBank identification numbers are presented in Table S1. The species identity has confirmed for the accessions which we successfully obtained mature plants. The specimen were kept at Biology Department of Biology, Saint Mary's University.

DNA amplification and sequencing

The single-copy nuclear genes RPB2 and EF-G were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers P6F and P6FR [28], cMWG699T3-2 and cMWG699T7-2 [29], respectively. The amplification profile for the RPB2 gene is as follows: an initial denaturation at 95°C for 4 min and 35–40 cycles of 95°C for 40 sec, 51°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 90 sec. The cycling ended with 72°C for 10 min. PCR profile for amplifying EF-G gene was based on Komatsuda et al. [29] except annealing temperature of 49°C. PCR products were purified using the QIAquickTM PCR purification kit (QIAGEN Inc.) according to manufacturer instructions.

PCR products were commercially sequenced by MACROGEN (Seoul, Korea). To enhance the sequence quality, both forward and reverse strands were sequenced independently. To avoid any error which would be induced by Taq DNA polymerase during PCR amplification, each sample was independently amplified twice and sequenced. Taq errors that cause substitutions are mainly random, and it is hence unlikely that the results of two sequences would share identical Taq errors to create a false synapomorphy.

Data analysis

Automated sequence results were compared visually with chromatographs. Multiple sequence alignments were made using ClustalX with default parameters and additional manual edits to minimize gaps [30]. Phylogenetic analysis using the maximum-parsimony (MP) method was performed with the computer program PAUP* ver. 4 beta 10 [31]. All characters were specified as unweighted and unordered, and gaps were excluded in the analyses. Most-parsimonious trees were obtained by performing a heuristic search using the Tree Bisection-Reconnection (TBR) option with MulTrees selected, and ten replications of random addition sequences with the stepwise addition option. Multiple parsimonious trees were combined to form a strict consensus tree. Overall character congruence was estimated by the consistency index (CI), and the retention index (RI). In order to infer the robustness of clades, bootstrap values with 1000 replications [32] were calculated by performing a heuristic search using the TBR option with MulTrees on.

In addition to maximum parsimony analysis, maximum-likelihood (ML) and Bayesian analyses were performed. For ML analysis, 8 nested models of sequence evolution were tested for both the RPB2 and EF-G data set using PhyML 3.0 [33]. For each data set, the general time-reversible (GTR) [34] substitution model led to a largest ML score compared to the other 7 substitution models: JC69 [35], K80 [36], F81 [37], F84 [38], HKY85 [39], TN93 [40] and custom (data not shown). As the result, the GTR model was used in the Bayesian analysis using MrBayes 3.1 [41]. Default uniform priors were used for all model parameters (six substitution rates, four base frequencies, proportion of invariable sites, and alpha value of gamma distribution). One cold and three incrementally heated Markov Chains Monte Carlo (mcmc) chains were run simultaneously, each for both the two sequences data with default heating value (0.2). In order to make the standard deviation of split frequencies fall below 0.01 so that the occurrence of convergence could be certain, 4,750,000 generations for RPB2 data and 600,000 generations for EF-G were ran. Samples were taken every 1000 generations under the GTR model with gamma-distributed rate variation across sites and a proportion of invariable sites. For all analyses, the first 25% of samples from each run were discarded as burn in to ensure the stationarity of the chains. Bayesian posterior probability (PP) values were obtained from a majority rule consensus tree generated from the remaining sampled trees.

Results

Sequence variation

The amplified patterns from each diploid species show a single band for both the RPB2 and EF-G sequences with a size of approximately 800∼1000 bp, which corresponds well to previous findings [21], [22]. Not only have extensive sequence variations been detected in the present study between the sequences from the St and Y genomes, but also among the sequences from the diploid St genome species. Notably, sequence alignment shows a large insertion/deletion (indel) in the RPB2 data (Fig. 1) which occurred at position 10. Some sequences were downloaded from Genbank and shorter than the others, so they were excluded for the comparison of this indel. In order to compare insertion/deletion among different species, we placed the data into three groups (boxes) (Fig. 1). The sequences in group I were deficient for all diploid St genome sequences and two sequences from the W genome (PI 533014 and PI 547363) together with one sequence from the H genome (PI 499645), compared to the St and Y sequences from allotetraploid StY species and all the sequences from P, Eb, Ee and V genomes. Group II included all sequences from diploid St species except the three P. libanotica accessions (PI 330687, PI 330688 and PI401274) and one P. spicata accession (PI 610986) had 31 bp deletions, while the sequences from St and Y genomes in tetraploid Elymus species, and the sequences from the H, W (except PI 531553), P, Eb, Ee, and V genome species did not have this deletion. Group III comprised samples with a 6 bp insertion that occurred in the Y, H, W (except PI 531553), P, and E genome sequences. None of the St genome contained the sequence GAATGT in this region.

Figure 1. Partial alignment of amplified RPB2 sequences from Elymus StY and their putative diploid donor species.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Three uninterrupted indels showed in different boxes. (I): A 16 bp insertion were deleted in all diploid St genome sequences, two sequences from W genome (PI 533014 and PI 547363) and one sequence from H genome (PI 499645), compared to the St and Y sequences from allotetraploid StY species and all the sequences from P, Eb, Ee and V genome. (II): All sequences from diploid St species, except three P. libanotica accessions (PI 330687, PI 330688 and PI401274) and one P. spicata accession (PI 610986), have the 31 bp deletion compared to the sequences from H, W (except PI 531553), P, Eb, Ee, V and StY genome species. (III): A 6 bp insertion occurred in the Y, H, W (except PI 531553), P, and E genome sequences. None of the St genome contained the sequence (GAATGT) in this region.

Phylogenetic analyses of RPB2 sequences

Maximum parsimony analysis was conducted using Bromus sterilis as the outgroup. The parsimony analysis resulted in 826 equally most parsimonious trees (CI excluding uninformative characters  = 0.650; RI  = 0.836). The separated Bayesian analyses using GTR model resulted in identical trees with mean log-likelihood values −5318.82 and −5490.62 (data not shown). The tree topologies were almost identical in both ML and Bayesian likelihood trees and similar to those generated by MP, but only one of the most parsimonious trees with Bayesian PP and maximum parsimony bootstrap (1000 replicates) value is shown (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. One of the 826 parsimonious trees derived from RPB2 sequence data.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The tree was conducted using heuristic search with TBR branch swapping. Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) values, respectively. Heavy internal branches are retained in the strict consensus tree. Bromus sterilis was used as an outgroup. Consistency index (CI)  = 0.650, retention index (RI)  = 0.836, rescale consistency index (RCI)  = 0.543.

Phylogenetic analyses separated the sequences into three clades. All diploid species from the St genome and one sequence of D. villosum representing the V genome were grouped together in 67% BS (PP  = 0.95). Included in the clade are the St genome sequences from tetraploid Elymus species (Fig. 2), while the Y copy sequences from tetraploid StY Elymus species formed a clade with the W and P genome species in 71% BS (PP  = 1.00). The two copies of sequences from each Elymus species except E. pendulinus (H8986) and E. longearistatus (PI 401280) were separated well into two different clades, while the sequence from E. pendulinus (H8986) and E. longearistatus (PI 401280) was related to the presumed Y+W+P genome clade. The only difference among the MP, ML and BI trees is the Y copy sequence of E. semicostatus (PI 207452) which separated from the subclade with two other Y copy from accessions PI 639828 and PI 499476 in the ML tree. These three sequences were grouped together and were fairly well supported by the BI and MP trees (63% BS, PP  = 0.99).

Within the St (Pseudoroegneria + Elymus) clade, all P. spicata accessions except PI 610986 and PI 506274 formed a well supported subclade (92% BS, PP  = 0.96), within which P. strigosa and P. gracillima were nested. The P. spicata sequences from accession PI 610986 and PI 506274, along with the St copy from StY tetraploid species were placed outside this subclade. The sequences from P. tauri, P. libanotica and E. caucasicus were grouped into a separate subclade.

Phylogenetic analyses of the EF-G sequences

The parsimony analysis resulted in 556 most parsimonious trees (CI excluding uninformative characters  = 0.863; RI  = 0.906). The Bayesian analyses using GTR model resulted in identical trees with mean log-likelihood values of −4132.80 and −4508.50 (data not shown). The tree topologies generated by ML, MP and Bayesian analyses were similar to each other, but only one of the most parsimonious trees with BS and PP values is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. One of the 556 parsimonious trees derived from EF-G sequence data.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The tree was conducted using heuristic search with TBR branch swapping. Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) values, respectively. Heavy internal branches are retained in the strict consensus tree. Bromus sterilis was used as an outgroup. Consistency index (CI)  = 0.863, retention index (RI)  = 0.906, rescale consistency index (RCI)  = 0.783.

In contrast to the RPB2 sequences, Maximum Parsimony and Bayesian analyses based on EF-G sequences clearly separated the sequences from the St genome species into two distinct clades (Fig. 3). The first contained P. tauri and P. libanotica, as well as E. longearistatus and E. caucasicus with 96% BS support (PP  = 1.00) and the secont included P. spicata, P. gracillima, P. stipifolia, P. ferganensis, P. strigosa and Elymus species. However, the ML tree based on EF-G sequences still combined these two subclades into one large clade. The P. spicata accession PI 232134 that was suggested as the Y genome donor to E. longearistatus [24] was sister to the subclade (83% BS) of the other two P. spicata accessions (PI 537389 and PI 610986), and included in this Pseudoroegneria + Elymus clade.

All but one of the Y containing taxa with the E and W genomes formed a well supported clade (BS  = 99%, PP  = 1.00). The Y genome clade was further divided into two subclades. The first contained E. semicostatus, E. strictus, E. abolinii, E. antiquus, E. pendulinus, and E. gmelinii with 100% bootstrap support (PP  = 1.0). The second group comprised of E. longearistatus and E. caucasicus with 100% bootstrap support (PP  = 1.0). The Y copy sequence from E. fedtschenkoi (PI 564927) was not grouped into the Y genome clade and instead appeared as a sister to the H genome sequences.

Discussion

Possible origin of the Y genome and the relationships among the St and Y genome with other genomes in Elymus species

The phylogenetic analyses of Elymus and as many as 31 accessions from 8 St genome diploid species, in the present study, provide support for the distinct origin of the Y genome in polyploid StY species. Both RPB2 and EF-G phylogenetic trees have well separated the Y genome from the St genome. These results are in accordance with the previous findings by Mason-Gamer et al. [19], [20] and Sun et al. [21], and support Dewey's hypothesis that there is a Y diploid species from which the Y genome originated. The data do not support the idea that the St and Y genomes have the same origin, which was based on ITS data by Liu et al. [18]. Recently, Okito et al. [24] suggested that one accession of P. spicata (PI 232134) might be the donor of the Y genome and a prime candidate for the origin of the Y genome to E. longearistatus (StY). In our study, the accession of P. spicata (PI 232134) was included but both RPB2 and EF-G phylogenetic trees placed this accession in the St genome together with other Pseudoroegneria species. This indicates that there is not a close link between St genome in P. spicata and the Y genome in E. longearistatus or other StY genome species. Since the Y genome grouped with the W genome sequences in both the RPB2 and EF-G trees, it implies that the W genome is closely related to the Y genome.

With respect to the relationships among different diploid species with the St genome, both the RPB2 and EF-G data separated the P. libanotica + P. tauri group from other St genome species. The separation of P. libanotica from P. spicata was expected since previous AFLF analysis indicated a great difference between P. libanotica and P. spicata [42]. An interesting result in the RPB2 tree was that the presumed St genome copy of E. longearistatus (StY) placed close to the Y genome clade with a 69% BS, rather than being grouped with other St-genome sequences from tetraploid StY species. Furthermore, in the EF-G tree, the presumed St-genome copy of E. longearistatus (StY) proved to be different from other larger St-gonome clade sequences and formed another well-supported clade (96% BS) with two P. libanotica individuals and P. tauri. This discrepancy within the sequence data between the St copy of E. longearistatus and the St genome clade sequences may be the reason why Okito et al. [24] suggested that one accession of P. spicata (PI 232134) could be the candidate donor of the Y genome to E. longearistatus (StY). However, since the sequences in the St genome of E. longearistatus are quite different from the other St genome sequences. In both the trees of RPB2 and EF-G sequences, P. libanotica grouped with the St copy of E. caucasicus (PI 531573) and separated from other diploid St genome species. These data indicate that P. libanotica may be the donor of the St genome in allotetraploid E. caucasicus species.

Dense sampling of intraspecies accession does not affect the identification of genome origin in polyploids

Intraspecific variation is abundant in all types of systematic characters which could cause bias in the phylogenetic analyses [43]. Systematists use different ways to deal with intraspecific variation [26]. There has been considerable debate as to which of the methods for directly analyzing polymorphic data is superior (e.g., [44]–[46]). One simulation study found that, overall, the most accurate methods were likelihood, the additive distance methods, and the frequency of parsimony method [26]. Okito et al. [24] used relatively large samples from P. spicata (St genome) to investigate the origin of the Y genome, and suggested that one accession of P. spicata (PI 232134) may be the donor of the Y genome, which conflicts the previous findings of Mason-Gamer et al. [19], [20], Sun et al. [21] and Sun and Komatsuda [22] who used a few samples from the St genomes species. In most previous phylogenetic studies, only one or two accessions have been used to represent entire species data, however, this neglects the change of intraspecific variation, and may result in a biased conclusion. This is the first time we used as many as 31 accessions from 8 St genome species in the phylogenetic analysis to evaluate if intraspecific variation could affect the phylogenetic result of the Y genome origin. MP, ML and Bayesian analyses reached the same conclusion that the St and Y genomes have distinct origins. Although fairly intraspecific variation has been detected in P. spicata [42] and other diploid species (data not shown), they do not influence the identification of the Y genome origin. It has been shown in previous studies that effective taxon sampling would be beneficial when analyzing the relationships across various levels of biological organization (e.g., genes, genomes, individuals, populations, species, or clades) due to poor taxon sampling leading to an increase in the apparent rate of variation which results in the overrepresentation of older nodes in the phylogenetic trees, and therefore, the bias caused by incomplete species sampling must be considered when using phylogenies to test hypotheses about species diversity (e.g., [47]–[51]). However, since the genome-wide recombination would have a much greater variation than the ones of intraspecies accessions, the sample size of each species would not affect our investigation of the inter-genome questions, such as genome origination, if the minimal requirement (two or more representative accessions per species) is reached.

Genome evolution in allopolyploid species

The process of polyploidy occurs in cells and organisms when there are more than two paired (homologous) sets of chromosomes. During or after the process of allopolyploidization, rapid sequence elimination and restructuring of low-copy DNA, cytosine methylation, as well as the changes of transposable element activation and epigenetic gene silencing in allopolyploids shape the genomes in plants [2]–[4]. In this study, extensive nucleotide changes and genome-wide indels have been found between the sequences of the diploid St species and the allopolyploid StY species. The present study shows a 47 bp insertions in all the St copies of the RPB2 sequences from allotetraploid StY species and all the diploid St species lack this insertion(Fig. 1 Part I and II) except the three P. libanotica accessions (PI 330687, PI 330688 and PI401274) and one P. spicata accession (PI 610986). One possible scenario is that the St genome in tetraploid StY species was donated by these four accessions. However, the geographical distribution of P. spicata does not overlap with StY Elymus species, and phylogenetic analyses did not provide convincing evidence of that the accession PI 610986 of P. spicata and P. libanotica are the St donor species to all allotetraploid StY species analyzed here (Figs. 2 and 3).

Another possible scenario is that the St genome in Elymus species acquired this part of the sequence by the inter-genome invasion of chromatin segments from the Y genome to the St genome and abundant genome-wide recombination following the fusion of St and Y gametes, before or after the process of polyploidization. It is also possible that the noted indels are homopasious, however, since the RPB2 gene data from other genomic diploid species contain the same insertion as well, we could not rule out the possibility that this is due to the gene introgression between the St genome and other diploid species from the W, H or E genomes. Furthermore, this theory of gene introgression wouldn't work for the following reasons. The RPB2 sequence data indicated that the tetraploid species E. pendulinus (H8986) and E. longearistatus (PI 401280) representing StY genome exhibited a high similarity between the two copies from St and Y genomes. As the result, the St copies of E. pendulinus (H8986) and E. longearistatus (PI 401280) are sister with the presumed Y-genome clade (69% BS) in the MP, ML and Bayesian trees. It could be that the St and Y genome have a common origin, however, the majority of 13 other tetraploid StY species sequences contain distinct St and Y genomes. Hence, the similarities between the RPB2 sequences in the St and Y genome in E. pendulinus (H8986) and E. longearistatus (PI 401280) could not be explained by the same origin of the St and Y genomes. Also, only one copy of EF-G sequence from E. pendulinus (H8986) was found even though more than ten clones were screened. Assuming no bias in cloning or PCR amplification, this gives a 99.9% chance of obtaining at least one copy of each of the two ancestral allelic types for the allotetraploid [52]. Gene introgression between the St and Y genome species and other diploid species could not explain this. Genome-wide recombination between the St and Y genomes could result in the two genome sequences at this location being identical to the extent that we could not distinguish one from the other in this specific DNA fragment. Therefore, the explanation of genetic asymmetry evolution between the two parental genomes following polyploidization seems to be more likely than gene introgression.

Previous research has shown genome-wide recombination of allopolyploid between two constituent genomes in wheat species T. turgidum subsp. dicoccoides (Koern.) Thell., indicating that allopolyploid organisms can “select” the most efficient gene combination from one genome to control a set of related traits [11]. Comparative chromosomal studies using genetic mapping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have demonstrated that inter-genome invasion of chromatin segments can occur from the B genome into the A genome (e.g., [53]). In the multiple independent synthetic lines of Brassica napus allotetraploids, genetic asymmetry evolution has been reported by Gaeta et al. [54], who found that convergent evolution of the two parental genomes could reflect extensive genomic combination. In contrast to the multiple copy genes, such as ITS, single-copy genes may more easily suffer from the loci loss due to random events after polyploidization [55]. Our finding using StY genome species support these ideas for the genome convergent evolution in allopolyploids.. Based on the two nuclear gene sequence data, we still could not determine the exact origin and the clear location of the Y genome in the tribe Triticeae Since sequence variability has been found in E. pendulinus and E. longearistatus more research is needed, to reveal the phylogenetic relationships and genome convergence in these species. Clearly, there are still a number of aspects which requires further study.

Supporting Information

Table S1

Taxa from Bromus, Elymus, Hordeum, Pseudoroegneria, Lophopyrum, Thinopyrum, Agropyron, Australopyrum and Dasypyrum used in this study.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (89KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

We thank Jonathon Forest and Qianni Hu for valuable discussions on the manuscript and Professor D.H.S Richardson, Dean Emeritus, Saint Mary's University for revisions and helpful comments on an early draft of this manuscript.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This research was supported by a discovery grant (238425) from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canadian Foundation for Innovation, and a Senate Research Grant at Saint Mary's University to GS, and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System to DS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH, Lindsay BG, Soltis DE, et al. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Research. 2006;16:738–749. doi: 10.1101/gr.4825606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen ZJ, Pikaard CS. Transcriptional analysis of nucleolar dominance in polyploid plants: biased expression/silencing of progenitor rRNA genes is developmentally regulated in Brassica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:3442–3447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Comai L, Tyaqi AP, Winter K, Holmes-Davis R, Reynolds SH. Phenotypic instability and rapid gene silencing in newly formed Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Plant Cell. 2000;12:1551–1567. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee HS, Chen ZJ. Protein-coding genes are epigenetically regulated in Arabidopsis polyploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:6753–6758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121064698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ozkan H, Levy AA, Feldman M. Allopolyploidy induced rapid genome evolution in the wheat (Aegilops-Triticum) group. Plant Cell. 2001;13:1735–1747. doi: 10.1105/TPC.010082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ozkan H, Levy AA, Feldman M. Rapid differentiation of homoeologous chromosomes in newly formed allopolyploid wheat. Isr J Plant Sci. 2002;50:65–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shaked H, Kashkush K, Ozkan H, Feldman M, Levy AA. Sequence elimination and cytosine methylation are rapid and reproducible responses of the genome to wide hybridization and allopolyploidy in wheat. Plant Cell. 2001;13:1749–1759. doi: 10.1105/TPC.010083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Salina EA, Numerova OM, Ozkan H, Feldman M. Alterations in subtelomeric tandem repeats during early stages of allopolyploidy in wheat. Genome. 2004;47:860–867. doi: 10.1139/g04-044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Han FP, Fedak G, Quellet T, Liu B. Rapid genomic exchanges in interspecific and intergeneric hybrids and allopolyploids of Triticeae. Genome. 2003;46:716–723. doi: 10.1139/g03-049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Han FP, Fedak G, Guo WL, Liu B. Rapid and repeatable elimination of a parental genome-specific DNA repeat (pGc1R-1a) in newly synthesized wheat allopolyploids. Genetics. 2005;170:1239–1245. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.039263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Feldman M, Levy AA. Genome evolution in allopolyploid wheat–a revolutionary reprogramming followed by gradual changes. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36:511–518. doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60142-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bothmer Rvon, Salomon B. Triticeae: a tribe for food, feed and fun. In: Wang RRC, Jensen KB, Jaussi C, editors. Proceedings of the 2nd international Triticeae symposium. Utah: Logan Press; 1994. pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dewey DR. The genomic system of classification. A guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennial Triticeae. In: Gustafson JP, editor. Gene manipulation in Plant Improvement. New York: Plenum Press; 1984. pp. 209–280. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jensen KB. Cytology, fertility, and morphology of Elymus kengii (Keng) Tzvelev and E. grandiglumis (Keng) Á. Löve (Triticeae: Poaceae). Genome. 1990;33:563–570. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Torabinejad J, Mueller RJ. Genome Constitution of the Australian hexaploid grass Elymus scabrus (Poaceae: Triticeae). Genome. 1993;36:147–151. doi: 10.1139/g93-018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jensen KB, Salomon B. Cytogenetics and morphology of Elymus panormitanus var. heterophyllus (Keng) Á. Löve and its relationship to Elymus panormitanus (Poaceae: Triticeae). Int J Plant Sci. 1995;156:731–739. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lu BR, Liu Q. The possible origin of the “StY” genome Elymus: a new mechanism of allopolyploidy in plants. Czech J Genet Plant Breed. 2005;41:58. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu Q, Ge S, Tang H, Zhang X, Zhu G, et al. Phylogenetic relationships in Elymus (poaceae: Triticeae) based on the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer and chloroplast trnL-F sequences. New Phytol. 2006;170:411–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01665.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mason-Gamer RJ, Burns MM, Naum M. Polyploidy, introgression, and complex phylogenetic patterns within Elymus. Czech J Genet Plant Breed. 2005;41:21–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mason-Gamer RJ, Burns MM, Naum M. Phylogenetic relationships and reticulation among Asian Elymus (Poaceae) allotetraploids: Analyses of three nuclear gene trees. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;54:10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sun G, Ni Y, Daley T. Molecular phylogeny of RPB2 gene reveals multiple origin, geographic differentiation of H genome, and the relationship of the Y genome to other genomes in Elymus species. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008;46:897–907. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sun G, Komatsuda T. Origin of the Y genome in Elymus and its relationship to other genomes in Triticeae based on evidence from elongation factor G (EF-G) gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;56:727–733. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dewey DR. Synthetic hybrids of Hordeum bogdanii with Elymus canadensis and Sitanion hystrix. Amer J Bot. 1971;58:902–908. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Okito P, Mott IW, Wu Y, Wang RR. A Y genome specific STS marker in Pseudoroegneria and Elymus species (Triticeae: Gramineae). Genome. 2009;52:391–400. doi: 10.1139/g09-015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Garamszegi LZ, Møller AP. Biol Rev; 2010. Effects of sample size and intraspecific variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta-analytic review. (in press) doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00126.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wiens JJ, Servedio MR. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods. Syst Biol. 1998;47:228–253. doi: 10.1080/106351598260897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Junghans H, Metzlaff M. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of total plant DNA. Biotechniques. 1990;8:176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun G, Daley T, Ni Y. Molecular evolution and genome divergence at RPB2 gene of the St and H genome in Elymus species. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;64:645–655. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9183-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Komatsuda T, Tanno K, Salomon B, Bryngelsson T, von Bothmer R. Phylogeny in the genus Hordeum based on nucleotide sequences closely linked to the vrs1 locus (row number of spikelets). Genome. 1999;42:973–981. doi: 10.1139/g99-025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmouguin F, Higgins DG. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Swofford DL. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696–704. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J Mol Evol. 1984;20:86–93. doi: 10.1007/BF02101990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jukes T, Cantor C. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro H, editor. Mammalian Protein Metabolism. 21–132. New York: Academic Press; 1969. vol. III, 24, [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368–376. doi: 10.1007/BF01734359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Felsenstein J. Seattle: Department of Genetics, University of Washington; 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6a2. Distributed by the author. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of the Human-Ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial-DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985;22:160–174. doi: 10.1007/BF02101694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993;10:512–526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. Bayesian analysis of molecular evolution using MrBayes. In: Nielsen R, editor. Statistical methods in molecular evolution. Springer-Verlag Press; 2005. pp. 183–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Larson SR, Jones TA, Jensen KB. Population structure in Pseudoroegneria spicata (Poaceae: Triticeae) modeled by Bayesian clustering of AFLP genotypes. Amer J Bot. 2004;91:1789–1801. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.11.1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Harmon LJ, Losos JB. The effect of intraspecific sample size on type I and type II error rates in comparative studies. Evolution. 2005;59:2705–2710. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Amer Nat. 1985;125:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. Phylogeny reconstruction. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, editors. Molecular systematics. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates; 1996. pp. 407–414. 2nd edition. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wiens JJ, Servedio MR. Accuracy of phylogenetic analysis including and excluding polymorphic characters. Syst Biol. 1997;46:332–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hillis DM. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature. 1996;383:130–131. doi: 10.1038/383130a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hillis DM. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst Biol. 1998;47:3–8. doi: 10.1080/106351598260987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hedtke SM, Townsend TM, Hillis DM. Resolution of phylogenetic conflict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling. Syst Biol. 2006;55:522–529. doi: 10.1080/10635150600697358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Heath TA, Hedtke SM, Hillis DM. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. J Syst Evol. 2008;46:239–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McCormack JE, Huang H, Knowles LL. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design. Syst Biol. 2009;58:501–508. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syp045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jakobsson M, Hagenblad J, Tavaré S, Säll T, Halldén C, et al. A unique recent origin of the allotetraploid species Arabidopsis suecica: Evidence from nuclear DNA markers. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:1217–1231. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msk006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Belyayev A, Raskina O, Korol A, Nevo E. Coevolution of A and B genomes in allotetraploid Triticum dicoccoides. Genome. 2000;43:1021–1026. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gaeta RT, Pires JC, Iniguez-Luy F, Leon E, Osborn TC. Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. Plant Cell. 2007;19:3403–3417. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.054346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mahelka V, Kopecky D. Gene capture from across the grass family in the allohexaploid Elymus repens (L.) Gould (Poaceae, Triceae) as evidenced by ITS, GBSSI and molecular cytogenetics. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:1370–1390. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Taxa from Bromus, Elymus, Hordeum, Pseudoroegneria, Lophopyrum, Thinopyrum, Agropyron, Australopyrum and Dasypyrum used in this study.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file. (89KB, doc)

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES