Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2011 Jan 26;51(3):326–331. doi: 10.1007/s12088-011-0074-9

Copper, Zinc-Superoxide Dismutase from Clinically Isolated Escherichia coli: Cloning, Analysis of sodC and Its Possible Role in Pathogenicity

M K Sanjay 1, S M Srideshikan 2, V L Vanishree 2, M S Usha 1, A Philip Raj 1, S M Gaddad 1, C T Shivannavar 1,✉
PMCID: PMC3209913  PMID: 22754011

Abstract

Superoxide dismutase has been discovered within the periplasm of several Gram-negative pathogens. We studied the Cu,Zn-SOD enzyme in Escherichia coli isolated from clinical samples (stool samples) collected from patients suffering from diarrhea. Antibiogram studies of the isolates were carried out to determine the sensitive and resistant strains. The metal co-factor present in the enzyme was confirmed by running samples in native gels and inhibiting with 2 mM potassium cyanide. A 519 bp sodC gene was amplified from resistant and sensitive strains of Escherichia coli. Cloning and sequencing of the sodC gene indicated variation in the protein and amino acid sequences of sensitive and resistant isolates. The presence of sodC in highly resistant Escherichia coli isolates from diarrheal patients indicates that sodC may play role in enhancing the pathogenicity by protecting cells from exogenous sources of superoxide, such as the oxidative burst of phagocytes. The presence of SodC could be one of the factors for bacterial virulence.

Keywords: Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli, Drug resistance, Superoxide dismutase, sodC, Pathogenicity

Introduction

Superoxide dismutases (SODs) are present in most bacteria, catalyzing the conversion of oxygen radical (O2−) into hydrogen peroxide and oxygen [1], resulting in the removal of free radicals generated during the reduction of molecular oxygen. Three types of SODs are found in bacteria. Mn-SOD and Fe-SOD encoded by sodA and sodB, respectively are located in the cytoplasm where they catalyse dismutation of O2− during aerobic metabolism. Copper and zinc (Cu, Zn)-SOD encoded by sodC has been identified in the periplasm of a wide range of Gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli [2], Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella choleraesuis and Salmonella dublin [3, 4], Haemophilus species [5], Brucella abortus [6]. Cu, Zn-SOD protect bacteria from toxic oxygen-free radicals generated outside the cell or in the periplasm itself, since superoxide is unable to cross membrane [7]. Therefore, Cu, Zn-SOD has been proposed to be a virulence factor in bacteria potentially exposed to toxic free radicals produced by the host in response to bacterial infection. Experiments have demonstrated the role of bacterial Cu, Zn-SOD in the virulence and pathogenicity of microorganisms [8]. Human pathogens like Salmonella, Haemophilus influenzae, H. parainfluenzae and Legionella pneumophila [9, 10] demonstrate the presence of sodC gene, while it is hardly detectable in non-invasive bacteria [11, 12]. In the present study we report the presence of sodC gene from Escherichia coli both pathogenic and nonpathogenic, collected from patients with suspected cases of diarrhea by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [13], highlighting differences in the protein and nucleotide sequence of isolates and also suggesting a possibility of SodC as a factor for bacterial virulence.

Materials and Methods

Collection of Samples

Clinical samples (stool samples from patients with suspected cases of diarrhea) were collected using precautionary measures from the patients attending Hospitals and Diagnostic centres in Gulbarga city, Karnataka, India (K·B.N. Hospital, Basaveshwara Hospital, Pooja Diagnostics and Hyderabad–Karnataka Diagnostics and Medical Research Institute Pvt. Ltd.). The collected stool samples were screened for the presence of Gram-negative bacteria using specific media viz. MacConkey and Eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar.

Characterization and Antibiogram of Isolated Bacteria

The isolated bacteria were identified based on the cultural, morphological and biochemical characteristics [14]. The standard strain used was Escherichia coli 2622 procured from IMTECH-Chandigarh, India. Antibiogram of the isolated and identified E. coli was carried out by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method [15]. For all the isolates and reference strain, Muller Hinton agar plates were used. Commercially available antibiotic- discs procured from Span Diagnostics Ltd. were used. Organisms were classified as sensitive (S), and resistant (R) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [16] guidelines (formerly NCCLS [17]).

Screening of Escherichia coli for Cu, Zn-Superoxide Dismutase

Preparation of Periplasmic Extracts

Escherichia coli isolates were grown overnight in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth (10 mg/ml tryptone, 5 mg/ml yeast extract, 10 mg/ml NaCl, pH 7.2). Periplasmic extracts were prepared from bacterial cultures by the lysozyme-EDTA method described by Battistoni and Rotilio [12]. 250 ml of 30 h culture was centrifuged (Sigma) at 8000 rpm for 15 min. The dry pellet obtained was re-suspended in 5 ml of the isotonic solution comprising Tris–HCl (30 mM; pH 8.0), Sucrose (20% wt./vol.), EDTA (1 mM). To this, 2 ml of lysozyme solution (10 mg/ml) was added. The tube was mixed by inversion, incubated for 10 min on ice and centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted and stored at −20°C for later analysis.

Visualization of SODs in PAGE

Superoxide dismutase was detected by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), (7.5%) according to Laemmli [18]. The stacking gel used was 5% pH 6.8, 7.5% separating gel pH 8.8 using the buffer system of Davis [19]. SOD activity in PAGE gels was visualized by modification of the Beauchamp and Fridovich [20] method as described by Steinman [21]. In a two-step staining procedure, the gels were incubated in 2.45 mM Nitroblue tetrazolium chloride [(NBT) (in dark)] for 20 min and in a solution containing 28 μM riboflavin and 28 mM N,N,N′,N′ –tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) in a 36 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) for 10 min (in dark). When the gels were pre-treated with 2 mM potassium cyanide, Cu, Zn-SOD was inactivated. Fe-SOD was inactivated by hydrogen peroxide, but Mn-SOD was resistant to both [22, 23]. The achromatic band indicating the zone of SOD activity was developed by illumination (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Achromatic bands against the dark background indicate the presence of SOD enzymes in periplasmic extracts from isolates: Lane 1E. coli 130, Lane 2E. coli 131, Lane 3E. coli 140, Lane 4E. coli 2622, Lanes 5,6,7,8 enzyme extracts of above strains treated with 2 mM KCN indicating the inhibition of Cu, Zn-SOD activity

Amplification of sodC from E. coli

In vitro amplification of sodC from isolated and reference strains of E. coli was carried out by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using genomic DNA as template and oligonucleotides, designed based on the existing sodC sequence from database (NCBI). The oligonucleotide primers (Sigma–Aldrich) used were Ecolifor 5′-ATGAAACGTTTTAGTCTGGC-3′(Forward Primer) and Ecolirev 5′-CTTAATTACACCACAGGCATAGC -3′(Reverse Primer). PCR (PTC-150 Minicycler-MJ Research Inc., USA.) was carried out using 50–80 ng of genomic DNA as template. The reaction mixture comprised 200 μM dNTP, 200 nM primers (Sigma–Aldrich), 2% Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and 1.5 U XT-5 polymerase (Bangalore Genie) in 1x reaction buffer. The XT-5 polymerase is a mixture of Taq DNA polymerase and proof reading polymerase ensuring no mutation in the PCR amplicon. In the final extension step 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase was added to ensure addition of 3′ overhang dA, so that the amplicon could be cloned into T/A based cloning vector pTZ57R/T. Samples were processed through 30 cycles of initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 50°C for 30 s, elongation at 72°C for 30 s, final elongation at 72°C for 10 min. sodC amplicons were purified by using the GenElute Gel Extraction Kit (Sigma–Aldrich) as per manufacturer’s protocol.

Cloning of sodC

Ligation of sodC into Cloning Vector pTZ57R/T

The purified sodC was ligated into cloning vector pTZ57R/T (InsTAclone PCR Cloning kit, MBI Fermentas) as per manufacturer’s protocol. The ligation reaction mixture consisting of Insert DNA, vector DNA, 2x ligation buffer, T4 DNA ligase and nuclease free water were vortexed briefly and centrifuged for 3–5 s, incubated at 22°C for 16 h.

Transformation of sodC Cloned pTZ57R into E. coli DH5α

The TransformAid Bacterial Transformation Kit (MBI, Fermentas) was used for transforming 10 μl of ligation mixture into competent E. coli DH5α cells, spread plated on LB solid medium containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin and incubated at 37°C for 12 h. The recombinant clones were analysed for the presence and orientation of the DNA insert using restriction digestion analysis. The plasmid DNA was isolated from an overnight bacterial culture using a convenient plasmid Miniprep method. The GeneElute Plasmid Miniprep kit (Sigma–Aldrich) was used as per manufacturer’s protocol.

Sequencing of the Clones

After confirming the sodC clones of E. coli (pTZ57R 2622, pTZ57R 130, pTZ57R 131, pTZ57R 140) by restriction digestion analysis, they were submitted for sequencing (MWG Biotech Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India). Multiple alignments of nucleotide and protein sequences of E. coli 2622, E. coli 130, E. coli 131, E. coli 140 were carried out with CLUSTAL W program.

Results

The antibiogram of isolated E. coli using 10 antibiotics was carried out and the results showed that reference strain E. coli 2622 and isolate E. coli 140 is resistant to 10 antibiotics compared to isolate E. coli 130 which is resistant to 7 antibiotics and E. coli 131 which is resistant to only 1 antibiotic. Multi-drug resistant and sensitive strains from the antibiogram studies were screened for Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase by PAGE. Amplification of sodC gene of E. coli isolates and reference strain all resulted in 519 bp (Fig. 2). The sodC gene cloned into pTZ57R/T vector was transformed into E. coli DH5α. The transformants were selected on LB agar medium containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin. Positive transformants were selected by isolating plasmids and restriction enzyme analysis. The positive transformants of E. coli 2622 reference strain was labeled as pTZ57R2622 and similarly for isolates as pTZ57R130, pTZ57R131 and pTZ57R140. Sequencing of the sodC cloned pTZ57R2622 resulted in 519 nucleotide base pairs, which corresponded to the sodC gene sequence of E. coli from NCBI GenBank database on nucleotide-nucleotide BLAST analysis. Putative protein translation of the sequenced fragments was carried out with EXPASY. The nucleotide sequences of all the four E. coli viz. E. coli 2622 (reference strain), E. coli 130, 131 and 140 are deposited in NCBI GenBank and the accession numbers are EU447295, EU447292, EU447293 and EU447294, respectively. The isolated E. coli strain numbers 130, 131 and 140 yielded nucleotide sequence of 519 bp. The putative translated protein had a length of 171 amino acids for all three strains. The multiple alignment of amino acid sequences of SodCs of E. coli 130, E. coli 131, E. coli 140 revealed 100% sequence identity with the E. coli SodC protein sequence available in the NCBI GenBank database (Figs. 3, 4). The nucleotide sequence homology of the isolated strains with that of the reference strain E. coli 2622 showed variation at position 327, cytosine (C) is replaced by thymine (T), was observed in all the three isolates when compared to the reference strain. Similarly at position 171, adenine (A) is replaced by guanine (G) in E. coli 130 strain. In E. coli strain 140 SodC sequence showed 2 variations at positions 365 and 474, in former guanine (G) is replaced by adenine (A) and at 474 position, adenine (A) is replaced by cytosine (C). Both the isolated E. coli strain numbers 130, 131 showed no mutations at protein level, however, few base differences at nucleotide sequence level (due to degeneracy of codon). On the other hand isolate E. coli 140 showed mutations in amino acid sequence too, at position 122, glycine (G) is replaced by aspartate (D), and at position 158 lysine (K) is replaced by N (asparagine). The total number of metal binding amino acid residues (histidine; H and aspartate; D) in E. coli 2622 reference strain and isolates E. coli 130 and 131 were found to be 18 but in E. coli 140, 19 amino acid residues are present, though there is mutation at two amino acid residues of SodC sequence of E. coli 140 isolate, indicating there is no change in the SOD activity and in the functional group of the enzymes.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Ethidium bromide stained 1% agarose gel showing ~520 bp PCR product of sodC gene. Lane 1 Negative control: without template, Lane 2sodC amplicon of E. coli 2622, Lane 3sodC amplicon of E. coli 130, Lane 4sodC amplicon of E. coli 131, Lane 5sodC amplicon of E. coli 140, Lane 6 DNA ladder

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Multiple alignment of sodC nucleotide sequences among E. coli isolates and E. coli reference strain

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Multiple alignment of amino acid sequences of SodC (translated) among E. coli isolates and E. coli reference strain

Discussion

It has been shown that Cu, Zn-SOD enzyme plays a protective role against superoxide generated by macrophages. sodC genes are present in most of the pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria. Here in our study we have reported the difference in sequence pattern of sensitive and resistant Escherichia coli. The antibiotic sensitivity of strains E. coli 2622, E. coli 130, E. coli 131, E. coli 140 indicated that E. coli 2622, E. coli 130 and E. coli 140 are highly resistant to different antibiotics when compared to E. coli 131 which is sensitive to antibiotics. The sodC sequence of Escherichia coli was amplified using specific sodC primers. With these primers we amplified the sodC gene (519 bp) from the genomic DNA of reference strain E. coli 2622 and clinical isolates E. coli 130,131,140. The sodC sequence from all three isolates revealed that there is no variation in the sequence length of sodC; it supports the earlier report by Imlay and Imlay [2]. The E. coli Cu, Zn-SOD enzyme like other bacterial Cu, Zn-SODs is secreted into the periplasm. Because superoxide cannot cross membranes, this localization indicates that the enzyme has evolved to defend periplasmic biomolecules against an extracytoplasmic superoxide source. Sequence homology among the nucleotide sequences of three E. coli isolates and one reference E. coli 2622 strain revealed that all the three E. coli isolate sodC sequences showed the nucleotide variation at four places with that of reference E. coli 2622 sodC gene sequence. Highest changes in the nucleotide sequences were observed in E. coli 140 when compared to the sodC sequence of E. coli reference strain 2622. Overall 7 histidines and 11 aspartate were present in the SodC of all E. coli isolates except in E. coli 140 isolate. The above data suggests that isolate E. coli 140 differs from other isolates and the reference strain E. coli 2622 in their nucleotide and amino acid sequences. One of the reasons for this phenotypic change in the SodC of E. coli 140 could be the resistance to multi drugs. Such studies have been reported earlier by Zhang et al. [24], who observed the changes in SOD gene sequence of isoniazid resistant M. tuberculosis strain when compared with that of SodC of susceptible strain. This suggests that SodC may act as virulence factors of pathogenic bacteria. sodC genes had previously been reported in few other bacteria [2, 3, 25], among them B. abortus was not only a pathogen but also a facultative intracellular parasite which survives and multiplies in an intracellular environment within host phagocytic cells. Similar to other pathogenic microorganisms, E. coli having the sodC gene is found to have significant intracellular survival which suggests that bacteria encounter an oxidative stress upon invasion of epithelial cells and hence overproduction of Cu, Zn-SOD provides a defense mechanism [26]. Within phagocytes, organisms must protect from the respiratory burst host defense reaction, either by inhibiting its initiation or by resisting the bactericidal action of superoxide and other free radicals produced. A periplasmic SOD, appropriately located to dismute superoxide generated exogenously in this way, can be considered as an enhancer of bacterial virulence. In our study the genotypic variation in protein sequences at the active sites of resistant E. coli strain 140 containing sodC when compared with the sensitive strains indicates that the presence of SodC in multidrug resistant isolates may enhance the pathogenicity of the organism due to the ability of SodC in the periplasm to neutralize free radicals generated by the respiratory burst of host phagocytes hence can be considered as one of the factors leading to virulence.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. C. Jayabaskaran, Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India for providing facilities in his laboratory to carry out Molecular biology work. We also thank the co-operation extended by doctors and staff of Microbiology Division of Basaveshwara hospital, K.B.N. hospital, Pooja Diagnostics and Hyderabad-Karnataka Diagnostics and Medical Research Institute Pvt. Ltd., Gulbarga in providing clinical samples.

References

  • 1.McCord JM, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase. An enzymatic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein) J Biol Chem. 1969;244:6049–6055. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Imlay KRC, Imlay JA. Cloning and analysis of sodC, encoding copper, zinc superoxide dismutase of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:2564–2571. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.9.2564-2571.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Canvin J, Langford PR, Wilks KE, Kroll JS. Identification of sodC encoding periplasmic [Cu, Zn]-superoxide dismutase in Salmonella. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;136:215–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08052.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Farrant JL, Sansone A, Canvin JR, Pallen MJ, Langford PR, Wallis TS, Dougan G, Kroll JS. Bacterial copper-and zinc-cofactored superoxide dismutase contributes to the pathogenesis of systemic salmonellosis. Mol Microbiol. 1997;25:785–796. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5151877.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Langford PR, Loynds BM, Kroll JS. Copper-Zinc superoxide dismutase in Haemophilus species. J Gen Microbiol. 1992;138:517–522. doi: 10.1099/00221287-138-3-517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stabel TJ, Sha Z, Mayfield JE. Periplasmic location of Brucella abortus Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase. Vet Microbiol. 1994;38:307–314. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(94)90149-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hassan HM, Fridovich I. Paraquat and Escherichia coli. Mechanism of production of extracellular superoxide radical. J Biol Chem. 1979;254:10846–10852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fang FC, DeGroote MA, Foster JW, Bäumler AJ, Ochsner U, Testerman T, Bearson S, Giárd J-C, Xu Y, Campbell G, Laessig T. Virulent Salmonella typhimurium has two periplasmic Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:7502–7507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kroll JS, Langford PR, Loynds BM. Cu Zn superoxide dismutase of H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:7449–7457. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.23.7449-7457.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sadosky AB, Wilson JW, Steinman HM, Shuman HA. The iron superoxide dismutase of Legionella pneumophila is essential for viability. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:3790–3799. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.12.3790-3799.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Battistoni A, Donnarumma G, Greco R, Valenti P, Rotilio G. Over expression of a hydrogen peroxide resistant periplasmic Cu Zn superoxide dismutase protects E. coli from macrophage killing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;243:803–807. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Battistoni A, Rotilio G. Isolation of an active and heat-stable monomeric form of Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase from the periplasmic space of Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1995;374:199–202. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01106-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 3. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor laboratory press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.George MG, Julia AB, Timothy GL. Taxonomic outline of the prokaryotes. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. 2. New York: Springer; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J of Clin Path. 1966;45:493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2005) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests; 8th edn. p. M02-A8
  • 17.Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; thirteenth information supplement. Wayne: NCCLS document M100–S13; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Davis BJ. Disc electrophoresis. II. Method and applications to human serum proteins. Ann NY Acad Sci USA. 1964;121:404–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb14213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Beauchamp CO, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1971;44:276–287. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Steinman HM. Bacteriocuprein superoxide dismutases in pseudomonads. J Bacteriol. 1985;162:1255–1260. doi: 10.1128/jb.162.3.1255-1260.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Crapo JD, McCord JM, Fridovich I. Preparation and assay of superoxide dismutases. Method Enzymol. 1978;53:382–393. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(78)53044-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dunlap PV, Steinman HW. Strain variation in bacteriocuprein superoxide dismutase from symbiotic Photobacterium leiognathi. J Bacteriol. 1986;165:393–398. doi: 10.1128/jb.165.2.393-398.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang Y, Garcia MJ, Lathigra R, Allen B, Moreno C, Embden JDA, Young D. Alterations in the superoxide dismutase gene of an isoniazid-resistant strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 1992;60:2160–2165. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.6.2160-2165.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Beck B, Tabatabai LB, Mayfield JE. A protein isolated from Brucella abortus is a Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase. Biochemistry. 1990;29:372–376. doi: 10.1021/bi00454a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Battistoni A, Pacello F, Folcarelli S, Ajello M, Donnarumma G, Greco R, Ammendolia MG, Touati D, Rotilio G, Valenti P. Increased expression of periplasmic Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase enhances survival of Escherichia coli invasive strains within nonphagocytic cells. Infect Immuno. 2000;68(1):30–37. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.1.30-37.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES