Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2011 Jan 30;51(4):531–535. doi: 10.1007/s12088-011-0153-y

Characterization and Phylogenetic Diversity of Carboxymethyl Cellulase Producing Bacillus Species from a Landfill Ecosystem

Suresh Korpole 1,, Rashmi Sharma 1, Dipti Verma 1
PMCID: PMC3209942  PMID: 23024419

Abstract

Total population of cellulose degrading bacteria was studied in a landfill ecosystem as a part of microbial diversity study. Samples were obtained from 3 and 5 feet depth of a local landfill being operated for past 10 years. Among many isolates, 22 bacterial strains were selected based on their capability to decompose carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). These isolates were cultivated on agar medium with CMC as the carbon source. All isolates were Gram positive, endospore forming and alkalophilic bacteria with optimum growth pH 9–10. They were grouped based on the phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characters and representative strains of different groups along with high carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) producing strains were included for further characterization. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene indicated that these strains belong to different species of the genus Bacillus. Maximum CMCase activity of 4.8 U/ml at 50°C was obtained by strain LFC15. Results in the present study indicated the potential of waste land ecosystems such as landfill are potential source for isolation of industrially important microorganisms.

Keywords: Landfill ecosystem, Bacillus, CMCase, 16S rRNA gene phylogeny


In recent years there is an increased interest in microbial diversity studies as little prokaryotic diversity is known from the total estimated 4–6 × 1030 [1]. Among different ecosystems wasteland have become a subject of great interest in recent past [24]. Landfills being the waste disposal area are considered to be more important due to their unique composition. Composition of landfill is differed with the kind of wastage added including grass, leaves and food waste. A typical landfill is constitute of approximately paper 40%, yard waste 17%, food waste 14%, glass 7%, metals 8%, plastics 8% and other refuse 12% [5]. However, Indian landfills differ in composition and the major ingredients found were plant litter, polythene and building waste material. Plant litter being major ingredient, is constituted of carbohydrate polymers such as cellulose and hemicellulose. Waste land soils were found to contain cellulolytic bacteria belonging to genera Bacillus, Cellulomonas, Cytophaga, Pseudomonas, Sporocytophaga and Streptomyces that were been isolated [6]. These cellulolytic bacteria had been reported under different conditions and isolated with potential activity on different forms of cellulose [79]. Although landfill contains different forms of cellulose, the microbial diversity of cellulolytic bacteria present in landfill ecosystem has not been much studied. In the present study we have made an attempt with an objective of quantifying cultivable cellulolytic bacteria and their phylogenetic diversity.

Samples were collected from a local landfill ecosystem from 3 and 5 feet subsurface environment. These were analyzed for aerobic and anaerobic carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) producing bacteria using CMC agar containing 0.5%, caboxymethyl cellulose; 0.1%, NaNO3; 0.1%, K2HPO4; 0.1%, KCl; 0.05%, MgSO4·7H2O; 0.05%, yeast extract; 1.5% agar, pH 8.0 and for anaerobic cultivation 0.01% of resazurin was added in addition to the above and medium was boiled, purging with nitrogen gas. Colonies were screened with Congo red for CMCase production [10] and positive colonies were selected and preserved at −70°C. Strains were grown in nutrient broth with pH 8.0 to observe morphological features and biochemical tests [11]. Sodium carbonate and bicarbonate solutions were used to adjust pH of the medium to check the growth of strains in alkaline conditions. For fatty acid methyl esters extraction and analysis [12], cells were grown on Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA) medium at 30°C. Analysis was performed according to the instructions of the Microbial Identification (MIDI) system [13]. PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was done using universal forward and reverse primers [14]. The sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and an automatic DNA sequencer (ABI PRISM model 3700). These sequences were compared with reference sequences available at NCBI GeneBank and aligned for phylogenetic analysis. The pair-wise evolutionary distances were computed using the DNADIST program with the Kimura 2-parameter model [15]. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using TREECON (version 1.3b) [16]. The stability among the clades of a phylogenetic tree was assessed by taking 1,000 replicates. All sequences in the present study were submitted to NCBI GeneBank and the accession numbers are as follows: LFC2 (FN397904); LFC3 (FN397905); LFC9 (FN397906); LFC12 (FN397907); LFC15 (FN397908); LFC18 (FN397909). Enzyme production was done using isolation medium with 0.1% of peptone and 5% inoculum was used for enzyme production. A culture grown for 48 h was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant obtained was used as crude enzyme source. Activity was estimated as the amount of reducing sugar released using DNS method [17]. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that released 1 μmol of glucose. To determine the temperature effect, crude CMCase enzyme was incubated at various temperatures range between 37 and 55°C along with substrate.

The total bacterial count was calculated in terms of number of CFU obtained and it was 5.4 × 106 and 6.4 × 105 cfu/g for 3 and 5 feet samples respectively. However, it was 11.5 × 104 and 20 × 104 cfu/g on CMC agar. Among the colonies obtained, 7 colonies from 3 feet samples and 15 colonies from 5 feet samples were selected. These 22 isolates were screened with Cong red for their CMCase enzyme activity. The results of phenotypic analysis indicated that all isolates were Gram-positive and sporulated with few differences in their characters (Table 1). Isolates from 5 feet sample were found to grow well at pH 9.0–10.0 than from 3 feet samples (Fig. 1). This may be due to adaptation of isolates to alkaline conditions that prevailed at 5 feet depth. All isolates found to be facultative anaerobic, their phenotypic characters and capability of spore formation affiliated them to genus Bacillus. These are found to be ubiquitous in nature as they are capable of surviving under stress conditions [18, 19] and had been observed in soils and wastelands [20, 21]. Isolates that exhibited identical phenotypic properties were grouped together and representative of each group was analyzed for their membrane fatty acid composition. Although they had ISOC15:0 and AIC15:0 as major fatty acids (Table 2), which are considered as FAME signatures of the genus Bacillus, they differed with nearest relatives in composition. Upon grouping the isolates further based on FAME analysis, six isolates including representative isolate from each group including high CMCase producers were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and enzyme studies. These six isolates exhibited optimum CMCase activity between 37 and 45°C, however, highest activity of 4.8 U/ml was observed at 50°C for the strain LFC15 (Fig. 2). Isolates form 5 feet samples showed enzyme activity at increased temperature.

Table 1.

Phenotypic characteristics of the landfill isolates from 3 feet and 5 feet samples

Property Isolate
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Catalase + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Citrate utilization + + + + + + + + + + +
Gelatin hydrolysis + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Esculin hydrolysis + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Starch hydrolysis + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Casein hydrolysis (+) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Urea hydrolysis
Indole
Methyl red + + + + + + (+) + + + + + + + +
Voges Proskaur
Nitrate reduction + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Growth at pH
 8.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
 9.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
 10.0 + + (+) + + + + (+) + + + + + + + + +
 11.0 + + + + + + + + + + + +
Temperature (°C)
 42 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
 45 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
 50 (+) + (+) + +
NaCl (%)
 2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
 4 + + (+) + + (+) + (+) (+) + + + + + + + (+) + + + +
 6 + + (+) (+) + + + + + (+) (+) (+) (+) (+) + +
 8 + + (+) (+) + + + + + (+) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+)
 10 (+) (+) + + (+) + + (+)

+, positive; −, negative; (+), weak positive

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Growth of Bacillus isolates from landfill ecosystem at various pH conditions. All isolates were grown in CMC medium at 30°C temperature and shaking at 150 rpm for 24 h. Growth was measured spectophotometrically at 600 nm. Strains LFC2 (filled diamond), LFC3 (filled small square), LFC9 (filled triangle), LFC12 (filled large square), LFC15 (six spoked asterisk), LFC18 (filled circle)

Table 2.

Total membrane fatty acid composition of the isolates

14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0
Iso 14:0 Iso Anteiso Iso 16:0 Iso Anteiso
LFC2 1.31 1.61 57.52 28.46 1.93 2.48 3.37 2.54
LFC3 5.15 2.86 34.57 38.19 1.77 7.73 2.33 3.37
LFC4 4.96 3.87 31.35 33.26 6.28 5.08 8.74 0.87
LFC7 4.59 2.04 39.67 37.31 1.35 4.23 2.65 3.50
LFC9 3.93 2.17 36.97 45.82 0.80 3.27 1.33 2.19
LFC10 20.46 41.62 7.36 13.94 16.62
LFC11 4.97 2.28 39.02 42.30 0.79 3.09 1.46 2.08
LFC12 19.50 39.19 5.35 5.26 13.99 16.71
LFC13 1.65 18.07 37.89 1.78 13.72 13.25 13.63
LFC15 19.32 38.53 5.39 5.38 13.77 17.60
LFC16 3.52 2.46 22.93 28.18 8.20 6.10 3.02 12.15
LFC18 3.51 40.64 41.33 6.97 3.25 4.31
LFC19 5.50 41.45 26.72 8.24 4.59 3.95 9.55
LFC20 1.46 2.01 53.97 22.96 3.04 6.01 7.00 3.54
LFC22 7.35 48.24 37.22 7.19

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effect of temperature on crude CMCase activity produced by isolates. Strains LFC2 (filled diamond), LFC3 (filled small square), LFC9 (filled triangle), LFC12 (filled large square), LFC15 (six spoked asterisk), LFC18 (filled circle)

The selected isolates were sequenced approximately 800 bp and further, BLAST analysis revealed that they belongs to different species of genus Bacillus as many of them showed >99% similarity. Phylogenetic analysis assigned all isolates to various species of the genus Bacillus. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree indicated that isolates formed coherent clusters with the reference strains that were exhibited maximum similarity at 16S rRNA gene sequence (Fig. 3). Strain LFC15 had low similarity of 97.7% and exhibited differences in phenotypic properties with B. pumilus, indicating its probability of being novel species. Bacillus species were known to produce CMCase and reported to produce in 72 h of incubation under optimal conditions [22, 23]. In contrast to this, in the present study our isolates produce the enzyme within 24–48 h of incubation in production medium with high activity at increased temperature. These findings indicate that ecosystems such as landfill are potential source for isolating industrially useful microbes.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Neighbour-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene (approx 800 bp) sequences showing the phylogenetic relationship between isolates and various species of genus Bacillus

Acknowledgments

We thank Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and DBT, Government of India for financial assistance. This is communication number 030/2009 of the Institute of Microbial Technology.

References

  • 1.Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6578–6583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang Y, Ogawa M, Fukuda K, Miyamoto H, Taniguchi H. Isolation and identification of mycobacteria from soils at an illegal dumping site and landfills in Japan. Microbiol Immunol. 2006;50:513–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2006.tb03821.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yassin AF, Chen WM, Hupfer H, Siering C, Kroppenstedt RM, Arun AB, Lai WA, Shen FT, Rekha PD, Young CC. Lysobacter defluvii sp. nov., isolated from municipal solid waste. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:1131–1136. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64966-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ghosh A, Maity B, Chakrabarti K, Chattopadhyay D. Bacterial diversity of east Calcutta wet land area: possible identification of potential bacterial population for different biotechnological uses. Microb Ecol. 2008;54:452–459. doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9244-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.United States Environmental Protection Agency (1990) Characterization of municipal solid waste in the United States: 1990 update. EPA report no. 530-SW-90-042. US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service
  • 6.Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66:506–577. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ruijssenaars HJ, Hartmans S. Plate screening methods for the detection of polysaccharide-producing microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;55:143–149. doi: 10.1007/s002530000477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ulrich A, Klimke G, Wirth S. Diversity and activity of cellulose-decomposing bacteria isolated from a sandy and a loamy soil after long-term manure application. Microb Ecol. 2008;55:512–522. doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9296-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wirth S, Ulrich A. Cellulose-degrading potentials and phylogenetic classification of carboxymethyl-cellulose decomposing bacteria isolated from soil. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2002;25:584–591. doi: 10.1078/07232020260517724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Teather RM, Wood PJ. Use of Congo red–polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;43:777–780. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.4.777-780.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lanyi B. Classical and rapid identification methods for medically important bacteria. Methods Microbiol. 1987;19:1–67. doi: 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70407-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sato NS, Murata N. Membrane lipids. Methods Enzymol. 1988;167:251–259. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(88)67027-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sasser M (1990) Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. MIDI technical note 101. MIDI Inc, Newark
  • 14.Pandey KK, Mayilraj S, Chakrabarti T. Pseudomonas indica sp. nov., a novel butane-utilizing species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1559–1567. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.01943-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peer Y, Wachter R. Construction of evolutionary distance trees with TREECON for Windows: accounting for variation in nucleotide substitution rate among sites. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997;13:227–230. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/13.3.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31:426–428. doi: 10.1021/ac60147a030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Billi D, Potts M. Life and death of dried prokaryotes. Res Microbiol. 2002;153:7–12. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(01)01279-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nicholson WL. Roles of Bacillus endospores in the environment. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002;59:410–416. doi: 10.1007/s00018-002-8433-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Garbeva P, Veen JA, ElsasI JD. Predominant Bacillus sp. in agricultural soil under different management regimes detected via PCR-DGGE. Microb Ecol. 2003;45:302–316. doi: 10.1007/s00248-002-2034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mizuno K, Fukuda K, Fujii A, Shiraishi A, Takahashi K, Taniguchi H. Bacillus species predominated in an incineration ash layer at a landfill. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;72:531–539. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ito S, Shikata S, Ozaki K, Okamoto S, Inque S, Takel A, Ohata Y-I, Satoh T. Alkaline cellulase for laundry detergents; production by Bacillus sp. KSM-635 and enzyme properties. Agric Biol Chem. 1989;52:1275–1281. doi: 10.1271/bbb1961.53.1275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kawai S, Okoshi H, Ozaki S, Shikata S, Ara K, Ito S. Neutrophilic Bacillus strain, KSM-522 that produces an alkaline carboxymethyl cellulase. Agric Biol Chem. 1988;52:1425–1431. doi: 10.1271/bbb1961.52.1425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES