Abstract
In an in vitro co-culture system of astrocytes and neurons, stimulation of cholinergic muscarinic receptors in astrocytes had been shown to cause neuritogenesis in hippocampal neurons, and this effect was inhibited by ethanol. The present study sought to confirm these earlier findings in a more complex system, in vitro rat hippocampal slices in culture. Exposure of hippocampal slices to the cholinergic agonist carbachol (1 mM for 24 h) induced neurite outgrowth in hippocampal pyramidal neurons, which was mediated by activation of muscarinic M3 receptors. Specifically, carbachol induced a >4-fold increase in the length of the longest neurite, and a 4-fold increase in the length of minor neurites and in the number of branches. Co-incubation of carbachol with ethanol (50 mM) resulted in significant inhibition of the effects induced by carbachol on all parameters measured. Neurite outgrowth in CNS neurons is dependent on various permissive factors that are produced and released by glial cells. In hippocampal slices carbachol increased the levels of two extracellular matrix protein, fibronectin and laminin-1, by 1.6-fold, as measured by Western blot. Co-incubation of carbachol with ethanol significantly inhibited these increases. Carbachol-induced increases in levels of extracellular matrix proteins were antagonized by a M3 muscarinic receptor antagonist. Furthermore, function-blocking fibronectin or laminin-1 antibodies antagonized the effect of carbachol on neurite outgrowth. These results indicate that in hippocampal slices stimulation of muscarinic M3 receptors induces neurite outgrowth, which is mediated by fibronectin and laminin-1, two extracellular matrix proteins released by astrocytes. By decreasing fibronectin and laminin levels ethanol prevents carbachol-induced neuritogenesis. These findings highlight the importance of glial-neuronal interactions as important targets in the developmental neurotoxicity of alcohol.
Keywords: Ethanol, Neuritogenesis, Muscarinic receptors, hippocampal slice, extracellular matrix, fibronectin
1. Introduction
Glial cells, particularly astrocytes, significantly influence neuronal development, by providing trophic support for neuronal survival, and by modulating neuronal migration, axonal and dendritic growth, and synaptogenesis [1–4]. Neurite outgrowth is a fundamental event in brain development, and is accomplished by signals from the extracellular space such as extracellular matrix proteins, cell adhesion molecules, and soluble factors that can promote or inhibit the growth of neurites [5]. Astrocyte-neuron interactions play a key role in this process, as astrocytes express and release factors that can promote neurite outgrowth, such as laminin-1, N-cadherin, thrombospondin, fibronectin [5–8], or even inhibit neurite outgrowth (e.g. chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan such as neurocan or brevican; [9]).
Astrocytes express various neurotransmitter receptors whose functions in these cells remain for the most part elusive [10]. Among these, astrocytes also express cholinergic muscarinic receptors, particularly the M2 and M3 subtypes [11]. There is substantial evidence that acetylcholine may influence various aspects of brain development, including proliferation of precursors cells, astrocyte proliferation and maturation, and neuronal differentiation [11–16]. We have recently shown that acetylcholine, by activating muscarinic M3 receptors on astrocytes, increases their ability to foster neuritogenesis in neurons, and that this effect is mediated primarily by extracellular matrix proteins [17]. Rat astrocytes were incubated for 24 h with the cholinergic agonist carbachol, an analogue of acetylcholine which is not hydrolyzed by acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and then co-cultured for an additional 24 h with rat hippocampal neurons. Co-culture with carbachol-primed astrocytes increased the length of the longest neurite (identified as the axon by Tau-1 staining), and the length of minor neurites (identified by staining with MAP2) [17]. Stimulation of M3 muscarinic receptors in astrocytes also induced an increased expression and release of fibronectin and laminin-1, which were responsible for the neuritogenic action of carbachol-primed astrocytes [17].
Ethanol is a known human developmental neurotoxicant. In utero exposure to ethanol can cause Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD), whose most severe manifestation is represented by the Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS), characterized by growth retardation facial dysmorphology, and neurodevelopmental abnormalities, leading to long-lasting cognitive and behavioral deficits [18, 19]. The mechanisms involved in the toxic effects of ethanol on the developing nervous system remain elusive; alcohol has been shown to cause apoptotic neuronal death, to inhibit glial cell proliferation, and to alter, through multiple mechanisms, neuronal development. A possible action of ethanol is inhibition of neurite outgrowth, and recent evidence suggests that ethanol may interfere with the ability of astrocytes to induce neurite outgrowth [20, 21]. As ethanol had been reported to inhibit the signaling pathways activated by M3 muscarinic receptors in astrocytes [22], it was hypothesized that it may also inhibit carbachol-stimulated, astrocyte-induced neuritogenesis in hippocampal neurons, by inhibiting the release of neuritogenic factors. Indeed, incubation of astrocytes with ethanol, at concentrations as low as 25 mM (corresponding to 0.115 mg/dl), in the presence of carbachol, followed by wash-out, inhibited the effects of carbachol on axonal length and on minor neurite length by inhibiting phospholipase D [23]. By the same mechanism, ethanol also inhibited carbachol-induced increases in fibronectin and laminin-1 in the astrocyte lysate and in the medium [23]. We are not aware of any other study showing an effect of ethanol on fibronectin in the CNS, but one study showed that chronic ethanol exposure followed by ethanol withdrawal decreases the levels of laminin-1 in the hippocampus indicating that the extracellular matrix is indeed a target of ethanol in vivo [62].
As these studies were all carried out in astrocyte-neuron co-cultures, aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of a muscarinic agonist and of ethanol on neuritogenesis utilizing a more complex system, the hippocampal slice, in which the regional cytoarchitecture, the appropriate synaptic circuitry, physiology and neurotransmitter receptor distribution of the intact hippocampus are preserved [24]. Results show that carbachol stimulates neuritogenesis in the rat hippocampal slice, that this effect is mainly mediated by fibronectin and laminin-1, which are mostly released by astrocytes, and that this effect is inhibited by ethanol.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Materials
Time-pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Charles-River (Wilmington, MA). Anti-laminin function blocking antibody was purchased from Biomedical Technologies (Stoughton, MA), and anti-fibronectin function blocking antibody was purchased from Dako (High Wycombe, UK). Millicell-CM cell culture inserts were from Millipore (Bedford, MA), and coverglass and slides were from Fisher Scientific (Federal Way, WA). Minimum essential medium, gentamycin, horse serum, and Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Cell lysis buffer was purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA). The commercial kit for plasmid DNA was from Quiagen (Valencia, CA). Gold particles, cartridge tubing, polyvinylpyrrolidone, cartridge holder, tubing prep station, and tubing cutter were from Biorad (Hercules, CA). Ethanol was from EMD Chemical Inc. (Gibbston, NJ), while the bicinchoninic acid assay kit for protein determination was purchased from Thermo Scientific (Rockford, IL). All other chemicals and antibodies were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
2.2 Preparation of rat hippocampal slices
Hippocampal slices were prepared from postnatal day 5 Sprague-Dawley rats of either gender, as previously described [25, 26]. The brain was removed and placed into pre-cooled Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS). Hippocampi were isolated and placed on a Teflon stage of a McIlwain-type tissue chopper, aligned perpendicularly to the blade to preserve the structure. Slices, 400 μm thick were rapidly cut (2/s), and transferred to a Petri dish. Utilizing a dissecting microscope, slices were gently separated, and selected individually to ensure the integrity of the structure; damaged slices were discarded. Slices were transferred onto a Millipore insertion in a multi-well plate. Four slices were placed in each well, few millimeters apart from each other. Excess medium was removed, and replaced with complete medium (minimum essential medium containing 20% horse serum). Plates were placed into an incubator equilibrated with 5% CO2 in air at a temperature of 37°C. Medium was replaced the day after the preparation, and 2 hours before transfection.
2.3 Transfection
Transfection of hippocampal slices was done using the Helios Gene Gun (Biorad). Green fluorescence protein (GFP) was expressed in cultured hippocampal slices using the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter. CMV-GFP plasmid DNA was prepared using a commercial kit (Quiagen). Gene gun cartridges were prepared according to the manufacturer’s protocol with slight modifications (Biorad). To prepare the bullets, gold particles and plasmid DNA were mixed with spermidine, precipitated with CaCl2, washed with 100% ethanol, and resuspended in ethanol. This solution was precipitated onto the internal wall of the plastic tube. Slices were bombarded with one cartridge per insert under helium pressure through a nylon mesh that served to reduce the mechanical effects of the air pressure. After transfection, slices were cultured for 72 h before treatments.
2.4 Treatment of slices
Slices were treated for 24 h with carbachol (1 mM) in the absence or presence of ethanol (50 mM). In order to reduce ethanol evaporation, cultures were placed in sealed chambers (Billups-Rothenberg Inc., Del Mar, CA), together with a reservoir tray containing the same concentration of ethanol as in the culture medium [27]. When antagonists were used, these were added one hour before carbachol. Function-blocking laminin-1 or fibronectin antibodies (10 ug/ml) were added together with carbachol.
2.5 Morphological analysis
At the end of treatments, slices were washed three times with HBSS and dipped for 30 min into a 4% paraformaldehyde solution. Fixed slices were rinsed with PBS (0.1 M) for 10 min at room temperature, and placed on a glass slide and mounted with antifade solution with a coverglass. The whole mount was then glued with nail polish. Neurons were imaged on a confocal laser scanning microscope (Fluoview 1000, Olympus, Center Valley, PA), with an Olympus 20X objective. Successful expression was confirmed using epifluorescence. Neurites were imaged using the green channel with 0.35 um steps in the z axis. Each optical plane was averaged twice (Kalman filter). Image stacks were deconvolved using Huygens Essential version 11.0 (Scientific Volume Imaging, Hilversum, The Netherlands) for better visibility of the neurites and the fine structures of the cells. Image analysis was done using Image J version 1.4 with the simple neurite tracer plug-in, selecting Hessian-based analysis option. The analysis was carried out blind; neurons whose processes were intermingled with those of neighboring cells were excluded from the analysis. Neurite length was measured from the point of emergence at the cell body to the tip of each segment as described by Guizzetti et al. (2008). In each experiment, at least four slices per treatment were analyzed. Only pyramidal neurons (i.e. neurons with an oval or pyramidal cell body and a multipolar morphology) were selected for analysis, and a total of 20 neurons per treatment were analyzed. For each neuron, the following parameters were calculated: length of the longest neurite, length of minor neurites, number of neurites/cell, and number of branches/cell (defined as bifurcations in which a parent neurite splits into two daughters; [28]).
2.6 Western blot analysis
Measurements of fibronectin and laminin protein levels in hippocampal slice lysate were performed by Western blot. At the end of treatment, slices were collected in 250 μL of lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.5, and a protease inhibitor EDTA-free mixture), sonicated, and centrifuged at 16,000 ×g. The supernatant was collected, and proteins were quantified by the bicinchoninic acid method, separated by electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membranes. Fibronectin and laminin-1 were detected using specific antibodies. Membranes from cell lysate proteins were re-probed for beta-actin used as loading control. Optical density of each band was quantified by the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
2.7 Statistical analysis
Results were analyzed for statistical significance by repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test, using the Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software inc., LA Jolla, CA). Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD).
3. Results
Exposure of rat hippocampal slices to the cholinergic agonist carbachol stimulated neurite outgrowth. Fig. 1 shows that carbachol increased the length of the longest neurite (presumably the axon, as indicated by staining with Tau-1 in an earlier study; [17]) by about 4-fold. Length of minor neurites and the number of branches per cell were also increased by about 4-fold by carbachol. In contrast, carbachol had no effects on the number of neurites per cell. Ethanol (50 mM) when present alone, had no significant effect on any of these parameters of neuritogenesis; however, it almost completely antagonized the effects of carbachol (Fig. 1). These findings confirm those previously obtained in co-cultures of astrocytes and neurons [17, 23].
Fig 1. Effect of carbachol and ethanol on neurite outgrowth in rat hippocampal slices.
Organotypic hippocampal slices were prepared from PND 5 Sprague-Dawley rats. After four days in culture, slices were transfected with a gene gun, and cultured for 72 hr before treatments for 24 hr with 1 mM carbachol and/or 50 mM ethanol. Slices were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, mounted and imaged using an Olympus FV-1000 confocal microscope. A–D show representative fields of hippocampal neurons: A, control; B, 1 mM carbachol; C, 50 mM ethanol; D, 1 mM carbachol and 50 mM ethanol. E–H show the quantification of morphometric analysis. E, length of the longest neurite; F, length of minor neurites; G, number of branches/cell; H, number of neurites/cell. Results represent the mean (± SD) of a total of 60 cells per treatment from three separate experiments. Significantly different from control, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
We had previously found that carbachol could exert a dual effect on hippocampal neuron neuritogenesis: one indirect, mediated by activation of M3 muscarinic receptors on astrocytes, and the other direct, mediated by M1 muscarinic receptors on neurons [17,29]. As in the hippocampal slice carbachol would be expected to activate both receptors on both cell types, we sought to determine which of the two muscarinic receptors, and hence which cell type, may be primarily involved in carbachol-induced neuritogenesis. Fig. 2 shows the results obtained with antagonists of the four major types of muscarinic receptors. As expected, methoctramine and tropicamide, antagonists of muscarinic M2 and M4 receptors, respectively, had no effect on carbachol-induced increases in length of the longest neurite, length of minor neurites, and number of branches per cell. In contrast, the M3 muscarinic receptor antagonist 4-DAMP (4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine) completely inhibited the effect of carbachol. The M1 muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine caused a small, not statistically significant inhibition of carbachol’s effects (Fig. 2).
Fig 2. Effect of muscarinic antagonists on carbachol-induced neurite outgrowth in rat hippocampal slices.
Hippocampal slices were treated for 24 h with carbachol (1 mM) in the absence or presence of the M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist pirenzepine (PZP), the M2 antagonist methoctramine (MET), the M3 antagonist 4-DAMP, or the M4 antagonist tropicamide (TRP), all at 10 μM. A, length of the longest neurite; B, length of minor neurites; C, number of branches/cell; D, number of neurites/cell. Results represent the mean (± SD) of 60 cells per treatment from three separate experiments. Significantly different from control, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
We had previously shown in astrocyte-neuron co-cultures that activation of muscarinic M3 receptors on astrocytes promotes neuritogenesis by increasing the expression and release of the extracellular matrix proteins laminin and fibronectin [17]. We thus investigated whether carbachol would alter the levels of fibronectin and laminin-1 in the hippocampal slice. As shown in Fig. 3, carbachol increased protein levels of both fibronectin and laminin-1 (by about 60%), and such effect was antagonized by ethanol (50 mM), which alone had no effect on the levels of these two extracellular matrix proteins. The effects of carbachol on fibronectin and laminin-1 levels were blocked by 4-DAMP but not by pirenzepine (Fig. 4), indicating that they are due to activation of M3 muscarinic receptors. To investigate the role of these two extracellular matrix proteins in carbachol-induced neuritogenesis, hippocampal slices were treated with fibronectin and laminin-1 function-blocking antibodies; both antibodies antagonized the effect of carbachol on neuritogenesis (Fig. 5). This latter finding lends supports to the notion that astrocyte-derived fibronectin and laminin-1 play a most relevant role in carbachol-induced neuritogenesis in the hippocampus.
Fig 3. Effect carbachol and ethanol on fibronectin and laminin-1 levels in rat hippocampal slices.
Western blot analysis was carried out in tissue lysate of hippocampal slices treated for 24 h with 1 mM carbachol in the presence or absence of 50 mM ethanol. After protein transfer, membranes were labeled with a fibronectin, laminin-1, or β-actin antibody. A, B: densitometric analysis of levels of fibronectin and laminin normalized to β-actin.; C, D: representative blots. Results represent the mean (± SD) of three separate experiments. Significantly different from control, *p < 0.05.
Fig 4. Effect of muscarinic antagonists on carbachol-induced increase of fibronectin or laminin-1 in rat hippocampal slices.
Western blot analysis was carried out in tissue lysate of hippocampal slices treated for 24 h with 1 mM carbachol in the presence or absence of the M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist pirenzepine (PZP), or the M3 antagonist 4-DAMP. After protein transfer, membranes were labeled with a fibronectin, laminin, or β-actin antibody. A, B: densitometric analysis of levels of fibronectin and laminin normalized to β-actin.; C, D: representative blots. Results represent the mean (± SD) of three separate experiments. Significantly different from control, *p < 0.05.
Fig 5. Effect of fibronectin and laminin-1 function-blocking antibodies on neurite outgrowth increase induced by carbachol in rat hippocampal slices.
Hippocampal slices were treated for 24 h with or without 1 mM carbachol and function-blocking anti-fibronectin (FN) or anti-laminin (LM) antibodies. A, length of the longest neurite; B, length of minor neurites; C, number of branches/cell; D, number of neurites/cell. Results represent the mean (± SD) of 60 cells per treatment from three separate experiments. Significantly different from control, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
4. Discussion
There is substantial evidence that acetylcholine may influence various aspects of brain development [11–16, 30, 31]. Components of the cholinergic system, including choline acetyltransferase and acetylcholine receptors, are present early in development, long before the appearance of synapses [12]. Furthermore, acetylcholine levels are high in the neonatal rat brain (80–90% of adult values), and muscarinic receptor-activated signal transduction systems (notably phospholipases C and D) are greatly enhanced in the neonatal rat [32, 33]. Acetylcholine is believed to have non-transmitter effects during development, as it can regulate morphogenic cell movements during gastrulation, glial cell proliferation, and neuronal differentiation and survival [15, 31, 34, 35]. Developing neurons may fire action potentials and trigger acetylcholine secretion from the axonal growth cone while the axon is still growing, and neuron-released acetylcholine may contribute to further axonal growth and formation of synaptic contacts [36]. Furthermore, astrocytes may themselves release acetylcholine, which may act in an autocrine fashion [37].
Utilizing a co-culture system of astrocytes and neurons, we had previously found that stimulation of muscarinic M3 receptors on astrocytes would elicit an increased synthesis and release of extracellular matrix proteins (fibronectin and laminin-1) that would act as neuritogenic factors on hippocampal neurons [17]. In addition to this astrocyte-mediated effect, carbachol has also been shown to increase neurite outgrowth through a direct action on hippocampal neurons; such direct effect was mediated by M1 muscarinic receptors, and was limited to an increase in axonal length, with no changes in the length of minor neurites [29].
The hippocampal slice provides a mean to assess the effect of muscarinic receptor stimulation in a brain preparation in which the normal hippocampal cytoarchitecture is maintained, and is thus most similar to the in vivo situation [24]. Acetylcholine and cholinergic neurons are widely distributed in the brain. In the hippocampus, the main cholinergic inputs are from projections originating in the medial septum and the diagonal band of Broca, with the septo-hippocampal projection believed to be most relevant for hippocampal function [38, 39]. Furthermore, in addition to extrinsically innervated neurons, cholinergic interneurons also exist in the hippocampus [40]. In the present study we found that in hippocampal slices cholinergic stimulation increases the length of the longest neurite ad of minor neurites, as well as the number of branches per cell. Among the subtype-specific muscarinic receptor antagonist tested, only a muscarinic M3 receptor antagonist blocked the effect of carbachol on neuritogenesis, while a M1 antagonist had a small, not statistically significant inhibitory effect, and muscarinic M2 and M4 antagonists were ineffective. All five types of muscarinic receptors are expressed in the hippocampus, with a predominance of M1 and M3 receptors [41, 42]. We had previously shown that carbachol could stimulate neuritogenesis indirectly, by activating muscarinic M3 receptors on astrocytes, thereby increasing the expression and release of neuritogenic extracellular matrix proteins [17], or directly, by activating muscarinic M1 receptors on hippocampal neurons [29]. The ability of 4-DAMP to antagonize the neuritogenic effect of carbachol would suggest that this action is primarily due to activation of M3 muscarinic receptors, presumably located on astrocytes. Further evidence is provided by the finding that carbachol causes an increase in the hippocampal levels of fibronectin and laminin-1 (synthesized and released by astrocytes), which is antagonized by the M3 receptor antagonist 4-DAMP. Additionally, function-blocking fibronectin and laminin-1 antibodies antagonize the effect of carbachol on neuritogenesis. Altogether these findings suggest that the primary mechanism involved in the neuritogenic action of carbachol in the hippocampal slice is the activation of M3 muscarinic receptors, presumably located in astrocytes, followed by increased expression and release of fibronectin and laminin-1, which in turn exert their neuritogenic action on hippocampal pyramidal neurons. The results are mostly in agreement with those reported in astrocyte-neuron co-cultures [17]. A minor difference between the two systems is that the anti-laminin antibody blocked only carbachol’s effect on minor neurite length in co-cultures [17], while it also antagonized the increase in the longest neurite in the hippocampal slice (Fig. 2).
An important objective of this project was that of identifying and characterizing novel modes of action of ethanol, involved in its developmental neurotoxicity. Pre- and post-natal exposure to ethanol have been shown to affect the hippocampus, as evidenced by morphological and biochemical alterations found in this brain region, as well as by changes in hippocampus-mediated behaviors [43–49]. With regard to the effects of ethanol on neuritogenesis, contradictory results have been reported, with some in vitro studies indicating that ethanol increases the elongation of neurites, and others showing an inhibitory effect [47, 50–53]. We had previously shown that ethanol (25, 50 or 100 mM) inhibited carbachol-induced, astrocyte-mediated neuritogenesis in hippocampal neurons in co-culture, as well as carbachol-induced expression and release of fibronectin and laminin-1 in astrocytes [23]. The same effects were also found in the present study in hippocampal slices. We chose an intermediate concentration of ethanol for these experiments (50 mM), as it was shown to profoundly antagonize the effect of carbachol in the co-culture experiments [23]. As shown in Fig. 1, in the hippocampal slice, 50 mM ethanol almost completely inhibited the effect of carbachol on neurite outgrowth (Fig. 1). In contrast, ethanol had been found to inhibit the direct action of carbachol on neurons (mediated, as said, by M1 muscarinic receptors) only at higher concentrations (75 mM; [54]). Upon in vivo exposure effects on the hippocampus have been reported at blood alcohol concentrations of 40–60 mM [43, 46]. Furthermore, at the same 50 mM concentration, ethanol also inhibited carbachol-induced decreases in fibronectin and laminin-1, which are produced and released by astrocytes [5, 7, 8]. These findings suggest that the effects of ethanol in the hippocampal slice are primarily due to inhibition of muscarinic receptor signal transduction in astrocytes. Ethanol can compete with water as a substrate for phospholipase D, whereby production of phosphatidic acid is inhibited and phosphatidylethanol is formed instead by a transphosphatidylation reaction [55, 56]. In astrocyte-neuron co-cultures, the inhibitory effect of ethanol on neuritogenesis was shown to be due to inhibition of phospholipase D activated by M3 muscarinic receptors in astrocytes [23], leading to decreased release of fibronectin and laminin, and a similar mechanism is most likely to be involved also in hippocampal slices.
Our results in co-cultures [17, 23], and in the hippocampal slice (the present study) suggest that the contradictory results reported on the in vitro effects of ethanol on neuritogenesis [7, 50–53] may reflect the lack of consideration for astrocyte-neuron interactions, as also indicated by other more recent findings [20, 21]. Indeed, perinatal exposure of mice to ethanol results in shorter and less branched denditric arbors in hippocampal pyramidal neurons [57], and in FAS children the size of the corpus callosum (an area consisting mostly of axonal projection) has been shown to be decreased [58–60].
In summary, the present results indicate that cholinergic stimulation of muscarinic M3 receptors in the hippocampus increases the expression of extracellular matrix proteins which in turn stimulate neuritogenesis in hippocampal pyramidal neurons; we also show that this series of events in inhibited by ethanol. These results thus confirm observations after in vivo developmental exposure to ethanol [57], and suggest that the hippocampal slice may represent a relevant in vitro model system to study the effects of ethanol on developmental processes involving astrocyte-neuron interactions. Also of much interest is the role of the cholinergic system in hippocampal neuritogenesis, as this may provide biological plausibility for the observed beneficial effects of choline, a precursor of both acetylcholine and phosphatidylcholine, on hippocampus-mediated behaviors [61].
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by grants R01AA08154 from NIAAA and P30ES07033 from NIEHS. We thank Dr. Andres Barria (Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington) for his help with the hippocampal slice preparation and the transfection, Dr. Pamela Lein (University of California at Davis) for helpful suggestions on preparation and culturing of hippocampal slices, and Mr. Glen MacDonald (Center for Human Developmental Disabilities, University of Washington), for his help with the confocal laser scanning microscope.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Christopherson KS, Ullian EM, Stokes CC, Mullowney CE, Hell JW, Agah A, Lawler J, Mosher DF, Bornstein P, Barres BA. Thrombospondins are astrocyte-secreted proteins that promote CNS synaptogenesis. Cell. 2005;120:421–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barres BA. The mistery and magic of glia: a perspective on their roles in health and disease. Neuron. 2008;60:430–40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pfrieger FW. Role of glia in synapse development. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:2037–47. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0005-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Faissner A, Pyka M, Geissler M, Sobik T, Frischknecht R, Guldenfinger ED, et al. Contributions of astrocytes to synapse formation and maturation-Potential functions of the perisynaptic extracellular matrix. Brain Res Rev. 2010;63:26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kiryushko D, Berezin V, Bock E. Regulators of neurite outgrowth: role of cell adhesion molecules. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2004;1014:140–54. doi: 10.1196/annals.1294.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Price J, Hynes RO. Astrocytes in culture synthesize and secrete a variant form of fibronectin. J Neurosci. 1985;5:2205–11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-08-02205.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liesi P, Kirkwood T, Vaheri A. Fibronectin is expressed by astrocytes cultured from embryonic and early postnatal rat brain. Exp Cell Res. 1986;163:175–85. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(86)90570-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Matthiessen HP, Schmalenbach C, Muller HW. Astroglia-released neurite growth-inducing activity for embryonic hippocampal neurons is associated with laminin bound in a sulfated complex and free fibronectin. Glia. 1989;2:177–88. doi: 10.1002/glia.440020307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Friedlander DR, Milev P, Kathikeyan L, Margolis RK, Margolis RU, Grumet M. The neuronal chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan neurocan binds to the neural cell adhesion molecules Ng-CAM/L1/NILE and N-CAM, and inhibits neuronal adhesion and neurite outgrowth. J Cell Biol. 1994;125:669–80. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.3.669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Porter JT, McCarthy KD. Astrocytic neurotransmitter receptors in situ and. Prog Neurobiol. 1997;51:439–55. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(96)00068-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guizzetti M, Costa P, Peters J, Costa LG. Acetylcholine as a mitogen: muscarinic receptor-mediated proliferation of rat astrocytes and human astrocytoma cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1996;297:265–73. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00746-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Costa LG. Muscarinic receptors in the developing nervous system. In: Zagon I, McLaughlin P, editors. Receptors in the Developing Nervous System. London: Chapman & Hall; 1993. pp. 21–42. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Costa LG. Effect of developmental neurotoxicants on muscarinic receptors and intracellular signalling pathways. In: Shaw CA, editor. Receptors Dynamics in Neural Development. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1995. pp. 305–20. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Weiss ER, Maness P, Lauder JM. Why do neurotransmitters act like growth factors? Prespect Dev Neurobiol. 1998;5:323–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lauder JM, Schambra UB. Morphogenetic roles of acetylcholine. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107 (Suppl 1):65–9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107s165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abreu-Villaca Y, Filgueiras CC, Manhaes AC. Developmental aspects of the cholinergic system. Behav Brain Res. 2011;221:367–78. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Guizzetti M, Moore NH, Giordano G, Costa LG. Modulation of neuritogenesis by astrocyte muscarinic receptors. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:31884–97. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801316200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jones KL. The effects of alcohol on fetal development. Birth Def Res (Pt C) 2011;93:3–11. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.20200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Riley EP, Infante MA, Warren KR. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: an overview. Neuropsychol Rev. 2011;21:73–80. doi: 10.1007/s11065-011-9166-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pascual M, Guerri C. The peptide NAP promotes neuronal growth and differentiation through extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase and Akt pathways, and protects neurons co-cultured with astrocytes damaged by ethanol. J Neurochem. 2007;103:557–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen S, Charness ME. Ethanol inhibits neuronal differentiation by disrupting activity-dependent neuroprotective protein signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:19962–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807758105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Costa LG, Vitalone A, Guizzetti M. Signal transduction mechanisms involved in the antiproliferative effects of ethanol in glial cells. Toxicol Lett. 2004;149:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guizzetti M, Moore NH, Giordano LG, VanDeMark KL, Costa LG. Ethanol inhibits neuritogenesis induced by astrocyte muscarinic receptors. Glia. 2010;58:1395–406. doi: 10.1002/glia.21015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gahwiler BH, Capogna M, Debanne D, McKinney RA, Thompson SM. Organotypic slice cultures: a technique has come of age. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20:471–7. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01122-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Muller D, Toni N, Buchs PA, Parisi L, Stoppini L. Protocols for Neural Cell Culture. New York: Springer; 2001. Interface organotypic hippocampal slice cultures; pp. 13–26. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Opitz-Araya X, Barria A. Organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. J Vis Exp. 2011;48:2462. doi: 10.3791/2462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guizzetti M, Chen J, Oram JF, Tsuji R, Dao K, Moller T, Costa LG. Ethanol induces cholesterol efflux and up-regulates ATP-binding cassette cholesterol transporters in fetal astrocytes. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:18740–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702398200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shefi O, Golebowicz S, Ben-Jacob E, Ayali A. A two-phase growth strategy in cultured neuronal networks as reflected by the distribution of neurite branching angles. J Neurobiol. 2005;62:361–8. doi: 10.1002/neu.20108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.VanDeMark KL, Guizzetti M, Giordano G, Costa LG. The activation of M1 muscarinic receptor signaling induces neuronal differentiation in pyramidal hippocampal neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009a;329:532–42. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.150128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schmidt H. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in chick limb bud during morphogenesis. Histochemistry. 1981;71:89–98. doi: 10.1007/BF00592573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Buznikov GA. The action of neurotransmitters and related substances on early embryogenesis. Pharmacol Ther. 1984;25:23–59. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(84)90023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Balduini W, Murphy SD, Costa LG. Developmental changes in muscarinic receptor-stimulated phosphoinositide metabolism in rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987;241:421–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Costa LG, Balduini W, Renò F. Muscarinic receptor stimulation of phospholipase D activity in the developing brain. Neurosci Res Comm. 1995;17:169–76. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lipton SA, Kater SB. Neurotransmitter regulation of neuronal outgrowth, plasticity and survival. Trends Neurosci. 1989;12:265–70. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90026-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nguyen L, Rigo JM, Rocher V, Belachew S, Malgrange B, Rogister B, Leprince P, Moonen G. Neurotransmitters as early signals for central nervous system development. Cell Tissue Res. 2001;305:187–202. doi: 10.1007/s004410000343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yao WD, Rusch J, Poo M, Wu CF. Spontaneous acetylcholine secretion from developing growth cones of Drosophila central neurons in culture: effects of cAMP-pathway mutations. J Neurosci. 2000;20:2626–37. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-07-02626.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wessler I, Reinheimer T, Klapproth H, Schneider FJ, Racke K, Hammer R. Mammalian glial cells in culture synthesize acetylcholine. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol. 1997;356:694–7. doi: 10.1007/pl00005107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dutar P, Bassant MH, Senut MC, Lamour Y. The septohippocampal pathway: structure and function of a central cholinergic system. Physiol Rev. 1995;75:393–425. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1995.75.2.393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Drever BD, Riedel G, Platt B. The cholinergic system and hippocampal plasticity. Behav Brain Res. 2011;221:505–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Frotscher M, Vida I, Bender R. Evidence for the existence of non-GABAergic, cholinergic interneurons in the rodent hippocampus. Neuroscience. 2000;96:27–31. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(99)00525-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Levey AI, Edmunds SM, Koliatsos V, Wiley RG, Heilman CJ. Expression of m1-m4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor proteins in rat hippocampus and regulation by cholinergic innervation. J Neurosci. 1995;15:4077–92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-04077.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Volpicelli LA, Levey AI. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Progr Brain Res. 2004;145:59–66. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(03)45003-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Greene PL, Diaz-Granados JL, Amsel A. Blood ethanol concentration from early postnatal exposure: effects on memory-based learning and hippocampal neuroanatomy in infants and adult rats. Behav Neurosci. 1992;106:51–61. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.106.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Omoto M, Seki K, Imai T, Nomura R. The effects of ethanol exposure on radial arm maze learning and behavior of offspring rats. Environ Res. 1993;63:109–21. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1993.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Heaton MB, Paiva M, Swanson DJ, Walker DW. Prenatal ethanol exposure alters neurotrophic activity in the developing rat hippocampus. Neurosci Lett. 1995;188:132–6. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(95)11400-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Miller MW. Generation of neurons in the rat dentate gyrus and hippocampus: effects of prenatal and postnatal treatment with ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1995;19:1500–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb01014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yanni PA, Lindsley TA. Ethanol inhibits development of dendrites and synapses in rat hippocampal pyramidal neuron cultures. Dev Brain Res. 2000;120:233–43. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(00)00015-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Livy DJ, Miller EK, Maier SE, West JR. Fetal alcohol exposure and temporal vulnerability: effects of binge-like alcohol exposure on the developing rat hippocampus. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2003;25:447–58. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(03)00030-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Alfonso-Loeches S, Guerri C. Molecular and behavioral aspects of the actions of alcohol on the adult and developing brain. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011;48:19–47. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2011.580567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Messing RO, Henteleff M, Park JJ. Ethanol enhances growth factor-induced neurite formation in PC12 cells. Brain Res. 1991;565:301–11. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91662-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Saunders DE, Zajac CS, Wappler NL. Alcohol inhibits neurite extension and increases N-myc and c-myc proteins. Alcohol. 1995;12:475–83. doi: 10.1016/0741-8329(95)00034-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bearer CF, Swick AR, O’Riordan MA, Cheng G. Ethanol inhibits L1-mediated neurite outgrowth in postnatal cerebellar granule cells. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:13264–70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.19.13264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bingham SM, Mudd LM, Lopez TF, Montague JR. Effects of ethanol on cultured embryonic neurons from the cerebral cortex of the rat. Alcohol. 2004;32:129–35. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2003.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.VanDeMark KL, Guizzetti M, Giordano G, Costa LG. Ethanol inhibits muscarinic receptor-induced axonal growth in rat hippocampal neurons. Alcohol Exp Clin Res. 2009b;33:1945–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01032.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gustavsson L. Phosphatidylethanol formation: specific effects of ethanol mediated via phospholipase D. Alcohol Alcohol. 1995;30:391–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Guizzetti M, Thompson BD, Kim Y, VanDeMark K, Costa LG. Role of phospholipase D in ethanol-induced inhibition of carbachol-stimulated DNA synthesis of 1321N1 astrocytoma cells. J Neurochem. 2004;90:646–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Davies DL, Smith DE. A Golgi study of mouse hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons following prenatal ethanol exposure. Neurosci Lett. 1981;26:49–54. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(81)90424-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Coulter CL, Leech RW, Schaefer GB, Scheithauer BW, Brumback RA. Midline cerebral dysgenesis, dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, and fetal alcohol effects. Arch Neurol. 1993;50:771–5. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540070083022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Riley EP, Mattson SN, Sowell ER, Jernigan TL, Sobel DF, Jones KL. Abnormalities of the corpus callosum in children prenatally exposed to alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1995;19:1198–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb01600.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sowell ER, Mattson SN, Thompson PM, Jernigan TL, Riley EP, Toga AW. Mapping callosal morphology and cognitive correlates: effects of heavy prenatal exposure. Neurology. 2001;57:235–44. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.2.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Thomas JD, Idrus NM, Monk BR, Dominguez HD. Prenatal choline supplementation mitigates behavioral alterations associated with prenatal exposure in rats. Birth Defects Res (Pt A) 2010;88:827–37. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Skrzypiec AE, Maiya R, Chen Z, Pawlak R, Strickland S. Plasmin-mediated degradation of laminin γ-1 is critical for ethanol induced neurodegeneration. Biol Psych. 2009;66:785–94. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






