Abstract
Brachybacterium squillarum M-6-3T was isolated from salt-fermented seafood in Korea and belongs to the Dermabacteraceae, a rather isolated family within the actinobacterial suborder Micrococcineae. Here, we present the draft genome sequence of the type strain Brachybacterium squillarum M-6-3T (3,191,479 bp), a Gram-positive bacterium with high (72.8%) G+C content.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
The genus Brachybacterium belongs to the family Dermabacteraceae (class Actinobacteria). Organisms belonging to that genus are Gram-positive bacteria containing genomic DNA with high guanine and cytosine content (4, 18). Since the genus was first identified in 1988, 14 species (Brachybacterium alimentarium, B. conglomeratum, B. faecium, B. fresconis, B. muris, B. nesterenkovii, B. paraconglomeratum, B. phenoliresistens, B. rhamnosum, B. sacelli, B. saurashtrense, B. squillarum, B. tyrofer- mentans, and B. zhongshanense) have been isolated from various sources (2–4, 6–8, 13, 15, 16, 20). We isolated type strain B. squillarum M-6-3T, a Gram-positive, nonmotile, coccoid-shaped bacterium with high G+C content, while studying the microbial diversity of salt-fermented foods made of tiny shrimp (13). The genus Brachybacterium has been characterized previously (4), and the strain possesses a type A4γ peptidoglycan with meso-diaminopimelic acid as the diagnostic cell-wall diamino acid (13). In the present report, we describe the genome sequence of B. squillarum M-6-3T; only a complete genome sequence of B. faecium, the type species, had been reported (10) when our sequencing project began.
The genome sequence was determined using the Roche/454 GS (FLX Titanium) and Illumina paired-end sequencing platforms (8-kb library and 100-bp library, respectively). A total of 163,759 reads were obtained using the Roche/454 GS platform, providing approximately 13-fold genome coverage. The Illumina platform yielded 10,407,717 reads, corresponding to 245-fold coverage. The Roche/454 GS and Illumina reads were assembled using GS Assembler 2.5.1 software (Roche Diagnostics, Branford, CT) and CLC genomics workbench 4.7.2 software (CLCbio, Denmark), respectively.
The sequences were assembled into 8 large contigs, which were then assembled into a scaffold with an N50 contig size of approximately 80.2 kb (where N50 is the contig length such that at least 50% of the bases of the assembly are contained within contigs of the same size or larger). Gene prediction (5, 11) and annotation data were archived using in-house annotation systems and several open-access databases (12, 14, 17, 19), whereas ribosomal RNA identities were confirmed using RNAmmer software (9).
The unclosed draft genome of B. squillarum M-6-3T is 3,191,479 bp long, with 72.8% G+C content. There are 2,935 putative coding sequences (CDSs), and the genome sequence contains 50 predicted tRNA genes and two predicted copies of the 5S, 16S, and 23S rRNA genes. Of the 2,935 genes identified, 2,145 CDSs were classified into 18 (J, K, L, D, O, M, N, P, T, C, G, E, F, H, I, Q, R, and S) functional COG categories. The unannotated genes may be assigned upon closure of the genome.
In comparison with the B. faecium genome, the genome of M-6-3T contains a higher percentage of genes associated with carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G), whereas there are no annotated genes associated with defense mechanisms (V), intracellular trafficking and secretion (U), and RNA processing and modification (A). Comparative tools available on the RAST sever (1) identified 2,060 genes shared between B. squillarum and B. faecium (the only publicly available genome corresponding to the genus Brachybacterium).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The sequence determined in this whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession no. AGBX00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, available under accession no. AGBX01000000.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (grant PJ008208), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
REFERENCES
- 1. Aziz R. K., et al. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Buczolits S., Schumann P., Weidler G., Radax C., Busse H. J. 2003. Brachybacterium muris sp. nov., isolated from the liver of a laboratory mouse strain. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53:1955–1960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chou J. H., et al. 2007. Brachybacterium phenoliresistens sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated coastal sand. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:2674–2679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Collins M. D., Brown J., Jones D. 1988. Brachybacterium faecium gen. nov., sp. nov., a coryneform bacterium from poultry deep litter. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 38:45–48 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Delcher A. L., Bratke K. A., Powers E. C., Salzberg S. L. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gontia I., Kavita K., Schmid M., Hartmann A., Jha B. 7 January 2011, posting date Brachybacterium saurashtrense sp. nov., a halotolerant root-associated bacterium with plant growth promoting potential. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.023176-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gvozdyak O. R., Nogina T. M., Schumann P. 1992. Taxonomic study of the genus Brachybacterium: Brachybacterium nesterenkovii sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42:74–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Heyrman J., Balcaen A., De Vos P., Schumann P., Swings J. 2002. Brachybacterium fresconis sp. nov. and Brachybacterium sacelli sp. nov., isolated from deteriorated parts of a medieval wall painting of the chapel of Castle Herberstein (Austria). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:1641–1646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lagesen K., et al. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:3100–3108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lapidus A., et al. 2009. Complete genome sequence of Brachybacterium faecium type strain (Schefferle 6-10). Stand. Genomic Sci. 1:3–11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lowe T. M., Eddy S. R. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955–964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Overbeek R., et al. 2005. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:5691–5702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Park S. K., et al. 2011. Brachybacterium squillarum sp. nov., isolated from salt-fermented seafood. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61:1118–1122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Pruitt K. D., Tatusova T., Klimke W., Maglott D. R. 2009. NCBI reference sequences: current status, policy and new initiatives. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D32–D36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Schubert K., et al. 1996. Two coryneform bacteria isolated from the surface of French Gruyère and Beaufort cheeses are new species of the genus Brachybacterium: Brachybacterium alimentarium sp. nov. and Brachybacterium tyrofermentans sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46:81–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Takeuchi M., Fang C.-X., Yokota A. 1995. Taxonomic study of the genus Brachybacterium: proposal of Brachybacterium conglomeratum sp. nov., nom. rev., Brachybacterium paraconglomeratum sp. nov., and Brachybacterium rhamnosum sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:160–168 [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tatusov R. L., Galperin M. Y., Natale D. A., Koonin E. V. 2000. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:33–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ventura M., et al. 2007. Genomics of Actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71:495–548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Yu C., Zavaljevski N., Desai V., Reifman J. 2009. Genome-wide enzyme annotation with precision control: catalytic families (CatFam) databases. Proteins 74:449–460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Zhang G., et al. 2007. Brachybacterium zhongshanense sp. nov., a cellulose-decomposing bacterium from sediment along the Qijiang River, Zhongshan City, China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57(Pt. 11):2519–2524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]