Abstract
The Health Care Quality Improvement Initiative (HCQII) of the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) calls for Professional Review Organizations (PROs) to undertake pattern analysis of large administrative datasets for the purposes of quality of care assessment. The limitations of such administrative databases (primarily the MEDPAR file and derivatives thereof) include impoverished information regarding clinical attributes of Medicare enrollees and the process and outcome of their healthcare. This paper describes preliminary efforts to address this problem by the creation of a database, the PRO Concatenated Database (PCD), from the pooled implicit judgment review data of four Peer Review Organizations (PROs). The data elements comprising the PCD were carefully selected to provide important information regarding quality and appropriateness of care. Preliminary inter-state comparative studies employing the PCD are discussed. A method is also described by which the analytical power of state-level databases may be enhanced by linkage to state-level Modeled MEDPAR data which are issued by HCFA and contain patient-level risk-adjusted mortality data. This approach to the acquisition of data whose clinical content is enriched may prove to be particularly useful to the PRO community during the pattern analysis phase of the HCQII. Such analyses will evolve into more detailed studies involving primary data collection followed by dissemination of the results to local healthcare providers. In this manner, the PCD may facilitate rapid feedback regarding the effectiveness of healthcare delivery to the local community.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson G. M., Grumbach K., Luft H. S., Roos L. L., Mustard C., Brook R. Use of coronary artery bypass surgery in the United States and Canada. Influence of age and income. JAMA. 1993 Apr 7;269(13):1661–1666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher E. S., Whaley F. S., Krushat W. M., Malenka D. J., Fleming C., Baron J. A., Hsia D. C. The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain. Am J Public Health. 1992 Feb;82(2):243–248. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.2.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jencks S. F., Wilensky G. R. The health care quality improvement initiative. A new approach to quality assurance in Medicare. JAMA. 1992 Aug 19;268(7):900–903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rubin H. R., Rogers W. H., Kahn K. L., Rubenstein L. V., Brook R. H. Watching the doctor-watchers. How well do peer review organization methods detect hospital care quality problems? JAMA. 1992 May 6;267(17):2349–2354. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.17.2349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas J. W., Holloway J. J., Guire K. E. Validating risk-adjusted mortality as an indicator for quality of care. Inquiry. 1993 Spring;30(1):6–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]