Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-degrading bacteria associated with an algal bloom in Tampa Bay, FL, were investigated by stable isotope probing (SIP) with uniformly labeled [13C]naphthalene. The dominant sequences in clone libraries constructed from 13C-enriched bacterial DNA (from naphthalene enrichments) were identified as uncharacterized members of the family Rhodobacteraceae. Quantitative PCR primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene of these uncultivated organisms were used to determine their abundance in incubations amended with unlabeled naphthalene and phenanthrene, both of which showed substantial increases in gene copy numbers during the experiments. As demonstrated by this work, the application of uniformly 13C-labeled PAHs in SIP experiments can successfully be used to identify novel PAH-degrading bacteria in marine waters.
TEXT
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are an important class of chemical compounds commonly associated with petrochemicals. Based on their poor water solubility, toxicity, persistence, and potential to bioaccumulate, PAHs are recognized as high-priority pollutants in the environment and are of significant concern to human health (1, 4). In the marine environment, phytoplankton have been correlated with the removal of PAHs from the water column, particularly during periods of bloom (3, 5, 14, 18, 30). It has been inferred that phytoplankton adsorb PAHs from the surrounding seawater, subsequently transporting them to the sea floor by sedimentation (3, 14). With the potential of phytoplankton cells to accumulate PAH molecules onto their surface (2, 16), one might assume the formation of an enrichment zone for PAH-degrading bacteria. In this study, DNA-based stable isotope probing (SIP), a method that links function with identity in complex microbial communities (8), was used to identify PAH-degrading bacteria associated with an algal bloom in Tampa Bay, FL.
Water samples were collected (0.5-m depth) on 27 July 2009, near the Howard Franklin Bridge in Tampa Bay, FL. The samples were preserved in Lugol's iodine solution prior to taxonomic identification of the algal community and estimation of cell concentrations under the phase microscope (13). During that week, discoloration of the water, which was attributed to a bloom of the dinoflagellate Pyrodinium bahamense (ca. 3.7 × 106 cells/liter), was observed in a stretch of the bay extending from the Gandy Bridge to Oldsmar. Two other microalgae, Rhizosolenia setigera and Gyrosigma sp., were identified in significantly lower numbers, 9.3 × 104 cells/liter and 1.4 × 104 cells/liter, respectively. The dinocyst count was 4.6 × 103 per liter. Approximately 150 ml of water sample was passed aseptically through a stainless steel 224-μm-pore-size mesh to remove zooplankton. Using low vacuum pressure, the filtrate was then passed through a Whatman grade 1 filter to retain the microalgae. The microalgal fraction was then washed 6 times with naturally aged autoclaved seawater to remove as much of the free-living (i.e., non-algae-associated) bacterial population as possible and then resuspended in 40 ml of naturally aged autoclaved seawater to act as the inoculum for the SIP experiment.
All incubations were performed in 125-ml sterilized glass screw-top Erlenmeyer flasks with caps that were lined with aluminum foil to prevent sorption of PAHs. Each flask contained 19 ml of ONR7a synthetic seawater medium (9), 1 mg of labeled (14C/13C) and/or unlabeled substrate, and 1 ml of the washed algal suspension as the inoculum. For SIP, duplicate flasks were prepared with 1 mg of uniformly 13C-labeled naphthalene ([U-13C]naphthalene), and a second set of duplicates was prepared with 1 mg of unlabeled naphthalene. To determine the endpoint of the SIP experiment, mineralization of [U-14C]naphthalene was measured periodically, starting at day 4, by liquid scintillation counting of 14CO2 trapped in KOH-soaked filter paper (24). Mineralization was monitored in triplicate flasks containing unlabeled (1 mg) and radiolabeled (20,000 dpm) naphthalene, for which an endpoint of 14 days was determined (Fig. 1). An additional set of triplicate flasks was used to monitor the disappearance of unlabeled naphthalene by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Samples were periodically taken from these flasks, and their DNA was extracted to subsequently measure for changes in the abundance of the target organisms identified through SIP. Triplicate flasks of acid-killed controls (pH < 2) containing unlabeled naphthalene were prepared by adding ca. 700 μl of 85% phosphoric acid. Finally, triplicate flasks containing unlabeled phenanthrene were incubated as described for incubations with naphthalene to assess whether naphthalene-degrading bacteria identified by SIP could also grow on phenanthrene. All flasks were incubated on an orbital shaker (250 rpm; 21°C) in the dark. Unlabeled naphthalene (>99%) and phenanthrene (>96%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). [U-13C]naphthalene was synthesized by methods described elsewhere (32). [U-14C]naphthalene (17.8 mCi mmol−1) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
Fig. 1.
Cumulative 14CO2 recovered from incubations with [14C]naphthalene (circles) and naphthalene removal from incubations with unlabeled naphthalene as measured by HPLC (squares) by the Tampa Bay algal field sample. Each data point is the mean of results from triplicate flasks ± standard deviations. Filled symbols represent live cultures (non-acid treated); open symbols represent acid-inhibited controls. Some error bars are smaller than the symbols.
At the 14-day endpoint, whole DNA from the total volume in the paired flasks amended with [U-13C]naphthalene and the corresponding paired set with unlabeled naphthalene was extracted using the method of Tillett and Neilan (27), and isopycnic centrifugation was used to separate 13C-enriched and unenriched DNA fractions as previously described (12). Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) using 6.5% acrylamide gels containing a denaturant range of 30 to 60% was performed on each fraction to visualize the separation of DNA. PCR primers for DGGE were 63FGC (17) and 517R (20) with a PCR program as described by Yu and Morrison (31). Colors of the gel images were inverted and adjusted for contrast, and the images were cropped to only the regions displaying bands with the GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP; version 2.6.8). To identify naphthalene-degrading bacteria, a 16S rRNA clone library comprising 91 clones was prepared from the 13C-enriched DNA fractions (25) and partially sequenced using primer 27f (29) at the Beckman Coulter Genomics sequencing facility (Danvers, MA). These 13C-enriched heavy DNA fractions were selected based on the evidence provided in Fig. 2, which is discussed below. The clone sequences were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on a 3% distance cutoff. Using the complete linkage clustering and dereplicate tools available at RDP's Pyrosequencing Pipeline (6), one representative sequence was selected to represent the dominant OTU identified in the library. A near-complete 16S rRNA gene sequence for the organism represented by this clone was obtained at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Genome Analysis Facility. CLUSTAL_X (26) was used to align this sequence with close relatives and construct a bootstrapped (1,000 times) neighbor-joining tree.
Fig. 2.
Distribution of the uncharacterized Rhodobacteraceae (Uncl. Rhodo.) sequences in separated SIP fractions. (Top) DGGE image of bacterial PCR products from separated [12C]naphthalene fractions with decreasing densities from left to right. (Middle) DGGE image of bacterial PCR products from separated [13C]naphthalene fractions aligned to equivalent [12C]naphthalene fractions. The representative clonal sequence used to generate the qPCR standard curve is indicated on the right. (Bottom) Distribution of qPCR-quantified, uncharacterized Rhodobacteraceae 16S rRNA gene sequences in fractions from [12C]naphthalene incubations (closed circles with solid line) and from [13C]naphthalene incubations (open circles with dashed line) presented as the number of genes in a fraction as a percentage of the total genes quantified in the displayed range of fractions. Data points are aligned with equivalent fractions of the DGGE images.
Primers for real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) were developed to quantify sequences in the dominant OTU. The representative sequence was imported and automatically aligned in the ARB-SILVA SSURef 94 database (22) and manually refined, taking into account the secondary structural information of the rRNA molecule. The Probe Design and Probe Match tools of the ARB software were used to design primers that were specific for this representative sequence. The primers were named Unc_57F (5′-AAC GTG CCC TTC ACT ACG-3′) and Unc_128R (5′-CCG ATC CTT CAC CGA AAT-3′). Primer specificity was confirmed with the Probe Check tool of RDP-II. The Unc_57F primer hit 184 sequences, of which 180 belonged to members within the Rhodobacteraceae, 3 to unclassified proteobacteria, and 1 to a gammaproteobacterium; the Unc_128R primer hit 108 sequences, all of which belonged to members within the Rhodobacteraceae. The optimal annealing temperature of the primer set (57°C) was determined using an Eppendorf Mastercycler gradient thermal cycler (Hauppauge, NY). The template for this reaction, and for construction of a standard curve for quantitative PCR, was a plasmid containing a representative sequence which had been linearized using PstI (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) and purified using the QIAquick nucleotide removal kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The amplification efficiency of the primers (21) was determined to be 1.92.
Purified DNA from time series incubations with unlabeled PAH was quantified using a NanoDrop ND-3300 fluorospectrometer (Thermo, Waltham, MA) and the Quant-iT Picogreen double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). As duplicates of the separated 12C- and 13C-labeled naphthalene incubations displayed similar distributions of DNA in the fractions, as well as similar DGGE profiles, only the replicate incubation whose fractions contained the highest total amount of DNA was used for further analyses. SIP-identified sequences were quantified in each separated SIP fraction using a single reaction by qPCR as described previously (25). Single reactions of triplicate DNA extractions were performed for samples from the time series containing either unlabeled naphthalene or phenanthrene.
Complete removal of naphthalene occurred by day 7, whereas mineralization of 14C associated with naphthalene continued up until day 14 (the selected endpoint of the experiment) (Fig. 1). All live (non-acid-treated) incubations were observed to produce a pale-yellow coloration after 4 to 6 days, which is indicative for the formation of a muconic semialdehyde intermediate(s) from the degradation of naphthalene via a catabolic pathway involving a meta-ring cleavage enzyme(s) (7). The yellow coloration faded by day 11 and was not detectable by day 14, indicating that further metabolism of the intermediate(s) had occurred. Degradation and mineralization of the naphthalene can be attributed solely to bacterial activity, because the incubations were conducted in the dark, which would not support the growth of the algae or, rather, suppress their activity for prolonged periods. Supporting this, microscopic examination of the incubations revealed that the algal cells had undergone extensive intracellular bleaching and, essentially, appeared nonviable.
DGGE analysis of the fractions derived from the labeled and unlabeled incubations showed clear evidence of isotopic enrichment of DNA in [13C]naphthalene incubations, separation of 13C-labeled and unlabeled DNA, and different banding patterns between the 13C-enriched and unenriched DNA fractions (Fig. 2). One band in particular was especially dominant in fractions containing 13C-enriched DNA. For the 13C incubation shown in Fig. 2, fractions 4 to 8 were combined and used in the generation of the 16S rRNA gene clone library. Fractions 5 to 9 of the duplicate gradient were combined in a similar fashion (data not shown). After excluding vector sequences, poor sequence reads, chimeras, and singleton sequences, the clone library constructed from pooled 13C-enriched DNA comprised 90 sequences. These 90 sequences exhibited 99.1% sequence identity and, hence, represented a single OTU. Classifier analysis in RDP-II (28), at the 80% confidence threshold, indicated that this OTU represented a clade of uncultivated and unclassified bacteria within the family Rhodobacteraceae. The PCR-DGGE product of the representative sequence of this OTU aligned with the dominant PCR product present in 13C-enriched DNA fractions (Fig. 2). Using 18S rRNA-specific primers EK-1F, EK-82F, and EK-1520R under previously described conditions (15), the pooled 13C-enriched DNA was not found to contain any algal DNA, thus further supporting the unlikelihood that the algal community from the Tampa Bay water sample contributed to the degradation and mineralization of the naphthalene.
The near-complete 16S rRNA gene sequence (1,427 bp) that was selected to represent this OTU (designated TBNAP74) was used to construct a phylogenetic tree with related sequences as determined by BLASTN searches of GenBank (Fig. 3). The closest relative to this unclassified Rhodobacteraceae was to a single environmental clone, M71-N108 (GenBank accession number FM992772; 99.8% sequence similarity), an alphaproteobacterium recently isolated from the deep oligotrophic Eastern Mediterranean Sea (10). The next highest levels of similarity (≤96% sequence identity) were to environmental and cultivated strains that belonged predominantly to the Roseobacter clade. Members within this clade are widely recognized for possessing multiple ring-cleaving pathways (19) and are almost always found in high abundance during algal blooms (11). However, the ≥3% sequence difference for members of this clade to the newly identified OTU (i.e., unclassified Rhodobacteraceae) identified in this study is sufficiently distinct as to possibly represent a new phylogenetic taxon within this clade. The dominant representation of these unclassified Rhodobacteraceae in the clone library suggests that they may possess a competitive advantage (i.e., specialization) for degrading naphthalene over other bacteria in this Tampa Bay algal field sample.
Fig. 3.
Phylogenetic relationships among the unclassified Rhodobacteraceae TBNAP74 representative sequence recovered from heavy (13C-enriched) fractions in this study (shown in bold) and closely related type strains of the family Rhodobacteraceae. GenBank accession numbers are in parentheses. The tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining algorithm. Only bootstrap values above 50% are shown (1,000 replications). Bar, 1% estimated sequence divergence.
During incubations of the algal sample with unlabeled naphthalene or phenanthrene, the 16S rRNA gene copy number for this unclassified Rhodobacteraceae OTU increased by several orders of magnitude (Fig. 4), thus providing further confirmation of its enrichment on at least two low-molecular-weight PAHs as growth substrates. By day 7 of the naphthalene enrichment, the gene copy number increased by ca. 5 orders of magnitude, coinciding with the time frame for the disappearance and mineralization of this compound (Fig. 1). As the gene copy number did not substantially increase after day 7, there was no evidence for growth of these organisms on the colored metabolite detected in the medium, although they may have aided its disappearance. In flasks amended with unlabeled phenanthrene, the gene copy number increased by ca. 3 orders of magnitude from days 1 to 9. This increase in gene copy number for both sets of incubations with unlabeled substrate coincided with an increase in the total concentration of DNA, an indicator of cell growth. Collectively, the low bacterial diversity identified in the heavy DNA fractions, which is almost exclusively represented by the unclassified Rhodobacteraceae OTU (Fig. 2), and the dramatic increase in the abundance of these organisms by day 7 in the naphthalene incubations and by day 6 in the phenanthrene incubations strongly support that this newly identified OTU was solely responsible for degradation of these PAHs. Additionally, the growth of these organisms coinciding with PAH disappearance and the appearance of their 16S rRNA genes only in the most heavily enriched 13C-DNA fractions of incubations containing a labeled substrate suggest that their presence in clone libraries was not due to cross-feeding on a PAH metabolite. However, we cannot disregard the possibility that other bacterial taxa in the Tampa Bay algal bloom also possessed the capacity to degrade either naphthalene (or phenanthrene) or its metabolites; they were merely not strongly represented in the most highly 13C-enriched fractions analyzed.
Fig. 4.

Abundance of uncharacterized Rhodobacteraceae 16S rRNA genes during incubation with either unlabeled naphthalene (top) or phenanthrene (bottom). Bars are the averages and standard deviations of results from triplicate qPCRs measuring the abundance of group-specific 16S rRNA genes. Circles are the means and standard deviations of triplicate measurements of the total mass of DNA per sample. Bars or data points with asterisks represent numbers with one or more readings below the quantification limit of the assay and are presented as the largest possible value for that point.
To our knowledge, this is the first study employing SIP with a U-13C-labeled PAH to identify the PAH-degrading bacterial community in a marine water sample. We identified a novel PAH-degrading clade which was found associated with a toxic algal bloom in Tampa Bay, FL. These organisms, which have low taxonomic affiliation to any characterized strain, represent unclassified members of the family Rhodobacteraceae. Considering that the majority of microorganisms in our biosphere are resistant to cultivation (23), this work highlights the importance of pursuing cultivation-independent methods to reveal further information on PAH-degrading microorganisms, particularly in ocean environments for which SIP experiments employing hydrocarbon substrates have been scarcely employed.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The 16S rRNA representative gene sequence was deposited in GenBank under the accession number JN166983.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship (PIOF-GA-2008-220129) within the 7th European Community Framework Programme. Partial support was also provided by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (grant number 5 P42 ES005948).
We thank Stephen Richardson for assistance with HPLC analysis and Cynthia Heil for providing the water sample from Tampa Bay. We also especially thank three independent, anonymous reviewers for making invaluable comments about the manuscript.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 16 September 2011.
REFERENCES
- 1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 2007. CERCLA priority list of hazardous substances. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/cercla/07list.html [Google Scholar]
- 2. Andelman J. B., Suess M. J. 1970. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in the water environment. Bull. World Health Organ. 43:479–508 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Binark N., Guven K. C., Gezgin T., Unlu S. 2000. Oil pollution of marine algae. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 64:866–872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Boehm P. D., Page D. S. 2007. Exposure elements in oil spill risk and natural resource damage assessments: a review. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 13:418–448 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Buesseler K. O. 1998. The decoupling of production and particulate export in the surface ocean. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 12:297–310 [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cole J. R., et al. 2007. The ribosomal database project (RDP-II): introducing myRDP space and quality controlled public data. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D169–D172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Cuskey S. M., Olsen R. H. 1988. Catabolism of aromatic biogenic amines by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 via meta cleavage of homoprotocatechuic acid. J. Bacteriol. 170:393–399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dumont M. G., Murrell J. C. 2005. Stable isotope probing—linking microbial identity to function. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3:499–504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Dyksterhouse S. E., Gray J. P., Herwig R. P., Cano Lara J., Staley J. T. 1995. Cycloclasticus pugetii gen. nov., sp.nov., an aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium from marine sediments. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:116–123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gärtner A., Blümel M., Wiese J., Imhoff J. F. 2011. Isolation and characterization of bacteria from the Eastern Mediterranean deep sea. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 100:421–435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gonzalez J. M., et al. 2000. Bacterial community structure associated with a dimethylsulfoniopropionate-producing North Atlantic algal bloom. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4237–4246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jones M. D., Singleton D. R., Sun W., Aitken M. D. 2011. Multiple DNA extractions coupled with stable-isotope probing of anthracene-degrading bacteria in contaminated soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:2984–2991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Karlson B., Godhe A., Cusack C., Bresnan E. 2011. Introduction to methods for quantitative phytoplankton analysis, p. 5–12 In Karlson B., Godhe A., Cusack C., Bresnan E. (ed.), Microscopic and molecular methods for quantitative phytoplankton analysis. IOC Manuals and Guides, no. 55. UNESCO, Paris, France [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kowalewska G. 1999. Phytoplankton—the main factor responsible for transport of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from water to sediments in the Southern Baltic ecosystem. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56:219–222 [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lopez-Garzia P., Rodriguez-Valera F., Pedros-Alio C., Moreira D. 2001. Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic plankton. Nature 409:603–607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Mallet L., Sardou J. 1964. Investigation on the presence of the BP-type PH in the plankton environment of the region of the Bay of Villefranche (Alpes-Maritimes region). C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. (Paris) 258:5264–5267 [Google Scholar]
- 17. Marchesi J. R., et al. 1998. Design and evaluation of useful bacterium-specific PCR primers that amplify genes coding for bacterial 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:795–799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Millard E. S., Halfon E., Minns C. K., Charlton C. C. 1993. Effect of primary productivity and vertical mixing on PCB dynamics in planktonic model ecosystems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12:931–946 [Google Scholar]
- 19. Moran M. A., et al. 2007. Ecological genomics of marine roseobacters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:4559–4569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Muyzer G., de Waal E. C., Uitterlinden A. G. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:695–700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Pfaffl M. W. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2002–2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Pruesse E., et al. 2007. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acid Res. 35:7188–7196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Rappe M. S., Giovannoni S. J. 2003. The uncultured microbial majority. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57:369–394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Singleton D. R., Richardson S. D., Aitken M. D. 2008. Effects of enrichment with phthalate on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation in contaminated soil. Biodegradation 19:577–587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Singleton D. R., Sangaiah R., Gold A., Ball L. M., Aitken M. D. 2006. Identification and quantification of uncultivated Proteobacteria associated with pyrene degradation in a bioreactor treating PAH-contaminated soil. Environ. Microbiol. 8:1736–1745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. 1994. CLUSTAL_X: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673–4680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Tillett D., Neilan B. A. 2000. Xanthogenate nucleic acid isolation from cultured and environmental cyanobacteria. J. Phycol. 36:251–258 [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang Q., Garrity G. M., Tiedje J. M., Cole J. R. 2007. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:5261–5267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wilmotte A., van der Auwera G., De Wachter R. 1993. Structure of the 16S ribosomal RNA of the thermophilic cyanobacterium Chlorogloeopsis HTF (‘Mastigocladus laminosus HTF’) strain PCC7518, and phylogenetic analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 317:96–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Witt G. 2002. Occurrence and transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the water bodies of the Baltic Sea. Mar. Chem. 79:49–66 [Google Scholar]
- 31. Yu Z., Morrison M. 2004. Comparisons of different hypervariable regions of rrs genes for use in fingerprinting of microbial communities by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:4800–4806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zhang Z., Sangaiah R., Gold A., Ball L. M. 2011. Synthesis of uniformly 13C-labeled polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Org. Biomol. Chem. 9:5431–5435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



