Abstract
Castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is the main cause of prostate cancer (PC) morbidity and mortality. Newer therapies have only modestly improved survival. CRPC patients’ various comorbidities mean one must treat them cautiously. Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone (CVD) therapy has a favorable risk-benefit profile, and diethylstilbestrol (DES) was used widely in PC. The patient we describe responded remarkably to combination treatment with CVD plus DES. The 77-year-old man had fulminant CRPC with multiple comorbidities and bony metastases in March 2008. In May 2008, his prognosis was dismal: performance status score, 4; pancytopenia; 51 × 109/l platelets; abnormal coagulation profile consistent with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy; and cranial images consistent with dural metastases. We administered one dose of CVD (cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m2 IV], vincristine [1 mg IV], and dexamethasone [0.75 mg PO b.i.d.]) plus DES (1 mg PO b.i.d.). He responded quickly with no clinically significant toxicity. His performance status improved and platelet count increased to 89,000 × 109/l. We administered maintenance CVD (cyclophosphamide, 150 mg/day PO for 21 days every 28 days; vincristine, 1 mg IV weekly; dexamethasone, 0.5 mg PO b.i.d.) plus DES (1 mg PO b.i.d.) for 5 months. In January 2011, nearly 3 years after his initial treatment, he remained alive and well. CVD plus DES may help selected patients with advanced CRPC who are too ill to tolerate or benefit from other therapies.
Keywords: Prostate cancer, Low prostate-specific antigen level, Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, dexamethasone chemotherapy, Diethylstilbestrol, Dural metastasis, Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer among American men.1 When PC progresses despite androgen-deprivation therapy in the setting of low serum testosterone concentrations, it is considered castrate-resistant PC (CRPC). In the United States, nearly all the deaths from PC (~28,000 annually) occur among men with CRPC.1
New therapies for CRPC have emerged as we have gained better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying PC progression and its development of castration resistance. Despite various new treatment options, however, these men survive for a median of only 1–2 years.2 Chemotherapy has a proven palliative role in treating metastatic CRPC, but to date, the overall survival benefit has been modest (i.e., several months) in randomized trials.3-5 Most men with CRPC are elderly and have clinically significant comorbidities (e.g., cardiovascular disease, hypercoagulability, myelosuppression, neurologic problems). Thus, to avoid serious toxicity, one must choose from among the treatment options cautiously, considering a patient’s underlying risk factors for morbidity and mortality. One regimen, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone (CVD), was associated with very mild hematologic, neurologic, and cardiovascular toxicity when used for CRPC in a phase II clinical trial.6 Diethylstilbestrol (DES) has been also used successfully for treating patients with CRPC.7
This report describes the case of a patient with fulminant CRPC, multiple comorbidities, and metastases in the bone and dura who experienced a very gratifying response to a regimen of CVD plus DES.
Case report
A 77-year-old white man had seen his local physician for urinary frequency and nocturia; a prostate biopsy in December 2005 revealed Gleason score 9 (5+4) prostatic adenocarcinoma. At that time, his prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration was 1.1 μg/l, and bone scanning showed no metastases. He was treated with androgen-ablation therapy (bicalutamide and leuprolide acetate) followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (total dose, 7,540 cGy). This treatment resulted in an undetectable PSA level.
In March 2008, he transferred to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for care. The staging workup identified multiple bony lesions involving the calvarium, spine, ribs, hemipelvis, and scapula. His PSA concentration was 0.8 μg/l and testosterone, 23 nmol/l.
In May 2008, the patient was hospitalized with symptoms of clinically significant fatigue, worsening memory, and altered mental status. Cranial computed tomography (CT) revealed contrast-enhanced extra-axial lesions located laterally along both cerebral hemispheres, with slight focal sclerosis of the overlying calvarium, findings consistent with a diagnosis of dural metastases (Figure 1a). Bone scanning revealed diffuse bony metastases.
Figure 1.

(a) Cranial computed tomographic image obtained before treatment illustrates one of the contrast-enhanced extra-axial lesions (arrow) found bilaterally along the cerebral hemispheres of the patient’s brain. (b) Cranial magnetic resonance image obtained after treatment with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone plus diethylstibestrol shows resolution of the previously identified lesion
At that time, the complete blood count results indicated pancytopenia: white blood cells, 2.9 × 109/l; hemoglobin, 6.5 mmol/l; and platelets, 51 × 109/l. His fibrinogen concentration was >20.5 μmol/l owing to acute-phase response, and d-dimer was elevated, at 27.4 nmol/l. A bone marrow specimen was not obtained, although tumor infiltration into the marrow, complicated by smoldering disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), was suspected.
Additionally, because of his rapidly deteriorating condition (performance status score 4 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance scale), possibly attributable to his fulminant PC, he was given one dose of CVD (cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m2 IV], vincristine [1 mg IV], and dexamethasone [0.75 mg PO b.i.d.]) plus DES (1 mg PO b.i.d.). He was discharged and was recommended for home hospice care. His condition perceptibly improved.
At his first follow-up visit, in June 2008, his performance status score had improved. The DIC picture had resolved, with platelets increased to 89,000 × 109/l, d-dimer decreased to 5 nmol/l, and fibrinogen decreased to 6.2 μmol/l. Maintenance CVD (cyclophosphamide, 150 mg/day PO for 21 days every 28 days; vincristine, 1 mg IV weekly; dexamethasone, 0.5 mg PO b.i.d.) plus DES, 1 mg PO b.i.d., was then started and continued for 5 months. During treatment, his PSA concentration remained undetectable.
In August 2008, after completion of the 5 months of chemotherapy, his blood cell counts had recovered and performance status score had improved, he was given two doses of docetaxel (35 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks). His platelet count continued to show an increasing trend during his subsequent outpatient follow-up visits (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Graph depicts the changes in the patient’s platelet counts during nearly 3 years of the course of his disease. Dotted lines indicate the upper and lower limits of the normal range at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
In March 2009, he was considered eligible to participate in an ongoing randomized phase III clinical trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone. In November 2010, it was found that he had been receiving placebo to that point, and he was switched to the abiraterone treatment arm.
In January 2011, when this report was written, he was still alive and well.
Discussion
Overall, this patient’s initial clinical picture was poor, with very short life expectancy because of his advanced CRPC, poor performance status, diffuse bone metastases, symptomatic dural metastases, and DIC. Soon after his treatment with CVD plus DES began, however, his condition improved remarkably. In January 2011, nearly 3 years after treatment began; he was still alive with completely recovered performance status.
Dural metastasis of PC is uncommon and rarely seen in men with CRPC. Some case reports have suggested that the longer survival achievable since docetaxel was introduced in 2004 has resulted in metastases seen more often in uncommon sites, including the cranial dura.8 Indeed, Tremont-Lukats et al.9 showed that the dura is the most common intracranial site of PC metastasis. Dural metastasis is associated with very poor prognosis in PC patients: Lawton et al.8 reported median survival of about 6 months in a group of CRPC patients with dural metastases.
A picture of overwhelming DIC, a serious manifestation of advanced PC, occurs in about 25% of patients.10 In the setting of DIC and possible complete bone marrow infiltration in patients with CRPC, as evidenced by pancytopenia in our patient, overall survival is predicted to be less than 3 months.11 Some agents, including DES, ketaconazole, and docetaxel, are reportedly effective in PC-associated DIC12-14, but the essence of its management is treatment of the underlying condition.
Even though the use of PSA as a surrogate marker for PC detection and follow-up is not satisfactorily sensitive or specific, it has been used to guide treatment decisions for individual patients.2 In some 5–10% of patients, the serum PSA is naturally low, however, and elevation of its concentration cannot be used as an indicator of disease progression.2,15 Further, substantial numbers of patients with low PSA display features of aggressive tumor, including high Gleason score and extracapsular invasion.16,17 Indeed, Bonet et al.18 showed that the prognosis for patients with low PSA levels was not better than that for patients with elevated levels. Our patient’s PSA concentration became undetectable after initial androgen-ablation therapy and has remained undetectable or low despite multiple widespread metastases, including diffuse bony and cranial dural metastases. This low PSA in the setting of metastatic disease suggested that the patient harbored a poorly differentiated carcinoma, although we found no evidence of tumor transformation into a neuroendocrine or small-cell prostate carcinoma.
Oral cyclophosphamide is active against CRPC both alone and in combination regimens19, and vincristine has modest single-agent activity against it.20 Dexamethasone has significantly reduced PSA levels, and a substantial percentage of patients whose PSA decreased also had radiographic evidence of disease regression21, as did our patient. Additionally, glucocorticoids (e.g., dexamethasone, prednisone, and hydrocortisone) produce some benefit for CRPC patients, partly because inhibiting adrenal androgen production suppresses the pituitary.22 Glucocorticoids can also interfere with the activity of several transcription factors (e.g., NF-κB, AP-1) and thus have considerable local regulatory effect on the tissue.23
DES has also been widely used for PC. In patients with non-CRPC, it suppresses the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis and testosterone production.24 According to published reports, DES additionally suppresses adrenal androgen production; this may be the mechanism underlying its usefulness in treating patients with CRPC.24,25
These facts led us to try CVD plus DES as a last resort in the case of this patient. His DIC improved substantially, as evidenced by normalization of his coagulation parameters. He also experienced notable improvement of the metastases, including the cranial dural lesions (Figure 1b), and the pancytopenia resolved soon after treatment was begun. His overall clinical picture improved remarkably as his performance status score improved from 4 to 0. Despite his devastating clinical status, he tolerated this treatment extremely well, with no clinically significant adverse effects.
Conclusion
From our success with this patient, we conclude that CVD plus DES may help certain selected patients with advanced, fulminant CRPC who have multiple bony metastases, dismal performance status, altered mental status in the setting of dural metastasis, and frank DIC accompanied by bone marrow failure. Such patients are too ill to tolerate other therapy, especially standard chemotherapy, which may cause more harm than good. This CVD plus DES treatment is advantageous because it is generally well tolerated, causes minimal bone marrow suppression, and may improve patients’ overall performance status, quality of life, and, possibly, clinical outcome.
Acknowledgments
The study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson’s Cancer Center Support Grant, CA016672. We thank Karen F. Phillips, ELS, for editorial assistance.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Contributor Information
Mehmet Asim Bilen, Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Rosale General, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Shi-Ming Tu, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
References
- 1.Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vishnu P, Tan WW. Update on options for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2010;3:39–51. doi: 10.2147/ott.s5818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, et al. for the IMPACT Study Investigators Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:411–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al. for the TAX 327 Investigators Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1502–12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tu S-M, Millikan RE, Mengistu B, et al. Bone-targeted therapy for advanced androgen-independent carcinoma of the prostate: a randomised phase II trial. Lancet. 2001;357:336–441. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03639-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Daliani DD, Assikis V, Tu S-M, et al. Phase II trial of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone in the treatment of androgen-independent prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;97:561–7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huggins C, Hodges CV. Studies on prostatic cancer. I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res. 1941;1:293–7. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lawton A, Sudakoff G, Dezelan LC, et al. Presentation, treatment, and outcomes of dural metastases in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a case series. J Palliat Med. 2010;13:1125–9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tremont-Lukats IW, Bobustuc G, Lagos GK, et al. Brain metastasis from prostate carcinoma. The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2003;98:363–8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Straub PW. Chronic intravascular coagulation. Clinical spectrum and diagnostic criteria, with special emphasis on metabolism, distribution and localization of I 131-fibrinogen. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1971;526:1–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tu SM, Kim J, Pagliaro LC, et al. Therapy tolerance in selected patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer following strontium-89 combined with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7904–10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.2310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lowe FC, Somers WJ. The use of ketoconazole in the emergency management of disseminated intravascular coagulation due to metastatic prostatic cancer. J Urol. 1987;137:1000–2. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44330-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Talebi TN, Manoharan M, Singal R. Resolution of thrombocytopenia secondary to disseminated intravascular coagulation with docetaxel chemotherapy in prostate cancer. Am J Ther. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181e1cb8c. [2010 Jun 9. Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Goldenberg SL, Fenster HN, Perler Z, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in carcinoma of prostate: role of estrogen therapy. Urology. 1983;22:130–2. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(83)90492-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Leibovici D, Spiess PE, Agarwal PK, et al. Prostate cancer progression in the presence of undetectable or low serum prostate-specific antigen level. Cancer. 2007;109:198–204. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lujan M, Paez A, Miravalles E, et al. Prostate cancer detection is also relevant in low prostate specific antigen ranges. Eur Urol. 2004;45:155–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Meeks JJ, Loeb S, Helfand BT, et al. Characteristics of prostate cancers detected at prostate specific antigen levels less than 2.5 ng/ml. J Urol. 2009;181:2515–9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bonet M, Merglen A, Fioretta G, et al. Characteristics and outcome of prostate cancer with PSA <4 ng/ml at diagnosis: a population-based study. Clin Transl Oncol. 2009;11:312–7. doi: 10.1007/s12094-009-0359-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Saxman S, Ansari R, Drasga R, et al. Phase III trial of cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in hormone-refractory prostatic cancer. A Hoosier Oncology Group study. Cancer. 1992;70:2488–92. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19921115)70:10<2488::aid-cncr2820701016>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schmidt JD, Scott WW, Gibbons R, et al. Chemotherapy programs of the National Prostatic Cancer Project (NPCP) Cancer. 1980;45:1937–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Saika T, Kusaka N, Tsushima T, et al. Okayama Urological Cancer Collaborating Group (OUCCG) Treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer with dexamethasone: a prospective study in stage D2 patients. Int J Urol. 2001;8:290–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gittes RF. Carcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:236–45. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199101243240406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kassi E, Moutsatsou P. Glucocorticoid receptor signaling and prostate cancer. Cancer Lett. 2011;302:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aggarwal R, Weinberg V, Small EJ, et al. The mechanism of action of estrogen in castration-resistant prostate cancer: clues from hormone levels. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2009;7:E71–E76. doi: 10.3816/CGC.2009.n.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Robertson CN, Roberson KM, Padilla GM, et al. Induction of apoptosis by diethystilbestrol in hormone-insensitive prostate cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:908–17. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.13.908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


