Abstract
Purpose
To present data on the high rate of SDHB mutations in patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma whose initial tumor presentation began in childhood or adolescence.
Patients and Methods
From 2000 to 2010, 263 patients with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma were evaluated through the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Of the 263 patients, 125 patients were found to have metastatic disease; of these 125 patients, 32 patients presented with a tumor before 20 years of age. An additional 17 patients presented with a tumor before 20 years of age but demonstrated no development of metastatic disease. Genetic testing for mutations in the VHL, MEN, and SDHB/C/D genes was performed on patients without previously identified genetic mutations.
Results
Of the 32 patients who presented with metastatic disease and had their primary tumor in childhood or adolescence, sequence analysis of germline DNA showed SDHB mutations in 23 patients (71.9%), SDHD mutations in three patients (9.4%), VHL mutations in two patients (6.3%), and an absence of a known mutation in four patients (12.5%). The majority of these 32 patients (78.1%) presented with primary tumors in an extra-adrenal location.
Conclusion
The majority of patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma who presented with a primary tumor in childhood/adolescence had primary extra-adrenal tumors and harbored SDHB mutations. Except for primary tumors located in the head and neck where SDHD genetic testing is advised, we recommend that patients who present with metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma with primary tumor development in childhood or adolescence undergo SDHB genetic testing before they undergo testing for other gene mutations, unless clinical presentation or family history suggests a different mutation.
INTRODUCTION
Pheochromocytomas, which are chromaffin-cell tumors that arise from the adrenal medulla, and paragangliomas, which are chromaffin-cell tumors that arise in extra-adrenal locations, are catecholamine-producing tumors. In approximately one-third of patients, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are associated with mutations in the following nine susceptibility genes: von Hippel-Lindau (VHL); RET in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2); neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1); recently discovered SDHAF21,2 and (5) TMEM1273; and mutations of the A, B, C, and D subunits of the mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) complex.4–7
Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma in the pediatric/adolescent patient is exceedingly rare, with studies that showed only approximately 20% of all cases were pediatric/adolescent.8 The pediatric/adolescent patient appears to present with symptoms similar to those of the adult patient, although with a more frequent occurrence of sustained hypertension on clinical presentation.8 In addition, the pediatric/adolescent population with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma appears to have a higher predominance of males than does the adult population.9 The exact rate of metastatic disease in children is unclear, with metastatic rates between 9% and 47% cited.10,11 The reported prevalence of genetically related pediatric/adolescent pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma is poorly defined, with some studies citing the incidence of familial disease at 22%, and other studies citing the rate in the age group of 10 years and younger as high as 70%.8,12 Furthermore, the rate of metastatic disease as related to the type of genetic mutation remains unknown.
Although numerous studies have described pediatric and adolescent patients with a diagnosis of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma, information on clinical and genetic characteristics of metastatic disease in the pediatric/adolescent population is lacking. We present what is to the best of our knowledge new data in this article that disclosed a high rate of SDHB mutations among patients who developed metastatic disease and who mainly presented with their primary extra-adrenal tumor in childhood or adolescence.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients
This study included 32 patients (25 men and seven women) with histologically documented pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma who presented with their primary tumor before 20 years of age, which was defined as a pediatric or adolescent tumor, and had, or later developed, metastatic disease (defined as pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas in nonchromaffin-containing tissue: ie, lungs, bones, lymph nodes, and liver13). An additional 17 pediatric/adolescent patients did not develop metastatic disease. The patients included came from a larger group of 263 patients with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma who were recorded on the NIH registry (ie, a referral center for patients with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma) between November 2000 and July 2010 (Fig 1). This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, and all patients gave written informed consent before testing.
Fig 1.
Flow chart of study patient population. Statistical analysis that compared percentages of pediatric/adolescent patients in the metastatic versus nonmetastatic groups (26.7% and 12.7%, respectively) showed statistical significance (P = .006) in the metastatic group. Similarly, statistical analysis that compared the rate of SDHB mutations among pediatric/adolescent patients with metastatic disease with the pediatric/adolescent patients without metastatic disease demonstrated statistical significance (P = .002) in the metastatic group. (*) Statistically higher compared with the nonmetastatic tumor group. MEN2, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2; NF1, neurofibromatosis type 1; SDHB, succinate dehydrogenase subunit B; SDHD, succinate dehydrogenase subunit D; Sporadic, no mutation identified; VHL, von Hippel-Lindau.
Genetic Analysis
Of the 49 patients (both with and without metastatic disease) included in the current study, 39 patients were found to have a genetic mutation that was previously recognized as pathogenic in the development of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Of those 39 patients, 19 patients underwent genotyping before evaluation at the NIH, and 18 patients underwent genotyping through evaluation at the NIH; two patients were diagnosed with NF1 on the basis of the clinical presentation. Genetic testing through the NIH involved an assessment for mutations or large deletions in RET, VHL, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD. An investigation was not performed for more recently discovered SDHA, SDHAF2, and TMEM127. Genotyping was performed in collaboration with the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and the Department of Genetics, the European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France.
A mutation in the aforementioned genes was not found in 10 patients. None of these patients had any family or personal history of a syndromic presentation that would suggest the presence of MEN2, VHL, NF1, or a syndrome associated with SDH mutations (SDHx).
Biochemical Testing
On evaluation at the NIH, patients underwent a biochemical assessment for plasma catecholamines, metanephrines, and chromogranin A (Table 1). Methoxytyramine testing was not performed because of the unavailability of the test until 2007. Blood samples were collected by use of a forearm venous line, with patients supine for 20 minutes after catheter insertion before sampling as previously described.
Table 1.
Clinical Characteristics of 32 Pediatric/Adolescent Patients Who Developed Metastatic Disease
| Characteristic | SDHB | SDHD | VHL | No Mutation Identified | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 23 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 32 |
| AOI, years | |||||
| Mean | 10.8* | 16.3 | 7.00 | 14.5 | 11.6 |
| SD | 4.43 | 4.62 | 2.83 | 3.70 | 4.68 |
| Range | 3-18 | 11-19 | 5-9 | 10-18 | 3-19 |
| AOD, years | |||||
| Mean | 12.3* | 16.7 | 7.00 | 15.5 | 12.8 |
| SD | 3.81 | 4.04 | 2.83 | 3.32 | 4.17 |
| Range | 7-18 | 12-19 | 5-9 | 11-18 | 5-19 |
| AOM, years | |||||
| Mean | 19.9* | 31.0 | 18.5 | 28.5 | 21.9 |
| SD | 7.89 | 17.5 | 6.36 | 7.00 | 9.35 |
| Range | 9-40 | 13-48 | 14-23 | 18-32 | 9-48 |
| MI, years | |||||
| Mean | 7.57 | 14.3 | 11.5 | 13.0 | 9.13 |
| SD | 7.62 | 14.0 | 9.19 | 9.13 | 8.45 |
| Range | 0-25 | 1-29 | 5-18 | 0-21 | 0-29 |
| Primary tumor, No. of patients† | |||||
| Retroperitoneal | 19 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 22 |
| Adrenal | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Head and neck | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Biochemistry, No. of patients‡ | |||||
| NE | 17 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 24 |
| EPI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DA | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| No. of patients with data unavailable | 3 | 3 | |||
| NMN | 19 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 24 |
| No. of patients with data unavailable | 1 | ||||
| MN | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| No. of patients with data unavailable | 1 | 1 | |||
| CgA | 14 | 2 | 2 | 18 | |
| No. of patients with data unavailable | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
NOTE: Statistical analysis revealed statistically lower ages at initial symptoms, initial diagnosis, and initial diagnosis of metastatic disease among SDHB-mutation patients with metastatic disease compared with the combination of SDHD-mutation patients with metastatic disease and patients with metastatic disease but with no identifiable mutation (P = .024, P = .031, and .016, respectively).
Abbreviations: AOD, age at initial tumor diagnosis; AOI, age at report of initial tumor-related symptoms; AOM, age at initial diagnosis of metastatic disease; CgA, chromogranin A; DA, dopamine; EPI, epinephrine; MI, metastatic interval (years between initial tumor diagnosis and diagnosis of metastatic disease); MN, metanephrine; NE, norepinephrine; NMN, normetanephrine; SDHB, succinate dehydrogenase subunit B; SDHD, succinate dehydrogenase subunit D; VHL, von Hippel-Lindau.
Statistically lower age compared with SDHD-mutation patients and patients with no identifiable mutation.
Data are presented as the number of patients who presented with a primary tumor in the given location.
Data are presented as the number of patients who presented with increase of the given catecholamine or MN/NMN at diagnosis of metastatic disease. Interfering peaks or unavailability of a test was the reason for missing CgA results in six metastatic patients, missing DA results in three metastatic patients, and missing plasma MN/NMN results in one metastatic patient. Biochemical testing in three metastatic patients was performed outside the National Institutes of Health under recommended testing guidelines.
Statistical Analysis
The following five end points were evaluated: age at initial symptoms, age of initial diagnosis, age at metastatic diagnosis, interval between initial diagnosis and occurrence of metastases (or last follow-up if no metastatic disease), and interval between initial diagnosis and death (or last follow-up if still surviving). For comparisons of ages or intervals in patients who developed metastatic disease, between those with a germline SDHB mutation and those with either an SDHD mutation or no evidence of a known mutation (sporadic), a standard two-sample t test was used. Although these values were survival-type data, none of the patients in these comparisons had censored values and, hence, the t test could be applied. For confirmation, both the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test and the log-rank test for survival data were computed and gave similar results (results not shown). Means and standard deviations are listed in Table 1.
Fisher's exact test was used to compare the proportion of pediatric/adolescent patients between metastatic versus nonmetastatic groups (Fig 1).
For plotting metastases-free survival (ie, the time from initial diagnosis to development of metastases or last follow-up) of all patients included (both patients who developed and did not develop metastases), Kaplan-Meier plots for censored survival data were calculated along with their associated confidence bands; small vertical tic marks on the Kaplan-Meier curves showed the follow-up times for patients who did not develop metastases. All P values were two sided.
RESULTS
Patient Characteristics
Of the 263 patients with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma evaluated through the NIH pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma registry, 49 patients were diagnosed with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma before 20 years of age, and 32 of these patients were known to have developed metastatic disease (Fig 1). The percentage of pediatric and adolescent patients among those with a history of metastases (32 of 120 patients; 26.7%) was found to be significantly higher (P = .006) than the percentage of such patients with no history of metastases (17 of 134 patients; 12.7%). Nine of the 263 patients who presented with symptoms of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma before 20 years of age were not officially diagnosed until adulthood. Although we believe these patients had pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma in childhood/adolescence, they were not analyzed in this study.
The average age of initial symptom onset for these 32 pediatric/adolescent patients who developed metastatic disease was 11.6 ± 4.7 years (range, 3 to 19 years). The average age at the time of initial diagnosis was 12.8 ± 4.2 years (range, 5 to 19 years), whereas the average age at the time metastases were confirmed was 21.9 ± 9.4 years (range: 9 to 48 years). The interval between diagnosis of a primary tumor and of metastatic disease was 9.1 ± 8.5 years (range, 0 to 29 years).
The average age of initial symptom onset for the 17 pediatric/adolescent patients who did not develop metastatic disease was 11.1 ± 4.8 years (range, 3 to 18 years). The average age at the time of initial diagnosis was 12.5 ± 5.1 years (range, 4 to 19 years).
Genetics
Of the 32 patients with metastatic disease studied, 23 patients (71.9%) were found to have germline SDHB mutations; three patients (9.38%) had SDHD mutations; VHL mutations were found in two patients (6.25%); in four patients (12.5%), a mutation could not be found, although in some patients, not all testing was performed (Table 1).
Of the 17 patients without a history of metastatic disease, four patients (23.5%) harbored SDHB mutations, one patient (5.9%) harbored an SDHD mutation, four patients (23.5%) harbored a VHL mutation, and two patients (11.8%) harbored an NF1 mutation. A mutation was not identified in six (35.3%) patients. At the most recent follow-up, none of these patients showed signs of metastatic disease.
Statistical analysis that compared the rate of SDHB mutations in this pediatric/adolescent population showed a significantly higher (P = .002) rate of SDHB mutations in the group with a history of metastatic disease (23 of 32 patients; 71.9%) compared with patients without such a history (four of 17 patients; 23.5%).
Biochemistry
Patients with metastatic disease were tested for plasma catecholamines, metanephrines, and chromogranin A at evaluation of metastatic disease (Table 1). In a high percentage of patients, these data showed increased plasma norepinephrine (75%), normetanephrine (75%), and chromogranin A (69.2%) levels. The percentage of patients with SDHB mutations whose tumors secreted norepinephrine (73.9%), normetanephrine (82.6%), and chromogranin A (70.0%) was comparable with the percentage of patients without an SDHB mutation (77.8%, 62.5%, and 66.7%, respectively).
Tumor Location
Of the 32 patients with metastatic disease studied, 22 patients presented with a primary tumor in the retroperitoneum, seven patients presented with primary adrenal tumors, and three patients presented with primary tumors in the head and/or neck (Table 1). The majority of patients with SDHB mutations (19 of 23 patients; 82.6%) presented with primary tumors in the retroperitoneum. All three patients with SDHD mutations presented with primary tumors in the head and/or neck. The location of the primary tumor in patients without an identifiable mutation was the retroperitoneum in three patients and the adrenal gland in one patient; the two patients with VHL mutations presented with primary tumors in the adrenal gland. Three patients with SDHB mutations were found to have cystic nodules in the thyroid gland, and one patient with an SDHD mutation was reported to have had esophageal leiomyosarcoma.
Metastases were found in the bones (in 87.5% of patients), liver (in 21.9% of patients), lungs (of 25% of patients), and lymph nodes (in 46.9% of patients), and some patients had more than one site of metastases. The majority of patients presented with metastatic lesions to bones, and all patients with metastatic disease whose tumors harbored either SDHB or SDHD mutations presented with at least one metastatic lesion to the bones. A total of 96.9% of patients had metastatic lesions in either bones or lymph nodes, and only one of the 32 patients presented with no metastatic lesions in these locations.
Outcomes
A comparison of patients with an SDHB mutation (23 patients) with the combined group of patients with metastatic disease with the SDHD mutation (three patients) and patients without an identified mutation (four patients), we found that ages of initial symptom onset, initial diagnosis of disease, and initial diagnosis of metastatic disease for patients with SDHB mutations were significantly lower (P = .024, P = .031, and P = .016, respectively). The interval between initial diagnosis and detection of metastases was not significantly different between groups, although patients with metastatic disease with an SDHB mutation tended to have a shorter interval (P = .10; Table 1).
All five deceased patients harbored SDHB mutations and had metastatic disease. These patients survived an average of 6.4 ± 7.6 years after the initial diagnosis of metastatic disease (2, 3, 3, 4, and 20 years) and an average of 18.0 ± 9.62 years after the initial diagnosis of disease. The remaining 27 patients with metastatic disease have been followed an average of 6.7 ± 7.0 years after the initial diagnosis of metastatic disease and an average of 15.4 ± 12.1 years after the initial diagnosis of disease. The 17 patients without metastatic disease have survived an average of 4.82 ± 8.17 years after the initial diagnosis of disease.
Among all 49 patients, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 5-year survival rate was 97.6% (95% CI, 84.3% to 99.7%), of the 10-year survival rate was 97.6% (no deaths occurred between 5 and 10 years), and of the 20-year survival rate was 83.7% (95% CI: 54.5% to 94.9%). Among the group of patients with SDHB mutations, the 5-, 10-, and 20-year survival rates were 95.8%, 95.8%, and 71.9%, respectively. Among the 22 patients with non-SDHB mutations, survival estimates were all 100%.
The time to the development of metastatic disease after initial diagnosis (ie, metastases-free survival) is shown in Figure 2 along with its 95% confidence band. A comparison of metastases-free survival between SDHB patients and non-SDHB patients is shown in Figure 3.
Fig 2.
Kaplan-Meier survival curve and 95% confidence band: Metastases-free survival for all patients (N = 49). The two main characteristics of this estimated survival curve were (1) an early set of failures within 2 years (the 2-year estimate was 79.2%, which indicated that approximately 20% of patients would develop metastatic disease within 2 years of diagnosis) and (2) a slow but steady decrease in the curve from 2 to 30 years, with a 30-year estimate of 4.5%. Small tic marks indicate follow-up times for patients who did not develop metastases.
Fig 3.
Comparison of metastases-free survival between succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) patients (n = 27) and non-SDHB patients (n = 22). Although both groups showed an early set of failures (within 2 years) followed by a steady stream of patients who developed metastases over the next two to three decades, SDHB patients fared substantially worse (P = .005). Small tic marks indicate follow-up times for patients who did not develop metastases.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we found that patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma who presented with tumors in childhood or adolescence were at high risk for harboring an SDHB mutation. In addition, these patients far more frequently presented with sympathetic paraganglioma than with pheochromocytoma. Specifically, of 32 pediatric/adolescent patients, 23 patients (71.9%) were found to have SDHB mutations, and all three patients (9.4%) with metastatic head and neck paragangliomas harbored SDHD mutations.
Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas in childhood and adolescence are rare, and although recent reviews14 have described this disease in the pediatric/adolescent population, much knowledge is lacking. As reported in the literature, in the majority (56%) of pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas in patients under the age of 18 years, a germline mutation (reported only in the VHL, SDHD, and SDHB) could be identified, which was a much higher percentage than in the adult population.12 The available data for pediatric/adolescent pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas also suggested that the rate of malignancy was as high as 12%, but the reported cohort had few patients with only paragangliomas and had no mutation analysis.8 In our adult patient cohort, metastatic disease was previously seen in 24% to 48% of SDHB-related pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma cases.16,17 In this study, of 27 pediatric/adolescent patients with SDHB mutations, 23 patients (85.2%) developed metastatic disease. As noted, of 32 pediatric/adolescent patients who developed metastatic disease, 23 patients (71.9%) were found to harbor an SDHB mutation. Furthermore, all five deceased patients had SDHB mutations, and all of these patients had at least a 10-fold increase in one of the measured plasma catecholamines or metanephrines. Thus, our data demonstrated a rate of development of metastatic disease that was much higher than previously thought, with SDHB mutations as the most significant risk factor for the development of metastatic disease in this population.
With an additional analysis of patients with metastatic disease (32 patients) presented in this study, we found that the age of symptom onset, age of initial diagnosis, and age of initial diagnosis of metastatic disease were significantly lower in metastatic patients with SDHB-related tumors compared with patients with SDHD-related tumors or with pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas in which a germline mutation could not be identified. Not only is the presence of an SDHB mutation in pediatric/adolescent patients with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma a risk factor for the development of metastatic disease, but it may also indicate a risk for the development of disease at an extra-adrenal location and at an early age compared with other patients. However, the age of onset did not differ much between patients with SDHB mutations who developed metastatic disease and patients who did not developed metastatic disease, which indicated that the early age of onset alone may not increase the risk of metastatic development.
Previously published data demonstrated a difference in the expression of hypoxia inhibitory factor expression and activation of the Warburg effect among different genetic phenotypes.18,19 Specifically, data suggested a higher degree of (pseudo)hypoxia and hypoxia inhibitory factor 2α expression in patients with SDHB mutations compared with other pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. The higher degree of (pseudo)hypoxia may have been associated with a greater activation of angiogenesis and tumor-cell growth.18 These results may explain the lack of pediatric/adolescent RET and NF1 patients who developed metastatic disease in the recent cohort and, in turn, the low percentage of patients with germline mutations in either VHL or MEN2 compared with SDHx patients. It is not known whether a younger age at initial diagnosis and subsequent development of metastatic disease are additional consequences of abnormal immune function, differences in microenvironment, resistance to apoptosis, or the degree of mitochondrial dysfunction in children/adolescents compared with adults. Nevertheless, some data are available that compared pediatric and adult experimental animals. For example, different tumor characteristics in gliomas between pediatric and adult rats, especially in regard to tumor invasiveness and growth patterns, have been demonstrated.20 Therefore, the possibility of tumor differences between our adult and pediatric/adolescent populations was plausible. Additional studies may clarify these apparent differences.
Among our cohort, we found that the majority of patients with metastatic disease presented with a noradrenergic phenotype. SDHB-related metastatic pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas, in particular, were likely (in 91.3% of patients with metastatic disease) to present with increases in norepinephrine or normetanephrine, consistent with previous reports.16 This study also demonstrated increases of norepinephrine and dopamine in 21.7% of SDHB and 33.3% of SDHD patients with metastatic disease as reported previously.17,21–23 As a result of the unavailability of the test for most patients, methoxytyramine analysis was not performed, but the presence of increased dopamine emphasized the need for testing plasma methoxytyramine in patients with germline SDHx mutations.21,24 Although silent (catecholamines and metanephrines within normal limits) or solely dopaminergic biochemical phenotypes are gaining importance for SDHx-related pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma, in this study, we found that almost all patients who developed metastatic disease presented with increased catecholamine/metanephrine levels.
The majority of patients (23 of 27 patients; 85.2%), both with and without metastatic disease, with germline SDHB mutations presented with primary tumors in the retroperitoneum, which was consistent with previous reports17,25; all patients with germline SDHD mutations had primary tumors in the head and neck. The present data further supported previous studies that SDHB mutations were often associated with extra-adrenal tumor location, and these two risk factors were highly associated with metastatic disease in children.
Despite the fact that the NIH Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma Research Program represents a tertiary center-level program, it was not designed as, and does not function as, a hereditary disease-oriented program but, rather, as an all-inclusive clinical program for advanced diagnostic assessment and clinical management of these patients. Although the likelihood of referral bias toward more complicated familial cases was recognized, it is noteworthy that in our pediatric/adolescent cohort, 48.6% of patients (18 of 37 patients) were unaware of their genetic status at the time of the NIH evaluation. Of the 31 patients who presented with SDHx-related pediatric/adolescent disease, 17 patients (54.8%) had no knowledge of a genetic mutation on initial evaluation at the NIH.
Recent discoveries and advances in studies of pathophysiology, genetics, and biochemistry of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma have dramatically changed approaches to this disease, with an emphasis on tailoring clinical care to specific genetic backgrounds. For example, the recently described imaging flip-flop phenomenon has revolutionized the localization of metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma lesions in patients with germline SDHB mutations26; and prophylactic thyroidectomy is now recommended for pediatric/adolescent patients with certain mutations to the RET proto-oncogene.27,28 Despite these recent discoveries, we are unable to reliably predict the outcome in any given patient. In this study, we began the process of understanding the natural history and can say that a child/adolescent who harbors a germline mutation in an SDHx subunit who develops a primary pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma in an extra-adrenal location has a high likelihood of developing metastatic disease. Because development of metastatic disease can occur during the transition from childhood to adulthood and pediatric to adult care, there is a need for diligent follow-up and counseling by pediatric care providers and a proper transition into adult care. Although we agree with the clinical standard to genetically test all patients with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma, we recommend that all patients who present with metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and a history of the development of a primary extra-adrenal or head and neck tumor in childhood/adolescence be initially tested for mutations in the SDHB or SDHD genes, respectively. Finally, these patients may also be considered for screening for GI stromal tumors (GISTs, Carney-Stratakis syndrome).29
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge the expert assistance of Karen T. Adams, CRNP, MSc, and Thanh-Truc Hyunh, BS, in the production of this article.
Appendix
Methods
Genetics.
Of the 10 patients without an identifiable mutation, eight patients were tested for SDHB/C/D point mutations and gross deletions but not RET and VHL; 1 patient was tested for SDHB/D point mutations, SDHB gross deletions, RET, and VHL but not for SDHC point mutations and SDHC/D gross deletions; one patient was tested for all aforementioned genes.
Biochemistry.
Biochemical data for patients without metastatic disease was taken from the initial presentation of patients with a tumor before surgical removal whether at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (10 patients) or outside the NIH (seven patients). Chromogranin A measurements were not available for all patients whose biochemistry was performed at an outside facility (seven patients) and one patient whose biochemistry was performed at the NIH (Appendix Table A1, online only).
Results
Biochemistry.
Patients with no evidence of metastatic disease (17 patients) were tested for plasma catecholamines and metanephrines before surgical tumor removal. Data showed increased plasma norepinephrine in 70.6% of patients and increased plasma normetanephrine in 70.6% of patients. Increased plasma chromogranin A was observed in eight of the nine patients tested. Two patients with germline SDHB mutations presented with biochemical silence (no increase in plasma catecholamines, metanephrines, or chromogranin A), whereas the other two patients with germline SDHB mutations presented with increased norepinephrine, normetanephrine, and chromogranin A (one patient also presented with increased dopamine levels). A large proportion of patients (76.9%) without a germline SDHB mutation presented with increased normetanephrine levels.
Tumor location.
Of the 17 patients without metastatic disease, nine patients presented with primary adrenal tumors, seven patients presented with primary retroperitoneal tumors, and one patient presented with a primary head and neck tumor (Appendix Table A1).
Outcomes.
Ages of initial symptom onset, initial diagnosis, and initial diagnosis of metastatic disease and the metastatic interval in patients with SDHB-related metastatic disease as compared with patients with SDHD-related and sporadic metastatic disease were analyzed. In contrast to these results, the same analyses of ages of initial symptom onset and initial diagnosis of disease in the group of 17 patients without metastatic disease showed no differences between patients with SDHB mutations and those with either SDHD mutations or no identified mutation (differences in mean ages for these two end points were 1.3 and 1.0 years, respectively, with corresponding P values of .60 and .72).
Point estimates and associated 95% CIs for non-SDHB and SDHB patients at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years clearly demonstrated differences in metastases-free survival, which were approximately 30% to 50% at these time points. At these time points, the non-SDHB patient estimates were 82% (95% CI, 51% to 94%), 82% (95% CI, 51% to 94%: same as for 5 years because no metastases occurred between 5 and 10 years), 61% (95% CI, 28% to 83%), and 41% (95% CI, 13% to 68%), respectively. For SDHB patients, the comparable values were 52% (95% CI, 30% to 69%), 28% (95% CI, 12% to 47%), 19% (95% CI, 6% to 37%), and 9% (95% CI, 2% to 26%). Alternatively, the median metastases-free survival by mutation groups could be estimated, which summarized the survival experience in a single number; for non-SDHB patients, the median was 18 years (95% CI, 13 to 29 years), whereas for SDHB patients, it was only half as long (median, 9 years; 95% CI, 5 to 15 years).
Table A1.
Clinical Characteristics of 17 Pediatric/Adolescent Patients Who Did Not Develop Metastatic Disease
| Characteristic | SDHB | SDHD | VHL | NF1 | No Mutation Identified | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 17 |
| AOI, years | ||||||
| Mean | 13.8 | 17 | 5.75 | 12.0 | 11.7 | 11.1 |
| SD | 4.19 | 4.27 | 5.66 | 3.44 | 4.87 | |
| Range | 8-18 | 3-12 | 8-16 | 6-16 | 3-18 | |
| AOD, years | ||||||
| Mean | 14.0 | 19 | 6.75 | 12.0 | 14.3 | 12.5 |
| SD | 3.74 | 3.59 | 5.66 | 4.50 | 5.11 | |
| Range | 9-18 | 4-12 | 8-16 | 6-18 | 4-19 | |
| Primary tumor, No. of patients* | ||||||
| Retroperitoneal | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Adrenal | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Head and neck | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Biochemistry, No. of patients† | ||||||
| NE | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
| EPI | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| NMN | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
| MN | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| CgA | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | |
| No. of patients with data unavailable | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
Abbreviations: AOD, age at initial tumor diagnosis; AOI, age at report of initial tumor-related symptoms; CgA, chromogranin A; DA, dopamine; EPI, epinephrine; MN, metanephrine; NE, norepinephrine; NF1, neurofibromatosis type 1; NMN, normetanephrine; SDHB, succinate dehydrogenase subunit B; SDHD, succinate dehydrogenase subunit D; VHL, von Hippel-Lindau.
Data are presented as the number of patients who presented with a primary tumor in the given location.
Data are presented as the number of patients who presented with an increase of the given catecholamine or MN/NMN at diagnosis of primary tumor.
Footnotes
See accompanying editorial on page 4070
Supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conception and design: Kathryn S. King, Tamara Prodanov, Karel Pacak
Administrative support: Constantine A. Stratakis
Provision of study materials or patients: Jacqueline K. Hewitt, Margaret Zacharin, Shana McCormack, Karel Pacak
Collection and assembly of data: Kathryn S. King, Tamara Prodanov, Jacqueline K. Hewitt, Margaret Zacharin, Maya Lodish, Margarita Raygada, Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo, Shana McCormack, Dragana Milosevic, Constantine A. Stratakis, Karel Pacak
Data analysis and interpretation: Kathryn S. King, Tamara Prodanov, Vitaly Kantorovich, Tito Fojo, Jacqueline K. Hewitt, Robert Wesley, Margarita Raygada, Graeme Eisenhofer, Electron Kebebew,Constantine A. Stratakis, Karel Pacak
Manuscript writing: All authors
Final approval of manuscript: All authors
REFERENCES
- 1.Hao HX, Khalimonchuk O, Schraders M, et al. SDH5, a gene required for flavination of succinate dehydrogenase, is mutated in paraganglioma. Science. 2009;325:1139–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.1175689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bayley JP, Kunst HP, Cascon A, et al. SDHAF2 mutations in familial and sporadic paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:366–372. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Qin Y, Yao L, King EE, et al. Germline mutations in TMEM127 confer susceptibility to pheochromocytoma. Nat Genet. 2010;42:229–233. doi: 10.1038/ng.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burnichon N, Brière JJ, Libé R, et al. SDHA is a tumor suppressor gene causing paraganglioma. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:3011–3020. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Willett-Brozick JE, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science. 2000;287:848–851. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Niemann S, Müller U. Mutations in SDHC cause autosomal dominant paraganglioma, type 3. Nat Genet. 2000;26:268–270. doi: 10.1038/81551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Astuti D, Latif F, Dallol A, et al. Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:49–54. doi: 10.1086/321282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Barontini M, Levin G, Sanso G. Characteristics of pheochromocytoma in a 4- to 20-year-old population. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1073:30–37. doi: 10.1196/annals.1353.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stackpole RH, Melicow MM, Uson AC. Pheochromocytoma in children. Report of 9 case and review of the first 100 published cases with follow-up studies. J Pediatr. 1963;63:314–330. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(63)80345-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ross JH. Pheochromocytoma. Special considerations in children. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27:393–402. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70088-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pham TH, Moir C, Thompson GB, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in children: A review of medical and surgical management at a tertiary care center. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1109–1117. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Neumann HP, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, et al. Germ-line mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1459–1466. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Linnoila RI, Keiser HR, Steinberg SM, et al. Histopathology of benign versus malignant sympathoadrenal paragangliomas: Clinicopathologic study of 120 cases including unusual histologic features. Hum Pathol. 1990;21:1168–1180. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(90)90155-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Waguespack SG, Rich T, Grubbs E, et al. A current review of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:2023–2037. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Reference deleted.
- 16.Timmers HJ, Kozupa A, Eisenhofer G, et al. Clinical presentations, biochemical phenotypes, and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with succinate dehydrogenase subunit B-associated pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:779–786. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brouwers FM, Eisenhofer G, Tao JJ, et al. High frequency of SDHB germline mutations in patients with malignant catecholamine-producing paragangliomas: Implications for genetic testing. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4505–4509. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Favier J, Brière JJ, Burnichon N, et al. The Warburg effect is genetically determined in inherited pheochromocytomas. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Favier J, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP. Pheochromocytomas: The (pseudo)-hypoxia hypothesis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24:957–968. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2010.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu Q, Liu R, Kashyap MV, et al. Brainstem glioma progression in juvenile and adult rats. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:849–855. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/11/0849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Sullivan P, et al. Biochemical and clinical manifestations of dopamine-producing paragangliomas: Utility of plasma methoxytyramine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:2068–2075. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Florkowski CM, Fairlamb DJ, Freeth MG, et al. Raised dopamine metabolites in a case of malignant paraganglioma. Postgrad Med J. 1990;66:471–473. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.66.776.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Azzarelli B, Felten S, Muller J, et al. Dopamine in paragangliomas of the glomus jugulare. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:573–578. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198805000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eisenhofer G, Lenders JW, Timmers H, et al. Measurements of plasma methoxytyramine, normetanephrine, and metanephrine as discriminators of different hereditary forms of pheochromocytoma. Clin Chem. 2011;57:411–420. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.153320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Burnichon N, Rohmer V, Amar L, et al. The succinate dehydrogenase genetic testing in a large prospective series of patients with paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:2817–2827. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Timmers HJ, Kozupa A, Chen CC, et al. Superiority of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to other functional imaging techniques in the evaluation of metastatic SDHB-associated pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2262–2269. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moore SW, Appfelstaedt J, Zaahl MG. Familial medullary carcinoma prevention, risk evaluation, and RET in children of families with MEN2. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:326–332. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kloos RT, Eng C, et al. American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force. Medullary thyroid cancer: Management guidelines of the American Thyroid Association. Thyroid. 2009;19:565–612. doi: 10.1089/thy.2008.0403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Janeway KA, Kim SY, Lodish M, et al. Defects in succinate dehydrogenase in gastrointestinal stromal tumors lacking KIT and PDGFRA mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:314–318. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009199108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



