Abstract
The effect of dichloromethane (DCM) and ethyl acetate (EA) extract of a cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa was evaluated against unicellular cyanobacteria and the phytopathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Fractionation of the filtrate showed the presence of five spots of different Rf values on silica gel coated plates indicating the presence of a number of compounds in the extract. A marked reduction in growth (52%) of the fungus was recorded on the plates supplemented with cyanobacterial extract, indicating the involvement of anti-fungal metabolite(s). The extract did not show any negative influence on seed germination and growth of seedlings of wheat, rice and mung, emphasizing the suitability of the compound for use in agriculture.
Keywords: Cyanobacteria, Microcystis, Fungicidal, Rhizoctonia
Introduction
Cyanobacteria constitute an ancient, diverse and widely distributed group of oxygen evolving photosynthetic prokaryotes having properties in common to both higher plants and bacteria. They show remarkable metabolic flexibility and biochemical diversity and successfully colonize almost all kinds of terrestrial and aquatic habitats. They are equipped with effective protective mechanisms against different biotic stresses and have remarkable adaptability to varying environmental conditions. Under favorable nutritional and environmental conditions, they proliferate into cyanobacterial blooms, which are becoming more common with the increasing eutrophication of fresh water bodies. The concern over the outcome of cyanobacterial blooms has increased during the past decades with increasing information on the detrimental power of the toxins produced by these organisms [1–3]. They are known to be a rich source of secondary metabolites. Such secondary metabolites produced by cyanobacteria are of special interest, not only as disease causing agents but also as bioactive molecules in applied and basic studies. Globally, they have been frequently associated with various kinds of water management problems, including many cases of human poisoning, animal sickness and death due to ingestion of water contaminated with toxic cyanobacteria [2, 4, 5]. Ecologically, these antimicrobial compounds of cyanobacteria are important as they may play a critical role in the allelopathic interactions among microorganisms in any ecological community/niche. Only recently the chemical, pharmaceutical, immuno-modulatory, bio-regulatory and therapeutic potential of these exciting bio-molecules have been recognized internationally [6, 7]. Scientists all over the world are now looking for the commercial exploitation of these bioactive molecules with novel chemical and molecular structures [8].
The present research work is being undertaken to bring to light the utility of the bioactive molecules produced by the cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa, which is notorious in creating nuisance in ponds/water bodies and the possible use of the toxic compounds produced by Microcystis aeruginosa as a biocontrol agent against phytopathogenic fungi.
Materials and Methods
Organism and Growth Condition
Microcystisaeruginosa used in this investigation was isolated from Laxmikund pond, Varanasi [9]. The strain was cultivated and maintained in the laboratory in Parker’s medium [10]. Two unicellular cyanobacterial strains (Synechococcus sp., Synechocystis sp.) used as test organisms were maintained in N+ BG-11 medium [11]. The cultures were incubated at 27 ± 1°C, 3,000-lux light intensity and 16:8 L/D cycles. The fungal strains (Pythium debaryanum, Rhizoctonia solani and Rhizoctonia bataticola) used for evaluating fungicidal activity were obtained from Division of Agricultural Chemicals, IARI, New Delhi. The cultures were maintained on potato dextrose agar medium. The fungal strains were incubated at 28 ± 2°C in a BOD incubator.
Mass Culture of Microcystis aeruginosa
The axenised culture of the cyanobacterium was set for mass multiplication in 3 l flasks and incubated under optimal growth promoting conditions for the cyanobacterium [10]. The cultures were harvested in exponential phase of growth by pelleting at high speed (15,000 rpm) for 20 min. The cell free extracts were pooled for the extraction of secondary metabolites.
Extraction of Secondary Compounds
The culture filtrates were partitioned with non-polar, polar and highly polar solvents (n-Hexane, Dichloromethane and Ethyl acetate) sequentially to extract all the compounds present in culture filtrates. The organic phase was then separated from the aqueous phase and dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. The extracts were then subjected to rotary evaporation under pressure. The solid extract was dissolved in acetone and stored at 4°C until further analyses.
Biocidal Activity of the Compounds
The bioactivity of the cyanobacterial filtrate, crude extracts and the partially purified compounds as tested on the lawn of two unicellular cyanobacteria (Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp.) and three phytopathogenic fungus by disc diffusion technique [9]. The diameter of the inhibition zone was taken as the measure of extent of toxicity. The percent inhibition of the fungal strain was also calculated by food poisoning technique and the colony size of the fungal strain was measured.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
The inhibitory effect of the concentrated extracts was examined in agar-based media using 96 well ELISA plates [12]. The extracts obtained after rotary evaporation of the extracts were weighed and dissolved in desired volume of acetone and a series of different dilutions were prepared. Five replicates of each concentration were put on a sterilized medium (BG-11/PDA) placed on the wells of ELISA plates. Each well was inoculated with test organism (cyanobacterium/fungus) and incubated under suitable conditions along with suitable controls.
Effect of Cyanobacterial Extract on Important Crop Plants
The effect of crude extract of the cyanobacterium was tested on seed germination, length of coleoptile and radicle of wheat (Triticum aestivum var HD2689), Rice (Oryza sativa var Pusa Basmati 1) and Mung (Vigna mungo var Pusa Ratna). Seeds were surface sterilized with 0.1% mercuric chloride for 30 min and thereafter washed thoroughly with sterile water. They were imbibed overnight in sterile water in dark at room temperature and kept for germination on water agar (2% agar in distilled water containing MIC levels of cyanobacterial extracts). The experiments were conducted in triplicate with ten seeds per plate for each crop. The plates were incubated in dark at 25 ± 2°C. Percentage germination of the seeds was calculated after 24 h of incubation while coleoptile, radicle length was measured after 96 h of incubation.
Chromatographic Fractionation of the Compounds
Thin layer chromatography of the sample solution was done to separate the compounds present in the extracts of Microcystis aeruginosa. Silica gel coated plates (0.15 mm thick), activated in a hot air oven at 120°C were applied for TLC. The crude extract dissolved in acetone was spotted on the TLC plates and then passed through different solvent system(s) to achieve maximum separation of the compounds present in the extract.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was employed using Microsoft Excel. At least three independent experiments were conducted and readings were taken in triplicate for each set.
Results
Biocidal Activity
The cyanobacterial extracts obtained after extraction using non-polar, polar and highly polar solvents were tested for their biocidal activity. Algicidal activity was recorded in all the three extracts (Hexane, Dichloromethane and Ethyl acetate) but with varying degree of sensitivity (Fig. 1). Maximum activity was recorded in DCM extract followed by EA and n-Hexane extract. The n-Hexane extract did not show any fungicidal activity while both DCM and EA extract inhibited the growth of fungi. Among the three fungi tested, Rhizoctonia solani was inhibited by the cyanobacterial extract, but the potency of inhibition was more in DCM extract.
Fig. 1.
Inhibition zone produced by cyanobacterial extract (in different solvent systems) on the lawn of unicellular cyanobacteria (Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp.) and phytopathogenic fungus (Rhizoctonia solani)
The bioactivity of the extracted compound when tested against the R. solani revealed significant reduction in growth (Table 1), which was observed from the third day of incubation onwards (6.25%) and the mycelial growth was reduced to 52% after 9 days of incubation.
Table 1.
Effect of cyanobacterial extract (Microcystis aeruginosa) on colony size of Rhizoctonia solani
| Incubation period (days) | Colony diameter (cm) control plates | Colony diameter on plates supplemented with crude cyanobacterial extract | Reduction in growth (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 6.25 |
| 4 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 25.00 |
| 5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 29.00 |
| 6 | 4.3 | 2.8 | 35.00 |
| 7 | 5.4 | 2.9 | 46.00 |
| 8 | 5.8 | 3.0 | 48.00 |
| 9 | 6.5 | 3.1 | 52.00 |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
The minimum inhibitory concentration required for the algicidal and fungicidal activity were calculated by serial dilution of the concentrated extract. The MIC for algicidal activity was 31.25 ppm, while it was 62.5 ppm for fungicidal activity.
Effect of Cyanobacterial Extract on Important Crop Plants
The effect of cyanobacterial crude extract on seed germination of important crop plants was evaluated (Table 2). The concentration of the extract used for this study was 31.25 and 62.5 ppm (i.e. the concentration showing biocidal activity). It was observed that the extracts did not show any significant effect on germination of wheat and rice seeds, whereas the germination of mung seeds were reduced by 10% at 62.5 ppm (MIC). Similarly, the extracts did not show any negative influence on the length of coleoptile and radicle of wheat and rice plant, while in the case of mung seedling 23% reduction in coleoptile length and 6% reduction in radicle length was recorded at 62.5 ppm concentration (Table 3).
Table 2.
Effect of cyanobacterial extract on seed germination of important crop plants
| Concentration of cyanobacterial extract (ppm) | Seed germination (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat | Rice | Mung been | |
| 31.25 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 62.5 | 100 | 100 | 90 |
Table 3.
Effect of cyanobacterial extract on the length of coleoptile and radicle of important crop plants
| Treatments | Length (cm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat | Rice | Mung been | ||||
| Coleoptile | Radicle | Coleoptile | Radicle | Coleoptile | Radicle | |
| Control (water) | 4.87 ± 0.15 | 3.0 ± 0.00 | 5.97 ± 0.58 | 3.03 ± 0.06 | 3.10 ± 0.10 | 1.93 ± 0.06 |
| Control (acetone) | 4.87 ± 0.12 | 2.97 ± 0.06 | 5.87 ± 0.15 | 3.00 ± 0.00 | 3.10 ± 0.00 | 1.90 ± 0.10 |
| 31.25 ppm | 4.90 ± 0.10 | 2.97 ± 0.06 | 5.83 ± 0.15 | 2.93 ± 0.06 | 3.00 ± 0.10 | 1.90 ± 0.10 |
| 62.50 ppm | 4.87 ± 0.12 | 2.90 ± 0.00 | 5.77 ± 0.12 | 2.93 ± 0.06 | 2.87 ± 0.06 | 1.87 ± 0.11 |
Chemical Characterization of Cyanobacterial Extract
The culture filtrate of the cyanobacterium Microcystisaeruginosa isolated from Laxmikund pond, Varanasi, showed algicidal activity [7]. Preliminary chemical characterization of the extract (in different solvent systems) was carried out through TLC. Combinations of different solvent systems were used for resolving the cyanobacterial extracts and hexane:benzene (1:1) proved to be most efficient for maximum resolution of extracts. The n-hexane extract resolved into three spots while dichloromethane (DCM) and ethyl acetate (EA) extract resolved into five spots each. The three spots present in n-hexane extract were common to both DCM and ethyl acetate extract. The other spots for DCM and EA extracts differed from one another and the Rf values of the spots are given in the Table 4.
Table 4.
Rate of flow of different fractions of crude extract of Microcystis aeruginosa after thin layer chromatography using silica coated plates
| Solvent | No. of bands | Rf values | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | G | H | ||
| n-Hexane | 3 | 0.11 | 0.22 | – | – | 0.63 | – | – |
| Dichloromethane | 6 | 0.11 | 0.22 | – | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.86 | 0.92 |
| Ethyl acetate | 6 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.26 | – | 0.63 | – | 0.92 |
Biocidal Activity of Partially Purified Extract
The extracted toxin (DCM extract) was partially purified using preparatory thin layer chromatography. It was found that fraction 4 exhibited maximum activity followed by fraction 5 while the other fractions did not show any fungicidal activity.
Discussion
Cyanobacterial blooms, have now become very common due to increasing eutrophication of water bodies through nutrient enrichment from fertilizer run off from agricultural land, domestic and industrial effluents etc. Some of the common bloom-forming cyanobacterial genera are Microcystis, Aphanizomenon, Anabaena, Nostoc, Nodularia, Oscillatoria etc. Among them, Microcystis is the most common and well characterized genus, which produce microcystins, a group of heptapeptide hepatotoxins having a variety of forms with distinct toxicity levels [13]. The role of environmental, physical and nutritional factors on toxin production by this cyanobacterial genus has been the subject of intensive research since 1980s [10, 14–18, 25]. Also, the genetic aspect of toxin production i.e. the enzyme responsible for toxin production, enzyme structure and genes involved in toxin production by this cyanobacterial genus has also been investigated by several workers [19–22]. Studies have revealed that there is significant influence of culture age on microcystin production. Most of the reports indicate that it is released into the medium in the late exponential phase after cell lysis [2, 25]. Dias et al. [23], recorded similar results with cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon sp. LMECYA 11. They reported that the amount of extracellular toxins increased with culture time, indicating the toxins are released in water through cell lysis and may be expected to remain there upon the collapse of toxic blooms. However, Ray and Bagchi [18] reported a positive correlation of biomass yield and algicide production in Oscillatoria sp.
During the course of the present investigation the presence of biocidal compound was recorded in the crude extract of Microcystis aeruginosa, which showed algicidal and fungicidal activity. In our earlier study with this cyanobacterium, algicidal activity was recorded at all the growth phases i.e. early exponential to decline phase, but the amount of metabolite present varied with culture age and was found to be directly related with the growth of the cyanobacterium [10], these results were similar to those of Ray and Bagchi [18]. Also, the cyanobacterium did not show toxicity against albino mice (data not shown). This reflects that the compounds might include other compounds besides toxin, which play a role in allelopathic interactions, thereby contributing to maintenance of cyanobacterial bloom.
The production of metabolites other than known toxins is not uncommon in cyanobacteria. Suikkanen et al. [24] also reported that the culture of Nodularia spumigena was more allelopathic in exponential phase and more hepatotoxic in stationary phase. Volk [25] also reported that the content of exometabolites of a cyanobacterium Nostoc insulare changes with growth phase. During the linear growth phase, a non toxic metabolite was prevalent while, in stationary phase the content of antimicrobial, cytotoxic metabolite increased. Other workers obtained similar results, which shows that there is no correlation between toxin production and antibiosis in cyanobacteria [26, 27].
The bioassay of crude extract of cyanobacterium (H, DCM, EA) indicated that DCM extract of the cyanobacterium was most active followed by EA extract. Hexane extract did not show any biocidal activity indicating the polar nature of the bioactive molecule. Although the complete chemical nature of the bioactive molecule could not be identified in the present study, bioassay (against R. solani) of different fractions of DCM extract showed that compound no. 4 is most active followed by compound no. 5. The other fractions did not show any bioactivity indicating the possible role of anti-fungal compound (compound no. 4) in the inhibition of the fungus. The presence of anti-fungal compounds has been reported in a few cyanobacterial genera [6, 7, 28, 29].
Effect of crude cyanobacterial extract, on seed germination and growth of important crop plant, revealed that the extract did not have any negative influence on seed germination and growth of seedlings. This can be of added advantage for the use of extract as a fungicidal agent.
The TLC separation of crude cyanobacterial extract in n-Hexane, Dichloromethane and Ethyl Acetate showed the presence of 3, 5 and 5 spots, respectively when Hexane:Benzene was used as solvent system. This confirms the presence of more than one metabolite in the extract(s); which is further confirmed by presence of more than one peak in the GLC analyses of the extracts. The presence of large no of metabolites with varying toxicity and host range has been reported in cyanobacteria [30–32]. Recently Volk and Mundt [33] also reported the presence of no. of metabolites in filtrate of cyanobacterium Nostoc insulare though all of them were not toxic.
There has been tremendous concern all throughout the world over the nuisance created by this bloom-forming cyanobacterium, i.e. Microcystis. The current investigation highlights the potential of this cyanobacterium as a source of compounds for application in agriculture and industry. Also, it emphasizes the need to characterize the cyanobacterial extract/filtrate at different growth phases, which may prove to be of tremendous biotechnological interest because of the broad spectrum of activity and their pharmaceutical significance.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) providing financial assistance, in the form of projects, and the facilities provided by Division of Microbiology, IARI, New Delhi and AS and EC Division, CIPHET, Ludhiana is gratefully acknowledged.
References
- 1.Codd GA, Poon GK (1988) Cyanobacterial toxins. In: Rogers LJ, Gallon JR (eds) Biochemistry of the algae and cyanobacteria. Proc Phytochem Soc Eur vol. 28. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 283–296
- 2.Carmichael WW. The toxins of cyanobacteria. Sci Am. 1994;270:78–86. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0194-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Harada K. Production of secondary metabolites by freshwater Cyanobacteria. Chem Pharm Bull. 2004;52:889–899. doi: 10.1248/cpb.52.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sivonen K. Effects of light, temperature, nitrate, orthophosphate and bacteria on growth and hepatotoxin production by Oscillatoria agardhii strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:2658–2666. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.9.2658-2666.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pouria S, deAndrade A, Barbosa J, Caavalcant RL, Barreto VTS, Ward CJ. Fatal microcystin intoxication in haemodialysis unit in Caruaru, Brazil. Lancet. 1998;352:21–26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)12285-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nagle DG, Wedge DE. Antifungal properties of cyanobacteria and algae: ecological and agricultural implications. In: Inderjit, Malik AU, editors. Chemical ecology of plants: allelopathy in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, Birkhauser. Switzerland: Verlag; 2002. pp. 7–32. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Volk RB, Furkert FH. Anti-algal, antibacterial and antifungal activity of two metabolites produced by cyanobacteria during growth. Microbiol Res. 2006;161:180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2005.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Namikoshi M, Rinehart KL. Bioactive compounds produced by cyanobacteria. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;17:373–384. doi: 10.1007/BF01574768. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jaiswal P, Prasanna R, Singh PK. Isolation and screening of rice field cyanobacteria exhibiting algicidal activity. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci. 2005;7:367–373. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jaiswal P, Prasanna R, Singh PK. Factors influencing algicide production by Microcystis sp. and its effect on selected cyanobacteria. In: Gupta RK, Pandey VD, editors. Advances in applied phycology. New Delhi: Daya Publishing House; 2007. pp. 75–84. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M, Stanier R. Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure culture of cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1979;111:1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Prasanna R, Saxena AK, Jaiswal PJ, Nayak S. Development of alternative support system for viable count of cyanobacteria by most probable number method. Folia Microbiol. 2006;51:455–458. doi: 10.1007/BF02931590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rinehart KL, Namikoshi M, Chai BW. Structure and biosynthesis of toxins from blue green algae (Cyanobacteria) J Appl Phycol. 1994;6:159–176. doi: 10.1007/BF02186070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Watanabe MF, Oishi S. Effects of environmental factors on toxicity of a cyanobacterium (Microcystis aeruginosa) under culture conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985;49:1342–1344. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.5.1342-1344.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Westhuizen AJ, Eloff JN, Kruger GHJ. Effect of temperature and light (fluence rate) on the composition of the toxin of the cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa (UV-006) Arch Hydrobiol. 1986;163:55–59. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wicks JR, Thiel PG. Environmental factors affecting the production of peptide toxins in floating scums of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa in a hypertrophic African reservoir. Environ Sci Technol. 1990;24:1413–1418. doi: 10.1021/es00079a017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rapala J, Sivonen K. Assessment of environmental condition that favour hepatotoxic and neurotoxic Anabaena sp strain in cultured under light limitation at different temperature. Microb Ecol. 1998;36:181–192. doi: 10.1007/s002489900105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ray S, Bagchi SN. Nutrients and pH regulate algicide accumulation in cultures of cyanobacterium Oscillatoria latevirens. New Phytol. 2001;149:455–460. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nishizawa T, Asayama M, Fujii K, Harada K, Shirai M. Genetic analysis of the peptide synthetase genes for a cyclic heptapeptide microcystin in Microcystis spp. J Biochem. 1999;126:520–529. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tillett D, Parker DL, Neilan BA. Detection of toxigenicity by a probe for the microcystin synthetase A gene (mcyA) of the cyanobacterial genus Microcystis: comparison of toxicities with 16S RNA and phycocyanin operon (phycocyanin intergenic spacer) phylogenies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:2810–2818. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2810-2818.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mikalsen B, Boisen G, Skulberg OM, Fastner J, Davis W, Gabrielsen TM, Rudi K, Jacobson KS. Natural variation in microcystin synthetase operon mcyABC and impact on microcystin production in Microcystis strains. J Biochem. 2003;126:520. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.9.2774-2785.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ouellette AJ, Handy SM, Wilhelm SW. Toxic Microcystis is widespread in Lake Erie: PCR detection of toxin genes and molecular characterization of associated cyanobacterial communities. Microb Ecol. 2006;178:421–427. doi: 10.1007/s00248-004-0146-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dias E, Pereira P, Franca S. Production of paralytic shellfish toxins by Aphanizomenon sp. LMECYA 31 (cyanobacteria) J Phycol. 2002;38:305–308. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.01146.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Suikkanen S, Fistaral GO, Graneli E. Allelopathic effects of the Baltic cyanobacteria Nodularia spumigena, Aphanizomenon flos aquae and Anabaena lemmermanni on algal monoculture. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol. 2004;308:85–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2004.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Volk RB. Studies on culture age versus exometabolite production in batch cultures of the cyanobacterium Nostoc imsulare. J Appl Phycol. 2007;19:491–495. doi: 10.1007/s10811-007-9161-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ostensvik O, Skulberg ON, Underdal B, Harmazabal V. Antibacterial properties of extracts from selected planktonic freshwater Cyanobacteria—a comparative study of bacterial bioassay. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;84:1117–1124. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00449.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Skulberg OM. Microalgae as a source of bioactive molecules-experience from cyanophyte research. J Appl Phycol. 2000;12:341–348. doi: 10.1023/A:1008140403621. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Frankmolle WP, Larsen LK, Caplan FR, Patterson GML, Knubel G, Moore RE. Antifungal cyclic peptides from the terrestrial blue green alga Anabaena laxa. J Antibiot. 1992;45(9):1451–1457. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.45.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kulik MM. The potential for using cyanobacteria (blue green algae) and algae in the biological control of plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Eur J Plant Pathol. 1995;101:585–599. doi: 10.1007/BF01874863. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Falch BS, Konig GM, Wright AD, Sticher O, Angerhofer CK, Pezzuto JM, Bachimann H. Biological activities of cyanobateria: evaluation of extracts and pure compounds. Planta Med. 1995;61:321–328. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-958092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jaki B, Heilman J, Sticher O. New antibacterial metabolites from the Cyanobacteria Nostoc commune (EAWAG 122b) J Nat Prod. 2000;63:1283–1285. doi: 10.1021/np000033s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jaki B, Orjala J, Burgi HR, Sticher O. Biological screening of cyanobacteria for antimicrobial and molluscicidal activity, Brine shrimp lethality and cytotoxicity. Pharm Biol. 1999;37:138–143. doi: 10.1076/phbi.37.2.138.6092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Volk RB, Mundt S. Cytotoxic and non cytotoxic exometabolites of the cyanobacterium Nostoc insulare. J Appl Phycol. 2007;19:55–62. doi: 10.1007/s10811-006-9110-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

