Skip to main content
Epilepsy Currents logoLink to Epilepsy Currents
. 2002 May;2(3):81–85. doi: 10.1046/j.1535-7597.2002.00031.x

Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors and Epileptogenesis

Robert K S Wong *,, Shih-Chieh Chuang *, Riccardo Bianchi *
PMCID: PMC321022  PMID: 15309152

Abstract

Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) often produces long-lasting effects on the excitability of cortical neurons. For example, mGluR stimulation induces long-term potentiation or depression of excitatory synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. Similarly, the effects of mGluRs on cortical epileptiform activities also are enduring. A transient application of group I mGluR agonists to hippocampal slices produces ictal-like discharges that persist for hours after the removal of the applied agonist. This action of group I mGluRs—transforming “normal” hippocampal slice into an “epileptic-like” one—may represent a form of epileptogenesis. The advent of such a model, in which epileptogenesis can be reliably induced in an in vitro preparation and the process is complete within hours, may facilitate the exploration of cellular mechanisms underlying epileptogenesis.

Introduction

Glutamate is the primary transmitter in the central nervous system. Synaptically released glutamate activates ionotropic and metabotropic receptors. Activation of ionotropic receptors and the opening of the associated ionic channels mediate fast signaling between nerve cells. Metabotropic receptors are G protein–coupled receptors. Activation of these receptors triggers intracellular biochemical cascades and elicits immediate and long-term effects on neuronal excitability. In the study of basic mechanisms of epilepsy, ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) have been demonstrated to play an important role in the generation of interictal discharges 1, 2, 3. Recent findings indicate that activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) may lead to the generation of ictal discharges 4, 5.

Eight subtypes of mGluRs (mGluR1–8) have been cloned and classified into three different groups based on biochemical and pharmacologic properties 6, 7. Activation of each group of mGluRs elicits different effects on epileptiform activities. Specifically, stimulation of group II (mGluR 2 and 3) and group III (mGluR 4, 6, 7, and 8) mGluRs (Gi protein–coupled receptors) suppresses seizures 8, 9. In contrast, agonists of group I (mGluR 1 and 5) mGluRs (Gq protein–coupled receptors) elicit convulsive activities 10, 11. Group I mGluRs have widespread distribution in the brain and are especially prominent in the CA3 region of the hippocampus 12, 13, 14.

An interesting feature of mGluR-mediated effects is that they are often long lasting. For example, activation of mGluRs sustains long-term potentiation (LTP) 15, 16, 17 and induces long-term depression (LTD) 18, 19, 20 of the CA3–CA1 synaptic connection. Similarly, mGluR stimulation produces long-lasting effects on cortical epileptiform activities. Transient activation of group I mGluRs by agonist application elicits epileptiform discharges in hippocampal slices that linger for hours after the washout of the agonist 21. The anticonvulsive action of group III mGluR agonist on the hippocampal neuronal network is also long lasting, in that the anticonvulsant effects persist long after agonist removal 22.

In this review, we describe the group I mGluR–induced epileptiform discharges and their long-lasting properties. In addition, we discuss plausible biochemical and cellular mechanisms underlying the plasticity process that induces and maintains the epileptiform discharges.

Group I mGluR-mediated Epileptiform Discharges

Group I mGluR agonists [e.g. (S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine; DHPG] elicit synchronized episodes of oscillatory synaptic depolarizations and overriding action potentials (episodes of oscillations) in the CA3 neuronal population of hippocampal slices. The episodes of oscillations have duration between 2 and 15 s, and they occur rhythmically at intervals of 10–20 s (Fig. 1A)21, 23. Within an episode, synaptic depolarizations appear rhythmically at 12–27 Hz (Fig. 1B; β-oscillations). The synaptic depolarizations reach firing threshold, and each depolarization may then elicit one to three action potentials. The hypersynchronized nature of an episode of oscillations, the frequency of oscillations within an episode, and the duration of an episode are comparable to those occurring in an ictal discharge. As such, information on the generation and plasticity mechanisms associated with the episodes of oscillations (ictal-like discharges) may shed light on the generation of ictal discharges and on epileptogenesis, respectively.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Group I mglur activation induces ictal-like discharges in the CA3 region of the hippocampus. Intracellular recordings from a CA3 pyramidal neuron of a mouse hippocampal slice 70 min after addition of the Group I mGluR agonist (S )-3,5-dihydroxphenylglycine (DHPG; 50 μM) to the perfusing solution. Top traces in A and B: two episodes of oscillations, each of 6–7 s in duration, recorded at resting membrane potential (A) and at a potential hyperpolarized with –1 nA DC current injection (B). The indicated membrane potential values refer to the beginning of the traces. Bottom traces in A and B: portions of the top traces indicated by bars shown on a faster time scale. Calibrations in B also apply to A. The hyperpolarization in B reveals that excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPS) occurring at about 14 Hz (β-oscillations) underlie the rhythmic discharges during an episode of oscillations. The episodes of oscillations are population discharges because their frequency was not altered by membrane potential changes, and they were recorded as extracellular field potentials.

As mentioned earlier, ictal-like discharges such as those shown in Fig. 1, once induced by an agonist, persist for hours after agonist washout.

Plasticity Mechanisms Underlying Group I mGluR-Induced Long-Lasting Ictal-Like Discharges

Plastic changes in neuronal excitability, including those leading to the generation of long-lasting ictal-like discharges, generally proceed in two temporal stages: induction and maintenance. During induction, biochemical and/or molecular activities modify the properties of synaptic and/or ionic channel (cellular) processes. The plastic phenomenon is then expressed by the activation of the modified cellular processes. Induction is followed by maintenance, during which the cellular modifications are stabilized for the long-term expression of the plastic phenomenon.

We present information on the induction, maintenance, and expression of long-lasting ictal-like discharges.

Induction

Group I mGluR-induced plasticity generally involves translational modifications of protein function. For example, mGluR-dependent LTP 17 and LTD 20, 24 are both blocked by pretreatment with protein-synthesis inhibitor. Biochemical studies in synaptoneurosomes prepared from cortical neurons 25, 26 confirm that group I mGluR activation does lead to protein synthesis, including the production of fragile X mental retardation protein.

Consistent with this general scheme, induction of group I mGluR-dependent ictal-like discharges is also protein synthesis- dependent. Pretreatment of slices with a protein-synthesis inhibitor (anisomycin or cycloheximide) prevents the appearance of ictal-like discharges after agonist application 27.

The induction of long-lasting ictal-like discharges is accompanied by the development of spontaneous episodes of synchronized discharges of increasing duration and frequency 21. During each episode of synchronized discharge, CA3 pyramidal cells are excited by their recurrent synaptic connections through activations of postsynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptors. The discharges also produce prolonged neuronal depolarizations and activation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Because NMDA-receptor activation and Ca2+ entry are cellular events known to induce plastic changes in neuronal excitability, the involvement of these events in the generation of long-lasting ictal-like discharges must be considered. Data indicate that induction of long-lasting epileptiform discharges can occur independent of a contribution by NMDA receptors, as these discharges are induced in the presence of NMDA-receptor blockers 28. Furthermore, the induction process is not affected by blocking both the NMDA and non-NMDA receptors 29. Under this condition, application of group I mGluR agonist no longer elicits synchronized discharges. Interestingly, after a period of “silent” agonist treatment, long-lasting ictal-like discharges emerge on the washout of the agonist followed by the removal of iGluR blockers in the perfusing solution.

The data indicate that induction of long-lasting ictal-like discharges depends primarily on an activation of group I mGluRs. Coactivation of NMDA receptors or endogenous Ca2+ channels associated with synchronized discharges is not required for the induction of long-lasting ictal-like discharges. Studies are now beginning to assess the relative importance of subtypes of mGluRs (mGluR1 and mGluR5) in the induction and maintenance of long-lasting ictal-like discharges. The results suggest a more important contribution of mGluR5 in the induction process, whereas mGluR1 appears to play a more dominant role in maintenance 30.

Maintenance

Ictal-like discharges, once induced, are no longer affected by protein-synthesis inhibitors. The data suggest that new proteins, once synthesized, can function for hours to sustain ongoing activities 27. Ictal-like discharges during the maintenance phase are blocked by group I mGluR and mGluR1 antagonists 21, 30. Because endogenous glutamate is the only agonist available during the maintenance phase, the data suggest that ictal-like discharges are maintained by synaptically released glutamate.

Expression

The cellular processes activated synaptically during maintenance for the expression of ictal-like discharges have not been identified. ImGluR(V), a voltage-dependent depolarizing current, elicited by group I mGluR stimulation 31, is a candidate 32.

ImGluR(V), a Candidate Cellular Response Sustaining Long-lasting Ictal-like Discharges

ImGluR(V) appears in the presence of a group I mGluR agonist 31. The current increases the excitability of CA3 pyramidal cells and can elicit rhythmic firing in individual cells 32. Data suggest that population ictal-like discharges are generated by the synchronization of the single-cell rhythmic firing through the recurrent excitatory synapses 23, 32.

Recent studies showed that pharmacologic blockade of phospholipase C (PLC) or knockout of the gene for PLCβ1 prevents the induction of ImGluR(V). As a result, single-cell rhythmic firing is suppressed, and the mGluR agonist no longer activates ictal-like discharges. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the group I mGluR/PLC-dependent ImGluR(V) is a cellular response necessary to sustain the population ictal-like discharges.

At present, it is unclear whether ImGluR(V) is active during the maintenance phase. For ImGluR(V) to be active in the maintenance phase, plastic changes must have occurred during the initial exposure to group I mGluR agonist, so that the responsiveness of ImGluR(V) to endogenous glutamate is increased. This increased responsiveness would then enable the current to be recruited synaptically and to participate in the production of ictal-like discharges during maintenance.

Summary

Studies in hippocampal slices show that a transient application of a group I mGluR agonist produces long-term changes in the cellular responses of the CA3 neuronal network, enabling the network to generate recurring ictal-like discharges. The cellular mechanisms underlying the mGluR-dependent epileptogenesis are largely unexplored. Group I mGluRs turn on a voltage-gated ionic current (ImGluR(V)) in CA3 pyramidal cells. Potentiation of the ImGluR(V) response may constitute one of the plastic changes underlying group I mGluR-mediated epileptogenesis. The group I mGluR model of epileptogenesis may have particular relevance to epilepsy because the induction mechanism is dependent on neuronal responses activated by glutamate, an endogenous neurotransmitter.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Lisa R. Merlin for helpful comments. Work supported by NS 35481.

References

  • 1.Lee WL, Hablitz JJ. Involvement of non-NMDA receptors in picrotoxin-induced epileptiform activity in the hippocampus. Neurosci Lett 1989;107:129–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee WL, Hablitz JJ. Effect of APV and ketamine on epileptiform activity in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus. Epilepsy Res 1990;6:87–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prince DA. Epileptogenic neurons and circuits. Adv Neurol 1999;79:665–684. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chapman AG. Glutamate and epilepsy. J Nutr 2000;130:1043S–1045S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wong RKS, Bianchi R, Taylor GW, Merlin LR. Role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in epilepsy. Adv Neurol 1999;79:685–698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nakanishi S. Metabotropic glutamate receptors: synaptic transmission, modulation, and plasticity. Neuron 1994;13:1031–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Conn PJ, Pin J-P. Pharmacology and functions of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1997;37:205–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Attwell PJ, Singh KN, Jane DE, et al. Anticonvulsant and glutamate release-inhibiting properties of the highly potent metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist (2S,2R,3R)-2-(2,3-dicarboxycyclopropyl)glycine (DCG-IV). Brain Res 1998;805:138–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gasparini F, Bruno V, Battaglia G, et al. (R,S)-4-phosphonophenylglycine, a potent and selective group III metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist, is anticonvulsive and neuroprotective in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;289:1678–1687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Camon L, Vives P, de Vera N, et al. Seizures and neuronal damage induced in the rat by activation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors with their selective agonist 3,5-dihydroxyphenyglycine. J Neurosci Res 1998;51:339–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chapman AG, Nanan K, Williams M, Meldrum BS. Anticonvulsant activity of the metabotropic glutamate group I antagonists selective for the mGluR5 receptor: 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP), and (E)-6-methyl-2-styryl-pyridine (SIB 1893). Neuropharmacology 2000;39:1567–1574. 10.1016/S0028-3908(99)00242-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fotuhi M, Standaert DG, Testa CM, et al. Differential expression of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex of the rat. Mol Brain Res 1994;21:283–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shigemoto R, Kinoshita A, Wada E, et al. Differential presynaptic localization of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtypes in the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 1997;17:7503–7522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lujan R, Nusser Z, Roberts JDB, et al. Perisynaptic location of metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR1 and mGluR5 on dendrites and dendritic spines in the rat hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 1996;8:1488–1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bashir ZI, Bortolotto ZA, Davies CH, et al. Induction of LTP in the hippocampus needs synaptic activation of glutamate metabotropic receptors. Nature 1993;363:347–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bortolotto ZA, Bashir ZI, Davies CH, et al. A molecular switch activated by metabotropic glutamate receptors regulates induction of long-term potentiation. Nature 1994;368:740–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Raymond CR, Thompson VL, Tate WP, et al. Metabotropic glutamate receptors trigger homosynaptic protein synthesis to prolong long-term potentiation. J Neurosci 2000;20:969–976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oliet SH, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. Two distinct forms of long-term depression coexist in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells. Neuron 1997;18:969–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bolshakov VY, Siegelbaum SA. Postsynaptic induction and presynaptic expression of hippocampal long-term depression. Science 1994;264:1148–1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huber KM, Kayser MS, Bear MF. Role for rapid dendritic protein synthesis in hippocampal mGluR-dependent long-term depression. Science 2000;288:1254–1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Merlin LR, Wong RKS. Role of Group J metabotropic glutamate receptors in the patterning of epileptiform activities in vitro. J Neurophysiol 1997;78:539–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shrestha A, Staley KJ. Induction of LTD by activation of group III metabotropic glutamate receptor in CA3. Soc Neurosci Abstr 2001;27:388.8. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Taylor GW, Merlin LR, Wong RKS. Synchronized oscillations in hippocampal CA3 neurons induced by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. J Neurosci 1995;15:8039–8052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Snyder EM, Philopot BD, Huber KM, et al. Internalization of ionotropic glutamate receptors in response to mGluR activation. Nat Neurosci 2001;4:1079–1085. 10.1038/nn746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Angenstein F, Greenough WT, Weiler IJ. Metabotropic glutamate receptor-initiated translocation of protein kinase p90rsk to polyribosomes: a possible factor regulating synaptic protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:15078–15083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Weiler IJ, Irwin SA, Klintsova AY, et al. Fragile X mental retardation protein is translated near synapses in response to neurotransmitter activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:5395–5400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Merlin LR, Bergold PJ, Wong RKS. Requirement of protein synthesis for group I mGluR-mediated induction of epileptiform discharges. J Neurophysiol 1998;80:989–993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Galoyan SM, Merlin LR. Long-lasting potentiation of epileptiform bursts by group I mGluRs is NMDA receptor-independent. J Neurophysiol 2000;83:2463–2467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Merlin LR. Group I mGluR-mediated silent induction of long-lasting epileptiform discharges. J Neurophysiol 1999;82:1078–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Merlin LR. Differential roles for mGluR1 and mGluR5 in the persistent prolongation of epileptiform bursts. J Neurophysiol 2002;87:621–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chuang SC, Bianchi R, Wong RKS. Group I mGluR activation turns on a voltage-dependent inward current in hippocampal pyramidal cells. J Neurophysiol 2000;83:2844–2853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chuang SC, Bianchi R, Kim D, Shin HS, Wong RKS. Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors elicit epileptiform discharges in the hippocampus through PLCβ1 signaling. J Neurosci 2001;21:6387–6394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epilepsy Currents are provided here courtesy of American Epilepsy Society

RESOURCES