Skip to main content
European Spine Journal logoLink to European Spine Journal
. 2011 May 4;20(11):1796–1812. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1827-1

The effects of dynamic loading on the intervertebral disc

Samantha C W Chan 1, Stephen J Ferguson 1, Benjamin Gantenbein-Ritter 1,
PMCID: PMC3207351  PMID: 21541667

Abstract

Loading is important to maintain the balance of matrix turnover in the intervertebral disc (IVD). Daily cyclic diurnal assists in the transport of large soluble factors across the IVD and its surrounding circulation and applies direct and indirect stimulus to disc cells. Acute mechanical injury and accumulated overloading, however, could induce disc degeneration. Recently, there is more information available on how cyclic loading, especially axial compression and hydrostatic pressure, affects IVD cell biology. This review summarises recent studies on the response of the IVD and stem cells to applied cyclic compression and hydrostatic pressure. These studies investigate the possible role of loading in the initiation and progression of disc degeneration as well as quantifying a physiological loading condition for the study of disc degeneration biological therapy. Subsequently, a possible physiological/beneficial loading range is proposed. This physiological/beneficial loading could provide insight into how to design loading regimes in specific system for the testing of various biological therapies such as cell therapy, chemical therapy or tissue engineering constructs to achieve a better final outcome. In addition, the parameter space of ‘physiological’ loading may also be an important factor for the differentiation of stem cells towards most ideally ‘discogenic’ cells for tissue engineering purpose.

Keywords: Intervertebral disc, Disc generation, Dynamic loading, Axial compression, Hydrostatic pressure, Mechanobiology

Introduction

The intervertebral disc (IVD) is a cushion-like structure that transmits loads and provides flexibility to the spine [44]. Degeneration of the disc is often associated with ageing, which is characterised by a loss of disc height, a decrease in proteoglycans and water content [2]. Genetic, nutritional, mechanical, environment and behavioural factors (e.g. nicotine [6]) influence this degenerative process [34]. The mechanical load acting on the IVD is particularly important for maintaining a healthy IVD. The normal day-to-day mechanical loading generates biophysical signals to the cells, which regulate the physiologic functions of the disc such that the matrix is continuously maintained and remodelled according to these external mechanical stimuli.

In recent years, our understanding on the influence of loading in disc degeneration and regeneration has been significantly increased. There is evidence that a spinal loading, which comprises the diurnal variation in IVD pressure from a low magnitude (around 0.2 MPa) to a high magnitude (around 0.6 MPa) dynamic loading at a physiological frequency (0.2–1 Hz), is essential to maintain the health and function of the non-pathological IVD. Dynamic loading of a certain magnitude, frequency and duration has been shown to maintain the matrix balance within the disc [70, 71, 122, 127] and even provide a synergistic effect on the differentiation of stem cells towards the chondrocytic lineage under the influence of growth factors [14, 21, 40, 41, 48, 54, 66, 83, 90, 112, 113]. Conversely, prolonged exposure to hypo- or hyper-physiological loading can be harmful to the disc. In an unloaded condition, the IVD swells and starts to lose proteoglycans [118]; static loading causes cell death and induces disc degeneration [4, 67, 68, 89, 110]; a hyper-physiological magnitude and frequency of dynamic loading induces signs of disc degeneration [45, 56, 70, 71, 122, 127]. A comprehensive review on the effect of hydrostatic pressure, osmotic pressure, tensile loading and static compression on the IVD has been reported by Setton and Chen [106]. This review focuses on recent studies of dynamic compressive loading and hydrostatic pressure on the IVD and its implications for IVD tissue engineering using stem cells.

IVD and compression

The IVD is composed of three specialised structures. The nucleus pulposus (NP) is the central part of the IVD and is rich in poly-anionic proteoglycans. The high fixed negative charges of the proteoglycans impart a high osmotic pressure on the NP [114]. The high water content of the NP contributes to the absorption of spinal loads and transmission to the surrounding tissue. The annulus fibrosus (AF) consists of elastic collagen fibres, which encompass the NP and are anchored within to the upper and the lower endplates (EP). The EP form a porous, semi-permeable barrier between the vertebrae and disc and regulate the transport of nutrients into and out of the disc centre.

The IVD is the largest avascular structure of the body; it exchanges nutrients, and metabolic by-products with the surrounding vasculature mainly through diffusion and convection [114, 117]. Changes in interstitial pressure, balanced against osmotic swelling pressure, provide a pumping action for the convective transport of larger solutes such as growth factors, cytokines and enzymes [24, 51, 117, 119, 130].

The IVD experiences a diurnal change in intradiscal pressure according to the variation in day and night activity. High loads are generated by up-right postures and load-bearing activities; lower loads are applied in the supine position. Under high loading, the IVD deforms, the hydrostatic pressure inside the disc increases and fluid is squeezed out of the disc slowly. The loss of fluid increases the disc proteoglycans concentration and the fixed charge density and results in a higher osmolality and a lower pH [114]. In the supine position, pressure is released and hence fluid is drawn back into the disc [1, 60, 73, 76]. Around 20–25% of the disc’s water content is expressed and re-imbibed during -each diurnal cycle [108].

Other than the diurnal fluctuation in load, various daily activities exert different magnitudes and frequencies of load on the spine. Short running duration of 1 h has caused greater decrease in disc height (greater loss of fluid) compared with 7.5 h of static activity in humans [125]. Diurnal cyclic compression enhanced transport of a 3 kDa dextran solute into the disc through the endplates in an ovine disc culture model [28]. Dynamic compression (0.1 Hz, 10% strain, 200 cycles) increased oxygen concentration and decreased lactate concentration in the disc than the unloaded samples in a study using a finite element model [39]. These results imply that dynamic loading may improve the transport of solutes through the disc and hence affecting the metabolism of the disc.

Mechanobiology of the IVD

Loading affects the IVD cell metabolism and fate directly and indirectly. First, the direct mechanical stimulation applied to the matrix results in cell and nucleus deformation, cell volume change, cell membrane stretch, cytoskeletal strain and altered polarisation [107]. Second, the changes in the physical environment around the cells caused by the loading, including fluid content, concentration of proteoglycans, fixed charge density, osmolarity and pH, lead to alterations in the concentration of nutrients, bioactive factors, and metabolic waste products within the disc.

Direct stimulus

Although cellular mechanobiological response is generally cell-type-dependent, studies on the relation between loading and chondrocyte deformation may offer reference information on the IVD cells’ response. Studies on cartilage explants or isolated chondrocytes embedded in agarose or alginate showed that chondrocytes deform under compression, resulting in cell, organelles and nucleus flattening [33, 55, 62, 111]. Cell membrane stretch due to cell flattening activates ion channels and induces alterations in membrane potential and hence affects the cell metabolism [11, 81]. The stretching of rabbit AF cells (5% elongation or 15% area change) has been shown to increase nitric oxide production, to decrease proteoglycan production and to increase apoptosis of AF cells [8, 96, 97]. However, a 2% cyclic strain applied on human AF cells was shown to increase aggrecan and decrease matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) gene expression [85]. Inside the cytosol, mechano-transduction is mediated through cytoskeleton components such as vimentin intermediate filaments, actin microfilaments and microtubules to the nucleus [47]. Such modifications in the cytoskeleton are believed to be involved in the activation of ion channels and intracellular calcium signalling [47]. Compression might also reduce the cell volume, due to cellular confinement and the increase in extracellular osmolality [26].

Indirect stimulus

A mechanism of how loading alters the physical environment of the disc, and its effect on the IVD cells’ biosynthetic activity, has been explained in detail by Urban [114]. She concluded that if the disc deforms under loading, the hydrostatic pressure increases inside the disc. The high pressure forces fluid to flow out of the disc. This results in an elevated proteoglycan concentration, fixed charge density and osmotic pressure in the disc, and an increased osmolality and decreased pH of the disc. On the other hand, the increased intercellular osmolality draws water out of the cells and the cell volume is reduced. Therefore, loading alters the physical environment of the disc matrix, which leads to changes in the water and chemical composition of the cell and its volume. Cell volume changes could affect various membrane ion transporters and alter cell metabolism, resulting in a different biosynthetic activity of the cell [35, 116]. Furthermore, studies have shown that osmolality and pH directly affect IVD cell metabolism [12, 18, 27, 37, 115, 129].

Static, diurnal and dynamic compression

To test the biological response of the IVD to different loading regimes, various in vivo and in vitro models have been developed. Static loading, static diurnal loading or a continuous dynamic loading results in different responses of the IVD [19, 57, 58, 72, 75, 123]. Studies comparing the different axial loadings (static, diurnal or dynamic compression) are summarised in Table 1.

Table 1.

Comparison between static loading and diurnal or dynamic loading

Objective Species/model Load magnitude/frequency/duration Findings
Static vs. dynamic compression [72] In vivo rat tail model Static: 72 h immobilization
Cyclic: 1 MPa; 0.2 Hz; 2 h
AF
Immobilization or dynamic loading: ↓ COL1A1, COL2A1; ↑ MMP-13, MMP-3 gene expression
NP
Static: ↓ COL1A1
Static or dynamic: ↑ ADAMTS-4
Static followed by dynamic: up-regulated MMP-3, MMP-13 gene expression
Repeated static vs. dynamic compression [19] In vivo rat tail model Static: 0.69 MPa
Cyclic: 0.44–0.94 MPa; 0.5, 1.5, 2.5 Hz; 1 h × 14 days
↓ Proteoglycan in static group but not in dynamic loading group
↑ Proteoglycan content at 0.5 Hz within all dynamic compression group
Static vs. dynamic compression [123] Rabbit lumbar IVD with endplates organ culture Static: 0.5 or 1 MPa; 6 h
Cyclic: 0.5, 1 MPa; 0.1 or 1 Hz; 6 h
Most significant cell death at 1 MPa static loading with disorganized AF lamellar, disassociated NP cells
NP
COL1A1 and COL2A1 gene expression in dynamic loading
Constant vs. diurnal static compression [57] Bovine (1.5- to 2-year-old) caudal IVD without endplates organ culture Constant static: 0.2 MPa
Diurnal static: 0.1 MPa, 0.3 MPa in 12 h shift; 4 or 8 days
GAG content: diurnal > static
Cell viability: static > diurnal
Static vs. cyclic compression [75] In vivo rat tail model Static: 0.575 or 1 MPa; 9, 90, 900 min
Cyclic: 0.15–1 MPa; 1 Hz; 900 min
Disc height loss: cyclic > static
Water loss in AF: cyclic > static
Repeated static and dynamic compression at various magnitude [58] Bovine (1.5- to 2-year-old) caudal IVD without endplates organ culture Static: 0.2 MPa; 1 h × 5 days
Cyclic
LOW: 0.2–1 MPa,
HIGH: 0.2–2.5 MPa; 1 Hz; 1 h × 5 days
AF
COL1A1 gene expression in LOW
NP
COL1A1 and MMP-13 gene expression in LOW

COL1A1 collagen 1, COL2A1 collagen 2, ACAN aggrecan, ADAMTS-4 a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-4, MMP matrix metalloproteinase, GAG glycosaminoglycan

In vivo studies

Running exercise studies on animals compared the effect of dynamic impact loading with static physiological loading. Running has been found to be beneficial to disc cells with increased matrix production in a rat model [13] and a dog model [104]. However, these in vivo results may also be attributed to other unknown physical factors, such as the increased production of cytokines by exercise, or a systemic increase in circulatory capacity, but not just to cyclic loading.

In vivo studies using a model with an external loading device on a rat tail allowed the evaluation of the loading itself without other physical factors. It was found that immobilisation provoked a degeneration pattern in the IVD, such as a down-regulation of anabolic gene expression [72] and a decrease in GAG content [19], whereas dynamic loading resulted in an up-regulation of anabolic gene expression [19]. However, one study suggested that a threshold exists for detrimental loading levels, whether static or dynamic. In this study, both a 72-h static loading and a 2-h dynamic loading, inducing an intradiscal pressure of 1 MPa, lead to a down-regulation of anabolic gene expression and up-regulation of catabolic gene expression [72]. It is apparent that the magnitude, frequency and duration of the loading are crucial factors that influence disc health.

In vitro organ culture

Organ culture studies offer a simulated physiological environment for testing the influence of specific factors in a controlled fashion, while preserving the disc cells in their native matrix. In a bovine disc organ culture model, with the endplates removed, it has been demonstrated that diurnal loading was better to maintain GAG content than static loading but little beneficial effect was found with dynamic loading in a human physiological range (0.2–1 MPa disc pressure, 1 Hz) [57, 58]. It is likely that the removal of endplates from the IVD affected the cell viability and the biosynthetic activity of the disc cells [61]. In another study, using a rabbit disc explant model with endplates, anabolic gene expression in the NP of the dynamic loading group was found to be higher than in the static loading group [123]. In general, a dynamic loading pattern is more likely to promote an anabolic response in an IVD organ culture model than static loading. It is possible that a well-designed diurnal dynamic loading protocol may benefit the synthetic activity and anabolic response of the disc, even in the in vitro organ culture condition.

In vitro cell culture study with hydrostatic pressure

The IVD experiences varying magnitudes of hydrostatic pressure during the diurnal cycle. The influence of static hydrostatic pressure has been studied on isolated human and animal disc cells [42, 43, 65] (Table 3). The application of a constant hydrostatic pressure has been shown to affect disc cell metabolism in a magnitude- and duration-dependent manner. A constant hydrostatic pressure of 0.3–1 MPa increased matrix synthesis in bovine caudal disc tissue, dog IVD cells in alginate and even human pathological disc tissue but hydrostatic pressure higher than 3 MPa was found to induce a catabolic response of the disc cells [36, 42, 43, 46, 65].

Table 3.

Effect of Intermittent hydrostatic pressure (IHP) on intervertebral disc cells

Objectives Species/model Pressure magnitude/frequency/duration Findings
Static HP at magnitude and duration response [46] Bovine caudal disc tissue and pathological human disc tissue Magnitude: 1, 2.5, 7.5, 10 MPa
Time: 20 s, 2 h
20 s:
↑ Matrix synthesis 1 MPa in NP; 1, 2.5, 7.5 MPa in IA
↓ At 10 MPa in NP, IA
2 h:
↑ Matrix synthesis 5 MPa in IA
↓ At 10 MPa in NP, IA
Static HP at various magnitude [36] Human pathological disc tissue Magnitude: 0.1, 0.3, 3 MPa; 2 h GAG synthesis:
↑ 0.1, 0.3 MPa in NP and IA
↓ At 3 MPa in IA
MMP-3 and TIMP-1 production:
↑ At 0.3 MPa in IA
↑ At 3 MPa in NP
Static HP at various magnitude [42, 43] Expanded hound dogs, NP and AF cells in alginate beads 0.1, 0.35, 1 MPa; 9 days 1 MPa:
↑ Collagen and PG synthesis in NP but vice versa in AF
COL1A1, COL2A1 and ACAN gene expression in NP and AF
0.35 MPa:
↓ Proteoglycan synthesis in NP and AF
↑ Collagen synthesis in NP but vice versa in AF
Gene expression:
AF: ↓ COL1A1, COL2A1 and ACAN
NP: ↑ COL1A1 and ACAN, ↓ COL2A1
Magnitude response and NO inhibitor [65] Human lumbar (herniated)disc tissue 0.1, 0.3, 3 MPa 0.3 MPa:
↑ PG content, decrease NO production
3 MPa:
↓ PG production, ↑ NO production
Magnitude and frequency response of IHP [49] Rabbit AFC in monolayer or NPC in alginate beads AFC monolayer: 0.3 MPa, 1 Hz, 1.7–2.5 MPa, 20 Hz
NPC 3D: 0.75, 1.5, 3 MPa; f: 1, 10, 20 Hz; 30 min/day, 9 days
AFC in monolayer:
High magnitude and frequency stimulate collagen synthesis
NPC in 3D:
High magnitude and frequency ↑ ratio of collagen synthesis to collagen degradation
Magnitude and frequency response of cells to IHP [31] Porcine NPC in agarose 0.4, 3.4, 6.0 MPa; f: 3/17 min; Low: 10/10 s; High: 12 h/day; 7 days Low frequency:
↑ GAG and OH-proline at 0.4, 3.4 MPa
↓ GAG and OH-proline content at 6 MPa
High frequency:
3.4 MPa ↑ OH-proline but ↓GAG
6 MPa largest decrease in GAG and OH-proline
Magnitude response to dynamic IHP [124] Porcine AFC in alginate disc 1, 3 MPa; 0.5 Hz; 3 h 1 MPa:
COL1A1, COL2A1, and ACAN gene expression
3 MPa:
COL1A1, MMP-1 and TGFβ-1 gene expression
Cyclic strain and IHP [85] Human pathological disc cells in collagen type I gel Cyclic strain: 2%; 1 Hz; 24 h, 4 weeks
IHP: 0.25 MPa; 0.1 Hz; 30 min/day, 4 weeks
IHP:
COL1A1 in AF
MMP-2,-3 in NP
2% cyclic strain:
ACAN gene expression in AF
MMP-3 gene expression in AF
Frequency response of IHP [50] Porcine IVD cells in alginate 1 MPa; 1, 3, 5, 8, 10 Hz; 30 min/day, 3 days Frequency of >5 Hz
↓ Collagen synthesis,
↑ Collagen degradation
Magnitude response of IHP [86] Human lumbar pathological IVD cells and bovine NPC in collagen type I gel 0.25, 2.5 MPa; 0.1 Hz; 30 min (further incubated for 24 h) 0.25 MPa:
COL1A1, ACAN protein
2.5 MPa:
COL1A1A1, COL2A1A1, ACAN;
MMP-1,-3,-13 gene expression
Effect of IHP and cyclic strain under various osmolarity [129] Human lumbar (herniated)disc cells and bovine caudal disc cells in type I collagen gel Osmolarity: 300, 400 500 mOsm
IHP: 0.25 MPa; 0.1 Hz; 30 min
Cyclic strain: 4% strain; 1 Hz; 24 h
IHP: ↑ ACAN, COL2A1 gene expression in hypo-osmosis condition
ACAN, COL2A1 gene expression in hyper-osmosis condition
IVD cells-PLLA construct under IHP [98] Bovine OA and IA cells in PGA-PLLA scaffold 5 MPa; 0.5 Hz; 4 h/day; 11 days HP improved AF cells infiltration
HP resulted in higher COL2A1 protein synthesis by OA cells
Response of healthy and degenerating IVD cells to IHP [63] Human IVD cells in alginate beads 0.8–1.7 MPa; 0.5 Hz; 2 h HP ↑ c-fos, ACAN, SOX-9 and COL2A1 gene expression in non-degenerate NPC but not degenerate NPC
Loading and the release of endothelial cells attractants by IVD cells [84] Human pathological disc cells in collagen gel and HMEC-1 Cyclic strain for AFC: 4%; 1 Hz; 24 h
IHP for NPC: 0.25, 2.5 MPa; 0.1 Hz; 30 min
PTN gene expression 1 h after cyclic strain and IHP
ACAN in AFC, ↓ ACAN in NPC 24 h after loading
2.5 MPa IHP loaded NPC conditioned medium increased HMEC-1 migration
Glucose level and IHP
[100]
Bovine and human NPC in alginate beads Glucose: 0, 0.5, 5 mM; 2.5 MPa, 0.1 Hz, 30 min; IHP ↑ COL1A1, COL2A1 gene expression under normal glucose (5 mM) level
MMP gene expression at reduced (0.5 mM) glucose

CS cyclic strain, NPC nucleus pulposus cells, AF annulus fibrosis cells, IA inner annulus, OA outer annulus, NO nitric oxide, PGA-PLLA poly(glycolic acid)-poly(L-lactic acid), OH-proline hydroxyproline, GAG glycosaminoglycan, COL1A1 collagen 1, COL2A1 collagen 2, ACAN aggrecan, ADAMTS-4 a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-4, MMP matrix metalloproteinase, PG proteoglycan, GAG glycosaminoglycan, HMEC-1 human microvascular endothelial cell line, PTN pleiotrophin, TIMP tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases, NO nitric oxide

In summary, static compression loading of >1 MPa could induce degeneration pattern of the disc, whereas dynamic loading in the form of direct compression or hydrostatic pressure could be beneficial and the response of disc cells to dynamic loading is magnitude, frequency and duration dependent.

Factors affecting IVD responses to loading

Dynamic loading could be beneficial to the biosynthesis of disc cells, but this is magnitude, frequency and duration dependent. It has been shown in various in vivo and in vitro models that a low magnitude of dynamic compression [70, 122] and static/dynamic hydrostatic pressure [31, 36, 43, 46, 50, 65, 86, 98, 124] at a physiological frequency could increase anabolic response, but a high magnitude of dynamic loading causes early signs of disc damage and catabolic remodelling (Tables 2, 3).

Table 2.

List of studies comparing influences of magnitude, frequency and duration of the dynamic compression acting on the IVD

Objective Species/model Loading magnitude/frequency/duration Findings
One time loading at different magnitude and frequency [70] In vivo rat tail model Cyclic: 1 or 0.2 MPa; 1, 0.2, 0.01 Hz; 2 h Largest ↓ in disc height at 1 Hz
AF
↑ Catabolic genes at all frequency of 0.2 MPa
More sensitive to magnitude of load than frequency
Suggested at 0.2 MPa and 0.2 Hz do not alter disc metabolism
NP
↑ Anabolic gene expression at 1 MPa, 0.01 Hz
More sensitive to frequency of loading
Magnitude and frequency response of repeated compression [122] In vivo rat tail model 0.9, 1.3 MPa; 0.1, 0.01 Hz; 6 h × 7 days Higher proteoglycan content in all group except at 0.9 MPa, 0.1 Hz
AF
Increased apoptotic cells at low frequency, low stress
Higher COL2A1 expression at 1.3 MPa
NP
Higher apoptotic cells at 1.3 MPa, little effect on frequency
Duration response of a single loading event [71] In vivo rat tail model 1 MPa; 1 Hz; 0.5, 2, 4 h AF
Larger up-regulation in catabolic gene at 4 h loading than 0.5 or 2 h
2 h or 4 h loading up-regulated both anabolic and catabolic gene
NP
↑ Anabolic gene at 0.5 or 2 h
Largest ↑ catabolic genes at 2 h
Duration response of compression [127] In vivo rat tail model 1 MPa; 1 Hz; 1.5 h × 14 days or 8 h × 14 days or 8 h × 56 days ↓ Disc height, ↑ in water content, increase GAG in NP, ↓ GAG in AF
AF
↑ Anabolic gene and ↓ in catabolic genes at 1.5 h × 14 days
NP
Up-regulation of anabolic gene at 8 h × 14 days
Age of the samples and their response to frequency of the compression [56] Bovine young (4–6 m), mature (18–24 m); NP, AF cells in alginate Axial compression; 2–12%; 0.1, 1, 3 Hz; 2 h × 7 days Age response
AF
Lower GAG/DNA, COL1A1 and ACAN gene expression in young < mature
Higher MMP-3 expression young > mature
NP
Lower GAG/DNA in mature animal
Lower COL1A1, COL2A1 gene expression in young animal
Frequency response
AF
Higher COL1A1, MMP-3 at high frequency > static control
Lower COL2A1, ACAN at higher frequency > static control
NP
Higher MMP-3 at 0.1 and 1 Hz > static control
Repetitive dynamic compression at various frequency vs. glucose supply [45] Ovine (2–5 years) caudal IVD with endplates organ culture 0.6 MPa ± 0.2 × 16 h (0.2 or 10 Hz) + 0.2 MPa × 8 h
Glucose level: 2 or 4.5 g/L
↑ Cell death at high frequency, high glucose, and low glucose, low frequency conditions
Exacerbated cell death and up-regulation in MMP-13 gene expression in high frequency, low glucose condition

COL1A1 collagen 1, COL2A1 collagen 2, ACAN aggrecan, ADAMTS-4 a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-4, MMP matrix metalloproteinase, GAG glycosaminoglycan

Magnitude response: axial compression

The effect of the magnitude of dynamic compression was compared [58] in an in vitro culture system using bovine discs cultured without endplates. It was suggested that dynamic compression of 0.2–1 MPa, for 1 h/day for 5 days, increases the disc’s metabolic rate and enhances anabolic remodelling, whereas compression of 0.2–2.5 MPa induces catabolic response in the disc. Another study using an in vivo rat tail model showed a higher amount of apoptotic cells in the NP when the disc was subjected to dynamic compression of greater than 1.3 MPa [122], whereas 0.9 MPa [122] or 1 MPa [70] dynamic compression was favourable for anabolic responses.

Response to amplitude modulation: hydrostatic pressure

Similar to the findings on axial compression, applying hydrostatic pressure of greater than 2.5 MPa magnitude resulted in a degenerative response of the IVD cells. Decreased anabolic gene expression and increased catabolic gene expression were found on isolated porcine NP cells [31] and AF cells [124], bovine NP cells and human IVD cells [86] using a hydrostatic pressure loading system. Overloading of disc cells even increased the chemokine synthesis, which caused an enhanced migration of endothelial cells [84]. Exceptionally, Kasra et al. [49] found an increased ratio of collagen synthesis to degradation for isolated rabbit IVD cells when hydrostatic pressure of magnitude 3 MPa was applied at 20 Hz. These results suggest that dynamic hydrostatic pressure of magnitude lower than 2.5 MPa might be beneficial to disc cells but there may be variation across different species and a frequency-dependent response. However, when considering studies using isolated cells, the digestion of the extracellular matrix during cell isolation disrupts the in situ environment; therefore, such systems completely lack the signal transduction from the matrix to the cells.

Response to frequency modulation

The IVD experiences different frequencies of loading during, e.g. walking, running or sitting in a car, tractor or helicopter. Exposure to whole body high frequency loading/vibration was found to be associated with low back pain and disc degeneration [10, 92]. Loading rate influences the extent of disc deformation, possibly also the rate of fluid flow in and out of the disc [88, 95], and affects the biosynthesis of the IVD cell. A lower loading frequency of 0.5 Hz was found to be the best of the tested conditions (0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 Hz) in preserving proteoglycan content of the rat tail model [19]. With the same model, MacLean et al. [70] demonstrated that 0.2 Hz was the best among the tested frequencies (0.01, 0.2 and 1 Hz) in preserving normal disc metabolism. The authors suggested that a “maintenance” stimulus of 0.2 Hz and 0.2 MPa sustained the steady state of structural mRNA transcription and that alterations above or below this loading level would result in remodelling, repair or degeneration [70]. For example, hypo-physiological loading frequency of 0.01 Hz in a rat tail model [122] or ultra-high frequency (10 Hz) in an ovine explant model [45] resulted in increased number of apoptotic cells. Frequency response is also relevant for stimulation by hydrostatic pressure. It has been found that a frequency of >5 Hz of 1 MPa intermittent hydrostatic pressure (IHP) impaired collagen synthesis [50].

Time response

The total time of exposure to mechanical loading is another important factor, which affects the biological response of the disc. Wuertz et al. [127] suggested that the disc responded anabolically to dynamic compression at a high daily exposure, such as 8 h/day instead of 1.5 h/day. For instance, a 2-week dynamic compression of 8 h/day at 1 MPa and 1 Hz caused up-regulation of anabolic gene expression in the NP of the rat tail. However, extended period of loading of the same magnitude for 8 weeks caused accumulation of mild degeneration. It was suggested that cyclic compression at a moderate level simulates physical activities and that this physiological loading might be able to promote repair or postpone disc degeneration. The duration response of IHP on the IVD cells has not been specifically reported in the literature, but an increased anabolic gene expression by human disc cells was demonstrated either after a single 30-min loading [86] or 30-min daily for 4 weeks [85].

Region-specific response

It has been shown that the expression of anabolic and catabolic genes by the IVD cells resulting from mechanical stimulation is region specific [70]. The difference in frequency response in different regions of the disc can be explained from the mechanical point of view. A greater peak-to-peak displacement of the IVD was found at low frequency (0.01 Hz) than high frequency (1 Hz) loading [70], in which the tissue modulus increases with frequency and so the strain decreases. This indicates a lesser deformation of the IVD at high frequency than low frequency at the same magnitude of load. Thus, higher hydrostatic pressures and smaller solid matrix strains were developed under high frequency loading. Therefore, it is likely that the AF response is dominated by deformation-related stimulus, which is more related to the magnitude of the loading where NP response is dominated by hydrostatic pressurisation, which is more related to frequency of the loading [5]. In a study of IHP, Kasra et al. [50] also reported a magnitude-dependent and frequency-dependent response of collagen synthesis in porcine AF and NP cells, respectively. Furthermore, a long duration of loading (8 h/day) was beneficial for the NP, but was degenerative in the AF [127]. It is unclear why the duration of loading resulted in a different response in the NP and the AF; it could be due to the fundamental difference in the characteristic of the cell types or the matrix environment of the two compartments.

Nutrition

Impaired endplate permeability caused by endplates calcification or sclerosis hinders the nutrition supply to the disc [9, 82, 109, 120]. When the IVD cells are in a reduced glucose environment, mechanical loading does more harm than good. Under limited glucose supply, axial compression applied on an ovine caudal disc organ culture model [45] or IHP applied on NP cells in alginate beads [100], resulted in elevated MMPs gene expression and/or protein expression. These negative responses were more prominent under hyper-physiological (10 Hz) loading frequency [45].

Other factors

Condition of the disc cells also influences the response of the cells to loading. When NP cells were cultured in various osmotic conditions and exposed to the same IHP, hypo- and hyper-osmotic condition resulted in an anabolic and catabolic response, respectively [129]. This may imply that the initial volume of the cells affects their response to mechanical stimulus. The response of disc cells to loading is also different between ‘healthy’ and degenerated disc cells, and between young and mature animal disc cells. When isolated ‘healthy’ or degenerated human disc cells were exposed to IHP at physiological range, ‘healthy’ disc cells increased the anabolic gene expression while no response was detected in the degenerated disc cells [63]. This may be explained by the altered mechanical transduction mechanism between the degenerated disc cells and the healthy disc cells [64]. Young bovine caudal disc cells (6-month old) respond to axial compression with decreased anabolic gene expression but a higher GAG/DNA ratio than mature cells (18- to 24-month old) [56].

In summary, it is suggested that dynamic axial compression of magnitude 0.2–0.8 MPa, frequency of 0.1–1 Hz (Fig. 1) and a duration of 8 h/day is within the physiological loading level in which structural mRNA level and metabolism are maintained, and may not induce remodelling, repair or degeneration of the disc. For hydrostatic pressure, a magnitude of 0.1 to 2.5 MPa, frequency of <5 Hz and 30 min–4 h of loading per day are beneficial to isolated cells in 3D culture, but the duration of loading may vary with different in vitro systems and/or animal models used. The summarised “physiological” loading parameter space offers a potential beneficial loading regime for disc regeneration or for testing tissue engineering approaches for IVD repair.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Influences of magnitude and frequency of the dynamic compression acting on the IVD. Square in dotted line indicates possible physiological loading magnitude and frequency for the intervertebral disc. Plus symbol, lighter circle Increase in anabolic gene (collagen 1, collagen 2, or aggrecan); lighter times symbol decrease in anabolic gene; thin times symbol, thin circle increase in catabolic gene (Adamts-4: a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-4, MMP-3 or MMP-13 MMP: matrix metalloproteinase); thick times symbol, thick circle increase in apoptotic cells or decrease in cell viability [45, 58, 70, 72, 122, 123]

IVD tissue engineering

Tissue engineering is an emerging field of study for the biological therapy of IVD degeneration. Due to the difficulty in acquiring healthy disc cells, multipotent stem cells, e.g. mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), has been an option for IVD regeneration and tissue engineering, with their potential for self-renewal and differentiation into various cell lineages. MSCs can differentiate into various cell lineages, including adipocyte, osteoblast, chondrocyte, myoblast, and tenocyte [15, 91]; it may thus be likely that MSCs can be differentiated into IVD-like cells for tissue engineering applications. MSC differentiation can be directed by different factors, such as growth factors, or more importantly by mechanical factors, including shear, tension, compressive strain and hydrostatic pressure, all depending on the local environment such as matrix stiffness and structural arrangement, and the resulting cell shape and morphology differences, pH, oxygen and nutrient supply [52, 93].

MSCs in the IVD environment

The complex mechanical role of the IVD and the lack of vasculature make the IVD a “harsh” environment for cells. It is presented as low glucose and oxygen levels, high osmolarity, is acidic and experiences fluctuations in load and the resulting hydrostatic pressure. These conditions could jeopardise MSC survival in the disc environment. A very low initial MSC survival inside the IVD has been reported [17, 20]. On the other hand, in vivo studies have shown that MSCs inside the IVD can differentiate into matrix producing cells [59, 99]. The response of the MSC in each specific mechanical condition of the IVD has been studied. Cyclic compression [40, 48, 66, 90] and hydrostatic pressure [21, 53, 79] can promote chondrogenic differentiation of the MSC (Tables 4, 5). Furthermore, the high volumetric stress environment of the IVD could direct MSC differentiation towards a chondrogenic phenotype [16, 94]. Hypoxia has been shown to impair adipogenesis and osteogenesis of human MSCs [38], and as a potent chondrogenesis promoter than dynamic compression or hydrostatic pressure in the presence of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) [7, 74, 77, 105]. Nevertheless, low oxygen tension and hydrostatic pressure alone without TGF-β could not initiate chondrogenesis of MSC [105]. A low glucose condition stimulates anabolic gene expression of MSCs [128]. An acidic environment and high osmolarity, as in the IVD, decrease MSC proliferation and viability, alter MSC morphology and inhibit anabolic gene expression [126, 128]. Overall, the disc environment certainly contains not only factors that favour MSC differentiation towards matrix producing cells but also factors that may hinder MSC survival.

Table 4.

Effect of cyclic compressive loading on stem cells

Objective Species/model Type of load/force/duration Findings
CD under static or dynamic compression [23] Chick (23/24 embryos) limb bud MSC in agarose Static: 4.5 kPa; 2 h × 3 days
Dynamic: 0.25–9.0 kPa; 0.33 Hz; 2 h/day × 3 days
Enhanced CD by dynamic compression but not static loading
Frequency and duration response of MSC to cyclic loading [22] Chick (23/24 embryos) limb bud MSC in agarose 0.25–9.25 kPa; 0.03, 0.15 or 0.33 Hz; 12, 54 or 120 min × 3 days Enhanced CD at frequency > 0.15 Hz
At 0.33 Hz, CD is enhanced by loading for 54 or 120 min
CD under dynamic compression vs. TGF-β [40] Rabbit (3 m) bone marrow MSC in agarose with TGF-β and dexamethasone 10% strain; 1 Hz; 4 h × 3, 7, 14 days Cyclic compression alone induces MSC CD as effectively as TGF-β
Loading ↑ TGF-β1 gene expression
CD under dynamic compression [41] Rabbit (3 m) bone marrow MSC in agarose 15% strain; 1 Hz; 4 h/day × 2 days ↑ gene expression and production of proteins of Sox9, c-jun, and TGF-β receptors
CD under static or dynamic compression in the presence or absence of TGF-β [14] Human bone marrow MSC in alginate or pellet culture with TGF-β 15% strain; 1 Hz; 10 days Dynamic loading alone induced chondrogenesis
↑ Chondrogenic marker expression in dynamically loaded and TFG-β presence sample
+TGF-β: ↑ COLXA1, ↓ ACAN
−TGF-β: ↑ COLXA1
Duration response of dynamic compression, in the presence or absence of TGF-β [112] Goat (3-year-old) bone marrow MSC; hEBd in PEGDA with or without TGF-β 10% strain; 1 Hz; 1, 2, 2.5, 4 h/day; 1, 2, and 3 weeks In the absence of TGF-β1:
Dynamic loading induces MSC CD
Dynamic loading inhibited hEBd CD
Dynamic loading enhanced CD when hEBd was pre-conditioned with TGF-β1
Duration of MSC pre-conditioning with CD medium and dynamic loading [83] Calf bone marrow MSC in agarose with or without TGF-β and dexamethasone 10% strain; 1 Hz; 3 h; 16 days ↑ Chondrogenic gene expression and matrix synthesis by dynamic loading with TGF-β and dexamethasone
Effect of cyclic loading vs. free swelling on CD of MSC [113] Porcine (4 m) bone marrow MSC in alginate with TGF-β 10% strain; 0.5 Hz; 1 h/day; 42 days GAG accumulation: dynamically loaded sample < free swelling sample
CD of MSC under TGF -β1 or dynamic loading stimulation [54] Equine (2- to 5-year-old) bone marrow MSC in agarose with or without TGF-β and dexamethasone 10% strain; 0.3 Hz; 3 h/day every alternate day or 12 h/day; 21 days ↑ Chondrogenic marker gene expression in the presence of TGF-β1 or 12 h daily dynamic loading
Frequency response of MSC towards CD [90] Human bone marrow MSC in fibrin gel (40, 60, 80 mg/mL) 10% strain; 0.1, 0.5 or 1 Hz; 4 h × 3 days CD is enhanced at frequency > 0.5 Hz
CD under dynamic compression and TGF-β [66] Human bone marrow MSC in fibrin polyurethane scaffold with or without TGF-β and dexamethasone 10–20% strain; 1 Hz; 1 h × 7 days Cyclic compression alone induces MSC CD
↑ Gene expression and the protein synthesis of TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 by MSC
CD under static or dynamic compression [48] Rabbit (250–400 g) bone marrow MSC in PLCL with TGF-β 5% strain; 0.1 Hz, 10 days ↑ GAG content
↑ Protein and gene expression of COL2A1 and ACAN in dynamically loaded scaffold

CD chondrogenic differentiation, PLCL poly(lactide-co-caprolactone), MSC mesenchymal stem cell, PEGDA poly (ethylene glycol)-diacrylate hydrogels, hEBd human embryoid body-derived cells, GAG glycosaminoglycan, COLXA1 collagen 10, ACAN aggrecan, COL2A1 collagen 2, TGF transforming growth factor

Table 5.

Hydrostatic pressure and stem cell (SC) chondrogenic differentiation (CD)

Objectives Species/model Loading magnitude/frequency/duration/others Findings
Duration of IHP and CD of MSC [3] Human bone marrow MSC in pellet with TGF-β and dexamethasone IHP 0.55–5 MPa; 4 h/day; 1 or 7 days, total culture time 14 or 28 days 7 days loading ↑ GAG and collagen content but not single loading event
Influence of oxygen tension, IHP, and TGF-β on MSC CD [105] Bovine bone marrow MSC in collagen membrane with TGF-β and dexamethasone IHP: 0.2 MPa; 30/2 min; 24 h; 2 non-consecutive days
Oxygen tension: 5, 21%
Low oxygen tension and IHP is not sufficient to induce CD
Low oxygen tension enhance CD in TGF-β
Duration of IHP and CD [21] Murine embryonic fibroblast (C3H/10T1/2) in monolayer IHP: 0.3–5 MPa; 1 Hz; 30 min/day or 2 h/day; 3 days 2 h/day IHP ↑ GAG, OH-proline synthesis
IHP, TGF-β and CD [80] Human MSC in pellet with TGF-β IHP: 10 MPa; 1 Hz; 4 h/day; 3, 7, 14 days ↑ CD marker gene (SOX-9, COL2A1, ACAN) expression IHP < TGF-β < IHP + TGF-β
Magnitude and duration response [79] Human MSC in pellet IHP: 0.1, 1,10 MPa; 1 Hz; 4 h/day; 3, 7, 14 days Magnitude:
SOX9, ACAN in all magnitude
COL2A1, OH-proline in 10 MPa
↑ GAG at 1 and 10 MPa
Duration:
↑ GAG content at 7, 14 days
↑ OH-proline content at 3, 7, 14 days
Effect of PHP on pre-differentiated MSC [69] Ovine bone marrow MSC differentiated in TGF-β3 for 4 weeks in polyester scaffolds PHP: 0.1 MPa; 0.25 Hz; 30 min/day; 4, 7, 10 days ↑ DNA, GAG, collagen content with PHP than unloaded control at day 10
Difference between steady or ramped IHP [25] Human MSC in 2% agarose Steady: 7.5 MPa
Ramped: 1–7.5 MPa (0.5 MPa increase/d); 1 Hz; 4 h/day; 4, 9, 14 days
COL1A1 at steady high HP at d4
COL1A1 for both loading group at d14
MSC differentiation under IHP and multiple differentiation factors [121] Human MSC seeded in type I collagen sponges in TGF-β1 and β-glycerol-phosphate 1 MPa; 1 Hz, 4 h/day; 10 days COL1A1, COL2A1, ACAN, SOX9 gene expression with IHP, no change in RUNX2 and TGF-β1
Effect of IHP, TGF-β, BMP-2 on stem cells CD [131] Bovine bone marrow MSC aggregates in TGF-β, BMP-2 and dexamethasone 0.5–3 MPa; 1 Hz; 1 h/day; 14 days TGF-β ↑ CD
But not enhanced with IHP or BMP-2
IHP on CD of adipose-derived SC [87] Human adipose-derived SC in collagen scaffold with TGF-β, dexamethansone 0-0.5 MPa; 0.5 Hz; 1 week; further unloaded culture of 1, 2, 3 weeks ↑ Cell number ↑ COL2A1, COLXA1, ACAN, SOX9 gene expression in IHP > unloaded control after 4 weeks
IHP on NP co-cultured MSC [53] Rabbit MSC and NPC in alginate beads 0.2–0.5 MPa; 2/15 min; 4 h/day; 3 days Co-culture MSC and NP, and IHP synergistically increased ACAN, SOX-9 gene expression

IHP intermittent hydrostatic pressure, PHP pulsatile hydrostatic pressure, MSC mesenchymal stem cell, OH-proline hydroxyproline, GAG glycosaminoglycan, COL1A1 collagen 1, COL2A1 collagen 2, COLXA1 collagen 10, ACAN aggrecan, TGF transforming growth factor, BMP bone morphological protein

MSC and dynamic loading

The basic function of the IVD is to provide mechanical support to the spine and therefore the mechanical loading regime applied to the cells used for IVD tissue engineering should be carefully evaluated. The effect of short-term to mid-term cyclic compression (Table 4) and hydrostatic pressure (Table 5) on MSCs has been studied. In the absence of TGF-β, dynamic compression together with dexamethasone could initiate chondrogenesis of rabbit MSCs [40, 48] and human MSCs [66, 90]. However, in some studies, dynamic compression inhibited chondrogenesis of porcine MSC [113] and human embryoid body-derived cells (hEBd) [112]. It has been suggested that dynamic compression applied before the initiation of chondrogenesis, e.g. exposure to growth factors, would inhibit later chondrogenesis [113]. Therefore, first conditioning MSCs towards a chondrocyte-like phenotype may be helpful for IVD tissue engineering, so as to enhance MSC chondrogenesis or ‘discogenesis’ when exposed to dynamic loading [29].

MSC differentiation influenced by frequency and duration of the loading

Compressive loading

Chondrogenesis of MSCs induced by dynamic compressive loading and hydrostatic pressure is frequency and duration dependent. A compressive loading frequency of 0.15–1 Hz was shown to enhance MSC chondrogenesis, whereas frequencies of 0.03 or 0.1 Hz did not [22, 90]. The duration of the dynamic compression is also important. Loading on alternating days resulted in negligible chondrogenesis, compared with a daily loading regime [54]. A duration of at least 54 min/day compression increased chondrogenesis but not if the duration was only 12 min/day [22]. As for the magnitude, all the studies were performed within the range of 5–20% compressive strain, and the effect of strain magnitude was not compared (Table 4).

Hydrostatic pressure

The effect of different magnitudes of IHP (0.1, 1, 10 MPa) was analysed and it was found that GAG production by ovine MSCs was increased after 10 days of loading of 1 or 10 MPa as compared to unloaded controls [79]. An IHP exposure duration of 2 h/day instead of 30 min/day enhanced GAG and hydroxyproline production of murine embryonic fibroblasts [21]. Angele et al. [3] also suggested that the effect of IHP is cumulative, 1 day or multiple days of loading give different differentiation results with human MSC. Loading with 10 MPa IHP increased hydroxyproline accumulation after 3–14 days but GAG was increased only at 7 and 14 days [79].

In summary, the combination of growth factors and dynamic loading provides a synergistic effect on MSCs differentiating into matrix producing cells. Consecutive compressive strain of 5–20% at frequencies of 0.15–1 Hz for 1–12 h/day or hydrostatic pressure of 0.1–10 MPa at frequencies 0.25–1 Hz increases the production of GAG and/or hydroxyproline by MSCs and may induce MSC chondrogenesis.

Possibilities and limitations

It seems obvious that well-designed dynamic compression and/or hydrostatic pressure loading protocols can induce differentiation of MSCs towards matrix producing cells. The loading parameters summarised in the first and the second part of this article can be useful for designing a mechanical loading protocol to test the performance of the IVD tissue engineering construct and to direct differentiation of stem cells to matrix producing cells. Nevertheless, there is no study available at present that evaluates the differentiation of MSC towards IVD-like phenotype in the presence of dynamic loading. Due to the lack of specific markers for IVD cells, earlier studies indicated differentiation of MSCs towards IVD-like or chondrocyte-like cells by the expression of the most prominent chondrocytic markers for the extracellular matrix, such as aggrecan and collagen 2 [101]. Recent studies have shown that there are significant differences between chondrocytes, AF and NP cells [29, 30, 32, 78, 102, 103], and the effect of cyclic loading on MSC differentiation towards an IVD cell lineage is worth investigating with these possible IVD markers. On the other hand, although many studies have shown that dynamic loading promotes MSC chondrogenesis, most of the results were based on temporary loading on MSCs from a few minutes up to 12 h/day. The fate of stem cells during continuous diurnal dynamic loading, as in the IVD, is not known. Moreover, the physiological range of deformation of chondrocytes and their organelles may be different than that of IVD cells; therefore, the strain threshold may be different for chondrogenesis or IVD-like differentiation. It is also possible that, other than TGF-β, other growth factors such as growth and differentiation factor 5 (GDF-5), insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) could direct MSCs to a more IVD-like phenotype under dynamic loading.

Conclusions

Dynamic compression is one of the important factors that determines the biosynthetic activity of IVD and MSCs and affects the fate of cells for tissue engineering applications. Magnitude, frequency and duration of dynamic loading together determine the fate of disc cells as well as cells for IVD tissue engineering. It is essential to establish a beneficial loading regime, which enhances the anabolic response of disc cells and the IVD-like differentiation of stem cells. Particularly when more in vitro disc culture systems are made available for testing the performance of tissue engineering constructs for disc degeneration therapy. Therefore, this review summarises information from the literature and suggests possible beneficial loading regimes for IVD cells and MSCs. Nevertheless, the loading applied on the IVD is more complex than only compression and hydrostatic pressure, other physical factors and different modes of mechanical loading also affect disc cell behaviour. With the recent findings on the difference in transcriptional markers of the IVD cells and articular chondrocytes, the fate of the stem cells within the IVD environment could be investigated in depth. Moreover, although the response of the IVD to loading has been well studied, the specific mechanism that controls the IVD cells’ response to applied loads is still not known. The investigation of loading on the IVD will ultimately improve our understanding of the possible prognoses of disc degeneration and provide insight into the prevention of disc diseases and the rehabilitation of the disc after biological therapy. Furthermore, information on the influence of continuous dynamic loading on the possible cell source for tissue engineering, e.g. stem cells and the differentiation of the stem cells, towards an IVD cells phenotype could advance IVD tissue engineering.

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1853-z

References

  • 1.Adams MA, Dolan P, Hutton WC, Porter RW. Diurnal changes in spinal mechanics and their clinical significance. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(2):266–270. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B2.2138156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adams MA, Roughley PJ. What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2006;31(18):2151–2161. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000231761.73859.2c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Angele P, Yoo JU, Smith C, Mansour J, Jepsen KJ, Nerlich M, Johnstone B. Cyclic hydrostatic pressure enhances the chondrogenic phenotype of human mesenchymal progenitor cells differentiated in vitro. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(3):451–457. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ariga K, Yonenobu K, Nakase T, Hosono N, Okuda S, Meng W, Tamura Y, Yoshikawa H. Mechanical stress-induced apoptosis of endplate chondrocytes in organ-cultured mouse intervertebral discs: an ex vivo study. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2003;28(14):1528–1533. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baer AE, Laursen TA, Guilak F, Setton LA. The micromechanical environment of intervertebral disc cells determined by a finite deformation, anisotropic, and biphasic finite element model. J Biomech Eng. 2003;125(1):1–11. doi: 10.1115/1.1532790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Battié MC, Videman T, Kaprio J, Gibbons LE, Gill K, Manninen H, Saarela J, Peltonen L. The Twin Spine Study: contributions to a changing view of disc degeneration. Spine J. 2009;9(1):47–59. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baumgartner L, Arnhold S, Brixius K, Addicks K, Bloch W. Human mesenchymal stem cells: influence of oxygen pressure on proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation in fibrin glue in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93(3):930–940. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Benallaoua M, Richette P, François M, Tsagris L, Revel M, Corvol M, Poiraudeau S, Savouret JF, Rannou F. Modulation of proteoglycan production by cyclic tensile stretch in intervertebral disc cells through a post-translational mechanism. Biorheology. 2006;43(3-4):303–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Benneker LM, Heini PF, Alini M, Anderson SE, Ito K (2005) 2004 young investigator award winner: vertebral endplate marrow contact channel occlusions and intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 30(2):167–173. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000150833.93248.09 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Bongers PM, Hulshof CT, Dijkstra L, Boshuizen HC, Groenhout HJ, Valken E. Back pain and exposure to whole body vibration in helicopter pilots. Ergonomics. 1990;33(8):1007–1026. doi: 10.1080/00140139008925309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bowman CL, Lohr JW. Mechanotransducing ion channels in C6 glioma cells. Glia. 1996;18(3):161–176. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199611)18:3<161::AID-GLIA1>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Boyd LM, Richardson WJ, Chen J, Kraus VB, Tewari A, Setton LA. Osmolarity regulates gene expression in intervertebral disc cells determined by gene array and real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33(8):1071–1077. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-5775-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brisby H, Wei AQ, Molloy T, Chung SA, Murrell GA, Diwan AD. The effect of running exercise on intervertebral disc extracellular matrix production in a rat model. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2010;35(15):1429–1436. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e0f5bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Campbell JJ, Lee DA, Bader DL. Dynamic compressive strain influences chondrogenic gene expression in human mesenchymal stem cells. Biorheology. 2006;43(3–4):455–470. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res. 1991;9(5):641–650. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100090504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carter DR, Blenman PR, Beaupré GS. Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing. J Orthop Res. 1988;6(5):736–748. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100060517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chan SCW, Gantenbein-Ritter B, Leung VY, Chan D, Cheung KM, Ito K. Cryopreserved intervertebral disc with injected bone marrow-derived stromal cells: a feasibility study using organ culture. Spine J. 2010;10(6):486–496. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen J, Baer AE, Paik PY, Yan W, Setton LA. Matrix protein gene expression in intervertebral disc cells subjected to altered osmolarity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;293(3):932–938. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00314-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ching CT, Chow DH, Yao FY, Holmes AD. Changes in nuclear composition following cyclic compression of the intervertebral disc in an in vivo rat-tail model. Med Eng Phys. 2004;26(7):587–594. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Crevensten G, Walsh AJ, Ananthakrishnan D, Page P, Wahba GM, Lotz JC, Berven S. Intervertebral disc cell therapy for regeneration: mesenchymal stem cell implantation in rat intervertebral discs. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32(3):430–434. doi: 10.1023/b:abme.0000017545.84833.7c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Elder SH, Fulzele KS, McCulley WR. Cyclic hydrostatic compression stimulates chondroinduction of C3H/10T1/2 cells. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2005;3(3):141–146. doi: 10.1007/s10237-004-0058-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elder SH, Goldstein SA, Kimura JH, Soslowsky LJ, Spengler DM. Chondrocyte differentiation is modulated by frequency and duration of cyclic compressive loading. Ann Biomed Eng. 2001;29(6):476–482. doi: 10.1114/1.1376696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Elder SH, Kimura JH, Soslowsky LJ, Lavagnino M, Goldstein SA. Effect of compressive loading on chondrocyte differentiation in agarose cultures of chick limb-bud cells. J Orthop Res. 2000;18(1):78–86. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100180112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ferguson SJ, Ito K, Nolte LP. Fluid flow and convective transport of solutes within the intervertebral disc. J Biomech. 2004;37(2):213–221. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00250-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Finger AR, Sargent CY, Dulaney KO, Bernacki SH, Loboa EG. Differential effects on messenger ribonucleic acid expression by bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells seeded in agarose constructs due to ramped and steady applications of cyclic hydrostatic pressure. Tissue Eng. 2007;13(6):1151–1158. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.0290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Freeman PM, Natarajan RN, Kimura JH, Andriacchi TP. Chondrocyte cells respond mechanically to compressive loads. J Orthop Res. 1994;12(3):311–320. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100120303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gajghate S, Hiyama A, Shah M, Sakai D, Anderson DG, Shapiro IM, Risbud MV. Osmolarity and intracellular calcium regulate aquaporin2 expression through TonEBP in nucleus pulposus cells of the intervertebral disc. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(6):992–1001. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.090103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gantenbein B, Grünhagen T, Lee CR, Donkelaar CC, Alini M, Ito K. An in vitro organ culturing system for intervertebral disc explants with vertebral endplates: a feasibility study with ovine caudal discs. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2006;31(23):2665–2673. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244620.15386.df. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gantenbein-Ritter B, Benneker LM, Alini M, Grad S (2011) Differential response of human bone marrow stromal cells to either TGF-β (1) or rhGDF-5. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1619-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Gilson A, Dreger M, Urban JP. Differential expression levels of cytokeratin 8 in cells of the bovine nucleus pulposus complicates the search for specific intervertebral disc cell markers. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(1):R24. doi: 10.1186/ar2931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gokorsch S, Nehring D, Grottke C, Czermak P. Hydrodynamic stimulation and long term cultivation of nucleus pulposus cells: a new bioreactor system to induce extracellular matrix synthesis by nucleus pulposus cells dependent on intermittent hydrostatic pressure. Int J Artif Organs. 2004;27(11):962–970. doi: 10.1177/039139880402701109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grad S, Rutges J, Creemers LB, Büttner A, Milz S, Alini M (2011) Differential gene expression of human nucleus pulposus cells and articular chondrocytes: what defines the intervertebral disc cell phenotype? In: Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the ORS, 13–16 January, Long Beach, CA
  • 33.Guilak F, Ratcliffe A, Mow VC. Chondrocyte deformation and local tissue strain in articular cartilage: a confocal microscopy study. J Orthop Res. 1995;13(3):410–421. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100130315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Bogduk N, Zindrick MR. The pathophysiology of disc degeneration: a critical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(10):1261–1270. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B10.20910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hall AC. Volume-sensitive taurine transport in bovine articular chondrocytes. J Physiol. 1995;484(Pt 3):755–766. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Handa T, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, Osada R, Tsuji H, Obata K. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 1997;22(10):1085–1091. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199705150-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Haschtmann D, Stoyanov JV, Ferguson SJ. Influence of diurnal hyperosmotic loading on the metabolism and matrix gene expression of a whole-organ intervertebral disc model. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(10):1957–1966. doi: 10.1002/jor.20243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Holzwarth C, Vaegler M, Gieseke F, Pfister SM, Handgretinger R, Kerst G, Muller I. Low physiologic oxygen tensions reduce proliferation and differentiation of human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. BMC Cell Biol. 2010;11(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-11-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Huang CY, Gu WY. Effects of mechanical compression on metabolism and distribution of oxygen and lactate in intervertebral disc. J Biomech. 2008;41(6):1184–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Huang CY, Hagar KL, Frost LE, Sun Y, Cheung HS. Effects of cyclic compressive loading on chondrogenesis of rabbit bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2004;22(3):313–323. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-3-313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Huang CY, Reuben PM, Cheung HS. Temporal expression patterns and corresponding protein inductions of early responsive genes in rabbit bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells under cyclic compressive loading. Stem Cells. 2005;23(8):1113–1121. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hutton WC, Elmer WA, Boden SD, Hyon S, Toribatake Y, Tomita K, Hair GA. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on intervertebral disc metabolism. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 1999;24(15):1507–1515. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199908010-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hutton WC, Elmer WA, Bryce LM, Kozlowska EE, Boden SD, Kozlowski M. Do the intervertebral disc cells respond to different levels of hydrostatic pressure? Clin Biomech. 2001;16(9):728–734. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00080-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Huwkins DWL. Disc structure and function. In: Ghosh P, editor. The biology of the intervertebral disc. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Illien-Jünger S, Gantenbein-Ritter B, Grad S, Lezuo P, Ferguson SJ, Alini M, Ito K. The combined effects of limited nutrition and high-frequency loading on intervertebral discs with endplates. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2010;35(19):1744–1752. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c48019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ishihara H, McNally DS, Urban JP, Hall AC. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis in different regions of the intervertebral disk. J Appl Physiol. 1996;80(3):839–846. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.3.839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Janmey PA. The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: component localization and mechanical coupling. Physiol Rev. 1998;78(3):763–781. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.3.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jung Y, Kim SH, Kim YH, Kim SH. The effects of dynamic and three-dimensional environments on chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. Biomed Mater. 2009;4(5):055009. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/4/5/055009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kasra M, Goel V, Martin J, Wang ST, Choi W, Buckwalter J. Effect of dynamic hydrostatic pressure on rabbit intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(4):597–603. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kasra M, Merryman WD, Loveless KN, Goel VK, Martin JD, Buckwalter JA. Frequency response of pig intervertebral disc cells subjected to dynamic hydrostatic pressure. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(10):1967–1973. doi: 10.1002/jor.20253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Katz MM, Hargens AR, Garfin SR (1986) Intervertebral disc nutrition. Diffusion versus convection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 210:243–245 [PubMed]
  • 52.Kelly DJ, Jacobs CR. The role of mechanical signals in regulating chondrogenesis and osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2010;90(1):75–85. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.20173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kim DH, Kim SH, Heo SJ, Shin JW, Lee SW, Park SA, Shin JW. Enhanced differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into NP-like cells via 3D co-culturing with mechanical stimulation. J Biosci Bioeng. 2009;108(1):63–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kisiday JD, Frisbie DD, McIlwraith CW, Grodzinsky AJ. Dynamic compression stimulates proteoglycan synthesis by mesenchymal stem cells in the absence of chondrogenic cytokines. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(10):2817–2824. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Knight MM, Bravenboer JVB, Lee DA, Osch GJVMV, Weinans H, Bader DL. Cell and nucleus deformation in compressed chondrocyte-alginate constructs: temporal changes and calculation of cell modulus. BBA Gen Subj. 2002;1570(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4165(02)00144-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Korecki CL, Kuo CK, Tuan RS, Iatridis JC. Intervertebral disc cell response to dynamic compression is age and frequency dependent. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(6):800–806. doi: 10.1002/jor.20814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Korecki CL, MacLean JJ, Iatridis JC. Characterization of an in vitro intervertebral disc organ culture system. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(7):1029–1037. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0327-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Korecki CL, MacLean JJ, Iatridis JC. Dynamic compression effects on intervertebral disc mechanics and biology. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2008;33(13):1403–1409. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318175cae7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Korecki CL, Taboas JM, Tuan RS, Iatridis JC. Notochordal cell conditioned medium stimulates mesenchymal stem cell differentiation toward a young nucleus pulposus phenotype. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2010;1(2):18. doi: 10.1186/scrt18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kraemer J. Dynamic characteristics of the vertebral column, effects of prolonged loading. Ergonomics. 1985;28(1):95–97. doi: 10.1080/00140138508963117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lee CR, Iatridis JC, Poveda L, Alini M. In vitro organ culture of the bovine intervertebral disc: effects of vertebral endplate and potential for mechanobiology studies. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2006;31(5):515–522. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201302.59050.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lee DA, Knight MM, Bolton JF, Idowu BD, Kayser MV, Bader DL. Chondrocyte deformation within compressed agarose constructs at the cellular and sub-cellular levels. J Biomech. 2000;33(1):81–95. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00160-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Le Maitre CL, Frain J, Fotheringham AP, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA. Human cells derived from degenerate intervertebral discs respond differently to those derived from non-degenerate intervertebral discs following application of dynamic hydrostatic pressure. Biorheology. 2008;45(5):563–575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Le Maitre CL, Frain J, Millward-Sadler J, Fotheringham AP, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA. Altered integrin mechanotransduction in human nucleus pulposus cells derived from degenerated discs. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(2):460–469. doi: 10.1002/art.24248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Liu GZ, Ishihara H, Osada R, Kimura T, Tsuji H. Nitric oxide mediates the change of proteoglycan synthesis in the human lumbar intervertebral disc in response to hydrostatic pressure. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2001;26(2):134–141. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200101150-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Li Z, Kupcsik L, Yao SJ, Alini M, Stoddart MJ. Chondrogenesis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in fibrin–polyurethane composites. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(7):1729–1737. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lotz JC, Chin JR. Intervertebral disc cell death is dependent on the magnitude and duration of spinal loading. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2000;25(12):1477–1483. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200006150-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lotz JC, Colliou OK, Chin JR, Duncan NA, Liebenberg E. Compression-induced degeneration of the intervertebral disc: an in vivo mouse model and finite-element study. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 1998;23(23):2493–2506. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199812010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Luo ZJ, Seedhom BB. Light and low-frequency pulsatile hydrostatic pressure enhances extracellular matrix formation by bone marrow mesenchymal cells: an in vitro study with special reference to cartilage repair. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007;221(5):499–507. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.MacLean JJ, Lee CR, Alini M, Iatridis JC. Anabolic and catabolic mRNA levels of the intervertebral disc vary with the magnitude and frequency of in vivo dynamic compression. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(6):1193–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.MacLean JJ, Lee CR, Alini M, Iatridis JC. The effects of short-term load duration on anabolic and catabolic gene expression in the rat tail intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(5):1120–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.MacLean JJ, Lee CR, Grad S, Ito K, Alini M, Iatridis JC. Effects of immobilization and dynamic compression on intervertebral disc cell gene expression in vivo. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2003;28(10):973–981. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000061985.15849.A9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Malko JA, Hutton WC, Fajman WA. An in vivo MRI study of the changes in volume (and fluid content) of the lumbar intervertebral disc after overnight bed rest and during an 8-hour walking protocol. J Spinal Disord. 2002;15(2):157–163. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200204000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Markway BD, Tan GK, Brooke G, Hudson JE, Cooper-White JJ, Doran MR. Enhanced chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in low oxygen environment micropellet cultures. Cell Transplant. 2010;19(1):29–42. doi: 10.3727/096368909X478560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Masuoka K, Michalek AJ, MacLean JJ, Stokes IA, Iatridis JC. Different effects of static versus cyclic compressive loading on rat intervertebral disc height and water loss in vitro. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2007;32(18):1974–1979. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133d591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.McMillan DW, Garbutt G, Adams MA. Effect of sustained loading on the water content of intervertebral discs: implications for disc metabolism. Ann Rheum Dis. 1996;55(12):880–887. doi: 10.1136/ard.55.12.880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Meyer EG, Buckley CT, Thorpe SD, Kelly DJ (2010) Low oxygen tension is a more potent promoter of chondrogenic differentiation than dynamic compression. J Biomech. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.05.020 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 78.Minogue BM, Richardson SM, Zeef LA, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA. Transcriptional profiling of bovine intervertebral disc cells: implications for identification of normal and degenerate human intervertebral disc cell phenotypes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(1):R22. doi: 10.1186/ar2929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Miyanishi K, Trindade MC, Lindsey DP, Beaupré GS, Carter DR, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Smith RL. Dose- and time-dependent effects of cyclic hydrostatic pressure on transforming growth factor-beta3-induced chondrogenesis by adult human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(8):2253–2262. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.2253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Miyanishi K, Trindade MC, Lindsey DP, Beaupré GS, Carter DR, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Smith RL. Effects of hydrostatic pressure and transforming growth factor-beta 3 on adult human mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis in vitro. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(6):1419–1428. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mobasheri A, Carter SD, Martín-Vasallo P, Shakibaei M. Integrins and stretch activated ion channels; putative components of functional cell surface mechanoreceptors in articular chondrocytes. Cell Biol Int. 2002;26(1):1–18. doi: 10.1006/cbir.2001.0826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mokhbi Soukane D, Shirazi-Adl A, Urban JP. Investigation of solute concentrations in a 3D model of intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(2):254–262. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0822-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mouw JK, Connelly JT, Wilson CG, Michael KE, Levenston ME. Dynamic compression regulates the expression and synthesis of chondrocyte-specific matrix molecules in bone marrow stromal cells. Stem Cells. 2007;25(3):655–663. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Neidlinger-Wilke C, Liedert A, Wuertz K, Buser Z, Rinkler C, Käfer W, Ignatius A, Claes L, Roberts S, Johnson WE. Mechanical stimulation alters pleiotrophin and aggrecan expression by human intervertebral disc cells and influences their capacity to stimulate endothelial migration. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2009;34(7):663–669. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318194e20c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Neidlinger-Wilke C, Wurtz K, Liedert A, Schmidt C, Borm W, Ignatius A, Wilke HJ, Claes L. A three-dimensional collagen matrix as a suitable culture system for the comparison of cyclic strain and hydrostatic pressure effects on intervertebral disc cells. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2(4):457–465. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.4.0457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Neidlinger-Wilke C, Würtz K, Urban JP, Börm W, Arand M, Ignatius A, Wilke HJ, Claes LE. Regulation of gene expression in intervertebral disc cells by low and high hydrostatic pressure. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 3):S372–S378. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0112-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ogawa R, Mizuno S, Murphy GF, Orgill DP. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on three-dimensional chondroinduction of human adipose-derived stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(10):2937–2945. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ohshima H, Tsuji H, Hirano N, Ishihara H, Katoh Y, Yamada H. Water diffusion pathway, swelling pressure, and biomechanical properties of the intervertebral disc during compression load. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 1989;14(11):1234–1244. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198911000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ohshima H, Urban JP, Bergel DH. Effect of static load on matrix synthesis rates in the intervertebral disc measured in vitro by a new perfusion technique. J Orthop Res. 1995;13(1):22–29. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100130106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pelaez D, Huang CY, Cheung HS. Cyclic compression maintains viability and induces chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells in fibrin gel scaffolds. Stem Cells Dev. 2009;18(1):93–102. doi: 10.1089/scd.2008.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284(5411):143–147. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Pope MH, Magnusson M, Wilder DG. Low back pain and whole body vibration. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:241–248. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199809000-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Potier E, Noailly J, Ito K. Directing bone marrow-derived stromal cell function with mechanics. J Biomech. 2010;43(5):807–817. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Søballe K. ESB Research Award 1996. Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech. 1997;30(6):539–548. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(96)00140-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Race A, Broom ND, Robertson P. Effect of loading rate and hydration on the mechanical properties of the disc. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2000;25(6):662–669. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200003150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Rannou F, Lee TS, Zhou RH, Chin J, Lotz JC, Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Barbet JP, Chevrot A, Shyy JY. Intervertebral disc degeneration: the role of the mitochondrial pathway in annulus fibrosus cell apoptosis induced by overload. Am J Pathol. 2004;164(3):915–924. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63179-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rannou F, Richette P, Benallaoua M, François M, Genries V, Korwin-Zmijowska C, Revel M, Corvol M, Poiraudeau S. Cyclic tensile stretch modulates proteoglycan production by intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus cells through production of nitrite oxide. J Cell Biochem. 2003;90(1):148–157. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Reza AT, Nicoll SB. Hydrostatic pressure differentially regulates outer and inner annulus fibrosus cell matrix production in 3D scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008;36(2):204–213. doi: 10.1007/s10439-007-9407-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Richardson SM, Walker RV, Parker S, Rhodes NP, Hunt JA, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA. Intervertebral disc cell-mediated mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells. 2006;24(3):707–716. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Rinkler C, Heuer F, Pedro MT, Mauer UM, Ignatius A, Neidlinger-Wilke C. Influence of low glucose supply on the regulation of gene expression by nucleus pulposus cells and their responsiveness to mechanical loading. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13(4):535–542. doi: 10.3171/2010.4.SPINE09713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Risbud MV, Albert TJ, Guttapalli A, Vresilovic EJ, Hillibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Shapiro IM. Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards a nucleus pulposus-like phenotype in vitro: implications for cell-based transplantation therapy. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2004;29(23):2627–2632. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146462.92171.7f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Rutges J, Creemers LB, Dhert W, Milz S, Sakai D, Mochida J, Alini M, Grad S. Variations in gene and protein expression in human nucleus pulposus in comparison with annulus fibrosus and cartilage cells: potential associations with aging and degeneration. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18(3):416–423. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sakai D, Nakai T, Mochida J, Alini M, Grad S. Differential phenotype of intervertebral disc cells: microarray and immunohistochemical analysis of canine nucleus pulposus and anulus fibrosus. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2009;34(14):1448–1456. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a55705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Säämänen AM, Puustjärvi K, Ilves K, Lammi M, Kiviranta I, Jurvelin J, Helminen HJ, Tammi M. Effect of running exercise on proteoglycans and collagen content in the intervertebral disc of young dogs. Int J Sports Med. 1993;14(1):48–51. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Scherer K, Schünke M, Sellckau R, Hassenpflug J, Kurz B. The influence of oxygen and hydrostatic pressure on articular chondrocytes and adherent bone marrow cells in vitro. Biorheology. 2004;41(3–4):323–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Setton LA, Chen J. Cell mechanics and mechanobiology in the intervertebral disc. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2004;29(23):2710–2723. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146050.57722.2a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Setton LA, Chen J. Mechanobiology of the intervertebral disc and relevance to disc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 2):52–57. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sivan S, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Würtz K, Maroudas A, Urban JP. Diurnal fluid expression and activity of intervertebral disc cells. Biorheology. 2006;43(3–4):283–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Soukane DM, Shirazi-Adl A, Urban JP. Computation of coupled diffusion of oxygen, glucose and lactic acid in an intervertebral disc. J Biomech. 2007;40(12):2645–2654. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Stokes IA, Iatridis JC. Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: overload versus immobilization. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2004;29(23):2724–2732. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146049.52152.da. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Szafranski JD, Grodzinsky AJ, Burger E, Gaschen V, Hung H-H, Hunziker EB. Chondrocyte mechanotransduction: effects of compression on deformation of intracellular organelles and relevance to cellular biosynthesis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2004;12(12):937–946. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Terraciano V, Hwang N, Moroni L, Park HB, Zhang Z, Mizrahi J, Seliktar D, Elisseeff J. Differential response of adult and embryonic mesenchymal progenitor cells to mechanical compression in hydrogels. Stem Cells. 2007;25(11):2730–2738. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Thorpe SD, Buckley CT, Vinardell T, O’Brien FJ, Campbell VA, Kelly DJ. Dynamic compression can inhibit chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;377(2):458–462. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Urban JP. The effect of physical factors on disk cell metabolism. In: Buckwalter JA, Goldberg VM, Woo SL, editors. Musculoskeletal soft-tissue aging: impact on mobility. IL: Am Acad Orthop Surg Rosemont; 1993. pp. 391–412. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Urban JP. The role of the physicochemical environment in determining disc cell behaviour. Biochem Soc Trans. 2002;30(Pt 6):858–864. doi: 10.1042/bst0300858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Urban JP, Hall AC, Gehl KA. Regulation of matrix synthesis rates by the ionic and osmotic environment of articular chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol. 1993;154(2):262–270. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041540208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Urban JP, Holm S, Maroudas A, Nachemson A (1982) Nutrition of the intervertebral disc: effect of fluid flow on solute transport. Clin Orthop Relat Res 170:296–302 [PubMed]
  • 118.Urban JP, Maroudas A. Swelling of the intervertebral disc in vitro. Connect Tissue Res. 1981;9:1–10. doi: 10.3109/03008208109160234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Urban JPG, McMullin J, Maroudas A, Holm S. The effect of mechanical stress on fluid and solute transport in the intervertebral disc. Int J Microcirc. 1982;1(3):221. [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Werf M, Lezuo P, Maissen O, Donkelaar CC, Ito K. Inhibition of vertebral endplate perfusion results in decreased intervertebral disc intranuclear diffusive transport. J Anat. 2007;211(6):769–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00816.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wagner DR, Lindsey DP, Li KW, Tummala P, Chandran SE, Smith RL, Longaker MT, Carter DR, Beaupre GS. Hydrostatic pressure enhances chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells in osteochondrogenic medium. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008;36(5):813–820. doi: 10.1007/s10439-008-9448-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Walsh AJ, Lotz JC. Biological response of the intervertebral disc to dynamic loading. J Biomech. 2004;37(3):329–337. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00290-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wang DL, Jiang SD, Dai LY. Biologic response of the intervertebral disc to static and dynamic compression in vitro. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2007;32(23):2521–2528. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158cb61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Wenger KH, Woods JA, Holecek A, Eckstein EC, Robertson JT, Hasty KA. Matrix remodeling expression in anulus cells subjected to increased compressive load. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2005;30(10):1122–1126. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000162395.56424.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.White TL, Malone TR. Effects of running on intervertebral disc height. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990;12(4):139–146. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1990.12.4.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wuertz K, Godburn K, Iatridis JC. MSC response to pH levels found in degenerating intervertebral discs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;379(4):824–829. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Wuertz K, Godburn K, MacLean JJ, Barbir A, Donnelly JS, Roughley PJ, Alini M, Iatridis JC. In vivo remodeling of intervertebral discs in response to short- and long-term dynamic compression. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(9):1235–1242. doi: 10.1002/jor.20867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Wuertz K, Godburn K, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Urban J, Iatridis JC. Behavior of mesenchymal stem cells in the chemical microenvironment of the intervertebral disc. Spine (Philadelphia, PA, 1976) 2008;33(17):1843–1849. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b8f53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Wuertz K, Urban JP, Klasen J, Ignatius A, Wilke HJ, Claes L, Neidlinger-Wilke C. Influence of extracellular osmolarity and mechanical stimulation on gene expression of intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(11):1513–1522. doi: 10.1002/jor.20436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Yao H, Gu WY. Physical signals and solute transport in human intervertebral disc during compressive stress relaxation: 3D finite element analysis. Biorheology. 2006;43(3–4):323–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Zeiter S, Lezuo P, Ito K. Effect of TGF beta1, BMP-2 and hydraulic pressure on chondrogenic differentiation of bovine bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Biorheology. 2009;46(1):45–55. doi: 10.3233/BIR-2009-0520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Spine Journal are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES