Abstract
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strain BB12 in stimulated Caco-2 cells and to characterize the factors responsible for these anti-inflammatory effects. Characterization and purification studies indicate that BB12's anti-inflammatory factors might include a 50-kDa proteinaceous compound that is stable under a variety of heat and pH conditions.
TEXT
Human intestinal epithelia and luminal microbiota have a mutualistic relationship in which the resident bacteria aid in nutrient metabolism, development of the intestinal epithelium and lymphoid tissue, and resistance to pathogenic colonization (7, 8, 25). The microbiota also play an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory conditions such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (1), neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (21, 22), and inflammatory bowel diseases (9, 24).
Probiotics are live organisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host (2). Modification of gut microflora by probiotic therapy has therapeutic potential in clinical conditions associated with gut barrier dysfunction and inflamed mucosa (11). The most commonly researched probiotic species belong to the genera Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Saccharomyces (24). Bifidobacteria are part of the human microflora and dominate the intestinal microbiota of infants, but their abundance decreases over time so that bifidobacteria usually account for approximately 3 to 5% of the adult human colon microbiota (9, 15, 17, 27). Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis is a Gram-positive, anaerobic commensal-derived probiotic (26). Interestingly, recent investigations have suggested that B. animalis subsp. lactis has potent anti-inflammatory effects (10, 13). Although a large number of clinical and experimental studies of probiotics have been performed, neither the mechanisms of action nor the true characteristics of probiotic anti-inflammatory molecules are well understood. One mechanistic explanation for probiotic effects is suggested by the work of Neish et al. (18), which demonstrated that nonvirulent Salmonella attenuated tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)-induced interleukin-8 (IL-8) secretion by blocking IκBα degradation in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and thus inhibiting the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway. In another report, soluble proteins produced by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG were shown to prevent cytokine-induced apoptosis in both human and mouse intestinal epithelial cells (28). It is necessary to characterize the specific anti-inflammatory components of probiotics and to identify the precise mechanisms of probiotic action.
The activation of the proinflammatory gene transcriptional program in intestinal epithelial cells in response to bacterial products, such as lipopolysaccharides (LPSs), or to inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α or IL-1β, is associated with acute and chronic intestinal inflammation (3, 5). Inflammatory signaling ultimately converges on the NF-κB transcriptional system (16). The activation of NF-κB then upregulates the expression of various proinflammatory genes involved in intestinal inflammation (4). NF-κB is usually bound to the inhibitory molecule IκB in the cytoplasm, but phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and proteolysis of IκB occur in response to certain stimuli, resulting in NF-κB nuclear translocation and proinflammatory mediation (19). The gastrointestinal tract appears to be tolerant of certain commensal bacteria because they inhibit the degradation of IκB and thereby prevent NF-κB translation (3).
Because of the central role of NF-κB signaling in the immune response, we speculated that B. animalis subsp. lactis mediates anti-inflammatory effects by modulating NF-κB signaling pathways in IECs. Therefore, we hypothesized that B. animalis subsp. lactis could inhibit NF-κB and proinflammatory gene expression in IECs. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of B. animalis subsp. lactis BB12 on IL-8 production and on the activation of the NF-κB pathway when stimulated by TNF-α in Caco-2 cells. Our goal was to determine the characteristics of the anti-inflammatory components of BB12 that have this effect.
BB12 inhibits TNF-α-induced IL-8 expression via suppression of NF-κB activation in Caco-2 cells.
To examine the mechanism by which BB12 regulates IL-8 expression in colon epithelial cells, Caco-2 colon epithelial cells were pretreated with various concentrations of BB12 for 12 h and then stimulated with TNF-α (10 ng/ml) for 3 h. Treatment of Caco-2 cells with TNF-α induced dramatic increases in IL-8 mRNA expression measured by real-time PCR (Fig. 1A) and protein secretion detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Fig. 1B). However, BB12 significantly suppressed the TNF-α-induced IL-8 expression when added at a concentration of 1 × 109 CFU/ml. Because IL-8 expression has been reported to be related to the activation of NF-κB, we also examined whether the inhibitory effect of BB12 on IL-8 expression is mediated through the regulation of NF-κB activation. TNF-α increased NF-κB nuclear translocation and IκBα phosphorylation while decreasing IκBα levels in Caco-2 cells (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, TNF-α stimulation (10 ng/ml) led to a 6-fold increase in NF-κB transcriptional activity in cells transfected with a plasmid bearing genes for NF-κB and luciferase (Fig. 1D). However, treatment of the cells with BB12 (1 × 109 CFU/ml) inhibited the TNF-α-induced transcriptional activity of NF-κB. There have been several in vitro investigations that provide some information about the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of probiotics. Kim and colleagues (13) demonstrated that B. animalis subsp. lactis inhibits NF-κB and NF-κB-regulated genes in IECs and prevents acute colitis in mice.
Fig. 1.
Inhibitory effect of BB12 on TNF-α-induced IL-8 expression is mediated through suppression of NF-κB activation in Caco-2 cells. (A) Total RNA was extracted from BB12-treated Caco-2 cells after TNF-α stimulation, and IL-8 mRNA expression was quantified by real-time PCR. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. *, P < 0.01 compared with TNF-α-stimulated cells without the BB12 pretreatment. (B) IL-8 protein secretion in culture supernatants was quantified with an ELISA kit. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. *, P < 0.01 compared with TNF-α-stimulated cells without the BB12 pretreatment. (C) Caco-2 cells were pretreated with BB12 (1 × 109 CFU/ml) for 12 h and then stimulated with TNF-α (10 ng/ml) for 15 min. Proteins were extracted from the cells. Nuclear extracts were analyzed for NF-κB (p65) using anti-human NF-κB antibody. Cytosolic extracts were analyzed with anti-human IκBα and phospho-IκBα (pIκBα) antibodies. (D) Caco-2 cells were transfected with a NF-κB luciferase (firefly) construct together with pRL-TK (Renilla luciferase) as a transfection control using the GeneJammer transfection reagent. After transfection, the cells were stimulated with TNF-α in the presence of BB12. Luciferase activities were determined using a dual-luciferase reporter assay kit and normalized to the control values. Data are means and standard deviations from three independent experiments. *, P < 0.01 compared with TNF-α-stimulated cells without the BB12 pretreatment.
In the study of Dahan et al., nonpathogenic Salmonella did not inhibit the phosphorylation of IκBα, whereas Saccharomyces boulardii (4) inhibited phosphorylation of IκBα that was induced by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infections. In addition, Jijon et al. (12) reported that probiotic DNA inhibited IL-8 secretion and delayed NF-κB activation in the presence of proinflammatory stimuli. These different results could be caused by differences in the probiotic strains, the number of probiotic treatments, or the proinflammatory stimuli used in the studies. Our results demonstrate that BB12 attenuated TNF-α-induced NF-κB pathway activation by interfering with IκBα degradation in Caco-2 cells. Further studies will be required to determine the precise step associated with the effect of BB12 in the NF-κB pathway.
BB12 produces soluble factors that inhibit TNF-α-induced IL-8 elevation.
To elucidate the mechanism of IL-8 inhibition, potential components of the bacterium-cell interaction were separated and studied individually. The inability of heat-killed BB12 to generate a response allowed us to exclude bacterial wall components as stimuli. Interestingly, conditioned medium (CM) from cocultured bacteria and Caco-2 cells, even when heat inactivated, was sufficient to inhibit IL-8 expression (Fig. 2A). To find out whether bacterium-cell coculture was required for the production of stimulatory molecules, culture supernatant (CS) from BB12 grown without Caco-2 cells was used. This CS was virtually as effective as CM in which bacterium-cell contact had occurred (Fig. 2B). These results indicate that soluble factors generated from bacteria alone, independent of contact between bacteria and cells, inhibit IL-8 production. Other studies have reported similar observations, demonstrating that soluble factors secreted by probiotics are sufficient to beneficially modulate host cell functions (14, 27).
Fig. 2.
Secreted factors from BB12 inhibit TNF-α-induced IL-8 production. (A) Caco-2 cells were incubated for 12 h with the nontreated (NT) control, viable (live) or heat-killed (HK) BB12, fresh conditioned medium (CM), or heat-inactivated CM of BB12 (HI CM) in the presence or absence of TNF-α. (B) Caco-2 cells were incubated for 12 h with the NT control, CM, BB12 culture supernatant (CS), or HI CS in the presence or absence of TNF-α. IL-8 production in the supernatant of Caco-2 cells was estimated by ELISA. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. *, P < 0.05 compared with TNF-α-stimulated cells in the absence of BB12. (C) Caco-2 cells were treated with the nontreated (NT) control or the component extracts from CS either alone or together with TNF-α (10 ng/ml). The IL-8 protein level in the supernatant of Caco-2 cells was estimated by ELISA. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. *, P < 0.05 compared with TNF-α-stimulated cells in the absence of BB12. (D) Caco-2 cells were treated with the nontreated (NT) control or CS from different pH conditions either alone or together with TNF-α (10 ng/ml). The IL-8 protein level in the supernatant of Caco-2 cells was estimated by ELISA. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. *, P < 0.05 compared with TNF-α-stimulated cells in the absence of BB12.
Physical and chemical characteristics of soluble factors from the CS.
Attempts were made to determine the properties of the active IL-8-inhibitory fraction by extracting and precipitating with ethanol, ethyl acetate, or 60% ammonium sulfate (AS). The majority of activity was found in the 60% AS precipitate, whereas little or no activity was extracted by ethanol or ethyl acetate, indicating that the active component may have a proteinaceous rather than carbohydrate or lipid nature (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2C). To further investigate the nature of the active components, various treatments were tested. The IL-8-inhibitory activity of the CS was abrogated after treatment with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and SDS at final concentrations of 12% (vol/vol) and 0.5%, respectively (data not shown). The CS was also found to be relatively stable in the neutral and acidic pH ranges, whereas the activity disappeared rapidly at pH values over 8.0 (Fig. 2D). The activity of CS also remained unaffected by 15 min of heating up to 90°C, and 50% of the original activity persisted after 15 min of heat treatment at 121°C (data not shown). These results may indicate that the active components of BB12 CS are active in a low pH range and heat stable over a fairly wide temperature range. The compounds may also be protein or peptides, as suggested by the results of TCA precipitation and SDS denaturation in conjunction with AS precipitation. The heat and pH stability of this activity may prove to be useful in applications where CS components are used as food adjuncts.
Purification of the active IL-8 inhibitory components in CS.
To purify proteins from CS, filtered CS was loaded onto UNOsphere S ion exchange medium (with negatively charged functional groups), and bound proteins were eluted using 40 mM Tris (pH 6.9) containing an increasing gradient of NaCl from 100 mM to 800 mM. Eluted proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE to identify the proteins contained in each fraction (data not shown). A 50-kilodalton protein (p50) was eluted from the cation exchange resin at NaCl concentrations of 350 mM (Fig. 3A). SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that the chromatography procedure successfully separated p50.
Fig. 3.
Purification of the active IL-8 inhibitory components in CS. (A) Eluted proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with a colloidal blue stain kit (lane 3). Proteins present in fractions of broth and BB12 CS and concentrated using a 5-kilodalton cutoff filter are shown (lanes 1 and 2). (B) Caco-2 cells were pretreated with purified p50 at the indicated concentrations for 12 h and then stimulated with TNF-α (10 ng/ml). IL-8 protein secretion in culture supernatants was quantified with an ELISA kit.
To determine the biological roles of purified proteins from CS, the effects of p50 on the TNF-α-induced IL-8 production in Caco-2 cells was evaluated. Cells were treated with various concentrations of p50, and IL-8 production was determined by ELISA. p50 at 10 to 1,000 ng/ml inhibited IL-8 production in a concentration-dependent manner in Caco-2 cells (Fig. 3B). As controls, we tested the flowthrough fraction from the ion exchange column and the fraction eluted from the column with 200 mM NaCl: neither of these preparation contained p50, and neither of these preparations inhibited IL-8 production (data not shown).
To summarize, a soluble factor secreted by BB12 inhibited the TNF-α-induced production of IL-8 in Caco-2 cells. We showed that the inhibitory effect of BB12 on TNF-α-induced IL-8 production was at the transcriptional level and operated at least in part through inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway. The active component in CS might include a 50-kDa compound with a proteinaceous nature that is stable under a variety of temperature and pH conditions. These findings support the potential application of probiotics or probiotic components in the prevention of cytokine-mediated injury in inflammatory intestinal diseases.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Scientific Foundation of Jilin Province (grant no. 2011026).
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 16 September 2011.
REFERENCES
- 1. Alverdy J. C., Chang E. B. 2008. The re-emerging role of the intestinal microflora in critical illness and inflammation: why the gut hypothesis of sepsis syndrome will not go away. J. Leukoc. Biol. 83:461–466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Araya, et al. 2002. Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Joint FAO/WHO Working Group Report on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food, London, Ontario, Canada, April 30 and May 1, 2002 [Google Scholar]
- 3. Claud E. C., et al. 2004. Developmentally regulated IkappaB expression in intestinal epithelium and susceptibility to flagellin-induced inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:7404–7408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Dahan S., et al. 2003. Saccharomyces boulardii interferes with enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli-induced signaling pathways in T84 cells. Infect. Immun. 71:766–773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. De Plaen I. G., et al. 2000. Lipopolysaccharide activates nuclear factor kappa B in rat intestine: role of endogenous platelet activating factor and tumour necrosis factor. Br. J. Pharmacol. 129:307–314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Reference deleted.
- 7. Hooper L. V. 2004. Bacterial contributions to mammalian gut development. Trends Microbiol. 12:129–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hooper L. V., Gordon J. I. 2001. Commensal host-bacterial relationships in the gut. Science 292:1115–1118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hopkins M. J., Sharp R., Macfarlane G. T. 2001. Age and disease related changes in intestinal bacterial populations assessed by cell culture, 16S rRNA abundance, and community cellular fatty acid profiles. Gut 48:198–205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Imaoka A., et al. 2008. Anti-inflammatory activity of probiotic Bifidobacterium: enhancement of IL-10 production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from ulcerative colitis patients and inhibition of IL-8 secretion in HT-29 cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 14:2511–2516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Isolauri E. 2001. Probiotics and human disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:1142S–1146S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jijon H., et al. 2004. DNA from probiotic bacteria modulates murine and human epithelial and immune function. Gastroenterology 126:1358–1373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kim S. W., et al. 2010. Bifidobacterium lactis inhibits NF-kappaB in intestinal epithelial cells and prevents acute colitis and colitis-associated colon cancer in mice. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 16:1514–1525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kim Y., Whang J. Y., Whang K. Y., Oh S., Kim S. H. 2008. Characterization of the cholesterol-reducing activity in a cell-free supernatant of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72:1483–1490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Langendijk P. S., et al. 1995. Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of Bifidobacterium spp. with genus-specific 16S rRNA-targeted probes and its application in fecal samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3069–3075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Li Q., Verma I. M. 2002. NF-κB regulation in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2:725–734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Matsuki T., Watanabe K., Fujimoto J., Takada T., Tanaka R. 2002. Development of 16S rRNA gene-targeted group-specific primers for the detection and identification of predominant bacteria in human feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:5445–5451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Neish A. S., et al. 2000. Prokaryotic regulation of epithelial responses by inhibition of IkappaB-alpha ubiquitination. Science 289:1560–1563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Neish A. S. 2002. The gut microflora and intestinal epithelial cells: a continuing dialogue. Microbes Infect. 4:309–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Reference deleted.
- 21. Neu J. 2005. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: an update. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 94:100–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Neu J., Douglas-Escobar M., Lopez M. 2007. Microbes and the developing gastrointestinal tract. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 22:174–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Reference deleted.
- 24. Rastall R. A., et al. 2005. Modulation of the microbial ecology of the human colon by probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics to enhance human health: an overview of enabling science and potential applications. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 52:145–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Rautava S., Walker W. A. 2007. Commensal bacteria and epithelial cross talk in the developing intestine. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 9:385–392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Reuter G. 2001. The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium microflora of the human intestine: composition and succession. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. 2:43–53 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sougioultzis S., et al. 2006. Saccharomyces boulardii produces a soluble anti-inflammatory factor that inhibits NF-kappaB-mediated IL-8 gene expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 343:69–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Yan F., et al. 2007. Soluble proteins produced by probiotic bacteria regulate intestinal epithelial cell survival and growth. Gastroenterology 132:562–575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



