Skip to main content
BMC Genomics logoLink to BMC Genomics
. 2011 Oct 16;12:509. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-509

Gene expression profiling in the Cynomolgus macaque Macaca fascicularis shows variation within the normal birth range

Bright Starling Emerald 1,4,, Keefe Chng 1, Shinya Masuda 1, Deborah M Sloboda 2, Mark H Vickers 2, Ravi Kambadur 1,3, Peter D Gluckman 1,2
PMCID: PMC3210194  PMID: 21999700

Abstract

Background

Although an adverse early-life environment has been linked to an increased risk of developing the metabolic syndrome, the molecular mechanisms underlying altered disease susceptibility as well as their relevance to humans are largely unknown. Importantly, emerging evidence suggests that these effects operate within the normal range of birth weights and involve mechanisms of developmental palsticity rather than pathology.

Method

To explore this further, we utilised a non-human primate model Macaca fascicularis (Cynomolgus macaque) which shares with humans the same progressive history of the metabolic syndrome. Using microarray we compared tissues from neonates in the average birth weight (50-75th centile) to those of lower birth weight (5-25th centile) and studied the effect of different growth trajectories within the normal range on gene expression levels in the umbilical cord, neonatal liver and skeletal muscle.

Results

We identified 1973 genes which were differentially expressed in the three tissue types between average and low birth weight animals (P < 0.05). Gene ontology analysis identified that these genes were involved in metabolic processes including cellular lipid metabolism, cellular biosynthesis, cellular macromolecule synthesis, cellular nitrogen metabolism, cellular carbohydrate metabolism, cellular catabolism, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism, regulation of molecular functions, biological adhesion and development.

Conclusion

These differences in gene expression levels between animals in the upper and lower percentiles of the normal birth weight range may point towards early life metabolic adaptations that in later life result in differences in disease risk.

Background

Clinical, experimental and epidemiological studies have highlighted a link between the early-life environment and the health and well-being of offspring in later life. An adverse maternal environment has been linked to an increased risk of developing metabolic and cardiovascular disorders including type 2 diabetes, obesity, hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance and hypertension [1-7]. An important feature of these studies is that these relationships exist within the normative birth range and do not depend on extremes of birth weight. This has led to the proposal that later life disease risk is the result of maladaptive consequences of plastic mechanisms which would normally be adaptive [8,9].

It is proposed that developmental plasticity determines the trajectory of development through epigenetic processes such that the fetus attempts to match its later phenotype to the environment [10]. It has been proposed that low birth weight is a marker of a poor early life nutritional environment [11] and thus a smaller fetus is more likely to develop a metabolic capacity appropriate for a low nutrient postnatal environment. But, if faced with a high nutrient environment it is more likely to become obese and insulin resistant [12]. Although, epigenetic processes have been increasingly implicated largely from rodent studies involving nutritional manipulation of the dam [13,14] the molecular mechanisms underlying altered disease susceptibility are largely unknown. There is also some evidence that these developmental trajectories, and associated long-term gene expression and epigenetic changes can be reversed by the administration of the adipokine leptin to the neonatal rat although the concentrations used were higher than physiological levels [10,12,15,16]. These data suggest that a better understanding of the molecular events associated with impaired early life development may help in designing future intervention strategies.

To identify the possible molecular pathways associated with variations in the fetal environment, we have utilised a non-human primate (NHP) model, the Macaca fascicularis (Cynomolgus macaque) to elucidate whether variations within the normal birth weight range are associated with differential gene expressions patterns. Cynomolgus macaques share with humans the same progressive history of the metabolic syndrome [17] which makes this model directly relevant to humans and importantly, Cynomolgus macaque is a monotocous species in which spontaneous variation in fetal growth rather than experimental manipulation can be investigated. This study therefore we have investigated the effect of spontaneous lower birth weight on gene expression in key tissues (umbilical cord, hepatic tissue and skeletal muscle) from female Cynomolgus macaque neonates.

Methods

Collection of Umblical cords

Sixty-five pregnant Cynomolgus macaque dams, sired naturally by one male, were monitored prior to delivery at the Vietnam Primate Breeding and Development Corporation. After birth, dams were sedated (ketamine-HCl; 7 mg/kg) to facilitate collection of the umbilical cord. The cords were collected and immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for later analyses. Neonates were weighed at birth and promptly returned to the dams. All animal procedures were approved by Nafovanny, subsidiary of the Ministry of Forestry, Vietnam, and performed in accordance with the guidelines set by the national advisory committee for laboratory animal research (NACLAR) of Singapore.

Collection of hepatic and skeletal muscle samples

The normative birth range was assessed from these 65 pregnancies and 8 neonates were selected based on their birth weights to comprise 2 groups: 1) lower birth weight group (LBW); n = 4 classified as those that were within the 5th to 25th birth weight percentile, birth weight range 299-317 g and 2) average birth weight group (ABW); n = 4 classified as those that were within the 50th to 75th birth weight percentile, birth weight range 358-398 g. The normal gestation of Cynomolgus macaque is approximately 155-170 days [18]. We have estimated the gestational age based on early ultrasound measurements (greatest length of the embryo at the time of pregnancy detection) and used those pregnancies where fetuses were within normal distribution for full term Cynomolgus macaques [18]. On postnatal day 5, neonates were sedated with an intramuscular injection of ketamine-HCl (15 mg/kg), and exsanguinated under anesthesia. Liver and skeletal muscle (biceps femoris) were collected and immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for later analyses

Preparation of Total RNA

Total RNA was isolated from umbilical cords and neonatal tissues using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). RNA integrity was confirmed by bio analyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). An RNA Integrity Number (RIN) value of 7.5 above was considered acceptable and used in further experiments.

Microarray analysis

For microarray analysis, RNA from 6 groups of samples (Cord: ABW and LBW; Liver: ABW and LBW; skeletal muscle: ABW and LBW) were labeled using QuickAmp 1-color labeling kit (Agilent Technologies) according to manufacturer's protocol. The Cy3 labeled cRNA were subsequently hybridized to Agilent Rhesus Macaque (G2519F-015421) Gene Expression microarray. The Rhesus macaque gene expression microarray used in this study represented 43,803 Rhesus monkey probes synthesized as 60-mers spotted using the Agilent SurePrint technology (Agilent Technologies). The microarrays were scanned with Agilent High resolution Scanner and the images were feature extracted using FE software version 10.5 (Agilent Technologies).

Data analysis was performed using Genespring GX ver10 (Agilent Technologies). The raw signal intensity from each samples is global normalized to 75th percentile and base-line transformed. Probes flagged with present call in at least 75% of the samples in any of the 6 groups were used for subsequent data analysis.

Two-way ANOVA was performed with p value cut-off at 0.05 to identify genes that are differentially expressed in the tissue type and birth weight. Due to limited annotation of Rhesus Monkey genome, the microarray probes are annotated against human genes and ontology. For mapping against the human genome, the probes from the monkey microarray were re-annotated using Agilent eARRAY. The probe sequences were aligned to human genome (hg18) using BLAST based algorithm and the associated human annotation was extracted from the database.

To study the gene expression profile of the birth weight in each of the tissue type, Welch T-Test with p-value cut off of 0.05 and fold change of 1.5X was performed between the ABW and LBW samples in each of the tissue groups.

Complete microarray data is available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under the accession number GSE32069.

Network Analysis

The microarray data was imported into Pathway Studio version 7 (Ariadne Genomics, Rockville, USA) for network analysis. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed on ABW vs LBW in the respective tissue using Kolmogorov-Smirnov algorithm with p-value cut-off at 0.05. In addition, Network Enrichment Analysis (NEA) was performed to identify expression hub of the treatment. Sub network was generated by connecting entities to their expression target network using the Resnet 7 Mammalian database.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Five up-regulated and two down regulated genes were selected for verification using qRT-PCR. The primers were designed using the Cynomolgus if available or Rhesus macaque sequences using the primer 3 software if not available [19]. The gene symbols and the primers are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR:

PASK F 5' CTACTCCGGGAGCTGCTATC 3'
PASK R5' AGCAGCAGAACAGAGGTGTG 3'


116936 F5' GCACATCTGCCTGAAGTGAA 3'

116936 R5' GAGCAGCTTGTCCAGGAAGT 3'


ADK F5' TGGTGGCTCTACCCAGAACT 3'

ADK R5' CATCTACATGGGCTTCAGCA 3'


ELMO F5' AGCTCTGTGTGGCTTGGTTT 3'

ELMO R5' CGGTGTGAATAACGGAGTCCT 3'


SIX1 F5' GTTTAAGAACCGGAGGCAAA 3'

SIX1 R5' GGAGAGAGTTGGTTCTGCTTG 3'


SLC12A9 F5' GGCTTCAACAGCAGTACCCT 3'

SLC12A9 R5' AAGAGGACAGCAAAGACGCT 3'


RBL1 F5' TAGCCTGACCAACATGGAGA 3'

RBL1 R5' GTTCAAGCAATTCTGCCTCA 3'


Uni18SrRNA F5' AGTCCCTGCCCTTTGTACACA 3'

Uni18SrRNA R5' GATCCGAGGGCCTCACTAAAC 3'

We used skeletal muscle RNA to verify the array. Briefly, total RNA was extracted as mentioned above from four ABW and four LBW neonates and were reverse transcribed using Applied Biosystem's high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit using 1 μg of total RNA in a reaction volume of 20 μl. The PCR reactions were carried out in 25 μl of SYBR Green Master Mix with 200 ng of cDNA using 7500 real time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The comparative Ct method was used to calculate the relative gene expression [20]. 18S RNA was used as the internal control which was validated using the method described in Schmittgen and Livak [20] and found to be stable and consistent.

Results

Microarray analysis

Two-way factorial ANOVA identified 1973 genes which were differentially expressed in the three tissue types between ABW and LBW neonates (P < 0.05). Of these, 1141 genes were up regulated in the LBW samples while 832 genes were down-regulated in the LBW samples compared to ABW (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Hierarchical clustergram of 1973 genes (1141 up regulated in LBW and 832 down regulated in LBW) identified by ANOVA (P < 0.05) in all the three tissues (umbilical cord (C), liver (L) and skeletal muscle (B) analyzed. The relative expression is reflected by the intensity of the color (Green = down regulated, red = up regulated)

Gene expression profiles of umbilical cord, liver and skeletal muscle were also compared using Welch-t-test. There were 250 genes significantly and differently expressed in the liver, 850 genes significantly and differently expressed in the skeletal muscle and 891 genes significantly and differently expressed in cord samples (P < 0.05, >1.5 fold difference) (Figure 2, 3). The top 50 genes whose gene expression levels changed in each tissue based on their fold difference based on Welch T-test are given in Tables 2, 3, 4.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Heat map depicting the differentially expressed genes in skeletal muscle (850 genes), liver (210 genes) and cord (891 genes) (P < 0.05, >= 1.5 fold difference). A. 733 genes (584 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle, 149 genes down regulated in LBW skeletal muscle), B. 19 genes (16 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 15 genes up regulated in LBW liver, 3 genes down regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 4 genes down regulated in liver). C 182 genes (115 genes up regulated in LBW liver and 67 genes down regulated in LBW liver). D 5 genes (2 genes up regulated in LBW cords and 3 genes up regulated LBW liver, 3 genes down regulated in LBW cords and 2 genes down regulated in LBW liver). E. 788 genes (338 genes up regulated in LBW cord and 450 genes down regulated LBW cord). F. 94 genes (60 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 22 up regulated in LBW cord, 34 genes down regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 72 genes down regulated in LBW cord. G. 4 genes (4 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and liver, 4 genes down regulated in LBW cord).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Venn diagram depicting the differentially expressed genes in skeletal muscle (850 genes), liver (210 genes) and cord (891 genes) t-test unpaired unequal variance, LBW vs ABW, p < 0.05, >= 1.5 fold difference.

Table 2.

List of top 50 genes significantly differentially regulated in the skeletal muscle based on fold difference (t-test).

Gene Symbol 2Way ANOVA P value Fold Change in Skeletal muscle, Welch t-test Regulation in LBW Fold change Liver, Welch t-test Regulation in LBW Fold change in Cords, Welch t-test Regulation in LBW Gene name
XM_116936 0.017913306 10.054285 up 1.080386 up 2.185324 up PREDICTED: Homo sapiens similar to RIKEN cDNA 4832428D23 gene (LOC196541) mRNA [XM_116936]

XM_056254 0.021895792 9.569201 up 2.09208 down 1.391897 up PREDICTED: Homo sapiens heparan sulfate (glucosamine) 3-O-sulfotransferase 4 (HS3ST4) mRNA [XM_056254]
C5orf23 0.01475329 6.0808635 up 1.072585 up 1.301361 up Homo sapiens chromosome 5 open reading frame 23 (C5orf23), mRNA [NM_024563]

PASK 0.03426426 5.977056 up 2.995584 up 19.17474 up Homo sapiens PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase (PASK), mRNA [NM_015148]
WDR8 0.004681234 5.6804295 down 2.978104 down 8.061375 down Homo sapiens WD repeat domain 8 (WDR8), mRNA [NM_017818]

ADK 1.63E-04 5.639505 down 1.368648 down 9.386349 down Homo sapiens adenosine kinase (ADK), transcript variant ADK-short, mRNA [NM_001123]
APOBEC3G 0.040698703 4.8567457 down 1.669566 down 1.105857 down Homo sapiens apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3G (APOBEC3G), mRNA [NM_021822]

CCL2 0.002121243 4.757898 down 1.287543 down 2.895307 down Homo sapiens chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), mRNA [NM_002982]
A_01_P013390 0.029869065 4.6248507 down 1.099004 down 1.527467 down

BC044226 0.04677891 4.3998837 down 1.966762 down 1.502299 down Homo sapiens myosin binding protein H, mRNA [BC044226]
CCL11 0.008992519 4.050988 down 3.178148 down 1.002582 up Homo sapiens chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 11 (CCL11), mRNA [NM_002986]

POU4F3 0.02459994 3.8642302 up 1.615214 up 1.991698 down Homo sapiens POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 3 (POU4F3), mRNA [NM_002700]
XR_011794 0.010519872 3.7855186 up 3.637105 up 2.76764 up PREDICTED: Macaca mulatta similar to poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN)-like domain containing 1 (LOC707835), mRNA [XR_011794]

H1FOO 0.011109326 3.7804163 up 1.404401 up 1.449255 down Homo sapiens H1 histone family, member O, oocyte-specific (H1FOO), mRNA [NM_153833]
C17orf75 0.001362531 3.7583363 down 3.447702 down 1.443745 down Homo sapiens chromosome 17 open reading frame 75 (C17orf75), mRNA [NM_022344]

RNF216 0.001650785 3.7307158 down 1.504036 down 6.793567 down Homo sapiens TRIAD3 protein (TRIAD3), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_207111]
GTSF1 0.017040279 3.6632807 up 4.653995 up 2.487166 up Homo sapiens family with sequence similarity 112, member B (FAM112B), mRNA [NM_144594]

C13orf33 0.006214988 3.5870998 down 2.664488 down 1.061963 up Homo sapiens chromosome 13 open reading frame 33 (C13orf33), mRNA [NM_032849]
CA2 0.033340864 3.5736616 down 3.483002 down 1.194329 up Homo sapiens carbonic anhydrase II (CA2), mRNA [NM_000067]

CO645773 0.03704907 3.5384166 down 2.022003 down 1.474969 down ILLUMIGEN_MCQ_30118 Katze_MMPB Macaca mulatta cDNA clone IBIUW:22572 5' similar to Bases 1 to 42 highly similar to human RARRES3 (Hs.17466), mRNA sequence [CO645773]
MYST3 0.013409907 3.3029778 up 2.827006 up 1.403819 up Homo sapiens MYST histone acetyltransferase (monocytic leukemia) 3 (MYST3), mRNA [NM_006766]

NM_000977 0.008561992 3.2655115 up 2.138359 up 2.014805 up Homo sapiens ribosomal protein L13 (RPL13), transcript variant 1, mRNA. [NM_000977]
XR_014265 0.001382546 3.2319098 down 1.270026 down 2.168579 down PREDICTED: Macaca mulatta hypothetical protein LOC716045 (LOC716045), mRNA [XR_014265]

NM_001004685 0.043442905 3.1747854 up 1.353824 up 1.407273 down Homo sapiens olfactory receptor, family 2, subfamily F, member 2 (OR2F2), mRNA. [NM_001004685]
XR_014204 0.029225934 3.167453 down 3.849135 down 1.084816 up PREDICTED: Macaca mulatta hypothetical protein LOC719546 (LOC719546), mRNA [XR_014204]

DARS 3.99E-05 3.1527941 down 1.10567 down 12.63266 down Homo sapiens aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (DARS), mRNA [NM_001349]
GYLTL1B 9.45E-04 3.143812 up 1.169517 up 3.19979 up Homo sapiens glycosyltransferase-like 1B (GYLTL1B), mRNA [NM_152312]

CNNM2 1.94E-04 3.1423542 up 1.00608 down 1.785853 up Homo sapiens cyclin M2 (CNNM2), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_017649]
C20orf26 0.023210809 3.1168563 up 1.353857 up 1.414684 up Homo sapiens chromosome 20 open reading frame 26 (C20orf26), mRNA [NM_015585]

SLC26A9 0.042099766 3.0884879 up 2.137558 up 1.776504 up Homo sapiens solute carrier family 26, member 9 (SLC26A9), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_052934]
SEC14L3 0.025527291 3.0402198 up 1.787294 up 1.547541 down Homo sapiens SEC14-like 3 (S. cerevisiae) (SEC14L3), mRNA [NM_174975]

TMEM20 0.001055841 2.9346027 down 1.821723 down 1.558415 down Homo sapiens transmembrane protein 20 (TMEM20), mRNA [NM_153226]
UHRF1 0.042854026 2.9323897 down 1.272487 down 1.455897 down Homo sapiens ubiquitin-like, containing PHD and RING finger domains, 1 (UHRF1), transcript variant 2, mRNA [NM_013282]

CST9L 0.008572864 2.9286344 up 1.46455 up 1.695363 down Homo sapiens cystatin 9-like (mouse) (CST9L), mRNA [NM_080610]
C2 0.005425731 2.906241 down 1.470166 down 1.228973 up Homo sapiens complement component 2 (C2), mRNA [NM_000063]

C7orf62 0.03373279 2.8281868 up 1.466387 up 1.326441 down Homo sapiens hypothetical protein MGC26647 (MGC26647), mRNA [NM_152706]
HOXB13 0.008404698 2.822795 up 1.530259 up 1.061908 down Homo sapiens homeobox B13 (HOXB13), mRNA [NM_006361]

ANLN 0.026928915 2.8110342 down 1.205709 down 1.210447 down Homo sapiens anillin, actin binding protein (ANLN), mRNA [NM_018685]
TMEM45B 0.02836952 2.789488 up 1.108079 up 1.434473 up Homo sapiens transmembrane protein 45B (TMEM45B), mRNA [NM_138788]

COL8A2 0.029133584 2.7760508 down 1.111961 down 2.334076 down Homo sapiens collagen, type VIII, alpha 2 (COL8A2), mRNA [NM_005202]
IL15RA 3.56E-05 2.7710447 down 2.542192 down 5.776398 down Homo sapiens interleukin 15 receptor, alpha (IL15RA), transcript variant 2, mRNA [NM_172200]

AY937248 0.002621024 2.7557867 up 1.074139 down 2.046131 up Macaca mulatta placental protein 14 mRNA, complete cds [AY937248]
SCN3B 0.00199475 2.7342772 up 1.566765 up 1.26591 up Homo sapiens sodium channel, voltage-gated, type III, beta (SCN3B), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_018400]

TRIM6 0.005424626 2.7181938 up 1.451755 up 1.960095 up Homo sapiens tripartite motif-containing 6 (TRIM6), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_001003818]
TNS4 0.041628703 2.7158492 up 1.315606 up 1.297834 down Homo sapiens tensin 4 (TNS4), mRNA [NM_032865]

PDE1C 0.026903268 2.6685586 up 1.596604 up 1.15087 down Homo sapiens phosphodiesterase 1C, calmodulin-dependent 70kDa (PDE1C), mRNA [NM_005020]
S100A4 0.01836204 2.656307 down 1.047433 down 2.01034 down Homo sapiens S100 calcium binding protein A4 (S100A4), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_002961]

AADACL1 0.017924123 2.6216743 down 1.119603 down 1.47176 down Homo sapiens arylacetamide deacetylase-like 1 (AADACL1), mRNA [NM_020792]
XR_011345 0.029255124 2.6165082 up 1.450092 up 1.492756 down PREDICTED: Macaca mulatta similar to otoancorin isoform 1 (LOC699600), mRNA [XR_011345]

FN1 0.02028952 2.6025481 down 1.05622 down 1.051482 down Homo sapiens fibronectin 1 (FN1), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_212482]
SP7 3.05E-04 2.5985072 up 1.616763 up 1.088733 down Homo sapiens Sp7 transcription factor (SP7), mRNA [NM_152860]

Table 3.

List of top 50 genes significantly differentially regulated in liver based on fold difference (t-test).

Gene Symbol 2Way ANOVA P value Fold Change in Liver Welch t-test Regulation in LBW Fold change skeletal tissue, Welch t-test Regulation in LBW Fold change in Cords, Welch t-test Regulation in LBW Gene name
ELMOD1 0.011425177 25.931845 down 1.737314 down 2.051013 up Homo sapiens ELMO/CED-12 domain containing 1 (ELMOD1), mRNA [NM_018712]

RBBP9 0.026729036 11.012514 down 1.47388 down 5.131376 down Homo sapiens retinoblastoma binding protein 9 (RBBP9), mRNA [NM_006606]
MMP25 0.001325307 10.996225 down 2.384582 down 1.436251 down Homo sapiens matrix metallopeptidase 25 (MMP25), mRNA [NM_022468]

C5orf46 0.047762383 10.762607 down 1.234639 up 1.096919 up Homo sapiens similar to AVLV472 (MGC23985), mRNA [NM_206966]
GOLSYN 2.29E-05 6.13113 up 1.05566 up 1.458383 up Homo sapiens hypothetical protein FLJ20366 (FLJ20366), mRNA [NM_017786]

LCN15 0.005291665 5.3478875 up 1.891747 up 2.217465 up Homo sapiens MSFL2541 (UNQ2541), mRNA [NM_203347]
CCDC146 0.030661521 5.281487 up 1.06658 up 1.360575 up Homo sapiens KIAA1505 protein (KIAA1505), mRNA [NM_020879]

AK094929 0.001118242 5.262121 up 1.690864 up 1.110624 up Homo sapiens cDNA FLJ37610 fis, clone BRCOC2011398. [AK094929]
SORCS3 0.00328917 5.0026994 up 2.266284 up 2.921157 up Homo sapiens sortilin-related VPS10 domain containing receptor 3 (SORCS3), mRNA [NM_014978]

COL4A4 0.01571377 4.897748 down 1.548386 down 1.059327 down Homo sapiens collagen, type IV, alpha 4 (COL4A4), mRNA [NM_000092]
IL1R2 0.004347455 4.777918 down 1.8715 down 1.690538 down Homo sapiens interleukin 1 receptor, type II (IL1R2), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_004633]

CD200R1 0.04967409 4.7169123 down 1.052303 up 1.319852 down Homo sapiens CD200 receptor 1 (CD200R1), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_138806]
GTSF1 0.017040279 4.653995 up 3.663281 up 2.487166 up Homo sapiens family with sequence similarity 112, member B (FAM112B), mRNA [NM_144594]

SNAI1 0.005038617 4.582946 down 1.534132 down 1.847129 down Homo sapiens snail homolog 1 (Drosophila) (SNAI1), mRNA [NM_005985]
USH1C 0.00505742 4.3276477 up 1.595945 up 1.465964 up Homo sapiens Usher syndrome 1C (autosomal recessive, severe) (USH1C), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_005709]

ALLC 0.006709512 4.060955 up 1.861818 up 2.766094 up Homo sapiens allantoicase (ALLC), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_018436]
CXCL3 0.04903758 3.9091544 down 1.096309 down 1.172056 up Homo sapiens chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 3 (CXCL3), mRNA [NM_002090]

XR_014204 0.029225934 3.8491352 down 3.167453 down 1.084816 up PREDICTED: Macaca mulatta hypothetical protein LOC719546 (LOC719546), mRNA [XR_014204]
XR_011794 0.010519872 3.637105 up 3.785519 up 2.76764 up PREDICTED: Macaca mulatta similar to poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN)-like domain containing 1 (LOC707835), mRNA [XR_011794]

NMNAT2 0.045685206 3.6255727 up 2.521069 down 2.189285 up Homo sapiens nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 2 (NMNAT2), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_015039]
SLC39A8 0.041505713 3.6139402 down 1.366996 down 1.390711 down Homo sapiens solute carrier family 39 (zinc transporter), member 8 (SLC39A8), mRNA [NM_022154]

CA2 0.033340864 3.4830022 down 3.573662 down 1.194329 up Homo sapiens carbonic anhydrase II (CA2), mRNA [NM_000067]
NTRK3 0.003890598 3.4711208 up 1.593136 up 1.043792 down Homo sapiens neurotrophic tyrosine kinase, receptor, type 3 (NTRK3), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_001012338]

C17orf75 0.001362531 3.4477015 down 3.758336 down 1.443745 down Homo sapiens chromosome 17 open reading frame 75 (C17orf75), mRNA [NM_022344]
CXCL1 0.006956845 3.392382 down 1.063934 up 4.611126 down Homo sapiens chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (melanoma growth stimulating activity, alpha) (CXCL1), mRNA [NM_001511]

NM_198692 0.03194352 3.3605232 down 1.343767 up 1.654617 down Homo sapiens keratin associated protein 10-11 (KRTAP10-11), mRNA. [NM_198692]
SHANK2 0.023280138 3.3547363 up 1.255762 up 1.189415 down Homo sapiens SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains 2 (SHANK2), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_012309]

CCDC81 0.004982437 3.2717588 down 1.533572 down 4.912844 down Homo sapiens coiled-coil domain containing 81 (CCDC81), mRNA [NM_021827]
CCL11 0.008992519 3.1781478 down 4.050988 down 1.002582 up Homo sapiens chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 11 (CCL11), mRNA [NM_002986]

CO647386 0.020776557 3.1651435 down 1.030158 down 1.631509 down ILLUMIGEN_MCQ_40418 Katze_MMPB2 Macaca mulatta cDNA clone IBIUW:21432 5' similar to Bases 185 to 778 highly similar to human CXCL2 (Hs.75765), mRNA sequence [CO647386]
GPR98 0.024752488 3.1570897 down 1.10821 down 3.919889 down Homo sapiens G protein-coupled receptor 98 (GPR98), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_032119]

TMEM59L 5.34E-04 3.137047 up 1.57364 up 1.407988 up Homo sapiens transmembrane protein 59-like (TMEM59L), mRNA [NM_012109]
UGT1A6 0.040070046 3.1353552 down 2.066639 down 1.399845 down Homo sapiens UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1 family, polypeptide A6 (UGT1A6), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_001072]

KCNE2 7.02E-04 3.1135461 up 1.972823 up 1.170852 down Homo sapiens potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 2 (KCNE2), mRNA [NM_172201]
XR_012376 0.022554293 3.0699794 down 1.9303 down 1.439485 down PREDICTED: Macaca mulatta hypothetical protein LOC710335 (LOC710335), mRNA [XR_012376]

RXFP1 0.002097808 3.0400152 up 1.931833 up 1.276558 up Homo sapiens relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 1 (RXFP1), mRNA [NM_021634]
ITGBL1 0.02861261 3.0041916 down 2.563332 down 1.243521 down Homo sapiens integrin, beta-like 1 (with EGF-like repeat domains) (ITGBL1), mRNA [NM_004791]

PASK 0.03426426 2.995584 up 5.977056 up 19.17474 up Homo sapiens PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase (PASK), mRNA [NM_015148]
DEFB1 0.004949556 2.9797235 down 1.065357 up 2.807533 down Homo sapiens defensin, beta 1 (DEFB1), mRNA [NM_005218]

WDR8 0.004681234 2.9781044 down 5.68043 down 8.061375 down Homo sapiens WD repeat domain 8 (WDR8), mRNA [NM_017818]
RIMS4 0.04112827 2.9677074 up 1.724443 up 1.024011 down Homo sapiens regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 4 (RIMS4), mRNA [NM_182970]

PDGFRL 0.011396675 2.9371088 down 1.21306 down 1.55284 down Homo sapiens platelet-derived growth factor receptor-like (PDGFRL), mRNA [NM_006207]
TNRC4 0.005930619 2.9251838 up 1.208589 up 1.396738 up Homo sapiens trinucleotide repeat containing 4 (TNRC4), mRNA [NM_007185]

UGT2B11 0.02518766 2.9193914 down 1.09908 down 2.958316 down Homo sapiens UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B11 (UGT2B11), mRNA [NM_001073]
FLT3LG 0.029793594 2.8908129 up 1.037797 down 1.527226 up Homo sapiens fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (FLT3LG), mRNA [NM_001459]

IP6K3 0.03900314 2.8685477 up 1.471319 up 1.39455 down Homo sapiens inositol hexaphosphate kinase 3 (IHPK3), mRNA [NM_054111]
ST6GALNAC1 0.03669531 2.8622296 down 1.408642 down 2.126189 down Homo sapiens ST6 (alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminyl-2,3-beta-galactosyl-1,3)-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1 (ST6GALNAC1), mRNA [NM_018414]

EFNA4 0.007086268 2.843187 down 1.084758 up 2.766163 down Homo sapiens ephrin-A4 (EFNA4), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_005227]
MYST3 0.013409907 2.827006 up 3.302978 up 1.403819 up Homo sapiens MYST histone acetyltransferase (monocytic leukemia) 3 (MYST3), mRNA [NM_006766]

XM_370715 0.001614059 2.7565975 up 1.561267 up 2.382949 up PREDICTED: Homo sapiens similar to hypothetical protein MGC48915 (LOC387911), mRNA [XM_370715]
NM_031436 0.035783853 2.6903787 up 1.740635 up 1.698687 up Homo sapiens aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C-like 2 (AKR1CL2), mRNA. [NM_031436]

Table 4.

Top 50 genes significantly differentially regulated in cord based on fold difference (t-test).

Gene Symbol 2Way ANOVA P value Fold Change in cord, Welch t-test Regulation in LBW Fold change skeletal tissue, Welch t-test Regulation in LBW Fold change in liver, Regulation in LBW Gene name
ATP5F1 0.003504217 29.998667 down 1.850386 down 1.153583 down Homo sapiens ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F0 complex, subunit B1 (ATP5F1), nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein, mRNA [NM_001688]

EHHADH 3.25E-05 29.713446 down 1.004504 up 1.027032 down Homo sapiens enoyl-Coenzyme A, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl Coenzyme A dehydrogenase (EHHADH), mRNA [NM_001966]
CNPY2 6.12E-05 24.275322 down 2.033511 down 1.345912 down Homo sapiens transmembrane protein 4 (TMEM4), mRNA [NM_014255]

IMMP1L 5.31E-04 21.21959 down 1.067236 down 1.052987 up Homo sapiens IMP1 inner mitochondrial membrane peptidase-like (S. cerevisiae) (IMMP1L), mRNA [NM_144981]
GNL2 0.008845676 19.523186 down 1.389994 down 1.352022 up Homo sapiens guanine nucleotide binding protein-like 2 (nucleolar) (GNL2), mRNA [NM_013285]

HRSP12 0.010644738 19.35189 down 1.121147 up 1.013192 up Homo sapiens heat-responsive protein 12 (HRSP12), mRNA [NM_005836]
CN643639 2.57E-05 19.177528 down 1.710693 down 1.132373 up ILLUMIGEN_MCQ_8235 Katze_MMBR Macaca mulatta cDNA clone IBIUW:3333 5' similar to Bases 1 to 682 highly similar to human Unigene Hs.513885, mRNA sequence [CN643639]

PASK 0.03426426 19.17474 up 5.977056 up 2.995584 up Homo sapiens PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase (PASK), mRNA [NM_015148]
NDUFC1 1.93E-04 18.786453 down 1.418954 down 1.095977 up Homo sapiens NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1, subcomplex unknown, 1, 6 kDa (NDUFC1), mRNA [NM_002494]

BNIP3L 3.67E-05 18.46857 down 2.523903 down 1.123252 down Homo sapiens BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa interacting protein 3-like (BNIP3L), mRNA [NM_004331]
GALE 0.004030123 18.304993 down 1.591229 up 1.378757 down Homo sapiens UDP-galactose-4-epimerase (GALE), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_000403]

XM_371837 2.06E-06 18.251152 down 1.76245 down 1.15429 down PREDICTED: Homo sapiens similar to oxidoreductase UCPA (LOC389416), mRNA [XM_371837]
OSTCL 9.90E-05 17.57389 down 1.173702 down 1.075778 down Homo sapiens similar to RIKEN cDNA 2310008M10 (LOC202459), mRNA [NM_145303]

WDR75 7.83E-05 17.02899 down 2.353145 down 1.037028 down Homo sapiens WD repeat domain 75 (WDR75), mRNA [NM_032168]
SMPDL3A 1.25E-05 16.127317 down 1.290077 down 1.780315 down Homo sapiens sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase, acid-like 3A (SMPDL3A), mRNA [NM_006714]

LIN7C 6.29E-04 15.929515 down 1.429568 down 1.006664 down Homo sapiens lin-7 homolog C (C. elegans) (LIN7C), mRNA [NM_018362]
COX7B 8.03E-06 15.9135065 down 1.283232 down 1.138854 up Homo sapiens cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIb (COX7B), nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein, mRNA [NM_001866]

MRPL1 1.35E-06 15.901582 down 1.776047 down 1.05264 up Homo sapiens mitochondrial ribosomal protein L1 (MRPL1), nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein, mRNA [NM_020236]
NPM3 3.58E-04 15.357531 down 1.39378 down 1.314134 up Homo sapiens nucleophosmin/nucleoplasmin, 3 (NPM3), mRNA [NM_006993]

RNF126 4.43E-04 15.14725 down 1.165075 down 1.084156 down Homo sapiens ring finger protein 126 (RNF126), transcript variant 2, mRNA [NM_194460]
ATG4C 1.86E-06 14.422242 down 1.01449 down 1.571663 down Homo sapiens ATG4 autophagy related 4 homolog C (S. cerevisiae) (ATG4C), transcript variant 7, mRNA [NM_032852]

ACMSD 2.00E-04 14.3137 down 1.121731 up 1.098467 down Homo sapiens aminocarboxymuconate semialdehyde decarboxylase (ACMSD), mRNA [NM_138326]
WASF3 0.0026955 14.211387 down 1.134297 down 1.574282 up Homo sapiens WAS protein family, member 3 (WASF3), mRNA [NM_006646]

F13B 1.26E-05 13.94526 down 1.052562 down 1.02993 down Homo sapiens coagulation factor XIII, B polypeptide (F13B), mRNA [NM_001994]
HNRNPA1L2 0.007305239 13.879195 down 1.288451 up 1.062584 down Homo sapiens heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1-like (LOC144983), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_001011724]

XR_011737 0.001940294 13.592515 down 1.736661 down 1.168041 up PREDICTED: Macaca mulatta similar to transcription factor B2, mitochondrial (LOC710669), mRNA [XR_011737]
CP 1.42E-04 13.285389 down 1.122256 down 1.274657 down Homo sapiens ceruloplasmin (ferroxidase) (CP), mRNA [NM_000096]

TOLLIP 1.59E-04 12.683504 down 1.156986 down 1.00844 down Homo sapiens toll interacting protein (TOLLIP), mRNA [NM_019009]
DARS 3.99E-05 12.632657 down 3.152794 down 1.10567 down Homo sapiens aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (DARS), mRNA [NM_001349]

CKLF 4.24E-04 12.476327 down 1.130294 down 1.064736 down Homo sapiens chemokine-like factor (CKLF), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_016951]
STT3B 1.13E-04 12.457355 down 2.027118 down 1.030927 down Homo sapiens STT3, subunit of the oligosaccharyltransferase complex, homolog B (S. cerevisiae) (STT3B), mRNA [NM_178862]

TXNDC11 4.40E-05 12.377014 down 1.525444 down 1.011564 down Homo sapiens thioredoxin domain containing 11 (TXNDC11), mRNA [NM_015914]
CR603105 9.80E-04 12.209639 down 1.284419 down 1.155491 down full-length cDNA clone CS0DF006YN22 of Fetal brain of Homo sapiens (human) [CR603105]

XR_010672 5.09E-05 11.634537 down 1.602301 down 1.059423 up PREDICTED: Macaca mulatta similar to Molybdenum cofactor synthesis protein 2 large subunit (Molybdopterin synthase large subunit) (MPT synthase large subunit) (MOCS2B) (MOCO1-B) (LOC703049), mRNA [XR_010672]
GDE1 0.03917646 11.536806 down 1.190901 up 1.20255 up Homo sapiens membrane interacting protein of RGS16 (MIR16), mRNA [NM_016641]

CFHR2 2.07E-04 11.37657 down 1.208862 down 1.032327 down Homo sapiens complement factor H-related 2 (CFHR2), mRNA [NM_005666]
RPL30 0.03067462 11.374878 down 1.173423 up 1.096937 up Homo sapiens ribosomal protein L30 (RPL30), mRNA [NM_000989]

XM_495885 0.002429009 11.322625 down 1.165255 down 1.156577 down PREDICTED: Homo sapiens similar to ribosomal protein S12 (LOC440055), mRNA [XM_495885]
NDUFB1 2.13E-04 11.293429 down 1.404433 down 1.277028 up Homo sapiens NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 beta subcomplex, 1, 7 kDa (NDUFB1), mRNA [NM_004545]

NM_032807 2.89E-04 11.240869 down 1.075345 down 1.014724 down Homo sapiens F-box protein, helicase, 18 (FBXO18), transcript variant 1, mRNA. [NM_032807]
CSGALNACT 2 1.34E-05 11.216295 down 1.714551 down 1.080183 down Homo sapiens chondroitin sulfate GalNAcT-2 (GALNACT-2), mRNA [NM_018590]

NM_022333 0.002598488 10.94874 down 1.130622 up 1.014866 down Homo sapiens TIA1 cytotoxic granule-associated RNA binding protein-like 1 (TIAL1), ranscript variant 2, mRNA [NM_022333]
NM_032807 0.001172931 10.342792 down 1.522541 down 1.139832 down Homo sapiens F-box protein, helicase, 18 (FBXO18), transcript variant 1, mRNA. [NM_032807]

AAMP 2.62E-05 10.171815 down 1.560637 down 1.085371 down Homo sapiens angio-associated, migratory cell protein (AAMP), mRNA [NM_001087]
ESF1 1.02E-07 9.745275 down 1.620818 down 1.008674 down Homo sapiens ESF1, nucleolar pre-rRNA processing protein, homolog (S. cerevisiae) (ESF1), mRNA [NM_016649]

DOCK7 0.01799708 9.74066 down 1.174452 up 1.171709 up Homo sapiens dedicator of cytokinesis 7 (DOCK7), mRNA [NM_033407]
DDX3Y 4.78E-06 9.687978 down 1.356089 down 1.134329 down Homo sapiens DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 3, Y-linked (DDX3Y), mRNA [NM_004660]

XIAP 3.65E-05 9.587557 down 1.882389 down 1.280735 up Homo sapiens baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 4 (BIRC4), mRNA [NM_001167]
TRPC4AP 9.51E-05 9.4549885 down 1.340843 down 1.07043 up Homo sapiens transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 4 associated protein (TRPC4AP), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_015638]

ADK 1.63E-04 9.386349 down 5.639505 down 1.368648 down Homo sapiens adenosine kinase (ADK), transcript variant ADK-short, mRNA [NM_001123]
NM_0010022 92 3.92E-04 9.258961 down 1.016391 up 1.220083 down Homo sapiens chromosome 1 open reading frame 139 (C1orf139), transcript variant 2, mRNA. [NM_001002292]

Of the 250 genes which were differently expressed in the liver, 182 genes were unique to the liver (115 genes up regulated in the LBW group and 67 genes down-regulated in the LBW group). There were 19 genes which were significantly and differently expressed between liver and skeletal muscle (16 up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 15 genes up regulated in liver and 3 down-regulated in the LBW skeletal muscle and 4 down regulated in LBW liver). There were 5 genes which are significantly and differently expressed between liver and cord (3 up regulated in LBW liver and 2 genes up regulated in LBW cord and 2 down regulated in LBW liver and 3 down regulated in the cord).

Of the 850 genes significantly and differently expressed in skeletal muscle, 733 genes were specific to the skeletal muscle; i.e. showed altered regulation only in the skeletal muscle (584 genes up regulated in the LBW samples and 149 genes down regulated in the LBW group). There were 94 genes which were significantly and differently expressed between skeletal muscle and cord (60 up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 22 genes up regulated in LBW cord and 34 genes down regulated in the LBW skeletal muscle and 72 genes down regulated in the LBW cord).

Of the 891 genes significantly and differently expressed in umbilical cord; 788 genes showed altered regulation only in umbilical cord (338 genes up regulated and 450 genes down regulated in LBW group). There were 4 genes which are significantly and differently expressed between liver, skeletal muscle and umbilical cord (4 genes up regulated in the LBW skeletal muscle and liver while the same four genes were down regulated in LBW cord) Figure 2, 3.

Functional classification of genes

Gene ontology was used to classify genes based on functional significance. The main component of the Gene Ontology (GO) annotation taken into consideration was metabolic function. Genes were classified into fifteen functional categories: Cellular lipid metabolic process (43 genes), Cellular biosynthetic process (95 genes), Cellular macromolecule synthesis (222 genes), Cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process (10 genes), Cellular carbohydrate metabolic process (6 genes), Cellular catabolic process (9 genes), Nucelobase, Nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process (216 genes), Other cellular metabolic process (29 genes), Other metabolic process (36 genes), Transport (141 genes), Regulation of molecular functions (28 genes), Biological adhesion (27 genes), Developmental process (74 genes) Other biological processes (252 genes) and Non classified (795) with p-value of (p > 0.05). The genes enriched for each GO term were further classified into the number of genes up regulated or down regulated in each tissue with a fold difference of 1.5 or greater (Table 5) (Additional file 1).

Table 5.

Gene ontology classification to group genes using Genespring ver10 (Agilent Tech, Santa Clara) of similar functional families.

Skeletal muscle Liver Cord

Up regulated Down regulated Up regulated Down regulated Up regulated Down regulated

Cellular lipid metabolic process 15 6 4 4 13 11
Cellular biosynthesis process 8 14 6 4 16 40

Cellular macromolecule synthesis 21 32 19 14 45 63

Cellular nitrogen metabolic process 4 1 4 0 7 1

Cellular carbohydrate metabolic process 2 0 0 0 2 1

Cellular catabolic process 1 2 0 0 2 1

Nucleobase, Nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process 19 17 15 4 66 43

Other cellular metabolic process 3 2 1 3 3 15

Other metabolic process 5 7 5 2 9 11

Transport 30 17 21 14 39 26

Regulation of molecular functions 4 2 1 1 12 8

Biological adhesion 6 8 4 5 8 10

Developmental process 19 11 7 4 20 16

Other biological process 38 38 25 19 65 59

Quantitative RT-PCR

To validate the micoarray results we carried out quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) using the same RNA samples in the microarray analysis. We selected seven genes (a novel gene XM_116936, PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase (PASK), Adenisine kinase (ADK) transcript variant ADK-short, ELMO/CED-12 domain containing 1 (ELMOD1), Sine oculins homeobox homolog 1 (SIX1) Retinoblastoma like-1 (RBL1) and Solute carrier family 12 (potassium/chloride transporters) member 9 (SLC12A9) for this validation of the array using skeletal muscle cDNA. Of these 5 genes were significantly up regulated in the array and 2 genes were significantly down regulated in the array. Our results from the qPCR complement our results from the microarray (Table 6). The fold differences along with the values which derived from the microarray are presented in Table 6.

Table 6.

Verification of seven genes from the microarray using Real-time RT-PCR analysis in skeletal muscle.

Gene Symbol and description 2 way ANOVA p-value (Birth weight) Microarray Fold change (t-Test) Regulation in LBW qPCR-Fold Change
XM_116936 0.017913306 10.054285 Up regulated
PREDICTED: Homo sapiens similar to RIKEN cDNA 4832428D23 gene 4.780893

PASK: 0.03426426 5.977056 Up regulated
Homo sapiens PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase 14.55481
ADK: 1.63E-04 -5.639505 Down regulated
Homo sapiens adenosine kinase, (transcript variant ADK-short) -3.57235

ELMOD1:
Homo sapiens ELMO/CED-12 domain containing 1. 0.011425177 -1.7373136 Down regulated -1.71015
SIX1:
Homo sapiens sine oculis homeobox homolog 1 (Drosophila). 0.045728132 1.1253903 Up in low birth weight 1.246574

RBL1:
Homo sapiens retinoblastoma-like 1 (p107), (transcript variant 1) 0.011705314 1.5320477 Up regulated 3.023726
SLC12A9:
Homo sapiens solute carrier family 12 (potassium/chloride transporters), member 9. 1.31E-05 1.3670695 Up regulated 1.694303

Discussion

In the present study, we have identified genes involved in key metabolic signaling pathways in three tissue types in a non-human primate model, that were differentially expressed according to the birth weight of the animal. Importantly, this differential expression was across the normal birth weight spectrum and therefore likely to represent adaptive pathways that the fetuses uses to predict its postnatal environment. The identification of novel signaling pathways that appear to be regulated by the early life environment is a key step in designing future experimental paradigms to understand the association between birth weight and disease risk. Metabolic disease particularly, has been strongly with early life adversity [21,22]. Our data begin to shed light on the key signaling pathways that are vulnerable to subtle changes in the early life environment.

The strength of our study, despite its small size, is that we have focused on infants whose growth was not experimentally manipulated but lay within normal birth weight range. Many experimental models have manipulated pregnancy in an effort to produce fetal growth restriction. Such studies have shown that offspring which are born growth restricted catch-up in growth with their normally nourished counterparts and in adulthood are obese, hypertensive, hyperinsulinemic, leptin resistant and display sedentary behavior [23-25]. Investigations into underlying mechanisms and the determination of gene expression levels that may explain these altered phenotypes have produced conflicting results [26-28] which may reflect variations in the model systems used and the gender of the animals used [28]. Taken together, although these studies have established the link between early life nutritional adversity to later pathophysiology, there are limitations in the interpretation of rodent studies in development as applied to humans.

In the present study we aimed to study the molecular associates of growth variation within the normative range and exclude pathology. This is because the growing literature on developmental outcomes highlights that the importance of variation in risk is associated with non-pathological developmental environments. Accordingly we studied relatively small infants born between the 5th and 25th centile but excluded the smallest neonates, which may reflect obstetrical abnormalities. These infants were compared to infants in the middle of the normative range (50th-75th centile) and accordingly we excluded infants who may have had macrosomia as a result of the mother's being over-nourished by being maintained in captivity. Thus we are confident that we have excluded pathological influences and demonstrated that within the normative range patterns of gene expression may vary considerably with variable birth weights. Indeed we found a number of genes with more than a 10 fold shift in expression levels. There are important implications to this observation. Historically, experimental and epidemiological focus has been on the extremes of birth weight (either small for gestational age or large for gestational age) and there has been little focus within the normal birth weight range continuum. What is evident from the present study is that relatively small changes in the birth phenotype may be associated with profound changes in molecular physiology. In turn this also suggests the presence of highly evolved processes by which the fetus can adjust its development in response to subtle cues from mother [29].

The Cynomolgus, as in the human, has monotocous pregnancies with haemochorial placentae; they have omnivorous diets and monogastric digestion. They also share with humans the same progressive history of the metabolic syndrome [17]. We have identified alterations in the levels and expression patterns of a number of genes involved in different metabolic processes including cellular lipid metabolism, cellular biosynthesis, cellular macromolecule synthesis, cellular nitrogen metabolism, cellular carbohydrate metabolism, cellular catabolism, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism, biological adhesion and development.Recently, transcriptional profiling in rats subjected to gestational under nutrition was performed in young adult male rats where 249 genes were shown to be differentially expressed in the liver [28]. We compared the genes which are significantly altered in our array with those identified in the rat array study and have identified twelve similar or closely related genes from those identified in the rat: Tribbles homolog 2 (Trib2); 3-hydroxyanthanillate dioxygenase (Haao), transmembrane serine protease 6 (Tmmprss6); Thioredoxin domain containing10 (Txndc10); tralation initiation factor 4A3 (Eifa3); Ribosomal protein L31 (Rpl31); Danse 1-like 2 (Dnase1l2); Quinolate phosphoribosyl transferase (Qprt); general transcription factor IIa 2 (Gtf2a3); General transcription factor II H 3 [28]. Only four of these genes (Trib2, Trip10, EIF4A3 and Dnase1l2) were altered in the same direction in the livers of LBW macaques as in the rat array. We have also compared our observations with those identified from LBW term placentas by McCarthy and colleagues [30] and found similarities in expression changes in the genes Procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioygense (PLOD2); Soluble interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP); Solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter) member3 (SLC2A3); Myosin V1(MYH6); Ribosomal protein S6(RPS6) and Latexin (LXN). The Tribbles homolog 2 (Trib2) is also increased in the LBW infants and suggests another possible way in way insulin/IGF-1 signalling might be impaired during development. Tribbles belongs to a family of kinase-like proteins and are reported to be negative regulators of Akt, the principle target of insulin signaling [31,32].

Studies using animal models such as rodents to understand the developmental origins of metabolic diseases have shown that epigenetic changes in genes correlates with expression changes including metabolic enzymes such as PEPCK, transcriptional factors such as PPARα which regulate fat metabolism and factors associated with insulin action (e.g. PI3 kinase, PKC-ζ), the key regulatory genes which are responsible for bringing these changes are not known [15,33]. One aim in our study was to identify whether there were shifts within the expression of key early regulators and from the array we have identified one such key regulatory gene the PAS Kinase (PASK), an evolutionarily conserved PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase whose expression is altered as a result of adverse early developmental conditions. PAS domains are evolutionarily conserved and appear from archaea, bacteria to eukaryotes and are present in many signaling proteins where they act as signal sensor domain [34]. The PASK gene, whereby expression was up regulated in the LBW animals, has been shown to be a metabolic sensor based on mice knock-out studies; mice lacking PASK are resistant to high-fat induced obesity, hepatic steatosis and are resistant to insulin [35].

Conclusions

In summary, this paper has identified significant variation in gene expression in multiple tissues in primate newborns of different growth trajectories but within the normative range of birth size. Further detailed analyses may improve our understanding of how alterations in such genes due to adverse early life environment predisposes towards metabolic syndrome. These data give strength to the hypothesis that developmental plasticity operating within the normative range of birth weights can influence metabolic and other physiological systems in a way that might have later health consequences. It emphasizes that the concept of developmental programming need not involve pathological changes in growth trajectories to have molecular and presumably functional consequences.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

BSE, RK and PDG conceived the study. KC, DMS and MHV coordinated and collected the animal samples. BSE and SM undertook the molecular biology. BSE and PDG wrote the manuscript. BSE, KC, DMS, SM, MHV, RK and PDG reviewed/edited manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1

Genes which were differentially regulated between the ABW and LBW groups classified based on GO terms. Genes with a ≥ 1.5 fold change at least in one tissue with a p value of ≥ 0.5 identified from the array with the GO terms

Click here for file (2.2MB, DOC)

Contributor Information

Bright Starling Emerald, Email: bsemerald@uaeu.ac.ae.

Keefe Chng, Email: keefe_chng@sics.a-star.edu.sg.

Shinya Masuda, Email: Shinya_Masuda@sics.a-star.edu.sg.

Deborah M Sloboda, Email: d.sloboda@auckland.ac.nz.

Mark H Vickers, Email: m.vickers@auckland.ac.nz.

Ravi Kambadur, Email: KRavi@ntu.edu.sg.

Peter D Gluckman, Email: pd.gluckman@auckland.ac.nz.

Acknowledgements

BSE, RK, PDG, KC, SM are supported by Agency for Science, Technology and research (Singapore). PDG, DMS, MHV are funded by the National Research Centre for Growth and Development, University of Auckland (New Zealand).

References

  1. Barker DJ, Winter PD, Osmond C, Margetts B, Simmonds SJ. Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease. Lancet. 1989;2(8663):577–80. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90710-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker DJP. The fetal and infant origins of adult disease, London. British Medical Journal Publishing. 1993. pp. 1–343.
  3. Barker DJ, Gluckman PD, Godfrey KM, Harding JE, Owens JA, Robinson JS. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet. 1993;341(8850):938–41. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91224-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Phillips P, Wilson D, Taylor A, Esterman A, Wakefield M. Cardiovascular risk factors in South Australians with diabetes. Aust J Public Health. 1994;18(4):445–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1994.tb00280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Curhan GC, Chertow GM, Willett WC, Spiegelman D, Colditz GA, Manson JE, Speizer FE, Stampfer MJ. Birth weight and adult hypertension and obesity in women. Circulation. 1996;94(6):1310–5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.6.1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Ascherio AL, Stampfer MJ. Birth weight and adult hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity in US men. Circulation. 1996;94(12):3246–50. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.12.3246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burdge GC, Lillycrop KA. Nutrition, epigenetics, and developmental plasticity: implications for understanding human disease. Annu Rev Nutr. 2010;30:315–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.012809.104751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Bateson P, Beedle AS, Law CM, Bhutta ZA, Anokhin KV, Bougnères P, Chandak GR, Dasgupta P, Smith GD, Ellison PT, Forrester TE, Gilbert SF, Jablonka E, Kaplan H, Prentice AM, Simpson SJ, Uauy R, West-Eberhard MJ. Towards a new developmental synthesis: adaptive developmental plasticity and human disease. Lancet. 2009;373(9675):1654–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60234-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Living with the past: evolution, development, and patterns of disease. Science. 2004;305(5691):1733–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1095292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Beedle AS. Early life events and their consequences for later disease: a life history and evolutionary perspective. Am J Hum Biol. 2007;19(1):1–19. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hales CN, Barker DJ. The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Br Med Bull. 2001;60:5–20. doi: 10.1093/bmb/60.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):61–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0708473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Burdge GC, Hanson MA, Slater-Jefferies JL, Lillycrop KA. Epigenetic regulation of transcription: a mechanism for inducing variations in phenotype (fetal programming) by differences in nutrition during early life? Br J Nutr. 2007;97(6):1036–46. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507682920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lillycrop KA, Slater-Jefferies JL, Hanson MA, Godfrey KM, Jackson AA, Burdge GC. Induction of altered epigenetic regulation of the hepatic glucocorticoid receptor in the offspring of rats fed a protein-restricted diet during pregnancy suggests that reduced DNA methyltransferase-1 expression is involved in impaired DNA methylation and changes in histone modifications. Br J Nutr. 2007;97:1064–73. doi: 10.1017/S000711450769196X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vickers MH, Gluckman PD, Coveny AH, Hofman PL, Cutfield WS, Gertler A, Breier BH, Harris M. Neonatal leptin treatment reverses developmental programming. Endocrinology. 2005;146(10):4211–6. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vickers MH, Gluckman PD, Coveny AH, Hofman PL, Cutfield WS, Gertler A, Breier BH, Harris M. The effect of neonatal leptin treatment on postnatal weight gain in male rats is dependent on maternal nutritional status during pregnancy. Endocrinology. 2008;149(4):1906–13. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wagner JE, Kavanagh K, Ward GM, Auerbach BJ, Harwood HJ Jr, Kaplan JR. Old world nonhuman primate models of type 2 diabetes mellitus. ILAR J. 2006;47(3):259–71. doi: 10.1093/ilar.47.3.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tarantal AF, HendrickX AG. Charecterization of prenatal growth and development in the Crab-eating macaque (Macaca fasicularis) by ultrasound. The Anatomical record. 1988;222:177–184. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092220210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods mol Biol. 2000;132:365–386. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–8. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Maternal constraint of fetal growth and its consequences. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;9(5):419–25. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2004.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Godfrey KM, Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Developmental origins of metabolic disease: life course and intergenerational perspectives. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21(4):199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vickers MH, Breier BH, Cutfield WS, Hofman PL, Gluckman PD. Fetal origins of hyperphagia, obesity, and hypertension and postnatal amplification by hypercaloric nutrition. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000;279(1):E83–7. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2000.279.1.E83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vickers MH, Reddy S, Ikenasio BA, Breier BH. Dysregulation of the adipoinsular axis-a mechanism for the pathogenesis of hyperleptinemia and adipogenic diabetes induced by fetal programming. J Endocrinol. 2001;170(2):323–32. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1700323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vickers MH, Breier BH, McCarthy D, Gluckman PD. Sedentary behavior during postnatal life is determined by the prenatal environment and exacerbated by postnatal hypercaloric nutrition. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003;285(1):R271–3. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00051.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lillycrop KA, Phillips ES, Jackson AA, Hanson MA, Burdge GC. Dietary protein restriction of pregnant rats induces and folic acid supplementation prevents epigenetic modification of hepatic gene expression in the offspring. J Nutr. 2005;135(6):1382–6. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.6.1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lillycrop KA, Rodford J, Garratt ES, Slater-Jefferies JL, Godfrey KM, Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Burdge GC. Maternal protein restriction with or without folic acid supplementation during pregnancy alters the hepatic transcriptome in adult male rats. Br J Nutr. 2010;103(12):1711–9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509993795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morris TJ, Vickers M, Gluckman P, Gilmour S, Affara N. Transcriptional profiling of rats subjected to gestational undernourishment: implications for the developmental variations in metabolic traits. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e7271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Morton SM, Pinal CS. Life-long echoes--a critical analysis of the developmental origins of adult disease model. Biol Neonate. 2005;87(2):127–39. doi: 10.1159/000082311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McCarthy C, Cotter FE, McElwaine S, Twomey A, Mooney EE, Ryan F, Vaughan J. Altered gene expression patterns in intrauterine growth restriction: potential role of hypoxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(1):70.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Du K, Herzig S, Kulkarni RN, Montminy M. TRB3: a tribbles homolog that inhibits Akt/PKB activation by insulin in liver. Science. 2003;300(5625):1574–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1079817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hegedus Z, Czibula A, Kiss-Toth E. Tribbles: a family of kinase-like proteins with potent signalling regulatory function. Cell Signal. 2007;19(2):238–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Godfrey KM, Lillycrop KA, Burdge GC, Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Epigenetic mechanisms and the mismatch concept of the developmental origins of health and disease. Pediatr Res. 2007;61:5R–10R. doi: 10.1203/pdr.0b013e318045bedb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rutter J, Michnoff CH, Harper SM, Gardner KH, McKnight SL. PAS kinase: an evolutionarily conserved PAS domain-regulated serine/threonine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(16):8991–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161284798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hao HX, Cardon CM, Swiatek W, Cooksey RC, Smith TL, Wilde J, Boudina S, Abel ED, McClain DA, Rutter J. PAS kinase is required for normal cellular energy balance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(39):15466–71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705407104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1

Genes which were differentially regulated between the ABW and LBW groups classified based on GO terms. Genes with a ≥ 1.5 fold change at least in one tissue with a p value of ≥ 0.5 identified from the array with the GO terms

Click here for file (2.2MB, DOC)

Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES