Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2011 Nov 4;286(44):le25. doi: 10.1074/jbc.N111.233502

Reply to Hu et al.: Mcl-1 Reduction Due to Caspase-dependent Cleavage during Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-induced Apoptosis

Nobuhiro Morishima ‡,§,1, Keiko Nakanishi , Akihiko Nakano §
PMCID: PMC3207465

This is a response to a letter by Hu et al. (1)

As Hu et al. pointed out (1), caspase-3 could process Mcl-1 during apoptosis, depending on the type of apoptotic stimuli or cell (2, 3). However, we did not detect any Mcl-1 fragments by immunoblotting during apoptosis in myoblast cells after induction by ATF6, WBP1, or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stressors. We thus examined whether active ATF6 could reduce Mcl-1 levels in the absence of caspase activation. These conditions were established by overexpressing Bcl-xL. Again, Mcl-1 was reduced by active ATF6. Our conclusion is consistent with the current consensus that the level of the Mcl-1 protein is principally regulated by the ubiquitin/deubiquitin system. The cleavage of Mcl-1 by caspases during apoptosis may contribute to the feed-forward amplification of apoptotic signals after caspase activation (4). It is likely that, in myoblast cells, the completion of apoptosis does not depend on this feed-forward mechanism. We did not detect up-regulation of Mcl-1, Noxa, or Bim by DNA microarray analysis or quantitative PCR.

A significant point of the study is that the unfolded protein response is linked to the Bcl-2 family during ER stress-induced apoptosis. Because expression of Bcl-2 family members can differ greatly among cell types (e.g. normal versus cancer cells), and complex interactions occur within the Bcl-2 family, Bcl-2 family proteins may respond to ER stress differently in different cell types. This would generate apparent discrepancies among studies. Nevertheless, these discrepancies may provide valuable clues for clinical applications (5).

References

  • 1. Hu J., Dang D., Song T., Vanderkerken K. (2011) J. Biol. Chem. http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/full/286/44/le24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2. Herrant M., Jacquel A., Marchetti S., Belhacène N., Colosetti P., Luciano F., Auberger P. (2004) Oncogene 23, 7863–7873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Podar K., Gouill S. L., Zhang J., Opferman J. T., Zorn E., Tai Y. T., Hideshima T., Amiot M., Chauhan D., Harousseau J. L., Anderson K. C. (2008) Oncogene 27, 721–731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zhong Q., Gao W., Du F., Wang X. (2005) Cell 121, 1085–1095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Schwickart M., Huang X., Lill J. R., Liu J., Ferrando R., French D. M., Maecker H., O'Rourke K., Bazan F., Eastham-Anderson J., Yue P., Dornan D., Huang D. C., Dixit V. M. (2010) Nature 463, 103–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES