To the Editor
We applaud Siebenrock et al. for their article, “The Cam-type Deformity of the Proximal Femur Arises in Childhood in Response to Vigorous Sporting Activity” [10]. The article provides some of the first strong contemporary evidence in support of a highly plausible hypothesis regarding the etiology of cam morphology involved in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). As the authors recognize, the idea that vigorous sporting activity in young athletes predisposes to the development of cam morphology was originally proposed by Murray and Duncan in 1971 [7] and more recently by Hogervorst et al. [4]. Although the amount of clinical research for various treatment methods for FAI has increased exponentially in recent years [3], there is a lack of studies regarding how the underlying morphologic features arise. Nevertheless, where orthopaedic publication lacks, anthropologic literature delves deep into the structure of the proximal femur and offers a broad ontologic perspective of morphologic features of the hip [6]. In the evolution from sprawling quadruped to upright man, a rounder femoral head often has been associated with smaller, tree-climbing creatures and a flatter, aspherical femoral head with larger, cursorial animals [9]. We suspect the shape of the hip is guided by a balance between the demands for ROM and axial loading, and that adolescent activities that require hip flexibility and strength might protect against the development of cam morphology. However, the physis and its supporting structures have an ability to adapt to various loads [5, 11, 12] and may contribute to cam morphology [4, 10] in response to shear stress across the physis with loading during agility sports [8]. Axial stress on the hip is not attributable solely to a ponderous body mass, but also to the magnitude of muscular forces acting across the joint [2]. The development of cam morphology and the radiographic basis for the development of FAI contrast to the later development of clinical FAI, where repetitive or prolonged impingement-type motions cause abutment and exacerbate symptoms. Similar to the association between constitutional knee varus and increased impact sports during growth [1], cam morphology likely represents a characteristic musculoskeletal trait secondary to natural adaptation to specific demands during adolescence. Although it might predispose individuals to clinically symptomatic FAI and early degenerative joint disease, the development of cam morphology is not necessarily a pathologic process in itself. When viewed primarily from a treatment standpoint, cam morphology often is deemed a deformity. However, when placed in the broader context of evolutionary history and biomechanical forces, it might simply represent a human anatomic variant reflecting the wide spectrum of activity levels among individuals, the ability of the human body to modulate its form, and the potential limits of this ability to create a long-lasting, yet universally high-functioning hip.
Footnotes
(Re: Siebenrock KA, Ferner F, Noble PC, Santore RF, Werlen S, Mamisch TC. The cam-type deformity of the proximal femur arises in childhood in response to vigorous sporting activity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jul 15. [Epub ahead of print]
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
References
- 1.Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 June 9. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Brandt KD, Dieppe P, Radin EL. Commentary: is it useful to subset “primary” osteoarthritis? A critique based on evidence regarding the etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2009;39:81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Haviv B, Burg A, Velkes S, Salai M, Dudkiewicz I. Trends in femoroacetabular impingement research over 11 years. Orthopedics. 2011;34:353. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110317-04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hogervorst T, Bouma H, Vos J. Evolution of the hip and pelvis. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2009;80:1–39. doi: 10.1080/17453690610046620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hueter C. Anotomische Studien an den Extremitatengelenken Neugeborener und Erwachsener. Virchow Arch Pathol Anat. 1862;26:484–519. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lovejoy CO. The natural history of human gait and posture: Part 2. Hip and thigh. Gait Posture. 2005;21:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Murray RO, Duncan C. Athletic activity in adolescence as an etiological factor in degenerative hip disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1971;53:406–419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ng VY, Ellis TJ. More than just a bump: cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and the evolution of the femoral neck. Hip Int. 2011;21:1–8. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2011.6288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Serrat MA, Reno PL, McCollum MA, Meindl RS, Lovejoy CO. Variation in mammalian proximal femoral development: comparative analysis of two distinct ossification patterns. J Anat. 2007;210:249–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00694.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Siebenrock KA, Ferner F, Noble PC, Santore RF, Werlen S, Mamisch TC. The cam-type deformity of the proximal femur arises in childhood in response to vigorous sporting activity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 July 15. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Smith JW. The relationship of epiphyseal plates to stress in some bones of the lower limb. J Anat. 1962;96:58–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Volkmann R. Chirurgische Erfahrungen uber Knochenverbiegung und Knochenwachtsum. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat. 1862;24:512–540. [Google Scholar]
