Abstract
This paper describes methods for estimating thyroid doses to Ukrainian children who were subjects of an epidemiological study of prenatal exposure and presents the calculated doses. Participants were 2,582 mother-child pairs in which the mother had been pregnant at the time of the Chornobyl accident on April 26, 1986 or in the two-three months following when 131I in fallout was still present. Among these, 1,494 were categorized as “exposed”; a comparison group of 1,088 was considered “relatively unexposed.” Individual in utero thyroid dose estimates were found to range from less than 1 mGy to 3,200 mGy, with an arithmetic mean of 72 mGy. Thyroid doses varied primarily according to stage of pregnancy at the time of exposure and level of radioactive contamination at the location of residence. There was a marked difference between the dose distributions of the exposed and comparison groups, although nine children in the latter group had calculated doses in the range 100–200 mGy. For those children who were born after the accident and prior to the end of June 1986, postnatal thyroid doses were also estimated. About 7.7% (200) of the subjects received thyroid doses after birth that were at least 10% of their cumulative doses.
Keywords: in utero, dose, Chernobyl, dose estimation, thyroid, exposed, pregnancy
INTRODUCTION
As a result of the Chornobyl accident, which occurred in Ukraine on 26 April 1986, very large amounts of radioactive materials, including about 2 EBq of 131I, were released into the atmosphere (UNSCEAR 2000). Vast territories of Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine were contaminated by 131I, resulting in turn in the contamination of such important food products (especially for rural populations) as cows' milk and leafy vegetables. Thus, it is expected that many pregnant women who either did not know about the danger of contaminated food products, or knowingly continued, at least for some time, to consume them, exposed their unborn children to 131I.
Within the framework of the cooperation between the Scientific Center for Radiation Medicine (SCRM) of Ukraine and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the United States, Hatch et al. (2009) conducted a screening study of thyroid cancer and other thyroid diseases among individuals exposed in utero to 131I fallout from the Chornobyl accident.
The study subjects were divided into two sub-cohorts: “exposed” and “relatively unexposed” children. Children in the exposed sub-cohort, which is referred to as the “contaminated” group in the screening study (Hatch et al. 2009), were born between April 26, 1986 and March 31, 1987, meaning that their mothers were pregnant prior to or during the two-month period following the accident when the environmental concentrations of 131I were substantial. At the time of the accident (ATA) their mothers lived in some of the most contaminated territories** of Ukraine (parts of Chernihiv, Kyiv, Vinnytsia, and Zhytomyr oblasts). One group of 720 exposed children (denominated as L1-C) were born to mothers who in May or June, were subjected to a direct thyroid activity measurement. This group was expanded by adding children born during the same period whose mothers lived in contaminated settlements where there were women whose thyroid activities were measured, but who themselves did not have a direct thyroid measurement (group L2-C; 774 children).
The “relatively unexposed” group (L1-NC; 1088 children), referred to as the “comparison” group in the screening study (Hatch et al. 2009), were children, born in the same time interval, but whose mothers resided ATA in areas that were classified as “non-contaminated”. Neither those mothers nor other women in their villages were subjected to direct thyroid measurements.
Altogether, 1,494 mother-child pairs were included into the exposed sub-cohort and 1,088 were in the relatively unexposed sub-cohort, yielding a total of 2,582 subjects and 2554 mothers (including 28 pairs of siblings). The residential locations of the mother-child pairs ATA are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Places of residence ATA of the mothers of the exposed and relatively unexposed children. Levels of the estimated 131I contamination levels are also indicated.
The purpose of this paper is to describe how individual thyroid doses were estimated for all subjects and to present the results that were obtained. Most subjects were exposed only in utero; however, those born before July 1986 also received thyroid doses as infants. Only thyroid doses received from intakes of 131I have been taken into account. Other pathways such as external or internal irradiation from radionuclides other than 131I have not been included in the dose calculation: it is estimated that their contributions to the thyroid dose would be a few percent of the dose from 131I intakes (UNSCEAR, 2000).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The estimations of the in utero and neonatal thyroid doses are based on:
-
-
an ecological model of thyroid dose calculation that can be applied to all Ukrainian subjects, whether children or adults, and that takes into account the level of information available for the individual (Likhtarev et al. 2005; Likhtarev et al. 2006);
-
-
a model for calculation of the thyroid dose received in utero (Berkovski 2004);
-
-
responses provided during personal interviews of the 2,554 mothers of the subjects: the information collected concerns the whereabouts of the mothers between the times of conception and of birth, the intakes of milk and leafy vegetables, and, if that was the case, intake of stable iodine to block their thyroids;
-
-
results of direct thyroid measurements for the mothers of subjects or for women who lived in the same village
The methods used to estimate thyroid doses prior to and, when appropriate, after birth, are presented in the following sections.
Estimation of the thyroid doses during gestation
The general scheme of calculation of in utero doses for the members of groups L1-C, L2-C, and L1-NC is illustrated in Figure 2. The figure indicates similarities in the calculation procedure, but also shows that there are differences in the dose calculations for the three groups. The procedures are discussed below.
Figure 2.
Structure of the in utero dose calculation for the three groups of subjects
Thyroid exposure of fetus
The estimation of the thyroid dose for the cohort subject k due to in utero exposure has been carried out in two steps. In a first step, the ecological-questionnaire thyroid dose, , has been calculated for all subjects, using the estimated 131I activity intakes by the mothers of the subjects and values of fetal (F) thyroid dose coefficients provided by ICRP (2001) for acute maternal intake at conception and at specific times after conception. In a second step, the ecological-questionnaire thyroid doses have been calibrated using scaling factors that take into account the results of the direct thyroid measurements performed in the areas of residence of the mothers of the subjects; the results of the calibration process are the individual fetal thyroid doses, . There are no differences in the calculation of questionnaire individualized ecological doses, , based upon the responses of the mothers of the subjects in the L1-C, L2-C and L1-NC groups. The principal difference in the estimation of the individual fetal thyroid doses, , for the three groups is in the scaling process.
Estimation of the ecological-questionnaire thyroid dose,_
For an 131I intake by the mother of subject k occurring on day n after the beginning of fallout, , the partial ecological-questionnaire thyroid dose, , has been calculated as the product of and of the fetal thyroid dose per unit intake of 131I by the mother, hT (τ), where τ, in weeks, is the stage of pregnancy of the mother on day n after the beginning of fallout, taken to be 26 April 1986 for all Ukrainian locations. The entire ecological-questionnaire thyroid dose, , has been calculated as the sum of the partial ecological-questionnaire thyroid doses, , over all days n of 131I intake. The maximum value for n, denoted as N, is 66, corresponding to the number of days between 26 April and 30 June 1986. By the latter date, much less than 1% of the 131I fallout was still present in the environment and, therefore, in milk or leafy vegetables. However, for the estimation of the thyroid dose during gestation, daily intakes are only considered until the date of birth of the child. Therefore, N = 66 if the date of birth occurs after 30 June 1986 and N<66 if the date of birth occurs earlier.
The calculation process can be mathematically expressed as follows:
| (1) |
with
| (2) |
Daily intakes of 131I by the mother
The 131I activity intake by the mother of cohort's subject k results primarily from the consumption of milk and leafy vegetables, with a generally small contribution from inhalation of contaminated air. Daily intakes have been calculated for each day n after the beginning of fallout. The daily intakes by ingestion are the products of (1) the concentrations of 131I in milk and leafy vegetables (Bq L−1 and Bq kg−1, respectively) in the mother's diet on day n, and (2) the corresponding consumption rates (L d−1 and kg d−1). The daily intakes by inhalation depend on the air concentration on day n (Bq m−3) and on the breathing rates (m3 d−1). The concentrations of 131I in milk, leafy vegetables, and air are based on the 131I ground deposition at the settlement of residence and are calculated using the ecological model and parameters described in Likhtarov et al. (2005) and in Likhtarev et al. (2006). The consumption rates of milk and leafy vegetables are obtained from the responses provided by the mother during her personal interview, while the breathing rate for female adults was taken to be 21.6 m3 d−1 (NRSU 2003; ICRP 1994). The partial daily intakes of 131I from consumption of milk, consumption of leafy vegetables, and inhalation are summed for each day n after the beginning of fallout to obtain the total daily intakes, denoted as .
Estimation of the fetal thyroid dose per unit intake of 131I by the mother, hT (τ)
The values of the fetal thyroid dose per unit intake of 131I by the mother, hT (τ), have been derived from ICRP (2001). In that report, thyroid dose coefficients, expressed in Sv Bq−1, are calculated using a multi-compartment model of iodine metabolism and are given for gestational ages, τ, of 5, 10, 15, 25 and 35 weeks at the time of intake. Because the radiation-weighting factor for radiations emitted by 131I is equal to 1 (ICRP 2007), the fetal thyroid doses per unit intake, expressed in Gy Bq−1, are numerically equivalent to the thyroid dose coefficients. For the purposes of this article, values of the fetal thyroid dose per unit intake of 131I for gestational ages different from those given above have been calculated using the same multi-compartment model of iodine metabolism which is presented in Figure 3 (Berkovski 1999a, 1999b; ICRP 2001). Results are provided in Table 1 for ingestion intakes. Dose coefficients for I2 are estimated to be about 10% lower than those for ingestion. Estimated values for inhalation intakes of CH3I and particles are lower. The actual airborne iodine species mixture is not known. In our calculations, the dose coefficients for ingestion are used to calculate doses from inhalation as well. Because the intakes of 131I by inhalation are much smaller than those by ingestion, this approximation results in a very small overestimation of the thyroid doses.
Figure 3.
Model of iodine biokinetics during pregnancy (ICRP 2001, Berkovski 1999a)
Table 1.
Fetal thyroid dose (Gy) per 1 Bq of 131I ingestion intake by mother as a function of the gestational age
| Stage of pregnancy (weeks) at the time of 131I intake |
hT(τ), Gy Bq−1 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Values used for the dose calculation | ICRP (2001) | |
| 5 | 2.2 10−10 | 2.2 10−10 |
| 10 | 3.2 10−9 | 3.2 10−9 |
| 12 | 9.8 10−8 | |
| 15 | 2.4 10−7 | 2.4 10−7 |
| 18 | 3.6 10−7 | |
| 21 | 4.4 10−7 | |
| 25 | 6.8 10−7 | 6.8 10−7 |
| 27 | 7.2 10−7 | |
| 30 | 8.7 10−7 | |
| 35 | 1.1 10−6 | 1.1 10−6 |
Estimation of the individual fetal thyroid doses,
The estimate of the individual dose received by the fetus, , is derived from the ecological dose, , using a scaling factor based on the measurements that are as much as possible representative of the dose, so that:
| (3) |
The values of the scaling factor, , are obtained differently according to the group of subjects that is considered:
| (4) |
Estimation of the scaling factor for members of group L1-C
The scaling factor for a member of group L1-C is an individual scaling factor for the mother of subject k who had a direct thyroid measurement in May–June of 1986. The scaling factor is the ratio
| (5) |
where is the 131I thyroid activity directly measured in the mother's thyroid and is the calculated thyroid activity on the day of measurement t = tmeasur due to intakes of 131I by the mother via all pathways. Time t (d) is counted from April 26, 1986.
According to the one-compartment biokinetic model for iodine metabolism of ICRP Publication 30 (ICRP 1988), the value of can be written as:
| (6) |
where d−1 is the effective rate constant for the elimination of 131I from the mother's thyroid; - is the fractional uptake of 131I by the thyroid of the mother. According to ICRP Publications 30 and 67 (ICRP 1988, 1993), , that is, 30% of the 131I intake is immediately transferred from blood to the thyroid irrespectively of age and gender.
The value of that is used in the multi-compartment model of ICRP (2001) is not given explicitly, but it can be derived from the fact that the calculated time-integrated 131I activities in the thyroid must be the same, whether the model in ICRP (2001) or in ICRP Publication 30 is used, for a given intake of 131I. For a unit acute intake of 131I, this is expressed as:
| (7) |
which results in:
| (8) |
In equations (7) and (8), (t) is the 131I thyroid activity calculated according to the multi-compartment biokinetic model for iodine metabolism in the mother's body (ICRP 2001), and is the value implicitly used in that model for the fractional uptake of 131I by the thyroid of the mother. According to equation (8), the value of is equal to 0.39*, if for 131I is taken to be 0.095 d−1. This value of 0.39 has been used for the calculation of individual scaling factors in equations (4) and (5) as well as for the calculation of group average scaling factors and .
Estimation of the scaling factor for members of group L2-C
The scaling factor for a member of group L2-C, whose mother resided in settlement j ATA, is the arithmetic mean of individual scaling factors estimated for the adult women with direct thyroid measurements in the settlement j. Default assumptions about the residential histories and dietary habits of the adult women with direct thyroid measurement were used in the assessment of their instrumental thyroid doses (Likhtarov et al. 2005).
Estimation of the scaling factor for members of group L1-NC
The scaling factor for a member of group L1-NC, whose mother resided in settlement j ATA, reflects the local average 137Cs deposition density (σj,Cs, kBq m−2) measured for settlement j. Likhtarov et al. (2005) assumed that personal decisions about dietary intakes were related to information about local contamination levels, which at that time were expressed in terms of the local 137Cs deposition density. Likhtarov et al. (2005) analyzed the relationship between measured thyroid activities and 137Cs deposition density and estimated a scaling factor as a function of two best-fit parameters, B and β. In the context of this report, that scaling factor is expressed as
| (9) |
The parameters B and β were estimated separately for rural and urban settlements. Best-fit values of B for females in urban areas were 0.34 with a geometric standard deviation of 1.5; for females in rural villages, the corresponding values were 0.47 (geometric mean) and 1.1 (geometric standard deviation). Best-fit values of β for females in urban and rural areas were 0.58±0.11 (mean±standard deviation) and 0.36±0.10, respectively (Likhtarov et al. 2005).
Estimation of the thyroid doses received after birth
Because the thyroid uptake of 131I from breast feeding is higher than the uptake of the fetus at the end of the in utero period, the ratio of the thyroid doses received by the child and the mother keeps increasing after birth (Zvonova and Balonov 1993). It is therefore important to also estimate the thyroid doses received after birth. The calculation included several successive steps. The first task was to estimate the variation with time of the 131I intake by the mother using both the ecological model described by Likhtarov et al. (2005) and the responses provided by the mother regarding her consumption of milk and leafy vegetables and her relocation history. In a second step, the concentration of 131I in the mother's breast milk was estimated. Simon et al. (2002) recommended a transfer coefficient Kmother-baby of 0.37 d L−1, which was used to make these estimates.
In the third and final step, the thyroid dose to the infant was estimated. Among the 329 cohort members who were born between 26 April and 30 June 1986, 291 of them were breastfed. The breast milk consumption rate wbaby was taken to be 0.8 L d−1 and it It was assumed that there was no other source of 131I intake for the child. Therefore the thyroid dose received by a breastfed child born between 26 April and 30 June 1986 is:
| (10) |
where is the assumed thyroid mass for breast-fed infants ; α is the energy absorbed in the thyroid following the radioactive decay of 131I (α=3.20 10−14 J Bq−1); d−1 - is the effective rate constant for the elimination of 131I from the newborn's thyroid (ICRP 56; 1989) and - is the fractional uptake of 131I by the thyroid of the newborn (ICRP 67; 1993).
The total questionnaire-individualized ecological dose estimate for the baby is the summation of the daily doses received by consumption of mother's milk:
| (11) |
where nb is equal to 1 for the day of birth and equal to Nb on 30 June 1986. The individual dose to the baby subject k is scaled in the same manner as the fetal dose [equation (3)], using scaling factors that depend upon the group to which subject k belongs [equation (4)].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Responses to the personal interviews
Personal interviews were conducted with the 2,554 mothers of all subjects to obtain information on their pregnancy, as well as on their residence history and dietary habits during the two months following the Chernobyl accident. The following paragraphs summarize the information gathered from the 2,554 mothers for the 2,582 subjects (there were 28 pairs of siblings).
The places of residence of exposed and relatively unexposed subjects at the time of the accident are shown in Figure 1. There is a clear geographical separation between the places of residence of the exposed and relatively unexposed children. The distributions of subjects in each group according to type of settlement (urban or rural) are given in Table 2. About 76% of the subjects resided in rural areas ATA.
Table 2.
Distribution of the subjects at the time of the accident according to type of settlement
| Settlement | Number of subjects |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Exposed | Relatively unexposed | Total | |
| Rural areas | 1205 | 768 | 1973 |
| Urban areas | 289 | 320 | 609 |
| All locations | 1494 | 1,088 | 2,582 |
The age distributions of the mothers of the cohort members ATA, broken down for each group and for all subjects together, are shown in Table 3. Most (89.3%) of the mothers were in the age range from 18 to 33 years; 52 were 16–17 years of age, and 12 were older than 40. The age distributions for the two groups are similar.
Table 3.
Distribution of exposed and relatively unexposed subjects according to the age of their mothers at the time of the accident (ATA)
| Mother's age (y) ATA | Number of subjects |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Exposed | Relatively unexposed | Total | |
| 16 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| 17 | 22 | 18 | 40 |
| 18 | 57 | 53 | 110 |
| 19 | 89 | 80 | 169 |
| 20 | 128 | 89 | 217 |
| 21 | 122 | 85 | 207 |
| 22 | 104 | 91 | 195 |
| 23 | 105 | 77 | 182 |
| 24 | 102 | 71 | 173 |
| 25 | 101 | 71 | 172 |
| 26 | 102 | 68 | 170 |
| 27 | 83 | 61 | 144 |
| 28 | 88 | 49 | 137 |
| 29 | 76 | 53 | 129 |
| 30 | 60 | 39 | 99 |
| 31 | 53 | 33 | 86 |
| 32 | 37 | 34 | 71 |
| 33 | 23 | 22 | 45 |
| 34 | 30 | 17 | 47 |
| 35 | 28 | 22 | 50 |
| 36 | 17 | 11 | 28 |
| 37 | 13 | 8 | 21 |
| 38 | 14 | 7 | 21 |
| 39 | 9 | 7 | 16 |
| 40 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 41 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 42 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 43 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 44 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 45 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Unknown | 14 | 5 | 19 |
| Total | 1494 | 1,088 | 2,582 |
The distributions of the subjects according to stage of pregnancy of the mothers ATA are shown in Table 4. The numbers per month, which are relatively low for the early stages of pregnancy, reach a plateau after the third month. It is worth noting that almost 10% of the subjects were conceived during the two months following the accident.
Table 4.
Distribution of the number of subjects according to the stage of pregnancy of their mothers at the time of the accident (ATA)
| Stage of pregnancy, (days) ATA | Number of subjects |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Exposed | Relatively unexposed | Total | |
| <=0 | 96 | 137 | 233 |
| 1–30 | 88 | 72 | 160 |
| 31–60 | 108 | 74 | 182 |
| 61–90 | 125 | 83 | 208 |
| 91–120 | 181 | 111 | 292 |
| 121–150 | 211 | 85 | 296 |
| 151–180 | 227 | 107 | 334 |
| 181–210 | 188 | 131 | 319 |
| 211–240 | 174 | 141 | 315 |
| >240 | 96 | 147 | 243 |
Information about the numbers of relocations reported by the mothers of subjects in each of the two groups is presented in Table 5. Most subjects (81% among the exposed and 83% among the unexposed) did not change their place of residence during the time period when 131I was present in the environment (April–June of 1986). About 16% of the subjects moved 1–2 times during this period and about 2% moved more than 2 times.
Table 5.
Number of relocations in May–June of 1986 reported by the mothers of the subjects.
| Number of relocations | Number of subjects |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Exposed | Relatively unexposed | Total | |
| 0 | 1204 | 906 | 2110 |
| 1 | 167 | 62 | 229 |
| 2 | 85 | 106 | 191 |
| 3 | 21 | 7 | 28 |
| 4 | 11 | 4 | 15 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 7 | 1 | - | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 9 | - | - | - |
| 10 | 1 | - | 1 |
| Totals | 1494 | 1,088 | 2582 |
The reported individual daily consumptions of milk and leafy vegetables by the mothers of the subjects in April-June of 1986 vary in a rather wide interval, with 18% of women consuming more than 1 liter of milk daily, while about 12% of women answered that they did not consume milk at all (Table 6). According to personal interview 35 mothers did not consume milk or leafy vegetables. For those mothers, the thyroid doses were only due to inhalation.
Table 6.
Daily consumption of milk and leafy vegetables reported by the mothers of the subjects in the three groups.
| A. Consumption of milk | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily milk consumption (L) | Percentage of subjects |
||
| Urban areas | Rural areas | All areas | |
| No consumption | 12.0 | 13.3 | 12.3 |
| < 0.5 | 45.4 | 59.6 | 48.7 |
| 0.5–1 | 17.7 | 14.0 | 16.9 |
| 1–1.5 | 17.3 | 7.1 | 14.9 |
| 1.5–2 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.1 |
| 2–2.5 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| 2.5–3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| ≥ 3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| No definite amount | 4.1 | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
|
| |||
| Mean values | |||
|
| |||
| Mean for all (L) | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Mean for milk consumers (L) | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| B. Consumption of leafy vegetables | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily consumption of leafy vegetables (g) | Percentage of subjects |
||
| Urban areas | Rural areas | All areas | |
| No consumption | 10.0 | 13.6 | 10.9 |
| < 10 | 23.7 | 31.5 | 25.5 |
| 10–20 | 17.9 | 11.3 | 16.4 |
| 20–30 | 11.0 | 8.7 | 10.5 |
| 30–40 | 13.8 | 12.0 | 13.4 |
| 40–50 | 11.4 | 12.6 | 11.7 |
| 50–100 | 10.2 | 7.1 | 9.5 |
| ≥ 100 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| No definite amount | 1.2 | 2.3 | 1.4 |
| Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
|
| |||
| Mean values | |||
|
| |||
| Mean for all (g) | 24 | 28 | 27 |
| Mean for consumers of leafy vegetables (g) | 27 | 31 | 30 |
The average daily consumptions, broken down according to type of settlement (urban or rural), are presented in Table 6. In rural settlements, the average daily consumptions of milk and leafy vegetables were 0.45 L and 28 g respectively. In urban areas, the average daily consumption of milk was 0.29 L and the average daily consumption of leafy vegetables was 24 g. These results are close to the reference daily consumption of milk and leafy vegetables used for the adult inhabitants of rural and urban settlements in the “ecological” modeling of thyroidal 131I activity: 0.35 L of milk and 25 g of leafy vegetables for the rural settlements and 0.22 L of milk and 19 g of leafy vegetables for the urban settlements.
Estimates of the thyroid dose received by the thyroid of the fetus
The results of the thyroid dose estimation are shown in Tables 7 and 8. Table 7 shows the distributions of doses received by the subjects in the exposed and relatively unexposed categories. The distributions differ markedly, with more than 97% of the relatively unexposed group having estimated doses lower than 50 mGy, while only about 57% of estimated doses to members of the exposed group were that low. The mean dose to subjects in the exposed group was about 120 mGy. The mean thyroid dose for all subjects was 72 mGy, the values for exposed and for relatively unexposed group being 120 and 10 mGy respectively. Individual thyroid dose estimates range from less than 1 mGy to 3,200 mGy.
Table 7.
Distributions of thyroid doses (mGy) for the exposed and relatively unexposed cohort members.
| Thyroid dose, range (mGy) | Exposed subjects | Relatively unexposed subjects | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percent of total | Number | Percent of total | Number | Percent of total | |
| 0–20 | 565 | 37.8 | 932 | 85.7 | 1497 | 61.75 |
| 20–50 | 285 | 19.1 | 126 | 11.6 | 411 | 15.35 |
| 50–100 | 221 | 14.8 | 21 | 1.9 | 242 | 8.35 |
| 100–200 | 188 | 12.6 | 9 | 0.8 | 197 | 6.70 |
| 200–500 | 160 | 10.7 | - | - | 160 | 5.35 |
| 500–1000 | 50 | 3.3 | - | - | 50 | 1.65 |
| >1000 | 25 | 1.7 | - | - | 25 | 0.85 |
| Total | 1,494 | 100 | 1,088 | 100 | 2582 | 100 |
Table 8.
Distribution of the mean thyroid doses of the subjects according to stage of pregnancy
| Stage of pregnancy (d) ATA | Mean dose (mGy) for group members |
|
|---|---|---|
| Exposed | Relatively unexposed | |
| <=0 – 30 | 0 | 0 |
| 31–60 | 1 | 0 |
| 61–90 | 14 | 1 |
| 91–120 | 67 | 5 |
| 121–150 | 100 | 8 |
| 151–180 | 155 | 9 |
| 181–210 | 176 | 14 |
| 211–240 | 252 | 14 |
| >240 | 308 | 29 |
As expected, most of the doses of individuals in the relatively unexposed or “comparison” group are small (<100 mGy), but dose estimates for nine subjects are in the 100–200 mGy range. One reason for such high doses is that, according to their questionnaires, some of the mothers spent some time in April-June in settlements with relatively high contamination. In the low-contaminated areas there are several locations with relatively substantial levels of deposition (for example, the settlements Bakhmach and Baturin of Chernihiv oblast where the 137Cs deposition densities are 14 and 44 kBq m−2, respectively). The residence of mothers in these settlements during the late stage of pregnancy (or after birth in late April or May), as well as high consumption rates of milk and/or leafy vegetables, resulted in elevated thyroid doses to those children of the “comparison” group.
The breakdown of the thyroid doses as a function of the stage of pregnancy (Table 8) shows, for the 2 groups of subjects, that the dose increases substantially with the stage of pregnancy. The difference between the first and second trimester reflects the development of the organ, which does not become active until 9 – 12 weeks after conception.
Estimation of the thyroid doses received after birth
The thyroid doses received after birth (Dpn) were calculated for all cohort members and compared with the doses received while in utero (Df). Results of the comparison are presented in Table 9. For 91% of the subjects, either the fetal or the postnatal thyroid doses were very small. For the remainder of the cohort, i.e., 352 subjects, the ratio of the doses received after birth to the total dose (Df+Dpn) ranged from 0.01 to 1. Among these subjects with non-negligible in-utero or postnatal exposures the dose received after birth was found to be less than 10% of the total dose for 152 subjects and greater than the fetal dose for 102 subjects. When the subjects with negligible in-utero exposure are included, it is estimated that 219 subjects (8.5%) received thyroid doses after birth that were at least 10% of their cumulative doses.
Table 9.
Distribution of postnatal thyroid doses according to the relative magnitude of thyroid doses received while in utero (Df) and postpartum (Dpn)
| Exposed subjects | Relatively unexposed subjects | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | Postnatal dose interval, mGy |
Number of subjects | Postnatal dose interval, mGy |
|||
| min | max | min | max | |||
| Negligible in-utero exposure (Df ≈0; Dpn >0; birth soon after the accident) | 11 | 24 | 997 | 8 | 7 | 68 |
| Negligible in-utero and postnatal exposures (Df ≈0; Dpn ≈0; conception time after March 1986) | 142 | < 1 | < 1 | 195 | < 1 | < 1 |
| Negligible postnatal exposure (contribution in total exposure < 1%; birth after May 1986) | 1209 | < 1 | 9 | 665 | < 1 | 2 |
| Substantial in-utero and postnatal exposure (contribution in total exposure 1% – 100%) | 132 | < 1 | 1600 | 220 | < 1 | 148 |
| Including cases of contribution in total exposure: | ||||||
| 1% – 10% | 73 | < 1 | 137 | 79 | <1 | 14 |
| 10% – 25% | 20 | 3 | 231 | 35 | <1 | 12 |
| 25% – 50% | 11 | 7 | 221 | 32 | <1 | 22 |
| 50% – 75% | 17 | 15 | 685 | 25 | 1 | 33 |
| 75% – 100% | 11 | 5 | 1600 | 49 | 2 | 148 |
| Total | 1494 | < 1 | 1600 | 1088 | <1 | 148 |
Comparison of the thyroid doses received by the mother and by the child
In Table 10 the ratios of thyroid doses received by children and thyroid doses received by their mothers are shown. As is clear from the table the child's thyroid doses are less than 1% of mothers' doses if the stage of pregnancy at the time of the accident was less than 60 days. This ratio increases rapidly as the stage of pregnancy ATA increases. The thyroid doses of subjects who were exposed in utero during the last trimester of pregnancy are significantly greater than the thyroid doses of their mothers.
Table 10.
Ratios of thyroid doses received by the children in utero (Df) and in utero and after birth (Df+Dpn) to the thyroid doses received by mothers (Dmoth)
| Stage of pregnancy ATA (days) | Exposed group | Relatively unexposed group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF/Dmoth | (Df+ Dpn)/Dmoth | Df/Dmoth | (Df+Dpn)/Dmoth | |
| 31–60 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| 61–90 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| 91–120 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.44 |
| 121–150 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| 151–180 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| 181–210 | 1.26 | 1.29 | 1.34 | 1.35 |
| 211–240 | 1.54 | 1.57 | 1.53 | 1.71 |
| >240 | 1.40 | 2.24 | 1.03 | 2.65 |
Uncertainties
The uncertainties attached to the thyroid dose estimates are admittedly large, but very difficult to quantify. The main sources of uncertainty are expected to be related to:
-
–
the transfer coefficient hT (τ) from 131I intakes by the mother to the thyroid dose received by the child. This uncertainty is important for all subjects, but is larger for those whose in utero exposure occurred during the early stages of fetal thyroid development (Berkovski 2004).
-
–
the determination of the gestational age τ at the time of the accident; it varies from one subject to another according to the knowledge of the mother about the beginning of her pregnancy.
Additional sources of uncertainty are related to the application of estimated scaling factors for adjustment of thyroid activities calculated for mothers of subjects in groups L2-C and L1-NC. These uncertainties concern:
-
–
whether the village mean scaling factors employed for mothers in contaminated areas but without direct thyroid measurements (group L2-C) are representative for subjects in that group. This uncertainty is shared, at least at the village level and perhaps by all members of group L2-C.
-
–
the estimation of the scaling factors for the “non-contaminated areas” that apply to subjects in group L1-NC. The scaling factors are more uncertain in locales that are characterized by smaller numbers of radiation measurements.
The estimation of the uncertainties related to the in utero thyroid dose estimates will be the topic of a separate paper.
CONCLUSIONS
Doses were estimated for 2,582 Ukrainian children who were exposed in utero to 131I following the accident at the Chornobyl power station in 1986. There were two groups of “exposed” children (1,494 in all) and one group of 1,088 “relatively unexposed” children. Thyroid dose estimates for all children were made using an ecological model that relied on information (residence locations, gestational age, food consumption patterns, iodine prophylaxis, etc) provided by their mothers during personal interviews.
At the time of the accident, mothers of the first two groups of children resided in areas with substantial amounts of contamination, while mothers of children in the relatively unexposed category resided in areas with little post-accident radionuclide deposition. Distributions of estimated doses generally reflected that difference; mean doses to the exposed infants were ~120 mGy, more than ten times higher than the mean dose (~10 mGy) for relatively unexposed. More than 97% of the latter group received thyroid doses less than 50 mGy; only about 57% of the exposed group received doses in that range. Nine subjects in the relatively unexposed group (0.8%) had thyroid dose estimates between 100 and 200 mGy; these higher doses were due to reported periods of residence in more contaminated areas after the accident. On the other hand, estimated thyroid doses for 28.3% of the exposed group exceeded 100 mGy. The overall range of doses was from less than 1 mGy to 3.2 Gy. The lowest thyroid doses were estimated for subjects whose estimated fetal ages were less than 90 d at the time of the accident. Thyroid dose estimates generally increased with the stage of development, but also depended upon individual circumstances reported by the mothers.
The main sources of uncertainty in these thyroid dose estimates have been identified but have not been quantified. Included are the estimates of fetal age at the time of the accident and the related issue of thyroidal uptake of 131I, particularly in the early stages of fetal thyroid development. The uncertainty in the applied dose scaling factors also remains to be quantified.
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the U.S. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services.
Footnotes
The contaminated territories in Ukraine were defined for administrative purposes as areas with 137Cs deposition densities greater than 37 kBq m−2, that is, >1 Ci km−2 in units used at the time. Other parts of the country have been called “non-contaminated” in that context.
The differences in the values of the fractional uptake of 131I by the thyroid of the mother relate to different levels of stable iodine in the diet used in the two ICRP models: the uptake by the thyroid is higher when the intake with diet is lower. In ICRP Publication 88 (ICRP 2001) the iodine intake with diet is 150 μg d−1 whereas in ICRP Publication 30 (ICRP 1988) the stable iodine intake with diet is 200 μg d−1.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- Berkovski V. Radiation and Thyroid Cancer. World Scientific Publishing; 1999a. Radioiodine biokinetics in the mother and fetus. Part 1. Pregnant woman; pp. 319–325. Publication No. EUR 18552EN of the European Commission. [Google Scholar]
- Berkovski V. Radiation and Thyroid Cancer. World Scientific Publishing; 1999b. Radioiodine biokinetics in the mother and fetus. Part 2. Fetus; pp. 327–332. Publication No. EUR 18552EN of the European Commission. [Google Scholar]
- Hatch M, Brenner A, Bogdanova T, Derevyanko A, Kuptsova N, Likhtarev I, Bouville A, Tereshchenko V, Kovgan L, Shpak V, Ostroumova E, Greenebaum E, Zablotska L, Ron E, Tronko M. A screening study of thyroid cancer and other thyroid diseases among individuals exposed in utero to iodine-131 from Chornobyl fallout. J Clin Endocrin Metab. 2009;94(3):899–906. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) Limits for Intakes of Radionuclides by Workers. ICRP Publication 30. Annals of the ICRP. 1988;19(4) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) Age-dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides: Part 1. ICRP Publication 56. Annals of the ICRP. 1989;20(2) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 66. Annals of the ICRP. 1994;24(1–3) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) Age-Dependent Doses from Intakes of Radionuclides: Part 2. ICRP Publication 67. Annals of the ICRP. 1993;23(3–4) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) Doses to the Embryo and Fetus from Intakes of Radionuclides by the Mother. Publication 88. Annals of the ICRP. 2001;31(1–3) doi: 10.1016/S0146-6453(01)00022-7. Corrected version, May 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(2–4) doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Likhtarov I, Kovgan L, Vavilov S, Chepurny M, Bouville A, Luckyanov N, Jacob P, Voillequé P, Voigt G. Post-Chornobyl thyroid cancers in Ukraine: Report 1: Estimation of thyroid doses. Radiat Res. 2005;163:125–136. doi: 10.1667/rr3291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Likhtarev I, Bouville A, Kovgan L, Luckyanov N, Voillequé P. Questionnaire- and measurement-based individual thyroid doses in Ukraine resulting from the Chornobyl nuclear reactor accident. Radiat Res. 2006;166:271–286. doi: 10.1667/RR3545.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Standards of Radiation Safety of Ukraine (NRSU-2003) Kiev: 2003. in Russian. [Google Scholar]
- Simon SL, Luckyanov N, Bouville A, VanMiddlesworth L, Weinstock RM. Transfer of 131I into human breast milk and recommendations of transfer coefficient values useful for radiological dose assessments. Health Phys. 2002;82:796–804. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200206000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) Annex J: Exposures and effects of the Chernobyl accident. United Nations; New York: 2000. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. [Google Scholar]
- Zvonova IA, Balonov MI. Radioiodine dosimetry and prediction of consequences of thyroid exposure of the Russian population following the Chernobyl accident. In: Merwin Steven E., Balonov Michail I., editors. The Chernobyl Papers. Vol. I: Doses to the Soviet Population and Early Health Effects Studies. Research Enterprises Inc.; Richland, WA: 1993. pp. 71–125. [Google Scholar]



