Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2011 Nov;85(22):12098–12099. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05944-11

Complete Genome Sequence of a Coxsackievirus A22 Strain in Hong Kong Reveals a Natural Intratypic Recombination Event

Cyril C Y Yip 1, Susanna K P Lau 1,2,3,4, Patrick C Y Woo 1,2,3,4, Kwok-Hung Chan 1, Kwok-Yung Yuen 1,2,3,4,*
PMCID: PMC3209295  PMID: 22021251

Abstract

Coxsackievirus A22 (CVA22) belongs to the species human enterovirus C in the Picornaviridae family. We report the first complete genome sequence of CVA22 with natural intratypic recombination between CVA22 prototype strain Chulman and CVA22 strain ban99-10427, identified in the stool of a patient in Hong Kong.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Human enterovirus species C (HEV-C) consists of 21 types, poliovirus (PV) 1 to 3, coxsackievirus A1 (CVA1), CVA11, CVA13, CVA17, CVA19 to CVA22, CVA24, EV-C95, EV-C96, EV-C99, EV-C102, EV-C104, EV-C105, EV-C109, EV-C113, and EV-C116, which cause diseases ranging from herpangina, acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis, and aseptic meningitis to acute flaccid paralysis (1; http://www.picornaviridae.com/enterovirus/hev-c/hev-c.htm). The prototype strain Chulman of CVA22 was identified in a stool sample from a patient without illness (10). Previous studies demonstrated that CVA22, which did not grow in various cell cultures, could be isolated in suckling mice (7, 11). To date, only 3 complete genome sequences of CVA22, including the prototype strain Chulman (New York, 1955), strain USA75-10624 (California, 1975), and strain ban99-10427 (Bangladesh, 1999), are available in GenBank. The role of CVA22 in disease is not fully understood.

We report a CVA22 strain, 438913, found in a patient in Hong Kong in 2010. Her stool sample was positive for enterovirus by PCR using primers targeting the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) as described elsewhere (13). Complete genome sequencing was performed according to our published strategies for positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses (3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). Sequence alignment was performed using ClustalX 2.1 (12). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using PhyML 3.0 (2). Bootscan and similarity plot analyses were performed using SimPlot 3.5.1 (8).

The genome of CVA22 strain 438913 is 7,404 bp in length, after excluding the polyadenylated tract, and the G+C content is 43.75%, which is similar to that of the other sequenced CVA22 strains. Its genome organization is similar to those of other reported enterovirus genomes, with the characteristic gene order 5′-VP4, VP2, VP3, VP1, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3Cpro, 3Dpol-3′. Both 5′ (712 bases) and 3′ (71 bases) ends of the genome contain UTRs. Downstream of the 5′ UTR, the genome contains a large open reading frame of 6,621 bases, which encodes potential polyprotein precursors of 2,206 amino acids. Phylogenetic analysis showed that CVA22 strain 438913 was clustered with CVA22 strain Chulman for the P1 region but with CVA22 strain ban99-10427 for the P2 and P3 regions. In the bootscan analysis, the result showed that from the 5′ end of the genome to position 3400, high bootstrap support for clustering between CVA22 strain Chulman and CVA22 strain 438913 was observed. From position 4000 to the 3′ end of the genome, high bootstrap support for clustering between CVA22 strain ban99-10427 and CVA22 strain 438913 was observed. Thus, recombination had possibly occurred between nucleotide positions 3400 and 4000, corresponding to the 2A-2B region. In the similarity plot analysis, CVA22 strain 438913 showed high sequence similarity (>79%) to CVA22 strain Chulman before position 3700 but shared higher similarity (>83%) with CVA22 strain ban99-10427 after position 3700. These findings revealed that a potential recombination site was located at 2A, which was shown to be a recombination hot spot in enteroviruses (9, 14). This is the first time that evidence for natural intratypic recombination is documented for CVA22.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The nucleotide sequence of the genome of the CVA22 recombinant strain 438913 has been lodged within the GenBank sequence database under accession no. JN542510.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the generous support of Carol Yu, Richard Yu, Hui Hoy, and Hui Ming in the genomic sequencing platform.

This work was partly supported by the Research Grant Council grant HKU7687/09 M and HKU7836/11 M, University Grant Council; Strategic Research Theme Fund, Committee for Research and Conference Grant and University Development Fund, The University of Hong Kong; the HKSAR Research Fund for the Control of Infectious Diseases of the Health, Welfare and Food Bureau; and Consultancy Service for Enhancing Laboratory Surveillance of Emerging Infectious Disease for the HKSAR Department of Health.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Brown B. A., et al. 2009. Resolving ambiguities in genetic typing of human enterovirus species C clinical isolates and identification of enterovirus 96, 99 and 102. J. Gen. Virol. 90: 1713–1723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Guindon S., Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 5: 696–704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lau S. K., et al. 2010. Ecoepidemiology and complete genome comparison of different strains of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related Rhinolophus bat coronavirus in China reveal bats as reservoir for acute, self-limiting infection that allows recombination events. J. Virol. 84: 2808–2819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lau S. K. P., et al. 2011. Complete genome analysis of three novel picornaviruses from diverse bat species. J. Virol. 85: 8819–8828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lau S. K., et al. 2005. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in Chinese horseshoe bats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102: 14040–14045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lau S. K., et al. 2007. Clinical features and complete genome characterization of a distinct human rhinovirus (HRV) genetic cluster, probably representing a previously undetected HRV species, HRV-C, associated with acute respiratory illness in children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 3655–3664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lipson S. M., Walderman R., Costello P., Szabo K. 1988. Sensitivity of rhabdomyosarcoma and guinea pig embryo cell cultures to field isolates of difficult-to-cultivate group A coxsackieviruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26: 1298–1303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lole K. S., et al. 1999. Full-length human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes from subtype C-infected seroconverters in India, with evidence of intersubtype recombination. J. Virol. 73: 152–160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lukashev A. N., et al. 2003. Recombination in circulating enteroviruses. J. Virol. 77: 10423–10431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pulli T., Koskimies P., Hyypia T. 1995. Molecular comparison of coxsackie A virus serotypes. Virology 212: 30–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sickles G. M., Mutterer M., Plager H. 1959. New types of Coxsackievirus, group A. Cytopathogenicity in tissue culture. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 102: 742–743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D. G. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 4876–4882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wisdom A., McWilliam Leitch E. C., Gaunt E., Harvala H., Simmonds P. 2009. Screening respiratory samples for detection of human rhinoviruses (HRVs) and enteroviruses: comprehensive VP4-VP2 typing reveals high incidence and genetic diversity of HRV species C. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3958–3967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wong S. S., Yip C. C., Lau S. K., Yuen K. Y. 2010. Human enterovirus 71 and hand, foot and mouth disease. Epidemiol. Infect. 138: 1071–1089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Woo P. C., et al. 2010. Comparative analysis of six genome sequences of three novel picornaviruses, turdiviruses 1, 2 and 3, in dead wild birds, and proposal of two novel genera, Orthoturdivirus and Paraturdivirus, in the family Picornaviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 91: 2433–2448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Woo P. C., et al. 2009. Comparative analysis of complete genome sequences of three avian coronaviruses reveals a novel group 3c coronavirus. J. Virol. 83: 908–917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Woo P. C., et al. 2006. Comparative analysis of 22 coronavirus HKU1 genomes reveals a novel genotype and evidence of natural recombination in coronavirus HKU1. J. Virol. 80: 7136–7145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Woo P. C., et al. 2007. Comparative analysis of 12 genomes of three novel group 2c and group 2d coronaviruses reveals unique group and subgroup features. J. Virol. 81: 1574–1585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yip C. C., et al. 2010. Emergence of enterovirus 71 “double-recombinant” strains belonging to a novel genotype D originating from southern China: first evidence for combination of intratypic and intertypic recombination events in EV71. Arch. Virol. 155: 1413–1424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES