Abstract

An efficient, palladium-catalyzed Hiyama cross-coupling reaction of aryltrifluorosilanes with aryl chlorides has been developed. A wide variety of functionalized biaryl derivatives were isolated in good to excellent yields. The scope of this reaction has also been extended to heteroaryl chlorides, affording the corresponding heterobiaryl compounds in high yields.
Metal-mediated cross-coupling reactions are among the most powerful methods of creating carbon-carbon bonds in organic chemistry. In the past forty years, organomagnesium (Kumada-Corriu), organoboron (Suzuki-Miyaura), organotin (Stille), organozinc (Negishi) and organosilane (Hiyama) derivatives have been developed as nucleophilic partners for cross-coupling reactions.1–5 Each of these classes has its own limitations, often because of the instability or toxicity of the reagent. In this context, organosilicon derivatives, known to be easy to handle, stable (toward air and moisture), and less toxic compared to other organometallic reagents such as organostannanes, appeared as interesting partners for the development of cross-coupling reactions.5
Previously, silane derivatives have been seen as poor cross-coupling partners because of the weak polarization of the carbon-silicon bond. This limitation has been overcome through the generation of a pentacoordinate silicon intermediate in situ,2 using a fluoride activator7 such as tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride (TBAF) or an inorganic base.8–12 Subsequently, efficient partners for Hiyama cross-coupling such as organo(trialkoxy)silanes,13–19 organosilanolates,20–23 organobis(catechol)silicates,24 organosilatranes,25 and organohalosilanes26–32 have been developed.
Among these types of organosilanes, organotrifluorosilanes are interesting because of their stability to heat, air and moisture, easy handling, and facile accessibility from commercially available trichlorosilanes.33 Surprisingly, although they have been used in a wide range of metal-mediated reactions as efficient partners,34–39 only a few examples of Hiyama cross-coupling reactions of trifluorosilanes have been reported. The first report came from Hiyama and coworkers, who achieved the cross-coupling reaction of alkyltrifluorosilanes with a variety of aryl iodides and bromides using a catalytic amount of Pd(PPh3)4, but a large excess of TBAF.29–30 More recently, Fu has developed a nickel-catalyzed Hiyama cross-coupling of aryltrifluorosilanes with secondary alkyl halides (iodides, bromides and chlorides).31–32 To the best of our knowledge, there are no examples of aryltrifluorosilane cross-couplings with aryl chlorides. Therefore, we were intrigued to see if they could be suitable partners for this transformation.
Herein, we describe an efficient palladium-catalyzed Hiyama cross-coupling of aryltrifluorosilanes with both aryl- and heteroaryl chlorides for the synthesis of biaryls and heterobiaryls. The catalytic system was first optimized on a model reaction between phenyltrifluorosilane 1a and 4-chloroanisole in the presence of 2.5 mol % Pd(OAc)2 as catalyst. After a ligand screen with various ligands (Figure 1) was performed in t-BuOH as solvent (Table 1, entries 1–3), XPhos emerged as the most efficient, yielding 2a in 71% yield.
Figure 1.
Ligands utilized in optimization studies.
TABLE 1.
Optimization
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | 1a equiv | ligand | additive (equiv) | solvent | % isoltd yield |
| 1 | 1 | SPhos | TBAF (2) | t-BuOH | 53 |
| 2 | 1 | CatacXiumA | TBAF (2) | t-BuOH | 38 |
| 3 | 1 | XPhos | TBAF (2) | t-BuOH | 71 |
| 4 | 1 | XPhos | TBAF (2) | THF | 51 |
| 5 | 1 | XPhos | TBAF (2) | toluene | 47 |
| 6 | 1 | XPhos | CsF (3) | t-BuOH | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | XPhos | NaOH (3) | t-BuOH | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | XPhos | KF (3) | t-BuOH | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | XPhos | TBAF (2) | t-BuOH | 73 |
| 10 | 1.5 | XPhos | TBAF (2.5) | t-BuOH | 78 |
Other solvents were tested (Table 1, entries 4–5), but all of them led to a decrease in reaction yield. When TBAF was replaced with various inorganic bases (Table 1, entries 6–8), no reaction occurred. Finally, the ratio of aryltrifluorosilane 1a and TBAF was studied, and 2a was isolated in 78% yield by employing 1.5 equivalents of 1a and 2.5 equivalents of TBAF at 60 °C.
We then chose to investigate the electrophile compatibility in this palladium-catalyzed Hiyama cross-coupling reaction under the conditions previously optimized. The iodide, bromide and triflate provided the desired product in 95, 88 and 86% yields, respectively (Table 2, entries 1, 2, and 4). The aryl chloride afforded a slightly lower yield (78%) (Table 2, entry 3). On the other hand, the tosylate and mesylate were not effective coupling partners under these conditions, affording the cross-coupled product in low yields. Given the low price and wide range of commercially available aryl chlorides, we used them as the electrophiles of choice.
TABLE 2.
Electrophile Compatibility
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| entry | X | % isoltd yield |
| 1 | I | 95 |
| 2 | Br | 88 |
| 3 | Cl | 78 |
| 4 | OTf | 86 |
| 5 | OTs | 16 |
| 6 | OMs | 24 |
We were pleased to find that a wide variety of substituted aryl chlorides provided the expected biaryl derivatives in good to excellent yields (Table 3). Even the hindered 1-chloro-4-methoxy-2,6-dimethylbenzene could be used with phenyltrifluorosilane 1a to give the coupling product 2d with an excellent yield of 97% by simply increasing the temperature to 100 °C (Table 3, entry 4). We were delighted to observe the compatibility of this reaction with both electron-rich (Table 3, entries 1–5) and electron-poor (Table 3, entries 6–12) aryl chlorides. Notably, a large functional group array including ether, amine, nitrile, nitro, ester, aldehyde and ketone functional groups was tolerated. Substituted 3-methoxy- and 4-methylbenzenetrifluorosilanes 1b and 1c were also suitable partners in this process, affording the corresponding products 2k and 2n in 80 and 81% yields, respectively (Table 3, entries 13–14). Interestingly, scaling the reaction up to 6.4 mmol of 4-chloroacetophenone allowed a reduction in the catalyst loading to 2 mol % of palladium and 4 mol % of ligand, yielding the biaryl 2m in 96% yield.
TABLE 3.
Scope of Aryl Chlorides
![]() | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | silane | Ar-Cl | product | %isoltd yield |
| 1 | 1a |
|
2a | 78 |
| 2 | 1a |
|
2b | 90 |
| 3 | 1a |
|
2c | 70 |
| 4 | 1a |
|
2d | 97a |
| 5 | 1a |
|
2e | 90 |
| 6 | 1a |
|
2f | 75 |
| 7 | 1a |
|
2g | 89 |
| 8 | 1a |
|
2h | 73 |
| 9 | 1a |
|
2i | 91 |
| 10 | 1a |
|
2j | 98 |
| 11 | 1a |
|
2k | 85 |
| 12 | 1a |
|
2l | 86 (96)b |
| 13 | 1b |
|
2m | 80 |
| 14 | 1c |
|
2n | 81 |
100 °C;
Reaction performed on a 6.4 mmol scale using 2 mol % of Pd(OAc)2, 4 mol % of XPhos, 1.5 equiv of 1a and 2.5 equiv of TBAF.
To expand the scope of this transformation even further, heteroaryl chlorides were next examined. 3-Arylpyridines 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d and 3e were obtained in yields ranging from 74 to 94% (Table 4, entry 1–5). 4-Chloroquinaldine was coupled with phenyltrifluorosilane 1a, providing the corresponding heterobiaryl 3f in moderate yield (Table 4, entry 6). Thienyl and furanyl chlorides also reacted, affording coupled products 3g and 3h in 90 and 74% yields, respectively (Table 4, entries 7 and 8). As before, sensitive functional groups such as aldehydes were tolerated under the reaction conditions. In addition, 6-chloroisoquinoline gave the desired heterobiaryl derivatives 3i and 3j in good yields, although it required a higher temperature to cross-couple (Table 3, entries 9 and 10). Moreover, substituted trifluorosilanes 1b and 1c performed as efficient partners in Hiyama cross-coupling with heteroaryls, leading to the expected products 3b and 3e with good yields (Table 4, entries 2 and 5).
TABLE 4.
Scope of Heteroaryl Chlorides
![]() | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | silane | HetAr-Cl | product | % isoltd yield |
| 1 | 1a |
|
3a | 74 |
| 2 | 1b |
|
3b | 76 |
| 3 | 1a |
|
3c | 78 |
| 4 | 1a |
|
3d | 84 |
| 5 | 1c |
|
3e | 94 |
| 6 | 1a |
|
3f | 65 |
| 7 | 1a |
|
3g | 90 |
| 8 | 1a |
|
3h | 74 |
| 9 | 1a |
|
3i | 85a |
| 10 | 1b |
|
3j | 71a |
100 °C.
In summary, we have demonstrated that aryltrifluorosilanes can be cross-coupled with a wide variety of substituted aryl and heteroaryl chlorides. The corresponding cross-coupled products were obtained in good to excellent yields.
Experimental Section
General Considerations
All reactions were carried out under an argon atmosphere. Pd(OAc)2, XPhos and TBAF were used as received. Phenyltrichlorosilane and trichloro(4-methylphenyl)silane were purchased and used as received. Trichloro(3-methoxyphenyl)silane was prepared as described in the literature.40 Solvents were degassed with argon each time prior to use. Standard benchtop techniques were employed for handling air-sensitive reagents. Melting points (°C) are uncorrected. NMR spectra were recorded on a 500 MHz spectrometer. Data are presented as follows: chemical shift (ppm), multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, m = multiplet, br = broad), coupling constant J (Hz) and integration. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on TLC silica or alumina gel plates (0.25 mm) precoated with a fluorescent indicator. Standard flash chromatography procedures were followed using 32–63 μm silica gel. Visualization was effected with ultraviolet light.
General procedure for preparation of organotrifluorosilanes
The organotrichlorosilane (1 equiv) and Na2SiF6 (2 equiv) were heated to 200 °C for 1 h.33 After cooling to rt, the crude mixture was purified by distillation, affording the desired organotrifluorosilane.
Phenyltrifluorosilane (1a).31
Following the general procedure for preparation of organotrifluorosilane, 1a was obtained as a colorless oil (2.95 g, 59%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.52 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.64–7.67 (m, 1 H), 7.76–7.78 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 120.3, 128.8, 133.5, 134.7. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ = − 141.1. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1537, 1589, 3078 cm−1.
Trifluoro(3-methoxyphenyl)silane (1b).40
Following the general procedure for preparation of organotrifluorosilane, 1b was obtained as a colorless oil (1.29 g, 45%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.84 (s, 3 H), 7.15–7.17 (m, 1 H), 7.22–7.23 (m, 1 H), 7.30–7.32 (m, 1 H), 7.41–7.45 (m, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 55.4, 119.4, 119.6, 121.4, 126.8, 130.3, 159.6. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ = − 141.0. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1267, 1507, 1567, 3089 cm−1.
Trifluoro(para-tolyl)silane (1c).31
Following the general procedure for preparation of organotrifluorosilane, 1c was obtained as a colorless oil (2.06 g, 42%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.43 (s, 3 H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.9, 116.8, 117.0, 129.6, 133.3, 134.7, 144.2. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ = − 140.9. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1540, 1609, 3056 cm−1.
General procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes
Pd(OAc)2 (0.17 mmol, 3.9 mg) and XPhos (0.35 mmol, 17 mg) were added under argon to a soln of aryltrifluorosilane 1a–c (1.05 mmol) in t-BuOH (1 mL) in a Biotage microwave vial. TBAF was added, and the vial sealed with a cap lined with a disposable Teflon septum. After stirring for 5 min at rt, a soln of aryl chloride (0.7 mmol) in t-BuOH (1 mL) was added, and the reaction mixture heated conventionally to 60 °C overnight. After cooling to rt, the crude mixture was filtered through a pad of silica, concentrated in vacuo, and purified by flash column chromatography using a gradient mixture of hexanes and EtOAc as eluent.
4-Methoxybiphenyl (2a).41
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2a was obtained as a white solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 84–86 °C, (100 mg, 78%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.86 (s, 3 H), 6.69 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.54–7.58 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 55.4, 114.3, 126.7, 126.8, 128.2, 128.8, 133.9, 140.9, 159.2. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1290, 1579, 3098 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C13H13O [M+H]+: 185.0966; found: 185.0970.
3,5-Dimethoxybiphenyl (2b).42
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2b was obtained as a yellow oil (135 mg, 90%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.85 (s, 6 H), 6.48 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.75 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.34–7.36 (m, 1 H), 7.42–7.45 (m, 2 H), 7.58–7.59 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 55.5, 99.4, 105.6, 127.3, 127.6, 128.8, 141.3, 143.6, 161.1. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1167, 1534, 1589, 3045 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C14H15O2 [M+H]+: 215.1072; found: 215.1077.
2-Methoxybiphenyl (2c).41
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilane, 2c was obtained as a colorless oil (90 mg, 70%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.82 (s, 3 H), 6.99–7.01 (m, 1 H), 7.04 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.32–7.35 (m, 3 H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 55.6, 111.3, 120.9, 127.7, 128.1, 128.7, 129.6, 130.8, 131.0, 138.6, 156.5. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1178, 1508, 1567, 3029 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C13H12O [M]+: 184.0888; found: 184.0889.
2-Phenyl-5-methoxy-1,3-dimethylbenzene (2d)
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilane, 2d was obtained as a colorless oil (143 mg, 97%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.12 (s, 6 H), 3.90 (s, 3 H), 6.78 (s, 2 H), 7.23 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.2, 55.1, 112.6, 126.5, 128.4, 129.7, 134.6, 137.4, 140.9, 158.3. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1234, 1567, 1590, 3028 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C15H16O [M]+: 212.1201; found: 212.1210.
4-Phenyl-1H-benzopyrrole (2e)
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2e was obtained as a white solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 185–186 °C, (139 mg, 90%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.39 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.38 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.46–7.49 (m, 4 H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 110.6, 119.3, 120.7, 126.9, 127.4, 128.2, 128.9, 138.5, 139.9, 140.2. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1123, 1597, 1690, 3043, cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C16H14N [M+H]+: 220.1126; found: 220.1126.
1-Phenylnaphthalene (2f).43
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2f was obtained as a colorless oil (107 mg, 75%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.44–7.47 (m, 3 H), 7.50–7.57 (m, 6 H), 7.89 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.94 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 125.4, 125.8, 126.1 (2C), 127.0, 127.3, 127.7, 128.3, 130.1, 131.7, 133.9, 140.3, 140.8. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1578, 1590, 3067, 3090 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C16H13 [M+H]+: 205.1017; found: 205.1012.
4-(Trifluoromethyl)biphenyl (2g).44
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2g was obtained as a white solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 65–67 °C, (138 mg, 89%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.43–7.46 (m, 1 H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.63 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.70–7.74 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 123.4 (q, J = 272.1 Hz), 125.8 (q, J = 3.7 Hz), 127.4, 127.5, 128.3, 128.8, 129.1 (q, J = 32.2 Hz), 139.9, 144.9. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ = − 62.3. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1545, 1607, 3067 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C13H9F3 [M]+: 222.0656; found: 222.0648.
4-Phenylbenzonitrile (2h).41
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2h was obtained as a white solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 85–87 °C, (91 mg, 73%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.41–7.44 (m, 1 H), 7.47–7.50 (m, 2 H), 7.58–7.59 (m, 2 H), 7.66–7.72 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 110.8, 118.9, 127.2, 127.7, 128.7, 129.1, 132.6, 139.1, 145.6. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1567, 1601, 2307, 3110 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C13H9N (M)+: 179.0735; found: 179.0743.
4-Nitrobiphenyl (2i).45
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2i was obtained as a yellow solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 100–102 °C, (127 mg, 91%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.43–7.46 (m, 1 H), 7.49–7.52 (m, 2 H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.72–7.74 (m, 2 H), 8.28–8.30 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 124.2, 127.4, 127.8, 129.0, 129.2, 138.8, 147.1, 147.7. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1343, 1508, 1643, 3078 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C12H9NO2 [M]+: 199.0633; found: 199.0639.
3-Phenylmethylbenzoate (2j).46
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2j was obtained as a colorless oil (146 mg, 98%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.94 (s, 3 H), 7.36–7.39 (m, 1 H), 7.44–7.53 (m, 3 H), 7.61–7.63 (m, 2 H), 7.78–7.79 (m, 1 H), 8.02 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 8.28 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 52.3, 127.3, 127.8, 128.4 (2C), 128.9, 129.0, 130.8, 131.6, 140.2, 141.6, 167.2. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1234, 1576, 1705, 3090 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C14H13O2 [M+H]+: 213.0916; found: 213.0911.
Biphenyl-4-carboxaldehyde (2k).43
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2k was obtained as a yellow solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 182–184 °C, (108 mg, 85%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.40–7.43 (m, 1 H), 7.46–7.49 (m, 2 H), 7.62–7.64 (m, 2 H), 7.73–7.74 (m, 2 H), 7.93–7.95 (m, 2 H), 10.05 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 127.3, 127.6, 128.5, 129.0, 130.2, 135.2, 139.7, 147.1, 191.8. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1527, 1604, 1689, 3087 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C13H10O [M]+: 182.0732; found: 182.0732.
4-Acetylbiphenyl (2l).41
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2l was obtained as a white solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 118–120 °C, (118 mg, 86%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.62 (s, 3 H), 7.38–7.41 (m, 1 H), 7.46 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 8.02 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 26.6, 127.1, 127.2, 128.2, 128.8, 128.9, 135.8, 139.7, 145.6, 197.6. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1549, 1579, 1721, 3023 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C14H13O [M+H]+: 197.0966; found: 197.0968.
3-(3-Methoxybenzene)-methylbenzoate (2m)
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2m was obtained as a yellow oil (136 mg, 80%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.86 (s, 3 H), 3.94 (s, 3 H), 6.91–6.93 (m, 1 H), 7.16 (s, 1 H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.77 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 8.03 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 8.29 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 52.1, 55.3, 112.9, 113.1, 119.6, 128.2, 128.5, 128.8, 129.9, 130.6, 131.5, 141.3, 141.6, 160.0, 167.0. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1178, 1230, 1567, 1609, 1715, 3067 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C15H15O3 [M+H]+: 243.1021; found: 243.1015.
4-(4-Methyl)-acetylbiphenyl (2n).47
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 2n was obtained as a white solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 116–118 °C, (120 mg, 81%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.41 (s, 3 H), 2.62 (s, 3 H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.66 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 8.01 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.1, 26.5, 126.8, 127.0, 128.8, 129.6, 135.5, 136.8, 138.1, 145.6, 197.6. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1534, 1605, 1708, 3026 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C15H15O [M+H]+: 211.1123; found: 211.1126.
3-Phenylpyridine (3a).41
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 3a was obtained as a colorless oil (80 mg, 74%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.33–7.38 (m, 1 H), 7.39–7.41 (m, 1 H), 7.45–7.48 (m, 2 H), 7.56–7.58 (m, 2 H), 7.85 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.59 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.85 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 123.6, 127.2, 128.1, 129.1, 134.4, 136.6, 137.9, 148.4, 148.5. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1534, 1569, 3089 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C11H10N [M+H]+: 156.0813; found: 156.0811.
3-(3-Methoxyphenyl)pyridine (3b).48
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 3b was obtained as a yellow oil (98 mg, 76%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.82 (s, 3 H), 6.91 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.07 (s, 1 H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.29–7.31 (m, 1 H), 7.35 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.81 (d, J = 7. 5 Hz, 1 H), 8.56 (s, 1 H), 8.82 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 55.2, 112.9, 113.3, 119.5, 123.4, 130.1, 134.3, 136.4, 139.2, 148.3, 148.5, 160.1. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1178, 1549, 1590, 3034 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C12H12NO [M+H]+: 186.0919; found: 186.0911.
6-Methoxy-3-phenylpyridine (3c).41
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 3c was obtained as a yellow oil (100 mg, 78%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.99 (s, 3 H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.34–7.37 (m, 1 H), 7.45 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.52–7.54 (m, 2 H), 7.79 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 8.40–8.41 (m, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 53.5, 110.8, 126.7, 127.3, 129.0, 130.1, 137.5, 137.9, 145.0, 163.6. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1290, 1508, 1567, 3045 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C12H12NO [M+H]+: 186.0919; found: 186.0914.
6-Fluoro-3-phenylpyridine (3d)
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 3d was obtained as a yellow oil (101 mg, 84%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.00 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.39–7.42 (m, 1 H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.52–7.53 (m, 2 H), 7.96 (dt, J = 8.0, 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 8.41 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 109.3, 109.6, 127.1, 128.2, 129.2, 134.9, 136.7, 139.7, 145.8, 162.2, 164.1. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ = − 71.06. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1567, 3089 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C11H8FN [M]+: 173.0641; found: 173.0640.
3-(4-Methylbenzene)-6-fluoropyridine (3e)
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 3e was obtained as a white solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 55–57 °C, (122 mg, 94%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.41 (s, 3 H), 6.97–6.99 (m, 1 H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.43 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.92–7.96 (m, 1 H), 8.40 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.2, 109.3, 109.6, 127.0, 129.9, 133.9, 134.9, 138.2, 139.6, 145.7, 162.1, 164.0. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ = − 71.0. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1569, 1607, 3032 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C12H11NF [M+H]+: 188.0876; found: 188.0879.
4-Phenyl-2-methoxyquinoline (3f).49
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 3f was obtained as a yellow oil (100 mg, 65%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.76 (s, 3 H), 7.20 (s, 1 H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.46–7.50 (m, 5 H), 7.66 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 25.3, 122.2, 125.1, 125.6, 125.7, 128.3, 128.5, 129.0, 129.3, 129.5, 138.1, 148.4, 148.5, 158.5. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1567, 1609, 3065, 3089 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C16H14N [M+H]+: 220.1126; found: 220.1130.
5-Phenylthiophene-2-carboxaldehyde (3g).41
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 3g was obtained as an orange solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 92–94 °C, (118 mg, 90%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.36–7.41 (m, 4 H), 7.62–7.64 (m, 2 H), 7.70 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 9.86 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 124.1, 126.3, 129.1, 129.4, 132.9, 137.5, 142.3, 154.1, 182.8. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1534, 1609, 1789, 3023 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C11H9OS [M+H]+: 189.0374; found: 189.0383.
5-Phenylfuran-2-carboxaldehyde (3h).50
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 3h was obtained as a yellow oil (89 mg, 74%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.80 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.28 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.35–7.42 (m, 3 H), 7.78 (m, 2 H), 9.60 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 107.7, 125.2, 128.9, 129.6, 151.9, 159.3, 177.2. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1567, 1602, 1712, 3078 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C11H9O2 [M+H]+: 173.0603; found: 173.0607.
6-Phenylisoquinoline (3i)
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 3i was obtained as a colorless oil (122 mg, 85%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.45–7.53 (m, 5 H), 7.67 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.73 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.99 (t, J = 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 8.49 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 9.31 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 126.9, 127.2, 127.9, 128.6, 129.9, 131.0, 134.2, 139.1, 139.3, 143.5, 153.0. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1589, 1609, 3034 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C15H12N [M+H]+: 206.0970; found: 206.0971.
6-(3-Methoxybenzene)isoquinoline (3j)
Following the general procedure for Hiyama cross-coupling with aryltrifluorosilanes, 3j was obtained as a yellow solid directly from the chromatographic solvent, mp 71–73 °C, (117 mg, 71%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.81 (s, 3 H), 6.96–7.02 (m, 3 H), 7.38 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.57–7.62 (m, 2 H), 7.73 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.92 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 8.46 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 9.27 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 55.2, 113.1, 115.5, 118.5, 122.2, 126.7, 127.1, 128.9, 129.5, 130.7, 134.0, 139.0, 140.3, 143.3, 152.8, 159.6. IR (neat): ν̃max = 1230, 1524, 1589, 3078 cm−1. HRMS: calcd for C16H14NO [M+H]+: 236.1075; found: 236.1079.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by NIGMS (GM R01 035249). We acknowledge Johnson Matthey for its donation of Pd(OAc)2. Dr. Rakesh Kohli (University of Pennsylvania) is acknowledged for obtaining HRMS data.
Footnotes
Supporting Information. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectral data for compounds 2a–n and 3a–j. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.
References
- 1.Negishi E-I, de Meijere A, editors. Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis. Wiley; New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Diederich F, de Meijere A, editors. Metal-catalyzed Cross-coupling Reactions. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Beller M, Bolm C, editors. Transition Metals for Organic Synthesis; Building Block and Fine Chemicals. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Handy CJ, Manoso AS, McElroy WT, Seganish WM, DeShong P. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:12201–12225. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nakao Y, Hiyama T. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:4893–4901. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15122c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.For a theoretical study, see: Sugiyama A, Ohnishi Y, Nakaoka M, Nakao Y, Sato H, Sakaki S, Nakao Y, Hiyama T. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12975–12985. doi: 10.1021/ja801362e.
- 7.Hatanaka Y, Hiyama T. J Org Chem. 1989;54:268–270. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huang T, Li C-T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:403–405. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Koike T, Mori A. Synlett. 2003:1850–1852. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wolf C, Lerebours R. Org Lett. 2004;6:1147–1150. doi: 10.1021/ol049851s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wolf C, Lerebours R. Synthesis. 2005:2287–2292. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alacid E, Nàjera C. Adv Synth Catal. 2006;348:945–952. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mowery ME, DeShong P. Org Lett. 1999;1:2137–2140. doi: 10.1021/ol991186d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee HM, Nolan SP. Org Lett. 2000;2:2053–2055. doi: 10.1021/ol005956t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ackermann L, Born R. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:2444–2447. doi: 10.1002/anie.200462371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Murata M, Yoshida S, Nirei S, Watanabe S, Masuda Y. Synlett. 2006:118–120. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang L, Wu J. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12250–12251. doi: 10.1021/ja804672m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang L, Qing J, Yang PY, Wu J. Org Lett. 2008;10:4971–4974. doi: 10.1021/ol802049t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.So CM, Lee HW, Lau CP, Kwong FY. Org Lett. 2009;11:317–320. doi: 10.1021/ol802493z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Denmark SE, Butler CR. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:3690–3704. doi: 10.1021/ja7100888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Denmark SE, Werner NS. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:16382–16393. doi: 10.1021/ja805951j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Denmark SE, Smith RC, Chang WTT, Muhuhi JM. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:3104–3118. doi: 10.1021/ja8091449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Denmark SE, Werner NS. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:3612–3620. doi: 10.1021/ja910804u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Seganish WM, DeShong P. Org Lett. 2004;6:4379–4381. doi: 10.1021/ol048044q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Riggleman S, DeShong P. J Org Chem. 2003;68:8106–8109. doi: 10.1021/jo034809g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yoshida JI, Tamao K, Takahashi M, Kumada M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978;19:2161–2164. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yoshida J, Tamao K, Yamamoto H, Kakui T, Uchida T, Kumada K. Organometallics. 1982;1:542–549. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hagiwara E, Gouda K, Hatanaka Y, Hiyama T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:439–442. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Matsuhashi H, Kuroboshi M, Hatanaka Y, Hiyama T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:6507–6510. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Matsuhashi H, Asai S, Hirabayashi Hatanaka Y, Mori A, Hiyama T. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1997;70:437–444. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Powell DA, Fu GC. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:7788–7789. doi: 10.1021/ja047433c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Strotman NA, Sommer S, Fu GC. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:3556–3558. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.For preparation of organotrifluorosilanes from chlorosilanes, see: Damrauer R, Simon RA, Kanner B. Organometallics. 1988;7:1161–1164.
- 34.Matsuhashi H, Asai S, Hirabayashi K, Hatanaka Y, Mori A, Hiyama T. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1997;70:1943–1952. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ikegashira K, Nishihara Y, Hirabayashi K, Mori A, Hiyama T. Chem Commun. 1997;11:1039–1040. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nishihara Y, Kazutaka I, Toriyama F, Mori A, Hiyama T. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 2000;73:985–990. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Saeki T, Matsunaga T, Son E-C, Tamao K. Adv Synth Catal. 2004;346:1689–1692. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nishikata T, Yamamoto Y, Gridnev ID, Miyaura N. Organometallics. 2005;24:5025–5032. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lee K-S, Hoveyda AH. J Org Chem. 2009;74:4455–4462. doi: 10.1021/jo900589x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ernst CR, Spialter L, Buell GR, Wilhite DL. J Am Chem Soc. 1974;96:5375–5381. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bolliger JL, Fresh CM. Adv Synth Catal. 2010;352:1075–1080. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Song C, Ma Y, Chai Q, Ma C, Jiang W, Andrus MB. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:7438–7446. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rao GK, Kumar A, Ahmed J, Singh AK. Chem Commun. 2010;46:5954–5956. doi: 10.1039/c0cc01075h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ueura K, Satoh T, Miura M. Org Lett. 2005;11:2229–2231. doi: 10.1021/ol050590b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Das P, Sharma D, Shil AK, Kumari A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:1176–1178. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kang S-K, Kim J-S, Yoon S-K, Lim K-H, Yoon SS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988;39:3011–3012. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Papoian V, Minehan T. J Org Chem. 2008;73:7376–7379. doi: 10.1021/jo801074g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gavryushin A, Kofink C, Manolikakes G, Knochel P. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:7521–7533. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Stokes BJ, Vogel CV, Urnezis L, Pan M, Driver TG. Org Lett. 2010;12:2884–2887. doi: 10.1021/ol101040p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McClure MS, Glover B, McSorley E, Millar A, Osterhout MH, Roschanger F. Org Lett. 2001;13:1677–1680. doi: 10.1021/ol0158866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





